Miles Williams Mathis.   One of the foremost revisionist intellectuals today?

June 2024: Amber Alert for Miles W Mathis

Skip this to the next bit if you know this already

      Here's a grab of a video John Campbell is talked to by Joshua Guetzkov on 'Pfizer vaccine' on 4th October 2023. Campbell—I'd guess a northern crypto-Jew (there are many in the US)—like Josh has no idea of the complexities of medical research, especially under Jewish control. (The tiny weasel, Fauci, incredibly, was also part of the HIV/AIDS frauds). Campbell refers to him as an 'academic' (Guetzkov appears to be a junior criminologist—in Israel, of all places!) and Josh in car salesman mode does his schpiel.
      On medical matters I have to note the Jewish takeover in the USA which seems to me worse than in Europe, where there is a tradition, not yet killed, of serious research work by white Europeans. Whereas the money takeover in the USA is largely complete, so medicine is a sort of bastard of Jewish avariciousness, Jewish control of the entire medical publication industry to the point where journals are useless, insurance substituting for medical work, expensive 'treatments' in place of effective ones, leaving many Americans in debt over that one issue. They also have dangerous control over the history of medicine, inserting any lies that they please. Mathis' only fightback is home cures and avoidance of hospitals.
      I found pieces credited to Josh G on Miles's site: butler.pdf, dreyfus.pdf, fakir.pdf [on Gandhi], israbluff.pdf (on the 'iron dome'), and rabin.pdf. But there are many more, some of a low-grade technical nature, where for example Mathis praised J's editing! This may be something to do with his site still having 2023 dates, despite this being nearly mid-June. Miles has a long history of claiming high hit rates, though never with any evidence. He seems unaware of the existence of log files on his host site.
      Hidden technical incompetence is another problem. I think his huge lists of surnames of related people is his way of announcing his inability to produce good diagrams. A sudden flurry of downloads of Paul Bustion from my site—Bustion did very solid work on the ADL's fraudulent foundations based on law cases manipulated by relatives—but emailed enormous email-filling graphics to me. Looking back, probably that's one reason why Mathis did not use Bustion's work, though hints from Guetzkof may have worked in the same direction.
      I have to wonder whether Mathis can't even sketch his own ideas, and scan them.
      An irritant is his insistence that he (MM) exposed the nuclear weapons fraud. He put up a few derivative pieces, but in fact the issue was hammered out between many contributors, not including him, which I alone had the skill to reconstruct after it was instantly removed without warning by Jesse Waugh.
      Another irritant to me is that MM would not connect me with 'Lestrade' who seems to be a highly competent European researching into online Jew media, mainly WikiPedia.
      A more recent occurrence is his concentration on trivia. He seems to see himself as something like a cat lady, Monty Python's Bicycle Repair Man, and an extreme narcissist, triumphantly saying how much better he looks that others. All this is a part of his pleas for money, which, on reflection, I'm suspicious of. He seems to have a wealthy (in the US sense) family, and will possibly inherit.
      There are now (July '24) three supposed descriptions of MM by anonymous female visitors. These are rather sadly unhelpful. He's supposed to re-cover and otherwise attend to 'old books'. Any bibliophile would want to know dates, publishers, topics; and his favourites and perhaps dislikes. But in each case these women in effect say "Gee he has books". Something similar with his physics: no information, no scraps of conversation, no surprise insights. And nothing on his social science: what does he mean by 'fascist'? What exactly are 'spooks'? Why should the FBI and CIA dominate? What has he concluded abut the balance between 'Jews' and 'aristocrats'? What can he say about the influence of Jewish money power vs every other sort? Has he any genetic projections about humanity, in the very long term? There's nothing.
      [Off-topic: It may be possible to train cats against killing birds; I've read that a sharp slap can override the instinct. Maybe. And on cats, MM seems unaware of the issue of toxoplasmosis.]
      Taking all in all, much of his work is shadowed by the suspicion that it was a series of Jew feeds, and therefore unlikely to include serious Jew-handling points. It is possible he may receive Jewish funding; he seems to get easier money than most. His science work (and I'm speaking as someone who has often investigated such people) seems uncertain, and, since he never discusses it, needs justification. But I'm giving up, and wishing good luck to other investigators.

---

      My site has this copied piece big-lies.org/jews/how-jews-took-over-china-josh-2021.html on Chinese 'communism' by 'Josh' which looks to me the same Josh. I hardly need to say that a Jew commenting on a takeover of an entire country by new (or old) Jews is unlikely to be honestly reported.
      I wonder if the highest ranking Jews regret flooding the world with such creepy 'Jews', who they must regard as inferior loose cannons. It is possible the downfall of Jews may happen because of them; the high-rankers may have done better without them. Another possibility is a fall when accurate genetics explains their innate inbred diseases. Or when the absurdities of 'female descent' are made clear.
      There seems to be a new Jewish policy underway, to minimise past deaths caused by Jews. The partial failure of the Holohoax lies—they still maintain this fiction, and their paper money power enables them to buy most opposition. But in parallel they are trying to erase past mass deaths.
      Taking a long view, this must have happened in the past: how many people know about Cromwell's wars, for example? How many people understand the obvious fact that 'Great War' deaths must have been deliberate? How many GUlags are preserved for posterity? How much is known of China? And the same pattern is visible faintly for millennia.
      At the moment we have movements to claim that Dresden and Pearl Harbor were fully faked, which seem part of this movement. In fact it's easy to see that any population on which Jews feed for manpower mass deaths is likely to be culled every (say) 25 years, which can be made to fit into WW1, WW2, Vietnam, Iraq, 9/11, and so on.
      There is a parallel process—waiting for people to die off. Participants in the Vietnam War for example have almost no writings. Many can't write, which is another help to the status quo.

      A good new writer is 'Lestrade' also known as 'Unpopular Opinion'. Miles said he didn't know he'd made a video; here's a grab of Lestrade's half-hour video The Sheer Number of Them meaning spooks or agents or trolls.
      I emailed MM to ask if he could give me an email address for Lestrade, or say I'd like him to contact me, as he seems to be in Penzance, SW England. But I never heard.

      I have good reason to believe Miles has been lied to, or perhaps 'misled' is a kinder word, about his site. It's easy to imagine JoshG breezily assuring MM, who seems inexpert on computers, that his site is viral and thriving. Without giving evidence. MM must feel his work ought to be 'viral'. But that wish doesn't make it true.
      Let me make it clear that I consider MM's contributions to be exceptional. I'm aware that many people in the past failed to discuss things, when they should have: Belloc and H G Wells make a good pair of examples. But it's likely that JoshG provided some unacknowledged evidence to MM, and must be suspected of withholding evidence of other events.
      There have been surprisingly few attacks on MM, considering his status; but of course the censorship by Jews and the state of American education explain that. I have an earlier link in my long file articles-on-jews largely looking at cuttingthroughthefog.com. — I recently saw an anti-Mathis link, provided by someone not known to me, claiming that Mathis's own family tree was connected to the Merovingians. However, the main point of Mathis is to show Jewish incursions into aristocracies, so I paid little attention. It may be, though, that his interest in genealogical research started with his own family and gave him practice in navigating ancestry websites.

Rae West   21 Oct & 1 & 5 Nov 2023.

Miles Mathis on 9/11. MM has many pieces including 911, mostly in passing, referring to other frauds. His latest piece, dated 3 or 4 March 2024, What Really Happened 911? is short (just over 5 pages) and sweet, with an overview of what happened. It does not include detail—it would be nice to know who planted the demolition charges, who did the media fakery and who got all those Jewish actors to read their scripts out, how the insurance companies were influenced to pay out. And what legal remedies are available. And whether legal remedies may apply in Iraq. But that's asking a lot. Meanwhile, this is an excellent summary.
      But Mathis understates the intricacies of Jewish power wordwide, in typically US fashion. It's not just US media that are corrupt, but most of the rest of the world, all of which fell in line. That means vast numbers of scribblers, video processors, diplomats, teachers and so-called academics, religious poseurs, administrators of population movements, advertisers. The insurance system by which Silverstein was paid automatically without investigation in effect treats the whole world's insurance payments as something to be dipped into. All the military structures are subservient to Jews—in Britain, the Attorney-General, a Jew, assured high rankers in the military that war would be legal. High-ranking military men in any case can be ignored and sidelined if required. Supposed ethical Church people are subordinate to the Prime Minister's selection of supposedly leading Archbishops. And so on.

      Techie note: For scanning bulk files, I recommend dtSearch, a desktop searcher which can look online too, or so it says—it's a typical techie product, with instructions written by people so familiar with their software they can't explain it.

Miles Mathis on Gaza.
  2024, Jan 3: all fake news. claudine.pdf (on this site). (Claudine refers to a joke US University).
  2023, Oct 7: isra.pdf (on my site, here; unlikely to be removed) is Miles on Gaza.   The ‘New York Post [says] Hamas is represented by New York attorney Stanley Cohen. My readers will get a big kick out of that name, and not just for the Cohen.’   Recently there was a supposed leak with 'Dracula' Greenblatt voicing his worries. Obviously a fake, pretending concern. What is in fact being done MM doesn't (I think) say, though obviously it will involve money. Maybe population movements; maybe weapons movements and dumps; maybe fixing more debt burdens on goyim.
      [March 2024] I (and others) received an email on this subject, its link reference being https://www.globalresearch.ca/israel-illegal-state-dr-ralph-wilde-icj/5850966 and which states that The Hamas attack of 7 October 2023 was planned at least 3 years before by the US, UK and Israel. Attributed to Dr Ralph Wilde and Peter Koenig.
      naft.pdf is Miles Mathis on November 27 2023 following up his piece with ‘Proof there are no Hostages in Gaza’
      It is truly disgusting to see the moronic whores of the BBC such as Fiona Bruce and Kathy Newman and the male-ish versions read out their anonymous scripts. — RW November 2023

Miles Mathis on Darwin.
His latest piece on Darwin, darw5.pdf, includes the Darwin/Wallace debate, if it can be called that; it barely exists, though I noticed Dawkins has inserted it a bit. I've written on this and Brackman, who seems to have pioneered it, in evolution in about 2010. Just as my nuke-lies forum piece, a forum which only still exists because I had the computer skills to save most of it, dates from 2012.
      Anyway Mathis has now five papers on Darwin, including his specialist and brilliant genealogies, of Wallace and many Victorians, including John Mill and John Stuart Mill. He looks into the ownership of the Westminster Review which most people (including me) had assumed was somewhat neutral. He has also a new idea (as far as I know) that the voyage of the Beagle must be an impossible fake, written up probably by others.
      Miles seems to lean towards the idea that Christianity was a natural part of later Rome—still promoted by academic and media hacks—as opposed to the view that Jews managed to control the Church with some difficulty, and that as it ballooned out, Jews wanted it back. He seems to have the ordinary USA view that belief in a 'God' is wonderful, and not just ridiculous funded fashionable bullshit waiting to be phased out.

UKRAINE/UKRANIA NOTES
[1] History. Russia has been compared to a huge sprawling mansion, but with just one tiny front door. Apart from St Petersburg on the Baltic (often cold), the Crimea is their only European warm-water port, and even that was difficult, since before the Suez Canal it was a long route through the Black Sea and Mediterranean. This probably explains the 19th century Crimean War, a naval power thing.
    The area had a huge Jew-enforced famine in the 1930s. As a result, many welcomed the 'Nazis' in WW2, without knowing that Jews ran them in addition. All this is suppressed; if the Jew media, including the BBC etc, don't mention this, you can be sure it's just more Jew propaganda.
    There are many Jews from Ukraine in the USA (e.g. Bob Dylan/Zimmermann). These are just one Jewish group with interests in the region.

2. Present. Ukraine has borders with and/or populations of Germans, Poles, Georgians, Russians etc. Each of these has their Jewish component, fairly fluent in the local languages, and of course with news media there, and local groups of the Freemason types, running supposed political parties. And fed mostly by US Fed printed money. So the situation is of the type found in Ireland and Spain when there were supposed sectarians, only more complicated. There's scope for e.g. taking over assets, destroying old areas for reconstruction for gain, war equipment profiteering, bogus political parties, and other typical Jewish activities. That's all I can confidently say, except that nuke threats are a fraud.

---

3. Added later. I suspect, though I have no direct evidence, that revisionism must have taken some hold in the Ukraine, with far more cause than in western Europe. If Jews decide to relocate, maybe with their sidekicks and subordinates, Putin makes a good joke threat. Bear in mind that Jews after winning the Second World War have installed themselves in all hierarchies, so Putin is just as much a Jew ally as Trump, Biden, Macron, Trudeau, Boris Osman and the rest. Many people seeing the media circus of faux outrage against Trump or Putin may take it seriously; in fact, 'conservative' Jewish scum have little choice but do something of the sort. Watching BBC whores of the Chakrabarti or Fiona Bruce or Sophie Raworth type, reading out their anonymous scripts accompanied by their Jew-approved non-British monkeys, and watching the appeals for non-Jews to take in 'refugees' with no questions asked, plus the occasional video from visitors showing no fighting, and the occasional obviously insincere pleas from people like Martin Bell on Afghans and Yemenis. The fake war idea seems most likely.
      Miles Mathis in effect identifies some wars as being essentially faked, typically to hide a takeover or regime change. But there are serious wars too.
-RW 3 3 2022 & 20 3 2022

The government doesn't want you to think you have the right to feel any real emotions, or, worse, to act on them. If you feel mad or sad or even happy, they want you to think you have gone mental. They want you to believe the only sane response to the world is a flat acceptance. Even a shrug of the shoulders is suspect, because it indicates you may be hiding your true feelings. You aren't allowed any true feelings.
      That is what "bi-polar" is telling you .... They are trying to sell you the idea that mood swings are unnatural. Just as they have labeled kids' natural energy as ADHD, they have labeled adults' natural moods as bi-polar. People ... have mood swings... People are supposed to feel both happy and sad, provided they have some reason to feel either way. Life ... provides highs and lows in abundance, so we should look sideways at people who do not have mood swings, not those who do.

MY VIDEO (LEFT) outlines Mathis to learner revisionists, in an hour. The site searcher (above) is useful for locating his analyses, as he has 500+ papers and there's a lot of overlap in the contents. So please use the searcher! It has more detail than online searchers such as Google.

NEWCOMERS to Mathis: He writes on art, on society/history, and science. His early essays dealt only with art. Then he wrote on Obama; but his first distinctive piece was Where Do Your Taxes Go? dated 18th/8/2011. I think this can be taken as the starting-point of his revisionist work. (Not 'revolutionary', which has irrelevant associations.) His technique is not very computer-aware, except for skill in examining genealogical sites.
      I suspect, but don't know, that he was picked up and made use of by the owner of cuttingthroughthefog.com, who appears to be a Jewish criminologist (really!) who never allows comment by me. So we find exposés of Jewish history and long-term intrusions by Jews, and material on Russia, the USA, Europe, China, and Japan, combined with suspiciously light material exonerating war crimes and omitting some regions of history—US Civil War? Thirty Years War? Nuclear frauds?
      His work on science looks highly promising, but I've not been able to get him to talk about it. Nor has anybody else., as far as I know.

6 May 2020: We have a new piece on Isaac Newton! There's less on astronomy and science than I'd have guessed, and more on ancestry (including Odin!) and housing, and intelligence, with Newton as the equivalent of 'N' of MI5, and carrying out several projects, such as promoting Arianism as a divisive project, and alchemy as manufacture of gold, though my guess is this must have been attempts at extraction and purification. Mathis has taken some trouble over predecessors of Newton in telescopes and mathematics and the inverse square law, which surely is rather obvious, the area of a sphere's surface being the square of the distance from its centre. Some of this material must have been borrowed, but its his choice not to mention such things. He's good on a large range of topics, including creation of colleges, academic appointments, coats of arms, Catholic property takeovers, portraits, 'chai', Whigs and Tories as fake opposition, and huge frauds such as the South Sea Bubble usually attributed to Law. Mathis doesn't think much of calculus, and claims to have a much-improved version. I'm not sure (and I have a maths degree).
      Wonderful Mathis at his best.

It occurs to me that such people as Joseph Priestley (of carbon dioxide and oxygen) and the Lunar Circle/ Society must have had an infusion of 'intelligence' in the spy sense: the 'French' revolution occurred in the middle of its existence. Surely something similar must be true of Lavoisier ('the voice', perhaps) and his chemistry and execution, real or supposed? Look for Freemasons and Jews.

NEWCOMERS to Mathis: Worth reading: Henry Ford as controlled opposition. Dearborn Independent as an obvious source for information on Jews. Some of this in hexzane527's writings.
      Note that Lindbergh came from a whole genealogy of frauds, apparently Jews from Sweden. His fake plane was advertising for air transport promoted with a book. The baby murder was probably faked; not a murder at all, but avoiding an embarrassing surplus child. Mathis doesn't examine Lindbergh's oratory; he just states 'It is more likely his speeches were simply a pose, made to manufacture the opposition.'
      Note that Lindbergh as indirectly promoting war with Germany is not as far as I know in Mathis. I haven't found, even in Hexzane527, an interpretation of Lindbergh as controlled opposition, something Kevin MacDonald would hate.

NEWCOMERS to Mathis: please look at his 15 March 2020 piece here phoenper.pdf —Where Did All the Phoenicians Go?   A brilliant piece encompassing much of prehistory, so far as it survives in writings—including the Odyssey, Hittites and the iron age and monopoly of iron, Troy and iron and silver in what's now Turkey, Persia, the Phoenician and later alphabets, Alexander of Macedon, Thucydides and other liar-historians, Sparta, and the likely-true histories of many more-or-less mythical names from the ancient Greeks. And rearrangements of wars and battles, deleting doubtful wars and reinterpreting changes in 'elites'.
      It's useful to be reminded that iron was a serious improvement (or 'improvement') in weapons technology. (If you don't believe me, watch videos on knife and machete killings. Here's 'Warlords of Mexico'). In its day, iron working must have had a similar affect to the invention of gunpowder.
    I'd be particularly pleased if classicists could do serious work, though this would no doubt exclude the Mary Beard type.

Newcomers might look at guru.pdf, What I Finally Understood. Not everything, but the famous people, ALL there to misdirect you. He's mostly talking about people like Chomsky and Lyndon La Rouche. Includes well-worth-reading description of TV discussions on gun control in the US, with material on Smith and Wesson and its ownership and sales. This is tactics rather than strategy, easier to understand and at a lower level than Jewish and Freemason long-term policies.
      Sidenote on art dealers as money-launderers and promoters of fashions and fakes: this is part of Mathis' attitude to the 'art' world. Worth noting that Ernst Hanfstaegel, son of a Munich art dealer, and himself an art dealer in 45th St and 5th Avenue, seems to have been involved in financing Hitler and disliking the 'Allies' in 1916.
      (Which remind me of 'Brexit' discussions on the BBC in Britain, with godawful actresses reading their scripts; no overview information ever, and in any case Brexit must have been decided—since there are never 'debates' on important issues such as population replacement or wars. For Brexit as a long-term Jewish part of World War 3, see Hexzane527).

Dec 10th 2019 has a piece by Leaf Gerrit (I haven't attempted to check if that's a real name) on a faked Greensboro massacre, in 1979. I liked the piece, which looks at a Jewish-owned denim cloth mill, where protestors were swamped by fake KKK and other types, with a faked shooting, effectively wrecking the protest. Includes Maoists and joke tombstones and family relationships. (I think the nuke stuff is wrong, however).

TWO NEW TOPICS (Oct 2019) are meuse.pdf.   Its Title is: The Battle of France which examines the official World War 2 story of the 'fall of France' in a few days. Just a small part of the huge war. It's impossible to guess how long it will be before the war is untangled; if it ever is, since of course Jews love lying. It's not a new idea; but it's new to have detailed analysis. My site big-lies.org also has my piece big-lies.org/how-master-race-won-ww2/ (long) and big-lies.org/hexzane527/ (from a French site).
      and MWM has new pieces on Norway and its oil money, royal family, and campaigns to spend money on weapons, and hand it to big organisations. MWM seems to know more about royalty than royalty know themselves.

REPRISE (((British))) media are repeating their rubbish about the Nov 3, 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue fake shooting. Includes rich array of number markers, and Trump's alleged reactions, suggesting it's a Jewish attempt at a fake war. Plus genealogy and biog. (Repeated from the list below).

Cuba and the 1962 'nuclear crisis' and Guantanamo: MWM deduces from the fact that Castro and Guevara were rich 'marrano' Jews, and there's at least one US military base on Cuba, that the whole thing (including Guantanamo) is faked for the Jewish media.

Dresden bombing. Interesting piece showing MWM's originality: the possibility that Dresden might have been used for propaganda, rather as the fire-bombing or Hiroshima wand Nagasaki were used. Looking at supposed photos (mummified or old remains; fake of Dresden after bombing, according to MWM though I was uncertain, it may have been exaggerated. Possibly in my view as a distraction away from such things as Eisenhower's Rhine murder fields.

Lindbergh. I noticed TheOccidentalObserver had a comment on Lindbergh, accepting the myths (also in The Culture of Critique). Type Lindbergh into my search box; there are at least ten separate pieces to that puzzle.

Lithuania. Here's a good example of a topic which is generally unfamiliar in the west, but has powerful lessons for students of Jewish infiltration. (Dalia Grybauskaité of Lithuania seems to be a present-day Jew in the fashion of Merkel and May). Lithuania has been in the mid-distant past a far larger country than now; don't underestimate it. Use the search engine above to burrow into its history, in particular of royal lines where vast transfers of land were possible.
      Poland of course is another target for revisionism; it has been through many changes, with its vague boundaries. Poland had more 'Jews' than any other country at one time. Venice, Italy and the Medici family; France and the 'Revolution' and Napoleon another; Russia and its aristocracies another.

The box immediately below has some explanations of hiller.pdf, lenin.pdf, and trump.pdf, plus the Harry Potter Hoax, a paper on the Bushes, and a series of papers linked by one large subject. For people new to Miles Mathis, wanting to ease themselves in. For a surprise try his Stalin paper, stalin.pdf. at this date (19 Apr 2019) his most recent paper—though six days later it barely shows on google. v. 2019-April-26 v. 2019-Aug-09 v. 2019-Sep-10 v. 2019-Oct-26 v. 2019-Dec-13 v. 2020-Jan-20 v. 2020-Jan-26 v. 29 Feb 2020 v. 11 Mar 2020 v. 19 March 2020 v.1 May 2020 v. 6 May 2020 v. 28-Jun-2020 v. 10-Jul-2020 v. 2-Oct-2020 v. 28-Dec-2020 v. 1-Apr-2021 v. 19-Jul-2021 v. 2 Aug 2021 v. 14 Sep 2021 v. 23 Nov 2021

911, 9/11 I've seen it claimed that Miles has no opinion on 911. In fact, searching for 911 yields link.html, strike.pdf (911 and Obama's birth), parrish.html, chom.html (2006 emails), naomi.pdf, 911.html (links to seven papers on 911; including the chomsky one), rs.pdf, barindex2.pdf—those are just the first eight. His html papers tend to be old; maybe they were undiscovered by superficial 911 searchers. hiller.pdf   Important and highly original piece on ancestry of 'Nazis' (Germans heading the NSDAP) and their name changes. 'Hiller' as likely real name of Hitler, and plenty of evidence on Goebbels and other rich members of the so-called Workers' Party. Mathis maintains that the entire Beer Hall putsch was a fake. (In my opinion, in view of what Jews did to Germany, Hitler was moderate, which would explain his support; the Holohoax material was made up later, to hide Jewish war crimes). lenin.pdf   Lenin - was Russia partly run by Jew 'aristocrats'? Highly original view of the 'Russian Revolution' or Jew d'état. Takes the view that the 'Russian' aristocracy had already been invaded by Jews. And that the whole story of the 'Revolution'—Kronstadt sailors, and Rosa Luxemburg, for example—was a staged fake. (It occurred to me that Russia may have been covertly taken over with the fall of the Godunovs, but I haven't attempted any work on this. And it was suggested to me that there was a secret 'Balfour Declaration', secretly partitioning Russia). trump.pdf   Donald Trump presented as another Jew or crypto-Jew, with fakery of many kinds, including in vote-counting. There may be items here that Mathis has spotlit, possibly unbeknown to himself. One is his assessment that the whole voting system is more or less faked, which he claims to have proved mathematically potter.pdf   The Great Harry Potter Hoax (May 2016 + later bit(s)) is an interesting introduction to Mathis's work. He says his method is to start with some likely topic, which, if he finds a few red flags, he then pursues, mostly from online sources. Usually these are more-or-less public: war crimes, mass murders, immense frauds, deep swindles, genocides are generally hidden from everyone. His view from Texas shows Britain in an unfamiliar light, with for example Bristol and King's Cross in north London as hubs of secret military and intelligence establishments. He neatly ties together the BBC, Guardian, Rothschilds, and Bloombury Publishing and people like Salz. In my view he leaves 'fascist' unanalysed. He thinks Rowling was probably a front for a team of writers ('word niggers' in US English), charged among other things with ensuring that most people ('muggles') are a separate caste from the enlightened wizardry, who have tricks to baffle and confuse the populace. This of course is similar to the 'chosen people', 'elect', and so on, though Miles doesn't labour the point. He is unimpressed by the publicly-available information on Rowling, and rampages through accumulated BS, including Scottish ancestry and faked photos, which, as a portraitist, he identifies with great confidence.       I recommended potter.pdf as a sample of Miles Mathis' work, on a popular subject. He doesn't speculate as to why powerful organisations should put so much energy into children's books and film. Probably, along with the invention of the propagandist Independent, it was to distract from mass deaths and destruction in Iraq and Afghanistan. Vast audiences watching (((English))) actors is one way to do it.       Rowling's subsequent work (e.g. with a black African social worker spreading her wisdom to whites) is standard Jews stuff, as far as I've bothered to look.   Roger Waters is found in pratt.pdf, bush.pdf, and mlk.pdf and other files. Roger Waters said in a Norwegian interview that he came from a north London middle-class family, middlemen in 'fancy goods'. Art dealers? Clothes importers? Who knows. North London has many 'Jews'; I'd expect Mathis' belief that Waters thinks he's a Jew is correct. I noted down some of what Waters said in his interview: “... all human beings are descended from the first Homo sapiens - who were from Africa - and we have spread out all over the globe to different parts of the globe - we look different, but that's caused by weather and other things that have happened to us - we are all related one to another - we all carry the same DNA - we are all related - we are brothers and sisters...” which sounds Jewish, ignoring the genetics of aggression, and possible evolutions into parasitism. 'Brothers and sisters' hundreds of thousands of years apart?—H G Wells said exactly the same thing; possibly Waters is echoing some childhood reading.       Waters mentions endless wars, but not Jewish paper money since 1913. Pink Floyd's work can be read, rather irritatingly, as insisting on children not wanting education, adults wasting their lives in dull days, people being bored by accounts, and knowing nothing about Talmudic stuff and inherited religious absurdities. The Wall says 'the wall' should be smashed down—but does not mention that there are boundaries between races. Its entire treatment of WW2 is the death of the father of the boy in war, but omits heavy bombing of Germany, and Jew mass murder in the USSR/Russia, and of course has black and red livery.   Just my guess: Watching some 'Rolling Stones' (pop group) videos, including Andrew Loog Oldham explicitly identified as a Jew, it occurred to me that both the 1965 Berlin concert and the 1969 Altamont 'Free Concert' might have been psyops. (MWM has not written on these; I think he has more interest in US music). Berlin was of course under full Jew control and with massive numbers of informers. They must have known the males to be there, and no doubt choreographed the action, as with 'Antifa' rentboys now. MWM wrote about Manson (Aug 1969) and Kent State (May 1970) and their fake killings. Similarly with Altamont in Dec 1969; many US 'free' things are automatically suspect, for example the free New Yorker issue to promote the fake of Hiroshima, as may be the supposed deaths and the supposed Hell's Angels. And the free TV 'moon landing' fake of July 1969. Perhaps Brian Jones murder (1969) had some overlooked Jewish link.       Keith Richards' presentation as a long-term druggie immune from the normal effects of drugs must be suspect. The androgynous presentations of Jagger and other things suggest Jew psyops. I suppose Jagger might be a 'gay' surrounded by a distracting forest of sex stories. While Vietnam was being bombed and burned, and attacked by chemical warfare, and the women raped, the Rolling Stones, NASA, and the 'intelligence' 'services' ponced around.   The Dreyfus Affair (c. 1894-1906) was a mostly French blackwash reversal trick, to condemn Jews, then follow up with a fake 'reveal' continued until a high enough percentage of the gullible were convinced of Jewish innocence. Bertrand Russell believed the innocence story (see Dear Bertrand Russell), even after two world wars and Jewish destruction of Russians and Germans. Hilaire Belloc noted its propaganda force, but as far as I know accepted the idea. The pdf Dreyfus is very well worth reading. The media techniques are different now, which makes it relatively easy to take an unbiased view.     The author of the piece is recorded as Josh G, a Jew. He misses what may have been the distraction of Dreyfus from France's cruel militarism in Indo-Chine, i.e. Indo-China, Vietnam and Cambodia, and north Africa. His piece may have been a bit of promo for a museum in France, presumably a Jewish thing.   I've just relocated bush.pdf   I think the first record of all the (((American))) Presidents being Jews. Dated 26 Sept 2017. Note that a young girl is on the 'mainstream' junk media as having discovered all but one presidents are related (to an English monarch of long ago; Jews and Freemasons not mentioned of course). I'm just checking—12 yr old BridgeAnne d’Avignon, 'helped' by her granddad, is quoted, dated August 2015. And of course aristocratic genealogies have been compiled since the inventions of writing. But I'd guess Miles Mathis may be the first to state and provide evidence for Jewish common roots or beliefs. Not in the junk media, of course.   phoen.pdf   Ancient Spooks. In 5 Parts by Gerry, from Germany. Here's what may be a very important series, in five parts, aiming to discover who the original Mediterranean-based people were, who invented global-ish shipping trade. Notable for the huge span of time—many thousands of years.       22 sep 2020 - Gerry has a site ancient-spooks.de       Gerry uses images from Internet, for example showing museum exhibits to throw light on hand gestures, clothing, and assorted iconography. And aerial photos and maps of islands. He includes textual analysis in Egyptian and related languages, and looks at verbal puns, showing them in the 'Old Testament'—this looks highly original to me.       And includes what may have been ordinary flies, judging by the wing shape of the metal artefacts, suggesting 'Lord of the Flies' referred to the boss of flies-on-the-wall, presumably quiet, ignored, spooks. These seem to have been promoted later to gold bees. We also have cedars of Lebanon, ideal for shipbuilding and not available in Egypt. And islands, a topic on MWM who refers often to the Isle of Man, Anglesey, Zanzibar (of Muslim slave dealers). Here we have Mediterranean islands, Sardinia for example. And colonies on the shores of the Mediterranean, in Spain for example. Plus what's known of these towns' names.       The conclusion isn't new: these people were Phoenicians. I think the suggestion is that Jews lived near, and may have taken over (perhaps with later money gained in eastern Europe). Thus thalassocracies, plus European geographic regions, plus oriental land routes made the northern part of the old world. Subdivisions were fairly natural, until synthetic, made-up empires and religions and currencies and wars came along. Or something like that. A few more, at random: Irvin and Seeliger, on gnosticmedia, trying to discuss the Salem 'witch trials', whom Mathis detects as from rich families, with a standardised logo and unimpressive thinking and speaking styles. (Much of Mathis' work is involved in disentangling family relationships, often from aristocratic families, where there tends to be money and interest in establishing ancestry—and concealing it; Alamo (by DK and LG) and Mexico ‘... the Alamo kicked off the Texas Revolution and the establishment of the Republic of Texas as a sovereign nation. A mere ten years later, Texas was annexed by the U.S., which triggered the Mexican-American War.’ Or that's the official view, but our intrepid revisionists find reasons to believe much of the narrative must be untrue. (Eat your heart out, Phil Collins!). aoc.pdf has material on various Spaniards/Marrano Jews, including Don Quixote's author. Ted Bundy as a TV star mass killer (bundy2.pdf) appears to be yet another well-connected actor. The OK Corral 'wasn't even known about until the 1930s...' Rosa Luxemburg in fact a Jew from Poland; another Jewish supposed 'left-wing' hero. Ezra Pound appears in several pdfs, and is outed as a probable 'spook'. vote.pdf looks at election fraud; Miles has what seems an extreme view, which seems to be that Trump is several actors. President Woodrow Wilson (puppet of Jews, made to push the USA into war), Eugene Debs, Goldman Sachs, Warburgs and eventual USA Central Bank, Cuba as a Jew-controlled fake, John Reed in reed.pdf ...       Here's a meta-op noted by Miles Mathis: mandela.pdf, the so-called Mandela Effect. It has other names, for example the Berenstain Bears pseudo-phenomenon. This may be an intentional move to persuade people their memories are faulty—in practice, usually what Jews don't want. mandela3.html looks at the lack of braces on the teeth of a James Bond film girl (the HTML format allows animation). Anyone who uses (say) Google to search, may fall foul of some algorithm which includes these supposed anomalies. It's typical of the low-grade Jewish adolescent mind that the supposed effect is 'explained' by 'time lines' getting mixed up, or something: Einstein, nuclear weapons, and NASA have given Jews considerable faith in the gullibility of most 'goyim'. And it's largely justified. Please, please poke around. I've set the site searcher to a long setting, to give a good feeling for the contents of the pdf files.       May I recommend, to anyone interested in deep revisionism, that you download some or all of these pdfs? They may become targets of censors.

I first read Miles Mathis in 2014—I'm sure, because I emailed him on 15th September in some excitement. Some of his methods and results are incorporated in big-lies.org. Examples: In big-lies/jews, here Online sites and methods In big-lies.org/jews/articles-on-jews, here The Battle Against Miles Mathis with some online emails from critics In The 'Master Race' Won WW2, here More on Miles' methods Here's a mention of the three-way war between Jews, Catholics, and Protestants in early-christianity-bible.html This piece on Jews in Sweden berg.pdf looks at Ingrid Bergman and (obscure, anti-Christian film director) Ingmar Bergman. Many, many family and Jew interconnections. Incidental sidelights include E Michael Jones These examples are biased to 'Jews'; but there are many diverse topics. Note: my site is not a complete one. I'm unsure in fact how to proceed. It's possible his site might be removed. But I do hope I'm helping people understand the importance of Miles Mathis and his encouragingly high number of associates.  : Alexa (which doesn't reveal the source(s) of its figures) seems to have been working against intelligent websites. Or maybe Google etc have been working overtime to stuff in junk sites and fake many hits onto them.

---

Miles Williams Mathis.   One of the Foremost Revisionist Intellectuals Today?

[Back to top of this page]

It seems that 'Josh', presumably Dr Joshua Guetzkow, at some Jewish Institute of Criminology has complete editing control over posts to cuttingthroughthefog, the only site Mathis posts on; who knows how much good material has been lost? Miles has written about Josh in 2017 in Piece of Mindful inconclusively. By searching for josh guetzkow with 2017 and other years, I found new1.pdf seems another piece by Miles including Josh. But what's said about Dreyfus shows this huge hoax, which deceived Belloc and Russell and no doubt countless others, was revealed to goyim by Josh. I've just seen (via facebook!) that he has a long article on 'COVID' and censorship here. Guess what: it has no mention anywhere of Jewish ownership and control of the media. (including Springer Verlag). And probably (it's loooong) nothing on money-making 'medicine' and the resulting debt. The co-authors seem to be all Jews, except perhaps Brian Martin, in Australia.
      Or how much material originated from Israel. It's impossible to know; but let me ask some legitimate questions:

      On Jewish fantasies, of the Talmudic and more obscure sort that Bjerknes does his best to reveal, there's nothing in Miles.
      On history, if Miles takes material from Jewish sources, the natural expectation is that Jewish crimes will be unmentioned. And indeed there's nothing (or little) on major wars (WW1 and WW2. THE US Civil War includes many of the leaders—Lincoln for example—but not much on Jews' activities in the USA, despite the high chance they helped cause it) but rather on the sort of thing minimising violence—Jews in China and Japan (new to me) but emphasis on non-existent battles rather than heavy bombing and firebombing. The Chinese translation of How Jews Took Over China attributed to 'Josh' is top of my admittedly small list of translated files. Something tells me the forgotten facts of large-scale killings play no part in that article.
      Nuclear issues are barely represented in Miles, except for one not very original piece on (from memory) supposed tests in the Pacific. He seems to claim to have originated the whole nuke crit idea, which is easily disproved and therefore a worryingly silly. He never refers to nukelies on my site, which has been there for a similar time to his material. Although I helped moderate it, the nuke material has at least eight good contributors. My part is largely the skill needed to rebuild most of it after Jesse Waugh removed it. Miles hasn't mentioned the criticism of Darwin from the viewpoint of Wallace, which I presume he got from my site. And he hasn't discussed my article (with Phil Holland) on problems with physics.
      Similarly, Miles says nothing about the Vietnam War—or the rubbish online from 'veterans' and others; VT (I think it's called) recently ran a piece saying the US is robbed by overseas countries! As an excuse to no mention Jews. The point is that the evidence for Jews paying US war criminals for atrocities is avoided, possibly systematically, by Miles.
      On economics and politics, he's had little on actual frauds and methods. His FTX piece ridicules Bankman-Fried, reasonably enough, but shows little Jewish input. Nothing on who was swindled. As with the Dreyfus Case, there's a lot on how clever and multiple-media it was, but little on the effects of Jewish actions.
      On biology, there's been little by Mathis on COVID. Which of course is consistent with Jewish suppression of what non-Jews view as criminal corruption.
      It's possible that Miles' science writings (some in books; some online) came from Jewish sources, of which there must be masses of secret evidence. I don't suppose I'll ever know, as he annoyingly won't discuss.

I don't want to make a complaints list here (I did something of the sort with Kevin McDonald) but as far as I know all his new ideas must be suspected of being mediated through Jews. Maybe they pay his rent; who knows. So be aware of that; watch for it. And have a 'joyful holy day season'.

Possibly, though this may sound odd, he still thinks he's young. But his days are numbered, with not a very high number. He's noticed he's being censored, and has started re-posting old articles; but these in turn may be ignored. I wish he'd talk!

---

Miles Mathis contd.

[Back to top of this page]

I'm not connected with Miles Mathis, except in the sense of aiming for truth. I never met or spoke, and rarely communicated, with him. I wish he'd talk online, but he simply doesn't. (I've texted/emailed with many people—on diet, physics, nuclear stuff, education, religions, history, biology—but most are equally unchatty). And I'm uneasy with the poor quality of what seems to be his only supporting website, cuttingthroughthefog.com (which I criticised as addingtothefog.com).

My difficulty with Miles Mathis is what I see as his lack of exposure. He's been told he gets large numbers of downloads from his site. But he seems not to know that many of these may be junk visits—from 'spooks' or unemployable Jews or timewasters—or people looking for new ideas, or looking for ideas to combat. (My own site's nuclear truth has never been mentioned, that I know of. It's certainly censored in Japan). He says that his Abraham Lincoln piece sparked off some counter-activity, as did his piece on Stephen Hawking. He was probably right; but as far I know received not an iota of publicity for himself. Very few sites list him in their 'blogrolls', however relevant his work is. Kevin MacDonald's site is typical in this respect. It's painful to see websites posing as serious that show no knowledge of Mathis.
      Very few people are able to put in the work needed to examine an author as prolific as Mathis and his co-writers. Online attemps, such as RationalWiki, are laughably weak. Nor will they debate. For many people this is hard to explain. In fact it's a common pattern. Supposed experts, under the Jewish 'education' system, risk everything by debate. I've seen this watching the late Dr Harold Hillman, who, despite great efforts, could never get serious debate with any medical researchers—including both the journalistic types (such as Richard Dawkins or Susan Greenfield) and academic and medical researchers. Supporters of Edward de Vere never engaged in debates with conventional believers in 'the Stratford Man'. Nobody discusses Jane Austen with Nick Ennos. Same with Darwin supporters vs A R Wallace, and conventional Pasteur medicos vs. others.
      On Harold Hillman, I've personally supported his work online; if you've heard of Hillman, it's because of me. I saw that cuttingthroughthefog.com refers to sites which have learned from me about Hillman, but keep this secret. This is Jewish behaviour.
      There are almost endless lightweight supporters of Jews. Some are Jews doing what they've always done, not sheeple so much as hyenas and lampreys. Many others are rented crowd-filler types, of the sort funded by Schwartz/George Soros: 'Black Lives Matter' is typical. These types are not new; Edward Gibbon mentions them in his book on the Roman Empire, though without being very clear.
      But these are tepid issues compared with Jew-related issues, including money, wars, official religions, freemasons, historical events, and long-term censorship. 'Holocaust revisionism' and 'pogrom revisionism' are two issues which have become popularised through Internet since about 2000. In my opinion, one of the trickiest topics is Second World War revisionism, where Jews make huge efforts to conceal the likely truth. Takeovers of entire countries—Spain, Netherlands, England, the USA, the Russian empire, China—and those are just relatively recent—are lied about to nearly the same level.
      The present world system for up to thousands of years has relied on many components: 1 literacy, since communication is needed over distances; 2 money, which allows power to be concentrated, at present largely as paper money controlled by Jews; 3 some technical control, which is usually carried out by (in effect) mercenaries; 4 laws and legalism, since property rights in such assets as land and mines need fairly precise control; 5 fairly efficient travel which for aeons meant ships, but now has roads, rail, canals, and air; and 6 'education', which involves propaganda on a huge scale. 9 Secrecy is hugely important; judging by the past, effective opposition to Jews and associated parasitisms will only emerge from secret organisations.
      I doubt if any of these things were ever controlled very accurately. Radio and film and TV must I think have been tried out and experimented with empirically. I don't think anyone could have predicted confidently that masses of people could be fooled into believing in life after death, or that actors and oratory work, or collapsing towers, or COVID.
      In my view there are technical reasons for impending changes in outlook. An important fact is the increased recognition of digital technologies. The vast combinatorial possibilities of atoms and molecules, of DNA, of large numbers of people and their interactions, make statistical approaches to problems potentially important; not just simple calculations. Leibniz and Newton point the way, by their advances over arithmetic, to new types of understanding. Artificial intelligence hasn't (as far as I know) done much so far; climate modelling has potential, though, as has happened in all sciences, it has been handicapped by Jewish interference. This sort of thing is not very interesting to many people, including Miles, though he does look into mathematics. There must be breakthroughs waiting to analyse the proportion of assets shanghaied by Jews, for example. Identification of Jewish sectors would be a step forward, something like the invention of national income accounts.

      As regards Jews, please understand that they constitute a distributed nation, scattered around the world, but concentrated in some cities and towns. Don't be taken in by the claims they are only a tiny percentage. This is easy to overlook; most people don't know, or care, or understand that there are bunches of Jews in different places with similar attitudes. In each town they inhabit, they tend to the 'Kahal' system, run by Rabbis, in which they secretly arrange to target local 'goy' victims, the right to act depending on payments to Rabbis. Where secrecy is not possible, they organise a few local people on the Freemasonry principle. This principle includes religions; Christianity and Islam were both founded by Jews and collaborated with them, while pretending not to. When they seem to have sucked what they can from the locals, they may move, sometimes making a lot of noise in the process, often enough not in fact moving, and often enough secretly supported by nobility and educators. For example, Christianity was based on land ownership and many local priests, and education in western Europe was mostly a matter of training promising youngsters in Latin and the Bible.

Anyway. How intelligently does Miles Mathis deal with these issues? In my view, very well indeed. He seems aware of all the issues. None of his critics that I've seen begin to address them. Some issues are very difficult to tackle, for example the question of how many people count as 'Jews', and how many crypto-Jews and collaborators there are. How come Jews with privately-owned assets are kept from exposure, while ordinary people are expected to declare everything? How common is child abuse and trafficking of women among Jews? Are all people in the public eye Jews? How dependent are religions on Jewish 'money'? This sort of thing will remain controversial, perhaps for centuries. What about deaths, famine, disease? It's clear that many decisions on these topics have been made by Jews. It's necessary that non-Jews consider such topics seriously. What view does Mathis take? He discusses faked excuses for wars, but doesn't overview the whole system. But very few thinkers do.

I'll try to explain where I think Miles has gone adrift. This seems the responsibility of cuttingthroughthefog.com. Looking at dates and figures, I think that site contacted Miles relatively recently and established good relations by buttering up Miles—praising his site, praising his downloads, and so on. I suspect Miles felt isolated and responded with some elation. What information I have (from Simon Shack's site) suggests Josh G is a minor academic in Israel.
      I first noticed Josh G in a piece or two on the Dreyfus Affair, which in about 1900 was a huge affair discussed throughout Europe. I knew this from my burrowings into the writings of Bertrand Russell and Hilaire Belloc. It came as a relief to me to read Josh G's view, claiming (or showing) that the whole thing was a pro-Jew psyop, and a very modern one at the time, using the new media of film, and cheap newsprint. But it suggested further questions. The reason for inventing the Dreyfus Affair was to sweep Jewish frauds under the carpet, by making 'anti-Semitism' unmentionable in polite society. But Jewish frauds in France included immense company frauds (to do with overseas canals). Other Jewish topics (of many) included the Boer Wars, European murders by Jews calling themselves 'anarchists', the build-up to the Great War, the formation of the ADL, and the USA Federal Reserve. Josh G failed to address these issues at all. Suggesting to the critical mind that he was and is just a distraction, giving information probably widely-known to Jews, and probably regarded by them as old and stale.
      Another perhaps one-off oddity is skinhead.pdf, dated Nov 10th 2016, by an anonymous contributor, perhaps in England. It's an odd piece, based round someone called James Moffat, author under many pseudonyms of many junk books. And junk publishers. What interested me was accusations against Britons Publishing and Arnold Leese. Without going into detail, the anonymous article talks of the 'taint of racism'. Much of this looks correct, but with some sideswipes which of course are typical of infiltrator types. (I just watched an irritating TV thing with a Pakistani woman pretending her heritage was Yorkshire; something similar).
      Miles has spent much effort on exposing 'serial killers' as generally fraudulent 'intelligence' operations. But he talks of whites in these frauds, no doubt helping white women feel insecure. But Miles (or his Jewish influencers) has failed to notice the very high rate of murders by blacks. It's fairly certain that Jews, with their policy of understating black crime, are part of the fraud to invite white serial killers. But they carefully fail to mention black serial killers. In a similar way, Miles must know about white multiple killers in wars: consider the US Civil War, WW1 and WW2, Korea and Vietnam. Miles must know about large scale killings, but omits them—they were not in CONUS, after all. He doesn't seem to realise that there is a lot of sound reasoning in favour of the idea of whites as killers. Jews, if they feel the time is ripe, will fan the embers in non-whites.
      Another troubling piece is protocols.pdf, dated April 25 2015. Miles says (I think) that they were composed by aristocrats, as a warning or description of the possible horrors of financial power. He doesn't like the idea that they were jotted down by some Tsarist spy, while in a Jewish planning meeting. Given the possibilities of events at Kahals, the jottings or reconstructing notes idea sounds very plausible to me. Miles looks at the Protocol dealing with God, though what he says doesn't convince me. Miles also says To start with, they are trying to pin everything on the Jews, but we know that all the top financiers are not Jews. That's one point at issue, and seems to conflict with other Mathisian writings, that every important person is in the Phoenician Navy. So why would the aristocrats imply they are? Because some of the top financiers are Gentiles who ditched the aristocracy and put their cards in with the new money... says Miles. Well, maybe that just includes Crypto-Jews and High-Level Freemasons and some others. Anyway, he goes into a long account of appealing to latent feelings of approval in the super-wealthy, and waxes lyrical on all the stolen trillions, as though paper money made from nothing can continue separated from ideas of land and asset ownership.
      Miles' writings sometimes take a mystical turn in which he exhorts the baddies to relax, stop being greedy, and stop or reduce their predatory looting. They'll live longer, and be better looking, and have less need for violence. I think he tends to confuse looting with ownership; buying-out corporations with paper money isn't exactly looting. And he seems to like a vague religious spirit.

Anyway, these are worrying issues. But there are others, such as the accusation that Miles is soft on Jews, with a hidden agenda to whitewash them. He has said nothing on nuclear frauds, which he may or may not understand. He has an alter ego of science interests, and presumably should include nuclear power as a Jewish fraud, with huge implications for the future, including the possibility that electrical power will diminish and fail, and that coal and gas will be ruined by Jewish machinations. A related incident is censorship from Japan, probably to reduce Japanese awareness of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki frauds.
      Miles is perhaps a minority interest because he says little on mundane everyday topics, preferring the high ground. He doesn't say much on selective use by Jews of money: in the UK, white mothers have been jailed for not paying their TV 'licence', but illegal immigrants are given houses and 'white goods' and have their rents paid. The 'Labour Party' is run by Jews and promotes things like benefits for illegal immigrants, while whites are housed in slums without hope of housing. Immigrants are paid for doing nothing, more than workers in Britain are paid; I'd guess so the ugly Jewish bosses want to promote race mixing with poor whites. Miles says that Jews steal money worldwide at faster than ever rates, but leaves it as an abstract proposition. This seems a fair criticism to me; I'd have liked to discuss it.
      It's possible (perhaps through Jewish influences. I remember the claim that Eric Blair/ George Orwell was handled at all times by a bunch of Jews) that Miles understates military violence by 'Allies'. Some anti-war sites are 'white guilt' sites, careful to omit Jew profiteering. Because of censorship, it's a difficult issue. I've posted some Vietnam War material on this, but of course many poor white violent types don't like this. Jews use them to promote blacks against whites and white groups vs other white groups..
      Another set of opponents to Miles think he's soft on Jewish atrocities. For example, he thinks the Dresden bombing was misrepresented and faked. I'm inclined to think it distracted from Eisenhower's Rhine murders. It is possible that deaths under Jews have been over-reported by truthers who want to report the fake 'Holocaust'. And estimating deaths is a difficult topic; should people who died young be counted extra, to allow for their not having children? Should people forced into impoverishment be included? Jews include Jews living after the fake 'Holocaust' if they can make money from them; should WW1 and WW2 whites allow for dead parents' missing grandchildren?
      A good example of a vague Jewish policy is their attitude to competition. They want monopolies for themselves, without allowing competition for others. Where they don't have representation, they want votes, 'democracy', free travel. But when they have power, they want to cut it off for others. When there is peace, they want to introduce subdivisions and rivalries and funded thugs and agitators. A Jewish trick is to watch for some reaction, then take it over; for example, 'socialism' started along with technology, the idea being to somehow share the benefits of better technology. But Jews make strenuous efforts to bend such things in what they think is their interest. Marxism is a good example of Jew-bent socialism. Miles I think is aware of all this.
      There are many Jewish issues waiting in the wings. Mathis never I think refers to the Talmud and its wily cautious hatreds, designed for inflammatory explosions under the right conditions. Or the oddity of linked beliefs which say members are chosen by God, but carefully keep their belief hidden. But, of course, hardly anyone else does. It is something like a series of algorithms, a sort of rule-book, which seem to have a lifelong impact on simple Jews. It's important because of the uncertainty it leaves as to how compelling it's supposed to be. We currently have a situation where some Jews have a tight control over money, conditionally upon people not understanding this. They might do well to keep the situation static. But Talmudic influences seem to have tipped their genetics to constantly doing more of the same. Europeans wondering about replacement may take seriously claims by Jews that very low-IQ immigrants are needed for work and effort. The truth probably is that Jews deeply hate whites, so that even if levels of competence drop to nothing Jews powerfully support their destruction. Miles seems aware of this possibility. I don't think he fully grasps it, though. Jewish central banks, for real or manufactured nations, print so much money that considerations of profit hardly matter to them. Yet Miles considers that gun control propaganda is intended to raise profits for gun makers. Or is this for their collaborators? I don't think he's sorted these ideas out. But then again nobody else has.
      Revision of the past is part of Mathisian work, extending back to the Medes and Persians and before. I suspect however the influence of people like Josh G. For example, on the William of Orange invasion and Cromwell, and the Great Fire of London, Miles' publications soft pedal war atrocities in England and impoverishment of English people by the Jewish debt bank system. Similarly, I noticed a piece by Josh G (not necessarily the same one) on Jews in China, an issue to which many people, including me, have been slow to notice. Does Josh G include mass murders by Jew-connected armies? Does Josh G discuss money from the USA given to Jew-run Chinese, in the way USA money was given to Jews in Russia? Well, not really.
      I must mention biology and medicine and Miles. He mentions 'antioxidants' somewhere. As far as I know, vitamin C is a molecule which can equally accept oxygen or give it up, so it circulated wound picking up oxygen from blood around the lungs, and giving it up in remote parts of the body, then continuing for more. He talks of partial poisoning by cadmium, I think from red pigment in the outside of Le Creuset cookware. He's never discussed salt in food, and the Jew-related campaign against it, no doubt to harm whites. But maybe this is just detail; he's been right all along about the coronavirus/ COVID/ 'vaccine' fraud. I've wondered why he seems not to have compared the fraudulent 'hiv/AIDS' 'pandemic' with COVID, but 1984 is nearly 40 years ago now, when Miles would be about 12. Watching a 'documentary' with 'noddy shot' morons about Freddie Mercury, I wondered if Brian May is a Jew, going along with NASA frauds, and Jews pushing fraudulent medicine, and getting lotsa publicity.
      I can't recall that he's discussed race, and the obviously phoney pretence of Jews to support blacks; many examples, from NAACP and BLM to examples from the black slave trade to South Africa and secret USA wars in Africa, show this. But perhaps he hardly needs to. The only reference to Coudenhove and Kalergi is in rich.pdf by 'Chachi Bayou' in I think Sept 2020; which may prove something.

Anyroad (to quote John Lennon) I maintain that Miles Mathis is a great thinker and innovator. In my view, he needs a dose of publicity awareness too. And more debate.
-- RW 30 Nov 2021

---

Below I list various screenshots and emails related to all this. I haven't bothered to sort by date. This simulates the way some online arguments develop. I want to show how I consider Miles Mathis to be a very serious truthseeker, but at the same time I may be a bit wrong.

Email to cuttingthroughthefog.com which is unposted. October 26, 2021 at 1:28 pm –
I looked at my logfiles and was surprised to find about 36 from cuttingthroughthefog, which I’d thought is moribund, judging (I fear) by the average level of comment. They were from Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada etc, though about half from the USA. They all pointed to my piece on Miles Mathis.

May I just make a few points. As far as I’m concerned, I never ‘fell out’ with Miles. It’s just that he never emails etc with me. The email quoted about flying fucks was something I recently found; I don’t think I’ve seen it before. That search engine on my site was set up with freefind, a completely standard bit of software which anyone can use, though like most software the techies behind it don’t make it easy. I think I copied the idea from David Irving. I even offered it to Miles, to add to his site; given the password, he could have had it on his site for years. However, he doesn’t talk to me.

I also would have liked a long discussion online with him. I have quite a high opinion of my chats, and their download numbers are quite high, though less that they were on Youtube from which I was of course banned by Wojshit. For example Lords of the Nukes. Many online talks of course are of dismal quality..

Hexzane527 is (as far as I know; I’ve never had any contact, which anyway might be risky for him in France) the best writer on WW2 as a possible mutual joint arrangement by Jews to kill off others. A good hypothesis which I did my own version of (https://big-lies.org/how-master-race-won-ww2/index.html) where ‘master race’ is not the Nazzies. I collected together his PDFs and assembled them with titles and an index on my site; partly because they’re very hard to find, even if you know they’re there, and partly in case they vanish. Come to think of it, I did much the same with Miles’s PDFs after they disappeared once, what now seems a long time ago. I don’t know if Miles has even noticed. He doesn’t talk to me.

Anyway, I’ll leave but let me just express surprise that such a fertile writer as Miles should have so few intelligent comments. Oh – I just noticed one veru good comment, on COVID as an ‘opportunity’!

RW