Home page of big-lies.org, Raeto West's website

  Block of 800+ Reviews   |   Reviews by Subject:   Audio-visual Media | Health, Medical | Jews (Frauds Freemasons Religions Wars) | Race | Revisionism | Women
  Reviews of Authors:   H Belloc | P Bustion | C Caskie | N Chomsky | R Dawkins | M Gardner | D Irving | K MacDonald | M Mathis | B Russell | H G Wells
 
revisionism.org finds this page, which is   big-lies.org/reviews/reviews-revisionism.html

'Revisionism' in many subjects.

Intensive propaganda and near-complete suppression are typical.

My entire site deals with these issues. Many aren't even recognised as 'controversial' by most people. I've linked to some articles and some reviews, to give general overviews. I've done my best to describe them, but this is difficult with unfamiliar subjects.

v. 28 February 2021, 11 June 2021, 27 Oct 2021, 5 June 2023, 31 March 2024


  NOTES ON EMERGING REVISIONISMS.   Many are largely unknown to most people. There are few recognised books, since of course they'd be censored. We have to guess on future work:–

VERY IMPORTANT: Jewish networks that start wars for profit. With non-Jew dupes and collaborators. Learn about the World Wars.
How Jews won WW1 and WW2  |  Hexzane527 gives questions from France on WW1, WW2 and WW3  |  Holocaust Revisionism which is just another world-wide Jewish fraud. (Gipsies judging by Jewish numerology—15 to 1 in the frauds of 6 million Jews and 400,000 gipsies—have been overlooked as junior versions of Jews.)

VERY IMPORTANT: Jews and Control of Money.
Chronology of Jews with general history where it's known. Includes the Federal Reserve as a most important example of junk value.

VERY IMPORTANT: Jews and Control of 'News' and 'History'.
This is hugely important; almost everything ordinary people think they know is, at present, put there by Jews. Watch 'general knowledge' quiz shows for lightweight examples.   I'll insert one serious example here of faux revisionism: a painfully long article assembled by Unz from Jewish-approved sources, dealing with the Second World War. Many threads are supplied by assorted Jews. In this case, the most important idea to be avoided is the idea that Hitler and other Jews in Germany communicated with other Jews world-wide. The next thread to be avoided is any mention of Jews involved in atrocities.

VERY IMPORTANT: Jews and Religions.
Jews in history have spread religions as profit sources. Christianity and Islam as the most important and successful. Shows how non-Jews are co-opted to make money and conquests. Religions as Jewish-funded self-supporting nonsense. Includes how 'Jews' use gullibility of target populations, and violence of the sort familiar from present-day Jewish-funded thugs. And using bishops, vicars, preachers as supporters for economic career reasons. But they have been largely displaced by technical advances in broadcasting and even clothing.

VERY IMPORTANT IN THE LONG RUN: Understanding Jewish Psychology and Methods of Approach.
      Jewish evolution as parasites: Jewish history including the Mediterranean, the scattered sea-travel based empire, with interpenetration with allies, and parasitism, and pretence of expertise. All this must become widely understood by most people if there's to be much of a future.
      Long-term propaganda campaigns. These are just 20th century book publishing in Britain. (Not radio, not film, not TV, not 'news'
      An important example of activity by Jews and their hirelings is race-mixing which is encouraged by Jews, generally for whites. The link is to a review of a typically third-rate book. Here's another site on Jews pushing immigration with names of organisations, in this case into the UK.
      Jewish control of money, using paper and junk generally to gain control of gold and legally-held assets, shows Jewish control at its most subversive and shocking, though it is hidden compared with Jewish massacres and wars. Try my piece on teaching about Jews but be warned this is one of the most censored of subjects.

VERY IMPORTANT INTELLECTUALLY IN THE LONG RUN: Let's examine Science frauds and Societal frauds.
      Scientific Frauds in my experience are often the outcome of incompetent Jews or their hirelings, such as Freemasons, happy to make money indefinitely from frauds. The psychology is similar to desperate Third-Worlders who use forged documents to pose as lawyers, doctors, engineers, accountants. Examples include NASA, 'nuclear weapons' and 'nuclear power', supposed diseases such as AIDS and SARS and deadly coronavirus, and entire subjects where the basis is flawed, such as cell biology and immunology and cancer research. These shade into subjects such as race research and inheritance.
      Societal Frauds are Jews' leading expertise: with control of all media, and feedback from interviews and questionnaires from their victims, they are sure that most people know little about anything of importance. Probably the Bible was simply selected by 'Jews' from other cultures. The most devastating are empirical, not theoretical—9/11, middle east wars, enormous waste to add to interest repayments to Jews, staged faked events. Examples include climate, archaeology, race, lies about wars, disease, and statistics. The question of salt in human diet which led to plummeting death rates from diseases, and of the failed 'look-say' method to prevent children learning to read, are other examples. It is quite likely that a Jewish world-state will be hopelessly incompetent, with propagandised simpleton victims of ugly loud-mouthed fools and very secret manipulative gray eminences who think insanely that they are chosen by God.


BELOW are a few of very many reviews and comments on many topics. They vary in detail and with my knowledge at the time and assessment of their importance.

Here's an index to them, sorted roughly by topics.
Click on links, which are underlined in the usual convention; or just scroll down.

ANCIENT WORLD
Peter James: Centuries of Darkness  |  Peter James: Atlantis Solved  | 
MIDDLE AGES and the WORLD SINCE ABOUT 1500
Brackman: Darwin & A R Wallace  |  Carlyle: French Revolution  |  Hobsbawm: Revolution 1789-1848  |  Hobsbawm: Age of Extremes 1914-1991  | 
1914- SPECIFICALLY WORLD WARS & HOLOHOAX
Wise: Hitler Greatest Story NEVER told video  |  Irving: War Between the Generals  |  Gerard Menuhin: Truth .. or .. Devil  |  A. R. Butz: Hoax of the 20th Century  |  Bradley Smith: Holocaust Revisionist  |  Buchanan: Churchill, Hitler, Unnecessary War  |  WW2 in Cinema, Film, TV Propaganda
JEWS AND THEIR ENEMIES IN HISTORY
Bjerknes's book Beware the World to Come  |  Hilaire Belloc on The Jews (1920...)  |  H G Wells and the Jewish Question  |  Frank Britton on post-1945 Jewish world  |  Irving: Uprising! Hungary 1956  |  1991: Lady Jane Birdwood on Anti-Gentilism (Christian viewpoint)
BRITISH HISTORY
Margaret Cole: Life of G D H Cole  |  Tom Reilly: Cromwell  |  Levellers and Gerrard Winstanley  |  Robert Reid: Luddite Revolt 1812  |  Nicholas Ennos: Jane Austen  |  George Dangerfield: Strange Death of Liberal England  |  Suffragettes and Jewish Violence  |  Arthur Henry Lane: Alien Menace  |  Humphrey Berkeley: National Government, UK 1931  |  1945-1975: Jews and Crime in UK  |  C N Parkinson: Left Luggage  |  F J Irsigler: Who Makes Our Money?  |  W A P Manser: Britain in Balance  |  John Bean: Blood in the Square  | 
CULTURAL
Allen: Buddha and India's Lost Religion  |  Frances Wood: Did Marco Polo Go to China?  |  Looney: Shakespeare Identified  |  Ogburn: William Shakespeare  |  Jillian Robertson: Captain Cook  |  Hensman: Rich Against Poor (1971)  |  Metapedia  |  Ian Cobain: Cruel Britannia  | 


image   Review of revisionist ancient history   Peter James: Centuries of Darkness

Thoughtful revisionist overview of the near east ancient world, June 26, 2010

I saw this book reviewed in History Today and the Fortean Times in, ooh, 1997? And met Peter James by chance. He told me in effect—I think this is right—that his work was the seed which David Rohl grew and made his own, at least as regards the Biblical material. The basic thesis here is that Egyptian inscriptions are the only really solid basis for middle east chronology—they go back thousands of years. The principle is rather like British Parliamentary documents, which are all dated as year such and such in the nth year of the reign of such and such a monarch. However, if there's an error in the chronology, by the familiar processes it becomes institutionalised, and as hard to remove as Japanese knotweed. James and his colleagues extend in many directions—Greek and Roman views on dating, dendrochronology and carbon dating, the Trojan War, Schliemann, Babylonian artefacts, Newton, Ur, Knossos, Marathon, Solomon, the discovery of the Hittites from an incredibly tiny smattering of clues; there are attractive monochrome plates, and many line drawings, taken from earlier books. The introduction by Colin Renfrew, 1990, provides its own internal dating statement. I haven't attempted to follow up the impact this book had, or very likely, hadn't. Peter James told me the first printing didn't sell out, and I'm unaware if there was ever a paperback edition.

Top of Page
image   Review of revisionism of ancient history   Peter James: The Sunken Kingdom—the Atlantis Mystery Solved

Catastrophes aren't liked by timid scholars, June 26, 2010

Much of this book is based on Plato's Timaeus and another part of Plato's work. 'Timaeus' was very popular in medieval times—more than most of Plato—and this fact was explained condescendingly by labelling medieval people as very silly. In fact it's a long account in 'catastrophist' mode, and makes perfect sense. PJ's solution is a kingdom or town now in Turkey, where some of the sites are huge mounds. The Atlantis legend had a long history, largely I suppose oral, and it's pleasing to find a claim to have pinned down the original disaster and its retellings and distortions. I give three stars on the principle of averaging—I'm not sure he's right.

Top of Page
Thomas Carlyle   Review of Thomas Carlyle (1795–1881)   The French Revolution

Consider Carlyle's Limitations—Understand the Modern World.   Feb 15, 2016

French Revolution by Thomas Carlyle. First published in 1837. Or so the official story goes; at the time many books were published in parts, in magazines, before risking the costs of full typesetting. And he wrote Heroes and Hero-Worship which (according to Wikisource...) was penetrating and picturesque, including Mahomet, Dante, Shakespeare, Luther, Knox, Johnson, Rousseau, Burns, Cromwell and Napoleon. But no Jews. This book and his others perhaps led to Samuel Smiles, interested more in the less subtle subject of success in money-making through work. His books led him to be considered an ancestor of fascism, for example by Bertrand Russell. And an ancestor of Nietzsche. Note the pattern of Jew-avoidance.
      Carlyle's background—something from German philosophy, which then was novel, and no doubt had covert Jewish elements; something from Scotch dialect—was unusual. Carlyle (1795 – 1881) was born after the start of the 'French Revolution', now known to have been a Jewish event. He survived aged about 40 to about 86—more than half his life—under Queen Victoria's reign. He died in the same year as Disraeli. I can't imagine he came near to understanding Jewish machinations, except as an accessory: he wrote Oliver Cromwell's Letters and Speeches - with Elucidations (1848. Three volumes in one, 1888 published by Chapman and Hall;I have tattered copy of this).

Dutch Republic dissolved: 1795 tom paine died 1809 sack of peking 1900 US civil war 1861 - 1865 1859 tale of 2 cities tumbril etc carlyle and brunel and 1844 rain steam speed 30,000 needlewomen G.BRADSHAW'S.RAILWAY.GUIDES first published 1839 Sir Arthur Thomas Quiller-Couch
(1863 – 1944) Cornish carlyle failure to identify novelty: napoleonic france huge bureaucracy perhaps. organisation? mediocre officials? mediocre hierarchies of careerists?
(1837) FREDERICK THE SECOND AND HIS TIMES BRITISH MUSEUM AND THE STATE-PAPER OFFICE, Raumer, Baron von
(1755*): GENERAL NATURAL HISTORY & THEORY OF THE HEAVENS NEWTONIAN PRINCIPLES, Kant
(1756*): ESSAI SUR LES MOEURS, Voltaire
(1756*): HISTORY, Hume, David
(2nd part)
(1759*): THE HISTORY OF RASSELAS PRINCE OF ABYSSINIA, Johnson, Samuel
(1759 published 1760-1767*): THE LIFE AND OPINIONS OF TRISTRAM SHANDY, Sterne, Lawrence
(9 vols)
(1759): THE THEORY OF MORAL SENTIMENTS, Smith, Adam
(1762): ÀMILE, Rousseau, J -J
(1799): GOETZ VON BERLICHINGEN, Goethe, Trans Scott, Walter
(1806): ORIGINAL MEMOIRS GREAT CIVIL WAR, Slingsby & Hodgson, Scott, Walter
(1808): LIFE OF DRYDEN, Scott, Walter
(1808): MARMION, Scott, Walter 30 more titles by Scott inc multi-vols
(1827): THE LIFE OF NAPOLEON BUONAPARTE, Scott, Walter
(in Encyc Britannica)
(1849*): HISTORY OF ENGLAND, Macaulay, Thomas Babington (Vols 1 & 2)
(1824, 33 US edns till 1890): ELÀ( ÀMENTS DE GÀ( ÀOMÀ( ÀTRIE, Legendre, Eng trans by the same Thomas Carlyle (presumably as Elements of Geometry)
(1837): THE FRENCH REVOLUTION, Carlyle (in Adams)
(1839): CHARTISM, Carlyle, Thomas
(1839*): CRITICAL AND MISCELLANEOUS ESSAYS, Carlyle, Thomas (7 vols)
(1841): ON HEROES, HERO-WORSHIP AND THE HEROIC IN HISTORY, Carlyle
(1843*): PAST AND PRESENT, Carlyle
(1845): OLIVER CROMWELL'S LETTERS AND SPEECHES, Carlyle
(1853*): SARTOR RESARTUS-HEROES AND HERO WORSHIP & PAST AND PRESENT, Carlyle
(1858-65): HISTORY OF FREDERICK THE GREAT, Carlyle, Thomas (in Adams superlative genius)
(1833): DELL'UNITÀ! À ITALIANA, Mazzini, Guiseppe
(1850*): LIVES OF THE PAINTERS, Vasari, First English translation
(1850): MEMOIRS OF BENVENUTO CELLINI, Cellini Trans Roscoe, Thomas (in Adams)
(1851-1852*): UNCLE TOM'S CABIN, Stowe, Harriet Beecher
(1852*): A SPORTSMAN'S NOTEBOOK, Turgenev, Ivan
(1852*): BENONI, Munby, A J
(1852-1853): BLEAK HOUSE, Dickens
(1852-5): EDINBURGH REVIEW, edited by Lewis, Sir George Cornewell
(1852): Evergreen Game by Anderssen
(1852*): EXTRAORDINARY POPULAR DELUSIONS & MADNESS OF CROWDS, Mackay, Charles
(1852 Eng trans): HISTORY OF THE CRUSADES, Michaud, J F (in Adams most important history of the Crusades)
(1852): LADY OF SHALOTT, Tennyson
(1852*): MASK AND FACES, Reade, Charles (play)
(1852): NAPOLÀ( ÀON LE PETIT, Hugo, Victor (Tiny hardback in bookshop)
(1852): SUCCESS IN LIFE, Anon (in Briggs)
(1852, republished 1863, trans 1878): THE COSSACKS, Tolstoy, Leo
(1852*?): THE EIGHTEENTH BRUMAIRE OF LOUIS BONAPARTE, Marx, K
(1852): THE HISTORY OF HENRY ESMOND, Thackeray
(1852): THESAURUS=CLASSED CATALOGUE OF WORDS, Roget, Peter Mark
(1851-53): A CHILD'S HISTORY OF ENGLAND, Dickens, C


Top of Page
E Hobsbawm Age Revolution
Be Jew Aware!
  Review of   Eric Hobsbawm   The Age of Revolution 1789-1848 [Uploaded 2014-08-01]


Part of the standard view of European history promoted in particular since 1945. Hobsbawm was part of a rather inbred world, one of many Jewish immigrants into Britain before 1945, doing no doubt a routine PhD in Cambridge. He had tenure at Birkbeck College and of course became part of the post-1945 era when Britain had been impoverished by the war. His book was standard university fare; I have a copy which was bought in a University Union Bookshop in the 1960s. Several generations were routinely exposed to this material by their teachers. The cover design shown is an Open University set book.

I'll review this in the way it was written: as a Jewish view, unconcerned with truth, but to promote what Hobsbawm's groupthink mind presumably considered Jewish interests. These are Jewish power, and of course money. His emphasis on power is irritating to the truth-seeker: most of science and technology is treated dismissively, Hobsbawm's attitude being like a shareholder, taking little interest in difficulties or practicalities, which are left to the employees. Doctors, including 'some in Germany', appear in lists, but in the employee sense. There is a massive bibliography, in which he is very careful (without saying so) to point to books by fellow Jews, and Soviet reference books, but otherwise shows little discernment. Nevertheless the bibliography almost manages to look more interesting than the book. There are many maps of a hard-edged sort. There are endnotes on each chapter, mostly references, perhaps to remind him who he copied.
      There's curious back-to-front reasoning (64): railways were important BECAUSE they were expensive. This was 'needed if the capital-goods industries were to be transformed' meaning presumably Jewish finance had an interest. His material on the French Revolution has no mention whatever that I recall of Rothschild financing of both sides, nor of the Rothschild financial coup in London just after Waterloo. In fact, the French Revolution is barely mentioned, (The American Revolution is all but unmentioned; its basis in trying to throw off the financial yoke based in Britain is not something Hobsbawm would wish to discuss).
      On Malthus (335) Hobsbawm deems him 'neither as original nor as compelling as its supporters claimed'. Hobsbawm doesn't think in terms of crowding or overpopulation or deaths, but financially– Malthus proved 'the poor must always remain poor'. Hobsbawm mentions (58) small men driven to be 'currency cranks' (the latter phrase is Jewish for anyone commenting on Jewish credit) and is the nearest he gets to a two-tier theory of money. It interested me to see Hobsbawm's pro-Freemasonry remarks when discussing Mozart. 'Ten million tons of coal' in 1800 puzzled me: what does Hobsbawm mean by this? Is it a lot? What are the implications? Naturally war deaths and injuries are pretty much ignored, and readers unaware of Jewish attitudes might regard this as objectivity. His nationalism chapter of course excludes 'Jewish' tribal racism.

The title is rather misleading: 'The Age of Revolution' and the dates 1789 and 1848 suggest the book is largely about revolutions, especially in those years. In fact there's little on either. The general feel and the contents suggest the book was never intended as a single, thought-through work: before the days of word-processors, the career writer would try to avoid the painful process or rewriting). Apologies for the tedium here: we find PART I: DEVELOPMENTS which are 1 THE WORLD IN THE 1780S/ 2 THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION/ 3 THE FRENCH REVOLUTION/ 4 WAR/ 5 PEACE/ 6 REVOLUTIONS/ 7 NATIONALISM an achronic list. Then PART II: RESULTS which are 8 LAND/ 9 TOWARDS AN INDUSTRIAL WORLD/ 10 THE CAREER OPEN TO TALENT/ 11 THE LABOURING POOR/ 12 IDEOLOGY: RELIGION/ 13 IDEOLOGY: SECULAR/ 14 THE ARTS/ 15 SCIENCE/ 16 CONCLUSION: TOWARDS 1848. The shoehorned descriptive non-analysis is discouraging.

Hobsbawm admires Marx, and is entirely subservient to Marxian Jews; the endnotes praise Marx's 'Capital' as 'almost contemporary'. Hobsbawm liked Hegel, who brought the advantage of allowing serious-sounding Germanic generalisations which look profound, though modified to be Jewish. This textbook must be viewed as a product designed to be put before students, rather than a serious work of history. Hobsbawm has a frown-inducing attitude of depending on (76-7) retrospective importance, in that case his estimate of the French revolution; rather like saying (e.g.) Marx was enormously important, so let's investigate his parents and grandparents. The more-or-less Marxist vocabulary is inescapable: 'bourgeois', 'implacable cash nexus', 'mature industrial economy', 'proletariat'.

Non-Jewish material clearly glazes over Hobsbawm's eyes. Subjects get their routinised dutiful sentences: Carlyle? Hapsburgs? Lancashire? 'Industrial revolution'? Music? Science? But there's a flicker of excitement where Jews are challenged: (343) Thierry brothers' idea that the French descended from the Gauls, and the aristocrats from Teutons, and Gobineau. As might be expected, ancient controversies depending partly on sheer lack of information aren't treated fairly: Sir William Lawrence's Natural History of Man 1819 (340) was part of the dispute as to whether natural growing things might be man-made. It's always interesting to see how sympathetic writers are to (e.g.) alchemy, or the very remote prehistory of mankind, or economics before much information existed.

Here's my video of Hobsbawm on the Jewish coup d'état in Russia. Oh, sorry. The 'Socialist Revolution'. And its history. I taped this about 16 years before his death:-
hosbawm-1996 Can We Write the History of the Russian Revolution?

Top of Page
Review Topic: How Jewish paper money bought the 'Labour Party', led it to wars, and won them for Jews.
Dame Margaret Cole:   The Life of G D H Cole.

Unnoticed Covert Purchase by Jews of Men and Women from about 1900.   Life of George Douglas Howard Cole 1889-1959.

The so-called 'Labour Party' in Britain started, roughly, in 1900. At that time, there was a Liberal Party and a Conservative Party. Industrialism established big factories, warehouses, railways and so on—no doubt encouraging the desire to own and control them, in a way much less likely in rural societies. Ordinary people wondered about control, and vague ideas about 'socialism' surfaced; traditional elites, more practical, reacted against these ideas. The South African wars allowed Jews to own gold mines and gold reserves. Propaganda techniques at the time were newspapers and teaching, and on a smaller scale colleges and universities. The Church of England survived from the Dutch invasion and installation of William of Orange. That event in effect was a 'great reset' of the time; after it, newborns were subjected to selected information, and unaware of what had happened to get there, notably civil wars.

Here's a thought experiment, a piece of social science fiction in fact: Jews had built up, in secret, a world-wide network, which included 'goy' secret groups, notably Freemasons. Just suppose they had been benign, wanting to spread amity and friendship; what might the world have become? My imagination is not able to visualise such a possibility. And serious evolutionary biologists, if any existed, might have shown why this couldn't happen.

Anyway, knowledge of Jews was non-existent or submerged; universities in Britain were unaware of the issue. If they had been, history, as they say, would have been changed. By 1913 the privately-owned 'Federal' 'Reserve' system allowed Jews to print unlimited paper money, and use their gold to buy out important assets. This must have been a most significant shift in power, perhaps the most important ever.
      “Where does Jewish money come from?” “There's no mystery about where Jews get their money: they print it, and the Federal Reserve is not audited in any way by non-Jews. Simple as that.” And “Nazis, Fascists, Stalinists, Maoists” were also funded by Jews.
      Side note: I listened for a time to the Political Cesspool on Internet, with James Edwards. They discussed what they imagine the old USA to have been, recounting all the fakery fed to US kids—Lincoln, freedom, new foundation without Europeans—entirely unaware that the system was controlled throughout by Jews. There were too many ads or my liking. Edwards has some connection with Kevin MacDonald, whose ventures into the world of Jews EXCLUDE the 'holocaust', 9/11, US war crimes, and the entire WW1 and WW2 complex.
      Side note: Miles Mathis wrote an account of the USA from the 1930s, with its sudden vast job market for making weapons, and the excitement of going to war, living in tents, supporting Stalin, and all the rest of it. How wonderful to be alive in 1945. (To my chagrin, I can't find his piece, which I found shocking).

Many people seem to think COVID (or, for the more advanced, the COVID fraud) shows a uniquely high level of propaganda and 'brainwashing'. In fact, Jews since 1900 have dominated people's thoughts, if they can be called that. Anti-German propaganda was so successful in Britain that it—and its Russian companion—has completely dominated people, and saturated radio and film and TV, so people as yet can't see its falsity.


G D H Cole 1889–1959; married Margaret Postgate 1893–1980. I haven't attempted to check Jewish affiliations.

Dame Margaret Cole's book was published in 1971 by Macmillan, who have a long record of publishing poor quality books: they published a book on the so-called 'Cuba Crisis' for example. I became mildly interested in Cole through related issues: schools, teaching; Oxford, the LSE (London School of Economics); the Webbs: Sidney the Jew, and Beatrice the heiress rich through government action; Harold Laski, the Jewish author of many Jewish-scheme books and Victor Gollancz, the Jewish publisher of propaganda; the Suffragettes and other pressure groups for the Great War; the New Statesman and the Fabians; William Morris, H G Wells, Bernard Shaw and his rich wife, and Bertrand Russell.
      Oxford University, and long-established British schools, run their threads through the 20th century: he went to St Paul's School and Balliol; and 'from 1912 to 1919 held a prize fellowship at Magdalen College'. Some amusing passages in the book describe how Cole went round trying to find other posts; this sort of thing is routinely censored from people of this sort, when they scrabble around for, usually, Jewish money. Margaret Cole was less educated: 'Assistant Secretary to the Labour Research Department from 1916-25—including the period of mass deaths of Britons—and 'Lecturer for tutorial classes ate London and Cambridge from 19235-1949.' She writes that her brother Richmond became the 'BBC Controller of educational programmes'. Cole was a conscientious objector during the Great War, suggesting to the cynic he was just another Jew, leaving deluded Britons to die. Cole was about 25 at the start of the 'Great War', and about 50 at the start of the Second World War.
      Cole was made Chichele Professor of Economic and Social History, at (I think) All Souls College in 1944. This professorship still exists. Perhaps some of these professors wrote useful things. But I doubt it. Cole is supposed to have influenced Harold Wilson, who more or less secretly wanted mass immigration into Britain. And influenced Hugh Gaitskell, suspected of being murdered.


Margaret Cole took no great interest in the realities of war, and the facts of payments by Jews, and the habits of Freemasons. The word 'Freemason' is used without comment somewhere, I recall. Somewhere she recalls a great triumph, trade unionists—or someone—preventing arms going against Stalin—not a very convincing story. I couldn't force myself to the end of this book, horrifying though it is as a record of the uses of paper money in forcing people to follow causes to their advantage, but not to others. Let's hope the 21st century is a new era of woken people. But it looks unlikely.

© Rae West   27 July 2021


Top of Page
E J Hobsbawm Age of extremes Review of   Eric J Hobsbawm   The Age of Extremes. The Short 20th Century 1914-1991 (First published 1994)
Quality of Content | 'Chutzpah' and Truth Denial
Review by Rerevisionist     16 Nov 2015
hideous Hobsbawm Published by Michael Joseph in 1991. Note that the 'fall' of the Jewish USSR is officially dated December 1991. Hobsbawm's paean to so-called 'jews' in the 20th century must have been pre-arranged. I don't know how many people are gullible enough to imagine the USSR's planned failure (with 'Jewish' 'oligarchs' getting away with fortunes) was unexpected; of course it wasn't. The mentally and physically hideous Hobsbawm must have been tipped off, and compiled this rubbish as part of the propaganda deluge fuelled by the 'Fed' and by 'Jewish' propaganda. Hobsbawm has an 'End of Socialism' chapter, which includes China in addition to the 'USSR'.
    (Added later: looking back, I put the wrong publication date. 1991 is too early—even the hacks would have noticed).

My edition is a hefty paperback; printed I think on thick paper to give the impression of substance. It has a bibliography of approaching 500 books; with further reading, 'for those who want to know more', of about 80 titles including for example Gabriel Kolko.

Hobsbawm is a perfect example of an academic promoted because he's 'Jewish'. He had a sort of flavour of Marx, camouflaging his 'Jewish' tribal race bias. 1991 must have been fed to him; 1914 of course marks the start of 'Jewish' wars aiming for the end of white rule.

Edward Said, in the London Review of Books: It is difficult to imagine that anyone other than Hobsbawm could have approached – much less achieved – the consistently high level of these volumes: taken together, they represent one of the summits of historical writing in the postwar period. (Said was a fairly typical third-world academic poseur).
On 'Jews', Hobsbawm writes of 'handful of dead of 1881' and '40 to 50 of Kishinev pogrom of 1903', given in a puzzled way as contrasted with later numbers of deaths of whites in Russia, for example. Slight contrast, is there not? Pogrom revisionism is a new field; see this link, for example.

The First World War 'broke out'. Possibilities of British neutrality or US non-intervention aren't considered, of course. Hobsbawm thinks the US Civil War had 'more casualties than all US 20th century wars' which I suppose is a grateful hat-tip to simple American allies. Others don't fare so luckily: there's nothing for example on the Bengal famine, the Boxer rebellion, Nigeria and Biafra. The inferior races are written out.

On the 'Great Depression', Hobsbawm treats this in the standard childish way, quoting 'Jewish' news sources. (Finance, and money, are unindexed). This leads up to the journalistic-style nothingness of: the dollar, 'keystone of the post-war world economy planned and guaranteed by the USA, grew weaker'. The 'rate of GNP growth in 1980s' given naively as a measure—as it is for 'Jews'.

On the 1920s and 1930s, Hobsbawm has heard of 'the march on Rome', and Fascism, though with no grasp of the arrangement of support. He quotes from the alleged historian Ian Kershaw, that Nazism is 'scarcely capable of rational analysis'—not true, of course, but for the 74-year old Hobsbawm a bit of an effort.

The USSR gets mentions: Lysenko is given some prominence. 'Killing, torture, mass exile... everyday experiences which we no longer notice' is a verdict.

Hobsbawm is of course grateful for the Jewish mongrel and war criminal: the 'universally loved and admired war leader, Winston Churchill'. He quotes the supposed six million total of 'Jews' in the 'Holocaust' fraud, but, maybe as a token to revisionism, says this is 'probably exaggerated'. The post-1945 'fall of Empires' is noted, but the takeovers by Jews and the US empire go unmentioned.

Then we have the chapter entitled 'The Golden Years'—from the 1950s—luckily coinciding with Hobsbawm's pseudo-career.

Connoisseurs of scientific revisionism will be amused that the chapter on Science was contributed by John Maddox, an undistinguished editor, includes AIDS, molecular biology, Nobel 'laureates', number of scientific papers as a measure, the ozone layer, wave/ particle dualism, all treated conventionally. We also have chaos theory, presented as though a complete body of knowledge. There's an electron micrograph of a bacterium 'spilling its DNA'. And a section on 'transport beyond the earth. The first moon landing', absurdly suggesting a routine. Naive stuff on opposition to fluoridation.
      Hobsbawm makes no distinction between science and technology; he talks of 'millions of scientists' and incidentally has little on what they do; especially arms and nuclear issues.

The arms industry is at least noticed though; there was 'little else' which a declining industrial state like the UK could sell competitively. Though the GNP is highest ever. A few more scribbles: Rockefeller, raw materials, oil are not in the index. Nor is the Jewish 'news' source Reuters. Isaiah Berlin is quoted: "I remember it only as the most terrible century in western history". TV gets a couple of small sections; Fleming on the 'Cold War' is unindexed; US labor relations are not indexed. There's quite a bit on 'modernising', for example in Japan, with nothing specific. We are told poison gas is 'barbaric', and based on German science and chemistry—guess what lies are beneath this.
Top of Page

Dennis Wise Greatest Story Never Told   Review of   Dennis Wise   Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story NEVER told   Formats: mp4s, DVDs, zipped video files
Collected Hitler Material Almost Ideal for Second World War Presentation to People Naive About Propaganda. (However, it is only a half-way stage to fully intensive revisionism).   This review first uploaded July 8, 2014

This file is also in the collection reviews-film-tv-dvd-cd-crit.html

Update: 17 Jan 2018: I've recently 'launched' Was Hitler a Jewish Agent? (with A C Hitchcock) on my website, examining the idea that Jewish power, submerged and kept out of the way, was easily large enough to encircle Germany and fund, corral, and invent what became the NSDAP. Although this idea must be common in Jewish circles, it was new to me. I have to suspect that the de facto copyright permission, and the acceptance of Dennis Wise's DVD in public, are tacitly approved, because they serve the idea that Germans and Russians had to fight, of necessity. An alternative view, that the war fever was generated with the usual Jewish methods, is therefore missing from TGSNT. Dennis Wise might test this idea by adding another episode, to see how well it fares.

Update: 8 March 2018: Dennis Wise has an online interview Claims of Hitler Being Controlled Opposition with Kyle Hunt (107 minutes, 28 May 2017 was the version I found), and which includes mention of his video Communism by the Back Door.

My own view is that Jewish spying has been underestimated: Bletchley Park had large numbers of Jews, which are understated (Andrew Hodges on Alan Turing says nothing about the issue), and there are reliable reports of cables in gardens which could have been used to broadcast from Britain. Jews in the USSR must have had elaborate communications, including landlines for their money transactions. The USA didn't yet have the CIA, but of course had spying—for example, on the Japanese. So it's unquestionable that, while the war continued in its own way, Jews were carrying out their own secret operations. Whether Hitler was involved is a controversial issue for many, but Wise takes the conventional view at all times, Germany vs USA, USSR, Britain, without realising Jews were (probably) shaping things to suit themselves.

      Here are some of Wise's remarks:
  • Wise has a Catholic view (probably taken from his father; Northern England has remainders of this view). He regards the French Revolution, 'Russian' Revolution, Spanish Revolution, and Mexican Revolution "and on and on" as more or less the same, in which royalty, and the church, were destroyed. This seems only a partial view, to me; it does not cover the US Civil War, as Wise notes.
  • After the First World War came to an uneasy end, there was a communist revolution in Germany (and some other countries). "Europe was looking for someone to turn to. Communism in Europe, a German book available online in English, describes how Germany was taken over for a few days. At this time, Hitler started—the passion is unreal" says Wise.
  • Many issues are mentioned: Why not conquer Switzerland? Did Operation Barbarossa lose Hitler the war—it would have brought down Stalin, but for Roosevelt and Churchill supporting Stalin. What about offers of peace, sending Rudolf Hess? Was Hitler a secret Freemason, and/or a coward? Hitler did in fact lose the war, with huge numbers of deaths and the Jew world order! The Holohoax—nobody in the 'west' could investigate Soviet camps. There were two sets of Jews in the USSR—Americanised capitalist type, and Soviet—and Stalin perhaps disliked the former and was anti-Semitic in that sense; Stalin distrusted and killed when possible anyone who'd lived outside the USSR. Then crypto-Jews, hidden Jews, and outright boasts they want white genocide. Night of the long knives "always amuses me ... how people who hate Hitler worry about infighting in the Nazi party ... treaty of Versailles - SA far larger than the army... a leader has to have a ruthless streak"
I didn't find Wise's material to be very convincing (especially from someone who'd spent years working on the subject).
Rae West 16 Sept 2017 A new video series, in (I think) ten parts, typically averaging more than an hour, EUROPA - The Last Battle, has been uploaded on Youtube by EUROPA Tv (that link may cease to work, of course). It is in a similar style to Dennis Wise's video series. The only written plans for genocide during the 20th-century was not a German plan to exterminate the Jews but rather Jewish plans to exterminate the Germans. ....
Important note on Revisionism Miles W Mathis (as far as I know) pioneered the work in a new school of thought, according to which the whole Second World War was orchestrated behind the scenes by Jews, with Hitler and Mussolini and other 'public' figures acting their parts. By Mathis' standard, both Wise's work and Europa Tv fall short of the truth, though no doubt they were and are a necessary stage in revisionist progress.

Dennis Wise—a pseudonym, I think—started his work on Adolf Hitler (I'm pretty sure; some of these statements may not be precisely correct) in 2012. At that time, Youtube had a 15-minute limit on videos, at least for most uploaders. Wise's videos, issued under the nickname TruthWillOut, seem not to have been numbered at the start. Wise added to them, completing his series in 2013. At least, that seems to have been his plan: since then further segments or episodes have been added: Part 25 is post-German defeat reminiscences (Patton, several Germans) plus a survey contrasting war (and peacetime) criminals Stalin, FDR, Churchill and Truman with Hitler. Part 26 is 'Sources', or 'Credits and Thanks': these are in three parts: books, youtubes, and websites. These are not very professionally identified: books are listed alphabetically, by title, without publication dates, and not in the usual author name sequence. Youtubes (in any case difficult to identify, as the titles can easily be changed or imitated, and the accounts can change or vanish) are listed alphabetically by first names; and websites are in alphabetical order, some recommended rather than relevant to the videos. There is no list of influential suppressed authors (Henry Beamish, Ezra Pound, Archibald Ramsey, Paul Hogan, F T P Veale...).

When I watched a download (online viewing isn't recommended by me, unless your broadband is very reliable—the full Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told is nearly six hours) I was amazed to find that none of the material was independently filmed by Wise; it seems to have all been taken from downloads. The version I watched is 640 by 360 pixels, not high resolution and in fact not good enough to make easy reading of the scrolling text (white serif text on black; some titles in red) which presumably was written by Wise, who avoided voiceovers. The result is a mixture of old black and white film, with some colour film from the time, and 'faction' style filmed reconstructions, so that occasionally well-known actors appear playing Hitler. I think I recognised Jeremy Irons' voiceover in several places. There are cinema newsreel sequences. And extracts from much later TV documentaries, in colour. All the subtitles are in English; if there are subtleties in translating from German, they are lost. I'm told for example that Blitzkrieg was not a German word, but was invented by British propagandists, embarrassed at German success.

The soundtrack is for my taste obtrusive: Wise has modelled his video on traditional documentaries, which of course have unsourced film, commentaries intended to be authoritative despite being read by actors, music tracks, and almost no signposting apart from occasional names in subtitles. But traditional documentaries are generally part of the Jewish lie factory, and unconcerned with truth. Maybe Wise made a mistake in not rethinking. His soundtrack has a 'Lord of the Rings' feel; there are some repetitions, Saga's Slaget ved Stalingrad, some tracks from Globus's Epicon. I don't remember any Wagner or songs by Sleipnir.

It has to be said the spelling and style of the on-screen titles and scrolling text is a bit erratic. 'The greatest story Never told', 'upmost' for utmost, civillian, decisions, both Pearl Harbour and Pearl Harbor, illustrate the sort of thing. Wise talks about 'Earnst Zundell' on his Youtube site; spelling is obviously not his strong suit. His sentences sometimes get a bit lost: 'Under National Socialism, Germany in only a few short years had dragged themselves from financial ruin and social degradation, to lead Europe in science, technology, art and literature will now be surrounded.' However, the most recent 'remastered' version may have cured all this.

I was fascinated by the copyright infringement possibilities, and not surprised to find his videos had been taken down by Youtube, though Wise doesn't seem to state anywhere what his attitude is to infringement. Many of the clips are old; there are issues with 'fair dealing'; the proportion of six hours taken up by any one clip isn't very high. My impression is that his website https://thegreateststorynevertold.tv (also www.tgsnt.tv) has a pay area for club members; from there, people pay to download, on condition they do not resell or otherwise use the material for profit. This seems to be to get round copyright issues—he's not legally allowed to charge for copyright segments, but joining a paid club allows for income. Cash flow is difficult for any revisionists, and I'd love to know if his business model works. But I don't.
      The DVDs on sale are mp4 format, zipped, and therefore don't play like normal DVDs. Copyright is claimed by Dennis Wise.

NB Amazon hosts large numbers of media things entitled The Greatest Story Never Told, but Dennis Wise's videos aren't included in them, and aren't on Amazon anywhere that I could find, perhaps because they can't be sold without copyright complications.

Here's a sample (in no particular order) of topics, each usually in one episode:-
Mussolini's rescue by Otto Skorzeny
Eisenhower: death camps for Germans after WW2, only recently publicised
Battle of the Bulge
Katyn massacre of Polish officers, and the slow process of revealing truth
Ukraine and the 'Holodomor'
Stalin's extermination of Uighurs etc; the vast area of the steppes, Siberia, and Muslim territories included large numbers of tribes dating back to prehistoric times. Dennis Wise hints at the death rates.
Stalingrad. I don't think the earlier name of this city is mentioned. Stalin's orders to keep all civilians in Stalingrad, and send troops to machine-gun any deserters or retreaters (or returned prisoners), are outlined
Porn in Berlin
Cossacks and their treatment by the British Army
Japan and Singapore and the Japanese empire, and Pearl Harbor, are of course mentioned
Danzig, cut off from Germany by the Versailles Treaty. And Jews in Poland committing atrocities against ethnic Germans given as the cause of Britain and France being 'at war with Germany'.
Dunkirk
Dresden bombing
'The British received over two dozen peace offers [from Hitler] between 1939 and 1941'
US policy of Mexican repatriation in the 1930s
Germany-USSR PACT ('Nazi-Soviet Pact')
Rommel, the 'Desert Fox' and his career
Indianapolis, torpedoed by Japan, returning across the Pacific from the supposed Hiroshima atom bombing.

I think most people would pick up some new detail or other, even if they think they know a great deal about Hitler and the war. By the standards of full-on revisionism, I'd say this package is about 2 out of 5, where 5 is some limiting state not yet achieved. If revisionism were graded like fuel, in octane levels, in my view it's true Wise is not at the highest level. On the other hand, most people don't have Formula 1 brains, so it makes sense to pitch things at a lower comfortable level. Many people simply have no idea of the weakness of the traditional case built up in the 'west'. See my short video of 15 or so Britons dated mid-2014 "Have you heard the idea that the 'Holocaust' was a fraud?" for examples of unawareness. For people like this, Dennis Wise's compilation seems to be exactly right and ought to work well. The division into bite-size chunks makes sense; and the viewers will, literally, have seen a lot of it before, so it won't seem weird or fantastic. The scrolling commentary will be new and surprising to them: just one example is Hitler praised as the most popular leader ever.

There are of course missing items: the start of the 'Great War'/ 'First World War' (as opposed to the Treaty of Versailles) is missing. The Bengal Famine I think isn't there. Faurisson's four giants and three dwarfs could have been mapped more clearly: the USA and the western hemisphere, plus the British Empire, plus the interlocking French Empire, and the vast area of the USSR, against the peanut-sized Germany, and Italy, and Japan. Probable murders by Jews (Patton, Forrestal, Roosevelt, Keynes? ...) and vast population movements forced by Jews might have been mentioned more. There isn't much on Jews funding both sides of wars, loving divide-and-rule, making money and laughing at patriots who do it for nothing. The criminal inaction of churches, refusing to expose the Talmud; detail on the BBC lie factory; the simple soldiery doing whatever they're told are understated, as of course is traditional.

A few myths have got through, for example Hiroshima as 'atom bombed', now known to have been a fraud: Wise's video uses BBC computer-generated imagery as 'evidence'. I'm suspicious of the widely-promoted idea of joy at the announcement of war, notably the 'Great War'. There were many newspaper accounts of cheering crowds and so on. But newspapers were mostly Jewish-owned. How enthusiastic were ordinary people, in fact?
      The apparent normality of such people as Churchill survives because of the intense censorship. One gathers his whole mentality was destructive—he delighted in planning explosions, death and destruction. It seems he often stank of his own excreta, rolled around drunk, buggered little boys when young and maybe older, planned murders where Jews supposedly benefitted; in view of his talentless schooling, one has to wonder whether his writings and speeches were in any way written by him.

More generally, there's a tendency, derived from the source material, to show things which are immediate and obvious: tanks moving, artillery shooting shells, marching men, bombed buildings, firestorms, impassable snowdrifts, and Hitler and others bellowing out oratory. But planes and bombs and tanks and weapons have to be designed and made; ships have to secretly unload huge numbers of tanks for Stalin; factories must make munitions; Jews in the USA and Europe and USSR co-operated to make war by secretly transferring money for Europeans and Americans to build factories in Russia; intelligence secrets (and decodes) went on, accompanied by lies and deception... these things are just as important, in fact much more so, but more difficult to get onto film. Questions about what might have been are difficult to show, too. Was Normandy invaded because it was clearly going to be a slow process, to allow the 'Red' Army to get to Berlin?

And the fragmented approach makes it difficult to appreciate the apparently inexorable flow of lies: as all this was happening, Harold Wilson in Oxford University in wartime Britain was already planning vast coloured immigration, Jewish control of unions, expanded low-criticism education after the war; Monnet and others were working on a Soviet-style European régime; Jews were planning ways to keep the USSR from any investigation, the fraud of the 'Holocaust' was being shaped, and the paper dollar was starting its long decline as Jews dipped into it to fund their huge range of projects: hiring collaborators and dupes, paying for Israel and destroying Palestine, publicising lies about race and slavery, using the promising new one-way medium of television, promoting legal corruption, political corruption, anti-white propaganda, anti-Christianity, NASA and many other fraudulent sciences, lucrative wars against almost defenceless people in Korea, Vietnam ....
Top of Page

Cinema WW2 Newsreels, TV 'Documentaries', War Films, in English. A Few Notes

Rae West. Sept 2020.
Just short notes on film and the Second World War, the world's first filmed (with fakes) war.

1951 USA Time, Inc Same format as the 'OF' DVDs described in the next section. My editions are by musicbank.co.uk and it's no clear what the sources are, who selected them (from more than six years of cinema newsreels and full-length 'documentaries').

1960-1963 UK The Valiant Years Narrated by actor Richard Burton.

1963, 1964 USA Battle Line 'A Sherman Grinberg Production. Written by James Sage and Sherman Grinberg. Commentary by Jim Bishop. Official Films Inc.'
      I bought these in an '8 DVD gift set'. These DVDs were about an hour each, in 4:3 format, not far from square. They were packaged in a hinged metal container. There seem to be several editions. The written commentaries are in Jewish victory mode, praising dead whites and others, and with no information on Jewish funding for weapons and everyday equipment, and of course no information on exchange of assets into Jewish ownership or on collaboration between Jews on the course of the wars, of which there were many small local wars.
      I bought these mainly to look at visuals of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the official material of the time, which helped me decide that nuclear weapons are a fraud.
      But of course they are surviving evidence, no doubt carefully censored, of wartime propaganda. Probably the single most important part of propaganda was the suppression of the idea, now rather obvious, that Jews collaborated worldwide in that they thought was their interest: For example, the 1913 Federal Reserve and its effects on WW1 (started 1914), its part in the Depression and later offerings of higher-paid work for ships, airplanes, bombs etc, the supply of money to the USSR (in practice, building factories and importing war materials to the Jews in the USSR). It was especially important to hide the Jewishess of Churchill, Roosevelt, Hitler, and Stalin; and to pretend they were isolated, in place of the truth that they were all surrounded by Jews. To this day Hitler is shown as he cause of war, impelled by insane ideology, with nothing said about Jews. Note that wartime propaganda said little about atrocities against Jews, which had yet to be built up.

1973, 1974 The World at War 26 episodes; narration by actor Sir Laurence Olivier. This was not by the BBC, but by 'Independent Television', obviously Jewish. 'Written by Laurence Thomson. Produced and directed by David Elstein. Series producer Jeremy Isaacs. Chief Historical Advisor Sir Nobel Frankland DFC.'

c 2012 onward The Greatest Story Never Told by Dennis Wise. Originally 6 hours, I think. Detailed review above. There were objections at the start on copyright grounds. Recently, I see objections because the role of Jews is ignored. I suspect it's permitted now because its spotlight is entirely on Hitler.
      The best writer known to me on full WW2 revisionism is French, Hexzane527. In the hope or promoting him in Britain, and maybe even encouraging intelligent comment, I've put him on my site, here.

RW 9 Sep 2020


Top of Page

david irving
The War Between the Generals by David Irving (1981). Cover not illustrated.
The War Between the Generals   by   David Irving (Published 1981)
Review: 'Rerevisionist' 4 March 2018

Entire chains of missing links
Irving's sources: largely Eisenhower archives in Abilene; the PRO in Kew, London; and Washington D.C. archives, plus diaries, as partly listed in his 'Acknowledgements'. (Many diaries were new to historians: some locked away privately, some officially censored, some inaccessible, some illegible.) Three 'initial legwork' people were Nicholas Reynolds in Washington, Charmaine Henthorn in Ottawa, and Venona Bryan in London. And other colleagues and interviewees helped. Note that the time spent by Irving is not stated; it's impossible to guess how long he took reading archives and diaries and transcripts.

Although this suggests a great deal of work, a great deal is omitted, and the possibility exists that, all the time, Irving was a crypto-Jew, and took the appropriate line. This book was published 35 years after the war ended, arguably more than enough for tougher revisionism. Perhaps his 'editor and publisher' Thomas B. Congdon Jr. had some influence. However, it may have been a natural progression away from Jewish censorship: Irving's Uprising! on Hungary in 1956 unquestionably introduced Jewish issues, and was published in the same year, by other publishers, as far as I've checked. In view of Irving's later legal challenges to the crypto-Jew establishment, the natural progression alternative seems likelier to me.

The War Between the Generals ('Inside the Allied High Command') deals almost entirely with western Europe; the Allied Expeditionary Force and 'Omaha' Beach and approach to Berlin looming large. There is virtually nothing on Stalin's Jewish mass murdering empire, and little on eastern Europe—a bit on Yugoslavia, a little on Scandinavia. Though of course they had generals, too.
      And very little on supplies and costs, for example oil. There are hardware sidelines: the artificial harbour(s), code named Mulberry, get a few mentions; the 'pipe line under the ocean' (PLUTO) none. The tanks fitted with canvas skirts, to keep them afloat, seem to have failed. The V1 is discussed, starting with the aerial discovery of large concrete ramps. In view of the primacy of bombing, with its numerous advocates, it seems odd that flak and air defences weren't boosted, but perhaps I'm underestimating them. Presumably Generals had opinions on such things.
      It's all at a rather trivial and gossipy level, rather like a 'soap opera' with characters with stars on their caps or helmets. Kay Summersby (Irish shiksa driver) and Eisenhower, and other mistresses play their parts. Hotels in London and Paris play some part; I wonder if hoteliers looked back on the time in the way Jews do the Weimar republic. The vast number of Americans in the UK—something like three quarters of a million—and social contrasts get Irving's attention, but he doesn't consider (for example) why they were paid more. But the Generals' dislikes remain at a rather piffling level, since possible important differences are not explored. I suspect Montgomery was permitted because of his total lack of Jew-awareness. Generally, all the material not taken from written sources is filled, even if unconsciously, by controlled propaganda.
      (P.400) Eisenhower decided unilaterally to wait for Stalin—very likely following a Jewish policy. ‘As the noted historian Sir Arthur Bryant would later write, the British were thus forced to witness "at the dictate of one of their principal allies" the needless subjection of the whole of eastern Europe to the tyranny of the other [sic] ... Huffed Brook ... "he has no business to address Stalin direct, his communications should be through the Combined Chiefs of Staff; ...’
      Irving writes: 'Kansas plainsman Eisenhower feared no Russians—... he felt that in their generous instincts, in their healthy, direct outlook ... the Russians bore a marked similarity to the average American.' Errrrmmm.

This sort of thing is worrying, since the ubiquity of Jewish secret working is unmentioned or unknown by Irving. (He describes Baruch at one point as a 'philanthropist'!) There are many questions: for example, how differently was presumably Jew-aware anti-Freemason Vichy France treated from the rest of France? Who place de Gaulle as a potential leader? (Irving notes de Gaulle's rather absurd self-centredness, but provides no background). Irving is unaware of Patton's murder, and Forrestal's, and no doubt others. He has nothing analytical on Roosevelt, or Churchill, or (later) Truman.

Irving gives plenty of examples of wartime censorship, and censorship after the war, usually I think face-saving matters. Note incidentally that Irving says nothing about Montgomery's rather obvious homosexuality—at least, as far as I know, being accompanied by a favourite young man. This gives some idea of the potential censorship even of not very important private matters. Irving says almost nothing about the notorious Hungarian Jew propagandist, at the BBC, Brendan Bracken, and other propagandists.

Irving interpolates his own views of character, which of course is hard to avoid in a world saturated with propaganda. He is impressed at second-hand by Stalin; it doesn't seem to occur to him that Stalin had full access to Jewish spy information, and could hardly help appearing to be penetrating, just as a colleague of Lenin said Lenin's predications were right about ten times' I think he said. Irving views Eisenhower (pp 10-11) as top of his class from the Army Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, and with an 'extraordinarily rigorous' code of honor. The James Bacque school of thought did not exist at that time, at least in Britain. Continentals were better informed.

As to weaponry (e.g. p 201) there are confusing reports, for example on Panther and Tiger tanks, mostly saying they were better, though one says the opposite (a typo?) and a New York Times comment, which for all anyone could tell may be Jews wanting more profit from weapon factories.

I don't think this book has worn well. I suppose revisionism is inevitably slow and erratic, and needs many contributors.
Top

Gerard Menuhin   Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil   (2015, revised 2016).

Published by Castle Hill Books, UK   and   codoh.com
This book seems to have been revised once, and have two ISBNs as a result

‘I rather fear the entire Jewish sob story from its inception is a lie.’   Gerard Menuhin has written a revisionist book (largely relating to banking, both World Wars, and the Holohoax story).   He is a 'Jew' or 'Half-Jew', son of a famous father.   What's going on here?
Menuhin: Tell the Truth

First, let me summarise the probable history of 'Jews' to date:–

Jews have a different model of a nation from most other people. The Mediterranean is the world's biggest and calmest inland sea, dotted with islands, and with timber at its east. Intelligent design permitted shipping of loads much larger than could be moved inland. Whoever controlled ships (call them Phoenicisans, or 'Jews') visited to ports of many countries, and established contacts locally, and established families who could be brought up resembling the locals—same language, same accent, similar appearance—plus the magical ability to bring in exotic products, and take away local things.
      Such a 'nation' is not confined geographically to land. It is spread out, a network of localities, a thalassocracy united by sea lanes, multiple ports in contact with each other, a distributed layer among nations. News: weaknesses, opportunities, assets of countries with which they deal, would be exchanged in their secret common language.

There must have been disputes over such things as food and water, valuable metal ores, land ownership rights, ownership of buildings, costs, types of payments and moneys. These must have been small matters, in comparison with events of recent centuries. However, note that a distributed network has the advantage of collaboration with many locations; it may have associates in some or all of those locations, leading to increased combined strength, which could be kept secret, or at least difficult to prove.

Since about 1492, there was a slow shifting away from Europe to a new centre of gravity nearer the Americas. Helped by science and technology, 'Jews' seem to have specialised in subversion, along with collaborators. For example, Amsterdam Jews collaborated to fund Cromwell against Charles I, when they funded cannon makers and soldiery. The outcome was the so-called 'Bank of England', which, by issuing paper money, impoverished non-Jewish Britons.

To this day, when non-Jews are told of war between A and B, they think in simple terms: A beat B and rules them, or vice versa. BUT War between A and B in fact is war between (A + Jews in A) versus (B + Jews in B). Jews are a third combatant, in secret, the secrecy maintained by bribes, violence, and blackmail. This needs control over news and information to operate. Jews gained control of news agencies, news and book publishing, and, later, radio and film and TV and Internet. The Jewish effortless capacity for lying has dominated in all big wars, including the Thirty Years' War, the US War between the States, and both World Wars, and wars of domination including the attack on Vietnam. Most of the participants—including many high rank in the military—hadn't a clue as to the part taken by Jews.
      It's possible that for example whites genetically evolved to understand local things, but lagged in the ability to process less immediate ideas and words. But perhaps this is teachable: many people now know (one example) that the 'Russian' Revolution was a putsch by Jews, funded at first by Jews in New York.

A lot of evidence suggests Jews are genetically inclined to mass murder of rivals; in both WW1 and WW2 they killed 'goyim'. Consider the deaths; consider if they were necessary. Another object may have been to establish Israel, though genetically this may well fail. An important aspect of WW1 and WW2 was poor communication and linguistic incompetence, by allies and their masses of ignorant cannon fodder. All Jews needed to do was weaken defences, bribe traitors, spy on commands, delay actions they disliked, direct money to temporary allies and arms makers, and control propaganda to every group. By the Second World War, most of the German and Japanese 'High Command' orders were intercepted. Bletchley Park was full of Jews. Vast numbers of documents were taken into storage to keep the truth hidden. There were vast numbers of deaths; propaganda in the form of war films and books ensured most of the survivors had no clue what had happened.

Second: Short Version Review of Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil

It has to be said there's not much original material here, unless you include fact of the Jew-related authorship. Gerard Menuhin has ransacked material (aided by Internet—he has about twenty years of online history to search). His book resembles Hitchcock's Synagogue of Satan but is illustrated and not chronologically linear. On the other hand, so much information is appearing, through the mists of Jewish lies, that almost everyone will find new materials. Gold stolen from Ukraine, and Jews and the Moldavian Savings Bank, for example. The book is available free online, from Castle Hill Publishers: click here. I assume this arrangement was acceptable to Gerard Menuhin. Not everyone likes reading on screen from portable documents.
      There are inevitable omissions. For example the movement to free Eire now looks like secretly-funded thugs taking money in exchange for treachery. And the poison-dwarf Kissinger's destruction of Vietnam—not forgetting simple Americans and scientists—is unmentioned. Probably the biggest issue now is what worldwide Jews did from 1914 to 1945; in my view the whole catastrophe was the work of Jews and their collaborators.
      Anyone who has never read serious revisionist work ought to benefit from this book. Expect something like a continual bombardment.


The practicalities aren't considered by Gerard Menuhin. It's obvious that creation of large amounts of free, fake money has to be removed from 'Jews'. There has to be action on Synagogues, the Talmud, and general awareness of 'Jewish' frauds. I doubt if censoring the Talmud would help—it's been tried, and one has to suspect that book burnings in the past, for example by the Church, were carried out simply to hide the contents. If information spreads, there will probably be groups of unattractive whites who want to join Jews and Masons and 'Common Purpose' and political parties and the BBC and junk Jew media. Conversely, some Jews may try to reverse their habits. It will be necessary to be secret and develop intelligence against 'Jews', and remove them from influential posts. At the end of my review, I've put notes on weakening and removing 'Jewish' power. At present, 'Jews' seem intent on raising the proportion of blacks in the world to unprecedented levels; maybe the world will become so incompetent that Jewish legal documents and titles will be disregarded. Maybe there will be a slow evolution; or maybe a sudden change. Perhaps competent historians, if there are any, might examine the results of large-scale bank failures, and/or large scale military mutinies or new policy pioneers. At least they'll have computers to help them.

RW 1 Dec 2019

Gerard Menuhin's book (I think originally written in French) is long and unquestionably contains many portions of the staple diet of revisionists. One of the few books on the subject written by Jews, it might be expected to specifically influence so-called 'Jews'. (Menuhin says he earned a place ‘on a list of 7,000 Jews who have made themselves unpopular with their fellows’). It's possible for example that Menuhin's book may be part of Jewish controlled opposition, omitting the most serious charges against Jews, or omitting serious weaknesses of Jews. I'll try to ensure this is a serious review, and my summary (above) is a guide to my views.

Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil: Recognize the True Enemy and Join to Fight Him has four chapters, in more-or-less descending size order:–  I THWARTED: HUMANITY’S LAST GRASP FOR FREEDOM | II IDENTIFIED: ILLUMINATION OR THE DIAGNOSTIC OF DARKNESS | III EXTINGUISHED: CIVILIZATION | IV FINAL STAGE: COMMUNIST VASSALAGE. And a bibliography of English titles. And a three-column index of names.

Glancing at online reviews, I'm fairly sure the first edition had less illusive titles, including Hitler, for example; but if so I haven't been able to relocate them. And there's no signposting in the book, nothing in the way of an 'analytical table of contents'. Menuhin is a discursive type, like a speaker who prefers his own voice to clarity. His book is punctuated by many of the quotations familiar to revisionists (in English), found, for example, in Hitchcock's Synagogue of Satan. The hooknosed Rothschilds at their games, Balfour, International Red Cross figures for camps, David Irving on Dresden, Arthur Koestler on Khazars, Orwell 1984, Ernst Zündel. My own website may have loaned him a section by Francis Dvornik. Other names, which revisionists will recognise as furnishing short quotations include: Cicero, Voltaire, Rabbi Reichhorn, John Swinton (US press), Henry Wickham Steed, Nesta Webster ('conspiracy' histories), Arthur Lane, Denis Fahey, Emil Ludwig, Louis T McFadden, Truman (diary), Charlotte Iserbyt, Jüri Lina (USSR Jews). And Henry Strakosch, Count Cherep-Spiridovich.
      An interesting reference book, no doubt very secret, is given by Menuhin as Americans of Jewish Descent, by Jewish historian Malcolm H. Stern, supposedly a book weighing 10 pounds, of which only 550 consecutively numbered copies were printed. This sounds like an American version of Johann Eisenmenger's (two-volume) Entdecktes Judenthum.

Unmentioned people—often a reliable indicator of an author's awareness—include BBC when trying to be serious, Austin App, Arthur Butz, Doug Christie, Andrew Hitchcock, Fred Leuchter's work, Kevin Macdonald, Bertrand Russell on Vietnam War Crimes and 'nuclear weapons'. There are some Talmudic descriptions passim, mostly of the sort opposing Christianity, rather than deeper material.
      I was disappointed to find Miles Mathis missing, but perhaps he's too recent, though his Beer Hall Putsch was online by early 2016. I'd recommend readers check Mathis' writings on Marx, Lindbergh, Ezra Pound, Douglas Reed and others; Gerard Menuhin is a bit naive about them. Hexzane527 is another excellent Jews in World Wars revisionist, so far rather suppressed. You might like my site searcher combining both Mathis and Hexzane527. (Mathis' science work is excluded).
      I couldn't find any attempt to decode the Talmud to disclose the roots of Jewish policies and attitudes. Thus e.g. Kol Nidre is unmentioned, the attitude to non-Jews—including death to researchers—implied but not discussed, the Jewish attitude to veiled threats undiscussed. Michael A Hoffman II, the only burrower into the Talmud I know of, is in Menuhin only as a reporter on trailblazing Holohoax trials. Hoffman's Talmudic researches aren't mentioned.

Menuhin says nothing about his own modus operandi when it comes to writing, but it seems to be the 'flypaper technique' of picking up bits and pieces. Arguably, when trying to present a fairly complicated and unexpected set of truths, this is a very poor technique. On the other hand, it accurately reflects the deluge of influences on populations subjected to Jewish lies; so perhaps it is suited to its purpose.

I   THWARTED: HUMANITY’S LAST GRASP FOR FREEDOM starts with Menuhin's personal life, including his schooling in Germany and Britain (he went to Eton), and his parents' attitudes and disagreements. He digresses into the astounding scandal of Silverstein, other New York Jews, and 9/11—the ‘N.Y. World Trade Tower incidents of 2001’—I refuse to use that ridiculous American abbreviation, whose self-importance assumes that the entire world is fixated on their country... which ‘allowed the “Global War on Terrorism,” the “Patriot Act,” “Homeland Security,” X-rays and lawful groping at airports to come into being’. But he omits the wars and the resulting destruction from Libya to Iraq and no doubt other areas.
      Then he moves roughly from the end of the First World War, to the end of the Second. The 'six million' figure comes in about here, and material on what later was called 'the Holocaust' by the tremendous Jewish propaganda machine, and material on and by Churchill and Eisenhower. There's a section on Hitler, and a section on Germany. Menuhin asks in effect why is Hitler still considered important after all this time? There have been many—well, he presumably means dictators or killers. Menuhin doesn't make the sublimely obvious point that Jews control the media; if Hitler is discussed, it's because the Jews who dictate to the simple public want it.
      Menuhin treats Stalin and Hitler as more or less equivalent, but opposite, juggling and jostling and positioning and fighting like kings in chess on opposite sides. Stalin as a Jew is out of his range; Hitler as a Jew even more so.

At least three points are raised spectrally, but left unanswered.
      First, of course, Stalin and his henchmen plus Russians forced into subservience killed vast numbers of Slavs in the USSR empire; far more than Germans.
      Secondly, it's been pointed out—and this is perhaps the point at which Jews will obstruct more fanatically than any other—there is plenty of evidence that international Jews controlled enough of the NSDAP to ensure Germany lost the Second World War, in a manner that maximised goy deaths. I could find nothing other than the usual Jew media presentation by Menuhin of Hitler. Or for that matter any consideration of restitution to Germany, or restitution to Russians, or Ukrainians.
      My third point is Menuhin's alarmist chapter title. Jewish mythology relies on a 'Moschiah' ('Messiah') to appear. Menuhin seems to assume the world is at its last gasp, but he never examines whether a world run by a minority of fanatics and liars could be stable. Could such a world be technically competent; or—in my view worrying likely—would it subside into violence and incompetence and pollution and loss of literacy and legality?

Part II   IDENTIFIED: ILLUMINATION OR THE DIAGNOSTIC OF DARKNESS (What?) This is the longest chapter. It veers from topic to topic in roller-coaster fashion. I'll try to reproduce the feeling:–

We have Maria Teresa of Austria in 1777, on Jews and ‘fraud, usury and moneylending and ... all deeds which an honorable man despises’. (These include prostitution). Many revisionists misunderstand usury to mean interest—a misdirection—when it includes taking over properties by forcing debt, and so on. And many revisionists think Jews and Christians were rigidly opposed; in fact the Church accepted Jewish money manipulations, tut-tutting ineffectually when people complained.
      We have a good account of the massing of forces leading to the privately-owned ‘Federal Reserve’, with Jekyll Island, funding selected candidates of the Democrats or Republicans. But much of this material is taken from a video called The Money Masters of 1996; this was before Youtube existed. And seems to be anonymous. Not a very good idea since videos can be edited to mean something very different.
      Then an 1891 to 1894 operation, by banks in the USA: ‘On Sept, 1, 1894, we will not renew our loans under any consideration. On Sept. 1 we will demand our money. We will foreclose and become mortgagees in possession. We can take two-thirds of the farms west of the Mississippi and thousands of them east of the Mississippi as well, at our own price… We may as well own three-fourths of the farms of the West and the money of the country. Then the farmers will become tenants as in England…’
      Then Metapedia, quoted on making Jews take surnames.
      Like the Bank of England, the name of the Bank of the United States was deliberately chosen to hide the fact that it was privately controlled. And like the Bank of England, the names of the investors in the Bank were never revealed.
      In 1861 came the American Civil War and Lincoln’s battle to save the Union. “It is not to be doubted, I know of absolute certainty,” Bismarck declared, “that the division of the United States into two federations of equal power was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained as one bloc and were to develop as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset the capitalist domination of Europe over the world.”
      Lincoln's 'assassination' is accepted at face value by Menuhin, probably wrongly.
      From this point on, [1863] the U.S. money supply would be created in parallel with an equivalent quantity of debt by bankers buying U.S. government bonds, which they used as reserves for National Bank Notes, the nation’s new form of money, instead of by direct debt-free issue by the government, as were Lincoln’s Greenbacks. The banks got interest from the government on the bonds and from borrowers of their Bank Notes—thus almost doubling their interest income. {I wonder if Menuhin understood this passage - RW]
      [After the small matter of WW2] There followed ... the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC; 1951), Euratom (1957), the Treaty of Rome and the European Economic Community (EEC; 1958), the Maastricht Treaty (1993) and European citizenship, the single market, the Schengen Agreement (1995), monetary union (1999), in full force since 2002, and the Treaty of Lisbon (2009); accompanied by the hordes of bureaucrats in institutions
      Then the French Revolution and Russian Revolution, with a lot of mentions of cruelty, and some mention of Jews.
      Then 'Islamophobia' as of course Jews seemed to think Muslims invasion of white countries was good for them. Menuhin doesn't seem to notice the fact that Jews were aiming at population replacement, or something.
      Soros (Gyorgy Schwartz) could and did in 1992—making $U.S. 1 billion in the process.” (Sydney Morning Herald, November 15, 1997).
      On Soros, Menuhin continues: ‘If the Bank of England is still private and run by the same types that founded it, Soros could have been enabled by insider information to enrich himself through that gamble, allowing him subsequently to fund such subversive “philanthropic” ventures as the Open Society Institute.’ Shrewd comment from Menuhin: my best guess is that Gordon Brown, who sold Britain's gold at basement prices, co-operated with Soros; if you're dealing with a few billion, presumably some people take it seriously, even if MPs and Civil Servants don't. I'd guess the slack-jawed homosexual traitor, Brown, in effect handed electronic money to Soros. Brown is still lying: see this short video. It seems Joe Lewis was another Soros type; maybe another Jew from Hungary. Now I think of it, Jews from Hungary have been two types: some were chemical engineers, and joined the nuclear fraud in the USA, and others collaborate with USSR Jews as torturers and dictators. A handy guide to Jews in different countries would have been useful, but isn't in Menuhin.

Part III   EXTINGUISHED: CIVILIZATION The extinguished civilization appears to be mostly Germany, or perhaps the whole of Europe, and Gerard Menuhin's life there and in the world. The National Zeitung and Töben's Adelaide Institute (I emailed Töben about an Australian called Eric Butler, but he never replied). Then laws against free speech, which of course are to be applied as Jews want, and are impossible to draft honestly. Menuhin lists Wolfgang Fröhlich, Horst Mahler, Ernst Zündel, Gerd Honsik, Germar Rudolf, Sylvia Stolz as jailed in Germany; there must be continual threats and menaces: it is an occupied country. Menuhin traces these laws in the USA back to the Smith Act of 1940.

Switching to the 'Great War', Menuhin says ‘If one man may be held accountable for instigating the First World War it is French Prime Minister Raymond PoincarÃ-’. Well, maybe. He's sympathetic about dead soldiery: ‘These expendable servicemen were ignorant perhaps of the greater issues, but infinitely more worthy representatives of their race, the human race, than the subhumans who sent them to die for no pressing reason at all.’ He writes of ‘heavily-armed but bankrupt nations’. Most of the time they did nothing beyond providing food, uniforms, cheap housing and so on. The way modern productivity is converted into nothing much is outside Menuhin's range.

Menuhin quotes PEN, the group supposedly helping serious writing. He doesn't seem to realise that PEN is just another fake.

Menuhin writes on Germany and the CIA and Merkel, revealing she's a Jew from Poland, or something.

The 'Great War', out of sequence, does not treat Jews as another belligerent, and is therefore not much use.
      ‘In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, ship-building, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press… They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers. (Congressional Record of February 9, 1917...)
      After the 'Great War', Germany had a Jewish 'Communist Party'. Hitler is known to have spent time there, deemed 'incomprehensible' by a commentator. But now we know better.

Part IV   FINAL STAGE: COMMUNIST VASSALAGE. It must be said that Gerard Menuhin likes his clich&eacte;s. "Throwing good money after bad" he writes somewhere, while showing the money is all bad. Just as the unexamined life is said to be not worth living, the unexamined cliché is not worth writing. He writes: ‘The only winners of the World Wars were the politicians and bankers who instigated them.’ Really? Many in American (‘with its hopelessly ignorant and uneducated population’) thought the 1950s were a wonderful time. The Occidental Observer has many commenters of that type.

      Gerard Menuhin's conclusion (mid-Chapter IV) is:

Does this mean that the entire Jewish sob story from its inception is a lie? I rather fear it does. Are Jews imposters or impersonators? They are imposters, in that they represent that they have some ancient birthright to Palestine, when they have none. They are impersonators in that they profess allegiance to their host countries, while working across borders to destroy these same countries from within.

and he adds:
However, it is hard not to hate them for destroying ancient regions I would have liked to visit: Lebanon, Syria, Libya; or for their rootlessness, for their parasitism, for their inhumanity, for their perpetual lies, for their lack of a credible culture; for ruining my world.

Menuhin seems to have found a final batch of Jewish harm, emerging in his book as painful unsequenced extracts one after the other:– Barbara Marx Hubbard | 'Carnegie Endowment for Perpetual Peace' | Illuminati and Weishaupt | Fish Report on Communism, 1930 | A Warburg wanting world government | ugliness of Jews | the Book of Isaiah | Jews killed Jews to 'create' Israel | Chabad-Lubawitsch movement | in the fall of 1917 the British government decided to transfer a considerable part of the forces fighting on the French battlefields to the Near East in order to drive the Turks, a German ally, out of Palestine | Ariel Sharon on killing Arabs | Begin and Irgun terror | Dieter Eckart | English ivy on oak trees | Genetically Modified Organism trade | EU police want a kill switch on every car | money is almost a joke | western Europe prides itself on having abolished the death penalty, but...

Peace among humans should be the norm on Earth. Yet to achieve this normal state requires all our energy.


WHAT CAN BE DONE TO WEAKEN AND DESTROY JEWISH POWER?
To start with, honesty is needed. We should honestly assess Jewish power. After all, many countries have influenced our world: Persia, Greece, Italy, France, Britain, Germany just in the western area. There's no reason to suppose another bunch on different principles shouldn't have effects. And it is not honest to ut all the blame on Jews.

      And, at least in my view, it's necessary to be honest about whites. In the previous few centuries, whites have burned, bombed, stolen from, starved and raped other whites. And they have burned, bombed, stolen from, starved and raped non-whites. Menuhin takes it as a given that if Jews pay with their fake money, whites and others will do more or less what they're told. If this remains true, it's difficult to see how improvements can happen. There have to be ways around this. Probably serious punishments will be necessary, including deaths and deaths of associates. And on a large scale. And with full retribution.

In any developed state of society, it is likely that some group could enlarge its fortunes at the expense of another group. There is potential instability, and this ought to be analysed scientifically.
      Robert Malthus is laughed at by Jews, who regard themselves as secret arbiters of life and death. But Malthusian principles will be needed. Consider the huge population explosion of blacks, for example.


As the truth about Jews spreads—if it does—there will be moves to take back assets, lands, money, education, and legal documents on ownership. If such things become clearly successful, there may be a general rush, spreading across the world. I hope so. Because Jews operate in packs worldwide, anything which weakens links between them, ridicules their mythology, isolates them in Israel or elsewhere, prevents them disowning debts, reverses damage they have done, prevents liars and traitors and thugs and war criminals, is likely to help.
Just a few more comments on Jews. Jews, as Kevin MacDonald repeatedly states, boost each other, and occasionally boost 'goyim' who tell lies in favour of Jews. There are quite a number of short 'reviews' praising this book in undeserved style. Probably this is natural to Jews. I'd guess the reports on Yehudi Menuhin were often of this type: John Ogdon told David Irving that Jews promote 'their own'. I would suggest readers ought to be sceptical about the value of the provenance of this Shame the Devil.

Slight disagreement with Gerard Menuhin
... But education is not about numbers, it's about reasoning. Universities used to be centres of higher learning. Only those with exceptional intellectual credentials were admitted to them. With the proliferation of 'new universities', came the preordained discovery of all kinds of new and (of course) politically correct subjects and courses that did not exist only 30 years ago, and hardly merit serious consideration, let alone formal recognition, today. They enable almost any Johnny-come-lately to scrape into a so-called university and emerge with a degree. Now, he can benefit financially from his expertise in psychology, for instance, by determining before a court that a pedophile and murderer may be freed after therapy.
I hate to be depressing on the subject of British Universities c. 1900. How wonderful they were, weren’t they? — The sad truth is that Britain was as subservient to Jews as now. Oxbridge did nothing about the Jewish menace and provided no help or guidance in the 20th century. Look up e.g. Hilaire Belloc on the utter unawareness of WW1 Brits. The ‘best’ were smug and out of touch with the policies taking shape around them; Bertie Russell was smug, Keynes was possibly a collaborator. Don’t fall into the trap of considering that they were wonderful, except at supplying lifetime incomes to nonentities. And don’t forget London University, set up as a discreet Jewish centre in the 19th century.


Final perhaps irrelevant note: I watched a TV interview of the most shallow type, on 'Elton Hercules John' (eh, John?) and noticed that an 'AIDS' 'charity' supposedly processed about half a billion currency units. 'AIDS' of course is just another Jewish fraud. As far as I've checked, his real name is or was Reg Dwight, and his mother's name seems scrubbed. Pinner is a harmless-sounding suburb of London, but has a synagogue where race legislation (designed to flood Britain with aliens) was drafted. Oddly, a TV ad for a 'candy bar' showed Elton John being turned into a black; very odd.
      I'm not even certain that the person interviewed was the singer, and not just an actor with absurd specs, bearing in mind the fake Stephen Hawking. Music colleges include in their exams scores in the style of Bach or whoever, and no doubt pop songs are part of the same educational procedure. Words of the ethereal low-meaning type (Gee I sure get low when the sun goes down) were his staple. Probably also he had a role of minimising the harm done by drugs, and the harm done by homosexuality. This sort of thing spreads like mould under Jewish influence.
© Rae West. Uploaded 1 Dec 2019.

Top of Page
image   Review of US holocaust revisionism   A. R. Butz: Hoax of the Twentieth Century

Thirty-fifth anniversary of this pioneering work, June 26, 2010

Butz's book was first published in 1975, followed by a second edition in 1977. It seems to have been produced on an IBM compositor—a film ribbon proportional-spacing typewriter. Butz's methodology once his interest had been ignited, was to obtain documents and books, some in German and French, through the university inter-library loan system. (He is or was an electrical engineer, specialising, as I understand in pylons and electrical transmission). So far as I know, this was the first ever detailed book specifically on holocaust revisionism. As might be guessed, it's been the target of red-faced rage and indignation, but no point-by-point refutation has been written. It's far better known in the USA than Britain—look at the comments on amazon.com from about 2000 onwards, and the extreme distribution of 5-star and 1-star reviews, usually a sign of a 'controversial' book. An updated online version exists; in fact, of course, Internet now allows Butz to be read online. However, the 3rd edition (2003) exists as hard copy.

Top of Page
image   Review of Jewish interest   Bradley R Smith: Break His Bones: The Private Life of a Holocaust Revisionist

Courageous and interesting (but one topic only), March 5, 2011

Interesting book and low-cost; it's readable online in fact.

Bradley Smith has considerable courage—or maybe he just likes taking on an apparently formidable opponent. Founding CODOH is not something a conventionally prudent person would do.

He describes (among other things) his life experiences (few details given, though; has he killed anyone?)/ his first reaction to the taxpayer-funded Holocaust industry building in Washington/ his Spanish wife who's sceptical of his income-generating skills, quoting what sounds like the Spanish version of 'a bird in the hand..'/ the various intellectual games with the ADL etc. I'm tempted to suggest his literary-, and maybe life-, styles are modelled on Hemingway.

I haven't read this very carefully, because there seems to be a missing analytical section. Consider someone like Foxman of the ADL: he's rich in a dollar sense, but compared with the big shadowy figures, the Rothschilds and the rest, he's a small figure. He is paid to lie, like some advertisers, lawyers, or diplomats. If he can't answer, he has to evade and dodge. He has to threaten and bully and use secret thuggery. He has to promote and bend ridiculous laws and exploit their small print. He simply has no option: he can't stop and dismount. He'll go on and on, as will the thousands of similar 'chosen' fanatics. No doubt on his deathbed he'll still be spouting lies with subsidiary clauses. Now Bradley Smith is very good in describing the manoeuvres that necessarily happen when trying to deal with such people. But the real importance is the endgame. And I don't think Smith has a feel for this. There have been huge frauds in the past—but how have they been brought down—if indeed they have? Are there lessons from 9/11, from NASA, from Tonkin, from Hiroshima? Should academics be granted tenure in a more serious sense? Should laws be tightened up to force people to give testimony? Should professional liars be punished in some way proportional to the effects of their lies? Should their collaborators in lies (think e.g. Spielberg) be treated similarly? Should there be retrospective compensation for people who turn out to be libelled? Should all people caught up in huge swindles be guaranteed (say) $25M for full details leading to punishments? I don't know, and I don't think he does—though to be fair nobody in four centuries has come up with anything helpful. His descriptions are a bit like descriptions of bullfights, with Bradley, almost alone, waving his capote; and various cavortings taking place with dangerous snorting animals. It remains to be seen whether he defeats the bull, or is gored himself.
Top of Page

image   Review of Jewish interest ww2   Patrick J. Buchanan: Churchill, Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World

Half-way piece of revisionism designed to conceal part of the truth, July 11, 2010

Interesting book and incidentally not as bulky as it's made to appear—large typeface in the text and huge bibliography see to that.
28 Feb 2021: I'm listening to a 55 minute audio on Andrew Carrington Hitchcock's Internet radio site. A 48 minute monologue by Dr Peter Hammond, a laughably gullible Christian. The episode is saved on https://big-lies.org/media/2021-02-25-ACH1459-Hammond-on-WW2.mp3 which is part of this site. Its title was The Real History You Can Find In Patrick Buchanan “Churchill, Hitler And The Unnecessary War” on February 25, 2021.

Hammond makes no mention of Jewish money and Jewish interests, including killing non-Jews, collecting assets of all types, and propagandising Jewish lies. And seems to have no idea about Churchill's Jewishness and the support for Stalin and Jews in Russia. Nor of the support by Jews for Hitler, to establish the next war. Fascinating to listen to Hammond, who is utterly simple. Re-examination of Churchill's 'errors', to check how they fall into place with Jewish plans, isn't mentioned by Hammond.
      Hitchcock offered no critique whatever. He promoted Hammond's websites on aspects of Christianity. And Hammond's 890 sermons.

*The conclusion is that Hitchcock is just another propagandist for Jewish interests. Disappointing; but there it is.*




I don't think there's anything new here; however the fact that it's published by a large publisher (part of Random House) I suspect marks a milestone. The post-WW2 German deaths are a relatively new mainstream topic, having been censored for about fifty years. The First World War material, in particular the secret agreement with France, is well-known, as are the effects of Versailles—self-determination unless you're German. Buchanan is (I think) unusual in considering the British planners of war reluctant; he misses out the gung-ho feeling of the time though a bit inconsistently he is sound on the vicious anti-German feeling promoted about 1940. Buchanan has done a half-decent job, literally, in looking at the results of war; I suppose at the simplest level you need a feeling for assets, before and after; populations, before and after; and the way these were changed. What's missing from Buchanan is the entire Jewish element. For example Buchanan deplores Leninism, Fascism, Stalinism, Communism without noting 3 of 4 were Jewish. And he says nothing about finance and the issue of paper money which of course became more important when the gold standard was abandoned. He accepts the myth of the 'holocaust' though he's quite good on e.g. Saddam Hussein's relative lack of power.

This looks like a history book. Really though it's a sign of a change of policy. For fifty years or so there's been a behind-the-scenes promotion of immigration into the USA and Europe. I say behind the scenes because there is no one promoter or inventor of it. There's no source, just a groundswell, which of course has to come from somewhere. In my view the people who have promoted the policy are having second thoughts. And about time too, in fact. However there isn't anything in this book to suggest Buchanan understands or will humanise US policy. The Vietnam War and other US atrocities isn't even indexed. Four stars because it's a signpost, not because it's good.

More on 2021: My site has supported Hexzane527 probably French, who looks at Hitler's "mistakes" and interprets them as evidence of Jewish policies. Buchanan (who apparently was a speechwriter for Ronald Reagan) does not look at Churchill's "mistakes" as evidence for covert Jew activity (though he lists some). I don't know anyone who has done this, in defiance of the absurd Churchill cult in the Jewish junk media.

Rae West 2010 & 2021


Top of Page
Uprising! David Irving   Uprising! One Nation's Nightmare: Hungary 1956
Review by Rerevisionist: 9 Nov 2015
First Published Twenty-Five Years After the Hungarian Revolution

I re-read this book partly to see if there are lessons within it for the modern world, as Europeans—some of them—awaken to Jewish corruption, deceit and destructiveness.

David Irving published on this short-lived revolution (1956, 1957) with information from various sources; an important one is the Columbia University Oral History Project (appearing as CUOHP). Another are BBC Monitoring Reports though I couldn't find an account of how these are obtained, presumably in translation. Probably at the time David Irving was still persona grata in official circles. Uprising! was serialised in Der Spiegel, which no doubt helps explain the similar-length chapters and rather journalistic style—short headlines, and plenty of human interest.

It's available on-line, in an electronic edition (2001). I have not compared this with an original paper copy; it seems likely to be similar, with an unrevised Stalin-influenced 'Cold War' feel. It even has material on Jews taken to 'death camps'.

At the time of publication Jews protested against the Jewish material, as of course is traditional. For example, David told me, Arthur Koestler disliked the book. Jews made about 8% of the population of Hungary at the time. But although there are plenty of Jewish names, the full extent of transnational Jewry is not revealed. So-called 'Jews' in the USA, UK, France, and USSR followed joint policies. In Hungary, the net effects of 'Jews' were to remove vast lands from the Roman Catholic Church; build factories essentially exporting below-cost products to the USSR, with large movements of workers and—with low wages— their wives, who had to work too. There seem to have been genuine peasants, working their own land for food; these of course were put into supposedly communal farms. The process was carried out by what are still called 'secret police' by historians, though of course they were not secret, at, of course, huge cost. And by the Jewish-funded 'Communist' Party, supported by 'state' (read: 'Jewish') news propaganda, thugs (I'd guess including gipsies), and legal measures of the sort that westerners are starting to recognise. In my view the 'Cold War' was propped up by mythological nuclear weapons. Hungary had some uranium ore (Irving writes) so here was an industry that fulfilled all Jewish needs: defilement of the country with mining waste, hard working conditions, and complete waste of time and other people's money.

David Irving notes Bela Kun, after the First World War:
The country would not easily forget the 133 days of Kun's "Soviet republic". Organised murder gangs, of which a later Reinhard Heydrich or Adolf Eichmann would have been proud, prowled the country on the orders of Otto Korvin and Tibor Szamuely, liquidating "counter-revolutionaries" without trial. In the same year Kun and his followers fled to Moscow, where they split into several rival factions. Rákosi, who had been one of Kun's officials, opted for Austria; he outlived his welcome there in 1920 and returned to Moscow. The new regime, led by Admiral Horthy, liquidated the rest of the Communist leaders in what came to be known as the White Terror. Since Kun and all his cronies had been Jews, the pogrom had unmistakably anti-Semitic overtones.
Note Irving's traditional Judaic wording: 'pogrom', 'anti-semitic'.

... Counter-revolutionaries ... Hundreds of thousands of landowners, capitalists, generals and bishops ... is part of the phrasing of a poster—'Jews' like anonymous messages. It is purely Judaic propaganda: nothing about Jewish finance, Jewish terror, Jewish propagandists, Jewish population movements; just a list of traditional enemies Judaics love to have.

With the rest of the world effectively against them, there were few victories, and a lot of destruction; more, mostly by Russian tanks, than in the Second World War.
Over at Stalin Square the mob had still not had its way with the grinning statue. Laughter gusted across the park, as somebody hung a placard on the dictator’s bronze chest with a crude slogan: "Russians, when you start to flee—I beg of you, forget not me!"

The statue had been sturdily built on the site of the Catholic Regnum Marianum church blitzed in the war, a twenty-five-foot Hungarian bronze monument to their own enslavement, cannibalised from the bronze statues of all Hungary’s kings and queens. A medical student in a white shirt had climbed the statue and noosed the first ropes round Stalin’s neck ...
Certainly worth reading for the accounts of events in a satellite of the USSR. I suspect the gruesome details were far worse than appears in Irving's book. But, I repeat, it is not so good as an overview, lacking a summary. As revisionism advances, I hope such work will appear, exposing Jewish activities worldwide, no doubt in the malodorous teeth (© Sefton Delmer) of 'Jewish' opposition.

Here's an online comment (by 'Floda' 3 Feb 2016) showing one lesson: '... When snipers start taking them out it will get their attention. This was very effective back in 1956 when the Hungarians woke up to their Zionist Hostile elites and began shooting them as they stepped out of their Government offices.'

If it turns out that Irving was a crypto-Jew, it will be necessary to show why he wrote this book. It's entirely possible that Jewish activities were under-rated. Or perhaps Irving's aim may have been to fail to mention such people as Rothschilds or their local equivalents, or the way Jews networked with other countries and other groups.


Top of Page
More detailed version | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

THE LONGEST HATRED
An Examination of Anti-Gentilism

by Inter-City Researchers

Published in July 1991
by
Inter-City Research Centre
31 Eastvale, Acton Vale, London W3 7RU.
Telephone: 081-749 0629

ISBN 1 873704 00 3


CONTENTS:
PUBLISHER'S FOREWORD
THE BANKING RACKET | The Bank Fraud: How It Works | The Bank Fraud: How It Was Invented
THE BANK ‘OF ENGLAND’ AND THE NATIONAL DEBT | U.S. ‘Federal Reserve’ A Similar Racket | Behind Those Bank TV Adverts...
CONTROL OF MONETARY ISSUE MUST RETURN TO THE CROWN | “Her Majesty’s Inspector Of Taxes” A Lie | National Independence: Japan Shows The Way
THE ROTHSCHILDS: HEREDITARY PRINCES OF USURY | A Russian Count On The Rothschild Dynasty
THE BANKING SYSTEM CORRUPTS ‘DEMOCRACY’ | Banks Create Inflation And Recession | Parliament: The Tool Of The Bankers | The Centre Of The Money Power
TYRANNY COMPUTERISED IN THE ‘CASHLESS SOCIETY’
COMMUNISM IS JEWISH | Bankers Control Capitalism And Communism | The ‘Cold War’ A Fraud | American Intelligence Officers Expose The Jews Behind Communism | Zionism And Communism: Jewish Twins | Why The Change In Eastern Europe?
THE REAL REASON FOR COLOURED IMMIGRATION INTO BRITAIN | Race-Mixing Is Deadlier Than The H-Bomb | The Race Laws | Plans Formulated Years Ago | Race-Mixing: The Lesson Of History Suppressed | “Make Racism A Dirty Word!” | Immigration And The Slave Trade: The Jewish Connection
THE MEDIA—AN INSTRUMENT OF THE BANKERS
‘ANTI-SEMITISM’ CAUSED BY JEWISH ANTI-GENTILISM | Talmudic Blasphemies | “Fundamentally, Judaism Is Anti-Christian” | ‘The Jews And Their Lies’ | Organised Evil
MASONIC SECRET SOCIETIES ARE CONTROLLED BY JEWRY!-- lewismasonic.co.uk online publishers --> | Planned Chaos | “Beloved Brethren Of Moses...”
DELIBERATELY CONTRIVED WARS | The Real Iraqi Conflict
THE TRUTH REVERSED IN ‘HOLOCAUST’ HOAX | Mass Extermination By Gas Chambers—How The Jews Say It Was Done | What Fred Leuchter’s Evidence Revealed Was Done | Anne Frank’s Story
THE JEWS WERE EXPELLED FROM BRITAIN ONCE BEFORE | Good Queen Bess Expelled The Blacks

PUBLISHER’S PREFACE TO APPENDIX
THE BIBLE AND MULTIRACIALISM
ZIONISTS MISDIRECT EDUCATION
ZIONIST HOAX UNMASKED
THE DESTRUCTION OF EVIL—THE TRIUMPH OF GOOD


Publisher's Foreword

IT IS NOT a very commendable truism that in the Christian West today, we live in a materialistic society. But was it always so?
    There must be enlightenment somewhere if we only knew where to look for it.
    A good starting point is undoubtedly The Bible where, for instance, in the New Testament we find St. Matthew's warning in Chapter 6, Verse 24 of his Gospel: "Ye cannot serve God and mammon"—i.e. worldliness, riches and greed. Those six words of caution immediately suggest Christian soundness and common sense. We should remember too that it was Christ himself who angrily drove the money-lenders out of the Temple.
    Left to their own devices and their somewhat unusual ideas of a contented, rewarding life, native Britons in the past instinctively shunned great wealth, preferring simpler tastes, pastimes and possessions, free from the massive financial entanglements which bear so heavily on us as we approach the 21st Century.
    So, what has gone wrong? How can we start to give money its proper place in 'the daily round and common task' of life, without the burdens of insatiable borrowing which bestow a crippling legacy of interest-bearing debt upon our hapless children?
    Try taking a close look at what this little book has to say about the problems confronting all of us. It makes a lot of sense, as you can see for yourself, and "serving mammon" really has so little going for it. "Serving God", on the other hand, could quickly remind us that the 'power without responsibility' wielded by those who largely underpin and manipulate our day-to-day lives through money-mania, is no substitute for honest-to-goodness living.

Jane Birdwood, London
July 1991
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
THE BANKING RACKET

HAVE YOU ever wondered where the Banks get all their money from? When they grant you a loan or allow you an overdraft, where does the money come from? According to Frederick Soddy, former eminent Oxford University Professor, Banks are:
      “Institutions which pretend to lend money, and do not lend it, but create it, and when it is repaid to them, de-create it and have achieved the physically impossible miracle thereby, not only of getting something for nothing but also of getting perennial interest from it.”
      So the Banks create money out of nothing and charge you, the customer, over 10% interest to borrow it. And woe betide you if you default.
      It is a delusion promoted by the Banks themselves that they are merely the custodians of their customers’ deposits, that they lend these same deposits, and that their profit consists of the difference in the rate of interest they pay depositors, and the interest they receive from borrowers.
      The truth is that no Bank lends as much as a penny of the money deposited with it. Every Bank loan or overdraft is a creation of entirely new money (credit) and is a clear addition to the amount of money in the community. It is no more than a record in a Bank ledger or computer and is actually the creation of new money out of nothing.
      When an account is drawn on by cheque and the cheque is lodged in another account at the same or another Bank, a deposit is created and the supply of money increased. Thus Bank loans create “deposits” which are not the source of loan money, but rather the other way round—they are the outcome of loans. Banks can create credit virtually without restraint. But usually sound Banking practice limits the creation of credit to nine or ten times the amount of cash or legal tender which a Bank holds.
      When it is said that a particular Bank has so many million in deposits, it is erroneously believed that it actually has this amount of money to lend out. It is a complete delusion. Those deposits are not cash at all—they are nothing but an enormous superstructure of credit.
      In the early thirties, the Great Depression was deliberately contrived by restricting credit (overdrafts, loans) and plunging nations into unemployment and bankruptcy for millions. In this planned crisis there was no shortage of goods, the shops and stores were full, but the Banks stopped the flow of money.

      Governments, councils, businesses and industry are in bondage to the Banks. Banks being the only source of money, the community has to borrow from the Banks the money to pay the interest on the money it has already borrowed. Under this system we get deeper and deeper into debt. The debts owing on public undertakings are debts in perpetuity—they are seldom fully repaid. Debt is compounded on debt and interest on interest, ad infinitum.
      On June 25th, 1863, the Rothschild Brothers sent a letter to Messrs Ikleheimer, Morton and Vandergould at No. 3 Wall Street, New York, which included the following passage setting out the system by which Banks monopolize the creation, control and distribution of the nation’s money from nothing and charge exorbitant interest to borrow it:
      “The few who understand the system ... will either be so interested in its profits or so dependent on its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand the great body of people mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantages that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint and perhaps even without suspecting that the system is inimical to them.”
      We are the mugs who bear its burdens.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

THE BANK FRAUD: HOW IT WORKS
According to any dictionary definition, every Director of a Bank—if not every local branch Bank Manager—is guilty of a deliberate fraud and hoax against their individual clients and against the British people as a whole. The fraud or hoax is quite simple:
      A Bank makes an entry in one of its own ledgers (nowadays a computer file). This act brings a sum of ‘money’ into ‘existence’. That sum of ‘money’ is then loaned to a customer—generally by means of a ‘credit’ to his account, which he ‘spends’ by issuing cheques. The loan, however, must be secured by a collateral of real value such as a house, and must be repaid—‘capital’ and interest—in real money, that is, money that has had to be worked for and is therefore a token of real wealth. Thereafter, by another stroke of the pen (or tap of the computer keys) the ‘capital’ sum originally created can be made to disappear out of existence. It really is a magic trick!
      Many people believe that Banks only lend their own capital and the cash which their clients leave on deposit with them. This is far from the case. The total amount of ‘money’ which the Banks lend far exceeds the amount they have on deposit. It is only belief on the part of the borrower and other members of society with whom he conducts transactions—that Banks’ cheques and the nation’s currency notes and coins—are tokens of real wealth that keeps the whole system functioning.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

THE BANK FRAUD: HOW IT WAS INVENTED
The Bankers discovered how to exploit human credibility in the days when they were goldsmiths in the Middle Ages. They were the people who had strong vaults in which to store their stock. Other rich folk would hire space in the goldsmiths’ vaults to protect their valuables. The goldsmiths would issue written receipts for the gold and other precious items they took in for safe keeping. In due course these receipts became items of transaction. Then the goldsmiths realised that they could make loans in the form of paper receipts rather than actual gold or silver coinage.
      To begin with, they only loaned an amount which was equivalent to the total worth of the valuables they held in store. Eventually, when they realised that rarely, if ever, all their clients simultaneously withdrew their valuables from storage, they began to issue ‘paper’ loans far in excess of the actual wealth in their vaults. Thus began the great swindle that was to accrete to the Bankers their enormous affluence and inordinate power.
      How that wealth and power built up can be appreciated from the fact that in England, prior to their expulsion in 1290, Jewish bankers were charging their clients two pence (2d.) in the shilling per week interest. [12 pennies in one shilling, 20 shillings in £1—remember?] At the end of just one year, even at simple interest, the borrower would owe eight shillings and eight pence in interest plus the original one shilling ‘capital’. At compound interest, at the end of a year the borrower would owe a staggering one hundred and eleven pounds, five shillings—plus the original shilling!
      Early in 1991 a very brief reference to this usury was made in a BBC2 TV ‘documentary’ about the ‘persecution’ of the Jews in England in mediaeval times. The programme quite ignored the terrible social consequences of such usury, and merely remarked that such interest rates were “usual”! That fact served to show who was ‘persecuting’ whom in those days—as in these! As an aside, it is noteworthy that the Jewish-run film and TV media love to churn out films about Italian/Sicilian Mafia “loan sharks” whose activities are rightly put on a par with drug-dealing and prostitution. When did you last see a film about Jewish money-lenders—even mediaeval ones—with their activities thus described? Where Jewish money-lenders, of any era, are featured in films they are always depicted as self-sacrificing charity donors and/or sponsors of ‘enlightened’ political causes and/or great patrons of the Arts. Yet the man who consolidated the Mafia’s ‘banking operation’ and thereby created the international crime syndicate known as the ‘Cosa Nostra’ was the Zionist Jew Meyer Lansky. That crime empire should more correctly be described as ‘The Kosher Nostra’!
      The Jewish Bankers in the mediaeval era were able in England and throughout Europe to enforce their usury on the generality of the population because they cleverly cut the local King in on their racket. The King’s soldiers and Law Courts could be relied upon (usually) to provide the Jews with protection and enforce judgements against loan defaulters. (As a matter of fact, this is pretty much how the racket operates today, with power-hungry politicians frantic for Jewish patronage and anxious to stick all four trotters as well as their snouts in the Bankers’ money trough!)
      Fortunately for the English people in olden times an honest man in the form of King Edward the First came to the throne. He became known as “Good King Edward” and “The Law Giver”. He opposed usury for sound moral reasons, took no bribes from the Jews, passed laws forbidding them to engage in usury and, when they persistently sought to evade this and also took up coin-clipping. He expelled them from the land in 1290 under the terms of The Statute of Jewry. (We will deal in greater detail with this great act of liberation in a later chapter.)
      As we know to our cost, the Jews were allowed to settle in Britain again by the regicide dictator and commoner Oliver Cromwell, and by 1694 they had got their whole racket in top gear again with the creation of the Bank ‘of England’.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
THE BANK ‘OF ENGLAND’ AND THE NATIONAL DEBT

“In 1694 JEWS created the Bank of England.”—The Jews and Modern Capitalism.
      The Bank of England is not English in origin and was not founded as a Government institution but a privately run Bank.
      The Government of the day surrendered its sovereign prerogative over the issue and control of the nation’s money into the hands of a private group of financiers. From this date to the present, successive British Governments have borrowed money from the Bankers to run the nation’s business and fights its wars—money which the Bankers create out of nothing.
      All unpaid ‘loans’ plus accumulated interest forms the National Debt. Income tax and all other taxes are not paid simply to meet all the current and anticipated expenses of Government—these are mainly paid for out of new loans—but in large part to service the National Debt which has been built up over centuries. Thus the whole country and its people are in pawn to the Banks and all the real power resides, therefore, not in Parliament but with the mega-Bankers who issue the nation’s money and control its value and distribution.
      The ‘nationalisation’ of the Bank of England in 1946 provided an opportunity to reverse this situation. But it was not taken, so the charade continues, although by slightly different means.

      For centuries the British people have toiled, laboured, starved and begged; not because of any shortage of food, goods and services, but because the Banks have withheld the means of exchange. They have created poverty in the midst of plenty.
      The Government offers Treasury Notes (the nation’s IOUs) to the Banks in return for money to carry on the nation’s business. Thus the national estate has been systematically pawned to the banks, and the people have been progressively sold into debt-and-tax bondage.
      Every Government, every municipality, every public utility is debt-logged, and to meet their increasing interest obligations they must do one or all of three things:
1. Constantly increase the cost to the public of the services which they provide, i.e.: higher Government taxes/local Council rates, etc.
2. Invent new sources of income, i.e. selling off publicly-owned assets such as real estate and the ‘privatisation’ of Government-owned industries.
3. Borrow more debt money from the Banks.
      As we know to our cost, they do all three, and the spiral of price, debt and taxation is ever upward.
      Reginald McKenna, one-time Chancellor of the Exchequer and a Chairman of the Midland Bank, addressing a meeting of Bank shareholders in 1920 confirmed that the Bankers control the Government and direct its policy:
      “Banks can and do create money. The amount of money in existence varies only with the action of the Banks in increasing and decreasing deposits and hank purchases. Every loan, overdraft or bank purchase creates a deposit, and every repayment of a loan, overdraft or bank sale destroys a deposit. And they who control the credit of a nation direct the policy of governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people.” [our emphasis]
      George Knupffer in his book The Struggle for World Power revealed that the founder (in 1694) of the Bank of England, William Patterson [The Financiers’ ‘Front’] stated openly that: “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.”
      Knupffer explained how the Bankers printed and issued banknotes, most of which was ‘book-entry’ money, passed on by cheque. (Over 90% of all payments nowadays are by cheque or credit card). He went on to state:
      “The Bank of England ... was the first payment institution which was legally empowered to issue state-authorised paper currency and, therefore, the Government itself became its debtor. Thus the State not only renounced its monopoly on monetary emission, but also agreed to borrow the privately-created money from the bankers... Not only the thing being done, but even the very name was a deliberate fraud and deception [it should have been ‘Bank of the Jews’] to conceal the essence of the deed. To create money out of nothing is to make valid and effective claim on all goods and services for no return, which is a fraud and theft, made worse by the circumstances that the money is lent out at interest ... it follows that those who have the power to ‘create’ out of nothing all the money in each country and the whole world and lend it as stated, have total power over all states, parties, firms, radio, press, individuals and so on. Therefore the powers or Parliament are largely ephemeral ... The power of Parliament in general, and especially with regard to money, is non-existent, and all the true sovereignty is in the hands of those private individuals who issue all money and determine its value and distribution.”
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

U.S. ‘FEDERAL RESERVE’ A SIMILAR RACKET
A racket similar to that operated by the Bank ‘of England’ was set up in the United States of America with the creation of the Federal Reserve Board in 1913. The matter was described in the South African patriotic periodical News of the World as follows: “Today in America the institution known as the Federal Reserve, which was also created by the International Bankers, carries more power than does either Congress or the President. In 1916 Woodrow Wilson said: ‘A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men....—and these few men are the heirs of those who long ago laid the foundation for the takeover of the entire world! ... bankers such as the Rockefellers, the House of Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Kuhn Loeb & Co., Lehman Brothers, are among those bankers who have tremendous interest in the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve has never had a public audit and all too often has acted in complete defiance of the Constitution of the United States...” It should also be mentioned that membership of the Board of the Federal Reserve has never been divulged officially; and that all the Chief Executive officers of ‘The Fed’ since its formation have been Jews. (Alan Greenspan is the latest.)
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

BEHIND THOSE BANK TV ADVERTS...
Contrary to all the glossy TV adverts about the kind and generous services offered by the banks to their customers, every year they destroy thousands of peoples’ lives and businesses—driving some to suicide—as a result of their high interest rates and high pressure tactics. The Banks have loaned billions to corrupt Third World countries. Many of these loans are said to have been “written off”. In fact what the Banks have done is cancel some of the debts owed by Third World nations and recoup their losses by upping their charges and interest rates to clients in North America and Europe. Set against this the fact that in Britain many elderly folk die each winter because they are unable to feed themselves properly and keep warm. An estimated hundred thousand people sleep rough.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
CONTROL OF MONETARY ISSUE MUST RETURN TO THE CROWN

ON 22nd DECEMBER 1964 Captain Henry Kirby, M. P., called upon the House of Commons to support the Motion that:
      “The continued issue of all the means of exchange—be they coin, bank notes or credit largely passed on by cheque—by private firms as an interest-bearing debt against the public should cease forthwith; that the Sovereign power and duty of issuing money should be returned to the Crown, then be put into circulation free of all debt and interest obligations, as a public service, not as a private opportunity for profit and control for no tangible returns to the British people... so as to assure the State and Nation the benefits of that emission and relieve them of the immense and growing burdens of a parasitical National and private debt; and to make certain that control passes to the taxed and is taken out of the hands of the present hidden unlawful beneficiaries of taxation ... this House calls upon Her Majesty’s Government to introduce the required legislation... to assure unprecedented prosperity with true sovereignty and liberty.”
      If our cowardly and contemptible bunch of politicians had supported Captain Kirby we would now have interest-free mortgages and virtually no taxation. We could have become the most prosperous nation on earth. But the Members of Parliament we vote for look after their own interests and faithfully serve the satanic Bankers who are wrecking and ruining Britain.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

“HER MAJESTY’S INSPECTOR OF TAXES” A LIE
Captain Kirby’s Motion made it clear that the name given to tax collectors—“Her Majesty’s Inspectors of Taxes”—is more than just a misnomer, it is a lie. The name implies that control over the issue of money is in the hands of the Crown in Parliament. It is not. It is merely a Government-organised service whereby the general public are forced to pay interest to service the National Debt.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE: JAPAN SHOWS THE WAY
The real reason for the amazing Japanese success since the end of World War Two is that they control their own money system and are served by politicians who put Japanese interests first. They take advantage of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and other International Banker-created arrangements designed to promote “World Free Trade” by getting their goods into other nations’ markets, but they erect all manner of barriers to inhibit, if not completely prevent, other nations selling their goods to the Japanese market. They pursue, in effect, economic nationalism, while British politicians of all the main Parliamentary parties—and indeed, the Establishment politicians of all the parties throughout most of the rest of the world—advance economic internationalism as a way of creating what they see as the ultimate goal for Mankind: “One World”.
      In fact, as we know, the only people to benefit from “One World” will be the Jewish International Bankers who will control its monetary and economic system and, thereby, control the World Government.

[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
THE ROTHSCHILDS: HEREDITARY PRINCES OF USURY

NO STUDY of the banking swindle would be complete without some reference to the House of Rothschild whose members have established themselves as hereditary Princes of Usury. The family business was started in Frankfurt in the 18th century by Mayer Amschel Rothschild. He send his sons to England, France and Austria to establish local branches, and within a generation this family held all the nations of Europe in the grip of debt.
      Early in the 19th Century Nathan Rothschild, founder of the ‘British’ branch of the House of Rothschild [‘Rothschild’ = ‘Red Shield’ in German] declared: “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.
      Nathan Rothschild was very annoyed to find in the earlier stages of his career in usury that the Bank of England refused to grant his banking house special privileges. How he brought the governors of the Bank to heel was explained by Virginia Cowles in her pro-Rothschild book The Rothschilds: A Family of Fortune (published in 1973 by the Jewish firm Weidenfeld and Nicolson):
      He arrived one day at the Bank with a group of henchmen and presented Bills of Exchange to all the cashiers, demanding gold. (At that time banks were then required by law to exchange their paper money for gold upon demand.) He did this for the following two days, disrupting all other business. When the Bank’s governors came to realise that he was prepared to demand at least £11 million in gold—worth scores of billions in today’s values—they took fright and quickly granted the special privileges Rothschild had demanded!
      It was on account of exploits such as this that in 1828 the Whig Member of Parliament for Hertford, T.P. Duncombe, addressed the following comments about Nathan Rothschild to the House of Commons:
      “There is—deny it who can—a secret influence behind the Government whose form is never seen, whose name is never breathed, who has access to all the secrets of state and who arranges the sudden springs of Ministerial advancement...
.       “... Closely connected with this invisible, this incorporeal influence stands a more solid and substantial form, a new and formidable power, till these days unknown in Europe; master of unbounded wealth, he boasts that he is the arbiter of peace and war and that the credit of nations depends on his nod; his correspondents are invulnerable; his couriers outrun those of sovereign princes and absolute sovereigns; Ministers of state are in his pay. Paramount in the cabinets of Europe, he aspires to domination of our own ...
      “... I trust that the Duke of Wellington and Sir Robert Peel will not allow the finances of this country to be controlled any longer by a Jew.”
—Hansard, 2nd. Series, XVIII, 542-3.
      They did—and the stranglehold of the Rothschilds and other international Jewish Bankers over Britain’s and the world’s economy has got ever tighter. Duncombe started to write a book entitled The Jews in England, but unfortunately he died before it could be completed and published.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

A RUSSIAN COUNT ON THE ROTHSCHILD DYNASTY
Major-General Count Cherep-Spiridovich—a member of the old Russian aristocracy who saw his beloved Russia decimated by the Jewish Bolsheviks wrote in his book The Secret World Government or The Hidden Hand (which first appeared in 1926):
      “Evil is enthroned in Moscow. The promoters are not Russians, they are Jews... all the Soviet Jews changed their names into Russian ... all the Czars were murdered by the Hidden Hand ... Modern history must be looked at as a mortal implacable assault of the Judeo-Mongol Invisible Government (headed by a Rothschild since 1770) against Christ, Christendom, Christian ideals and Monarchs.
      “... Baron Edward A. Rothschild V. is today the ‘Uncrowned Ruler of the World’. He controls the 300 men of the Hidden Hand, 300 billion dollars and 90% of the world’s press. Most of the ‘statesmen’ are his obedient valets! Now the Rothschilds are the Dictators and Assassins of the World.
      “The founders of the dynasty of the Occult Supreme World Emperors and World Assassins were Amschel Mayer, a Jew, and his wife, Gutter Schnapper, a Jewess, in Frankfurt-on-Main, in Southern Germany... Rothschilds are everywhere masters of the financial situation: there is one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild... The Rothschilds can start or prevent wars. Their word could make or break empires ...
      “The ‘French’ Revolution, as the others, was organised and financed by the Rothschilds in order to murder the Christians, to plunder them and to obtain ‘all the kingdoms’. ... All the revolutions and world unrest have been and will be organised by the same Jewish Occult World Government ... every bloodshed since 1770 was organised by the Rothschilds; and as they control 90% of the world’s press, it was ordered to keep silent about their nefarious deeds.
      “The Rothschilds wish to whitewash themselves as much as possible. They fear that the so-called ‘Christians’ might cease to be unheard-of imbeciles, cowards and boot-lickers. Therefore the Rothschilds pretend or claim their motto is “Concordia, Industria, Integritas”, while no family has done more to cause bloody discords and murders and has less integrity than these Satanists.
      “... The Rothschilds have been the backbone of all political and financial happenings since 1770. Their name ought to be mentioned on each page of the history of every country. The authors, teachers, lecturers and politicians who do not speak of them, must be considered dupes, hypocrites or criminally ignorant.”
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
THE BANKING SYSTEM CORRUPTS ‘DEMOCRACY’

THE PRATTLE of the Jewish former Chancellor of the Exchequer Nigel Lawson are just so many lies and falsehoods for the British sheep. His master, the Rothschild’s financial system, is totally to blame for rampant inflation, ever-more taxes and soaring interest rates—and this situation will get worse, not better. “Frankness and honesty are vices in politics”—The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
      So-called ‘democracy’ is an illusion; it represents not the will of the people but control by the Bankers. Long ago Benjamin Disraeli, the Jewish Prime Minister and protégé of Lionel Rothschild, put the real truth in a few words in his book Coningsby:
      “The World is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those not behind the scenes.”
and
      “Governments do not govern; they merely control the machinery of government being themselves controlled by the Hidden Hand.”
      All elections are an exercise in futility. A facetious choice between Tweedledum and Tweedledee. The pawns may change but the hand which moves them remains the same. Democracy is supposed to mean that the will of the majority is paramount. But even the unthinking can see that on all the really important issues like coloured immigration, entry into the European Community, the adoption of the Metric system to replace our ancient system of weights, measures and money, the wishes of the British people have counted for nothing, because politicians are the obedient servants of the mega-Bankers.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

BANKS CREATE INFLATION AND RECESSION
At the time of writing this work the main ‘High Street’ Banks are charging the average individual customer and small businesses requiring an overdraft up to 6 or 7 per cent interest above the Bank ‘of England’ Base Rate, currently about 12 per cent—i.e. a total of about 18 per cent interest! Attempts by the Conservative Government to revive the recession-gripped British economy (and their chances of getting re-elected!) by a series of 1/2 per cent reductions in the ‘Bank Rate’ have not been matched by the main clearing banks. The Banks’ policy in this regard has been given the approval of the Governor of the Bank ‘of England’, Sir Robin Leigh-Pemberton—further proof that the Bankers are independent of Governmental authority. In addition to their interest rates the Banks also impose on their hapless clients sundry “commission”, “transaction” and “arrangement” fees.
      “Money is not a commodity, though regarded and operated as such. Money is a mechanism of distribution. If goods and services are available, restriction because of a shortage of money amounts to a sacrilege. Goods and services are the correct basis for money”—Lieut. Col. J. Creagh Scott, Hidden Government.
      In Britain today, many old age pensioners are forced to penny-pinch on food and fuel when these are available in abundance.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

PARLIAMENT: THE TOOL OF THE BANKERS
With the notable exception of a few honest and courageous parliamentarians like the late Captain Henry Kirby and the late Duke of Bedford, all the people you elect to Parliament have made themselves the willing and obedient servants of International Jewish Finance.
      The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion state:
The administrators whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the art of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of genius who will be their advisers.”
      It is the age of Rothschild “Think Tanks” and “Experts” and “Advisers” who stand behind every government. The political leaders of this world are no more than pawns in the game that is being played out. The late Duke of Bedford tried to expound the truth in the House of Lords and published a book. He met with a premature death (murdered?). Captain Henry Kirby M.P., put down two motions in the House of Commons in 1964 to return the power of the issue of money to the Crown. Kirby met with a premature death a few years later (murdered?). The late Archbishop Temple died immediately after saying that be would do something about the issue of money (murdered?). United States Presidents Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy were assassinated for trying to return the issue of money to Congress as laid down in the US Constitution. The American War of Independence was fought over the payment of taxes to the Crown—i.e. the English Bankers. The money power is ruthless and will silence anyone who alerts the people to their planned take-over.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

THE CENTRE OF THE MONEY POWER
Britain’s great financial and commercial institutions, wealthy banks—dominated by the Rothschild-controlled Bank of ‘England’—Lloyds of London, the London Stock Exchange and the offices of many leading international trading concerns are concentrated in that small area of London known as ‘The City’—only 677 acres in extent and once known as “the wealthiest square mile on earth”. ‘The City’ used to be the Capital of International Finance, and though still a very powerful centre of usury that title has long since fallen to the financial district of New York (Wall Street, Manhattan).
      In New York are to be found, for example: The Rockefellers’ Chase Manhattan Bank, The Federal Reserve Board, Kuhn Loeb & Co., the Rockefeller U.N. Building, the Rockefeller-run Council on Foreign Relations, the Warburg Bank and all the rest of the international money-and-power mongers. Perhaps New York is the “great city” referred to in Revelations, Chapter 18: “... for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived ... And in her was found the blood ... of all that were slain upon the earth”.
      In his book Descent into Slavery Des Griffin wrote:
      “The small clique who rule the City dictate to the British Parliament. it tells them what to do and when In theory Britain is ruled by a Prime Minister and a Cabinet of close advisers. These fronts go to great lengths to create the impression that they are running the show but, in reality, they are mere puppets whose strings are pulled by the shadowy characters who dominate behind the scenes. History clearly reveals that the British government is the bond slave of the invisible and inaudible force centred in ‘The City’. The City calls the tune. The ‘visible and audible’ leaders are mere puppets and dance to that tune on command. They have no power, they have no authority. In spite of the outward show they are mere pawns in the game being played by the financial elite.”
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
TYRANNY COMPUTERISED IN THE ‘CASHLESS SOCIETY’

OBVIOUSLY the day will come when incomes will not suffice to pay both for essentials and interest payments to the Money Gangsters. When it does, the whole system will collapse by having become an unbearable and unworkable scandal. Then the Money Moguls plan to introduce their ‘Cashless Society’—which would make abject slaves of everyone—and set up their One-World Government with a World Dictator chosen from among the number of their own inner elite. This is the direction in which current trends are leading us.
      As George Knupffer wrote in The Struggle for World Power:
      “The steps being taken since the end of the last World War to create a European State are part of the preparations for the destruction of the national states and the establishment of the World Government”.

      To consolidate their stranglehold over peoples and nations, the Top Bankers will soon introduce their ‘Cashless Society’ in which all cash money—coins and notes—will be abolished. All financial transactions will be fully computerised. Individuals’ incomes (wages, salaries, pensions, etc.) will be automatically credited to their Bank accounts, and all payments automatically deducted. All traded products will have a Bar Code in which product name, price, weight and other information will be computer-scanned at check-outs. This system is already in operation in most supermarkets. It is a system that will accelerate the destruction of small independent shops and tradesmen as only the big chain stores and conglomerates will be able to afford such systems.
      In due course the Bankers plan to have every human being invisibly but indelibly marked at birth (by means of laser technology) with his or her own Bar Code. The six-bar Bar Code (‘666’) system will encode the individual’s name, address, family antecedents, and social security number. This information can be added to and amended at various stages of life with details of education record, employment history, current financial status, business interests and associates, Court convictions, health record, social contacts, friends, enemies, visits abroad, political views and associations, hobbies, etc. Scanners in Banks, shops, Government and municipal offices, the personnel departments of potential employers, Police stations and patrol vehicles, etc., would be equipped to access relevant parts (and in some cases all) of this data.
      In effect, people will become mobile credit cards. A simple version of just such a system has already been perfected to assist the authorities trace the owners of stray animals. This system would be the very ultimate in surveillance, making all of us abject slaves of the Financial Moguls and of the various kinds of State functionaries whose job it is to impose “Social Control”.
      Of course such a system would make certain types of crime, particularly financial fraud—except that of the Bankers!—all but impossible. But any such advantage would be infinitely outweighed by the stupendous power which such a system would bestow on those who operated it. Any individual who offended the Bankers or the Government hirelings who serve them could be cut off, electronically, from income, pension, employment, health care, housing and Social Security rights ... even the ability to effect a simple purchase from a shop. At the tap of a few computer keys any individual found to be out of step with the International Banker-imposed World Order would be cut off from society’s increasingly computerised life-support systems and rendered an ‘unperson’.
      The horror of this development was foretold in the last volume of the New Testament—The Book of Revelations (otherwise known as The Apocalypse):
      Chapter 13, Verses 16 & 17: “And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark on their right hand or their foreheads. And that no man might buy or sell, save he had that mark, or the name of the beast or the number of his name.”
      Chapter 14, Verses 9—10: “And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice If any man worship the beast and his image and receive his mark in his forehead or in his hand the same shall drink the wine of the wrath of God...
      Chapter 16, Verse 2: “And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.”
[Emphasis ours throughout]
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
COMMUNISM IS JEWISH

WE HAVE all been led to believe that the Communists are the implacable enemies of the Capitalists, especially the super-wealthy, and seek to rob them of their fortunes. The truth is very different. In his book Zionism Rules the World Henry Klein, a Jewish New York lawyer, wrote: “In 1917, Schiff, Warburg and their associates (super-rich New York Jewish Bankers) financed Trotsky [Bronstein] and Lenin [Ulyanov] who overthrew the Russian government. Their revolutionary followers murdered the Czar and his family and millions of persons in the Ukraine ... Communism is no menace to money control—it is an instrument of money power.”
      An official American Intelligence Report at the time of the ‘Russian’ Revolution revealed: “In February 1916, we learned for the first time that a revolution was being fomented in Russia. We discovered that the persons and concerns given below were engaged in this work of destruction:
Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff, Jerome Hanauer, Charles Guggenheim and Max Breitung—Jewish Directors of Kuhn Loeb & Co (Jewish Bank, Rothschild subsidiary, New York). There is scarcely any doubt that the Russian Revolution, which broke out a year after the above information reached us, was worked up and launched by distinctly Jewish influences.”
      The Report listed all of the people who came into prominence in the first Soviet Government from Zinovieff [real name Apfelbaum] to Zibar [real name Martinow]. ‘A’ to ‘Z’, they were all Jews. (A full text of the report appears in the book Plans of the Synagogue of Satan.)
      The Russian General Arsene de Goulevitch in Czarism and Revolution confirms that it was Jewish Bankers who financed the Revolution. Later on, (according to F. J. Irsigler in Who Makes Our Money?) the financing was handled by a syndicate of international Bankers which included J.P. Morgan and Rockefeller interests and Lord Rothschild. Rothschild “spent over 21 million roubles in financing the ‘Russian’ (sic) Revolution.
      The financiers’ participation in the Communist take-over of Russia was well known among Allied Intelligence services, but not a finger was lifted to stop them because they are the real masters of the world.”
      In a letter published in The Times on 14th November 1919, a British Army officer in Southern Russia—an eye-witness of the Bolshevik Revolution wrote: “The Bolshevists form about 5% of the population of Russia—Jews. (80-90% of the Commissaries are Jews). In towns captured by the Bolshevists the only unviolated sacred buildings are the synagogues, while churches are used for anything from movie shows to slaughter-houses. If a commissary, steeped in murder and rape, with mutilation, happens to be a Jew, as most of them are, should he receive exceptional treatment?” His letter goes on to describe in horrific detail the bestial tortures and mass killings inflicted on the Russian people by the Jewish Bolshevists.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

BANKERS CONTROL CAPITALISM AND COMMUNISM
A one-time Director of British Naval Intelligence, Admiral Sir Barry Domville, wrote in his memoirs From Admiral to Cabin-Boy that Parliament was controlled from behind the scenes by a “Judeo-Masonic Combination”. Commander Guy Carr, R.N., in his book Pawns in the Game quoted Domville as stating: “International Jewry, headed by the Jewish bankers, was the secret power behind the world revolutionary movement”.
      (Carr’s view was that the secret power Domville referred to was in fact the Masonic sect known as The Illuminati. Many students of secret societies and subversive cults hold that The Illuminati was Jewish in its intellectual inspiration—and probably also in its leading personnel. It owed many of its beliefs to The Cabbala and other esoteric Jewish texts. Certainly the opinions and techniques advocated by The Illuminati bear close comparison with the contents of The Protocols of the Learned Eiders of Zion. So in a sense both Domville and Carr were correct.)
      The Gangster Bankers created and financed Communism and have kept it going throughout the years with massive infusions of Western aid. They created it and they control it. The confrontation between Communism and Capitalism is a pretence. The Bankers, according to Douglas Reed in Far and Wide “plan to achieve their objectives through the clash between these masses”. Only recently a consortium of ‘British’ bankers granted a loan of £3 billion to China and some £2 billion to Soviet Russia. This means that they have given £5 billion in credit (created out of nothing) to Communists to buy British goods—mainly high-tech goods which could be used against us in another war. Think what £5 billion would do to help our under-funded hospitals, the aged and disabled.
      The Capitalist West and the Communist East are controlled by exactly the same people. “Only recently our race has given the world a new prophet, but he has two faces and bears two names: on the one side, his name is Rothschild, the leader of all the Capitalists, on the other, Karl Marx, the Apostle of those who want to destroy the other.”—Blumenthal, Judisk Tidskrift, 1929, Sweden.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

THE ‘COLD WAR’ A FRAUD
For nearly half a century the West spent untold billions of pounds/trillions of dollars to defend itself against an enemy which it created itself and continues to maintain. Communism in Russia would have collapsed years ago had it not been for the constant infusions of Western aid. And why? Because the Jews who control both camps have plundered the West to build up their system of Communism with which to threaten the rest of the world
      The Soviet military machine is almost entirely the creation of the West, and there is no such thing as “Soviet technology”—only Western technology on Soviet soil. Since 1917, 90-95% of ‘Soviet’ technology has come from the United States and Western Europe. We have built for—or sold, or traded, or given outright to—the Communists everything from steel mills to tyre factories, from copper wire to motor vehicles, from missile equipment to computers. Major Jordan’s Diaries (New York, 1951) revealed that America delivered to the Soviets “tons of materials for the manufacture of Atomic bombs”. Commander Baillie Grohman, R.N., stated in the British newsletter Candour that Russia had complete access to all of Britain’s technology. Professor Antony Sutton conducted a massive in-depth study of East-West trade and published his findings in National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union. He provided masses of evidence to prove and confirm that “Russia was made in America”.
      John Stockwell, of the US Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) broke his secrecy oath to reveal in his book In search of Enemies that America and Russia are not enemies but loyal allies pursuing the same objective: A One-World Socialist-Communist Dictatorship. (See Henry Kissinger—Soviet Agent by Frank Capell).
      Louis Marshalko, on page 227 of his book World Conquerors, quoted Chaim Weizmann (the Rothschild-funded leader of Zionist-Jewry during the first half of the 20th Century) as saying:
      “We are one people despite ostensible rifts, cracks and differences between the American and Soviet democracies. We are one people and it is not in our interest that the West should liberate the East, for in doing this and in liberating the enslaved nations the West would inevitably deprive Jewry of the eastern half of its world empire.”
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS EXPOSE THE JEWS BEHIND COMMUNISM
Colonel John Beaty of US Military Intelligence stated in his book Iron Curtain Over America that Communism was imposed on Russia by Jews, that members of the same tribe had infiltrated the American Government and Administration and were the real directors of America foreign policy. Furthermore, they controlled the American media, were brainwashing the people, undermining the Constitution and destroying America from within.
      Major Robert Williams of American Counter Intelligence, revealed in his book The Ultimate World Order that there was “A Jewish World Power movement hidden inside the Communist movement” and that “it is the Anglo-Saxon who must be undermined, softened, brainwashed, made to breed with the dark races if the Zionists are to win”. He projected that the master strategists would precipitate a Third World War between the Zionist State of Israel—backed by America and the West—and the Arab-Moslem World, supposedly backed by the Soviets, the real objective, however, was to destroy the industrial and military capacity of the West and Communism. He regarded Communism as merely a temporary tool of Jewish ambition, and predicted that a Jewish World Super State would be built on the ruins created by such a war. He concluded: “Unless the American people recapture their government and smash the Zionist machine, the insane elements within that machine may wipe out Mankind”.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

ZIONISM AND COMMUNISM: JEWISH TWINS
Douglas Reed stated that Communism and Zionism both sprang out of the Jewish ghettoes of Eastern Europe—one to undermine Government from above and the other from below, and that the final objective of both these movements is the same: Jewish World Government..
      The late King Faisal of Saudi Arabia who, you will recall, was assassinated, revealed the truth about Communism when he described Zionism as “the Mother of Communism”, in an interview published in Newsweek magazine on 2lst December 1970. He added “It helped to spread Communism around the world. It is now trying to weaken the US and if the plan succeeds they will inherit the world ... it’s all a great plot. They
[Russia and Israel] are only pretending to work against each other in the Middle East... The Zionists are deceiving the US.. the Communists are cheating the Arabs, but actually they are in league with the Zionists ... Zionism and Communism are working hand-in-glove to block any settlement [in the Middle East] that will restore peace.”
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

WHY THE CHANGE IN EASTERN EUROPE?
The present moves in Russia and elsewhere behind the so-called ‘Iron Curtain’ to give Communism a more human face may be no more than a propaganda exercise to deceive and soften-up the people of the West. However, we should remember the prediction of David Ben Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel, published in Look magazine of 16th January 1962:
      “The image of the world in 1987.. the Cold War will be a thing of the past. International pressure of the constantly growing intelligentsia in Russia for more freedom and the pressure of the masses for raising their living standards may lead to a gradual democratization of the Soviet Union.
      “On the other hand, the increasing influence of the workers and farmers, and the rising political importance of men of science, may transform the United States into a Welfare State with a planned economy. Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a socialist and democratic regime—with the exception of USSR—as a Federated Eurasian state. All other continents will become united in a World Alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force ... Jerusalem will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind.” [Emphasis ours].
      In other words, the union of Eastern and Western Europe will be a prelude to Jewish World Government.
      The Eastern Bloc countries must seem to become more liberal and democratic preparatory to their absorption into a United States of Europe. A multi-billion pound ‘loan’ to Poland by the European Community is being mooted to prop up its inefficient economy. This means that British resources will pour into Poland instead of helping the British people. The Poles are hard-working and their present economic mess is due to the corrupt alliance between International Bankers and their previous Communist government.
      It was recently announced that the industrialised nations—including Britain—have agreed on a £36 billion aid plan to “help the new European democracies to develop”. Parallel with this is the setting up of a European Central Bank for the use of emergent Eastern Bloc nations requiring loans. This will bring new problems as once again the money is created out of nothing as an interest-bearing debt.
      What price our government’s claim that British workers’ pay rises are fuelling inflation?
      The newly-established European Central Bank must therefore be a stage in the eventual setting up of a Jewish One World Central Bank with a single currency. Moves are already under way to establish a single European currency.
      It is significant that many of the leaders of the “new democratic parties” emerging in the Eastern Bloc are Jews. The electorate in Poland, however, has made a stand against the “Zhids”.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
THE REAL REASON FOR COLOURED IMMIGRATION INTO BRITAIN

THE REALITY is that the Gangster Bankers who created and financed Communism also control the ‘British’ Parliament from behind the scenes. The House of Commons is no more than a House of Traitors. For years politicians of all parties have furthered the plans and ambitions of the Money Power, not looked after the interests of the British people. There could be no more clear evidence of this than Coloured Immigration.
      Against the clear wishes of the indigenous British people and in a manner which can only be described as treasonable, an estimated 10 million racially unassimilable aliens have been brought into our already overcrowded island. The incomers include: West Indians, Africans, Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Iranians, Vietnamese, Tamils, Philippinos, Arabs, Egyptians, Indonesians, Malaysians, South and Central Americans, Chinese, Greek and Turkish Cypriots, etc., not to mention vast numbers of ‘nearly-Whites’ from southern Europe. Now we face the prospect of further millions from Hong Kong—and Turkey, if Turkey’s application to join the ‘European’ Common Market is successful. The hostility which these various ethnic groups bear for us, the ‘host’ community, is often only exceeded by the imported ancestral hatreds which they nurture for each other
      Why is this being done to our country? Because the almighty International Bankers—Rothschilds, Warburgs, Rockefellers and their associates have decided that all the peoples of the world are going to have a World Government imposed on them whether they like it or not, and breaking down the identities of the various sovereign nations is best achieved by mixing up their populations. As the pro-World Government spokesman Rabbi Abraham Feinberg put it “One World—One Race: the deliberate encouragement of inter-racial marriage.”
      Britain has been selected by the Bankers to be their first victim nation in the context of the Common Market and other developing World Government structures. To ensure that the planned destruction of our nation is total and permanent the Bankers have determined that our unique Anglo-Saxon-Celtic people must be obliterated as a distinct ethnic group by means of forced race mixing with hordes of Blacks, Browns and Yellows who are being deliberately brought into our country for this purpose

      Eustace Mullins, in his book History of the Jews, quoted a speech by Rabbi Rabinovitch in Budapest forty years ago, which shows clearly what the intentions of the Jewish Bankers are: “Mixing the dark with the white means an end of the White man..... thus the White Race will disappear and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory”.
      The politicians you vote for have been fully co-operating with the Bankers in this strategy. To speed up the process of the destruction and decay of our race and nation and to create room for more new alien immigrants, the British people are being deluged with mass media propaganda to induce them to reduce their numbers by means of abortion, sterilization, vasectomy and contraception. Remember that mass media hacks, like Parliamentary politicians, are simply the obedient servants and handsomely-paid hirelings of the International Jewish Conspiracy.
      Our race and nation is now being destroyed. What are you doing about it? A vote for any of the Parliamentary political parties is a vote of support for the Satanic Bankers and the destruction of your own kind.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

RACE-MIXING IS DEADLIER THAN THE H-BOMB
In his book Deadlier Than The H-Bomb Wing-Commander Leonard Young states that there are only two reasons for Coloured Immigration:
1. To pollute and destroy our race by mongrelization; and
2. To provide degenerate urban mobs which can be used for revolutionary purposes.
      He clearly identified the real driving force behind the plan to destroy Britain when he wrote:
      “The Banking System which was foisted on this country in 1694 and during succeeding years over most of the world has been the main means by which the Jews have brought misery and impoverishment everywhere. By their manipulation of finance they have been the cause of most wars and economic and social troubles. They have been able to obtain control of governments and of the means of publicity (Press, Radio, TV, Films, Publishing Houses, News Services, etc.) and so have been able to suppress the truth and propagate the lie. This has enabled them to fool and bully the people of the world into following the most suicidal courses until the Jews are now in the position of expecting to clamp final dominion upon the world by means of a supranational organisation and some form of irresistible world police force which they would control.”
      If you think we don’t have censorship in Britain, try and buy a copy “from any good bookshop” or borrow one from a public library.
      The United Nations is the prototype for World Government. A prominent Jew—Harold Wallace Rosenthal—wrote in his Confessions:“The U.N. is nothing but a trap door to the Red world’s immense concentration camp ... We [i.e. the Jews] pretty much control the U.N.”
      The U.N. has declared in its numerous conventions that there should be international interbreeding and a uniform world population. Successive British governments have supported these aims by subscribing to The Charter of the United Nations. This foundation document of the U.N. was for the most part drafted by Alger Hiss, top foreign policy adviser to President Roosevelt. Hiss was later convicted of being a key member of a Soviet spy network in America. Apart from Hiss and the man who exposed him, all of the leading members of this network—including the Soviet Embassy officials who managed it—were Jews.
      In 1912 Israel Cohen wrote a book on Communist tactics entitled A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century. It has proven to be prophetic:
      “We must realise that our Party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mould them to our program. The terms ‘colonialism ’ and ‘imperialism ’ must be featured in our propaganda. in America we will aim for subtle victory while inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavour to instil in the Whites a guilt complex for exploiting the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sport and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negroes will be able to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America [and Britain] to our cause.”
      This is why our Banker-controlled TV and advertising industry are working mightily to promote the Negro and why we now have Negroes and Asiatics reading the ‘news’ and entertaining our children. Just how successful has all their propaganda been can be seen throughout Britain by the increasing numbers of Britons rushing to commit racial suicide by cohabiting with the dark races and producing mongrels. Carried to finality this means the permanent and irreversible destruction of Britain and the British people, which is exactly what the Money Lords intend.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

THE RACE LAWS
The Zionist Board of Deputies of British Jews formulated the ‘Race Laws’ which now amend the Public Order Act and various other Statutes. The first Race Relations Bill was introduced into the House of Commons by the Labour Attorney General, the immigrant Russian Jew Sir Frank Soskice in 1965. Draconian amendments to the Race Relations Act of 1976 (which, for example, removed from the Crown the need to prove ‘intent’ in prosecutions for ‘Incitement to Racial Hatred’) was passed in the House of Commons with only 132 of the 635 Members being present. It is well known that numerous M.P.s are privately opposed to the Race Relations law but they were terrified that if they went to the House and spoke up and voted against the amendments they would be ...
1. Smeared in the Jewish-controlled mass media as being “racist”, which might deprive them of the votes of the ever-increasing ‘ethnic minority’ communities and/or
2. Made targets of physical violence by Jewish organised and funded “antiracialist/anti-Fascist” ‘Rentamob’ organisations, and/or
3. Deprived of funding and patronage—personal as well as political—from Jewish sources ...
      ... so on that crucial occasion 80% of our M.P.s hid away in their funk holes. It is thanks to these craven traitors that the Jews are able to make a farce of Parliament and get their way even against the wishes of the vast majority of the British people.

      A subsequent series of amendments to the Act were introduced to the House of Commons in 1986 by the Lithuanian Jew Home Secretary Leon Brittan(isky) now a European Community Commissioner.
      You may wonder why all the various amendments to the Race Relations Act have had such extensive backing from the Home Office. Quite apart from the Jewish Home Secretaries and campaigning by pressure groups such as the Jewish Board of Deputies, there is the crucial factor of the behind-the-scenes influence of Jewish Civil Servants—one in particular being Neville Nagler.
      Throughout the 1970s and 1980s Nagler was the head of the Home Office Department responsible for race relations matters. The Jewish Chronicle has boasted of the influence of this Pinner, Middlesex, Synagogue official. It revealed that whenever a Cabinet Minister made a speech on the subject of race relations, notes for the text were always drafted by Nagler. The J.C. also made it clear that Nagler regularly “liaised” with top officials of the Jewish Board of Deputies. These reports only confirmed anti-Immigration campaigners’ suspicions as to why the Board of Deputies was so well-informed about their activities, personnel and personal circumstances. The Board often betrayed (through its subsidiary organisations and publications, as well as through the boastful columns of the Jewish Chronicle) knowledge which could only have been gained through official (i.e.: Police/Special Branch/M.I.5) facilities. The Home Office, obviously, has right of access to these intelligence data sources.
      Patriots were given further grounds for consternation when it was brayed in the J.C. early in 1991 that Nagler had retired from the Home Office and had been appointed full-time paid Chief Executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews!
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

PLANS FORMULATED YEARS AGO
The plans to promote racial chaos in the Gentile world were laid long ago. In 1850, Karl Marx (real name Moses Mordecai Levy) the son and grandson of Jewish Rabbis, published his Communist Manifesto. In this he advocated the abolition of the family, countries and nationalities together with “all religion” and “all morality”. Who can doubt that this is now literally in process of fulfilment? The evidence is all around us with Coloured Immigration and officially-encouraged mongrelisation. The massive assault on marriage and the family, and morality generally, by the promotion of pornography, explicit sexual videos, sexual licence, a jungle cacophony that passes for ‘music’, and ‘slip-slosh’ ‘daub-and-drivel’ that the gullible are persuaded is ‘art’ ... ad infinitum.
In a letter to Karl Marx published in La Revue de Paris, the Jew Baruch Levy wrote:
      “The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will obtain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and the establishment of a World Republic.”
      This is now all very close to fulfilment. The near complete success of International Jewry’s plan has been made possible by:
1. Their control of Money;
2. Their control of the Media;
3. Their ruthless exercise of the powers which go with Money and Media control to stampede the masses and manipulate key individuals.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

RACE-MIXING: THE LESSON OF HISTORY SUPPRESSED
At the International Court of Justice The Hague on June 23rd 1965, evidence was given relating to the impact of diverse ethnic groups upon each other. At this session Professor Van den Haag of New York University stated unequivocally before the Court that it was a fact of history that unregulated contact between ethnic groups resulted in social disorganisation and an increase in the crime rate. Needless to say, this warning placed before the World Court made the professor extremely unpopular and received little publicity.
      There is in fact clear evidence from history that the mixing of different ethnic groups and alien elements with an established pure-bred population played a part in the decline and eventual fall of all the great empires and civilisations of history, one of the most recent examples being that of Portugal. In the 15th and 16th centuries the Portuguese were a race of navigators, explorers and adventurers. They established colonies in Asia, Africa and South America. As a result, Portugal become one of the wealthiest and most powerful nations in all Europe. However in 1441, after the voyages of discovery down the coast of Africa, the first Black slaves were imported into Portugal and within 100 years ten percent of the population was Black. In the 1911 edition of The Encyclopaedia Britannica—before the Jewish distorters of history had really intervened—is the following entry: “The Portuguese inter-married freely with their slaves and this infusion of alien blood profoundly modified the character and physique of the nation. It may be said without exaggeration that the Portuguese of the 17th and later centuries were two different races”.
      The Portugal of today is backward and impoverished; it is a living testimony to what happens to a White country when its population is decimated by Blacks. This crucial due to an understanding of Portuguese history has been blotted out of all modern history books. No modern encyclopaedia or history book mentions the impact of race-mixing on the nation of Portugal. History is not only being distorted, it is being obliterated in order to hide from us the consequences of Coloured Immigration.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

“MAKE RACISM A DIRTY WORD!”
Our ancestors fought and died to keep the Spanish, the French and the Germans out when they tried to invade our island home. But the present generation of Britons have been cowed into silence and inaction while the biggest invasion in our history is taking place. If our ancestors were to return they would consider us all mad or stupid—or traitors. Half the world would like to come to Britain, not just the 3,250,000 Chinese in Hong Kong who are poised to flood in. It is about time that our contemptible bunch of politicians started to put the British first in their own country. By using propaganda smear words like ‘Racist’ and ‘Fascist’, the Banker-controlled media have brainwashed the British into remaining passive and impotent while their race is destroyed and their country is stolen from them.
      In 1922, the Bolshevik leader Selenkov stated in Moscow: “We must create a climate of anti-nationalism and anti-racialism amongst Whites. We must reduce patriotism and pride of race to meaningless abstractions and make racialism a dirty word”. How successful that plan has been!
      The British now shrink in fear of being called a ‘racist’. It is worse than being called a thief. Yet ‘racism’ is no more than another word for patriotism—a righteous cause for which millions have died. To put one’s own kind first is a virtue not a crime. It is the greatest of crimes to help an enemy destroy one’s own race and nation, and the Mega-Bankers are the greatest enemies of the British nation in all history.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

IMMIGRATION AND THE SLAVE TRADE: THE JEWISH CONNECTION
By way of a postscript to our analysis of the way in which Jewry has sought to encourage race-mixing among Gentile peoples (while jealously asserting its right to defend itself against “assimilation” with any kind of non-Jew—White, Black, Brown or Yellow) we draw readers’ attention to the book Who Brought the Slaves To America?, published by The Sons of Liberty in the USA.
      This work is based on authentic contemporary records available in the Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. They show that it was overwhelmingly Jewish merchants and ship owners who introduced the Negro to America. The book urges us to remember these figures: “Approximately one hundred and ten million Black people were captured and removed from their homelands in Africa. Only eleven million of these Black slaves reached the Colonies alive”. It is time that the Negro people knew the truth about the obnoxious slave trade.
      It is ironic that as part of their continual brainwashing campaign to promote race-mixing (among non-Jews) Jewish film and television moguls work overtime to give Negroes a sense of grievance and White people a sense of guilt by depicting White Gentiles as being responsible for the slave trade when in fact, as the historical records show, this vile business was operated by Jewish get-rich-quick artists.
      This small illustration of what Jews of yester-year actually did and how the Jews who control the information media today manufacture lies to distort the historical record, should prompt even the most craven Gentile opponent of ‘anti-Semitism’ to ask their Jewish friends a few direct questions about the game Jewry is playing in the field of race relations. In the likely event that their questions are met with abuse and threats of prosecution under the Race Relations Act, we suggest they turn for a due to Jewish strategy to George Orwell’s book about a future tyrannous world super-state Nineteen-Eighty-Four: “He who controls the Present, controls the Past; he who controls the Past controls the Future”.
      The Jewish media debauches the historical record in order to manipulate our emotions and values and thereby warp our political judgement so that we can be made to accept willingly decisions which serve the interests of Jewry even when injurious to our own best interests.

 
      We will explore this aspect of the Jewish propaganda war against the Gentile mind when we come to a later chapter dealing with the gigantic lie known as ‘The Holocaust’.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
THE MEDIA: AN INSTRUMENT OF THE BANKERS

OBVIOUSLY the people who have the power to create limitless amounts of money out of nothing and lend it out as stated, control nations and governments, education, the media, secret societies, the churches—in fact, everything of any consequence in the land. Their control of the media is almost total. They view the people as “stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them whether it be truth or lies” and “horses asses” whose opinion they shape and fashion. (Source: Confessions of Harold Wallace Rosenthal).
      When you buy a newspaper or pay for your TV licence you are paying for the privilege of being lied-to, conned, brainwashed and deceived; kept occupied with masses of trivia that conceals much subversive material.
      Former foreign correspondent of The Times, Douglas Reed, stated in his book The Controversy of Zion: “Opinion today is a manufactured product and can be produced in any form desired” and “The newspapers are under occult control” [i.e. under Zionist control]. The newspapers and all the rest of our mass communications media are in the pocket and firmly under the control of a few super-rich Jewish billionaires like Edgar Bronfman, Robert Maxwell, Harry Oppenheimer, Armand Hammer and the Rothschild family. Under the direction of these people journalism has be come an ever more disreputable business for professional propagandists and paid liars. A few years ago this fact was stated by one of their own number. At a retirement banquet given in his honour, the Managing Editor of the New York Times, John Swinton, declared:
      “If any one of you dared to write the truth he would soon find himself on the street looking for a new job. The major function of a New York [or Fleet Street] journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie openly, to crawl at the feet of Mammon and sell his race and his country for his dally bread. We are the tools and puppets of rich men who stay behind the scenes; we are jumping jacks. They pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our resources, our very lives, belong to other men. We are spiritual prostitutes.”
      Professor Arthur Butz (head of the Engineering faculty at North-Western University, USA, and author of Hoax of the 20th Century, a devastating exposé of the Zionist ‘Holocaust’ fraud) put the position rather more concisely: “The media is exposed as constituting a lie machine of vaster extent than many of the more independently-minded have perceived.”
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
‘ANTI-SEMITISM’ CAUSED BY JEWISH ANTI-GENTILISM

FEW Gentiles realise that today’s world ‘Jewish’ community is divided into two quite distinct racial strains. The majority (about 80%) are known as “Ashkenazim” or “East European” Jews. They are not the descendants of the 12 Jewish tribes of the Bible, but the descendants of a Turco-Mongoloid people who formed an empire in the area between eastern Turkey and southern Russia called The Empire of the Khazars. This empire flourished after the Roman Empire had crumbled and as the two great religions of Christianity and Mohommedanism were seeking converts (mainly by military conquest). The Khazar empire was trapped between these two religious power blocks. The Khazar emperor, wishing to maintain the independence of his domain, decided that he and his entire people should adopt a religious ‘third way’ and become converted to Judaism. At that time Jews of ‘the Twelve Tribes’ had mostly been scattered from the Holy Land and were weak. A part of the remnant found itself in the land of the Khazars, regarded the Khazar emperor’s decision as a bit of a windfall and happily obliged him with the mass conversion process. The bulk of the ‘authentic’ Jews did not go northwards from Palestine but westwards along the coast of North Africa and from there they entered Spain. This minority strain of today’s Jewry are called “Sephardim”, or “Spanish and Portuguese” Jews. The history of the Khazar conversion to Judaism is given in the book The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler, the well-known Jewish author and student of mysticism. The Zionists are, of course, much embarrassed by Koestler’s findings, because it means that their claim that “all Jews have a right to return to the land of their ancestors” can only be advanced by the Sephardim (and then only tentatively). The claim of the 80% Ashkenazim ‘Jewish’ majority is entirely bogus.
      Christians are stultified in their attitude to Jewry because they believe that Jesus Christ was a Jew and that Christianity came out of Judaism. Both of these beliefs, although now well established, are lies. Jesus Christ was not a Jew. He was a direct descendant of Judah, the son of Jacob, which the Ashkenazim (Khazar) Jews have never been. Jesus was a Galilean as were all of his disciples, except Judas who was an Edomite Jew. It was the Jewish Pharisees and Sadducees who were Christ’s bitterest opponents and finally had him crucified. Christ himself uttered the most scathing denunciations and rebukes against the Jews which today would certainly land him in the dock under our Jewish imposed Race Relations laws.
      Christ called the Jews “a generation of vipers” (Matt. 23:33). According to the eminent Biblical scholar Scofield, in his Reference Bible, the word translated “generation” in the New Testament of the Bible means “race”. Christ also seemed to hold the Jews responsible for all the innocent blood shed from the beginning of history (Matt. 23:25). The Jews, in fact, use the serpent as the symbol of their tribe and have stated that when the serpent entwines the globe they will rule the world
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

TALMUDIC BLASPHEMIES
With references human excrement and semen, what The Talmud teaches about Jesus Christ is unprintable. The Talmud, in fact, contains the most terrible blasphemies against Christ and incitements to hatred against Christians ever written. The hatred against Christ, Christianity, Christians and, in fact, all non-Jews (‘Goyim’) which is inculcated into many Jewish hearts and minds through the vile contents of The Talmud spills out into all kinds of cultural media—not least films. Jews have been in control of the film business, particularly Hollywood, since the very beginning of this medium. This stranglehold is re-enforced by the total Jewish domination of the major ‘coast-to-coast’ television networks in the United States. In fact, Jews dominate the films/TV media throughout most of the rest of the West. A recent example of Talmud-inspired hatred was the film The Last Temptation of Christ in which Christ is depicted as “a lunatic, a bungler ... a mental case who falls down in fits”.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

“FUNDAMENTALLY, JUDAISM IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN”—The Jewish World, March 1923
The Jewish film producer and script writer Ben Hecht, in his book A Jew in Love expressed the Jewish hatred for Christ as follows:
      “One of the finest things ever done by the mob was the crucifixion of Christ; intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle. If I’d been in charge of executing Christ I’d have handled it differently. You see what I’d have done was to have him shipped to Rome and fed to the lions. They never could have made a saviour out of mince meat.”
      Can you imagine it being remotely possible for anybody to remain a top scriptwriter in Hollywood—or at the BBC TV here in Britain—who expressed similar opinions about Moses, or any notable character in Jewish history?
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

‘THE JEWS AND THEIR LIES’
The Talmud, is the guide to the practical performance of Judaism. It is in fact many books, a compilation of the sayings of Jewish “sages” down the years. It teaches that all non-Jews are beasts of burden created to serve Jews; that all the property of the ‘Goyim’ [a word translated by Jews in works written for the benefit of Gentiles as meaning simply ‘non-Jews’ but which in fact correctly translates as ‘cattle’] rightfully belongs to the Jews. This is stated quite openly in, for example, Choszen Hamiszpat 388 of the Schulchan Aruch,which is a kind of résumé of the very much longer complete Talmud (29 volumes plus index in the Soncino English-language translation).
      Martin Luther, (1483-1546) one of the key figures of the Reformation, a scholar of Hebrew and Aramaic, was one of the first to expose the evil contained in The Talmud. He did this in his last work entitled The Jews and Their Lies which in essence argued that the root cause of Gentile ‘anti-Semitism’ is Jewish anti-Gentilism.
      The Talmud justifies and encourages every possible kind of depraved act—including acts of sexual intercourse with infants—to say nothing of murder, theft and perjury—providing that such acts are carried out against ‘the Goyim’, to whom the Jewish ‘sages’ concede the status of bipeds, but not fellow human beings. Numerous scholars since Martin Luther have exposed the vileness of The Talmud, such as Father I.B. Praniatis, a Lithuanian Roman Catholic Professor of Theology and Hebrew at St. Petersburg, Russia, during the 1890s whose book The Talmud Unmasked obtained an official Roman Catholic Church Imprimatur. (An English-language version of this book is available from: The Noontide Press, Suite 183, 1822½ Newport Blvd., Costa Mesa, California 92627, USA)
      Benjamin Freedman, himself a Jew, included in his book Facts Are Facts a summary of the blatant and incorrigibly evil anti-Gentile teachings of The Talmud. He wrote:
      “From the birth of Jesus until this day there never have been recorded more vicious and vile blasphemies of Jesus, of Christians and the Christian faith by anyone, anywhere or anytime that you will find between the covers of the infamous 63 books which are the legal code which forms the basis of Jewish religious law ... You will have to excuse the foul, obscene, indecent, lewd and vile language you will see from the official unabridged translation of The Talmud into English.”
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]


ORGANISED EVIL
In the 1920s Henry Ford, demonstrated that Jews were behind much of the organised evil in America. His articles on the subject were originally published in his newspaper The Dearborn Independent, and later reprinted and expanded in his famous book The International Jew. The learned historian Nesta Webster, writing at about the same time as Ford, showed that much the same situation prevailed in Europe. Her book Secret Societies and Subversive Movements is of particular interest. Her researches constitute the starting point of the next chapter
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
MASONIC SECRET SOCIETIES ARE CONTROLLED BY JEWRY

IN THE days before Britain’s security services were thoroughly penetrated by Communists, liberal internationalists and members of the Rothschild family, the historian Nesta Webster was often invited to give lectures to members of the Secret Service on the origins of world unrest and subversion. She traced the origins of the network of the Communist international subversion to their Jewish sources. She was familiar with much of the research material which we have published in our earlier chapter entitled ‘Communism is Jewish’. Through her researches she was able to link the intellectual origins and techniques of subversion employed by the Communist International with the world of Masonic Secret Societies.
      Indeed, she was able to show that both movements, at heart, were Jewish in inspiration and key personnel. When the core objectives of each movement are considered together with their Jewish intellectual inspiration it can be seen that they are essentially the same movement: a movement of Jewish revolt against Christian European Civilisation.
      Nesta Webster was quite frank about the Jewish connection. She declared that another secret society existed within Freemasonry “for which the visible organisation of the latter serves merely as a cover”. She identified the hidden controlling group within Freemasonry as “The Jewish Power”.
      The Protocols of Zion state: “It is this which has served as the basis for our organisation of secret masonry which is not known to, and aims which are not even so much as suspected by, these Goy cattle, attracted by us into the ‘Show’ army of Masonic Lodges in order to throw dust into the eyes of their fellows” ... “Masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects”.
      The Protocols speak with scathing contempt for Masons; they are simply the stupid “Goy cattle” in complete ignorance of its real aims and who exactly forms the controlling hierarchy. Freemasons are gullible pawns and dupes who have been enlisted in the service of International Jewry to further their secret aims and objectives. As demonstrated in this booklet, foremost is Satanic World Government and the destruction of all Gentile races and nations, and particularly the destruction of White European races and nations. Put succinctly, Freemasons are busily engaged in working for their own destruction.
      According to some estimates, one in fifty British males is a Freemason. Many prominent people in politics, the civil service, the judiciary, financial institutions, education, etc., are Masons. The police service throughout the United Kingdom is especially noted for being dominated by Masonry.
      Writing of the “Judeo-Masonic” control behind the drive towards World Government, Admiral Sir Barry Domville stated in From Admiral to Cabin Boy: It is a tragedy that the British people have been so ill-informed on this crucial matter and so careless in the way that they have been governed, as to permit this secret Junta to gain control over their affairs. The Jews form only a small minority in each country and would be unable to ensure the execution of their policy unless they could obtain the collaboration of persons in the government service. Obviously this could not be done openly, or the whole plan would be exposed and exploded. They must therefore build up some secret organisation and what could be better than the one already in hand [Masonry] in which Jews figure so prominently. That is the simple explanation, and it only became necessary to try and establish chosen men in key positions in the government offices, and in organisations like the police, to put the machine in working order”.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

PLANNED CHAOS
Commander Guy Carr—a life-long student of secret societies—was convinced that Freemasonry was controlled “at the top” by a Masonic sect known as The Illuminati. In his book Pawns in the Game he revealed that The Illuminati is an élite secret society founded by a Jew, Professor Adam Weishaupt, in 1776. The name of the sect is a reference to the Devil—“Lucifer, the angel of light” to Satanists. The Illuminati devised a plan to destroy Western Civilisation and literally to implement the programme of Satan on Earth in opposition to God. It never worked for immediate success, all its plans were long-term. Founder members included a number of Jewish bankers: Itzig, Friedlander and Meyer Amshel, founder of the Rothschild dynasty. Commander Guy Carr believed that The Illuminati has been behind all the troubles, misery and carnage of the past two centuries, including all the revolutions, wars and depressions and is, today, the driving power behind the mixing of races.
      In a remarkable work published by John Robison, M.A., in 1789 entitled Proofs Of A Conspiracy Against All Religions And Governments Of Europe is the following statement by the Abbé Baruel concerning The Illuminati: “In the desires of a terrible and formidable sect, you have only reached the first stages of the plans it has formed for that general revolution which is to overthrow all thrones, all altars, annihilate all property, efface all laws and end up by dissolving all society”.
      The Protocols contain the outline or draft of the plan of action to destroy Christian civilisation and establish a One World Dictatorship controlled by Jews. The principles and policies of The Protocols are not new. The same morality of “limitless ambitions, burning greediness, merciless vengeance, hatreds and malice” is to be found in The Talmud. This is the motivation which has driven Jews throughout the centuries.
      In 1492, Chemor, Chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin in Constantinople for advice when the expulsion of Jews from Spain was pending. The reply of the Sanhedrin is to be found in the 16th century book La Silva Curiosa by Julio Iniguez de Medrano. A photostat copy of the original and a translation are to be found in the edition of The Protocols published in the United States by The Sons of Liberty. The text of the reply is as follows:
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

“BELOVED BRETHREN OF MOSES...
“Beloved Brethren in Moses:
      We have received your letter in which you tell us of your anxieties and misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by a great pain to hear it as yourselves.
      The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following:
1. As for what you say that the King of Spain obliges you to become Christians: do it, since you cannot do otherwise.
2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the Christians of theirs.
3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take away Christians’ lives.
4. As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches.
5. As for the many other vexations you complain of arrange for your sons to become advocates and lawyers and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.
6. Do not swerve from this order we give you, because you will find by experience that humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.
[Signed] The Prince of the Jews of Constantinople.”
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
DELIBERATELY CONTRIVED WARS

LONG ago, Clausewitz, a student of war and exponent of military tactics, wrote: “Modern wars are the pursuit of policy by other means, that is to say that wars are prime fights between the populations of ‘A’ and ‘B’ for the benefit of ‘C’.”
      In 1905, Lenin [Ulyanov] wrote in The Two Tactics of Social Democracy: “Ally yourselves with one of your enemies against another, and destroy them one by one.” This has always been the policy of Jews.
      George Knupffer wrote: “It is not difficult to see that precisely this technique is being used by the Soviets also in international relations. It is in this light that we must see the Red alliance with the Nazis and then the West in the Second World War.”
      In 1952 Rabbi Rabinovitch addressed a conference of European Rabbis in Bucharest behind closed doors—but his speech was leaked:
      “... Our increasing numbers in certain vital areas is arousing opposition to us, and we must now work with every means at our disposal to precipitate World War Three.. the Third World War will surpass in destruction all previous contests. Israel, of course, will remain neutral, and when both sides are devastated and exhausted we will arbitrate, sending our Control Commissions into all the wrecked countries. This war will end for all time our struggle against the Gentiles”
      The full text of this speech was published in the periodical Canadian Intelligence Service in September 1952, and at about the same time in the American publication Common Sense.
      In Le Contemporair, July 1st 1860, Rabbi Reichorn wrote: “We shall drive the Christians into wars by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving place to our people”.
      Colonel A.H. Lane wrote in his privately-published [1938] book The Hidden Hand: “In order to bring about Jewish World Domination it is necessary from time to time to engender wars so that the most virile and patriotic men are killed or crippled physically or mentally”.
      Clemanceau, French leader during the First World War, arrived at exactly the same conclusion. In a little book entitled A Pied Sinai he wrote: “The Semitic race has a programme for the extermination of other races and the peopling of the whole earth with their own blood. Their zeal for this cause is such that in comparison with this, nothing else matters at all. To this cause no sacrifice is too great, no suffering too terrible”.
      Kurt Kerlen, a spokesman for General Ludendorff, commander of the German Army in the First World War, wrote of “the skill” by which Jewry is able to divide white nations so that they cut each others’ throats for Jewry’s gain. (He was quoted in Nesta Webster’s book Boche and Bolshevik).
      In his book The Hidden Tyranny Benjamin Freedman claimed that the Jews prevented the First World War from ending in 1916 when a German peace offer was on the table at the British War Cabinet and needed only one signature to end the carnage: “Great Britain would have quickly accepted Germany’s October 1916 peace offer if the World Zionist Organisation had not interfered. The British War Cabinet was then taking their instructions from Talmudist Jews in London”.
      Numerous Jewish sources have admitted that they were behind the two World Wars. The Jewish World of London, dated 16th January 1919 declared: “International Judaism forced Europe into war, not only to seize a large part of the gold (paid out in armaments and their seizing of the gold bullion in Russia), but to start a new ‘Jewish World’ with the help of this gold”.
      A prominent London Jew, Dr. Oscar Levy, wrote: “We Jews, who have posed as Saviours of the World, are today nothing but the World’s seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners”. Dr. Levy wrote the preface to a book by George Pitt-Rivers (1920) entitled The World Significance of the Russian Revolution.
      Henry Ford wrote in his book The International Jew: “I studied the causes of war and I am convinced that nearly all wars were caused so that someone would profit, and those who profited and those who are profiting now are the international financiers, the Jews. ... Two very prominent Jews began telling me about the power of the Jewish race, how they controlled the world through gold, and that the Jew and no-one but the Jew could stop the war. [WW1] They went into details to tell me the means by which the Jews controlled the war... how they had the money, how they cornered all the basic materials needed to fight the war and all that, and they talked so long and so well that they convinced me. They said that the Jews had started the war and would continue it as long as they wished, and until they stopped the war it would not be stopped. ... Gather together the fifty most wealthy Jewish financiers, the men who create wars for their own profit, control them, and you will put an end to it all.”
      The fratricidal wars of this century, coloured immigration, the erosion standards and values, the promotion of perversion and degeneracy in all its forms, the corruption and debasement of music, art and literature is all part of the same programme: The annihilation of the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic people of Britain, the incorporation of the British nation into a One World Government controlled by the very people behind all the mischief and carnage of the 20th century.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

THE REAL IRAQI CONFLICT
If anything demonstrated the Jews’ ability to get Gentiles fighting wars to serve Jewish power, it was the mobilisation of almost all the member nations of the United Nations Organisation to pursue firstly sanctions and then all-out war against Iraq on the pretext that Iraq had invaded its neighbour, the Kingdom of Kuwait.
      For centuries Kuwait was a part of Iraq during the Turkish Ottoman Empire. Kuwait was created by British administrators after the First World War. Arbitrary ‘border’ lines were drawn over the map of the Middle East probably with a school ruler. The most powerful families who had served Britain well during the war were rewarded with ‘kingdoms’.
      The artificial Kingdom of Kuwait was fortunately positioned over a huge lake of oil. Iraq had long campaigned for Arab oil-producing nations to ration their production and sale of oil to world markets in order to maintain a high price for this commodity, which in due course will run out. Iraq also wanted the Arab nations to use oil production as a lever to compel the West to deal more fairly with the Arab world in general and with the Palestinians in particular.
      For decades, representatives of Arab oil-producing nations would meet under the auspices of their co-ordinating body OPEC to thrash out an agreed production quota for each nation and an agreed price. Within weeks, sometimes hours, of such agreements, smaller members of the body, notably little kingdoms such as Kuwait (ruled by a single family or clan who treat the country as if it were their own private corporation) would disregard the quota and price agreements and sell as much as they could for whatever price they could get.
      As often as not, the main reason for this irresponsibility was the need for more ready cash to squander in the casinos and night clubs of the West and to maintain lifestyles of unimaginable luxury as and when they happened to return home. Kuwait did not need to behave in such a manner as its investments around the world were producing more income than their oil production—but the greed of former goat-herders-turned-billionaires knows no bounds.
      The exasperation of Iraq finally boiled over when the Iraqis discovered that the Kuwaitis were not only pumping out their own oil at a rate in contravention of OPEC agreements, they were also pumping Iraqi reserves from under their mutual border. This was the immediate cause of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
      Saddam Hussein, leader of Iraq, had no reason to suppose that the world would be mobilised against him. Over the previous couple of decades both the West and the Soviet Union had supplied him with armaments. Britain and America had sided with him in his war against Iran when that nation was believed to be the greatest threat to the West and Zionism. But with Iran exhausted by war and with a new and slightly less fanatical Muslim fundamentalist leadership, Iraq became the biggest single threat to the West and to Israel.
      The West wants as much oil as it can get as cheaply as possible. It does not want Saddam Hussein imposing a production and price discipline on the Arab world The Zionists did not want Iraq to galvanise the previously disunited and chaotic Arab nations into putting Up a united front against Israel and using oil as a weapon to force the West to give justice to the Palestinian people.
      So the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait was made the excuse for mobilising the world to “defend poor little Kuwait”...“to uphold democratic standards”, etc., etc. All this, of course, was sheerest hypocrisy.
      The ‘World Community’ did not rise up and impose sanctions and then declare war on Israel when Israel invaded the Lebanon. ‘The World Community’ is still doing nothing about the Chinese invasion of Tibet and the extermination of the peaceful Tibetan people. The West still supports the genocidal Khmer Rouge terrorist force in Cambodia despite its monstrous record of genocide.
      It must surely be obvious to all that the ‘World Community’ was not mobilised against Iraq for the sake of “Kuwait’s freedom, democracy, civilised standards of international diplomacy” and other such propaganda objectives, but to crush Iraq as a threat to the Jewish-dominated international oil cartels and, above all, as a threat to Israel. (Military force—though on nothing like such a huge scale—was employed by America against General Gadaffi’s Libya in 1985 for precisely the same reasons).
      Those who doubt the truth of this analysis of why Iraq was crushed might care to ponder the reported words of President Mitterand of France: “I assure you France won’t go to war in an American car driven by Israel”.
      It must be noted that the war against Iraq is now being used as a precedent for further ‘Police actions’ under the ‘authority’ of the United Nations. World Government tyranny is a few steps nearer, its way being prepared by President Bush’s “New World Order”. Nations who appear to threaten Jewish International Financial interests and/or the State of Israel can expect to find themselves bombed to smithereens. The Jewish controlled mass media will, of course, be relied upon to justify all such actions as being “in British interests” (or in France, “in French interests”; in the United States, “in America’s interests” ... etc., etc.) and to whip up the ignorant Goyim into paroxysms of flag-wagging ‘patriotism’.
      How the Elders of Zion must laugh at us!
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
THE TRUTH REVERSED IN ‘HOLOCAUST’ HOAX

WINSTON Churchill identified Jewish leaders as the driving power behind Communism in an article entitled “Zionism versus Bolshevism: the Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”, published in The Illustrated Sunday Herald, London, in 1920.
      As we have seen, the Jewish leaders of Communism have been behind the torture and deaths of hundreds of millions of anti-Communist and Christian people. Yet because of the unremitting outpouring of Jewish propaganda from the Jewish-controlled press and broadcasting media, the average person in the West, if asked to name the worst atrocity of the 20th Century would, in a preconditioned reaction reminiscent of a Pavlovian dog, declare: “The Holocaust—the systematic extermination of 6,000,000 Jews in the gas chambers of German Nazi concentration camps during the Second World War”.
      While it cannot be denied that there were massacres of Jews by German Nazis and their allies during WW2 (often in revenge for the ghastly activities of Jewish-led Communist secret police—then known as the N.K.V.D. or the ‘Chekists’) the total of such Jewish deaths can be computed in the hundreds of thousands, not millions as claimed in the ‘Holocaust’ legend.
      The news film of emaciated Jews in newly-liberated German concentration camps like Belsen and Dachau, though horrific to see, are not evidence of “systematic extermination”... but of famine and typhus—phenomena which affected the whole of Germany and other parts of Europe at the end of the war, due to the massive extent of Allied bombing. More than two million German civilians died of famine and typhus during the years 1944-1947. That figure does not include the number of German civilians killed by bombing. As many as 300,000 civilians died in just three nights in the 1944 raid on Dresden, a non-military target crammed with refugees fleeing from the Russians.
      Those who have studied ‘Holocaust’ propaganda over the years have long realised that the Jews (of both the Communist and Zionist variety) have grotesquely exaggerated—and in many cases invented—stories of Jewish suffering and ‘extermination’. One need only examine pre-war Jewish sources on world Jewish population totals, and compare those figures with post-war world Jewish population totals, to realise that world Jewry could not possibly have maintained, indeed slightly increased, its total population during the Second World War and also have lost 6,000,000 in the ‘Holocaust’.
      Those who promote the ‘Holocaust’ legend point to the relatively small post-war Jewish populations of Germany, Austria, Hungary and other parts of Europe compared with the pre-war Jewish population figures. In fact, of course, before the war started hundreds of thousands of Jews left central and western Europe for the United States, Britain, Canada and South America; millions of Jews left eastern parts of Europe for the Soviet Union, where huge numbers were located east of the Urals for the duration of the war.
      The Zionists used (and still use) the ‘Holocaust’ horror stories to bounce the world into accepting their conquest of the land of Palestine after WW2, and other Arab territory since then. They also use the ‘Holocaust’ as a way of raising vast sums of money: ‘reparations’ from Germany; gifts from soft-hearted and gullible Gentiles elsewhere.
      The Communist Jews play up the ‘Holocaust’ story because they hope to distract world attention from the true horrors perpetrated by them in the Gulags of Siberia to false tales of German Nazi “Death Camps”.
      Bit by bit the Jewish ‘Holocaust’ story has become increasingly threadbare as various “eye-witness accounts” and items of “evidence” became subject to critical and intelligent examination by independent-minded historians and scholars in a variety of other academic disciplines. The following examples illustrate this point:
Firstly, many people think that the concentration camp at Dachau, Germany, was one of the legendary “Death Camps”, which operated the gas chamber system for the “systematic extermination of Jewish inmates”. Immediately on the capture of Dachau by American troops photographs were shown of the door of one such “gas chamber”. Senior German officers who had been in charge of the camp were put on trial, convicted and hanged for “mass murder” by use of “gas chambers”. Years later it was admitted that the only gas chamber that existed at Dachau was a small airtight room used for delousing clothes by means of hydro-cyanic acid gas. (This method of eliminating typhus-carrying lice was common throughout Europe at the time.) This was the facility which was depicted in earlier propaganda photographs as being the “gas chamber” used for the “mass murder of Jews”—a crime which did not happen, but for which innocent men were hanged by Allied War Crimes Tribunals! Even Greville Janner, Q.C., M.P., admitted in the House of Commons ten years ago, when he was Chairman of the Board of Deputies of British Jews: “... as everybody knows, there were no gas chambers in Dachau...”
      Secondly, many people will recollect seeing photographs of a medical kidney dish with white lumps in it which were described as “human soap”. This was an official exhibit at the Nuremberg War Crimes trials designed to prove that the Nazis melted down the corpses of their Jewish victims to make soap. Since then it has been admitted, even by Jewish ‘Holocaust’ study centres, that no such “human soap” ever existed and that this ludicrous Soviet exhibit (the authenticity of which went unchallenged by any of the Allied judges and prosecutors) was a propaganda hoax.
      Much the same process happened after the First World War when horror stories about “The Kaiser’s Tinned Human Flesh Factory” and “German troops riding into Belgium with babies impaled on their lances”, etc., were disproved, formally withdrawn and apologised for by the British Government in 1925!
      No such apology would seem to be in prospect in respect of the Second World War ‘Holocaust’ horror stories, even though 45 years have elapsed, because international Jewry is deriving such incredible benefits, political and financial, from instilling into the Gentile peoples of the world a massive guilt complex about the ‘Holocaust’. Jewry is well able to cow and brainwash large sections of the world’s population because, through their control of the world banking system, they have been able to achieve a virtual monopoly control of the international mass media: press, television, films, book publishing, theatre, etc. They use that media monopoly relentlessly to keep alive the ‘Holocaust’ legend in the minds of gullible brainwashed Gentiles, and, thereby, licence themselves to perpetrate all manner of crimes, from squalid financial frauds [e.g. the Guinness scandal in Britain], to treason and subversion [e.g. the Pollard spy scandal in America], to international terrorism and genocidal warfare [e.g. the Israeli invasion of the Lebanon and occupation of the West Bank].
      It is because Jewry needs to have the propaganda weapon of the ‘Holocaust’ legend that it not only keeps on pumping out propaganda extravaganzas on the television but also bullies the politicians of nations throughout the world to mount “War Crimes Trials” against elderly men who served with the German forces during the last war, and who since the war have tried to build new lives for themselves in Britain, the USA, Canada, Australia, etc. Britain’s legal system has recently [April 1991] been corrupted by the House of Commons (with stout resistance from the House of Lords) solely as a result of Jewish pressure to legislate retrospectively so that show-trials can be mounted which would serve as a focus for the Jewish owned media to pump out yet more propaganda lies.
      But the Jews do not have everything entirely their own way. Apart from the very brave resistance to the Jewish ‘War Crimes Trials’ lobby by many members of the House of Lords, there has also been the recent appearance of an item of research entitled The Leuchter Report which has severely rattled the Jewish ‘Holocaust’ industry.
      About six years ago Jewish lobbyists in Canada persuaded the authorities to prosecute a German-Canadian, Ernst Zuendel, for distributing the international best-seller Did Six Million Really Die? by Richard Harwood. Charges were laid against Zuendel under the terms of a law which prohibits “Spreading False Rumours”. This law was enacted during the First World War (!) as a measure to hide from the civilian population the full extent of the horrors taking place at the battle front.
      Zuendel was convicted at the first trial and on Appeal, the trial judge was held to be so biased against the Defendant that a new trial was ordered.
      The key Defence witness at the second trial was Fred Leuchter, head of the American engineering firm Fred Leuchter Associates. This firm has America’s—and therefore probably the world’s—leading specialists in the design, construction and maintenance of execution gas chambers. Until recently, when American Jewish lobbyists intervened to try to destroy the firm, Fred Leuchter Associates had contracts of many years’ standing with several States of the United States which still execute criminals convicted of capital crimes, in gas chambers. Mr. Leuchter and his firm have no political background or involvements whatsoever.
      Prior to Zuendel’s second trial, Leuchter and a team of his firm’s employees went to various of the so-called “Death Camps”—Auschwitz, Treblinka, etc., in order to examine the “gas chambers” and crematoria facilities to see if they were capable of executing and disposing of the remains of millions of people on the kind of factory ‘mass-production’ basis claimed by the ‘Holocaust’ propagandists.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

MASS EXTERMINATION BY GAS CHAMBERS—HOW THE JEWS SAY IT WAS DONE
At this point it might be well to refresh our memories of what the promoters of the ‘Holocaust’ legend claim, for it is only when we bear in mind the essential details of their account that we can appreciate the enormous importance of Leuchter’s evidence:
      They claim that many hundreds of Jews [and others—but mostly Jews] were crammed naked into gas chambers. Once inside and the door shut, a quantity of Zyklon B [chalk pellets containing hydrocyanic acid which give off lethal cyanide gas when exposed to the air] was tipped inside through a roof hatch. After an hour or so the door of the gas chamber would be opened and the bodies dragged out. The mouths of the corpses were immediately searched for gold fillings and extractions performed. Other orifices were also searched for hidden valuables. This work was carried out by camp inmates under the immediate supervision of their SS guards. Neither the inmates nor the SS men wore any breathing apparatus or any other kind of protective clothing; indeed, the guards often callously smoked and ate during the gruesome process. Thereafter, the corpses would be sent to the crematoria where they would be reduced to ashes in conventional coke-fired cremation ovens. On days that the ovens were too busy to cope with the workload, pits would be dug, corpses thrown in and incinerated. This process continued 24-hours a day for a period of years. In the case of Birkenau, in the Auschwitz complex
of camps, this ‘mass production’ method was supposed to have sustained an extermination/incineration rate of 1,000 an hour—24,000 a day.

      Even before we turn to the detail of Leuchter’s evidence to the Canadian Court, the preposterous impudence of the Jewish ‘Holocaust’ story must be self-evident to those who can perform a little simple arithmetic: If Birkenau-Auschwitz exterminated 1,000 Jews an hour for a year that would result in 8,760,000 Jewish dead. [1,000 x 24 x 365]. As that “death factory” was supposed to be functional for about four years, we arrive at a figure of 35,040,000! Suppose we allow for just a little Levantine exaggeration, and cut the projected Birkenau-Auschwitz figure by 75%, that still leaves a total of 8,760,000. That number is nearly half the claimed Jewish population of the entire world in 1938! And let us not forget that gas chambers at other “Death Camps”—Treblinka, Chelmno, Sobibor, etc., were also supposed to have accounted for “millions” of Jews.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

WHAT FRED LEUCHTER’S EVIDENCE REVEALED
Fred Leuchter explained to the Court that the technology of execution gas chambers employing cyanide gas had been fully developed in the United States by the early 1920s. Literature concerning this technology circulated the globe thereafter and all of the relevant technical information would have been available to the Germans. In particular, they would have been aware:
    A. That cyanide gas is so dangerous that if it is not to injure or kill those operating the gas chamber as well as the condemned person, the chamber must be specially constructed to be airtight and, specifically, the entry door must be gasketted.
    B. Cyanide gas is persistent, that is, it clings in corners and holes—and in hair, in body folds and orifices for many hours after it has been released. Hence, after the condemned person has died it is necessary to have a ventilation system which can expel as much of the gas as possible from the chamber to a height where the gas can diffuse in the air without posing any danger to persons in the vicinity. In the interests of safety, the body should be left in the ventilated chamber for 24 hours before the gasketted door is opened. Only staff wearing breathing apparatus and protective clothing should be in the room in which the gas chamber is situated when the door is opened. Thereafter, staff should hose down the body and the entire chamber to disperse the final, potentially fatal, traces of the gas.
    C. Cyanide gas had been used by the German and French armies in WW1 to delouse buildings and clothing. Both armies would post armed guards around—but a good distance away from—the building being used for this purpose. After 24 hours troops wearing breathing apparatus would open the doors and windows of the building, but retreat to a safe distance for a ventilation period of not less than 24 hours. Thereafter clothing, blankets, carpets, etc., from the building would be put on lines and beaten by personnel wearing breathing apparatus to dispel the final traces of the gas. Cyanide gas is potentially explosive and personnel connected with operations involving it were routinely searched for matches and lighters before commencing any delousing operation.
      Leuchter told the Court that he and his team of experts had visited Birkenau-Auschwitz and other alleged “Death Camps” in Poland and had seen the buildings which are described as having been “gas chambers”; had taken samples from the walls of rooms said to have been “gas chambers” for later forensic analysis in the United States; had inspected the crematoria facilities and had inspected other buildings in—and the land surrounding—the camps. He reported as follows:
    1. None of the rooms said to have been “gas chambers” had gasketted doors or were in any other aspect of airtight construction. Had cyanide gas been released in any of the alleged “gas chambers” the camp staff would themselves quickly have fallen victim to it. Indeed, at Auschwitz the “gas chamber” was directly adjacent to the SS hospital. A channel ran between the two buildings along which the gas would have accumulated, causing fatalities among the hospital patients, either by gassing or an explosion.
    2. The rooms described as “gas chambers” were far too small to accommodate the hundreds of persons who were supposed to have been packed into them. Had it been possible to cram the rooms as claimed, the occupants would have died of asphyxiation, even though the doors were not gasketted, long before cyanide gas could have permeated the remaining space in the room not taken up by people. Had people been crammed in the rooms in the numbers claimed, and had the rooms been filled with cyanide gas, then the job of extracting the corpses without preliminary intensive ventilation would have led to the deaths of those performing the work—and those supervising it—if they wore no breathing apparatus, especially if searches of the corpses’ orifices were conducted immediately on removal.
    4. The crematoria at all camp sites were of the conventional type, fired by coke. Some cremation chambers (retorts) could accommodate two corpses, most only one. Such retorts could only reduce cadavers to a few bones (which thereafter would have to be pulverised) after a period of hours. None of the “extermination” sites had anything like the number of crematoria retorts capable of reducing to ashes the huge number of corpses which were allegedly being produced by the “gas chambers”. Each of the camps examined had a necessary number of crematoria retorts in relationship to the camps’ populations and the likely death rate from all of the usual natural causes (not including severe epidemics like typhus).
    5. Any attempt to burn corpses in deep pits would be quite futile as all of the camps examined were built on marshland with a water table about 18 inches below the surface. Any hole deeper than that would quickly become a pond. Corpses cannot be burned under water, even with the assistance of petrol.
    6. Leuchter’s team had not only taken samples from the walls of alleged “gas chambers” at the camps visited, but also samples from rooms where all agree that clothes had been subjected to cyanide gas for delousing purposes. These samples bad been given to a reputable firm of forensic scientists who regularly undertake work for American Courts. They were not told where the samples had come from nor the reason for the examination. They were merely asked to report on the content of cyanide in the various samples. The forensic scientists’ report, in the form of a sworn affidavit, indicated that the content of cyanide in the samples which came from the walls of rooms used to delouse clothes was extremely high, but the samples taken from rooms where supposedly millions of people over a period of years had been gassed to death, showed almost no cyanide content whatsoever.
      The very small amount of cyanide to register from the samples taken from the walls of the alleged “gas chambers” was due to the universally acknowledged fact that those rooms, along with all other rooms in these camps, were periodically deloused by means of cyanide gas in an attempt (eventually in vain, as we have discussed earlier) to protect the inmates from outbreaks of typhus.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

ANNE FRANK’S STORY
As a footnote to the twin subjects of the reputation of Auschwitz as an “Extermination Camp” and the fatalities caused by typhus, we might observe that the tragic Anne Frank of Anne Frank’s Diary fame was sent to Auschwitz after she and her family were captured by the Germans in Holland. If the ‘Holocaust’ horror story accounts of Auschwitz are to be believed, Anne would have been an early candidate for the “gas chamber” as she was too young and not strong enough to perform hard physical work. Yet even as publisher’s postscripts to ‘her’ book, statements made by her by her father after the war (another member of the legion of ‘Survivors’), and statements made by the ‘Anne Frank Foundation’ readily concede, Anne did not get gassed at Auschwitz. She did not even die at Auschwitz. For some reason, the cruel Third Reich, having built an “Extermination Camp” for just such hapless victims as she, and having sent her there at some expense by train, they added to it by keeping her alive and healthy and then, unaccountably, went to the yet further expense of sending her on another train journey, this time to Germany (to Belsen, in fact) where, near the end of the war she, along with so many of her fellow inmates, contracted typhus and died, with not a gas chamber in sight. (There were no “gas chambers” in Belsen, as even Jewish propagandists admit nowadays.)
      Anne’s end was tragic, but we think the events which immediately preceded it provide some additional perspectives by which we can judge the worth of ‘Holocaust’ fable.
      [We think it right to state at this stage that the information which we have given above concerning the evidence supplied given by Fred Leuchter to the second trial of Ernst Zuendel in Canada, constitutes only a very abbreviated digest of the facts which he put on record under oath. However, we believe we have given sufficient of his evidence to indicate, when it is compared with the horror stories highlighted in Jewish propaganda, that the fundamental proposition of the ‘Holocaust’ legend: that the German Nazis set about the “systematic extermination” of the Jewish race on a mass production basis by means of “gas chambers” in “Death Camps” such as Auschwitz, has no foundation in fact and is, on the contrary, a propaganda invention designed morally to intimidate Gentiles and thus provide the Jews with a carte blanche to behave as the Lords of the Earth which they believe that they are—or are destined by their God to become. Those who wish to study Fred Leuchter’s evidence in greater detail should obtain a copy of The Leuchter Report at £5 from: Focal Point Publications, Duke Street London, W1M 5DJ]
      Leuchter’s revelations caused high anxiety among Jewish ‘Holocaust’ propagandists, though they were quick to use their power to ensure that nowhere in the world did the mass media report any aspect of his evidence and have now set about trying to destroy his company and his livelihood. But despite their evil and subversive hounding of this honest and brave man the truth about the ‘Holocaust’ lie is leaking out. It is essential that it be exposed for it is the greatest single propaganda weapon in Jewry’s arsenal. This big lie, together with the monopoly control which Jewish bankers exert over the mass media, constitute the principal means whereby the majority of Gentiles is kept in a passive trance of guilt, fear and ignorance.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
THE JEWS WERE EXPELLED FROM BRITAIN ONCE BEFORE

THROUGHOUT history various nations which hospitably admitted an influx of Jews in the first instance eventually became aware that the Jews were ungrateful Gentile-hating cuckoos in the national nest, and so expelled them.
      When King Edward the First came to the throne of England he soon became aware of the social and economic problems the Jewish community was causing as a result of their usury. Unlike other kings and national leaders then and now, Edward would not allow himself to be bribed by the Jews into protecting their money-lending activities. On the contrary, in 1275 he passed a law forbidding them from practising usury. It is often claimed by Jewish propagandists that their ancestors only took up usury in olden times because they were forbidden to engage in any other trade or occupation. This was not the case in Edward’s England. In his law he declared that the Jews could only earn their living as merchants, farmers, craftsmen or soldiers—the honest occupations followed by their Gentile fellow-subjects. But the Jews were not happy with this law, so they secretly carried on with their usury, and also engaged in coin-clipping. They melted down the clippings from gold and silver coins of the realm and sold the bullion abroad, thus putting the economy of the nation in peril.
      The King finally lost patience and in 1290 he promulgated the Statute of Jewry in which all Jews were ordered out of the realm and forbidden ever to return. The full details are recorded in The Calendar of Closed Rolls: 18 Edward I and Patent Roll, Edward I, mem. 21, 2lst June 1290.
      The King expelled the Jews because he was morally opposed to usury (as was the Church at that time) and appalled by its social consequences, not because he was a Jew-hating bigot. He afforded the Jews the full protection of the law until they left his realm and, indeed, he allowed them to take their possessions with them. During the period of the expulsion one family of Jews had all their possessions stolen by a rascally sea captain who loaded his ship with the Jews’ goods at Dover, and then sailed off leaving them on the dockside tearing their hair. The King sent his navy after the ship. It was apprehended and the captain was hanged from his own yard-arm. The Jews, with their possessions, were then given safe escort over to France. One other family of Jews was not treated so decently during the expulsion. It was offloaded (minus possessions) onto Thames estuary mudbanks at low tide. All perished. It is noteworthy that while both these incidents are matters of historical record, a BBC2 TV ‘documentary’ broadcast early in 1991 about the expulsion of Jews from England only thought fit to mention the second incident, and deliberately suppressed mention of the first because it reflected well on the integrity of the man who delivered our land from the pestilence of Jewish usury and who was generally celebrated for his piety, valour and sense of justice. This was the same ‘documentary’ in which the sole comment on the usurious interest rates charged by Jewish bankers at that time—2 pence in the shilling per week—was that such interest rates were “usual”. No ‘cause-and-effect’ link was suggested in the programme between such rapacious usury, the hatred for Jews which grew up among all classes of English people and the expulsion of all Jews from our land. Any such suggestion, needless to say, would have been “anti-semitism of the worst possible kind ... deeply offensive”, etc.
      Unfortunately for England and for Britain as a whole, the Jews were allowed to resettle in Britain by the dictator Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell needed money for his New Model Army and the Jews were prepared to lend him all he needed in order to get a toe-hold in England once again. In correspondence between Cromwell and the leader of European Jewry at that time, Menasseh Ben Israel, the proposition was canvassed by Cromwell that the Jews be allowed to have St. Paul’s Cathedral in London (where Cromwell once stabled his cavalry horses) as their central synagogue. This unholy correspondence may still be examined at the British Museum.
      As Captain Ramsay, M.P., made plain in his book The Nameless War, Cromwell, as a commoner, had no authority to disregard the Statute of Jewry. Indeed, the Statute has never lawfully been revoked. Hence all laws which Jewish Members of Parliament have instigated [e.g. the Race Relations Act] since they were permitted to re-establish themselves, may be viewed as unlawful.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Big-lies home page ]

GOOD QUEEN BESS EXPELLED THE BLACKS
In this context, it is also noteworthy that by decree of Queen Elizabeth the First, all Blacks were expelled from Britain In the Acts of the Privy Council dated 11th August, 1596 it was decreed:
      “Her Majestie, understanding that there are divers Blackamoors brought into this realme, of which kinde of people there are already too manie, considering how God has blessed this land with great increase of people of our own nation ... those kind of people should be sent forth of the land”.
      Though King Edward and Queen Elizabeth lived hundreds of years apart, the wording of their laws (and numerous other actions in their lives) demonstrates quite clearly that they saw themselves as the protector of their people and realised that they had an obligation to put the interests of their own folk, however lowly, first before foreigners. In short, they were patriots. What a contrast there is between those two great monarchs and those who are responsible for our nation’s affairs today!
      Great harm has befallen Britain as a result of King Edward’s and Queen Elizabeth’s laws being swept aside. Jewish usurers dominate our economy and warp our culture as a result of their domination of the opinion-forming media—and we have an Afro-Asian and half-caste population said to be as many as 12 million persons.
      If the British people wish to survive they will have to find the courage, the energy and the leadership to unite and take action to re-impose these wise laws.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 


 
Publisher’s Preface To Appendix

THE preceding chapters of this booklet deal with topics which a librarian might file under such categories as ‘Politics’, ‘Finance’, ‘History’, ‘Sociology’ and ‘Philosophy’. Disparate though they may seem, we are confident that our Author has wedded them together to provide a coherent, valuable and viable insight into what has happened, is happening now and seems/likely to happen to our nation and the world at large—and why. The case he makes can be understood and we believe, accepted by perceptive readers from all manner of backgrounds who will not fail to take note that he has brought to his dissertations a strong Christian viewpoint.
The Appendix that follows highlights some of those views which the Author believes are crucial to a complete understanding of the central thesis of the booklet and offer encouragement to those prepared to do battle.

THE BIBLE AND MULTIRACIALISM
THE BIBLE, which forms the true basis of the Christian faith, nowhere teaches the amalgamation of races. What it does teach is that God is the author of racial separation and that He originally scattered the races across the face of the earth, assigning to each its own territory. In promoting and defending the mixing of races, ministers of religion have placed themselves firmly on the side of the enemies of God. It is the Communists, the Illuminati, the UNO and other assorted anti-God groups who are determined to destroy the God-given and ordained entity of race.
      Of course, all of this is no wonder, for the religious leaders of the people have largely rejected The Bible for the twin errors of Evolution and Modernism—the so-called “Higher Criticism”. This originated with Jews who confessed Christian conversion. Many of them taught in theological seminaries in Germany from where the “Higher Criticism” spread to the rest of the world. Arthur Pachkofsky, in his book Israel and Judah wrote: “Since the time of Voltaire, Spinoza, Hegel, Kant, Paine and others, criticism of The Bible had begun. At about the same time a group of German Jewish critics, among them Straus, Hitzig, Kachne, Wellhausen and Ervald arose. They began to question every statement in The Bible and to destroy its authority. This ‘Higher Criticism’ which came out of Germany, not from Germans, but from Jews living in Germany”.
      As a consequence millions are stumbling over their faith while brainwashed and subverted clergymen preach Theology based on Jew-inspired ‘Higher Criticism’ or Judeo-Christianity to near empty pews. All exactly according to plans formulated long ago.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
ZIONISTS MISDIRECT EDUCATION

THE PROTOCOLS of the Learned Elders of Zion state: “We have got our hands into ... education and training as being the corner-stones of free existence.”
      Our State system of education has been deliberately misdirected from the top down for years. We have witnessed the destruction of thousands of excellent village Primary schools and most of the Grammar and Modern schools to be replaced by inferior Middle and High schools—huge factory-like entities that can be more easily controlled from the top of the pyramid of power.
      Teachers have been thoroughly brainwashed in their colleges of education in false and pernicious theories that have done incalculable harm to children in our schools. Misnamed “progressive methods of education” such as the ‘Discovery Method’ of teaching (which The Protocols describe as “a departure from the truth in every case”—and the fools that follow them as “brainless heads”) have resulted in the erosion of real discipline and learning.
      If you want proof of this, consider the fact that pupils are now doing millions of pounds worth of damage to their own schools, while schools themselves are turning out an ever-increasing number of weirdos, freaks and social misfits as standards of reading, writing, numeracy and examination achievements plummet. Opportunistic headmasters, chosen, as The Protocols suggest, “with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience” may be oblivious to the real significance of what has taken place but those at the top of the educational hierarchy know exactly what they are about. Education today has become a corrupt system for the mismanagement and misleading of the young.
      Those blockheads who have shown themselves the most ready and willing to absorb and propagate whatever nonsense and filth is fed them from above, have been promoted and advanced. It is from this element that Heads are recruited. “Success” in education, no less than in politics, depends on subservience to all the destructive policies of the Hidden Hand of Jewry. As The Protocols state: “But above all let us control education, by this means we spread ideas that are useful to us and shape the children’s brains as suits us”. This control is now being revealed thanks to Freemasons, dupes and stooges in our Education Authorities and in our schools.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
ZIONIST HOAX UNMASKED

OF ALL the many lies promoted and advanced by our lying news media and controlled State education system, none has more far-reaching consequences than the ‘Man from Monkey’ myth—the Theory of Evolution.
      The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, which numerous well-informed people claim spells out Jews’ plan for the destruction of Christian Civilisation, state: “Think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism [Evolution] ... To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had on the minds of the Goyim [i.e. human cattle]... We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the Goyim by rearing them in principles and theories (like Evolution) which are known by us to be false, although it is by us that they have been inculcated ... We also robbed them of their faith in God”... Only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that Christian religion ...”
      A copy of this remarkable document was placed in the British Museum in 1906. Most of it is prophetic and as 95% of it has now been meticulously fulfilled there can be little doubt that whoever wrote it has controlled the history of the Twentieth Century. The New York Jewish lawyer Henry Klein declared in his books Zionism Rules the World and A Jew Exposes the Jewish World Conspiracy that The Protocols were “... The world plan of the Jewish Sanhedrin—the Heads of Zionism—which desires world control ... led by the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers... The Sanhedrin controls all sources of information. No newspaper is free from Zionist control. Every large radio and T.V. chain is under control... every system of education and religion is under control ... ”
      Intelligent people are aware that wars are conducted not just with martial weapons of death and destruction, but also with ideas, words, music, films ... in fact with propaganda through every medium which can reach the human mind. The Jewish Communists have refined propaganda warfare down to a fine and deeply cynical art which can be described as Mind Control. Their techniques were revealed in a book by Charles Stuckley entitled Brainwashing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psycho-Politics published by the College of Scientology, New York, in 1955. The Russian textbook had a Foreword by the Jewish Communist mass-murderer Levrenti Beria, Chief of the Soviet secret police during the 1940s (then known as the N.K.V.D.).
      The book revealed that by means of “the scientific approach... man must be degraded from a spiritual being to an animalistic reaction... man must be consistently demonstrated to be a mechanism without individuality... Religion must become unfashionable by demonstrating that Man is an animal. We have battled since the century’s turn to bring to nothing any and all Christian influences and we are succeeding... We must destroy all faiths in nations marked for conquest ... you must work until religion is synonymous with insanity”.
      It is the Theory of Evolution which teaches that “Man is an animal”, and it is the Theory of Evolution that has done more than anything else to undermine and destroy the Christian faith and belief in God and The Bible.
      In his introduction to the edition of The Origin of the Species published by Dent in the Everyman series, Professor W. R. Thompson confirmed that “the decline of Christianity is largely due to the influence of Darwin”. Those who seek a concise and scathing refutation of the Theory of Evolution by an expert biologist would do well to read Prof. Thompson’s ‘Introduction’. He examined various lines of evidence usually advanced in support of the theory and demolishes them one by one. He wrote: “I am not satisfied that Darwin proved his point or that his influence on scientific and public thinking has been beneficial ... But the facts and interpretations on which Darwin relied have now ceased to convince. The long continued investigations on heredity and variation have undermined the Darwinian position ... since no one has explained to my satisfaction how evolution could happen, I do not feel impelled to say it has happened”. This distinguished biologist stated the absolute truth when he wrote that Evolutionists attempted to maintain the credit of the Theory of Evolution with the public “... by the suppression of criticism and the elimination of difficulties”.
      In fact, discoveries have been made in recent years which prove the Theory of Evolution to be false. These discoveries include:
1. The discovery of shoe prints and human footprints in some of the most ancient rocks on earth. Perfect shoe prints in Cambrian rocks, claimed by Evolutionists to be 500 million years old, and dated beyond doubt because they contain small trilobites (ancient sea creatures) embedded in them proving that they must have been made when the rocks were soft mud. Prints in Permian sandstone, Carboniferous rocks and numerous shoe prints and bare foot prints in Cretaceous rocks, often side-by-side with footprints of dinosaurs, proving that men lived at the same time as the dinosaurs, not 80 million years apart as taught by Evolutionists. Men were alive when all the rocks of the Geological column were laid down. The discovery of these prints makes moonshine of the whole idea of Evolution.
2. The discovery of fossil pollen grains from Angiosperm and Gymnosperm plants in all of the rocks of the Grand Canyon in Arizona from top to bottom, including the pre-Cambrian Proterozoic rocks, claimed to be 1,000 million years old. This proves that the most advanced plants were alive and flourishing when all these rocks were laid down. Dr. Clifford L. Burdick who has done much work on fossil pollen in the Grand Canyon has tried to get his work published in Nature, The Scientific American [sic], etc., and has met a brick wall. The truth regarding the Theory of Evolution is being deliberately suppressed.
3. The discovery of fossil skulls of modern type, large-brained men in older rocks than any of the supposed links, proving man did not evolve. The Calaveras skull, now in the Peabody Museum of Harvard University in the United States, was found in the early Pliocene rocks dated, according to Evolutionists, at 10 million years, yet it has a bigger brain capacity than modern European man. These ancient skulls are not mentioned in any recent book on the subject. Evolutionists pretend they don’t exist. But they do exist and prove the Theory of Evolution to be totally fraudulent.
      Sir Cecil G. Wakely, Past-President of the Royal College of Surgeons, wrote in a Foreword to the book Creation or Evolution by Professor H. Enoch: “Scripture is quite definite that God created the World and I for one believe that to be fact not fiction. There is no evidence scientific or otherwise to support the Theory of Evolution yet it is still taught in our universities, schools and colleges.”
      It should be remembered that Marx offered to dedicate his new book Das Kapital to Charles Darwin. The Theory of Evolution forms the foundation stone of atheistic Marxism/Communism and Humanism and many other ‘isms’ which have plagued 20th century Man. Neither should it be forgotten that Darwin renounced and repudiated the Theory of Evolution on his death bed.
[ Introduction | Chronology Notes | Contents of 'The Longest Hatred' | Case Against Jews | Big-lies home page ]

 
THE DESTRUCTION OF EVIL—THE TRIUMPH OF GOOD

WHEN visiting London not long ago one of the contributors to this volume saw painted in large letters across a brick wall the anarchist symbol together with the slogan: “God is Dead”. Let there be no doubt that God is very much alive! However, we must fight evil with all our might. The whole world is in chaos with world-wide pollution both human and environmental—but the ultimate picture is bright. Right and Truth is of God and will triumph in the end for no one defeats God. The current world situation and all the signs of the times make it clear that the intervention of God in world affairs and the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ is imminent. All the forces of evil, the secret subterranean powers that have for so long controlled events on this planet are doomed to destruction. This is why Jewish World Government will fail and all the machinations of evil men and their stooges will founder.
      “For my sword shall appear in Heaven and shall come down upon Edom dooming that accursed race.”
      “For it is the day of the Lord’s vengeance, and the year of recompense for the controversy of Zion”
—Isiah
Ch. 34, v. 5 & 8, Moffat A.V.


[Back to start of The Longest Hatred | Home page | Case Against Judaism]
HTML Rae West. 2000-07-04. Picture and chronology 2000-09-02. Note from a friend of Irving 2012-11-01. Added links 2014-02-03. Kitty Little notes and links added 2014-02-21. Mobile friendly 2015-06-19. H1 heading in place of H3 2017-01-05. Baruel and Isiah and Amshel note 2019-07-17

Top of Page
image   Review of Ireland revisionism   Tom Reilly: Cromwell: An Honourable Enemy

Splendid revisionist work though I'd prefer a little more, July 11, 2010

It's a bit harsh to give this only four stars. Generally most things about this book are excellent. The sources are laid out fairly clearly—a bibliography, mostly 20th century and some nineteenth, and 'Miscellaneous Publications' including such things as a BBC programme, one edition of a newspaper, and a lecture. Each chapter has endnotes, and their references match up with the bibliography, at least usually.

However there are some niggles:

[1] Not many original documents are mentioned, and the presumption is they've been printed accurately. But one can never be sure. To be fair many have probably vanished or decayed or would be difficult to get hold of in the original.

[2] Reilly often enough says such-and-such a person never visited Ireland, or some similar definite statement; how can he be so sure? No doubt he's likely to be right, but ...

[3] He doesn't state the official Irish view of Cromwell. We're not all Irish, and some of us haven't been exposed to the Irish education system. Reilly does lay out clearly the object of Cromwell's military expedition, viz to control Ireland, and take lands from Royalists. But it's left rather unclear. Admittedly a revisionist book doesn't have to deal with every aspect of a topic, but the reason Cromwell's of interest in Ireland is exactly because of what he was supposed to have done. (As an example—take 'plantations'. They couldn't have been for spices, sugar cane, tobacco; were they trees? Or what?) Under the rules of the age, was it accepted that a supporter of a losing side should lose possessions?

[4] He doesn't give details of real or supposed massacres of Protestants before Cromwell got there. (Or subsequent events such as the 'Black and Tans').

[5] He seems to take Cromwell as a great commander as an established fact. But it certainly appears at first sight as though the main advantage he had was simply lots of cannon of various types. Cromwell just battered away at town walls (and these medieval towns were small—400 yards was a typical narrowest width). The Drogheda commander seems to have not realised what he was up against.

Some of the reviews here lay stress on one or two documents—and it's often a suspicious sign when conclusions hang on the words of just one or two witnesses, or supposed witnesses. Connoisseurs of this kind of thing will recognise parallels with other atrocity stories, though on a much tinier scale, and parallels with later historians repeating parrot-style. Reilly maintains that much of the force of the 19th century Irish 'rebel' movement was based on fake atrocity stories. The whole idea of Ireland as 'the most distressful country that ever yet was seen' needs a bit of realistic debunking.

I'm sure Tom Reilly started something in 1999, though I wouldn't dare guess how long it will be before he becomes mainstream.

Note added later: [6] The Jewish issue is ignored!

Top of Page
Hill Winstanley   Rerevisionist's Review of     Selections from the Works of Gerrard Winstanley edited by Leonard Hamilton. Introduction by Christopher Hill (1944)
    Review 30 Sept 2015
Not Very Clear Presentation of the Last Days of the English Civil Wars About 1650

365 years later, the English Civil Wars remain confusing, and of course a primary reason is the squid ink of obscurity over Jewish activities. The funding of Cromwell by Jews in Holland was known by about 1900: a letter having been found, with as far as I know the involvement and publicity skills of Lord Alfred Douglas. Christopher Hill is (or was in his heyday) always referred to as a 'Marxist'; therefore it is extremely unlikely he would draw any attention to Jews in his historical writings.

Scotland is a player in this drama: Scotland is claimed never to have expelled Jews, and no doubt there is a close connection between Jewish funding and Scottish politics and Freemasonry in Scotland. Note also that the Putney Debates were discussions, a few years earlier in 1647, between members of Cromwell's New Model Army, concerning a new constitution for England. These debates (not published in Britain till 1951) are sometimes regarded as the foundations of democracy: the debates no doubt must have been steered by Cromwell, in a pro-Jewish and pro-Freemason direction. So it seems clear much of the foundation of what became known as 'democracy' was founded during and after the 'Civil Wars', and ought to be studied by specialists who wish to 'deconstruct' democracy's inbuilt inferences. The monarchy was restored in 1660, Charles II returning from the Netherlands and being installed about 11 years after Charles I's execution, as King of Three Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland. Soon after (1661) Cromwell's body was exhumed and exhibited. This has been explained as reaction to Cromwell as a traitor, or as a reaction to his puritanism. But perhaps he was no longer useful to money power. Soon came the 'Great Fire' of London, and the building of the 'Bank of England', and the gradual impoverishment of many sections of the populace.

Another issue was the Church of England, administratively called into being in 1534 with the Act of Supremacy. In other words, by the time of the final Civil War, the Church of England was about a century old, making allowance for a few decades for its policies to settle. The battles, the weakness of clerics against violence, the feelings against Rome and Catholicism, and the progress of science, combined to accelerate that Church's long decline into careerist compromise and intellectual emptiness.

This book's contents include the texts of pamphlets (spelling and punctuation somewhat modernised) including (for the first two I attempt to mimic the typography): The True Levellers Standard ADVANCED: OR, the State of Community opened, and Presented to the Sons of Men (1649), A DECLARATION FROM THE Poor oppressed People OF ENGLAND DIRECTED To all that call themselves, or are called Lords of Manors, ... (1649). And A Letter to Lord Fairfax and his Council of War, (1649), An Appeal to the House of Commons (1649), An Appeal to the House of Commons (1649), An Appeal to all Englishmen (1650), and An Humble Request to the Ministers of both Universities and to All Lawyers in every Inns (1650).

According to Hill, Winstanley came from Wigan before leading the Diggers in St George's Hill (which they called George-Hill, omitting the 'saint') and coming into contact with Kingston magistrates and others. He had some education, e.g. quoting Latin. Chris Hill says the Diggers were a nine days wonder; 'no one knows where or when Winstanley died.' He was anti-clerical; see e.g. the summons of Winstanley and Everard, and the decision of officialdom not to act, while the locals, including the parson, dug up their seeds and pulled down and burnt 'houses'. (I'm uncertain how solid these 'houses' were).

All sides in the Civil Wars drew parallels from the Bible, in English: The Coverdale Bible (both 'Testaments' in English) of 1535 being the first, and the Geneva Bible of 1560 being the most detailed. Thus there had been about a century for the curious and fanatical messages to permeate the Church of England, and the English mind.

Winstanley wrote, at first, mystical religious writings, of which the editor has included none. He went on to a 'Magnificent panegyric against priestly obscurantism and deception, and in favour of education and rational science.' And to what are now called political writings, largely based on Bible tales. "When Adam delved, and Eve span, who was then the gentleman?" illustrates the principle from a couple of centuries earlier. Winstanley had a 'Law of Freedom' based (I think) on his interpretation of ancient Biblical times, published in The Law of Freedom in a Platform, or True Magistracy Restored (1651), a draft of new laws which I have not attempted to understand. He wrote '.. Every single man, male and female, is a perfect creature of himself.'

Christopher Hill of course accepts the 20th-century Jewish pretence that their power struggle is a 'revolution': (my emphasis)
  'This [Diggers on St George's Hill] occurred at the climax of a great revolution when the victorious Parliamentary Army was enforcing the confiscation of church, crown and royalist estates, and had brought Charles I to the scaffold. The whole country was in the throes of a political and economic crisis. Many men had been evicted from their holdings; taxes and free-quarter had ruined others as well as Winstanley, and there had been much unemployment. The rank and file of the Army, to whom lavish promises had been made, were anxious to share in the fruits of victory. May, 1649, was to see a revolt of the Levellers in the Army, which aimed at universal suffrage, and legal and economic reform in the interests of the small man. ..'

There's a fascinating emphasis on the Normans in Winstanley, something which more recent divide-and-rule tactics (religions in Thirty Years War, black slaves, American colonists, French vs the rest, classes, Germans etc etc) have completely suppressed:-
  [The question] Whether William the Conqueror became not to be King of England by conquest, turned the English out of their birthrights, burned divers towns, whereof thirty towns were burned by him in Windsor Forest..'
  Therefore, England, beware: thou art in danger of being brought under the Norman power more than ever. The King Charles that was successor to William the Conqueror thou hast cast out; and though thy Parliament have declared against the kingly office and cast it out and proclaimed England a commonwealth, that is, to be a free land for the liberty and livelihood of all her children, yet William the Conqueror's army begins to gather into head again, and the old Norman prerogative law is the place of their rendezvous. ..
  [1651]: 'Sir [Cromwell] God hath honoured you with the highest honour of any man since Moses' time, to be the head of a people who have cast out an oppressing Pharaoh. For when the Norman power had conquered our forefathers, he took the free use of our English ground from them, and made them his servants. And God hath made you a successful instrument to cast out that conqueror, and to recover our land and liberties again, by your victories, out of that Norman hand. ..'

Interesting times which, I hope, the new discoveries of revisionism will help clarify, perhaps for the first time.

Top of Page
Luddites   Review of   Robert Reid   Land of Lost Content: The Luddite Revolt, 1812   (Publication: 1986)

It's time for a 21st Century Revisionist look at the Industrial Revolution in England
My copy is an unillustrated paperback. The author was a BBC hack, responsible e.g. for 'The Voyages of Charles Darwin'; Reid seems to have recanted, after reading about Alfred Russel Wallace. One has to wonder whether this book, in BBC style, rested on the labours of 'researchers'. It has quite long endnotes, a bibliography (including what are listed as primary and secondary sources—including Home Office papers and newspapers), and an index.

    This book deals with pre-1812-ish Yorkshire mostly, partly because Reid came from there. Its map has Manchester (then much smaller) with Stockport and the towns and hamlets running ENE on a scarp slope, spanning damp, steepish, water-powered cotton areas and wool. Before the 'French Revolution', we're told of fairly evenly distributed wealth with small masters whose interests weren't that different from handcraft 'hands'.
    New inventions (e.g. cast iron shearing equipment) were made in northern England, and shipped by canal barges and horse-and-cart to the stone built mills. We're told croppers were muscular types—trimming woollen cloth for four times typical wage. 'They had a lot to lose.'

Then: 1812, Napoleon in Moscow. British Orders in Council from 1807 had prohibited trade with continental ports. And there were, we're told, poor harvests, and of course war over the 'French Revolution'. In something like a prefiguring of the 'cotton famine' and American Civil War 50 years later, the USA declared war on Britain about then (this of course is rarely mentioned). Revisionism 1: Since 1776 there were issues over a central US bank; Spencer Perceval was no doubt assassinated in 1812 on this dreadful issue, which however seems to have been settled in favour of Jews and the Bank of England. George III was King at the time.
    This was more militarized than might have been expected from placid incurious histories. Wellington was short of horses because of the 'unrest' in Lancashire. The blurb says: '.. already stretched by the demands of the war against Napoleon.. violent demonstrations across the North of England against.. new machinery in the woollen industry. .. The North was virtually annexed by troops and, though the riots were quelled and seventeen leaders .. hanged, the shock of that near-revolution reverberates to this day.'

The Luddites (origin of the name uncertain) according to Reid had oath taking, large followings, and secret attacks on mill buildings with destruction of machinery. There were fight backs by some mill owners. Revisionism 2: Reid doesn't seem to deal with the legal powers of owners and shareholders; presumably propagandists got to work to make as much money as possible for either financiers or their derivative capitalists. In 1815, Nathan Rotschild pulled off his Stock Exchange informational swindle after the battle of Waterloo; which must have had considerable effect.
    The 1832 Reform Bill must have represented in part Jewish aspirations. A few years later, Chartism started, as, presumably, a genuine socialism-from-below movement. If machinery provides greater wealth, why not spread it? Reid doesn't look at this possibility. Revisionism 3: this was disliked by the wealthy, and perhaps the uncomfortably unwealthed of 1815. Probably Marxism, set up by rich Jews, with its irrelevant Hegelian confusions, was intended to sabotage such movements.

The Military Situation: some claim England was near civil war. Lt Gen Thomas Maitland, a Scot, was put in command of the North West (and later NE). Maitland understood the issues—Reid says he was virtually the only person to understand the effects of the machines on the people. Maitland used something like commandos, as scares—a force would turn up at night and disrupt huge meetings, which were not well armed and were easily scared, as Maitland soon found.
    The 'civil war' idea, or revolution idea—based on French Revolution and/or American Declaration of Independence—seems to have been unlikely to happen. Reid states this was at least partly due to absence of leaders. Reid devotes a chapter (p 140 - 'Radical Reformers') to surveying likely candidates for leadership: Cobbett, Whitbread, Wilberforce, John Cartwright, Sir Francis Burdett. The working classes just had too limited a perspective, says Reid, and educated men were marked as dangerous.
    Maitland eased his rheumatism at Buxton, then fairly newly fashionable, in the company of young men, we're told. The work was left to Captain Francis Raynes. When things were under control, Raynes received one sum in payment, and spent years of petitioning for more. A solicitor called Lloyd used solitary confinement and other methods (never disclosed) to get confessions. When things were quiet, Maitland seems to have sacked him, too.

Legal: Many of the laws were recent - partly of course because industry was new. (P 298 of Derry and Williams 'A Short History of Technology' shows that a lot of inventions in a small space of time did in fact exist; there really was an 'industrial revolution'). The death penalty was common enough. York was chosen, being be remote. The bodies were to be 'anatomised'. P. 273: '... flagrant political manipulation of the judiciary. ... one of the severest acts of brutality ever engineered by a British government against a section of its citizenry. ... a verdict of guilty had been a foregone conclusion...'

Illustrative characters included a murdered mill-owner, an inventor/ entrepreneur, Patrick Brontë and Jane Austen (with little comprehension of the issues), a newspaper owner, a magistrate, and an heiress's husband who used her money to build Liversedge church, as a piece of Church of England triumphalism.
    Reid seems to think technology is unresistable: the last-but-one chapter, 37, gives examples which it proved futile to oppose. But it's not that straightforward: woollen workers were not allowed to leave the country, even if they were starving, as they had specialist knowledge. Brewer's Phrase and Fable gives examples of blocked inventiones, as does Robert Graves in 1972. Felkin (1867) says Rev William Lee of a stocking loom in Elizabeth I's time was 'hounded out of England'; Daumas' 1980 History of Technology gives another 16th century example, a ribbon weaving treadle mill: Danzig Municipal Council drowned the inventor. 1950s machinery, and cheap oil and gas, meant that less than a fifth Yorkshire miners were needed (per ton?) than in the 1920s. (P. 283 has info on 1970s cotton and woollen industries, steel, shipbuilding, and newsprint).

Afterwards, with the Luddites crushed: P 285 says freedom from prosecution was offered in return for information, but apparently not convincingly; some men feared the death penalty to their end. For the first time 'a huge gulf opened between the owner/managers and employees. That's one way of putting it; for the first time, there was potentially huge money in industry. Revisionism 4: Engels and Marx seem to have got together to head off association between workers, not, as in the enlarged-Jew-century version, to help workers to get their due.

E P Thompson's Making of the English Working Class 1790s-1830s includes the Luddites time-span, but is (from memory) naive about Marx. Thompson's pervasive presumption is that any inequality is unfair; he never notices that consumers could presumably have boycotted machine made fabrics. And doesn't trouble much about 'classes', as required by Marx's Jewishness. What about soldiers and sailors? Small businesses? Farm labourers? Servants? Teachers?

'George Orwell' discusses Trade Unions, notably in Dickens: '... the illegal or barely legal unions of Dickens's own day, with their secret assemblies, passwords and so forth. ..' perhaps taken from the Luddites' secret oath. On this subject, compare Freemason's oaths: these weren't suppressed, Luddite's oaths were suppressed.

Samuel Smiles: e.g. Self-Help (1859 and later) is interesting in not promoting group effort, but listing individuals, including failed descendants of once-famous people, and people, dull at school, who became successful. And conversely, what happened to all the prize boys and duxes? It includes questionable stuff—industrial espionage, a man who twice went to Sweden, posing as a fiddler, to get the secrets of 'splitting iron'. Somewhere there's a story of a man stealing pottery secrets, by posing as a simpleton & requiring all the process to be explained. Smiles has no stories of foreigners intrepidly stealing British secrets—apparently Pakistanis did this to Sheffield steel a century later. An interesting book, though probably not reliable. I mention it here because of the shift in emphasis: so far as I know, there are no popular books explaining how to organise groups of people towards some aim.

RW 30 Nov 2017

Top of Page
Review of   The Strange Death of Liberal England   George Dangerfield

Party Political Story Tragically Hiding the Jewish Money behind the Scenes

The Jewish money power was to shape the entire 20th century. Very unfortunately, there was a media oligopoly, in which the BBC must be included, which fooled most of the people most of the time. George Dangerfield's The Strange Death of Liberal England published in 1935 (Dangerfield was about 30) is yet another evasionist work which fails to mention Jews. Judging by Dangerfield's life and career, he may have been descended from immigrant crypto-Jews.

The main Jewish thrusts at the time included:
    Jewish women, with their 'suffragettes' scam, including violence, but also a cover for Jewish or Jew-funded thugs, causing various types of damage of the sort characteristic of Jews. Fortunately, Britain was less contaminated by Jews than eastern Europe, notably Russia, but even so they were entrenched, from the (((Bank of England))) down.
    Parliament, in both houses: The House of Lords was threatened with flooding by newly-created 'life peers'. The Jewish-based 'Labour Party', by 1910, had 42 Labour MPs and the long haul of frantic accusations of Labour vs Tory began in earnest, with no discussion of the most basic issues, a pattern which remains today.
    Trade Unions. In 1920, Hilaire Belloc remarked on a Jew having a family member heading a trade union; generally, this was ridiculed—with talk of cigar-makers unions, for example, though of course many unions had much further-reaching influence. Dockers (in those days, manual labour at dock lining the urban Thames and other rivers), miners, and railwaymen (no motorways then) went of strike, though the numbers and intensities were exaggerated by the Jew-controlled media. After Dangerfield's time there were strange mutations in unions: for example teachers and some public services implemented Jewish policies on mal-education, and on nonwhite immigration.
    Laws and the legal system. Jews of course could buy their ways in; almost unnoticed was and is the bias towards Jewish money. For example, patents were expensive and time-limited, whereas company ownership was not time-limited. As the Luddites showed, finance was given priority over inventions. Laws on immigration and name-changing were slack, as suited Jews. The criticism and extinction of the Chartists suited Jews. The 'National Insurance' system was probably designed to increase the 'National Debt', which meant guaranteed money for Jews, for no effort. Clearly laws on news had to permit large-scale lying; there were and are no legal penalties for lying, though presumably this would be possible.
    Ireland. In retrospect, this seems an absurdly minor issue; just a smallish island, after all. But both Roman Catholics and Protestants had Jewish roots, and that country had little education. As in Poland, it was a sitting duck for Jews and their associates; and this remains true today—look up Shatter for example.

Here's an online Amazon reviewer: In 1906 the Liberal Party came to power with a landslide unmatched until the rise of New Labour in 1997. The Cabinet was arguably the most talented ever assembled, including Herbert Asquith, David Lloyd George, Winston Churchill and Lord Grey ... In 1916, the prosecution of the Great War had forced the political parties into coalition. The Liberals have never held power since, and nearly disappeared altogether in the 1950s. ...
    Reading this gullible nonsense is a reminder, as if one is needed, of the power of media control over propaganda. Note for Americans: the meaning of 'liberal' has mutated over the years; naturally, the American media meaning suits Jews.

'Rerevisionist' 28 Nov 2017

Top of Page
Webb Suffragettes Terrorism   Review of   Simon Webb's book   Suffragette Terrorism
Suffragette Terrorism? Explosions in Britain Attributed to Suffragettes before the 'Great War'     12 Sept 2015. A few bits 3 Sept 2017
Many more collected book reviews by 'Rerevisionist'
Home page of Rerevisionist's website, big-lies.org.


Webb appears to be an author who has swallowed all the modern media mythology about 'terrorism'. This book has accounts of outrages, typically from 1909 to early 1914—explosions and/or arson in barracks, churches, libraries, and public buildings. I'd ask serious historians to consider the hypothesis that these explosions were carried out secretly by Jews, leaving behind false flag tokens—books, letters, 'clues', written notes, things supposed to be part of the lives of white ladies.
    Why the hell would anyone want to do something so repellent? I think probably part of the motive was to make people feel nervous and worried and apprehensive: in short, to make them follow the authorities. The feeling must have been: What could happen next? Certainly when war 'broke out', as the evasive phrase has it—in fact, Britain declared war—the suffragettes made peace with Lloyd George. And there was a newspaper campaign suggesting men needed war, civilisation was jaded and dull, battle was a cleansing influence. I'd suggest that Jews had a history of bomb throwing; consider 1905 in Russia. It's hard to believe genteel Englishwomen were skilled in the use of the then-new dynamite; whereas so-called 'anarchists', a code-word for Jews from eastern Europe, were. (At the time, they couldn't call themselves 'Communists'; that had to wait until the Jews' coup in Russia in 1917). And the targets—churches (Christian artefacts are hated by Jews), libraries (full of non-Talmudic material, hated by Jews), splendid public buildings and country houses (evidence of white skills, hated by Jews), and barracks (white soldiers—hated by Jews), make sense as part of a Jewish campaign. Here's a naive remark by Webb: '... no responsibility for these two attacks was claimed by the WSPU, it is hard to know who else could have been to blame. The suffragettes were the only terrorist group operating in Britain at that time.' Note the phrasing: 'no responsibility was claimed'; note that no evidence seems to have been found, either. Webb maintains the destructiveness of these attacks has been underestimated, or forgotten. An alternative interpretation is that, having helped achieve war, retrospective propaganda would simply omit them once their work had been done, in case people might guess, and investigate, what really happened.
    Anyone, now, who thinks all protests and demonstrations are spontaneous and honestly-motivated, to be taken at face value, must be an extremist in naïveté.
SUMMARY: [Added after Webb showed he can't read]:
I believe (though he isn't honest enough to say so) that Webb thinks he's a 'Jew' and therefore presumably is entitled to lie. The fact is - at least if his 'research' was correct - that the explosive atrocities before WW1 were NOT acknowledged by suffragettes; all that happened was bits of paper were found with 'votes for women' on them. So it's possible, in fact likely, that they were a false flag. Webb also lies in stating there were no bomb-throwers etc around at the time. In fact of course Russia was plagued by them, and they were Jews. Webb is 'raving mad' etc etc.
Added June 2019: ‘Timothy Messer-Kruse's The Haymarket Conspiracy: Transatlantic Anarchist Networks (Urbana: Uni of Illinois Press, 2012). Messer-Kruse documents two trans-Atlantic connections for groups with knowledge of dynamite: the first is the Fenians; the second, German Jews. This knowledge of explosives helps explain the Chicago anarchist bombing, for example, which the author shows was then covered up by Jewish-American New Left academics in the 1960s, who ignored the transcripts of the trial and advanced their own ideology of these anarchists as a bunch of romantic dreamers. If German Jews had connections with Jews in the United States, isn’t it somewhat likely that they had connections with both Russian Jews and Jews in England?’
      –Yes, of course it is! And 'dreamers' of course is yet another Jewish expression, to pretend some group being covertly backed by Jews are harmless. The situation strikes me as analogous with Jewish activity in long-suffering Africa. - RW
This is Bertrand Russell in 1910: Anti-Suffragist Anxieties from which it's clear Russell had no idea that front organisations can lead subversions up to the level of war.

Note added 4 Aug 2016: Suffragettes in visual media include: Up the Women (2013), Suffragette (2015), Suffragettes Forever (2015), Secrets of a Suffragette (2016), all no doubt 'feminist Jew' lies. Jew-aware critics should watch for:
  • Secret funding of suffragettes for Jewish-supported reasons
  • 'Suffragette' atrocities which in fact were never acknowledged by suffragettes
  • Absurd claims on dynamite handling etc by Suffragettes
  • Deliberate wrecking of buildings and artwork and Christian monuments, characteristic of Jewish destruction
  • Covert Jewish desire for wars to be started between whites—USA, Britain, Germany, and Russia the most important targets
  • Assumption that (for example) Pankhurst war supporters had any idea what they were talking about. The hypothesis is: they were paid by Jews to support wars between whites
  • No debate at all about 'votes for women' and probably misrepresentation that all males had the vote
  • 1913, when the Federal Reserve was started, giving Jews unlimited funding
  • After-effects of Jews in South Africa supported in vicious wars against the Boer farmers
  • False claims of Jews as victims
  • Good example? Email to comment@big-lies.org

Initial post: 13 Sep 2015 S. Webb says: It is hard to know where to begin with such a criticism as this. Perhaps dealing with the obvious misconceptions would be a good place to start. Dynamite was not a new substance in the years before the outbreak of war in 1914; it had been patented in 1867. In any case, it was not used by the suffragettes, who restricted themselves to the more widely available gunpowder and, very occasionally, nitro-glycerine. I have no idea why Mr West believes that 'anarchists' is a code-word for Jews from eastern Europe. He does seem to have Jews on the brain! Those convicted of anarchist attacks in this country at the end of the nineteenth century were not Jews at all. Perhaps Mr West might like to read up on Rollo Richards, who bombed the post offices of south London in the 1890s, or Martial Bourdin, who blew himself up at the Greenwich Observatory. Neither these men nor any of the others convicted for bomb making or arson in this country were Jews.

As for the Jews being responsible for bombing churches in Edwardian Britain; this is a little fanciful. Certainly those caught for such offences, such as Annie Bell, who was found in the act of bombing the St John the Evangelist church in Westminster, were not Jewish. I might recommend another of my books on the subject of terrorism, Dynamite, Treason and Plot; Terrorism in Victorian and Edwardian London, for a more detailed account of bombings during this period. Not one of these attacks was, as far as it known, carried out by Jews. Readers might bear in mind that Mr West has given a five star rating to Mein Kampf; which might shed some light upon his political leanings and explain why he wishes to blame the Jews for everything!

Rerevisionist says: Ah - you must be the author. I read a report that dynamite with a fuse was thrown over a wall somewhere; it was relatively new. the idea Victorian ladies would use the highly dangerous nitroglycerine is absurd.

However, Webb seems to know nothing of jewish actions in eg. Russia (e.g. murder of Stolypin), Jewish support for 1905 war of Japan vs Russia, or the attribution of atrocities to 'anarchists'. Who of course were Jews. However, the point here is that there seems no evidence at all that suffragettes carried out the violent attacks. The use of false flags by jews is a long-standing tradition, in force today. So is (e.g.) the destruction of churches, notably Orthodox churches in the USSR. It's a pity Webb has so little knowledge or interest in genuine history. There's little point reading authors like him, who aren't even aware of the issues.

Incidentally I don't blame jews for 'everything', as Webb flippantly claims. They have large numbers of defenders, collaborators, and so on.

Since Webb doesn't even understand my point, I'd suggest his book is not worth reading.

S. Webb says: As I think I have already explained, dynamite was not relatively new and had been around for almost fifty years at the time of the suffragette bombings. The idea that Victorian women would use nitro-glycerine was not at all absurd; they had the services of an analytical chemist called Edwy Clayton, who subsequently appeared at the Old Bailey. Rather than being a Jew, he came from a Methodist background. It is of course perfectly true that Stolypin was assassinated in 1911 by a Jewish anarchist called Dmitry Bogrov, but this tells us little about anarchists in general. None of those arrested in this country for terrorism in the late nineteenth century were Jews.

It is also true that some churches may well have been destroyed by Jews in other parts of the world. Those which were set fire to and bombed in Britain between 1911 and 1914 were invariably targeted by suffragettes and not Jews. Alice Wheeldon, for example, was responsible for the burning down of the church at Breadsall on 5 June 1914, Annie Bell detonated the bomb at the Metropolitan Tabernacle in London on 10 May 1914 and so on. Neither Wheeldon nor Bell were Jews. I'm not at all sure why Mr West seems to believe that there is no evidence that suffragettes carried out violent attacks. There is no shortage at all of evidence for this. Following the bombing of Lloyd George's house at Walton-on-the-Hill on 18 February 1913, Emmeline Pankhurst was convicted at the Old Bailey of inciting terrorism. The bomb itself was planted by Emily Davison, who later threw herself in front of the King's horse at Epsom. Neither Emily Davison nor Mrs Pankhurst were Jews.

If there is any evidence that Jews were responsible for any of these attacks, then of course it would be interesting to see it. Unfortunately, Mr West appears to have something of a bee in his bonnet about Jews and thinks them responsible for many of the world's ills. In this particular case he is mistaken, although any evidence which he wished to produce in support of this hypothesis would be welcomed. The fact that some Jews were in favour of the Russo-Japanese War of 1905 tells us little about who planted bombs in Britain between 1911 and 1914. Looking through Mr West's reviews of other books on Amazon reveals a common thread; he nearly always mentions Jews. Spending a lot of time hunched over a keyboard in a darkened room, writing about the Jews is bound to give anybody a distorted view of the world and it is to be hoped that some friend of Mr West's might have a quiet word with him and encourage him to get out more and find another hobby; preferably one which does not involve Jews!

Rerevisionist says: I don't care much for Webb's dishonest points here. Any serious historian knows Jews murdered tens of millions of Russians, after the Federal Reserve in 1913 put them in the position to dominate the USA economically, which of course Bernard Baruch did. If Webb thinks mass murder is a matter of having bees in bonnets, I'd recommend he either seeks psychiatric help or volunteers for investigation by psychologists.

However all this is somewhat of a waste of time; the hypothesis of Jewish involvement is an obvious one and any serious historian ought to examine it. Obviously it's unlikely the evidence will be freely available.

Clearly I was confusing Webb with someone with a serious interest in the past (and future). Perhaps he should find a new hobby appropriate to his skill level.

S. Webb says: The problem here is really a simple failure of logic. Even if it were to be true that tens of millions of Russians had been murdered by Jews, this would shed no light at all on either suffragette terrorism or the anarchist movement in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Mr West's thought process seems to be as follows. Some anarchists, such as the man who assassinated Russian Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin, were Jews; therefore anarchism was an eastern European, Jewish plot. This is why it is suggested that anarchists is a 'code-word for Jews from eastern Europe'. Of course, the great majority of anarchists were not Jews from eastern Europe at all; many of them were Italians from Catholic families. We remember, for instance, Luigi Lucheni, who assassinated Elizabeth of Austria and in this country, Francis Polti and Guiseppe Farnara, who appeared at the Old Bailey on 30 April 1894, charged with plotting to blow up the London Stock Exchange. One might as well describe anarchists as being a code-word for Catholics from southern Europe. In fact many of the most famous anarchist bombers such as Ravachol and Emile Henry were French atheists. Perhaps we should say that 'anarchists' is a code-word for atheists from western Europe!

Unfortunately, Mr West sees almost everything from the perspective of Jewish conspiracies. Whether we are talking about anarchist and suffragette terrorism, world wars and economic crises or immigration and mixed marriages, there is one solution; it's those pesky Jews, at it again! Unless, and until, we are given some solid evidence to consider, I think that we may safely dismiss this particular hypothesis. Mr West has here a public platform to show us why he thinks that it was the Jews, rather than the suffragettes, who bombed Lloyd George's house and also why he believes anarchism in the early twentieth century to be a Jewish plot. Until he does so, his ideas on the subject are best described as 'bare assertion'.

14 Sep 2015 13:09:17 Rerevisionist says: Unfortunately Webb is too ignorant to face the issue, as his mass of irreleventsia shows. And unfortunately it's therefore clear his book is worthless.

15 Sept 2015 S. Webb says: We are, alas, destined never to learn what grounds anybody would have for supposing that Jews were running around planting bombs in Edwardian Britain. This is a pity, because there is something quite entertaining about the idea of sinister rabbis fooling about with sticks of dynamite! Mr West is apparently a sensitive soul and I have inadvertently put him out of countenance. It is to be hoped that he changes his mind and tells us a little more about this hypothesis. History can be a rather dry topic sometimes and many of us would welcome a lighthearted diversion of this sort.
T. T. Rogers says: Mr. Webb,

I agree that any allegations of Jewish involvement must be supported by evidence. So far, what Rerevisionist says in this matter remains an interesting hypothesis, nothing more.

That said, you must of course know that when Rerevisionist refers to Jews in this context, he is not (or at least, not primarily) referring to 'rabbis'. That you would characterise the supposition in this way is, perhaps, telling.
Rerevisionist says: Thanks for your comment.

I'm in fact grateful to Mr Webb, though he may be surprised to hear it. It simply hadn't occurred to me before that it's extremely unlikely that suffragettes would have started bombing campaigns; after all, the whole point of parliament is to debate and discuss things, and suffragettes were wealthy enough to print 'literature' and make speeches.

And of course Jews in Russia, Germany, and for that matter the east end of London were aggressive and violent and now known to have been prime movers in the disasters of the 20th century.

I don't know Mr Webb's working methods: it may be he has copies of trial transcripts, for example, in which case he could probably investigate the hypothesis without much extra work.

And plenty more in this fruitless vein. It transpires that Webb claims to have lived in Israel for a few years; he comments on the middle east in a twitter account simonwebb54 full of anti-Palestine hate, and shares comment fantasies with a 'Black' and a 'Morgan'. It seems my initial suspicion has been unexpectedly confirmed.

Many more collected book reviews by 'Rerevisionist'
Home page of Rerevisionist's website, big-lies.org.

HTML, selection, criticism ©Rae West 2015. Uploaded as standalone page 2016-08-04. Partly to keep the reviews manageable. This revisionism version 26 Dec 2019

Top of Page
A. H. Lane (Arthur Henry Lane)   The Alien Menace. A Statement of the Case
First Published: 1928. Enlarged Edition: 1934   Review: 22 August 2017
One of the small number of books hostile to Jews published in Britain between the wars. Deals with the period from the founding of the so-called “Labour” Party, to Europe after the ‘Great War’. Although sound enough, it includes some common errors, which weaken his case, and persist today. Not therefore perfect; but filled with detail.
For my online version of Lane's book The Alien Menace, click here.
US reprint of The Alien Menace
Arthur Henry Lane (1868-1938) was essentially a vet, from a time when horses were the main transporters of men and materiel where there were no railways. As far as I can deduce from Wikipedia, Lane took part in removal of horse waste, and removing horses from Boers, in about 1900, and during the 'Great War'.

A few points of comparison: three utterly Jew-naive people were H G Wells (born a little before him, in 1866); Bertrand Russell (born a little after, in 1872) and J M Keynes (1883-1946), fifteen years younger. Arnold Leese was ten years younger, Archibald Maule Ramsay about 25 years younger. Lane knew Ramsay (who wrote Land of dope and jewry/ land that once was free/ all the Jewboys praise thee/ as they plunder thee./ Poorer still and poorer grow thy true born sons...) Here's my formatted version of Ramsay's Nameless War. Ramsay had longer historical awareness than Lane, back to Cromwell, but never integrated Christianity with his findings on Jews: his post-Munich Mr. Chamberlain was Burnt in Effigy in Moscow leaflet was issued by 'MILITANT CHRISTIAN PATRIOTS'.

When Queen Victoria died, Lane was in his early 30s. The Empire must have had a profound effect on him; he regarded anyone as alien who ‘did not serve in the British Empire or its Allies in the Great War.’ Lord Sydenham of Combe supplied his foreword; Combe was a colonial administrator, but, presumably, not concerned with money or assets. At that time, it remained fashionable to associate aristocrats with book publicity.

Lane is a perfect example of the type described by Hilaire Belloc: The Great War brought thousands upon thousands of educated men (who took up public duties as temporary officials) up against the staggering secret they had never suspected—the complete control exercised over things absolutely necessary to the nation’s survival by half a dozen Jews, who were completely indifferent as to whether we or the enemy should emerge alive from the struggle. Lane, as with many opponents of Jews, was unable to work out any united front against their simple secret cunning crushing uniformity. Lane regarded Germany as an evil opponent—this was years before the theft of European state papers by the USA was well known—and distrusted the Irish after 'they', treated as a unit, got their supposed independence; Lane was not very aware of Jews in Ireland, though of course he was aware of their name-changing fraudulence. Lane knew of Schiff and other Jew financiers, but I think had no theory of the gold standard, knew nothing of the Fed, and neglected to identify the part of the Empire which was Jew-controlled and not British. He also hated ‘Communism’ which he thought, like many others, was a belief system of its own, rather than just a smokescreen for Jewish supremacists. Jews committing atrocities were called ‘anarchists’ before 1917, but changed their name to ‘Communists’ after the Jewish coup d'état, as Lane might have noticed.

The strength of his book isn't really theoretical, but observational—he describes various events and structures, notably the so-called "Labour Party" (he always puts "Labour Party" in satire quote marks). He is acute on the BBC, on Jewish control of films, on Jew name-changing, and Jew crimes. Much of this, unfortunately, is just as applicable, and much more so, today.

I'll try to list Lane's objections to Jews (and others; but mostly Jews), inventing my own categories:–
NUMBERS, PARASITISM, DANGER, COLLUSION BY OFFICIALS. I 'The Alien Problem' is an overview, including Parliament and Trade, much controlled by Jews. II 'Number of Aliens and How they Get Here' includes wrong official figures. III 'Over-Population and Emigration' makes the case for expelling aliens. IV 'Unemployment' lists ways in which Britons are discriminated against. V 'Public Health' includes housing (though not rents and money policy), hereditary diseases, and Galton. VII 'The Cost of the Alien' has 'Labour' Party ministers and evasion of costs. And material on steamships, presumably Jewish-run. And supplanting British labour. Appendix I on 'Alien Immigration includes fake students, and fake official figures.
CRIME, MORAL DEFECTS, CROOKS, LAW CASES. Chapters VI Appendices IV ('Alien Crooks') and V ('Cases in the Courts') and VII provide a lot of newspaper-style information—including Jews who place big orders, ship them overseas, the disappear—Jan Lamprecht mentions a modern case, in South Africa.
ALIENS IN MEDIA AND EDUCATION. Chapters VIII (Films), IX (BBC) have lists of names, and such events as harming the nascent British film industry, anti-British films, the BBC's Jewish foundation, and the BBC censoring Nesta Webster. Chapter XV (Education) looks at the LSE, in particular, as an entry-point for Jews, and lists professors in many subjects, generally history, sociology, psychology and other subjects ripe for invasion by Frankfurt-School types. (I was interested to see Peierls, made a physics professor, who later became part of the atom frauds). Appendix II has an instructive piece on censorship, giving a letter from a US Jewish group requesting that a book by Lothrop Stoddard should be ignored. Henry Ford's 1920-1922 four books on world-Jewry, and his 1927 recantation are here.
ALIENS AND POLITICS IN BRITAIN. The so-called "Labour Party" (and "Independent Labour Party") is mentioned throughout. Lane likes the English Constitution, the Monarch/ House of Lords including Church of England/ House of Commons/ Party System, despite its precariousness and liability to money penetration. Chapter XVII 'Naturalisation' makes suggestions. There are many special issues: changes of name, infiltration, secrecy, forcing of unwanted immigration, secret conferences, and the subverting of aristocracies. Appendix III joins Marx, Engels, and the Hohenzollerns; Lane distrusted Germans.
      Appendix IV discusses aliens and name-changing, often to Scotch or Irish names. 'A census which returns the children of Aliens as British is misleading even if the children were born here.' Think perhaps of Ken Livingstone, George Galloway, Sutherland of Goldman-Sachs, Denis MacShane the Jew from Poland who helped Muslims rape white girls in Rotherham ...
WORLD POLITICS. Chapters X (Aliens and Revolution), XI (The Hidden Hand), XII (Aliens in Politics), XIII (Aliens in Ireland), and of course XVI (Alien Control in Palestine) help underline the infiltration, or perhaps just exposure, of the Bank of England and other groups. For example, there's a long account of the 'Rutenberg Monopoly' and a 1921 monopoly in Palestine. And an account of Dead Sea Concessions.
MONEY. XIV (Aliens in Industry and Finance) has many names of Jews (and Nesta Webster's books). Chapter XVIII (War Debts) is a depressing list of losses and payments following the 'Great War'. Well worth reading as an antidote to the mythology of ‘heroism’, and survey of the sordidness of industrialised war and its and its furtive secrets of money and equipment and propaganda.
SUGGESTED ACTION. Lane discusses VI Leglislation in and since 1914, and VII Draft Act of Parliament - Aliens Restrictions and Status. And XIX What Should Be Done.

This is not a cheering book; following Jewish impulses, there's nothing to suggest any effective work might be done either in Britain or overseas. The British Empire fell in due course (and the French Empire), assets to be taken up presumably by triumphant Jews in the USA. The impression left with me is that new theories and systems are needed, a mental revolution of the power of Newton or Wallace/Darwin.

Top of Page
Humphry Berkeley   The Myth That Will Not Die: The Formation of the National Government 1931
1978. Published by Croom Helm.


Examination of Cabinet Minutes re Ramsay MacDonald and the Labour Government in 1931.

A book I found in my search for titles including the word 'myth'. Humphry Berkeley (b 1926) was a Conservative MP who 'crossed the floor' to Labour. Humphry Berkeley was from 1959 to 1966 a Conservative Member of Parliament. From 1966 to 1970 he was Chairman of the United Nations Association of Great Britain. In October 1974 he stood as Labour Candidate in the General Election. He is an author and broadcaster and his publications include The Power of the Prime Minister (1968), Crossing the Floor (1972) and The Odyssey of Enoch (1977). He is currently writing a biography of Sir Harold Wilson. The jacket blurbs say: No figure in the Labour movement has attracted such extremes of emotion as has James Ramsay MacDonald. Loved ... for more than thirty years, his formation of the National Government in August 1931 incurred hatred, bitterness and contempt ... the odium which it engendered is without parallel in British democratic politics. ... it has made 'coalition' a polluted word in the Labour Party even today. This book provides an answer to the charge that MacDonald deliberately and cynically betrayed the Labour movement by forming the National Government with the Conservative and Liberal Parties. ...

Berkeley's book uses private papers, biographies and autobiographies; and cabinet minutes for 12th to 24th August 1931. He's a parliamentarian, not able to see the money and war policies behind the personalities—Balfour, Lloyd George, Chamberlain, Churchill and others make their stage appearances. And who could seriously embark on a biography of Harold Wilson?

Berkeley regards the unemployment crisis as financially-based: '... there had been a run on the Reichsbank of Germany. Montagu Norman [of the Bank of England] was ... approached by Herr Luther, the President of the Reichsbank, for a credit from the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve Bank. The latter made French participation a condition... The French not only put economic pressure on Germany but withdrew large sums in gold from London ... the Bank of England had been borrowing from French depositors at 2 per cent and lending to Germans at 8 per cent. The German banks were forced to repudiate their liabilities by declaring a moratorium. The London bankers then revealed that they owed foreign depositors £250 million. They had borrowed short-term and lent long-term. ...' is a typical passage. Berkeley either didn't know, or wouldn't admit, the Jewish interests in the Fed, the Bank of England, the Banque de France. Or of course the USSR; and other countries. As a result he never asks, or answers, where the flows of gold went and how employment was manipulated internationally. A typical failed book; Perhaps a shrewd reader can penetrate its surface and identify the subterranean currents.

Top of Page
Tim Evans John Christie
Page illustrating a chapter by Colin Wilson in Great Unsolved Mysteries, attributed to John Canning, 1984, paperback published by Orion Books.
  Review (December 2016) by Rerevisionist of a three-part 2016 BBC production titled  10 Rillington Place   Many movies, books, TV productions
(((British))) Cause Celebre Re-examined. Plus 1944-1975 Jews, Finance, Housing, Politics. And Other Immigrants.

Contents-
Intention of this Review
Timeline of Selected Events from 1945
Rachmanism
Truth About Jews, Loan Finance, and Housing
Oddities in Evidence and Inquiries

What is this Review for?   [ Back to Top ]
John Reginald Halliday Christie (1898 or 1899 - hanged 1953) claimed to have been injured in a WW1 gas attack. At any rate, in later life he seems to have been only able to whisper. He is variously described as a multiple killer, as gentlemanly, and as a petty criminal. The point of this piece is to re-examine the case sceptically somewhat in the style of Miles Mathis.
    As Jew-aware people will know, one of the triumphs of Jews has been to get away with murder, and to repeat these triumphs, presumably under the principle of rubbing it in. 'Jack the Ripper' in London, and Leo Frank in Atlanta are two examples, each receiving vastly disproportionate Jewish media attention; the only thing the 'Ripper' media items have in common is not mentioning Jews. 10 Rillington Place had a similar media history; could there be a common backstory?
    Preliminary note on Richard and David Attenborough. David Attenborough at a young age was a 'controller' of the BBC, with no obvious qualification. He claimed in Attenborough on Air to have received H G Wells' Outline of History in part works—although in fact these were published before Attenborough's birth. Their father of both, Frederick Levi Attenborough, was 'a scholar and academic administrator' at University College, Leicester. Richard Attenborough (b. 1923) acted in what I remember as a black-and-white film, but in fact in gloomy colour, 10 Rillington Place. He later directed, among other films, Gandhi and Cry Freedom, each of course peddling the Jewish views on Gandhi and on South Africa.

Selected Timeline of Britain from 1945–   [ Back to Top ]
1945 Eisenhower prisoner of war deaths
Eisenhower's Rhine Killing Fields. 1945. Eisenhower was a 'Swedish Jew'.

[NB these dates all Gregorian (Western) Calendar, not 'Jewish']
1944-1948 British Army personnel served in Palestine during the period 1944 - 1948
1945– Britain 1945-1962. General overview, taken from my article on a magazine, Private Eye
1945 Labour Party victory, often falsely describes as a 'landslide'. The previous General Election was in 1935; a 1939 election was prevented, presumably as part of war preparations
1945 Karl Popper ('Jew' from ?Austria) had The Open Society and its Enemies published in 2 volumes, on Plato and Hegel. Probably the origin of Soros' (Jew from ?Hungary) anti-white activities slogan later. Popper was one of the Vienna School or Vienna Circle.
1946 Bank of England Act. Sometimes wrongly named Bank of England Nationalisation Act, to hide the system of control.
1946 National Insurance Act effective 5 July 1948
1947 Indian Independence Act
1948 British Nationality Act and National Assistance Act
June 1948 'Empire Windrush' - Caribbean to Tilbury. Andrew Joyce on Jews importing Africans
1950 Timothy Evans hanged March 9, 1950
1953 John Christie hanged July 15, 1953
1953 Scientific and Medical Evidence in the Christie Case, Francis Camps (Medical Publications Ltd, 1953)
1953 Coronation of Elizabeth II
1954 Rillington Place, Notting Hill, London renamed Ruston Close. (Rillington Place, a small terrace of houses, was demolished in 1970).
1955 'Dixon of Dock Green' starts on BBC, presumably to reassure sceptics that the British police are trustworthy and honest
1957 Ewan MacColl 'folk song' about Tim Evans 'Go Down Ye Murderers'. (Added note: see Miles Mathis on Jewish infiltration of 'folk' music. MacColls ... real name was James Henry Miller. ... On his mother's side, he was a Henry, a Taylor, and a Steel. ... None of those names, including Miller, is Scottish. The name was originally Mueller. ... We are told MacColl joined the Young Communist League at age 15, writing humorous verses and skits for the Socialist theater and factory papers. As usual, this makes no sense, because we were just told in the sentence before he dropped out of school after an elementary education. ... At the same time he became an actor. ... Since the radio was a public entity, why would they hire an 18-year-old outspoken Communist in 1933? Answer: they wouldn't. ... Communism was a hard sell in the 1930s, since this was when Lenin's atrocities were being discovered in the West. ... But in the bios of those such as MacColl, this is totally ignored. He is sold as some kind of hero of the people for promoting Communism, but he was just the opposite. He later wrote songs praising Stalin, and they are still included in his anthologies.
Joe Stalin was a mighty man and a mighty man was he
He led the Soviet people on the road to victory.
He ['MacColl'] was still defending the song in interviews in 1985. ... Very strange. At age 19, MacColl married Joan Littlewood. She later became the partner of Philippe de Rothschild... [etc]).

1958 Notting Hill Riots 1958 for a few days. Presumably white protests; perhaps Jewish-promoted.
1960 b/w silent news film of Rillington Place before demolition
1961 Ten Rillington Place by Ludovic Kennedy (published by Jewish propaganda publisher, Victor Gollancz). Kennedy also wrote on the Lindbergh baby kidnapping and murder—another Jewish crime. In each case, Kennedy completely suppressed the Jewish element. The Two Stranglers of Rillington Place by Rupert Furneaux (Panther) speculated about Tim Evans and Christie—a perennial topic. Hanged by the Neck by Arthur Koestler, Rolph, and others, was published by another Jewish propaganda publisher, as a 'Penguin Special'. An appendix listed many murders in Britain.
1965 Death of Winston Churchill
1968 Enoch Powell's most famous speech
1971 Richard Attenborough as Christie in a film, which he regarded as an argument against the death penalty. Producers: Leslie Linder and Martin Ransohoff. Script by Clive Exton based on Ludovic Kennedy's book. Director: Richard Fleischer, who also directed The Boston Strangler in 1968. (See Miles Mathis on the 'Boston Strangler').
1975 The Nation Wreckers: Jewish Influence in British Politics is a sample of Jew-aware literature

Rachmanism   [ Back to Top ]
The website of the London Borough of Kensington and Chelsea has information on a 1950s neologism, 'Rachmanism': 'the exploitation and intimidation of tenants by unscrupulous landlords'. Peter Rachman (b 1919; a Jew from Ukraine and/or Poland. He came to England during the war 'as a refugee from Poland'). Rachman allegedly died a millionaire in 1962, though in his early 40s I'd suspect he may have been smuggled to Israel. A website says: Rachman started work in an estate agency in Shepherds Bush [in inner west London] but soon branched out on his own to exploit the post-war housing shortage. From 1957 onward he bought up many run down old houses in Paddington and North Kensington, using loans from his building society. To maximise his profits he wanted to get rid of sitting tenants and relet the properties at much higher rents. He developed an effective three step approach to dealing with "unprofitable tenants". [1] Tenants were offered a modest sum to leave [2] tenants' lives were made intolerable with all night music and parties in the rooms next door [3] Rachman's henchmen would go in and cut off electricity and water and break locks and lavatories. The new tenants were usually immigrant families from the West Indies who had nowhere else to go and had to pay extortionate rents for tiny squalid rooms. By 1959, a special police squad was set up to investigate Rachman who by then lived in Hampstead [Upmarket north London area with many Jews] and travelled in a chauffeur-driven Rolls-Royce. Detectives discovered a network of at least 33 Rachman-owned companies controlling his property empire. They also uncovered his sideline, prostitution. Rachman was prosecuted twice for brothel-keeping. ... Another version says The houses had been sub-let and sub-sub-let without our consent, and they were filled with prostitutes, burglars, murderers and negroes.
    Much of this material is more or less mythical, as was the 'land fit for heroes' idea which was part of the mythology of the First World War. The Second World War had reduced the population; and the negro immigrants were provided by Jews. Even the 'National Assistance Act' was timed to coincide with coloured immigration.

Truth About Jews, Finance, and Housing   [ Back to Top ]
We can convincingly fill in many of the blanks. Britain had been bankrupted by WW2, and Jewish and American paper money dominated. Probably Rachman took legal advice from Hampstead Jews, who would use people like Rachman as arms-length intermediaries. The Building Society no doubt worked on the same lines. The identity of thugs and 'winklers' was more or less secret. The police, probably for the first time, were faced with an impossible situation (analogous to that of police faced with Muslim child abuse in the last 30 years or so). Some no doubt were paid, but put themselves in a precarious blackmailable legal position, as they would be made aware that powerful lawyers, and of course Jews in high positions—such as Home Secretaries and Attorney Generals—could prosecute them and publicise them in the Jewish media. As Churchill planned, London had been partly bombed; on the other hand war deaths had cut the population. No doubt this was part of the reason for Jewish backing for immigration; just as it is now. Rents would be paid from public money and borrowing by the government and local authorities.
    It's worth noting the Jewish push for the end of the death penalty, despite the fact that capital punishments were very rare—far fewer than road deaths, for example. And Jews were very keen on the death penalty for Germans. The motivation was probably to make things worse in Britain, to make life easier for thugs, and to remove the death penalty for traitors, though this seems to have had to wait for Blair of the so-called 'Labour Party'.

Oddities in Evidence and Inquiries   [ Back to Top ]
[1] See the page from a 1984 paperback, above right. All three photos have odd features. Tim Evans, described by some as feeble-minded, by others as of average intelligence, and as a good catholic from Wales, who was executed for murder, is shown in an obviously doctored photograph. The photo of Christie is odd; the right side of the jacket, and the surrounding hardware is odd; Christie was not tall, and the head is out of proportion. Evans' wife (with her wedding ring) seems to be intentionally unflattering.
[2] Here's a typical Internet comment: The interesting thing about the case is Ethel and her involvement if any. Those houses in Notting Hill were quite noisy (I had several friends living in such houses in the area in the [19]60s, and flats had not changed much in the post-war years). Any carpeting would be very thin, and it was impossible to move stuff around without everyone hearing - even next door let alone in the same house. But what truly is amazing, is that no-one SMELT the bodies as they decomposed. Murders hidden in domestic settings are usually fairly quickly discovered due to the noxious smell of the corpse.
[3] A 1953 Inquiry, the Scott Henderson Inquiry, HMSO 1953 Cmd. 8896 '... into certain matters arising out of the deaths of Mrs. Beryl Evans and of Geraldine Evens and out of the conviction of Timothy John Evans of the murder of Geraldine Evans'. (A pdf of the original inquiry is downloadable from the Wellcome Institute website: 1953 Scott Henderson Inquiry). (Appendices from p. 20).
    And later, a much longer report The Case of Timothy John Evans, HMSO 1966 Cmnd 3101 is downloadable: 1966 Brabin Report ordered by the Jewish Home Secretary at the time, Frank Soskice.
(NB neither pdf is perfect: tickets, scribbled notes and bookmarks obscure a few parts).
[4] The 'Brabin enquiry exposed police malpractice during the Evans case, such as destruction of evidence' e.g. a necktie. Thus Wikipedia. About ten years later, the police start to get blamed. There are numerous oddities: such as an apparently thorough builders' renovation of the house's back area; body parts which appear to have been overlooked, such as a human femur support, in the back garden (14 by 16 feet), and skeletal remains; signed statements, with assorted inconsistencies. Two bodies were supposed to have been in the garden by 1945.
[5] Other information appeared later, including blacks moving in, and a threat of legal action by Mrs Christie against one of them. I haven't been able to search either of the reports, but my impression is such events are not mentioned in them. The prostitute allegations, dear to the hearts of Jews, seem to be made with little foundation. Black crime has persistently been unreported then, as now, and of course not only in Britain. Black serial killers are unreported; the serial rapist Delroy Grant (see below) is a good example of Jewish media suppression. One of the characters in the drama is described, probably not in the Inquiries, as a 'Jamaican landlord'; I leave it to the readers' judgment whether, under the circumstances of the time, that's a credible description.
[6] There's quite a bit online, which I'll leave to the interested reader. Christie seems to have hoped to be declared insane; he looked forward to being cared for.

[ To big-lies main site | nukelies site | Jews ]
Text, HTML, research, website Rae West first upload 2016-12-12. This version 26-Dec-2019.

Top of Page
C N Parkinson caustic history Marx Wilson   Review of British Socialism and Jewish Influence   Cyril Northcote Parkinson: Left Luggage – A Caustic History of British Socialism from Marx to Wilson

Some suggestive material. By Rerevisionist on 6 June 2015, and 25 Oct 2015
Parkinson had no real idea of the part played by Jews in Britain's history and downfall. He had no idea of the start of the Second World War. For example, he describes Victor Gollancz as a 'humanitarian Jew' - something like the opposite of the truth. Parkinson had little idea about the subversion of socialism by Jews - though his book includes quite acute material on Beatrice and Sidney 'Webb'. He had no idea about Jewish control of money, and with infinite naivete assumes that Gollancz's books were subject to the normal problems of costs that apply to non-Jewish businesses. No doubt Gollancz was subsidised; and no doubt when their usefulness was over, after 1947, 'Left Books' were discreetly dropped. This book is mixed; a stage in the slow processes of revisionism.


Parkinson was observant of everyday fairly obvious factual material, but less so of books and information: if (say) 90% of printed material technology is ultimately owned by Jews, wherever there's a Jewish interest censorship is likely. There's a function which varies with Jewish interest: not much when the subject-matter is beekeeping or bagpipes or pigeon-racing, but very high when looking at eastern Europe, or occidental religion, or money-supply, or 'Jewish' politics. It's easy to miss the constant extreme skewing of printed (and broadcast) material, and the constant injection of Jewish bias.

I put material on the 'Left Book Club' in my big-lies website, as an integral part of Jewish propaganda leading up to WW2. Here's a link directly to 'Left Luggage'. And here's a link to Parkinson on the Webbs; well worth reading. Parkinson appeared not to be Jew-aware, so that frantic claims of 'anti-Semitism' cannot be substantiated.
These extracts are from Chapter 1 of Parkinson's book, Two Nations an interesting piece of rather myopic descriptive scene-setting. Revisionist-minded people will note that Parkinson was unable, or perhaps unwilling, to isolate Jewish influence from British influence. Consider for example the sack of Peking and the earlier conquest of India, and the impoverishment of Britons in several stages—Cromwell and the Bank of England, the Rothschilds after Waterloo, the enclosures. And the technologies of food and building. Parkinson's uncomprehending account of the hesitations in Britain are in bold, below. They bear some relationship to the 'Culture of Critique' in the USA after about 1913.

'.. Most industrial centres were in roundhead country; where manufacturers and methodism went together. Chapels might be colourless but the worshippers filled their minds with drama and light, with visions of a golden heaven and glimpses of a scarlet hell. .. you could drink yourself out on a Saturday night or think yourself out on a Sunday morning. The alcoholic was thus twelve hours ahead. The Methodist had more, however, for his money; for he added to the satisfaction of being 'saved' the happy knowledge that his noisier neighbours were undoubtedly damned. .. the Methodist sermon turned itself into the political oration or the trade union appeal. Common to both was the resentment felt against those who refused to join, the 'blackleg' being the secular equivalent of the unregenerate and the word 'chapel' having a meaning outside the strictly religious context. ..'

'.. Their mistake.. was to suppose that their own immediate fate was the result of deliberate policy. .. The eighteenth century, when the original mistakes had been made, was a tough period in British history; more harsh perhaps than the Middle Ages had ever been. Indifference to individual suffering was partly the result of the external effort being made. With so much at stake—the future for example of America, Australia, Canada and India—little attention was paid to town-planning in Huddersfield or Leeds. There was the same atmosphere in the United States when the westward movement was at its height. Families could perish by the wayside but they were regarded as expendable and probably to blame for their own misfortune. And.. casualties leave something to hand out.. and fewer to share the final spoils. Where we are wrong.. is to see the cotton spinners and coal miners as the only victims.. Men were just as callous in the colonies or at sea. The aristocrats were just as ruthless.. among themselves. When the army is advancing rapidly, the wounded are often left to die. Their chance is sometimes better during a siege or even.. a withdrawal. For one thing, they are more likely to be seen; for another, they may be regarded as valuable. Florence Nightingale's chance at Sevastopol arose from the fact that the campaign had been brought to a standstill. She could have done nothing for Wellington's army at Vittoria and no one would have noticed it if she had. Humanitarianism begins.. after our momentum has been lost. ..'

'.. In British society there were no rigid barriers dividing the nobility from the gentry or the gentry from the middle class. Agriculture was linked with industry and both with commerce. Church and university were linked with politics and both again with law. There was a contrast .. between the southern counties and the coalfields, [Parkinson dates the Industrial Revolution at about 1870] and indeed between Liverpool and Manchester, but all had worked for the same purpose: the defeat of France and the expansion of Britain. .. the diversity of means made the ends attainable. All opposition was overwhelmed by frigates and diplomacy, by textiles and rum. The Duke of Wellington and John Wesley were not only allies but distant relatives. To any given problem the means applied might vary from naval intervention to financial subsidy, from the gospel to gun-running and from trade to war. .. The public schools, a late development, were only a minor factor in the process but they came to symbolize the unity of leadership. .. the aristocrat and the business man, the lawyer and the civil servant, the army officer and the merchantman's captain, had all been to the same sort of school. .. What they did gain.. was a reliance on each other's loyalty and courage. A typical [sic] instrument.. was the East India Company.. the various elements.. knit together fir the intertwined purposes of trade and war. ..'

'The Two Nations of 1845 produced two kinds of history.. the school history .. 'Deeds which Won the Empire'.. all battles from Agincourt to Waterloo. .. from about 1900, the school history which centres upon 'The Life of the Common People'; a lament for proletarian hardships from the Enclosures to the Dole. ..' [Note by rerevisionist: remember that book publication was largely in the hands of rather few rich Jews. Jews controlling the funds of the 'British' Empire were keen on encouraging British 'heroes'. From about 1900, Jews had other aims. Hence, probably, the histories which Parkinson notes, without understanding.]

'.. Cambridge.. Oxford.. people who have read Modern Greats as a preliminary to.. Westminster, Whitehall, Fleet Street or the B.B.C. .. England needs Scotland, Guernsey needs Jersey, Yorkshire needs Lancashire, the Worcester needs the Conway, the Lifeguards need the Horseguards and the detectives need the criminals. ..

'.. Eton.. Harrow.. The idea has come.. to prevail that the alternation of two parties in office is essential to the British system of parliamentary government. .. the British think of politics in terms of cricket. ..'

'The sudden movement of those whose resolve was to escape from the slum gave a powerful support to the general cause of.. Liberalism. But the movement brought.. bitterness.. Leaders who emerged from the slum .. felt a savage resentment.. The portly parson and sporting squire .. investments were in industry of which they saw little but the dividends. .. The idea of the average village having a resident lord of the manor [sic] is purely Victorian and implies a background of industry. In terms of agricultural income it had always taken several manors to support a squire and hundreds to support a Peer of the Realm. .. The best kind of rural [Victorian] landlord was the man whose income came from somewhere else.

'.. Western civilization was triumphant.. Britain's leadership was quite widely accepted. .. institutions models to be copied.. ideas.. in vogue. .. few questioned the value of a classical education. Fewer saw anything amiss with Christianity, or the Bank of England, the Royal Academy or the House of Lords. .. virtually above criticism.. Royal Navy to the National Debt, .. Royal Yacht Squadron to the Jockey Club. Orthodoxy was among the highest virtues.. Quite suddenly.. the mood changed. .. first.. to come under scrutiny was the one most basic to traditional and rural society; the Church of England itself. .. Gothic Revival.. Tractarian Movement.. if the British had been wrong about the Renaissance and the Reformation who was to say that they were right about anything else? .. wavering.. coincided with the publication (in 1848) of the Communist Manifesto . .. momentum had begun to slacken. In another fifty years or so it would be lost.'

Top of Page
John Bean cover   Review of   John Bean   Blood in the Square
Ostara Publications tries a non-revisionist and presumably-new novel, with an outdated model of 'Nationalism'.     Review 18 Feb 2015
Quote: '... the Nationalist characters like Blackwood and the party's war hero chairman, Sir Edric Frampton, winner of a Military Cross against the Germans..'

. . . . I'm afraid Bean belongs to the transitional generation [Bean was 18 in 1945] who still favoured big wars, without understanding who wanted them, and what the results were intended to be. It's an outdated and in fact Jewish-corrupted version of 'nationalism'.

My comment, confident though I haven't read this novel, but read longish extracts online on two sites. Presumably the book is new, though it might have been a dusted-off old piece of writing for all I know. Bean's book was advertised, with a long flattering review by Colin Liddell (Bean's book shows 'great political insight... long career in British nationalism... unrequited love of the British monarchy... predecessor to a second holocaust [sic; in the 1950s and 1960s?] ...') in The Occidental Observer' online, dated February 16th, 2015. The 'Square' in the title is presumably Trafalgar Square, commemorating the victory over Napoleon, but not commemorating the financing of Napoleon by Jews. The extracts in Liddell's review emphasise fights, though this sounds anachronistic to me: part of the Jewish process in the 1930s was to disrupt meetings violently. Bean's book seems intended to prolong the image of 'right wing' violence. Bean contributed to the BNP's 'IDentity' journal in the 2000s, as a 'veteran nationalist', but I fear only to the extend of a few comments on current affairs as reported by the conventional media. He seems to have spend his further education years in the British Navy; as of course many others did. Some went to university under special post-war schemes, but not Bean, as far as I can tell. By the 1970s Martin Webster had already worked out that Jews intended to flood white countries with immigrants, if they could, and that 'Communism' was Jewish. It was becoming clear that the 'Military Intelligence' groups were Jewish, or heavily Jewish. Jewish central bank money manipulations were known, but not by many. CND was characteristic of the time (and anti-Vietnam War demonstrations). As far as I can tell, Bean did nothing, and does nothing, to assist such educational information to emerge. He also seems to have retired just after various movements had been made to fail.
      Oct 2021: Since writing that, I read/ listened more to Liddell, who turns out to be just another purveyor of padding. See my entry in https://big-lies.org/jadar/index.html .
This seems to be the first venture into fiction by Ostara Publications, which is or was Arthur Kemp's imprint of books on race, and related issues, though not I think Jews and their money and activities. I believe the publishing scheme was prompted by his book on white history, March of the Titans. I noticed [added later: this may be wrong; possibly a confusion over the name 'Ostara'] they have started reprinting crime fiction, mostly I think from its 1930s heyday. Possibly some copyrights have been given to Ostara. Anyway; many Ostara books are well worth reading. I like to hope for more analytical material on the world's most serious problem and how to remove it.
[I've just found an online interview, dated November 2012—about the time the BNP had been finished. Bean is reported as saying: 'With Hitler's rise to power in 1933 his actions meant that he had virtually declared war on the Jewish people. It is therefore understandable that Jewish money and its reflected power in the media should be harnessed with the militancy of the communists to not only bring down Hitler and his National Socialism, which Fascism had morphed into, but also any party that expressed sympathy towards any aspect of his policies. This included the BUF. Hitler's intransigence meant that there was no turning back, that war was inevitable, and that Mosley's BUF could not survive.' Nothing on USSR, the Fed, Jews in Germany and Hungary. It's clear Bean preferred world war and widespread ruin to reduction in Jewish money power and their other frauds: he thought worldwide devastation was justified, so that Jews could continue to defraud. Bean probably did as much damage to Britain's nationalist movement as any other single person. Quite possibly, in view of a remark of his online, that he was from an impoverished background, and in view of his ridiculous name, Bean may have been yet another crypto-Jew.

Top of Page
image   Review of religious history british empire   Charles Allen: The Buddha and the Sahibs: The Men Who Discovered India's Lost Religion

Misleading title is an irritant, 8 Jun 2009

'Men who discovered India's lost religion'—Buddhism was invented but then declined in quite a short space of time, supplanted or weakened—by Hinduism or invasions—and later by Islam. Somehow however it migrated across Tibet and to China and elsewhere.

'Six generations of his [Charles Allen's] family served under the British Raj.' I think all of this book apart from introductory and summary chapters is biographical, often including several men who worked together, or travelled together, or happened to meet. The bibliography lists many 19th century books, the authors of some of them being the subjects of chapters. It wouldn't surprise me if he has a personal library, though the 'Oriental and India Office Collection' at the British Library, and Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 1788-1848 loom large too.

India's 'lost religion' was not, in fact, lost. The men listed here did astounding work in languages (Pali, Sanskrit, Tibetan)—there are analogues to the Rosetta stone—and translations (they 'discovered' many works in those languages, typically in monasteries). They excavated what often turned out to be Buddhist monuments—stupas/stopes, robbed-out monuments, man made caves, Ashokan pillars, the remains of huge towns. They made maps, for example of Benares. But everywhere they were helped and assisted—Buddhism existed but the technically-advanced ability of whites to travel permitted them to explore comparative versions of Buddhism. The men who carried out these activities are the subject of the book. The Buddha is not such a large part as the title suggests. There is a lot of local colour—accounts of battles for example, as often between local groups (Gorkhas, Mauryas, Sikhs..) as the British.

The problem I found is that to extract a thread of Buddhism is very difficult—the author is like a raconteur with an agonisingly precise memory of detail that isn't immediately relevant to the topic. In fact the book's structure, with some plates in pre-photographic form, and some of structures long ago demolished, mirrors the jumbled chaos of an archaeological site, where the newcomer is faced with the task of piecing together what happened.

Another irritant is what I take to be the author's lack of empathy with the past. Thus, a huge piece of land reported to have had stupas or stopes as far as the eye could see, have been flattened as a result of war. (Imagine Salisbury Plain's monuments all crushed). Sundry—generally Muslim—invaders pulverised and smashed many monuments. Charles Allen dislikes such behaviour when it's the Chinese in Tibet, but lightly passes over it in India. The same comment is true when he discusses invasions and massacres. This is of course his stylistic choice, but it removes an important signpost for the reader, since close reading is needed to check whether an account describes something small, or huge devastation.

Top of Page
image   Review of Historical revisionism   Frances Wood: Did Marco Polo Go to China?

Interesting richly-detailed 'revisionist' text., 6 Jun 2009

I see this is only the second review in Amazon for about eight years!

The other reviewer felt unable to give five stars; in fact, I agree with him/her, but nevertheless give five on the grounds that the book will appeal to anyone interested in revisionism as an activity. The Description of the World, probably dictated by Marco Polo, of Venice, or edited down from his raconteur-style conversation, is believed to have been written in 1298. This is remote enough from us to cut out the biasing effect of modern self- and group-interests. Apart from specialist academics that is—German Mongolists are cited as an example of sceptics about Marco Polo.

The author is/was Head of the Chinese Department at the British Library. She therefore must have/have had access to manuscripts of the most varied type. She seems to have worked at least twenty years on this topic, so her views deserve considerable respect.

The book reminds me slightly of Arthur Koestler on the 'Thirteenth Tribe'. It's a similar account: Turkic languages, Persia, Mongols, silk and other exotic materials, towns with what seem incredibly large populations for the time, paper money as a novelty, mountain ranges and deserts, remote battles and invasions. In what may be an artefact of a scholarly life, or may be a fact based on the absence of modern highly dangerous weaponry, life then in central and east Asia seems relatively amiable and danger-free, at least when Mongol and other hordes were in abeyance. Camel trains of traders, walled cities, religions and princes restrained by the inability to do much damage, the fact that some goods were essential, and others prized by people disinclined by wealth to haggle or exploit overmuch—the whole picture is attractive. It struck me however that Marco Polo's motives could have been explored—it's left unclear whether fame or money could be extracted from books before the advent of printing.

'FirstClassSkeptic' wondered if the book had a propagandist element, for example in suggesting that official paper or silk money should be accepted.

From a revisionist perspective, the book is primarily an example of documentary analysis, including historiography, of course with a large geographical component. I won't describe her conclusions—and I wonder if she would revise her own views now—on the principle of not announcing sporting results before the game is rebroadcast. Very good and recommended also as a mind-expander—it's not only the future that is uncertain.

[Channel 4 made a documentary—'Silk Road'—on this topic; no doubt some intrepid programme commissioner decided on this. There seem to be quite a few other TV series with very similar titles.]

Top of Page
Nicholas Ennos (I presume) with his book Jane Austen - a new revelation Nicholas Ennos: Jane Austen - a new revelation

I first heard about this book in a comment to a 'Youtube' video, which was online; Youtube is a more or less obsolete site, run by unintelligent Jews. Nicholas' comment was made to a talk by Burford on the Shakespeare authorship problem which I'd recorded.

Smallish format (6" x 9") hardback, approaching 400 pages. Published in 2013, not 2014, by what appears to be a now-dissolved Manchester company. Formidable bibliography. The title on the jacket (including some lower-case lettering) is hard to discern from the cover painting; possibly intentionally - the hardback itself has clear gold lettering on red. The computer typesetting allows free use of italics, and bold characters - useful in examining dedications and epitaphs, though the indexing style for my taste is subtly wrong, indenting the wrong way round. In fact, not inappropriately, the name 'de Feullide, Eliza' is somewhat hidden.

Nicholas Ennos studied modern languages (and allows himself a scathing paragraph on the absurdly low standard of language teaching in Britain - I hope he's wrong, but fear he's right). He has competence in Latin (a chapter compares Tacitus's style with, for example, Goldsmith's History of England, pilloried by the real Austen).
      On the subject of languages, it's as well to be reminded of some etymologies and origins. 'Fortunate', for example, obviously is related to 'fortunes' in the personal sense. Judging by Warren Hastings' activities, 'godfather' suggests a Biblical interpretation. The 'fishing fleet' of white women in India leaves a flavour of vanished sailing ships. Elizabeth took some lessons from an Accomptant.

The book is arranged, in my view very well, in bite-size chapters, somewhat independent of each other; perhaps he wrote his book in folders of topics. Where there is repetition, it's because of this structure.

The single longest chapter is 4 The Life of Eliza Hancock, which includes a marriage to a French "comte", who, though wealthy, was not all that wealthy, and seemed to have his eye on her money, with which to improve a beautiful but remote and boggy part of France. Mr Hancock may have been infertile; Warren Hastings being suggested, with evidence, as the father. Ennos has difficulties with Hastings' character, not surprisingly, of course. My personal best guess is that Jews profited from the opium 'trade', and offloaded as much as possible of the opprobrium onto British officials, including of course Hastings. Ennos (qualified as a solicitor) has a good eye for trustees, marriage laws, baronetcies as a royal money-maker, tax evasion by Warren Hastings, wills. Unfortunately Eliza herself is not illustrated (for portrait copyright reasons), but represented only by her grave slab (St John at Hampstead, though 'Wikipedia' doesn't list her as someone of interest).

Update: 25 Feb 2021

Ennos' book was published by Senesino Books, Sackville Street, Manchester, a company apparently dissolved in 2016. (The name Senesino must refer to Ennos' musical interest). Internet views of Speedyhen (book distributors, including his brothers' books), Quora, and a firm of solicitors weren't helpful. I fear his book may have sunk, though I hope not. May I point out that print-on-demand has been established for years, and so has the e-book technology. So a cheap paperback, and even cheaper e-books, are very feasible! Come on, Nick—you can't be that interested in conveyancing &cc! Think of schoolkids and the future. Though you may need a warning paragraph, to the effect that elderly teachers can love their mistakes, and may need to be handled carefully.

Allow me to mention a few cautionary remarks on the oeuvre of Eliza. He early works may include titles attributed to Fanny Burney, Camilla and Evalina. her later works may include Elizabeth Hamilton's Translations of the Letters of a Hindoo Rajah, in the style of Persian Letters. And Elizabeth Hamilton's Memoirs of Modern Philosophers. Ennos considers (from its non-Scottish story) that Ivanhoe may be Eliza's.

But Walter Scott, on the French Revolution, considers that Jews played a large part. As far as I know, there is nothing of this in Eliza. It's possible that Hastings may have been crypto-Jewish. The post-Napoleonic war events, with the Rothschild money-making scheme, so far as I know, is also missing from Eliza. Her involvement seems to have been relief—that her French husband liberated her, by being guillotined.
      Warren Hastings never seems to have recognised her link to him; though at least he gave her a fortune. Ennos thinks Hastings was wary of establishing an inherited connection.
      Eliza Hancock/de Feuillide: Calcutta 1761-1813 London R I P. Perhaps she could have devoted more time to the primitive writings of so-called 'Semites'. To this day, the northern Europe/Greek/Latin nexus remains separated from the primitively simple, but also semantically parasitical, eastern influence.

3 Feb 2021: Note on another view of Jane Austen:

Miles Mathis' website has a piece Jane Austen: Social Engineer?   By Anon, Nov 23, 2020. That pdf document doesn't attack the authorship issue, but looks at the books as carrying the message that rich and influential men are nice guys, not unpleasant men carrying out disgusting but profitable deeds.

Specimen: Pride and Prejudice has taught many generations of impressionable young women not only that the man representing Christianity the most is an idiot, but also that they should marry a man who, for all intents and purposes, might as well be a mythical creature to them, and to disdain other bachelors, i.e., everyone.

The two best parts for most readers I'd guess are (1) the family connections surrounding Jane Austen (clergyman father skilled in Greek/Latin, but impoverished, Philadelphia Austen and the 'fishing fleet' in India, Henry Austen (brother) the failed banker who married Eliza ... morphing into Warren Hastings and matters in India And (2) literary matters: letters, authoresses, incidents from real life (or not), pseudonyms, names which become or are made famous. The sections on destruction of letters, largely by Cassandra, remind me of the destruction of Alfred Russel Wallace's letters to Darwin. Nicholas Ennos has in effect three introductions, the third outlining his reasons for investigating Jane Austen (italicised; the genuine author).

Musing over some online writings by Miles W Mathis, on New York hotels and landowners and the aristocracies of England and Scotland as transposed into the Americas, it occurred to me that without Eliza's bastardy, her literary works would not have existed; and we would have as little idea of the realities of the lives of such people as American 'Janeites' do now.

My guess is that Ennos will become as well-known as Thomas Looney, of de Vere fame. But path-breaking is difficult. Ennos has an 'Apology', a translation, I presume his, from Gottfried von Straßburg, saying he liked other works, which were well-written, attractive, sincere—but untrue. I wonder if Ennos means it.

My only reservation, which perhaps would not interest many people, is the greater world: 1815 and the Rothschild money grab was bang in the middle of the Jane Austen novels, and might have been considered important. Warren Hastings (and Islam) and the French Revolution (and Walter Scott?) could do with a shot of revisionism. So can the past: the 18th century as post-(((Bank Of England))) takeover, spawning Mills and Boon tales.
RW 30 Dec 2017

The idea that Jane Austen may have been poisoned with arsenic surfaced in 2011 (or was popularised then). Ennos's book does not consider the idea. However, he has an online comment posted after his book was published:

Jane Austen's cousin, and sister in law, Eliza de Feuilide, was the author of the novels and not Jane, as I prove in my book "Jane Austen - a New Revelation".

The medical evidence tends to show that Jane Austen was killed by arsenic poisoning which must have been administered by members of her family. Her blotchy skin was consistent with arsenic poisoning and a lock of her hair was tested by its owners in the last century and found to contain arsenic. This was consistent with the Austen family cover up of Eliza's authorship of the novels. A letter of Jane Austen's dated 29 January 1813 proves that all of the novels had been written by this date, as it gives the prices to be charged for each and confirms that they had been completed. Eliza died in April 1813. The letter of January 1813 shows that there were three completed novels that remained to be published: Mansfield Park, Emma and Persuasion. In addition, in 1815 or 1816 Henry Austen bought back the copyright of Northanger Abbey from the publishers. Jane Austen travelled to London and together with Henry Austen organised the publication of these last four novels from 1813 to 1817. By 1817 it was no longer necessary for Jane Austen to be kept alive and her existence might prove an embarrassment for people investigating the authorship of the novels.

The person who probably administered the arsenic would have been Cassandra Austen, her sister, who lived with her. Cassandra falsified a chronology of when each of the novels was written, showing that the last few were written after Eliza's death. As I have mentioned, Jane Austen's letter of 29 January 1813 shows that this chronology was false and therefore Cassandra was intimately involved in the cover up of Eliza's authorship. Cassandra also destroyed 90 per cent of Jane Austen's letters to expunge any evidence of Eliza's authorship. However, she was not clever enough to destroy the letter of 29 January 1813 which is the "smoking gun" which proves Eliza's authorship of the novels.

There's a certain horrifying fascination in reading comments by women on Jane Austen. I wonder if whites are genetically inclined to live in, or at least imagine they are in, fantasies and dreamworlds. Perhaps it's something to do with long dark nights in northern Europe: hobbies, obsessions, indoor activities, repetitions, survival necessities for some, escapism for others. I couldn't find a single Internet comment from a woman interested in Nicholas Ennos's book. They all seemed to like, or say they liked, the breathy nothingness of Lucy Worsley and the (((British))) Broadcasting Corpse. The ones who weren't impressed disliked Worsley, not her weak presentation.
Nicholas Ennos 31 Dec 2017
It is interesting that you mention Jews and the French Revolution. In my book I mention Eliza Hamilton being another of the noms de plume of Eliza de Feuillide. In Hamilton's books she is extremely anti Jacobin. The Jacobins were basically illuminated Freemasonry who were behind the French Revolution. They were ultimately controlled by the Rothschilds. Eliza de Feuillide was married to a French nobleman executed in the French Revolution. She also had aristocratic friends in France. As such it seems she belonged to a different wing of Freemasonry. It is likely that she belonged to the Mopsorden, or Order of the Pug, a quasi Masonic order open to women and Catholics. Women belonging to the order owned pug dogs, as Eliza did. Parts of Jane Austen novels contain hidden references to Freemasonry. Her father Warren Hastings started the sale of opium to China, a trade in which the Jews were to be heavily involved. However, he was strongly against slavery, another trade dominated by Jews.
    One thing I did not mention in my book as it is purely speculative, is Eliza de Feuillide's possible authorship of some of the Walter Scott novels, in particular Ivanhoe. Eliza was deeply interested in history and it would have been strange if she had not attempted to write historical novels. The author of Ivanhoe seems to be English, as it deals with the conflict between Saxons and Normans, which never happened in Scotland. From the accurate portrayal of the female characters and the style of writing the author also appears to be a woman. The introduction to Ivanhoe also states that the writer is using a pseudonym and is more famous for novels in other genres. In Ivanhoe one of the heroes is a Jew and his daughter Rowena. So it seems that Eliza was deceived about Jews and did not make the connection between them and the Jacobins.

Rerevisionist
Terrific. Thanks. My Scott mention was really to his history of the Fr Rev, which is I think available now on Internet - of course he preceded Nesta Webster. But it hadn't occurred to be Scott might have been ghosted, if that's the right word for the connection. Interesting.
    .... Do you think Eliza felt it a step down to marry into the Austens? Just curious.
    .... Just curious if you are/were Hungarian - not many books have a prefatory Hungarian poem.

Nicholas Ennos
Thank you for your kind review. I had expected to sell more copies of my book but I look on it as an ongoing project. I have a lot of other things going on in my life as well. I think I was very surprised just how much even educated people are trapped in the matrix and are terrified that things are not what they seem, it seems to threaten their whole reason for living. I am afraid I did not understand what you meant about putting comments on Amazon but would be happy for you to do this.
    I have reviewed biographies of Jane Austen on Amazon. The latest one was dreadful as in addition to the content Lucy Worsley does not know how to write, she just writes as if she is talking. I am very old fashioned as I was educated at a top grammar school in the 1970s and so I can see how woefully low education standards are now.
    I am a great Hungarophile as I love Budapest and the Hungarian language which I am trying to learn.
    One thing I discovered which might interest you is that I renovated a flat there and my builder was a Serb from Novi Sad. When he spoke English his accent was identical to that of Elie Wiesel who claimed to be a Hungarian-speaking Romanian. The Hungarians speak with a totally different accent. I also found on the internet an entry card of Wiesel's into France (with his photo but no name) from the Yugoslav embassy. So he was just a complete fraud and took the identity of someone else but he got the Nobel Prize and his book Night was heavily promoted by the Holohoax industry.
    Eliza was the cousin of Henry Austen and 10 years older and she had flirted with him when she was younger. She had hoped to find a richer husband but she sort of forced him to become a banker which in the end led to him becoming bankrupt.


Top of Page

image   Review of Shakespeare/ de Vere Controversy   J T Looney: Shakespeare Identified

Pioneering revisionist Shakespeare work, with surprising implications, June 24, 2011

Looney's double-o is for emphasis, in some languages, e.g. Dutch, as in 'brooch'—everyone points out he isn't pronounced to rhyme with 'loony'. This book was published in 1920, after some years' work. It's not the first alternative authorship book: in 1910 for example a Baconian work was published. Looney is always described as a schoolmaster or teacher in Gateshead (a town on the other side of the Tyne from Newcastle), though so far as I know, no school in the area claims him.

Looney's method was to comb the plays for clues as to character, then comb what's known of the Elizabethan world for a person to match, detective fashion. It would be inaccurate to state that controversy raged thereafter. He was largely ignored and shrugged off. But he must have made a bit of impact, since one volume of Galsworthy's Forsyte Saga mentions the theory.

This book therefore has some historical significance. Just a few notes:
[1] It's a tremendous proving-ground for theories of revisionism. Every possible attitude—derision, contempt, accusations of ignorance, etc—and every possible style of counter-argument—pulling of rank, ridicule, concentration on trivia etc—has been used against Looney, and, for that matter, by his supporters when on the defensive.
[2] In principle, deletion of the 'Stratford man' (probably an illiterate war profiteer in food) should allow a far better appreciation of the Elizabethan period. This means historians would have to do some hard work, however. (One edition of this book included an excellent description by Capt. Ward of England as engaged in a war with Spain, comparable with the First World War, and far removed from the ahistorical merrie England stereotype of for example 'Shakespeare in Love').
[3] What does it matter?—Well, there's an effect on educational theory. Occasionally , educators look at the real world, and even more occasionally, at genius. Their view of 'Shakespeare' therefore is of some importance. If the traditional story is correct, genius can appear anywhere, even to someone of little education, who is thought to be able to deduce almost everything about the world. But if Looney is right, education is of paramount importance. Present-day acceptance of poor educational standards therefore owes something to the 'Shakespeare' myth.
________________

I haven't seen this paperback, which I assume is a straight reprint of the 1920 book, 1920 typography and all.

Looney struck lucky—on his quest he found just one single published poem by Oxford, 'Women', which conformed to his checklist of characteristics. This was the clue which he followed up relentlessly.

There's a two volume American edition of 1975, edited by Ruth Lloyd Miller, which of course has added material—including a good piece by a Captain Ward, pointing out that there was war with Spain at the time and that as a result there was widespread poverty, famine, and high food prices. The 'merrie England' stuff as in 'Shakespeare in Love' is fantasy. Miller's volumes are lavishly produced with may monochrome and colour reproductions of portraits etc.

However; I do have something of a warning. De Vere put his own life story into his plays and sonnets. As you come to understand 'Shakespeare' it becomes clear that de Vere was an aristocrat obsessed by his own sidelining—he was a monstrous egotist. His work describes Elizabeth's court with unsparing accuracy, but beneath it all is an aristocratic world view with no room for the masses—unless they are amusing writer/actor types.

A further point: the 'Shakspere' mythology has been guarded by a ridiculous corps of professional careerists. To this date, this still applies, though possibly the USA is shedding this absurd skin more successfully that Britain. However, a similar pattern is appearing amongst the Oxfordians, who have their own ring of paid journals and publications and speakers. I tried to get a 50 minute speech by Burford/Beauclerk on Youtube, to help diffuse the message more widely. He didn't want it up there, possibly on copyright grounds, or because he considered it lacklustre, though in my view it was an excellent introductory overview. Most of the content was Looney, paraphased.
Here's a 6-part talk presenting the Oxfordian case; right-click to watch:--

Burford in 1994 Edward de Vere as Shakespeare

Top of Page
image   Review of Long, detailed, intelligent, American work on the Shakespeare controversy   Charlton Ogburn: The Mysterious William Shakespeare

Second major work on de Vere as Shakespeare, 4 Oct 2010

The first being by John Thomas Looney (1920).

Charlton Ogburn (the blurb states) started work on 'The Mystery of William Shakespeare' aged about 66, after reviewing books, working in the army and military intelligence during the Second World War, drafting intelligence estimates, and writing on foreign policy, war, and science. And fiction. The hardback was published in 1984; the paperback was first published in 1988 by Cardinal, a branch of Sphere, itself a branch of Penguin—I think—and is an abridged version—though how abridged isn't entirely clear.

Indispensable as a hefty and entirely convincing work, relying on conventional works on 'Shakespeare', books dealing with related topics—the Cecils, the Elizabethan Age, Euphuism and other stylistic matters, Spain, Italy, sea voyages of the time, law, heraldry etc etc, various editions of folios, sonnets... the detail is impressive.

In effect the book has three parts—demolition of the case for the Stratford man; biography of de Vere—his money, houses, financial strains, travels, life in the court of Elizabeth; and the interplay between the life of de Vere and his once-every-six-months plays. There is or was a fashion for describing Shakespeare as 'arse-achingly boring', which may be true enough for anyone trying to make sense of the works without understanding the background. Conversely, many defenders of the works aren't convincing, since they have no idea what great tracts of the plays mean.

Recommended! The 1988 paperback is available on the 'used' market; I don't think there's been a subsequent printing.

Top of Page
Captain Cook Myth book   Review of Jewish interest   Jillian Robertson: The Captain Cook Myth

Revisionism of Capt. Cook and Australia, June 28, 2010

By an Australian woman journalist living (then?) in England. Her conclusion on Captain Cook: '.. glorification.. in Australia has something to it of the irony of Anzac Day, .. horrendously mismanaged debacle. ..'

'.. Cook.. wasn't interested in Australia, and had small faith in its possibilities. His achievement lies.. in what he took away: Terra Australis Incognita. What Australia owes to its "discoverer"—the continent's fifth? tenth? fifteenth?—has been greatly exaggerated. He charted Australia from Cape Everard to Torres Strait and he did it well. That is all.'

- Includes much interesting stuff, e.g. centres of map-making, international rivalry, Cook's ambition, his use (probably) of other people's maps and even place names from e.g. French, his supposed house in England which seems a fraud, supposed tree in Australia at which his ship was falsely supposed tied, his wife's destroying all his papers, doubt what he was really like (as journals were all examined), etc etc.

Top of Page
Jewish propaganda   Review of Jews and Development and Otherwise of Countries   C R Hensman: Rich Against Poor - The Reality of Aid

1971 Pelican Paperback - Just One Specimen of Mass-Produced Jewish Propaganda
Review uploaded 11 Oct 2015 © 'Rerevisionist'
I've surveyed this book in my section on Jews. I don't wish to claim the book is special in any way; they were huge numbers of similar titles, by similar writers, and with similar characteristics. It's important for anyone wishing to understand the world to get a feel for Jewish propaganda, because it is so ubiquitous and so thoroughly interested solely in Jews, to the exclusion of all other people.

Jews won the Second World War 70 years ago. It's of some importance to check the truth against the claims and boasts of the vast number of post-war brightly-coloured Jewish paperbacks.

The first investigation might be into wars. The ZOG-run USA has bases dotted around the world, and has had many wars; Jews have made fortunes from these, and from science frauds, and of course from the 'Holocaust' fraud. The claims of seeking freedom and peace are clear failures.

'Development' is another topic of great importance. An obvious thing to do is to check on mal-investment and waste. The African 'groundnuts' scheme of the 1950s, with its slogan about fats, now almost forgotten, is worth a visit. So are buildings in the wrong place, or unworkable for some reason: Brasilia and, now, entire Chinese cities illustrate some of this. Roads to nowhere had historical precedents in railways running in huge loops, designed to put costs up. So are ecological errors: silted-up dams, insecticide-infested country, and inappropriate technology are fertile fields. Medical scams and errors are another, for example the 'AIDS' fraud. Many people by now have noted that (for example) Pakistan and India have been independent for more than sixty years; yet there has been little improvement. Much of Africa is nominally independent, and yet of course hopelessly untechnical and with no real sign of any progress, even in local, appropriate techniques. Charities have made themselves into a new, expanding area for money-making; so has the 'European Union'. These markers help to assess post-1945 books, and university departments, and whether supposed theories and models of development were ever intended to be serious.

Certainly the population control measures discussed so often about whites in the 1960s seem to have been largely forgotten, probably because of the unspoken Jewish plan to flood white countries with high-unemployment aliens.

Top of Page
Metapedia   Review of Online Encyclopedia using Wikipedia Software and ConventionsPromising Jew-Aware Reference Site

Metapedia - Same Software as Wikipedia, but Race and Jew Aware - January 18, 2014

THIS IS LIKELY TO BE OUTDATED!
Metapedia (.org, not .com), is a promising online site, using (I think) the same software as Wikipedia. The prefix 'meta' is chosen to indicate that it's outside or above or opposite the 'mainstream' media. It may (for all I know) be a riposte to Barbara Spectre's 'Paideia' in Sweden. (NB anton.pdf in Miles Mathis mentions an uncredited university Paideia University in California). At the time I write, Metapedia's index page list sixteen language editions, all European. The numbers of articles in each language vary widely: Magyar has more than the others put together; German, English, Swedish, and Spanish follow. This suggests the editors may have been Hungarian, perhaps in Jobbik, but I could find no information about the planners or the contributors.

Click on the language to find the corresponding subsite of metapedia, for example en.metapedia.org, the English language subsite.

If you wish to find Jew-aware information on any person or organisation, try Googling - for example, googling 'metapedia rerevisionist' finds my entry.

The English and American entries are intended to counter the 'strongly biased and hostile "researchers" like Searchlight, Anti-Defamation League, Southern Poverty Law Center, Simon Wiesenthal Centre ..' As yet the content is variable; use the 'search' box to hunt for people and topics. There's a very detailed article on Carleton Coon and his race ideas. 'Martin Gilbert' produces one critical short article (22 million Jewish deaths??); David Irving has a large, but not huge, entry; the Federal Reserve entry is good and detailed; the New York Times entry is mostly historical, not covering post-1945 policies well. On the other hand, Lyndon Johnson is under-researched (Jewish? Intentional damage to blacks? Vietnam War a Jewish money-making scheme?); there's nothing on Larry Silverstein (though the entry for the Jewish judge who awarded him money for the WTC is long); the Bertrand Russell entry doesn't know about his Jewish contacts; there's nothing on Muslim massacres in the Hindu Kush; searching on 'US bases' yields nothing; there isn't much on Lindbergh, though his 1941 Iowa speech is quoted.

Worth bookmarking or remembering. I hope it will increase in quality and quantity. And it may be a valuable resource for Europeans in researching into the histories of countries foreign to them—mythologies, national heroes, views and facts on invasions and conquests. British people know little of the histories of (say) Poland, Finland, modern Greece, Germany, Hungary ... and although machine translations aren't (yet) available (the page URL with minimal effort needs to be pasted into Google translate), this may prove a valuable feature. Each language has its own articles; there seems to be no systematic translation between them. [German metapedia entries on Hitler and Stalin, 'probably the worst criminal in human history', were here.] The Swedish branch of this site, sv.metapedia.org, includes Barbara Spectre (who believe it or not, 'is one of the initiators of the lobby group One Sweden'). I test-drove the Hungarian branch hu.metapedia.org but was a bit disappointed not to find much on Dracul, Vlad the Impaler, the terror (I take it) of Islam. There is no Russian edition; a link to 'WikiSlavia in Russia' doesn't work, but its site volgota.com exists. 2006-2009 was the period of maximum addition of new languages. Possibly the site is growing; possibly it has stalled; possibly it awaits some multi-alphabet interface.
Important Addendum June 2017 This site had some sort of internal takeover, and disappointingly has declined. I can't recommend it. A new rightpedia.org may prove better.

Top of Page
Cobain Cruel Britannia Jews Portobello Books   Review of   Ian Cobain   Cruel Britannia
The point of this book is to direct attention from Jewish cruelty and frauds.     Review 19 Feb 2015
Cruel Britannia appears to have been published in 2012. Published by Portobello Books. Ian Cobain is described as 'a senior journalist at The Guardian', in a Daily Telegraph review. Without going into detail, the point of this book is, as always with Jewish publications, to deflect attention away from Jews. Many people by now must have understood that the Second World War was a Jewish operation, and that Nuremberg was a festival for Jewish torturers who lived in the USA. This of course is not a view in the Jewish media, such as the Guardian. Cobain's book, on for example Bad Nenndorf and 'The Cage' (described as being 'near Kensington'), is designed to offload the burden onto horrid whites. If the 'dirty tricks' files of Churchill and others are ever opened, and if serious history and journalism survive, maybe the true story will finally emerge.
Added May 2016: favourable comment in CODOH: In 2012, however, the fact that CSDIC tortured German prisoners and compelled them to sign false confessions became quite well known, with the appearance of Ian Cobain’s Cruel Britannia: A Secret History of Torture. Although Cobain does not specifically mention Aumeier [who was tortured and hanged], the book gives a general idea of what happened in the London Cage...'

Top of Page

Alfred Russel Wallace: Inventor of the Theory of Evolution.
A Delicate Arrangement: the Strange Case of Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace
Notes on Arnold Backman's book © Rae West 1997, 2014

Amazon review of Brackman's book, below
Timeline of events: Wallace, Darwin, Bates and others
More Notes on 'A Delicate Arrangement' to try to establish Darwin's precedence

Related sites: big-lies.org     nukelies.org

Review of Brackman's Strange Case of Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace

imageScience fraud, Scientific Priority, Creativity, and History.
Arnold C. Brackman: A Delicate Arrangement: The Strange Case of Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace
Brackman 5 stars First-rate history-of-science detective story but with some flaws, November 27, 2010

[Amazon review] By Rerevisionist (Manchester, England)
Tags: Arnold C Brackman, Alfred Russel Wallace, Bates, Amazon, Indonesia, Lyell, Hooker, Darwin, Wallace line, New Guinea, Timor, selection

Brackman was an academic of some sort (West Connecticut State College) who wrote on topics including Nineveh, Tutankhamen (as it was then spelt), Troy, Japanese WW2 War Crimes trials (latter book 1987). He appears to have been married to Aggie, from Surinam, in south America, which I think led to his interest in the Amazon, where Bates the zoologist explored. Brackman was also some sort of correspondent, I think for Time/Life, in the Straits area, where he heard of the 'Wallace Line' just after the Second World War, many years before becoming professionally involved. His author's note at the end gives some details of his methodology. He was published by a Time/Life subsidiary.

This book is a reconstruction of the discovery of the theory of evolution. Wallace was an explorer along the lines of Bates 'of the Amazons'. Note that Darwin and T H Huxley were explorers too. Travel by biologists—accustomed to detailed and microscopic examination of specimens—was an important element in discovering evolution, because whole ecological systems thrust themselves on their attention. (Huxley, who went to Antarctica, may have felt he'd drawn the short straw!)

In brief, Wallace, in the then Dutch East Indies, wrote papers and letters, for example on the 'succession of species', in the 1850s, to Darwin and others. In 1858 (ill with malaria) Wallace wrote the first complete exposition of descent and diversification through variation and natural selection. On 9 March, 1858 he posted his letter to Darwin, which Brackman estimates to have arrived by 4 June, 1858. The theory of evolution was announced publically on July 1st, the meeting having been brought forward from 17th. The Linnaean Society must have panicked, as Wallace might have sent the same material elsewhere. Darwin, Hooker, and Lyell rigged up the 'joint paper' meeting. From this time forward mythology of Darwin's priority was nurtured: letters and diary entries were missing, for example. The process continued for decades. Wallace himself believed the story, though with increasing doubts, as for example volumes of letters were published, but with gaps where letters had supposedly been destroyed.

This book is in three parts—it is essentially three sub-books—
1 The arrival of Wallace's letters to Darwin;
2 early lives and work of both Wallace and Bates in 'the Green Infernos';
3 the nobility of character of Wallace.
Brackman surveys other sceptics on Darwin's life—J L Brooks, Stauffer, Haughton—but none seem to have taken Brackman's uncompromising stand. The famous portrait of Darwin with a long beard, possibly steeped in gloom, is interpreted by Brackman as evidence that Darwin felt guilt for the rest of his life. There is abundant detail in Brackman, but it is unsummarised; I made my own chronology from 1776 (Malay archipelago, 1809 (Lamarck's theory), 1813? (first mentions of the ideas of natural selection and survival of the fittest, latter phrase from Herbert Spencer), 1823 Wallace's birth—right through to 1980, the year of publication.

So what? There are several lessons—one being the establishment reaction. Darwin was rich, Wallace struggled all his life. The 'Labor Party' was founded in 1901; aristocrats liked to think one of their number had achieved something of intellectual value (even though it's difficult to believe they'd have had anything to do with barnacles, 'worm stones', and the rest). Educators looked on Darwin as a genius, overlooking the part played by investigative work. (There's a strange parallel with the real Shakespeare—Wallace's ancestry contains a 'Vere'; is it possible he was related to the real Shakespeare?)

The book is a bit marred by Americanisms which don't sit very well in an English-topic book. 'Skim ice', 'Wallace lucked out', 'Darwinism ran 494 pages', 'Labor Party' illustrate the sort of thing. He confuses 'disinterest' with 'uninterest', doesn't know 'windfall' refers to fruit blown from trees, calls Lancelot Hogben a 'controversial historian', hasn't heard of Peacock's oran utan Monboddo character 'Lord Oran Haut-Ton'. There are some misprints ('dumfounded') and a few conflicting publication dates. He always says 'Utopian' of socialism. A comment attributes to Wallace a view ascribed widely to Bakunin.

However, this is an important book, in its way resembling Looney's work on the Earl of Oxford. Here's a sketchy chronology taken from the book (with page numbers) which may be helpful:---


Timeline of events taken from Brackman's book: Wallace, Darwin, Bates and others

  1776 Sonnerat (French) 1st naturalist to study Malay archipelago 167
  1809 Lamarck's theory: simplest gave rise to others; + acq chars 29
  1813? William Wells at Royal Soc has a nat selection & s fittest 75
  1818 Thomas Vere Wallace & Mary Anne move with 6 kids to Usk 100
  Jan 8 1823 Birth of Alfred Russel Wallace 100
  1831 Darwin a corresponding member of Zoological Society 13
  1831 Patrick Matthew in obscure book on naval timber on surv fit 75
  1832 Lyell's Principles of Geology gives incredibly long history 30
  1833 Lyell's Principles of Geology (sic; both dates given by Brackman) 124
  1835 Darwin dedicates Voyage of the Beagle to Lyell (? see below) 33
  1835 First monograph of Edward Blyth (in Mag of Nat Hist?) 37
  1837 Darwin 'opens the first page of his species notebook' 13
  Species notebook conceives of 'tree of nature' 51
  Wallace shipped off to Baton-by-the-Sea to learn surveying 108
  1839 Asa Gray, American botanist, visits England for 1st time 52
  1839 'Illustrations of British Insects' by James Francis Stephen 118
  1839 'Voyage of the Beagle' published 119
  Early 1840s D theory of artificial selection/ nothing on divergence 12
  1840s D had "natural selection" mechanism; but not divergence 15
  1841 Blyth leaves for India, having published in Mag of Nat Hist 37
  1841 W buys a shilling paperback (sic) on botany; 'stunned' 110
  1841? W buys John Lindley's 'Elements of Botany'; nothing geographical 111
  1841? W borrows London's 'Encyclopaedia of Plants', copies info 111
  1842 D copies arguments by Blyth in essays... 37
  June 1842 D claimed 'very brief extract of my theory in 35 pages' 18
  3 Jan 1843 Bates short piece on Coleoptera in damp places in Zoologist 117
  1843 W's father died; 'destitute family scattered' 114
  1843 W tries 1st paper, on Linnaeus' classifn. Disliked jargon 115
  1844? 1st 'Anglo-Chinese' Opium War 123
  1844 W teaching job in Leicester 115
  1844 'Vestiges of.. Creation' by Robt Chambers (cp Velikovsky) 55
  1844 Author of 'Vestiges' 'roundly denounced.. scientific elite..' 121
  1844 D copies arguments by Blyth 37
  Summer 1844 D claimed enlarged abstract to 320 pages; w/o divergence 18,60
  1845 Bates, Wallace met Leicester library; W discovers beetles 117
  1845 early B & W at 23 and 25 draw up plans, purchase supplies 128
  By coincidence, William Edwards, author, in London; helps 128
  Samuel Stevens becomes their agent; no disagreements ever 129
  Stevens shrewdly invests for W 256
  1845 'Explanation..' by Robt Chambers (also tho' anonymous) 55
  1845 approx W says idea something like Sarawak Law 'suggested itself' 27
  Nov 8 1845 W asks Bates his opinion of Chambers' 'Vestiges' 121
  Dec 28 1845 W writes Bates 'Vestiges an adroit thesis..'/ origin specs 123
  1846 W's brother died; collecting debts, W found railway mania 119
  Apr 11 1846 W to Bates mentions Darwin's Beagle & Lyell's Geol 1st time 124
  1847 W visits Insect Room, British Mus, moved 1881 to Nat Hist M 125
  1847? 'A Voyage Up the River Amazon' by Wm H Edwards published; W buys 125
  Autumn 1847 Wallace proposes joint expedition to Amazon; Bates accepts 127
  Jan 8 1848 W had 'squirreled' away £100 120
  1848 Dr Robert Waring Darwin died; left Charles about £40,000 120
  Apr 1848 W & Bates embark Liverpool 'The Mischief'; voyage to Para 130
  1849 US recognized Sarawak 24
  1850 W & B at Barra, present-day Manaus; they separate 137
  1851 prob. Asa Gray revisited England; met but didn't stay with Darwin 52
  1851 Goodrich's 'Universal History' 1 page on Malay archipelago 168
  Charlotte Bronte on first reading avowed atheism 291
  Mar 30 1851 B depressed, but Stevens' good news re money returns 7 years 153
  1852 W's 1st note in Proceedings of the Zoological Society 148
  Jul 12 1852 W weakened by illness decides to return; boards 'Helen' 154
  Oct 1 1852 W after fire & being picked up, & gales, lands at Deal 161
  Oct 5 1852 W already decides to travel more; Andes or Philippines? 162
  Aug 27 1853 Foreign Office authorises W to apply Admiralty for passage 169
  Oct 1853 W completed two books (D complains 'hardly facts enough') 164
  1853 W's 'A Narrative of Travels on the Amazon and Rio Negro' 136
  W's book 'Palm Trees of the Amazon' with 48 plates self-published 165
  1853? W attends lecture by T H Huxley (2 yrs younger) v impressed 166
  Later, Wallace felt quite at ease with H; 'only a few..' 267
  1854 RGS presents W ticket Singapore; 16 year old C Allen assistant 171
  Nov 1 1854 W lands at Borneo, mouth of Sarawak river 177
  W arrives 1st time in Sarawak; W & James Brooke get on well 24
  1855 W in Singapore and Borneo 194
  W nurses a baby orang-utan in Borneo 266
  Feb 1855 W sends 'Sarawak Law' to Annals & Magazine of Natural History 26
  1855 (no date) D starts correspondence with Gray; minor exchanges continue 53
  Jun 25 1855 W writes spelling out desirable character of new assistant 185
  Sept 1855 Selby, Badington, Taylor.. publish Wallace's Sarawak paper 26
  Wallace's first species paper 13
  W says "my paper on the succession of species" 178
  Hogben '1st great attempt.. general ideas.. distribution.. fossils 178
  W 23 notes & monographs BETWEEN S & T; largest insect collection 181
  W in this period papers almost 1/month (with no facilities) 182
  Nov 26 1855 Lyell reads W's essay & makes long summary, opens notebook 32
  Lyell still believed Genesis hence shock of Sarawak paper 184
  Dec 1855 D read & annotated 'Sarawak Law' 50
  Sar Law '10 well known facts' but 8 & 10 not known to D *** 30
  Dec 8 1855 Blyth writes to D, asks D what he thinks of Sarawak Law 37
  Blyth, despite D's reading him 20 yrs, didn't know D's views 38
  1856 Wallace in Bali, Lombok, Celebes, Ke 194
  May 3 1856 D wrote to Lyell re 'my doctrine before me' 34
  Apr 13 1856 Sun Lyell visits D; stays; discusses W. D has natural selection, not divergence 33
  D 'as early as 1856 Lyell advised me to write out my views' 33
  July 20 1856 D to Gray l of substance: no independently-created species 53
  July 30 1856 D asks Hooker to return Lyell's letter (so, he kept some)# 40
  Oct 10 1856 W starts corresp with D. 8 D letters exist; only bit of 1 W 40
  W in Macassar, capital of Celebes (now Sulawesi) 43
  Nov 19 1856 Bates in Amazon writes to W on his perfect originality 49
  1857 W in Aru, New Guinea, Timor, Banda, Ambon 194
  Jan 1857 W's letter reached Darwin (at Down) about now; no reply ** 44
  May 1 1857 D replies to W: 20th year/ preparing for pub; 0 on Lyell, Sar 46
  D also avoids species question 46
  D letter again mentioned here 205
  Sep 5 1857 D reveals to Gray doctrine of divergence: variation & survival 54
  Sep 27 1857 W writes to D: fragment exists of l on S Law and big book 46
  Dec 22 1857 D's 2nd l to W: omits Lyell & Blyth reactn; evades species 47
  Last letter from D to W until after July 1 1858 50
  Letter mentioned as appeal by D for facts 205
  Jan 4 1858 W writes to Bates re W's paper 'Succession of Species' 49
  W writes 'I have prepared the plan and written a portion..' 208
  Jan 8 1858 mail boat puts into Ternate 194
  1858 W in Ternate, Gilolo, Kaioa 194
  1858 W's deteriorating health evidenced in rambling letters etc 197
  1858 W and malaria - Brackman cps with Layard of Nineveh 198
  1858 W 'openly questioned Biblical story of creation' 184
  undated Sam Johnson: W says Amazon Indians, Dyaks never leave wives 238
  early 1858 W note in Zoologist on variations of, & what is a, species 45
  Mar 1858 W wrote out his theory "carefully" On the Tendency of Vars 201
  Mar 9 1858 W posts Ternate letter to D via Dutch vessel 17
  1st complete written exposition of desc & div thru var & ns 19
  '.. last piece of jigsaw.. divergence of species.. before D 145
  Mar 9 1858 & W posts letter Fredk Bates via Dutch vessel to Leicester 17
  Mar 25 1858 W recovered from malaria lives 'alone' on New Guinea 206
  1858 Summer Description of the hot summer in England 69-71
  Jun 3 1858 W letter to F Bates arrives at Leicester 17 & n
  Jun 4 1858 Fri Speculative date of W's Ternate letter to D 16
  Jun 8 1858 Tue D writes to Hooker: species not immutable 14
  Jun 8 1858 Tue D writes to Hooker: missing "keystone" found 16
  D had kept Hooker completely in the dark until this time 52
  Jun 10? 1858 Robert Brown of Linnean Society died. ... 63
  Jun 14 1858 Mon D entry in "little diary" 16
  D's entry was pigeons 'interrupted' 20
  Jun 18 1858 Fri D publicly advanced this date for receipt of Ternate letter 16
  Date almost universally accepted for receipt(Darwin's word) 20
  D letter to Lyell with Ternate paper, as W had asked 21
  1st mention of W in Darwin's existing correspondence with Lyell 33
  Letters (4 vols) ed Francis D: zero from here to Aug 1856 31
  Jun 26 1858 Sat D letter to Lyell on 'my priority of many years..' 61
  D PS 'it would be dishonourable in me now to publish' 211
  Next 3 days: letters from Lyell & Hooker; destroyed or lost 61
  Jun 28 1858 D's mentally retarded son dies; Darwins are 'thankful' 62
  Jun 29 1858 D to Hooker, thanking him and Lyell (their letters missing) 61
  Jun 30 1858 Letter sent posthaste to Hooker despite death, diphtheria 63
  Jun 1858 D's big book 'interrupted' by Wallace's MS, says F Darwin 20
  Jul 1 1858 announcement of the theory of evolution 20
  Pre-this date D. had published no word on species question 21
  Linnean Society meeting moved Jun 17th to Jul 1; 'windfall' 63
  D's letter and sketch (received day before!) copied in time 64
  'Wallace and Darwin had exchanged [only] two letters' 64
  Wallace had published, despite L-H/ order 'Darwin-Wallace' 66
  Burlington House, Piccadilly: new item on agenda 70
  Reason for inclusion of Gray's obscure letter: divergence 71
  W didn't know of reading, or see proofs of published record 71
  Only 28 fellows, plus two visitors; Darwin also absent 72
  Geo Bentham elected v.p. Withdrew his own paper on fixity 72
  Not in 'little diary'; must have been deliberate 73
  Lyell's diary also must have deliberate omission 73
  No London newspaper reported the meeting 73
  Bell's annual addr to Linnean Soc 'no striking discoveries' 72
  GROWTH OF MYTH: G. Bentham 'day Darwin's paper was read..' 72
  Lyell 'no other hypothesis..' astounding 80
  Leonard Huxley see below 80
  Others: T Huxley/ Grant Allen/ Edward Clodd 80
  Wallace himself in 1908 repeats 'papers' 299
  1910 book by John Judd '.. not called.. investigation' 340
  W again demonstrated ignorance of events.. Sarawak.. Linn 225
  Jul 5 1858 D. to Hooker: letter of thanks 76
  Jul 18 1858 D. to Lyell on same lines 77
  Jul 20 1858 Thu D 'began abstract of species bk'-'little diary' gap Jun 14 20
  Aug 1858 W's Ternate letter (proofreader?) & Darwin extracts pubd 79
  Oct 6 1858 letter from W survived; W thought D working on 'great book' 212
  1859 The Origin of Species published 33
  '.. every new edition differed..' 59
  D to W: 'I had absolutely nothing.. L & H.. fair curse..' 78
  Critic says Origin's 1st 4 paras have I, me, my 43 times 225
  Jan 25 1859 Date of letter, D to W: abandoned big book/ Linnean Soc 215
  Apr 6 1859 Date of letter, D to W: bk to John Murray/ 'no references' 216
  Apr 12 1859 Dutch boat arrives at Ternate . 213
  Apr 12+ 1859 W has 2 letters from D: dated Jan 25 1859 & Apr 6 [sic] 215
  1860 W returns to Ternate; letter from D dated Nov 13 1859
  D says he's sending a copy of 'Origin' 221
  W receives the book (date unknown) '.. admiration' 223
  Note: 19th Century: Dutch war starts about now, lasts 40 years (fn) 230
  Spencer's 10 volume Principles of Sociology starts; W read proofs 253
  1860 Prof Haughton's remarks in fact are available $$$$ 74
  1860 Wilberforce and Huxley debate 'many versions of the event' 250
  May 18 1860 Date letter D to W: reaction of D to W's feelings on Origin 227
  1861 W to Sims says Origin "difficult" to read 225
  1861 W '.. symptoms of weariness..' 'yr's end.. end of.. tether' 230
  Sep 23 1861 Wallace request (in Dutch archives) study Sumatra & Bangka 183
  1862 Bangka 'known for its open-pit tin mines' 228
  1862? W looks at Mendelian inheritance; butterflies (in effect) 229
  1862 W parts with Ali, young Malay; they'd been inseparable 186
  W decides to return home with 8 yrs of specimens 231
  1862 Francis Darwin claimed D began preserving all correspondence 53
  Apr 7 1862 W in UK to D, saying he's ill/ earliest believed to exist 237
  late 1862 3rd edn of 'Origin' 'perhaps most famous' sent to W 242
  1862-1867 W writes about 30 papers and monographs; two fill 200 pp 250
  1863 Lady Lyell: Wallace was 'shy, awkward & quite unused to good society' 251
  Society names included Lyell, Argyll, Wheatstone, Lubbock 267
  1864 Bates' 2 vol 'The Naturalist on the River Amazons' 136
  1864 Sarawak recognized by British Govt. 25
  May 1864 W paper on 'Man' and 'natural selection checked' 243
  1864 W predicts earliest man in Africa 244
  Jan 29 1865 Date on letter D to W, on originality of Geog Journal stuff 245
  1865 Bates appointed assistant secretary of Royal Geog Society 260
  Mendel 'delivers a paper' to the Bünn Society 303
  1866 Wallace marries Annie Mitten after failed courtship Miss L 252
  1867 D asks Bates caterpillar & moth colours; Wallace replies 169
  Marx's 'Das Kapital' published (?German? Not clear) 275
  Apr 4 1867 Lyell to W. said Sarawak paper was clearer than Darwin 59
  1869 'The Malay Archipelago' by Alfred Russel Wallace published 263
  Has the 'Wallace Line' . 264
  Violet Isabell, 2nd child of Wallace, born (Isabel on 255!) 263
  Apr 14 1869 D writes to W about W the only man.. never demand justice 288
  Jan 12 1870 Flat earther challenges re earth; W involved for c 20 yrs 257
  1870 'Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection' by W. 280
  1871 Descent of Man.. Selection.. Sex, by Darwin, pubd; many AW refs. 282
  1872 Francis Galton at seances was 'utterly confounded' 283
  Sep 2 1872 D writes to W expressing grief over non-existent Museum job 260
  1873 Revised 'Antiquity of Man' by Lyell adopts Wallace 281
  1874 Herbert Spencer Wallace (Bertie) dies aged 7 254
  1875 Lyell's mistaken recollection (attrib to distastefulness?) 67
  Arabella Buckley, Lyell's secretary, dies aged 78 287
  1876 D's autobiog sketch written; omits Lyell agitation re S Law 33
  Wallace's 'The Geographical Distribution of Animals' 2 vols 264
  Engels: The Part Played by Labor.. Transition.. Ape to Man 277
  1878 Govt declares Epping Forest 'Open Space' (cp. Wm Morris) 262
  1878? W on animal colouring in 'Tropical Nature' 265
  1878-1898 Three of W's (inc. Darwinism) books translated into Russian 268
  1879 Ernest Krause says Erasmus D 1st establd a complete theory 29
  1880 W publishes 'Island Life', 'one of his greatest works' 165
  Dec 11 1880 Huxley completes 'memorial' to apply for pension for W. 288
  Jan 7 1881 Darwin informed a pension had been granted Wallace 290
  July 1881 D writes to W 'life has become very wearisome to me' 290
  Apr 18 1882 Charles Darwin's death 179, 291
  1883 W 'free of financial burdens for the first time since.. 14' 292
  1885 Grant Allen in 'English Worthies': Darwin never strove to.. 80
  1886 Wallace does speaking tour of US after meeting Robt Lowell 292
  W met his brother John Wallace 'prospered', in California 294
  1887 Wallace spends 4 days with author Wm Edwards in Coalburg 128
  Francis D completes vol 1 of D's letters; Huxley mentions W 38
  F claims most letters before 1862 were destroyed;'nonsense' 40
  Life & Letters: missing letters question evaded by F Darwin 296
  'Many omissions were considered necessary' - 6000 words 41
  Aug 11 1887 Wallace 'returned to England' says Brackman 295
  Nov 10 1887 W writes to F Darwin, 'not aware..your father so disturbed' 296
  W opts 'to remain in character' 296
  1888 International Flat Earth Society founded 259
  Mar 1889 Wallace's 'Darwinism' published; word coined by W (says B) 300
  Aug 1889 New edition of 'Darwinism'; and reprinted 302
  1891 Dubois finds "Java man" (date not in this book) 176
  W in 'reprint' of 'Contrib..' adds footnote + intro note 297
  'ample recognition' being 'Origin' 6th edn & F D's letters 297
  1893 Jane Gray ed late husband's ls; D destroyed them except 1 53
  Jane writes the Darwins and finds Asa's ls largely missing 297
  1896 T Huxley in 'Darwinia' said 'W forwarded the memoir..'## 80
  1897 Francis D's last vol D's letters; Sarawak Law only 1 ref 31
  1897 'Pioneers of Evolution from Thales to Huxley' Edward Clodd 355
  1898 'This Wonderful Century' by Wallace 101
  'The Wonderful..', W's recollection 'main points of theory' 200
  1900? Wallace & wife move for last time to Broadstone, Dorset 306
  Mar 21 1900 de Vries acknowledges Mendel 303
  1901 British Labor (sic) Party founded 274
  W for 1st time notes surprise that D. arrived same theory 298
  1902 Gaps in volumes 1 & 2 of Life & Letters; Lyell, H, H, et al supply 41
  1905 W recalls causes of evol'n 'appeared almost inconceivable' 199
  1906 Hooker's account, inc 'landmine' mystery of missing letters 68
  Bunbury's diary published, ed by Lyell's wife, intr. Hooker 298
  1908 Royal Geog Soc'y survey of Amazon river part 'holds good' 141
  Gold Darwin-Wallace medal 'cast' by Linnean Society 305
  Wallace receives OM (delivered to him) founded Edward 1901 305
  Jul 1 1908 Wallace's observations & mistake on 50th anniversary 299
  1909 Francis D announces find of D's 1842 essay 'hidden..' 41
  Makes Brackman suspect F may have found & burnt W's letters 41
  1913 US: Henry Fairfield Osborn on finest points of D's char 81
  Wallace's last book, 'Moral Progress'; passage perhaps on D 298
  Wallace wrote 'powerful tracts'; warning of catastrophic conflict 309
  Oct 29 1913 Ellsworth Huntingdon of Yale writes to Wallace for help 307
  Nov 7 1913 Wallace died in the morning 309
  Family 'like Darwin & Hooker' - oppose burial in W Abbey 310
  Gravesite x
  Dec 13 1914 Annie Wallace dies 310
  1915 W's son said he never heard W say an unkind word about B 137
  Nov 1 1915 Memorial plaque to W unveiled, in Westminster Abbey 310
  Jun 1916 James Marchant's Alfred Russel Wallace published - mentions missing wrapper 42
  1918 L Huxley, 'Life & Letters.. Hooker' W 'genuinely waived' 80
  1921 Wallace's desk slate presented to Linnean Society 237
  1924 Export of birds of paradise from Aru Islands, Moluccas, N Gui banned 188
  1930 The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection R A Fisher 355
  1930s ish Under Stalin 'forced.. accept Lamarck's doctrine' (no evid) 203
  1950 approx G de Beer edits D's "little diary" after it came to light 20
  1951 Brackman's first journey in Borneo; never saw an orang 192
  1953 Michel Perrin claims found Amazon source in Peruvian Andes 131
  1954 Garrett Hardin wrongly says D 'wrote a paper' 81
  1957 AAAS & 'Zoogeography' and Wallace Line etc 224
  1958 1st unexpurgated edition of Darwin's autobiography * 41
  1958 Loren Eiseley; but unilateral act & no D paper 83
  1958 Christiaan Barnard 'openly wept' over ape heart 191
  1959 C F A Pantin, of Linnean Society, on importance of Sarawak39
  Gertrude Himmelfarb 'Darwin..' scandalous commentary says B 82
  Forerunners of Darwin from Johns Hopkins, Wallace unindexed 83
  W's descendants find anaconda skin, present to Linnean Socy 181
  C D Darlington 'Darwin's Place in History'$$$ 347
  1960 Marston Bates 'written jointly' and with wrong date 81
  1961 Leonard G Wilson finds Lyell notebks on transmut of species 32
  'traumatic impact of the Sarawak Law upon Lyell..' 298
  1962 Gerhard Wichler in Charles Darwin on Ternate paper ### 83
  1964 Old Orchard, Wallace's last home, bulldozed for housing 310
  1968 Barbara Beddall$ not '.. noble'; D gained, stuff vanished 85
  John L Brooks$$ convinced W 1st & only to [solve] diversity 18
  1969 Neil Armstrong stood on the moon (sic)207
  1970 Edited vol on Darwin has essay by Gillispie$ on injustice 84
  1970 Nat Geog expedition claim re source of Amazon 131
  1973 Soviet Encyclopaedia has myths 84
  1970s? Herbert H Ross says prearrangement, and D & W read papers 82
  1970s South Moluccans and Netherlands 219
  1974 Carneiro resigns as Director of Brazilian Conservation 131
  1975 'Sociobiology: The New Synthesis' by Edward O. Wilson 277
  'The Ascent of Man' BBC TV series: Bruce Mazlish on Wallace 346
  1977 Brian Inglis 'Natural and Supernatural' 280
  1978 Brackman looks up 8 letters to W from D; wrapper gone **** 42
  Sept 1978 Scientific American issue on evolution; Ernst Meyr wrong 84
  Presents Wallace misleadingly 'doing fieldwork', suggests handout 219
  1980 Brackman: 'for more than 100 yrs bits & pieces available..' 78
  Eight Cambridge scholars expect complete Darwin's letters 21-46 this year 351

$ these are (or were) dissenting voices, pro-Wallace
$$ John L Brooks, R C Stauffer, & others may have suggested Brackman's thesis
$$$ Darlington 'made a shambles of Darwin's priority'; unclear what B means
$$$$ 'Haughton's devastating commentary on the "joint communication"' p 354
# This falls short of a proof that Francis Darwin's claim of letter destruction was wrong
## The point B makes is that Wallace forwarded it, but not for Linnean Society
### ''..no evidence..of the date.. D discovered.. divergence, and a case can be made that Wallace beat him to it.'
* Brackman doesn't say what the cut stuff was; may have been innocuous
** I don't think Brackman gives proof it was delivered/ NO! D replied
*** Brackman omits details of the 19 line commentary etc D made of Sarawak Law
**** Possibly Marchant just thought it wasn't valuable

Further Notes on 'A Delicate Arrangement'

Apr 1997: I emailed Western Connecticut State College to see if I could find Brackman. They never replied.
May 1997: I found by Internet 'person search' or something: Arnold C Brackman & Agnes, 10 Chickadee Lane, Brookfield, CT 06804-3001, US

Seeds of Brackman's 1980 book
[1] Brackman was some sort of correspondent in the Straits area, where e.g. he heard for the first time of the 'Wallace Line' (p23n 1946/ p 338). His book was published by a Time Life subsidiary (ironically, on p303 Brackman correctly says, with an example, 'Time-Life publications are generally considered poor source material')
[2] Wife Aggie from Surinam in South America (p133) must be Agnes, authoress of 'The Art of Indonesian Cooking' (174); some interest therefore in Amazon, too
[3] Author is/was an academic of some sort (p342 says at Western Connecticut State College)
[4] Interested in stamps; and [5] Not much knowledge of guns

Brackman's other books (published by 1980) are listed at the beginning as:
The Luck of Nineveh, The Search for the Gold of Tutankhamen, The Gold of Tutankhamen, The Dream of Troy, The Last Emperor, 'and other works'. A computer search revealed Brackman also wrote a 1987 work on Tokyo war crimes - see below

Brackman's research methodology is a bit vague though the last chapter ('Author's Note') has accounts of lots of his research.
    Foreword is on the point of Wallace's almost complete eclipse by Darwin. Richard Dawkins (I'm pretty sure) barely mentions Wallace and shows no familiarity with his works. (Therefore, from the revisionist viewpoint, Wallace ought to receive much greater attention). Brackman gives a detailed description of Darwin's careful accounting of his upper-middle-class household expenses, and his methodical approach to life; this is a significant part of his case against Darwin, since Brackman found it unbelievable that Darwin could lose letters of enormous scientific importance. See my review above on the social significance attached to Darwin because of his wealth.

Essentially Brackman's book is three sub-books. I A Delicate Arrangement deals with the arrival of Wallace's letters to Darwin. II The Green Infernos deals with Wallace and Bates' early lives (not just their travels). III The Nobility of Character refers to Wallace, not Darwin. These sections overlap, so some material is common to all three, adding some confusion. Brackman tends to reproduce only very small extracts from letters, and sometimes letters seem selected to tell different tales in different parts of Brackman's book.
    Brackman reminds me of Arthur Koestler in the sense he's an essayist who likes his own voice, and declines to supply an overview. Brackman doesn't anywhere summarise what he's saying about Wallace's priority. Brackman's assumes from the start what he's trying to prove, though he seems occasionally to doubt himself; I'm not sure how he became convinced. Many dates are tiresome to hunt down. My long table (above) is extracted from his book, and may be helpful to others checking the various claims. Chapter 34 is anomalously almost all on spiritualism, which was one of Wallace's interests, but not very relevant. Brackman seems right that Wallace was 'badly taken in.. not unlike some people.. today.. psychologists, psychiatrists, mystics, and evangelists. ..'

Wallace has a number of supporters who are mentioned by Brackman—e.g. Beddall, & John L Brooks, and C F A Pantin—but they aren't summarised in one place. Nor are the opponents of the Wallace priority idea, such as, I think, McKinney. Nor are people who raised puzzles, such as Loren Eiseley p356. Some of these are collected in the Author's note at the end.

Stylistic and Other
    Americanisms, some a bit odd; don't sit well in a book on Victorian England. '.. wrote [sc. to] Darwin.' '.. Wallace's Darwinism ran 494 pages.' Anyone from the USA is 'American'. 'Skim ice' occurs many times. 'Wallace lucked out'. 'Lucretius' view is so contemporary ..' (p29). Brackman gets 'disinterested' confused with uninterested (p225). Can an 'inferno' be green? And inevitably there are typos: e.g. 'dumfounded' (both pp 31 & 117). There seem to be incorrect passages (e.g. p86) where the sense has been lost and probably not properly proofread.
    Some of Brackman's British English is shaky. He doesn't seem to know a 'windfall' is to do with fruit trees, or that 'Labor Party' is 'Labour Party'. Peacock's Melincourt (with its caricature of Lord Monboddo) is obviously not known to him. But he quotes tho' Coleridge, Stillingfleet, something not in my references, on Darwinising as Erasmus Darwin's Oran Outang theology of the human race')
    Some dates are wrong - Lyell's Principles & 'Beagle' given two publication dates! 264 & 265 have conflicting dates re 'The Geographical Distribution of Animals'. Brackman clearly hadn't heard of Benjamin Kidd. His comments on Lancelot Hogben misplace him oddly as 'the controversial historian' (p178).

'Social Darwinism' pp276-278; mostly attributed to Germany (I think without historical justification as US, UK had similar attitudes). And of course Brackman doesn't answer the problem. And more on p346, blaming Darwin & saying Wallaceism would have been different and humanitarian. P347 mentions USA. Wallace on his travels seems justifiably to have had a high opinion of 'savages'. P140 has an extract by Wallace on a gun accident, '.. luckily missed a number of people..' which Brackman considers offers a 'profound insight' into Wallace's character; unlike Darwin's scale with black to white, or a 'subtle form of scientific racism' with e.g. H C Chapman on 'ascending forms' of chimp, idiot, Negro & Kalmuck' (p147). This assessment may be wrong though; Wallace also talks of 'repeopling' islands with vegetation.

Political views Brackman in particularly can't use 'socialism' without saying it is 'Utopian'; he seems not to know of Robert Owen and other.

Some Opinions of Brackman Which Seem Odd
    'The scheme was mad' of the proposal to go with Bates to the Amazon; in fact if Wallace hadn't had the bad luck of a ship fire, & later 'invested' very badly he would have been well-off.
    Brackman says of Wallace finding the ship which would burn all his work to date, 'For the first time in years, he was in luck.' (p154)
    On Wallace not settling down with his money, plus a gift from a relative (p270), but speculating and losing the lot, Brackman tamely says Wallace was a 'dreadful businessman and a miserable administrator.'

More Items from the Missing Index
24 James Brooke, on whom Joseph Conrad based characters
144 Batesian mimicry
167 Raffles
168 'The bird of paradise had never been exhibited in Europe'
271 Brackman comments on Russell, Linus Pauling, J B S Haldane.
278 Brackman thinks thoroughly unpopular causes charmed him; his source is or was 'a near-neighbour in Dorset', J W Sharpe.
276 Women's lib; unmarried from choice & poss. beneficial effect c p276. Brackman doesn't know Russell and no doubt many others had similar lines of reasoning.
329 Passenger pigeon.
344 Marchant & missing Wallace letters
Muklucho Maklay, Russian anthropologist type in daring deed
On cave men, Gladstone is quoted on 'so-called scientists who trace their ancestry to troglodytes' - I take it these latter are cave dwellers.
Somewhere there's a comment attributing to Wallace a view ascribed widely to Bakunin.

Brackman's mention of Timor (after invasion) sounds as tho' in 19th century

THREE INTERESTING POINTS emailed to me by Bob Williams (not verbatim; information unchecked):
[1] 'Linnaean society reaction to Wallace's letter 'must have been sheer panic'; he'd already upstaged them with Sarawak letter & might have sent his material to AANH or anywhere. Published without permission within two weeks; unprecedented for a paper?'
[2] 'Brackman lets Darwin get away with the statement that Wallace's paper arrived on the 18th & Darwin mailed it to Lyell that afternoon.. but this was 30 pages on a subject Darwin had worked on for years..'
[3] 'Brackman may have info he doesn't want to reveal' (or of course may not want to communicate with someone not known to him).


HTML, notes Rae West. Notes and research May 1997. This format upload 2014-01-06 to 2014-01-13
Top of Page
W A P Manser on 'balance of payments' W A P Manser   Britain in Balance - The Myth of Failure 1971, revised 1973
Demolition Job in Economics Which Quashed the Entire Political Idea of 'Balance of Payments'

Interesting book on British economic policy; something I'd call 'revisionist', involving statistical problems in deriving simple measures, and logical arguments about imports and exports, and the history of British government accounting and interventions, but of course nothing Jewish. Very detailed references to many authoritative books. 'Authoritative' in the traditional sense. And stunning examples at intervals: accounts of the difficulties of finding index numbers for steel manufacture; the history of tally sticks; 'Half of all Britain's imports by weight are now oil'.

At the time, 'Balance of Payments problems' were in all the press. Manser found this irritating, and pointed out that invisibles were not being counted (insurance, profits, capital flows...) and that during the British Empire Britain ran a balance of payments deficit (in the newspaper sense) for centuries. Knowing what I do now, it's possible that attention was not to be drawn to Bank of England profits from currency control, and profits from weapons and wars.

A J P Taylor is quoted on the cover as saying 'It is political dynamite, making nonsense of this country's economic policies over the last 40 years. The pundits greeted it with embarrassed silence.'

I met Manser twice, having contacted him through Baring Bros, and the Institute of Economic Affairs, and did my best to interview him seriously. I must listen to my tapes again.
Top of Page
Irsigler cover   Review of Jewish interest   Franz Johann Irsigler: Who Makes Our Money? (1980?)

Revisionist survey of the part played by Jews since c 1694, February 6, 2012

[My review in Amazon, which was removed without my permission]–
Franz Johann Irsigler (born 1900) was a Catholic who lived in France and South Africa, where he worked in neurology and the brain. Irsigler has chapters on the American War of Independence, Who Plotted World War I ..., Who Plotted World War II ..., Roosevelt, financing of the so-called 'communist revolution', Churchill, the CIA, the press, paper money, Eisenhower a 'friend of Bernard Baruch ... promoted over 150 others ... without battle experience', 'Why genocide and holocaust', the Soviet Union's covert industrialisation, debt and developing nations, and a lot more. He has quite a good writing style. (But the title is hopelessly misleading!)

This book has eighteen chapters, but layout and logical structure is weak; hence four stars. Some chapters are in effect book reviews; others switch between topics; and the bibliographical information is not very good. All are undated. His sources include books like 'None Dare Call It Conspiracy', 'The Red Pattern of World Conquest', 'The Federal Reserve and Our Manipulated Dollar'. 'Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development' gets an unclear mention. Ingersoll (the rationalist) is quoted - Irsigler notes that Catholicism has the idea of eternal punishment, for example. There's some specific South African influence - the Afrikaners wanted to keep out of WW2, he says; he also notes that going to war was liked by many - they got regular pay.

The collection seems to have been published first in 1980. It needs improved titles, subheadings, a table of contents, and indexing. And really it should be edited to collect the ideas more readably. But anyone interested in revisionist (i.e. true) approaches to the first and second world wars, and related topics, would learn a lot from Irsigler.


This is a book of essays, with a rather silly title. A version was published by Noontide Press in the USA in 1980. My copy was bought from a BNP stall in northern England.

Irsigler was clearly on the right lines to understanding the links between Jews and money power. But (like most people) he accepted the idea that Hitler was almost single-handedly working for Germany, and not part of a secret international Jewish network.
      I've left these incomplete notes as I made them in about 2011. They may be helpful.

Dr F J Irsigler was 'a German brain specialist resident in South Africa.'. In 1932 he lived in France. The essays seem to end mid-1970s; there's a bibliography but not a very penetrating one with e.g. Wells' Outline dated 1950ish. No notes. No index. Internet has an undated pamphlet: 'On the Seventh Day They Created Inflation'. And an article on the brain in cetaceans.

Here's Irsigler's bibliography (with his page numbers):–
Allen, Gary: None Dare Call It Conspiracy pp 57-58
Butler, Eric D: The Red Pattern of World Conquest
Chesterton, A K: The New Unhappy Lords
Fuller, Maj-Gen J F C: The Second World War 1939-1945 p 44
Grenfell, Capt Russell, RN: Unconditional Hatred (1953) pp 81, 85
Ingersoll, R G: Lectures and Essays
Knupffer, George: The Struggle for World Power (1958. The date given here is revised version 1971) p 60
Larson, Martin A: The Federal Reserve and Our Manipulated Dollar
NOT IN THEIR BIBLIOGRAPHY Ponsonby, Arthur: Falsehood in Wartime (p 102)
Simpson, William Gayley: Which Way Western Man? pp 50-51, 64-65
Skousen, W Cleon: The Naked Capitalist
NOT IN THEIR BIBLIOGRAPHY Sutton, Anthony: Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development (3 vols) p 60
Wells, H G: The Outline of History

There's an interesting philosophical point in these essays—but as I type, I forget it! Yes. *GUILT* Christianity has the idea of punishment 'for ever'. Can it be collective? Or extend through time? Irsigler seems to be saying these are Jewish attitudes. But it makes sense to open up this idea to inspection as it affects attitudes to crime etc. Freud talked of collective guilt.. preached in the Bible. .. hold an individual responsible for a crime committed by one of his ancestors, or a whole nation for the actions of their king...'

Some notes on the CONTENTS of Isigler.

1 INTRODUCTION
His life in South Africa; brought up Catholic. Christianity has the idea of punishment 'for ever'. Born 1900.
P 6: End of WW1. Poles annexed territory ªmorally indefensible". Hertzog replaced by Smuts [like Chamberlain by Churchill?] War in 'reality to help the Communists.' Should have stayed out like Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland [or Spain, Turkey]. Irsigler sided with Afrikaans press and stayed out. Stories of people who criticised him; but he thought of WW1 and starry-eyed innocents - and war profiteers. 'Really big profits can only be made with armaments'. [NB seems to conflict with Irsigler's views on interest]
8 his French partner's description of trenches off putting. 8-9 Christian bargain with Constantine in exchange for allowing their followers to become soldiers. 9 4th century - Christ on war extirpated from the Bible, he thinks. 10: August 1941 'Atlantic Charter'; then Feb 1944 Churchill repudiated it. '.. shamelessly betrayed'.

2 WHO PROVOKED THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE? Paper money not redeemable in silver or gold. Whole movement based around this. BUT doesn't estimate if there should be interest? - is the security the responsibility of the issuers, and if so, what does it cost? Is there a chance of conflict of interest [pun not really intended] if governments print their own money? How much is the amount given to bankers (and where does it all go - after all, they only have a few houses....)? Not quantifying it is a huge irritation. Similarly p 17 Germany and Federal Reserve Bank owe lots... But some German debt probably dates from WW2 1694 Bank of England. And 1946 nominal takeover.
Quotes A M Wade (1977) Devolution in Banking.
Irsigler thinks the reason national debt grows is because of this system - not e.g. excessive weaponry.. 12 cheque-book credit much greater than money in circulation. 135 years ago Thomas Attwood.. 'Bankers prevented all further discussion of fractional reserve banking.. deeper debt.. higher taxes.. persuaded by the Bankers to fight wars..'
12: Bank of England provoked the American [not US at the time?] War of Independence.
12-13 Benjamin Franklin asked by English how they became prosperous. [NB could this be the origin of the 'hen' cartoon- poor Jews turn up and fuck everything up?] 13 account of having to pay interest - and the banker kindly lending more. 1766 House of Commons decision inexplicable. 'Dutch finance' the first. 14: bankers should have invented atrocity stories. 14: Wells history: Nothing on prohibition of printing of money by americans/ or why allied military alliances kept secret/ why italy 'officially an ally of Austria and Germany, declared war on them.'/ 1917 Kaiser peace offers/ financing of Russian Revolution by international bankers/ article 6 on giving to Soviet Russia [NB if true this is opposite of Russell on outcry of bourgeoisie]/ LG criticised Danzig and Polish corridor/ nothing on Hitler's peace offers to England 'after the defeat of Poland and France'. History as the bankers want it.
15: Abraham Lincoln and greenbacks to finance civil war.
15: Since 1913 paper money
15: 1931 coal mine at Swanenkirchen bankrupt - own paper money which was later declared illegal. Ditto in Austria. Influenced Hitler - unfortunately this looks all rather anecdotal. 16: Guernsey and Alberta too. 16: South Africa has housing materials and unemployment - but 11 or 12% is too high.
16: Hitler and his secrecy
18: 'developing nations have borrowed close to 250 billion dollars'
18-19 gold and oil and dollars related to each other
19: Franklin 1729 & Lincoln on paper currency. Universities divert to Freud and Marx.
20: in 1971 'Bankers acquired the right to transform any nation on earth into beggars... They may use these [unlimited printings of] banknotes to buy majority shareholdings in all enterprises.. and appoint their own stooges as general managers. .. Fearing exposure and retribution they want.. a regime where .. everything belongs to the state, i.e. to them...'

3 SCHEMES INVENTED BY THE FEW TO LIVE ON THE LABOUR OF THE MANY
Sacrifice as free food/ Czech gold/ 1979 central banks 50 bn dollars propping up dollar/ Federal Reserve book by Martin A Larson fills 5 pages; mostly quotations - it's a bit like a book review.

4 HOW TO SECURE WELL-PAID JOBS AND ACQUIRE WORLD FAME
Terrible title. In fact about diversions from reality by bankers.
Solly Zuckerman The Social Life of Monkeys and Apes 1932 - 'confirmed the finding of Freud' - but Eugene Marais of The Soul of the White Ant followed wild baboons for three years My Friends the Baboons [?1905] translated into English 1935 My Friends the Baboons - Freud fallacious. 1920 Territory and Birdlife. 1934 C R Carpenter The Behavior and Social Relations of Howling Monkeys fight over territory. Bankers promoted Freud so whites become preoccupied with sex, alcohol, drugs, and [presumably later] TV. 33 change of subject: Eisenhower friend of Bernard Baruch - promoted over 150 others.. without battle experience (says A K Chesterton) 33 Why Marx and Engels were adopted. Bad advice on money, on strikes. NOTHING on banks - nothing on US colonists and paper money. Criticised Hegel - who wrote in a censored country with church and king. Most derived from Plato. (Irsigler gives no evidence for this - could eg be Jewish origin).

5 WHO PLOTTED WORLD WAR I? WHO PROLONGED IT BY TWO YEARS? WHO CREATED DANZIG AND THE POLISH CORRIDOR?
Another garbled chapter on plotting war, financing USSR.
1953 Unconditional Hatred Capt Russell Grenfell. Serbia started Austro-Serbian War. Russia started greater conflict [possibly in collusion?] Of all the powers who least wanted war - Germans and British. Lowe Dickinson, Harry Elmer Barnes, M Mordhardt all agree with this. 38: account of alliances and secret understanding. 39: Ramsay MacDonald speech shows pre Banker. Bankers 100 million initial expenses of the war. - unclear stuff on paper money.
39 Why Germans thought Britain would be neutral
40 Sequence of events somewhat like Irving on Churchill - Why did the French and English keep military agreement secret? / Why did Poincaré visit the Tsar Nicholas? / Why did the French keep their agreement with Italy secret/ Why did the Italians pretend to be allied with Germany? WHY? France wanted Alsace-Lorraine and bits [presumably after war with Prussia and Paris commune?] Italians the south Tyrol, Serbs lands of Croats and Slovenes, Czechs Slovakia and Sudetenland, and Britain German colonies.
41 Churchill in 1936 said US entry into WW1 was disastrous; there would have been peace 1917 with the central powers.
41 Gary Allen American Opinion 1976 - secret agreement with Woodrow Wilson and House only revealed in 1927. 42 some notes on US finance and the war - and bonds that would become worthless if Germany won
42 'Czarism and the Revolution' Gen Arsene de Goulevitch [no date given] on finance of the Communist revolution. Large number of financiers involved. Much detail, but not in sequence, so it's hard to follow. Also of course Versailles and implicit arrangements for another war. And no self-determination for Germans and Austrians and whoever helped them - Slovaks, Hungarians, Croats. Also 132 billion marks in gold. 2.1M Germans under Polish rule - Lloyd George thought would lead to war.
44 Maj Gen J F C Fuller The Second World War 1939-1945 (1948)
44 M Follick Facing Facts - A Political Survey for the Average Man (1935) outrage of Danzig.
44 Wilson's Armistice offer: of 23 conditions only 4 were incorporated into the peace treaty. 45 Wilson lied; but not v satisfactory paragraph.
44-45 welcome for 'assistance of every kind' for Russia. It's not clear to me what this means - Lenin? or Kerensky? Irsigler thinks it means 'Communism' - but what about the battles that took place? Irsigler says if Germany had gone 'Communist' it would have kept its territory and 'delegated to the British and Americans the final battle with the tycoons of Wall Street.'

6 WHO ARE "THE BANKERS", THE SECRET RULERS OF THE WORLD
7 WHO IS BUILDING UP THE MILITARY AND ECONOMIC STRENGTH OF SOVIET RUSSIA?
8 JOHN STOCKWELL REVEALS SOME SECRETS OF THE CIA
9 FOR WHAT PURPOSE WAS THE FILM "ROOTS" COMMISSIONED?
10 WHO PLOTTED WORLD WAR II? JEHOVAH VERSUS CHRIST
11 WHY DID ROOSEVELT PROVOKE THE JAPANESE AND REJECT THEIR SURRENDER?
12 IS GOD DEAD?
13 OUR NEWSPAPERS, THE WATCHDOGS OF DEMOCRACY IN ACTION
14 WHY WAS UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER IMPOSED AND THE MORGENTHAU PLAN MADE PUBLIC? WHY "GENOCIDE" AND "HOLOCAUST"?
15 THE JEWS
16 SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL
17 OTHER MISTAKES OF HITLER
18 THE FUTURE


Top of Page

HTML and all content ©Rae West. This file on revisionism first uploaded 22 Dec 2019.   Last update 10 July 2024