Nicholas Ennos: Jane Austen - a New Revelation. Book Reviewed by Rerevisionist.

Most Reviews | Big Lies site

Nicholas Ennos (I presume) with his book Jane Austen - a new revelation

Nicholas Ennos: Jane Austen - a new revelation (2013)

I first heard about this book in a comment to a 'Youtube' video, which was online; Youtube is a more or less obsolete site, run by unintelligent Jews. Nicholas' comment was made to a talk by Burford on the Shakespeare authorship problem which I'd recorded and put online in Youtube, illustrated by a photo taken within Hedingham Castle.

Smallish format (6" x 9") hardback, approaching 400 pages. Published in 2013, not 2014, by what appears to be a now-dissolved Manchester company. Formidable bibliography. The title on the jacket (including some lower-case lettering) is hard to discern from the cover painting; possibly intentionally - the hardback itself has clear gold lettering on red. The computer typesetting allows free use of italics, and bold characters - useful in examining dedications and epitaphs, though the indexing style for my taste is subtly wrong, indenting the wrong way round. In fact, not inappropriately, the name 'de Feullide, Eliza' is somewhat hidden.

Nicholas Ennos studied modern languages (and allows himself a scathing paragraph on the absurdly low standard of language teaching in Britain - I hope he's wrong, but fear he's right). He has competence in Latin (a chapter compares Tacitus's style with, for example, Goldsmith's History of England, pilloried by the real Austen).
On the subject of languages, it's as well to be reminded of some etymologies and origins. 'Fortunate', for example, obviously is related to 'fortunes' in the personal sense. Judging by Warren Hastings' activities, 'godfather' suggests a Biblical interpretation. The 'fishing fleet' of white women in India leaves a flavour of vanished sailing ships. Elizabeth took some lessons from an Accomptant.

The book is arranged, in my view very well, in bite-size chapters, somewhat independent of each other; perhaps he wrote his book in folders of topics. Where there is repetition, it's because of this structure.

The single longest chapter is 4 The Life of Eliza Hancock, which includes a marriage to a French "comte", who, though wealthy, was not all that wealthy, and seemed to have his eye on her money, with which to improve a beautiful but remote and boggy part of France. Mr Hancock may have been infertile; Warren Hastings being suggested, with evidence, as the father. Ennos has difficulties with Hastings' character, not surprisingly, of course. My personal best guess is that Jews profited from the opium 'trade', and offloaded as much as possible of the opprobrium onto British officials, including of course Hastings. Ennos (qualified as a solicitor) has a good eye for trustees, marriage laws, baronetcies as a royal money-maker, tax evasion by Warren Hastings, wills. Unfortunately Eliza herself is not illustrated (for portrait copyright reasons), but represented only by her grave slab (St John at Hampstead, though 'Wikipedia' doesn't list her as someone of interest).

Update: 25 Feb 2021

Ennos' book was published by Senesino Books, Sackville Street, Manchester, a company apparently dissolved in 2016. (The name Senesino must refer to Ennos' musical interest). Internet views of Speedyhen (book distributors, including his brothers' books), Quora, and a firm of solicitors weren't helpful. I fear his book may have sunk, though I hope not. May I point out that print-on-demand has been established for years, and so has the e-book technology. So a cheap paperback, and even cheaper e-books, are very feasible! Come on, Nick—you can't be that interested in conveyancing &cc! Think of schoolkids and the future. Though you may need a warning paragraph, to the effect that elderly teachers can love their mistakes, and may need to be handled carefully.

Allow me to mention a few cautionary remarks on the oeuvre of Eliza. He early works may include titles attributed to Fanny Burney, Camilla and Evalina. her later works may include Elizabeth Hamilton's Translations of the Letters of a Hindoo Rajah, in the style of Persian Letters. And Elizabeth Hamilton's Memoirs of Modern Philosophers. Ennos considers (from its non-Scottish story) that Ivanhoe may be Eliza's.

But Walter Scott, on the French Revolution, considers that Jews played a large part. As far as I know, there is nothing of this in Eliza. It's possible that Hastings may have been crypto-Jewish. The post-Napoleonic war events, with the Rothschild money-making scheme, so far as I know, is also missing from Eliza. Her involvement seems to have been relief—that her French husband liberated her, by being guillotined.
Warren Hastings never seems to have recognised her link to him; though at least he gave her a fortune. Ennos thinks Hastings was wary of establishing an inherited connection.
Eliza Hancock/de Feuillide: Calcutta 1761-1813 London R I P. Perhaps she could have devoted more time to the primitive writings of so-called 'Semites'. To this day, the northern Europe/Greek/Latin nexus remains separated from the primitively simple, but also semantically parasitical, eastern influence.

3 Feb 2021: Note on another view of Jane Austen on Miles Mathis' website:

Jane Austen: Social Engineer? By Anon, Nov 23, 2020. That pdf document doesn't attack the authorship issue, but looks at the books as carrying the message that rich and influential men are nice guys, not unpleasant men carrying out disgusting but profitable deeds.

Specimen: Pride and Prejudice has taught many generations of impressionable young women not only that the man representing Christianity the most is an idiot, but also that they should marry a man who, for all intents and purposes, might as well be a mythical creature to them, and to disdain other bachelors, i.e., everyone.

9 Nov 2021: Shelley and others suggested to me by Mathis' interest in Harriet Westbrook Shelley. And sundry deaths; and the Godwins. There seem to be analogous events surrounding Shelley, or perhaps surrounding Godwin. Godwin was famous for his supposedly startling views on property; Russell during WW1 was compared with Godwin. But Godwin (it seems) forced money or future money from Shelley. Probably Godwin was part of the Jewish/ Francmaçon aspects of the 'French' Revolution. Authorship issues over Frankenstein, a sort of 'penny dreadful' of the time, status issues, inheritance issues, and drowned bodies not (my view) identified reliably ... have a similar feel about them.
Official histories of culture usually ignore the common stuff of the time—supposed saints and relics, broadsheets of sensational deaths, folk song where known, horror and romance stories, schoolboy stuff ('George Orwell' discussed these), military atrocity stories usually unpublished. Included in this, must be ideals: it seems clear that the 'French Revolution' contemporaries were plagued by accounts, after all part of Christian stories, of equality, fairness, and horrors accompanying unfairnesses, whi produced multiple effects and hypocrisies.
The atmosphere of free movement between countries (Frankenstein is set in what are now England, Ireland, Italy, France, Scotland, Switzerland, Russia, Germany) and renting great houses in 'Austen', plus the great importance of inheritance and the corresponding trickery around legitimacy and wills, are easy to forget—the transitional period around 1900 when 'death duties' were introduced to impoverish old families and shift towards Jewish control represent a crux.
I'd guess legal processes on such matters were—or weren't—tightened up in the 19th century as a result. - RW

The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what Fiction means. [Miss Prism in The Importance of Being Earnest] - RW

The two best parts for most readers I'd guess are (1) the family connections surrounding Jane Austen (clergyman father skilled in Greek/Latin, but impoverished, Philadelphia Austen and the 'fishing fleet' in India, Henry Austen (brother) the failed banker who married Eliza ... morphing into Warren Hastings and matters in India And (2) literary matters: letters, authoresses, incidents from real life (or not), pseudonyms, names which become or are made famous. The sections on destruction of letters, largely by Cassandra, remind me of the destruction of Alfred Russel Wallace's letters to Darwin. Nicholas Ennos has in effect three introductions, the third outlining his reasons for investigating Jane Austen (italicised; the genuine author).

Musing over some online writings by Miles W Mathis, on New York hotels and landowners and the aristocracies of England and Scotland as transposed into the Americas, it occurred to me that without Eliza's bastardy, her literary works would not have existed; and we would have as little idea of the realities of the lives of such people as American 'Janeites' do now.

My guess is that Ennos will become as well-known as Thomas Looney, of de Vere fame. But path-breaking is difficult. Ennos has an 'Apology', a translation, I presume his, from Gottfried von Straßburg, saying he liked other works, which were well-written, attractive, sincere—but untrue. I wonder if Ennos means it.

My only reservation, which perhaps would not interest many people, is the greater world: 1815 and the Rothschild money grab was bang in the middle of the Jane Austen novels, and might have been considered important. Warren Hastings (and Islam) and the French Revolution (and Walter Scott?) could do with a shot of revisionism. So can the past: the 18th century as post-(((Bank Of England))) takeover, spawning Mills and Boon tales.
RW 30 Dec 2017

The idea that Jane Austen may have been poisoned with arsenic surfaced in 2011 (or was popularised then). Ennos's book does not consider the idea. However, he has an online comment posted after his book was published:–

Jane Austen's cousin, and sister in law, Eliza de Feuilide, was the author of the novels and not Jane, as I prove in my book "Jane Austen - a New Revelation".

The medical evidence tends to show that Jane Austen was killed by arsenic poisoning which must have been administered by members of her family. Her blotchy skin was consistent with arsenic poisoning and a lock of her hair was tested by its owners in the last century and found to contain arsenic. This was consistent with the Austen family cover up of Eliza's authorship of the novels. A letter of Jane Austen's dated 29 January 1813 proves that all of the novels had been written by this date, as it gives the prices to be charged for each and confirms that they had been completed. Eliza died in April 1813. The letter of January 1813 shows that there were three completed novels that remained to be published: Mansfield Park, Emma and Persuasion. In addition, in 1815 or 1816 Henry Austen bought back the copyright of Northanger Abbey from the publishers. Jane Austen travelled to London and together with Henry Austen organised the publication of these last four novels from 1813 to 1817. By 1817 it was no longer necessary for Jane Austen to be kept alive and her existence might prove an embarrassment for people investigating the authorship of the novels.

The person who probably administered the arsenic would have been Cassandra Austen, her sister, who lived with her. Cassandra falsified a chronology of when each of the novels was written, showing that the last few were written after Eliza's death. As I have mentioned, Jane Austen's letter of 29 January 1813 shows that this chronology was false and therefore Cassandra was intimately involved in the cover up of Eliza's authorship. Cassandra also destroyed 90 per cent of Jane Austen's letters to expunge any evidence of Eliza's authorship. However, she was not clever enough to destroy the letter of 29 January 1813 which is the "smoking gun" which proves Eliza's authorship of the novels.

There's a certain horrifying fascination in reading comments by women on Jane Austen. I wonder if whites are genetically inclined to live in, or at least imagine they are in, fantasies and dreamworlds. Perhaps it's something to do with long dark nights in northern Europe: hobbies, obsessions, indoor activities, repetitions, survival necessities for some, escapism for others. I couldn't find a single Internet comment from a woman interested in Nicholas Ennos's book. They all seemed to like, or say they liked, the breathy nothingness of Lucy Worsley and the (((British))) Broadcasting Corpse. The ones who weren't impressed disliked Worsley, not her weak presentation.

Nicholas Ennos 31 Dec 2017
It is interesting that you mention Jews and the French Revolution. In my book I mention Eliza Hamilton being another of the noms de plume of Eliza de Feuillide. In Hamilton's books she is extremely anti Jacobin. The Jacobins were basically illuminated Freemasonry who were behind the French Revolution. They were ultimately controlled by the Rothschilds. Eliza de Feuillide was married to a French nobleman executed in the French Revolution. She also had aristocratic friends in France. As such it seems she belonged to a different wing of Freemasonry. It is likely that she belonged to the Mopsorden, or Order of the Pug, a quasi Masonic order open to women and Catholics. Women belonging to the order owned pug dogs, as Eliza did. Parts of Jane Austen novels contain hidden references to Freemasonry. Her father Warren Hastings started the sale of opium to China, a trade in which the Jews were to be heavily involved. However, he was strongly against slavery, another trade dominated by Jews.
One thing I did not mention in my book as it is purely speculative, is Eliza de Feuillide's possible authorship of some of the Walter Scott novels, in particular Ivanhoe. Eliza was deeply interested in history and it would have been strange if she had not attempted to write historical novels. The author of Ivanhoe seems to be English, as it deals with the conflict between Saxons and Normans, which never happened in Scotland. From the accurate portrayal of the female characters and the style of writing the author also appears to be a woman. The introduction to Ivanhoe also states that the writer is using a pseudonym and is more famous for novels in other genres. In Ivanhoe one of the heroes is a Jew and his daughter Rowena. So it seems that Eliza was deceived about Jews and did not make the connection between them and the Jacobins.

Rerevisionist
Terrific. Thanks. My Scott mention was really to his history of the Fr Rev, which is I think available now on Internet - of course he preceded Nesta Webster. But it hadn't occurred to be Scott might have been ghosted, if that's the right word for the connection. Interesting.
.... Do you think Eliza felt it a step down to marry into the Austens? Just curious.
.... Just curious if you are/were Hungarian - not many books have a prefatory Hungarian poem.

Nicholas Ennos
Thank you for your kind review. I had expected to sell more copies of my book but I look on it as an ongoing project. I have a lot of other things going on in my life as well. I think I was very surprised just how much even educated people are trapped in the matrix and are terrified that things are not what they seem, it seems to threaten their whole reason for living. I am afraid I did not understand what you meant about putting comments on Amazon but would be happy for you to do this.
I have reviewed biographies of Jane Austen on Amazon. The latest one was dreadful as in addition to the content Lucy Worsley does not know how to write, she just writes as if she is talking. I am very old fashioned as I was educated at a top grammar school in the 1970s and so I can see how woefully low education standards are now.
I am a great Hungarophile as I love Budapest and the Hungarian language which I am trying to learn.
One thing I discovered which might interest you is that I renovated a flat there and my builder was a Serb from Novi Sad. When he spoke English his accent was identical to that of Elie Wiesel who claimed to be a Hungarian-speaking Romanian. The Hungarians speak with a totally different accent. I also found on the internet an entry card of Wiesel's into France (with his photo but no name) from the Yugoslav embassy. So he was just a complete fraud and took the identity of someone else but he got the Nobel Prize and his book Night was heavily promoted by the Holohoax industry.
Eliza was the cousin of Henry Austen and 10 years older and she had flirted with him when she was younger. She had hoped to find a richer husband but she sort of forced him to become a banker which in the end led to him becoming bankrupt.

Top of Page