I'm afraid his book is somewhat amateurish in its layout, with paste-ups, a great deal of centred text in place of the usual left-justified text, little in the way of helpful emphasis, and no running chapter headings. To find a chapter, you have to look up the starting page number in the contents—for example, p 62 starts his list of 'Principal Sources of the Divine Law of ... Orthodox Judaism', of which there appear to be about twenty, arranged chronologically in five eras. It's somewhat pathless and confusing—though this is unlikely to be entirely his fault. His introduction is a rather dismaying assemblage of extracts whose significance is unclear.
      It occurs to me, in fact, that Hoffman has considerable experience with both modern and ancient books, and with booklets and online material; maybe the dismaying layout is intentional? Perhaps Jews who want to kill people with the temerity to read their stuff are put off by lack of clarity? Who knows.

Here are the Contents: Author's Preface / Caveat (omitted from the Contents table) / Introductions, including to the General, Judaic, and Christian / Principal Sources of the Divine Law of Judaism / Judaism's Attack on the Prophets and Patriarchs / Judaism's Bible Code Nullifies the Word of God / Loopholes and Escape clauses / Lying / Bribery / Contents of the Babylonian Talmud / Warrant for the Murder of Gentiles / Groundwork for Talmudic Courts / Anti-Black Racism / Christians in the Talmud [which includes the duping delight Maimonides 'Guide of the Perplexed']/ Judaism and Reincarnation / Star of Bohemia, Not David / Judaism and Menstruation / Judaism and Abortion / Calendar and Holy Days / Yom Kippur and the Kol Nidrei Nullification of Vows / Birkat HaMinim: The Curse on Christians / Child Molestation and Homosexuality / Priestcraft in the Synagogue / Glossary & Index.
      The glossary (c. 130 words and short phrases, are Anglicized, presumably from Hebrew. I don't know if the words are transliterated in French, German, and other European languages. Thus ‘Ladino The language of the Iberian Sephardim’. The glossary in many cases needs expansion: for example, ‘Kohen: Priest’ presumably includes only 'Judaics', but what about grades? And who says some person is a 'Kohen'?
      ‘Mamzer: Bastard’ has similar problems of definition. Hoffman's longest glossary entries give explanatory detail: Khazars and Yichus; movements and schisms; details of compilations; legalisms. The longest entry is Shiksa. There is no entry for 'gentile'.
      The Glossary doesn't mention important details outlined in the rest of the text, for example the Eruv [wired area considered Jewish, by Jews], the Hanukkah hoax, Kol Nidre, 'Noahide Laws', and Purim.
      The 8-page index has subsections on BIBLE, GENTILES, JUDAISM, RABBIS, and TALMUD. Almost all these entries are anti-Gentile or pro-Judaic. For some reason, ‘God's word’ is not indexed. Nor is ‘pagan’. Unfortunately, complicated references are only give a string of page numbers; does Hoffman really expect readers to look at twenty or so entries on 'nullification of its [the Bible's] laws and words'?

  The Importance of Sophistication

I'm not particularly attracted by Hoffman's presentation. But he makes an extremely important point: bookshop shelves groan under the weight of books against Islam (and, he refrains from pointing out, books against Christianity, and pro-vulgarised and wrong religion) but books giving facts on Judaism are all but non-existent. For that reason, his book (and the longer version from which this is condensed) may be the only book of its type that you will ever see. And it could be censored soon enough. So I have to recommend it on grounds of importance; hence my star rating, which is not a very honest assessment compared with similar, but non-existent, books.

Unfortunately, modern features emerging from Judaic woodwork aren't historically important enough for Hoffman. The word 'shiksa', more or less calling all non-Jew women whores, isn't explored much by Hoffman, though it must have had effects—Leo Frank, and 'Jack the Ripper' come to mind. The implausible matrilineal inheritance belief isn't (I believe) dated. The invention or co-option of such groups as Freemasons and Common Purpose, and structures such as Supreme Courts and company law, aren't looked into; neither are the fanatical groups which emerge from time to time.

Let me outline some disparate topics here, so far as I've found them.

I think I detect a distinctive feature in some passages, of Judaics pleading for money. The writers are generally what might be called scholarly types, whose brains react to texts placed before them, and who respond to repeated applications of similar material. Destroyers of other people's libraries, interested solely in topics they have been accustomed to, anxious that women with money will selectively marry them, wanting their flocks to be timid and scared, concerned that their expertises, however thin, should be valued. Perhaps the Jewish century will crumble as the real value of their absurd rubbish is perceived.

Hoffman takes many of his premisses from Christianity. One of them is love. His Introduction to Judaics assures them he loves them. And hopes to find a Judaic wanting to convert, with co-operative work in mind. Does he love Jews who mass murdered Russian Orthodox priests, for example? Well, who knows. But he is clear on 'Nazis' (National Socialists) who he abominates. So the love seems unevenly distributed. Hoffman's reasons for disliking 'Nazis' seems to be their 'racism'—his word, which seems truly odd, since it is a Jewish neologism not even 100 years old. It's also one of his reasons for disliking 'Jews': '... Judaic souls enslaved to racial nationalism ... an absurdity when it is applied to a conglomerate of disparate people and races today classed generically and falsely under the heading of “Jew”'. We also have a chapter-and-a-bit on 'Anti-Black Racism'. Jewish or Judaic (or Pharisaic?) writings express dislike for blacks, but Hoffman doesn't seem to realise they had more contact with them than the white Europeans later persecuted to convert to Christianity. Maybe they knew what they were talking about, and felt a difference which Christianity had no need to know of. Hoffman writes on abortion and other aspects of Jewish tampering with bodies; he takes what seems to most whites a common-sense view of approximate equality taken from times in which societies were more homogeneous, versus the Rabbinical view that only Jews count. The chapter Christians in the Talmud is Hoffman's longest.

Judaic obsessions with toilets, menstruation, non-Jew women as whores, child molestation make rather disgusting material for Hoffman's pen. The chicken twirling thing is amusing and suggests a hypnotic inbred tendency to do whatever the victim is told when young.

I have to say there is some unrevisionist information from modern times. Hoffman's treatment of false flags, the 'Holocaust', First and Second World Wars, US war crimes suppression, for example seem over-conventional to me and not in the spirit of revisionism.

Hoffman looks at the calendar, the six-pointed star, but not (I think) the number system, defects in which may help explain absurdities such as the '6 million' repetitions, the 600 cubit penis, etc. It's striking how unoriginal the Judaic mind seems to be: the calendar, star, number system, alphabet, hanukkah through to Bernstein, Boas, Einstein, Freud, are impressive more by their failings than achievements.
      Hoffman devoted many pages to halachic observance, and menstruating Judaic women, who are niddah—goyim women, if that's the right word, are always 'niddah'. Parents of disabled or retarded children, it seems, blame this rubbish above genetics.
      On 'The Hebrew Calendar' (pp 330-337) we have two diagrams, showing 12 months with of 30 days and 29. This of course falls short of a year, and a system of leap months at 2 or 3 years intervals makes some sort of correction, apparently repeating every 19 years. What happens to the remaining quarter of a day isn't explained. Annoyingly, Hoffman explains that the Judaics to some extent plan by their calendar. A table of significant dates—such as Tisha b'Av—for the next (say) forty years, to watch for Judaic crimes, wars etc, might have been handy. Hoffman divides the past into pagan times and then times illuminated by the transcendent splendours and wonders of Christianity. This weakens his writings—he seems to think achievements of Babylonians and others were evil, damaging, or negligible. Hoffman underrates the importance of observations and calendars. All this is perhaps typical of human parasitism: let others do the work. Then we may deign to mimic it.
      Six pointed star. Page 291 has a scan of a 'medieval rabbinic text of magic spells and incantations', showing simple small circles linked with lines. Bequeathed, says Hoffman, in the 14th century by Charles IV of Bohemia'. Taken from a 1991 edition of a book by 'Rabbi Gunther Plaut'. (Hoffman does not provide a bibliography; references are in the text).
      Hoax of Hannukah (pp 344-345). Rather disappointingly (I'd expected this to have an identifiable date of fakery) Hoffman is concerned with interpretations, such as a sign of God's continuing adoration of the Jewish people!
      Purim. The 14th of Adar beginning the evening before. Religious customs 'include a host of primitive revenge motifs'. Including George W Bush launching an invasion of Iraq on Purim, March 19, 2003.

First Facebook comment describes a Jewish technique: warn people, and take indifference as proof Jews can go ahead, in this case burn Notre Dame.
  The second comment states the image was not genuine, which of course is hard to check without trawling through Simpsons cartoons. It shows why sources are helpful.
  Something urgently needed is a concordance of Jewish techniques of deception, derived from, but not spelt out, in the Talmud.
    People of Hoffman's mentality seem to assume that 'sacred' books are reliable indicators of activity. But it's obvious enough that the activities of Christians often, or usually, haven't and don't follow their bookish ideas. And no doubt the same is true of the Talmud.

Other conspicuous omissions include Jewish destructiveness, commemorated in their real or claimed complete destruction of enemies' buildings, animals, and men—but not female sex slaves. In practice, Jews have destroyed large chunks of Russia, China, central/eastern Europe, and central and South America—which had civilisations which had developed in isolation for the longest time, and which Roman Catholics and other proxies for Jews destroyed on a huge scale. Notre Dame's destruction points the same way. Another example is the British Empire, which in 1900 had more shipping than the rest of the world, now almost erased from historical memory. The spoliation of Vietnam and its people is another example. The ancient world is still a target: the Ziggurats in Iraq having been mostly demolished.

Much of this seems to be a pre-literacy attitude. Jews seem to assume that survivors or observers or rediscoverers of atrocities can simply be forgotten.

I expect Hoffman's work to take its place with other modern critical types, such as Kevin MacDonald, who do not go as far as they should. And the CODOH people systematically dismantling the Holohoax fraud. But it's nowhere near as useful as it might have been.

RW 2018-01-16 | Enlarged 2018-12-23 & 2019-04-20

Disappointingly, Hoffman is unable to face examination of facts about Jews and the so-called Holocaust, and Jews and 20th-century wars. This 'affirmation' is copied from his website in December 2020, but was certainly there a long time previously.