He followed this up with his article on the Romanovs, who seem to have displaced other Russian bloodlines, and may therefore have collaborated with Jews, possibly foolishly. Both these pieces are long and include graphics, and are in their own separate files, with some notations by me.
Bolshevik Execution of Romanovs was a Jewish Hoax   Another impressive article, in its own file

The other 40 or so articles here are mostly brief and taken from email exchanges. One is on 'eugenics', which has been spun from simple medical desiderata into a network of disputes involving selective Jewish activity against 'goyim', birth control, abortion, conflicts between races and notably Jewish impulses, conflicts between relative population and total population sizes, propaganda, and eugenics. Mr Bustion bases his work on publications at the time.
      Some of the other items are based on readings which perhaps are too small scale; for example; the Anna Freud quotations seem to show that the (largely Jewish) area of Hampstead, London, wasn't bombed in the Second World War, but this doesn't show that 'working class' areas were not bombed or shelled. Some of these articles are based on superstitions in my view. But I'll leave them for the moment; they may be updated.
      These are roughly newest first, unless there's an obvious sequence - RW

Jacques de Molay and Possible Lookalikes, Identities
Ancestral connections of Christopher Jon Bjerknes that give excellent reason to suspect that he is not only controlled opposition, but a government agent
'Brother James Key', Youtuber who appears to denounce Trump; and Trump as Jew Agent
Martin Luther's ancestry and the invention of Protestantism
Jewish promotion of pedophilia and child sexual abuse... and against it ... controlled opposition
My opinion: true purpose of Russia vs Ukraine is to force millions of Ukrainians to emigrate
Louis XVI and Bourbons
Noahide Laws
Hitler, Nobility, Rockefellers
Hitler the Wealthiest Man in Europe...?
Siegfried Bleher
Rosa Bernie Nienau, Jewish child friend of Hitler's
Dumbing Down? Dyslexia? College is a scam?
Hexzane on Stalin and Hitler
On Harry Potter and Automatic Writing
Jewish Hoax: Criminal Trial of Katzenberger. With sex and the Rothschilds
Margaret Sanger, the Rockefellers, and Eugenics was a Jewish Hoax
The AntiMasonry of the Roman Catholic Church
Elite Gender Inversion
Weaknesses of Hexzane527's Work
Weaknesses of Miles Mathis's Work
Jews in the USSR and Russia
Henry Ford documented as a Freemason
Spirits Telepathically Instructing Jews?
Cremation of Executed Murderers
AntiZionism may be Controlled Opposition
New Theses about Stalin
White South Africa had White Ruling Families
Nuremburg Law against Interracial Sex a Hoax
Churchill Exposed as a Fraud
Anna Freud on German London Bombings Shows they were a Hoax
Holodomor and Nakba
Trotsky's Assassination
Hitler dissociative identity theory

Mr Bustion emailed many images of family trees, some of which I've expanded into the ADL site and the Romanov execution hoax, too long to be included in this page, and therefore elsewhere on the site.
    The zipped groups of images can be seen by clicking on: Attachments-Hitler had Russian relatives.zip | Attachments-Hitler was related to British nobility and elites.zip | Attachments-Hitlers' 2x great grandparents were siblings, too.zip | Attachments-King Louis XVI of France was 10x great grandson of Amadeus Savoy VIII, statements on other genealogical connections that I discussed, this is congruous with Mathis's view that the execution of the Bourbo.zip | Attachments-King Louis XVI of France was 16x great grandson of King Phillip IV of France.zip | Attachments-Literal incestuous unions in Hitler's ancestry and in Rockefeller's ancestry.zip | Attachments-Mary-Phagan-jpegs.zip | Attachments-Nelson Rockefeller's second wife's tree as further evidence of the former's relation to Hitler.zip | Attachments-Relation of Hitler to the Rockefellers, possible relation of the former to Johann Andrea, founder of the Rosicrucians.zip

The top attached image is a painting of King Phillip IV Capet of France. The bottom is a painting of Jacques de Molay. They look very similar. They have identically, if not, almost identically, shaped noses, eyebrows, eyelids and skulls. The only discernible definite differences in their appearance seem to be due to clothing, hair style and make up. I was mocked for suggesting that they are the same person, on twitter. Maybe they're not, but I think that they look very similar. Do you think that they look similar?

Paul

NB: I'm not going to write much more on the Templars or de Molay in the near future because I intend to focus on Rittenhouse's case, but I wondered what you thought of my point on the similarity in appearance between these two.

Attachments-Similarities in appearance between King Phillip IV of France and Jacques de Molay.zip

I found two other paintings that confirm the high similarity in appearance of King Philip IV of France and Jacques de Molay. They have identically, if not, very similarly, shaped noses, eyes, eyebrows, eyelids and skulls. It seems that all discernible differences are probably or at least plausibly a result of hair styling, clothing, make up or prosthetics. In my opinion , this indicates the possibility that they are the same. If not, they are likely close relatives since they resemble each other.
      De Molay was executed by burning at the stake on March 18, 1314. Jacques de Molay (1244-1314) - Find a Grave Memorial

King Philip died on November 29 , 1314. Philippe IV of France (1268-1314) - Find a Grave Memorial De Molay pronounced a curse on King Philip while he was burning. Then King Philip died nine months later. It seems to me that maybe they are the same person and the king had to disappear to prevent people from figuring this out.

Attachments-Two other paintings demonstrated high similarity in appearance between Jacques de Molay and King Philip of France.zip [Note by RW: the format of these images doesn't work with me. You need .jpg or similar graphics format]

Pope Clement V, according to what we call the standard narrative of the persecution of the Knights Templar, was imprisoned by King Philip of France in the Babylonian captivity of the papacy, and was coerced by the latter into persecuting the Knights Templar.
      He bore an uncanny similarity to both de Molay and King Philip. All three have identical, if not, almost identical, eye shapes, eyelid shapes, eyebrow shapes, nose shapes and skull shapes. There is a similarity between the pope and the king that is not discernible in deMolay, because of clothing, same shape, thickness and length of neck.
      I am inclined to believe that they were the same person.

Paul

Attachments-Pope Clement V Compared to de Molay and King Philip.zip

I worked on the family tree of Christopher Jon Bjerknes. He has some very suspicious family connections. He is fourth cousin, thrice removed, of the wife of Jacob Bonnevie, a member of the Norwegian parliament.
      I don't know what the name of the dad of Christopher Jon Bjerknes is, but his dad is the son of Christian Bjerknes, which makes Christopher Jon Bjerknes through him, great -grandson of Peter Christensen Bjerknes. Through him, 2x great grandson of Aletta Koren. Through her, 3x great grandson of Wilhelm Koren. Through him, 4x great grandson of Ulrich Koren. Through him , 5x great grandson of Niels Koren. Through him, 6x great grandson of Johan Koren. Johan Koren was dad of Magdalena Koren. Through her, granddad of Johan Christie. Through him, great granddad of Eilert Christie. Through him, 2x great grandad of Ann Christie. Through her, 3x great grandad of Ann Daee. Ann Dae was the wife of Jacob Bonnevie.

From wikipedia:
[begin quote]
Jacob Aall Bonnevie (31 December 1838 – 13 August 1904) was a Norwegian educator, school director and text book author. He served as a member of the Norwegian Parliament for the Conservative Party.
[end quote]
Jacob Aall Bonnevie - Wikipedia
Jacob Aall Bonnevie: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Bjerknes is paternal 2x great grandson of the physicist Carl Anton Bjerknes.
From wikipedia again,
[begin quote]
Carl Anton Bjerknes ([phonetic alphabet I haven't copied-RW] /'bj??rkn?s/ BYURK-niss, Norwegian: ['bjæ^rkne?s]; 24 October 1825 – 20 March 1903) was a Norwegian mathematician and physicist. Bjerknes' earlier work was in pure mathematics, but he is principally known for his studies in hydrodynamics.
[end quote]
Carl Anton Bjerknes - Wikipedia
Carl Anton Bjerknes: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Christopher Jon Bjerknes is eleventh cousin, three times removed, of the Norwegian Nazi collaborator Quisling. I will just state each name in order to show the relation:
    Christopher Jon Bjerknes, son of unknown Bjerknes. Unknown Bjerknes, son of Christian Bjerknes. Christian Bjekrnes, son of Peter Bjerknes. Peter Bjerknes, son of Carl Anton Bjerknes. Carl Anton Bjerknes, son of Abraham Bjerknes. Abraham Bjerknes, son of Isaac Bjerknes. Isaac Bjerknes, son of Eli Kjorstad. Eli Kjorstad, daughter of Mareth Olufstr. Mareth Olufstr, daughter of Beret Gulliksdtr. Beret Gulliksdtr, daughter of Gulik Eivindsen. Gullik Eivendsen, son of Eivind Olsen. Eivind Olsen, son of Olav Elvindson. Olav Elvindson, son of Astrid Olavsdatter. Astrid Olavsdatter, daughter of Olav Erlandson. Olav Erlandson, son of Erland Olavson. Erland Olavson, dad of Olav Folkestad. Olav Folkestad, dad of Ekilive Oluvsdatter. Mom of Gregar Have.
    Gregar Have, dad of Aaste Gregarsdatter. Aaste Gregarsdatter, mom of Sveinung Gunalvsen. Sveinung Gunalvsen, dad of Anne Sveinungsdatter. Ann Sveinungdatter, mom of Ann Nilsdatter. Ann Nilsdatter, mom of Nils Funemark.Nils Funemark, dad of Andrea Nilsdair. Andrea Nilsdair, mom of Larry Rasmussen. Larry Rasmussen, dad of Jon Abrahamsen. Jon Abrahamsen, dad of Vidkun Abraham Lauritz Jonssøn Quisling.

The former two attachments are CJB's relation to Bonnevie. The latter two are his relation to Quisling.

And Bjerknes is the paternal 2x great grandson of the physicist Carl Anton Bjerknes, like I said before.

All of these are good reasons to be very suspicious of Bjerknes. I have little doubt that he is a government agent.

Paul

Attachments-Ancestral connections of Christopher Jon Bjerknes that give excellent reason to suspect that he is not only controlled opposition, but a government agent

Hello Rae,

There is a youtuber called Brother James Key, who is monomaniacally obsessed with the notion that Trump is the AntiChrist. The sole purpose of his channel is to rant against Trump. He has only made a handful of videos where he discussed anything other than his belief that Trump is the AntiChrist. And I mean a handful literally, it was less than five. I believe that Key is complicit in a deception. There is a plan by the big Jews to use Trump as their agent, in order to force the little Jews to go to Israel, and to stage a war between the white European nations and Israel. Trump will persecute the Jews and lead a war against Israel in the future. Key is the agent of the scriptwriters, to dupe dumb goyim into following the agenda of the script. I believe that Trump will persecute Christians, and Christians will resist Trump, resulting in mass executions of Christians, which will further the Jewish goal of exterminating the hated white race.
      Key has over 19,100 subscribers on youtube. He has not been banned even though he constantly talks about topics that most people, even with a much smaller audience than he has, would be banned for.
      I figured that Key must be one of those crypto-Jewish actors. While working on Mary Anne Phagan's genealogy recently, I noticed that her stepdad, John Coleman, had a recent ancestor whose surname was Key, and figured that that was likely a relative of Brother James Key. I did extensive, excruciating investigation, and found out that I was correct. There is no doubt that Mary Phagan's stepdad was related to James Key, although the exact manner in which the tree that I worked on states it is probably slightly incorrect. For now, I will show what the tree that I am working on says, I intend to revise it to be more accurate. The tree says that Mary Anne Phagan was the stepdaughter of the husband of the eighth cousin, four times removed, of Brother James Key.
      Brother James Key's real full name is James Edward Key. James Edward Key is the son of James Monroe Key, through him, grandson of Denville Owen Key. Through him, great grandson of Francis Joshua Key. Through him, 2x great grandson of George W Key. Through him, 3x great grandson of Thomas Key. Through him, 4x great grandson of William Key. Through him, 5x great grandson of William Key.Through him, 6x great grandson of Thomas Key. Through him, 7x great grandson of William Key. Through him, 8x great grandson of Thomas Key. Through him, 9x great grandson of Thomas Key. Through him, 10x great grandson of Edmund Key. Through him, 11x great grandson of Andrew Key. Andrew Key was the dad of John Key. John Key was the dad of John Key. John Key was the dad of Martin Key. Martin Key was the dad of John Key. John Key was the dad of John Key, Junior. John Key Junior was the dad of John Key III. John Key III was the dad of George Walter Key. George Walter Key was the dad of Sarah Ann Key. Sarah Key was the mom of Mary Emma Tuggle. Mary Tuggle was the wife of John Coleman. John Coleman was the husband of Frances Benton, through her, the stepdad of Mary Anne Phagan. That makes Mary Anne Phagan stepdaughter of the husband of the eighth cousin, four times removed, of Brother James Key.

James Key is also a distant cousin of Francis Scott Key, the author of the star spangled banner. The reason that I said that the tree that I have connecting him to Mary Phagan is slightly inaccurate is because there were contradictions of the people in this tree and the tree that I saw connecting Key to Francis Scott Key. I have no doubt that in the fully accurate tree, James Key would still be connected to both Mary Anne Phagan and Francis Scott Key. I don't want to work on correcting the tree at the moment so am just showing information for the moment.

I know that you do not believe in the paranormal, but relating this reminds me of an incident that I found very spooky. One afternoon I was walking to the library, and a woman saw me in her car and offered me a ride, and I accepted it. While we were talking in the car, she volunteered, out of the blue, that she was a direct descendant of Francis Scott Key, the author of the star spangled banner. To be honest, I had not even heard of the man before she mentioned him to me. I remembered James Key at the moment, though needless to say I did not bring him up, and thought she must be related to James Key through her ancestor. At the time the incident seemed very spooky to me, like there was a telepathic connection between the woman and me and spirits were involved.

I believe that the people behind this have been planning this for over a thousand years, to hire a dupe who they would trick into being their controlled opposition agent, and make him the central villain of their drama, that they would deceive the world into believing. That is the reason for Brother James Key and other youtube accounts calling Trump the AntiChrist, I believe.

There are similarities between Trump and Leo Frank. One is that Trump was accused, without evidence, of raping a female during her fourteenth year. They were both accused, without evidence, of many sexual crimes. They were both accused of barging in on young females while they were dressing. They both had one segment of society irrationally hate them and another segment irrationally love them.

I know that you don't like linking to youtube, but for people to be able to see who Brother James Key is, here is a link to his channel, Brother James Key - YouTube. It goes without saying that I'm not recommending his content as a source of accurate information, I'm denouncing him as an agent and shill intentionally deceiving people.

Paul

As I said earlier, my genealogy of the relation of Mary Anne Phagan to Brother James Key was slightly incorrect. But the corrected genealogy has them more closely related, not less. And here I will send the genealogy connecting Brother James Key to Francis Scott Key, too. First, the corrected chart connecting Mary Ann Phagan and Brother James Key. Mary Ann Phagan was the stepdaughter of the husband of the fourth cousin, thrice removed, of Brother James Key.

James Edward Key is the son of James Monroe Key, through him, grandson of Danville Owen Key. Through him, great grandson of Francis Joshua Key, through him, 2x great grandson of George Key. Through him, 3x great grandson of Thomas Key. Through him, 4x great grandson of William Key. Through him, 5x great grandson of Martin Key. Through him, 6x great grandson of John Key (1696-1767). John Key (1696-1767) was dad of John Key, Junior (1731-1790). Through him, granddad of John Waller Key IV (1752-1827). Through him, great granddad of George Washington Key. Through him, 2x great grandad of Sara Key. Through her, 3x great granddad of Emma Tuggle. Emma Tuggle was the wife of John Coleman. John Coleman was the husband of Frances Benton. Frances Benton was the mom of Mary Ann Phagan.

Brother James Key is eighth cousin, seven times removed, of Francis Scott Key, author of the Star Spangled banner. I already stated the connections in the last genealogy, up to John Key (1696-1767). James Edward Key. James Monroe Key. Danville Key. Francis Key. George Key. Thomas Key. William Key. Martin Key. John Key (1696-1767). James Edward Key is 6x great grandson of John Key (1696-1767). Through him, 7x great grandson of Martin Key (1670-1706). Through him, 8x great grandson of John Key (1653-1690). Through him, 9x great grandson of John Key (1630-1671). Through him, 10x great grandson of Andrew Key (1603-1675). Through him, 11x great grandson of Matthew Key. Through him, 12x great grandson of Nicholas Key. Through him, 13 x great grandson of William Key. Through him, 14x great grandson of John Key (1471-1525). John Key (1471-1525) was the dad of Roger Key. Through him, the granddad of Thomas Key. Through him, the great granddad of Richard Key. Through him, the 2x great granddad of John William Key. Through him, the 3x great granddad of Richard William Key. Through him, the 4x great granddad of Phillip Key. Through him, 5x great grandad of Francis Key. Through him, 6x great granddad of John Ross Key. Through him, 7x great granddad of Francis Scott Key. This makes Brother James Key the eighth cousin, seven times removed, of Francis Scott Key, author of the Star Spangled banner.

In the attachments, the first two images are of the chart of the relation of Brother James Key to Mary Ann Phagan. The latter two images are of the chart of the relation of Brother James Key to Francis Scott Key. I begin with the part of the chart showing brother James Key and end with the part showing the famous relative in both cases.

Paul

Relation of Brother James Key to Francis Scott Key and corrected genealogy of relation of Mary Ann Phagan to the former. 'Brother James Key' denounces Trump as the AntiChrist on Youtube [My red flag - RW]

Hello Rae,

I just began a genealogy of Martin Luther. I have concluded that Luther's parents were siblings. His paternal grandmom and maternal grandmom appear to me to be the same the same person. I looked at Geni's family tree of Luther. His paternal grandmom was named Anna Margaretha Ziegler. Geni - Anna Margaretha von Luder (Ziegler) (1434-1521)- Möhra His maternal grandmom was named Margarethe Ziegler Geni - Margarethe Ziegler (c.1425-1521) They both died on the exact same date, September 21, 1521. They are both listed as having the same dad, Ritter Otto Ziegler Rebstock. Geni - Ritter Otto Ziegler zum Rebstock (c.1421-1517) It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that they were the same person. This would mean that Luther's parents were literally at least half siblings.

It seems that these crypto-Jewish families practice extreme inbreeding to the point of literal incest, and make slight name changes to deceive people into thinking that it is mere cousin unions.

I believe that Luther was a crypto-Jew, whose purpose in inventing Protestantism was to divide and conquer the hated white race.

Mathis has already asserted pretty much the same thing. But he did not point out that Luther's parents were probably siblings. Mathis said that Pope Leo X was in on the plot. He might have been, but it does not appear to me to be the case that Luther and Pope Leo were close relatives. I just worked on a genealogy of the pope and he did not appear to have recent German ancestry.

Paul

I don't know if you know about this already or not, but a quasi-Communist Jew run website called Salon, in America, published an article by an alleged pedophile named Todd Nickerson, called I am a pedophile but not a monster where he argued that pedophiles who refrain from sexually abusing children should be socially accepted, even if they are open about their pedophilia. The article is not Salon anymore, but here is a link to another edition of the same article, I’m a Pedophile, but Not a Monster - Alternet.org   [Note: it's a 2015 article—RW]

The purpose of this article is clearly to cause pedophiles to be socially accepted, so as to cause social harm, including child sexual abuse, as a result of the acceptance of them. But I believe that that is not the ultimate purpose. I believe that the ultimate purpose is to make the public angry about the normalization of pedophilia and child sexual abuse, so that there will be a reaction against it, and there will be an anti-pedophile movement that will be used as controlled opposition. This is basically what QAnon is. This is not my original idea, others have discussed it, including John Blanchette, the owner of the youtube channel Ephesians 5:11 Ministries. E511 Ministries - YouTube Blanchette refuses to name the Jew, most likely because he is one of them, but he basically says what I say except without naming the Jew.   [Note: I don't like linking to Youtube because of its heavy censorship policy, and promotion of trash—RW]

Jews run all the major pornographic websites, they own Hollywood and produce the quasi-pornographic films that it peddles. Over 90% of trashy quasi-pornographic romance novels are by Jews. The promotion of sexual perversion and sexual immorality generally largely comes from Jews. I believe that the Jews promoting these things intend a backlash against them to come, so that they use another dupe or agent, similar to Hitler, as a controlled opposition figure. Although Jews have promoted normalizing pedophilia, as in Nickerson's article, Jews have been behind raising the minimum legal age for sex, both historically and currently, through the feminist movement. Feminism is a Jewish movement, and it was feminists who caused the average minimum legal age for sex in states of the United States to be changed from ten to sixteen, and they ultimately wanted it to be raised to eighteen. Wikipedia says in its article
Age of consent reform - Wikipedia
Age of consent reform: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
In 1880, 37 states had an age of consent of 10 years, 10 states had an age of consent at 12 years, and Delaware had an age of consent of 7 years.[23][24] In the late-19th century, a "social purity movement" composed of Christian feminist reform groups began advocating a raise in the age of consent to 16, with the goal of raising it ultimately to 18. By 1920, 26 states had an age of consent at 16, 21 states had an age of consent at 18, and one state (Georgia) had an age of consent at 14.[25]

Amanda Marcotte, a Jewish feminist, on Salon, wrote an article demanding that the minimum legal age for sex be raised to eighteen years in all of the USA, A national age of consent? After Roy Moore, maybe it's time | Salon.com

So Jews promote two opposite sides in a dialectic on this matter. One side comes very close to openly promoting legalizing child sexual abuse, the other promotes increasing the minimum legal age for sex. I believe that the reason for this is that the purpose of the Jews who promote allowing child sexual abuse is to offend the masses so that they will embrace their controlled opposition agent, who will claim to be rescuing the world from child sexual abuse.

QAnon is very focused on combating child sexual abuse and many believe that Trump is Q. I don't know if he is, but it would kind of make sense.

Todd Nickerson, the author of the pro-pedophilia article that I referenced, is a Jew from a very inbred family. He is 8x great grandson of Rabbi Jacob Franks, and is grandson of a Hess, the latter relation might connect him to Rudolf Hess. Nickerson is son of Sheila June Ross, through her, grandson of Mava June Hess. Through her, great grandson of Marie Franks. Through her, 2x great grandson of Frank Franks. Through him, 3x great grandson of Emmanuel Franks. Through him, 4x great grandson of David Franks. Through him, 5x great grandson of Isaac Franks. Through him, 6x great grandson of Henry Taylor Franks. Through him, 7x great grandson of Michael Franks. Through him, 8x great grandson of Rabbi Jacob Franks.

Paul

I believe that the true purpose of the Russian invasion of Ukraine is to cause a refugee crisis, so as to force millions of Ukrainians to immigrate to western Europe and America. This will cause there to be a Ukrainian group present in these countries who will lobby for the benefit of their group, to the detriment of their host countries. This is already in existence, and was so long before this war, the war is just exacerbating the problem. The fixation on the holodomor by many on the right wing is almost entirely a result of Ukrainian immigrants promoting the holodomor narrative. This is true even if the holodomor is real.

Slaviuk, an assistant economics professor at National University Kiev-Mohyla Academy, stated in in an interview with the International Labor Organization:

[begin quote]   The migration of Ukrainians is massive, indeed. According to UNHCR data from 19 July, roughly 6 million Ukrainian refugees were recorded across Europe, 3.7 million of them registering for temporary protection. According to the Gradus research, in the first wave of migration in May 73 per cent of respondents (migrants) wanted to return home at the first opportunity. In June, this number decreased to 62 per cent, though the number of those who wanted to stay at the new place of residence decreased from 12 to 8 per cent. A quarter of the respondents do not know what to do. At the same time, according to a survey conducted by Work.ua, 59 per cent of Ukrainian refugees were looking for a job in the country of temporary stay.   [end quote]

Ukraine crisis: How does the war against Ukraine impact employment and migration? (ilo.org)

We have had similar patterns of immigration, historically, causing similar problems. The Irish mass immigrated to America, Canada and the island of Great Britain because of the Potato Famine. I am NOT saying that we should treat the Irish as aliens today or that they should be viewed in the same way as Jews or black Africans or other non-white groups are views, but in the past, they did cause problems. Again, that is not to say that this should be held against them today, it is only to be aware of past problems, so that we can understand and prepare for future problems. Another example is that the Jews of Eastern Europe were forced into mass immigration into western Europe and America by the Romanov Tsarist regime's persecution of Jewry. I believe that the Romanovs were crypto-Jews and that the primary purpose of their persecution of the Jews was to force them to move to western Europe and America, so that Jewish power could be expanded in those countries.

I believe that Putin and Zelensky are intentionally continuing this war so that they can force Ukrainians to mass emigrate to Europe and America, so that the Ukrainian emigrants will cause similar problems to the ones caused by Irish, Jewish, Italian, etc immigrants, immigrants to western countries in the past.

Paul

Hello Rae,

I just learned that King Louis XVI Bourbon of France was 10x great grandson of Amadeus VIII Savoy, the member of the Savoy family who obtained the Turin shroud for that family. King Louis XVI Bourbon of France was the son of Louis Ferdinand de Bourbon, through him, grandson of King Louis XV Bourbon of France, through him, great grandson of Maria Adelaide Savoy, through her, 2x great grandson of Victor Amadeus II Hertog van Savoye, through him, 3x great grandson of Charles Emmanuel II Savoy, through him, 4x great grandson of Viktor Amadeus Savoy, through him, 5x great grandson of Carlo Savoy, through him, 6 x great grandson of Emmanuel Savoy. Through him, 7x great grandson of Carlos III Savoy. Through him, 8x great grandson of Phillipe Savoy. Through him, 9x great grandson of Louis Savoy. Through him, 10 x great grandson of Amadeus VIII Savoy.

When King Louis XVI was allegedly beheaded, someone in the crowd, according to the story, picked up his head and shouted 'Jacques de Molay, thou art avenged'.

Based on the genealogical connections I have shown between Molay, King Phillip IV of France and Amadeus VIII, combined with the research of Knight and Lomas in The Second Messiah, I have come to the conclusion that those authors were correct that it is Molay's face on the Turin shroud and that the image resulted from a mock crucifixion that Molay was subjected to in which his body was put in contact with a shroud. However, I believe that Molay was coerced into complying with the mock crucifixion through blackmail, possibly on the basis of sexual crimes that he had committed, and that the mock crucifixion was a hazing ritual. I believe that Molay was not killed. In the standard narrative, he was killed in 1314 through burning at the stake. This was much later than his mock crucifixion, which was in 1307. I believe that the use of burning at the stake as the method of killing was to give an alibi for why there was no corpse, they could claim that the fire cremated the corpse.

The fact that Louis was related to Amadeus makes it highly likely that the alleged execution of the king was another hoax and part of a broader psyop linked to the mock crucifixion of de Molay and the hoaxed execution of the latter, especially when combined with the person in the crowd shouting 'Jacques de Molay, thou art avenged,' and de Molay supposedly having cursed the French royal family while burning at the stake.

I showed the family trees, but did not put in written form the descent connecting King Phillip to Amadeus, so will write that in this email.

Amadeus VIII Savoy was 3x great grand nephew of King Phillip Capet of France.

King Phillip IV Capet of France was son of King Phillip III Capet of France, the latter was the dad of Charles Valois. Charles Valois was dad of King Phillip Valois VI of France. King Phillip VI was dad of Jean de France II. Jean de France was dad of Jean de Berry. Jean de Berry was dad of Bonne. Bonne was mom of Amadeus Savoy VIII.

King Phillip had close Bourbon relatives. I'm certain that he was related to King Louis XVI, I am going to find the exact connection soon.

Paul

Files: Attachments-King Louis XVI of France was 10x great grandson of Amadeus Savoy VIII, statements on other genealogical connections that I discussed, this is congruous with Mathis's view that the execution of the Bourbo.zip

Hello Rae,
King Louis XVI of France was 16x great grandson of King Phillip IV of France

I worked out the descent of King Louis XVI Bourbon of France from King Phillip IV Capet of France. The former was the 16x great grandson of the latter.

King Louis XVI Bourbon of France was son of Louis Ferdinand de Bourbon, through him, grandson of King Louis XV Bourbon of France, through him, great grandson of Louis Bourbon de Bourgogne. Through him, 2x great grandson of Louis Bourbon the grand dauphin. Through him, 3x great grandson of King Louis XIV Bourbon of France. Through him, 4x great grandson of King Louis XIII Bourbon of France. Through him, 5x great grandson of King Henry IV Bourbon of France. Through him, 6x great grandson of Queen Jeane III of Navarre. Through her, 7x great grandson of King Henry II of Navarre. Through him 8 great grandson of John King. Through him, 9x great grandson of Alain de Grand d'Albret, Comte de Gavre. Through him, 10x great grandson of Jean Catherine Rohan. Through her, 11x great grandson of Marguerite Montfort. Through her, 12x great grandson of Joanna Richmond (of Navarre), Queen (consort) of England. Through her, 13x great grandson of King Carlos II de Navarre. Through him, 14x great grandson of Joan II of France and Navarre. Through her, 15x great grandson of King Louis X Capet of France. Through him, 16x great grandson of King Phillip IV Capet of France.

Paul

Files: Attachments-King Louis XVI of France was 16x great grandson of King Phillip IV of France.zip

Hello Rae,

I just learned, through my genealogical research, that a Scottish judge and nobleman, John Marshall, Lord Curriehill, was the 2x great granddad of the wife of the nephew of Adolf Hitler.
      Adolf Hitler was the son of Alois Hitler. Alois Hitler was the dad of Alois Hitler, Junior. Alois Hitler, Junior was the dad of William Patrick Hitler. William Patrick Hitler was the husband of Phyllis Jean Jacques. She was daughter of Dorothy Marshall, through her, granddaughter of William Stephen Marshall, through him, great grand daughter of William Marshall, through him, 2 x great granddaughter of John Marshall.
      John Marshall was a Scottish judge and aristocrat. John Marshall, Lord Curriehill - Wikipedia

Hitler almost certainly had close family relations with prominent British aristocrats and elites, based on this. Almost certainly many of these elites understood themselves to be crypto-Jews. This increases the chances that Hitler was either a dupe of, or an agent of, British elites that were ultimately crypto-Jewish. He was a Jewish agent, whether he understood it, or not, as you said in your interview about Hitler, but your interviewer was partially correct in calling him a British agent, even though you said 'I wouldn't say he was a British agent, I would say he was a Jewish agent,' in the sense that these Jews were working out of London as their base of operations, it makes their project a British one in a geographical one.

I am almost certain that I will find more family connections between Hitler and British elites soon.

Paul
2 attachments

Literal incestuous unions in Hitler's ancestry and in Rockefeller's ancestry
I just learned that Adolf Hitler's 4x paternal great grandparents were literally brother and sister. They were Johann George Hitler and his wife Katherine Elizabeth Hitler, both the children of George Michael Heidler and his wife Maria Heidler.
      Adolf Hitler was the son of Alois Hitler, through him, the grandson of Johann George Hiedler, through him, the great grandson of Martinus Heidler, through him, the 2x great grandson of Johannes Hiedler, through him, the 3x great grandson of Stephan Hiedler, through him, the 4x great grandson of Johann George Hielder and his wife Katherine Elizabeth Hiedler, both the children of George Michael Heidler and his wife Maria Heidler.
      When I screenshot Johann George Hitler's profile it only said Johann, and did not include his middle name George, it is the same man. For the last photo, spellcheck corrected Johann George's surname to 'Hustler,' unfortunately.
      We see the same thing in the Rockefeller family. Nelson Rockefeller's paternal 8x great grandparents were literal brother and sister. Nelson Rockefeller was the son of John D. Rockefeller Jr, through him, the grandson of John D. Rockefeller, through him, the great grandson of William Avery Rockefeller, through him, the 2x great grandson of Godrey Lewis Rockefeller, through him, the 3x great grandson of William Oscar Rockefeller, through him, the 4x great grandson of Johann Simeon Rockefeller, through him, the 5x great grandson of Johann Thiel Rockefeller, through him, the 6x great grandson of Thoengess Anthonius Rockenfeller, through him, the 7x great grandson of Johannes Pieter Rockefeller, through him, the 8x great grandson of Goddard de Rockenfeller and Magdalena Goddard. Goddard de Rockenfeller and Magdalena Goddard Rockenfeller were both the children of Augier Rockenfeller and his wife Magdalena Goddard.
      The similar incestuous unions in both the Hitler and Rockefeller families increases the chances that they are related. It is interesting, too, because it is very probably the explanation for the mental problems that both politicians suffered. Nelson Rockefeller had dyslexia and had a personality disorder that caused people to intensely dislike him. Hitler had a personality disorder that made people dislike him, too, and the latter struggled in high school, and ended up failing out. I believe that Hitler had at least average intelligence, but he had some kind of mental problem causing him difficulty with the scholastic or he would not have failed out of high school. The incestuous unions in his ancestry likely explain these mental defects. I believe that the reason for the elite often having mental problems like autism, schizophrenia, dyslexia, etc and for their often being sexually perverted, is that incestuous unions in their ancestry have caused rare extremely harmful genes that under normal circumstances it would be virtually impossible to replicate, to be replicated, and cause the descendants to have these problems. I do not believe that first cousin matings would be likely to cause these kinds of problems, I believe that incestuous unions would be needed for these kinds of genetic problems to be likely to occur. Likely our elite, and many non-elite, covertly practice incestuous unions.
      NB: I'm not saying that Hitler was aware of the incestuous unions in his ancestry, nor am I saying that he was aware of his relation to the Rockefellers or of his Jewish ancestry. But even if he was not aware of these things, he was certainly manipulated by crypto-Jews around him who knew of these things.

Paul
8 attached files Hitlers' 2x great grandparents were siblings, too

I had an online correspondent, who died a few days ago, Siegfried Bleher, a former chief executive officer of a Silicon valley company, like you, he wrote a computer programming book. He was a veteran of the US air force in the Vietnamese war, and the son of a veteran of the German air force in the second world war on the Soviet front. I did a family tree of him, his paternal grandmom was a Heller. Heller, according to Mathis, is the original variation of Hitler's surname. I am now corresponding with Karl Duncan, a cousin of Bleher's. I believe that Bleher's tree links him to Johann Andreas Eisenmenger, a famous antiJewish author in the seventeenth century. I might discover new evidence through this genealogical research regarding Hitler's suspicious family connections.

Paul

Hitler was friends with a woman named Karoline Helwig and her daughter Rosa Bernie. He met them during his celebration of his forty fourth birthday, on April 20, 1933, they were standing outside his house while he was celebrating it. Hitler noticed Rosa, and her mom told the former that it was her daughter's sixth birthday. Hitler, according to the story, enjoyed the coincidence and the attractive appearance of her daughter, so he invited them to his house, and his personal photographer Hoffman, took photographs of the girl and Hitler together. The girl and her mom were frequent visitors at Hitler's house until 1938. The girl was of partial Jewish ancestry. Her maternal grandmom was a Jew, so she was 25% Jewish, according to the story. Hitler's advisors banned him from continuing to interact with her, in 1938, because they considered her a Jew, therefore worried that his interacting with her would make people suspicious of him.

I find this story to be suspicious, but not for the same reason that others have found it suspicious. I am not the first person to find this to be evidence of Hitler being controlled opposition, but I might be the first to have the specific reason that I will state. What I find suspicious is not so much Hitler associating with a person of partial Jewish ancestry, he could just be associating with her out of politeness, what I find suspicious is the fact that Hoffmann took photographs of Hitler with the girl and made sure to thoroughly document Hitler's association with the girl. It makes it seem to me that either Hitler, or at least people around him, wanted people to eventually figure out that German nationalism was Jewish and controlled opposition, and to that end this crew were trying to incriminate Hitler in any way possible.

I have noticed that there is almost no genealogical information on Rosa Bernie Nienau, just enough to prove that she was 25% Jew. And she died during her eighteenth year, of polio. That is very suspicious. Infectious diseases are often a means of hoaxing deaths, and this crew often hoax deaths at young ages for the purpose of disappearing, so that their frauds can not be discovered. It seems to me like this girl was essentially an actress, whose purpose interacting with Hitler was to provide evidence for the latter being a crypto-Jew and controlled opposition.

This is a video about the girl and her association with Hitler. Hitler's "Jewish Daughter" - YouTube

Another possible reason for this, though this is speculation on my part, is that this crew wanted people to think that Hitler was either a pedophile or at least had pedophilic tendencies. Superficially, Hitler seems to have an abnormal interest in this child in the photos of them. This may have been manufactured by this crew to promote the meme that the political elites are either pedophiles or have pedophilic tendencies. I believe that you and Mathis would both agree with me that Jeffrey Epstein's case is a hoax. Although that case involved older minors, so would not, strictly speaking, be about pedophilia, it was manufactured for a similar purpose, I think, to convince the public that the political elite are all sexually interested in young people and to label them 'pedophilic' in a broader, colloquial sense of the term.

Paul

Hello Rae,

I do agree with the idea that our educational system has deliberately been made bad. But I disagree with a specific idea postulated, that it has made the students dumber. I would say that the non-genetic factors determining differences in intelligence are almost entirely biological factors such as sleep, nutrition, etc. I believe that education, beyond basic things like reading, writing and arithmetic, is irrelevant to intelligence. This is related to the topic of my last email. The people who claim that the Rockefeller brothers had dyslexia because of Dewey's bad educational methods, will claim often that the Rockefellers imposed a generally bad method of education, which ruined children's ability to learn and dumbed them down. I believe that schooling has little impact on intelligence, with the exception of the teaching of basic things like arithmetic.

I do believe that our educational system has deliberately been made harmful. But the harm is making people study irrelevant things, and keeping them in school too long, not making them dumber.

People who claim that making students dumber is part of what is happening are promoting the equalitarian agenda of the Bolshevist Jews. And this idea does do harm to our educational system. I am not saying that education is useless, only that it does not make a person more intelligent. Knowledge is not intelligence. Schools need to take people's limitations into account more, and when people pretend that schools can turn anyone into an Aristotle, a Goethe or a Newton, it causes problems like people of vastly differing levels of abilities in the same classrooms, and students flunking out because they are studying subjects that they are not competent for.

I was reminded of this point because of a post I saw claiming that Judeo-Communists 'dumbed down' students. They did wreck our educational system, but saying that they made the students dumber is not the right way to put it, I think.

Paul

Hello Rae, I was looking at an article on your site. It said:

I disagree with this. It probably is a bad method of reading, but it seems irrelevant to dyslexia, to me. Dyslexia seems to be entirely a genetically caused problem to me. It as a lot of similarities to dyspraxia, which means poor motor skills, and that seems to be a genetically caused problem, in some ways it is similar to autism, dyslexic tend to have repetitive behavior, lack of social understanding and trouble with thinking similar to those of autistics. I would be more inclined to believe that heredity is what causes dyslexia. [Personal material deleted]

Nelson Rockefeller had dyslexia, and so did his siblings, some authors blamed this on John Dewey's method of teaching reading, but a more likely cause is inbreeding causing dyslexia. A right wing author, Blumenfeld, wrote an article blaming the dyslexia of the Rockefeller brothers on Dewey's bad teaching methods, Confessions of a Dyslexic Internationalist - The New American. I disagree with Blumenfeld, and I see him as perhaps deceitful rather than misguided.

Maybe the misattribution of the cause of dyslexia is a Jewish trick, to get society believing that differences in mental abilities are determined by social factors, rather than genetic ones. Blumenfeld is a Jew, and maybe his motivation in blaming Dewey's teaching methods for the Rockefeller brothers' dyslexia is to brainwash society into believing that differences in mental abilities are determined by how society treats people, rather than genetics. I have noticed that much of the kosher right wing like to attack the Rockefellers and their associates and blame them for bad educational policies. The reason might be in order to cover up the genetic basis of differences in mental abilities. NB: I'm not saying that I favor the look say method, I am only saying that I feel that the harm that it causes has been exaggerated.

Paul

Rae,

Since I discussed my expulsion from Carthage College and my threatening emails to the teachers there that caused my criminal prosecution and conviction, I was reminded of a view that I have held for a long time, that college is essentially a scam. The vast majority of college graduates end up in jobs where a college degree is irrelevant, and are burdened for the rest of their lives with debt. They would have been better off, economically, working from a young age, than spending time in college that kept them out of the labor force.

The average white person has an Intelligence Quotient of about 100. According to Richard Lynn, in his book The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence, the average Ashkenazi Jews has an Intelligence Quotient of about 110. That's probably an exaggeration, but even if that were true, the average person with an Intelligence Quotient of 110 would not be able to easily handle college, and even if he graduated, it would not expand his opportunities much in the job market. A 125 IQ is about the minimum needed to do well in a good college and to translate a college degree into a well paying job. It seems to me like college is an intentional Jewish elite scam to put the masses in debt and make them unemployable and delay their marriage and procreation.

What do you think?

Paul

I recently started studying the Noahide laws, seven rabbinical statutes that many of the Jews want to impose on Gentiles. One of them is a ban on idol worship, and the punishment for violating that ban is debatably the death penalty. Trump's daughter Ivanka, and her husband Jared Kushner, are members of Chabad Lubavitch, a Jewish denomination that openly promotes the Noahide laws.

The AntiDefamation League openly promoted the USA adopting the Noahide laws at least as far back as 1999. Vincent Bruno wrote:
      [begin quote]   ... If you remember, back in 1999, two Jewish law groups and a Noahidist lawyer team submitted an amici curiae (friend of the court) brief to the Supreme Court suggesting that the United States use decapitation as the primary mode of execution in the United States (here); beheading is the called for method of execution under Noahide Laws. Later, the same lawyer team introduced the Supreme Court to the Noahide Laws at the launch of a new Jewish law organization (here). However, this would not be the last time the Supreme Court would hear about the Noahide Laws as in 2005 the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) submitted another amici curiae brief to the Supreme Court in Orden v. Perry that said the Noahide Laws are "binding on the entire human race".   [end quote]

Stop Noahide Law: Anti-Defamation League tells Supreme Court Noahide Law is "binding on the entire human race"

I think this information should go in my file about the ADL on your site. - Paul

Hi Rae,

I believe that the Islamic sharia law is essentially the Noahide laws promulgated for Mohammedan Arabs. Dr Omer Saleem, a Muslim, wrote:

[begin quote]   Allah is instructing that there is no contention or dispute “between us Muslims and you Jews” because all revelations come from the same source—Allah. Some might say, but the Qur’an says that the Prophet Muhammad was sent to all mankind, to Arabs and non-Arabs, Jews and Christians, and all must follow him. To that the Qur’an tells us that every prophet came with a general message and a specific message. The general message is meant for all mankind, this is the Deen (universal law) of Islam. Deen is comparable to the universal Noahide laws. In this regard there is no distinction between the prophets.
...
There is ample room in Islam to accept Jews, Christians, and Noahides fully as they are, encouraging them to cleave to their faiths and prophets.   [end quote]

Saleem openly said, essentially, that Islam is a Noahide religion. This was discussed in an article, Rebecca Abrahamson. "Dr. Omer Salem, A Bridge for Peace?". Arutz Sheva.

[begin quote]   Determined to pursue peace with the Jewish people, Egyptian Muslim sheikh, Dr. Omer Salem, just completed a whirlwind tour of Israel.
...
At his speech at the Jewish Agency, Salem stated that Islam has no theological conflict with Judaism. He notes that Islam does have a long standing dispute with Christianity over two topics. One – the trinity is viewed by believing Muslims as idolatrous. Two - Christians wish to proselytize to Muslims. Judaism is considered strictly monotheistic, and does not call for proselytizing any more than spreading the Seven Noahide Laws, which Muslims already keep.   [end quote]

Also from that article:

[begin quote]   As to what motivated him to get involved in Jewish-Muslim rapprochement, Salem sees the Arab-Israeli conflict as central to solving the conflicts in the Middle East. “I have friends and family back in Egypt, I want them and my people to be at peace and to prosper, and I see making peace with the people of Israel as key.” He has condensed his proposals in his new book, The Missing Peace, the Role of Religion in the Arab Israeli Conflict.

He holds that any solution in the region must be based upon scripture, both Torah and Qur’an, as this is what ultimately unites Muslims and Jews both theologically and historically. ”Read!” he insisted to the students at the Young Ambassadors high school program, Petach Tikvah, “check out the sources for yourselves!” “This really impressed me” one student remarked, and the idea that Islam can indeed support a Jewish state was new information to them.   [end quote]
Lieber, a rabbi, stated:

[begin quote]   I told him that the Torah starts with our common humanity in the story of Adam, where we are told that all of humanity is created in the image of God. Judaism sees itself as having a role to play in the story of humanity, but not that everyone should be Jewish. Our role is to awaken certain values and a connection from God to humanity, which we see for example in the seven Noahide laws. We see in Islam a fulfillment of that vision.   [end quote]

A Yemenite rabbi, el-Fayyumi, said in the twelfth century after Christ, that Islam was an acceptable Gentile religion, because it was Noahide.

[begin quote]   Nevertheless, there is a minority view which believes that non-Jews can still receive prophecy. It is this position that led Natanel al-Fayyumi, a 12th-century Yemenite rabbi, to suggest that God established an eternal covenant with Moses and the Children of Israel, but that He also established a covenant with Muhammad and the Muslims.
...
Additionally, al-Fayyumi finds it critically important to reiterate the Torah's warning that if a prophet comes to change the laws of the Torah, he is not to be seen as a prophet for the Jewish people. Seeing that many of the laws and ideas in Islam are contrary to those of Judaism, and that the language of the Quran is different to that of the Torah, al-Fayyumi holds that a Jew must remain a Jew. However, the fact that the Seven Laws of Noah (a moral code passed down to Noah from God for non-Jews) are stated in the Quran, may suggest that Islam is a Noahide religion for non-Jews.   [end quote]

From the same article:

[begin quote]   However, according to al-Fayyumi, this does not mean that Jews should become Muslims, for he writes in his book, Garden of Intellects: "A proof that God sends a prophet to every people according to their language is found in this passage of the Quran, 'We sent a prophet only according to the language of his people.' Consequently had God sent a prophet to us [Jews], he would have surely been of our language."

What al-Fayyumi is stressing here is that he believes that the non-Jewish prophet, although a messenger of God, is nonetheless not part of Judaism. According to al-Fayyumi, Muhammad was given prophecies meant for non-Jews, and when God wanted to send a message to the Jews, He sent it with a Jewish prophet.   [end quote]
Sina Cohen (2014). "How should non-Jewish prophets be viewed?". The JC. 22 June 2014. How should non-Jewish prophets be viewed? - The Jewish Chronicle (thejc.com)

I found all those articles from Vincent Bruno's article here, Stop Noahide Law: A growing alliance between Noahide Law and Muslim Sharia

Bruno wrote an article about how Palestinian leaders are negotiating the adoption by the largely Muslim Palestinians of the Noahide laws. Stop Noahide Law: Palestinian academic leaders working with Sanhedrin for Noahide Law

[begin quote]   The unofficial Sanhedrin in Israel is seeking to build itself up to be the highest legal court of Judaism with jurisdiction over Noahides, they are converting non-Jews, calling themselves and special hereditary priesthood, and openly state their aim is to see the fall of all other religions on earth (here). They have built a Noahide organization called the "70 Nations" which seeks to replace the United Nations with an international Noahide court (here). They have asked President Trump to bring the Noahide Laws to the USA (here). There has already been efforts to evangelize the Noahide Laws to Palestinians (here), but now it seems that an unnamed (for safety) academic leader has rounded up a group of students who believe in the Noahide mission of the Sanhedrin and are willing to collaborate. They are seeking representatives from every nation on earth... and it seems like they are getting there.   [end quote] Emphasis added was mine.

The Sanhedrin has received responses from several nations since the conference from the most unexpected sources; a Pashtun political figure from Afghanistan, Nigeria, Cameroon, and others. One such response came from a respected academic Palestinian scholar who lives in Judea. The scholar must remain anonymous since there are elements in the Palestinian Authority and in Palestinian society that use violent methods against Palestinians who advocate “normalization” of relations between Jews and Arabs (i.e. coexistence between Muslims and Jews).

“He contacted the Sanhedrin and wants to work with us. He has a group of students he is educating to follow this path,” Rabbi Hillel Weiss, spokesman for the Sanhedrin, told Breaking Israel News. “He recognizes the Biblical basis for Israel and accepts them. He accepts that the only legitimate rule in the land of Israel is from the Jews and that the historical truth that Jewish Temples once stood on the Temple Mount. He wants the Palestinian people to be part of the Organization of 70 nations and is aware this includes a Biblically mandated Sanhedrin, court of nations, and a Third Temple as a House of Prayer for all nations.”

Palestinians Turn to Sanhedrin Organization of 70 Nations, Accept Role in Third Temple By Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz October 30, 2019 Breaking Israel News Palestinians Turn to Sanhedrin Organization of 70 Nations, Accept Role in Third Temple - Israel365 News

The Palestinian people are a concept that, in my view, was created to justify opposition to Zionism. There was no idea of a specifically Palestinian people prior to the Zionist colonization of Palestine beginning, they were just Arabs before. I'm not saying that the Zionist regime does not oppress these people or that I support Zionism. But the fact that the Palestinians are being invited freely to participate in the Noahide law promulgation is interesting, it suggests that Zionism is not the end game for the Jews. It is congruous with something Timothy Fitzpatrick, who I believe you are already familiar with, has suggested, that Jews intend to throw the Zionist state of Israel under the bus, and to scapegoat white European Christians by blaming the crimes of that state on Christianity and the Anglo-Americans, and then to create a new, still essentially Jewish state, to replace Israel after they have thrown the latter under the bus, the new state will be free of 'the pesky taint of Zionism' and will help to promulgate the Noahide laws worldwide. This strategy would make sense, if Judaism is ultimately a pagan mystery religion, as it seems to be. Fitzpatrick stated:

[Begin quote]   'If Judaism is ultimately a pagan religion, then they can throw "Israel" under the bus as a so called British-American creation, and re-establish it under new terms and descriptors that help spread paganism worldwide, be it under Noahide rule, Kabbalah, etc.'   [end quote]

Fitzpatrick Informer ???????? on Twitter: "If Judaism is ultimately a pagan religion, then they can throw "Israel" under the bus as a so called British-American creation, and re-establish it under new terms and descriptors that help spread paganism worldwide, be it under Noahide rule, Kabbalah, etc." / Twitter Paul

My research into the Noahide laws has made me begin to suspect that the purpose of Christianity, or at least of the perverted form of it that most Christians today are influenced by or follow, was to give the Jews an excuse to accuse white Europeans people of being idolators, so that the former would have an excuse to persecute or even mass murder the latter. Christians were duped into worshipping an idol, and this gives Jews the excuse that they need to persecute them.

Paul

The authors believe that Molay was tortured by William Imbert, chief inquisitor of King Phillip IV of France. The latter outlawed the Knights Templar and forced the pope to support his suppression of the Templars. The authors believe that the king was motivated mostly by malice and greed, in his outlawing of the Templars, but that his inquisitor was a Christian offended by the Templars' denial of the divinity of Jesus. Knight and Lomas concluded that Imbert tortured Molay in a parody of the crucifixion of Jesus, as punishment for his denial of the divinity of Jesus.

The authors said that the Knights Templar denied the divinity of Jesus, but believed in and worshipped Yahweh or Jehvoah, the God of the Old Testament. This would essentially be Noahidism. As evidence for their conclusion, they point out that Molay and the other Templar leaders vehemently denied that they had engaged in homosexual acts or other perverse sexual acts, even when being tortured to coerce them into confession to those offenses, but that they freely admitted to denying the divinity of Jesus. At the time, Christians usually did not view homosexual conduct as a serious sin, while they viewed denial of Jesus's divinity as one of the worst possible sins. Molay and the other Templars denied the less serious offense, but admitted freely to the more serious one. That must be because the charge that they denied the divinity of Jesus was true. Since the Knights Templar were the forerunners of Freemasonry, this would support what Adam Green and Vincent Bruno say about Freemasons being Noahides.

I strongly suspect that this was a deception that the Templar leaders, the king of France and the pope were arranging together. I suspect that Molay's alleged execution was a hoax. I agree with Knight and Lomas that the image on the Turin Shroud is Molay, but I believe that it is more likely that the torture of Molay was something he willingly complied with as a hazing ritual and to give a narrative to the masses as a psyop, a deception that Molay was complicit in. The purpose of this ritual would be to have a narrative of the Roman Catholic Church as the sinister persecutors of the true Noahide religion, and to create the cult of Molay as the second messiah. Shortly after his alleged death, there was a cult of Molay as the second messiah, if Knight, Lomas and I are correct that it is his face on the Turin shroud, then that is related to the cult.

There is very interesting information in The Second Messiah about the Hebrew ancestry of the royal families of Europe. The authors had a correspondent, another author of books on historical occult mysteries named Tim Wallace Murphy, who informed them of a correspondent who had told him that he was descended from an ancient Hebrew royal family. I will quote what they said directly, it was on page 76:

[begin quote]   As we were diggin up as many facts as we could to try deduce what might have been going on, Robert telephoned the historian and writer Dr Tim Wallace-Murphy, regarding a point of detail concerning a particular dating. We had met Tim when we were in the final stages of completing The Hiram Key and he was interested to hear about our current research. Robert explained how we had built up a picture of a broad based plan by a group of French noblemen to excavate under the ruins of Herod's temple, and how we now believed that this group knew exactly what they were looking for.

Tim listened intently and then said: 'I know you're onto something because it fits with a strange piece of information that I have had for quite some time. Just suspend your usual skepticism for a moment and listen as though I'm telling you a story, because it is attractive, but by all normal standards, it's fantastic.'

Robert was all ears. Tom told how he had just finished delivering a lecture in London some years earlier when a distinguished man of advancing years had walked up to him and introduced himself in French, a language in which Tim is fluent. He claimed that he was a direct descendant of the Templar leader, Hugues de Payen, and that he felt it appropriate to communicate some information that might be helpful. Tim intuitively felt that the man was not a charlatan and decided to listen. His first impressions were confirmed by the gentleman's soft and unassuming style of speech and his clear insight into a subject that few understood in any detail.

Here is the strange story that Tim heard. When this man reached the age of twenty-one, his father called him to one side and informed him that he was about to share in secret knowledge that he would have to pass onto his son when he reached the same age. He heard that there exists an ancient verbal tradition that had been passed down from father to chosen son in his family, and certain other families, for thousands of years. ...

At the time even before Jesus was born, the priests of the temple of Jerusalem ran two schools: one for boys and one for girls. The priests were known by titles which were the names of angels, such as...Gabriel. This was the way in which they preserved the pure lines of Levi and David. When each of the chosen girls had passed through puberty one of the priests would impregnate her with the seed of the holy bloodline, and once pregnant, she would be married off to a respectable man to bring up the child. It was the custom that when these children reached the age of seven years they were handed back to the temple schools to be educated by the priests.

Thus, stated the Frenchman, was a virgin called Mary visited by the priest known as 'Angel Gabriel' who had her with child. She was then married off to Joseph, who was a far older man.

According to this verbal tradition, Mary found it difficult to enjoy life with Joseph, her first husband, because he was far too old for her, but, over time, she grew to love him and had another four boys and three girls.

After Jesus was crucified the main pillars of the Jerusalem church were James the Just supported by Peter and John, the beloved disciple...
...
After the killing of James, and before the final destruction of the temple, some of the Nazarene priesthood fled first to Greece, then from there they scattered throughout Europe...
...
The group of survivors took the group designation of 'Rex Deus' (Kings of God) and they survived the persecution of the Jews by adopting the religious practices of the lands in which they lived, provided they were only required to express a belief in the one true God. They believed that they were preserving the bloodlines of the two messiahs of David and Aaron, who would one day arrive and establish the kingdom of God on earth.'   [end quote]

The quote was from pages 76-78 of The Second Messiah. The emphasis added is mine. In the emphasized statement about the crypto-Jews managing to survive persecution of Jewry by adopting the religions of their new countries, provided they only had to express belief in 'the one true God,' something essentially synonymous with Noahidism is being referenced.

The elite families of Europe are very substantially infiltrated by this bloodline, the Rex Deus dynasty, I believe. Hitler once said that the Hohenzollerns, the German royal family, were of Jewish ancestry. On August 20, 1942, he said the German Emperor Wilhelm II:

[begin quote]   'On the day he dismissed Bismarck he gave a ball; in his whole attitude the heritage of his Jewish ancestry comes out in the completely cynical lack of self-control, which was characteristic of him.' [end quote]

The emphasis added was mine. That quote is on page 647 of Hitler's Table Talk. Hitler's Table Talk (nationalists.org) Even mainstream historians admit that the Romanovs were, however distantly, related to Lenin. That relation itself makes it very probable that the Romanovs were of Jewish descent, or partial Jewish descent. Mathis and I have discussed other reasons that they were almost certainly of Jewish descent or partial Jewish descent. The Romanovs were of course, close relatives of the Hohenzollerns, the Russian Emperor Nicholas II and the German Emperor Wilhelm II were first cousins. This makes it likely that the royal families of Europe are related to and infiltrated by the Rex Deus, whether the former know it, or not. As was said in Wallace-Murphy's statement, only one son each generation in each of the individual Rex Deus families was told the secret, so it could be that some of the monarchs are not aware of their relation to the Rex Deus or even of their existence, but if so they are certainly manipulated by their relatives who are consciously members of the Rex Deus.

This could explain how Hitler was manipulated, if he did not understand that he was an agent, likely he had family members who were consciously members of the group, and deceived their relatives who were not initiated into the secret. Paul

King Phillip IV's great grandmom was a Savoy

I did the family tree after I sent the email to you. I did not know when I sent the email that the king was related to the Savoy family. I suspect that the king was related to Jacques de Molay and my view is that the entire persecution of the Knights Templar and trial of Jacques de Molay and others were staged hoaxes in which everyone involved was closely related, similarly to how I believe that the murder trial of Leo Frank was a staged hoax where everyone involved was related.

I assume that you already know about the story of the Knights Templar being suppressed by the French king because you seem to already be familiar with the basic topic of Freemasonry and in some ways, at least, you seem to know more about Freemasonry than I do.

I saw your comment that you were concerned that the attention that the topic of the Noahide laws is getting might be a distraction from real issues, like the Russian-Ukrainian war and the covid fraud. It could be, but the fact that the information in The Second Messiah about the Templar belief in one God and denial of the trinity and of the divinity of Jesus is so similar to Noahidism, and the alleged execution of Jacques de Molay is so similar to the penalties for the idolators in Noahidism, makes me more inclined to think that the Noahide laws are a real threat, because that book was published in 1997, at a time when no one was focusing on Noahidism, the book does not mention Noahidism, although a sequel does, so there is clearly no agenda in the book to mislead people into worrying about Noahidism, but it provides evidence that Noahidism is a threat.

There is a sequel, called Uriel's Machine by the same authors, that mentioned that President Bush I signed a bill passed by the US Congress that said that all civilization is based on Noahidism. I own the book, though I never read much of it, but I can not currently locate it.

https://knight-lomas.com/index2.html

That is a link to the website of the authors of The Second Messiah, Uriel's Machine and The Hiram Key.

https://www.robertlomas.com/Shroud/shroud.html

That is an article from Lomas's website where he recounts the experiment he did to evidence his theory of how the Turin Shroud formed. Some of their work is dumb and non-evidenced, but they gave good reasons for believing Molay is the face on the Turin shroud.

I'm not just uncritically adopting Knight's and Lomas's views. My view is very different from theirs, they think that the conflict between the Knights Templar and the French king was real, I believe that that conflict was a staged hoax that the king and the Templar leaders, including Molay, arranged among themselves. As I said, similarly to how I believe that the murder trial of Leo Frank was a staged hoax that the defendant was complicit in. One reason that I believe this is that Molay at one point had a very good relation with King Phillip, the same king who supposedly persecuted and ultimately beheaded him. The behavior of both the king and Molay prior to the alleged persecution of the Templars was highly suspicious, generally.

I know that Knight and Lomas are Freemasons, but if you are interested in the idea of Christianity as a Jewish deception then their writings might be of interest to you, because they talk a a lot about that topic, and they even discuss the role of Jews in creating Christianity despite their pro-Jewish bias.

The member of the Savoy royal family who obtained possession of the Turin Shroud was Amadeus VIII Savoy, who was count of Savoy and later the first duke of Savoy. He was third cousin, twice removed, of King Phillip. That makes it much more likely that the Turin shroud is Molay, and that the latter's torture and the imprinting of his image on the Turin shroud were a hazing ritual that the king and his agents and de Molay arranged among themselves.

Amadeus VIII was pope, too, briefly, although later the Vatican rejected his legitimacy because his corruption embarrassed them. That proves that the Roman Catholic Church must have been complicit in the deception, too.

I suspected King Phillip was related to the Savoys when I read the book yesterday, but I only proved it within the last ten minutes. I did not know exactly how they were related until I did this tree five or ten minutes ago.

Hello Rae,

Hexzan said: [begin quote] Hitler invades Russia in June 22 1941. Stalin is totally surprised by the invasion, thus the Russian army is unprepared. [end quote]

Hitler's strategic mistakes between 1941 and 1942 in Russia were intentional. Hitler was just a lieutenant of Jewish leaders, as were Roosevelt, Stalin, Churchill, Blum, Mussolini, Franco, etc (big-lies.org)

But Hexzane's theory of the war is that Hitler and Stalin were both consciously and intentionally Jewish agents, working together to stage the war, kill as many white people as possible, and end the war in victory for the Soviet side and the latter's conquest of eastern Europe and eastern Germany.

By Hexzane's own theory, it is impossible that Stalin was surprised by the German invasion. Furthermore, Stalin had received multiple reports that a German invasion was imminent before it happened. These included from the Soviet spy in Japan, Richard Sorge, and from a German army defector to the Soviet Union, and others. I suspect that Stalin and the other government officials deliberately ignored those reports so as to cause the deaths of millions of white people in the conflict.

Paul

20 june 2023

Hello Rae,

I know that you have already read Mathis's article The Great Harry Potter Hoax potter.pdf (big-lies.org) .

I disagree with Mathis's conclusion that the books were written by a team of ghost writers. I believe that Rowling wrote them herself. Rowling stated that the story entered her mind, while on a train ride, 'fully formed. ' "The Wizard of Hogwarts." April 12, 1999. (Accio Quote!, the Largest Archive of J.K. Rowling quotes on the web) (accio-quote.org)

Rowling said in an interview:

[begin quote]
'I can remember the day in 1990 as though it is tattooed on my mind forever. The idea for the stories came to me whilst I was on one of those long train journeys travelling from the North of England to London. The amazing and magical thing is that the character of Harry just popped into my head, fully formed. Looking back, it was all quite spooky.'
[end quote] 2001: Accio Quote!, the largest archive of J.K. Rowling interviews on the web (accio-quote.org)

That sounds like automatic writing. Automatic writing is a process where a person puts himself into a meditative state, an altered state of consciousness, so as to open his mind up to automatically receiving ideas, that are believed to be telepathically communicated by spirits. The process that Rowling is describing appears to be automatic writing.

I believe that Rowling wrote the Potter series herself. Based on what she said it seems that she might have been demonically inspired.

I disagree with Christianity, but Christians who criticized her series as sinister made some valid points. For example one Christian, Robert McGee said in an interview with pastor John Hagee condemning the series as sorcery: 'if you didn't catch anything about this, and all you saw was kids are reading 734 pages of material over and over and over again, there's something abnormal about that.'

I agree with him, there is something abnormal about that.

Another thing that is abnormal is Rowling coming out of nowhere to be a best selling author, despite the books she writes being slightly better than mediocre, at best. There seems to be something demonic about that.

There is something sinister and psyoppy about her allegedly speaking out against transgenderism. I am against transgenderism, but she is saying things about that it are not helpful, and she is linking opposition to transgenderism to feminism, which causes opponents of transgenderism to think that feminism is ok. And she is obscuring the androgyny agenda that our elite have promoted from time immemorial, by pretending that transgenderism is a new problem.

In the Harry Potter books/films, there were themes about racial conflict that were obviously anti-white. The Death Eaters (supporters of Voldemort) and members of the sinister Hogwarts dormitory Slytherin were based on the Nazis, which is why they are presented as being obsessed with pure wizard blood. Voldemort is based on Hitler, his having a non-wizard dad and wizard mom while hating non-wizard humans is obviously based on Hitler's being of mixed German and Jewish ancestry while hating the Jews.

There are some references to popular sinister stereotypes about Jews, that the latter have complained about, such as the goblin bankers having big, weirdly shaped and pointy ears, similar to those of Jews. Rowling is likely a crypto-Jew, given that most famous people are such and given the anti-white agenda in her books and films, so the anti-Jewish stereotypes would be controlled opposition kinds of stereotypes. The Jews have sponsored New Agey types of controlled opposition, like David Icke, the allegedly antiJewish themes in Potter would likely be Rowling acting as a similar kind of controlled opposition as Icke.

Her career seems like a sinister psyop to me.

Paul

I just began reading Dunstans' and Williams' Grey Wolf: The Escape of Hitler. In the introduction, on page xxvii, it stated:

[begin quote]

When Adolf Hitler returned from the western front to Munich ten days after the Armistice of November 11, 1918, his bank account contained the sum total of 15 marks and 30 pfennigs (pennies)-the equivalent of less than two US dollars. Despite a public persona of austerity and selfless service to Germany, Hitler was the wealthiest man in Europe by 1945.

[end quote] Emphasis added was mine.

The authors say that the reason for his wealth was 'plunder and extortion,' but this seems implausible to me. I don't think that a head of state is able to without limit randomly steal money even from his subjects. I know that the Nazis stole a lot of money, gold, artwork, etc during the war, likely ultimately as part of a Jewish money laundering scheme, but this still can not by itself explain Hitler's vast wealth.

The only plausible explanation that I see for this is that Hitler was always wealthy, because he was related to the top Jewish families, such as the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc.

Hitler might not have known that the wealth came from connections to those families specifically, or even Jewish families, he may just have understood the wealth to be from connection to rich German families, not realizing that these families were crypto-Jews.

Paul

A Jew businessman in Nuremberg, Katzenberger, was prosecuted for, and convicted of, criminal sexual relations with a German woman, in 1942. Upon conviction, he was sentenced to death. He was allegedly executed. This story seems preposterous. The death penalty has almost never, if ever, been used as a punishment for sexual crimes in any legal system. Even rape of children has almost never, if ever, been punished with the death penalty. Under the Nuremberg law criminalizing non-marital sexual relations between Germans and Jews, the only penalties possible were prison with hard labor or prison without hard labor. There is no way that this was a real case. This is yet more proof that the German nationalist regime was Jew sponsored controlled opposition, and it seems to reduce the possibilities in relation to Hitler to him either being a complete fool, or a conscious Jewish controlled opposition agent.

Katzenberger Trial - Wikipedia

Paul

The Law for the Protection of German Blood and Honor (colloquially known as the Nuremberg laws), article 2, stated:

The death penalty was not even an option for that crime.

The Decree Against Public enemies, article 4, stipulated death as an option, but not the only option:
'4. Use of Conditions of War as Grounds to Increase Criminal Penalties
Anyone who commits a crime using the special circumstances induced by the condition of war will be punished, overstepping the normal legal penalties, with penitentiary of up to 15 years, with life in prison, or with death in accordance with the requirements of sound popular judgment [gesundes Volksempfinden] or the need to especially repudiate the criminal act..'

Decree against Public Enemies | Holocaust Encyclopedia (ushmm.org)

The court stated:

At best, the death penalty was technically an option for Katzenberg's crime.

But, again, there is no way that any legal system is giving the death penalty for sexual crimes, unless the said crimes involve something like attempted murder. So we already know enough about this case to know that it is a staged hoax, and this is yet more proof that German nationalism was controlled opposition, whether Hitler knew that or not.

I just checked out a book from my local library about Katzenberger's case. The title is The Maiden and the Jew: The Story of a Fatal Friendship in Nazi Germany, the author is Kohl and the English translator is Barrett.
      I learned in the book that Irene Scheffler, the German woman who Katzenberger was convicted of the crime of sexual relations with, was the daughter of a woman who was believed to have Jewish ancestry, the latter's maiden surname was Friedlander. Irene Scheffler's dad, Oskar, was openly a Freemason. It seems likely that Irene Scheffler was a Jew pretending to be a German for the purpose of this court case.
      I have no reasonable doubt that Katzenberger, Irene, judge Routhag and the other parties in this case were all complicit in a deception, and that the former was not executed.

Paul

I just found out the Lehman Katzenberger, the Jew convicted of illegal interracial sexual relations with the German woman Irene Scheffler in the hoax court case in Germany in 1942, was related to the Rothschilds. His son in law was 5x great great grandson of Meyer Moses Amschel Rothschild. Käthe Katzenberger, daughter of Lehman Katzenberger, was wife of Amos Bernhard Freimann. Amos Freimann was son of Betty Erlanger, through her, grandson of Eva Buttenweiser. Through her, great grandson of Fanny Meyer. Through her, 2x great grandson of Rabbi Abraham Joseph Meyer. Through him, 3x great grandson of Joseph Jonas Herz Solomon Schiff Meyer. Through him, 4x great grandson of Hannah Rothschild Meyer. Through her, 5x great grandson of Meyer Moses Amschel Rothschild. Meyer Moses Amschel Rothschild was the dad of Meyer Amschel Rothschild, who started the family's banking career. Given the extreme inbreeding of the elite Jewish families, it is very probable that Lehman Katzenberger was a close blood relative of the Rothschilds.

Paul Amschel Moses Meyer Rothschild relation to Lehman Katzenberger.jpeg

I just found out that Katzenberger had another marital relation to the Rothschilds. Hertz Naftali Rothschild (1596-1685) of Frankfurt am Main, Germany, was 7x paternal great granddad of the husband of the first cousin, once removed of Klara Sichel, wife of Katzenberger.

Hertz Naftali Rothschild was dad of Kalman Herz Rothschild, through him, granddad of Amschel Amsher Rothschild. Through him, great granddad of Kalonymous Ben Amschel Rothschild. Through him, 2x great granddad of Lob Yehuda Ben Kolonymous Rothschild. Through him, 3x great grandad of Kalman Loeb Rothschild. Through him, 4x great granddad of Herz Ben Kalman Rothschild. Through him, 5x great granddad of Loeb Lob Rothschild. Through him, 6x great granddad of Karl Kalmann Rothschild. Through him, 7x great grandad of Max Rothschild. Max Rothschild was the husband of Bella Sichel. Bella Sichel was the daughter of Leo Sichel. Leo Sichel was the son of Marcus Sichel. Marcus Sichel was the son of Abraham Sichel. Abraham Sichel was the dad of Leopold Sichel. Leopold Sichel was the dad of Klara Sichel. Klara Sichel was the wife of Katzenberger.

Amschel Moses Meyer Rothschild, the dad of the founder of the Rothschild banking clan, and 5x great granddad of the son in law of Katzenberger, was great grandson of Naftali Rothschild, the 7 x paternal great granddad of the husband of the first cousin, once removed of Klara Katzenberger. Amschel Moses Meyer Rothschild was son of Moses Kallamn Moshe Bauer de Rothschild, through him grandson of Kallman Hirsch Baumen Rothschild, through him great grandson of Naftali Rothschild.

From Katzenberger's multiple marital relations to the Rothschilds, we can infer that Katzenberger's family was one of the extremely inbred elite Jewish families and had a blood relation to the Rothschilds.

It is interesting to note that the judge in Kautzenberg's hoax trial was named Rothaug, a surname with obvious similarities to Rothschild.

Paul

Attachments-Another Rothschild marital relation to Katzenberger, Naftali Rothschild was 7x paternal great grandad of the husband of the first cousin, once removed of Klara Katzenberger.zip

Hello Rae, I just started reading a book by Angela Franks called Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy: The Control of Female Fertility. The author of the book is a feminist, and the thesis of her book is that Margaret Sanger was an obsessed eugenicist and that her promotion of birth control was mostly about her eugenic agenda. The aim of the author is to disprove claims that Sanger was not sincerely interested in eugenics, but was only pandering to eugenic elitists to gain their support.

But Franks evidences against her theory in the book. I wrote down one important evidence against her claim from her book, my comments are in brackets: The first issue of Sanger’s magazine declared the intention of its editor and chief writer: ‘To look the world in the face with a go-to-hell look in the eyes; to have an idea; to speak and act in defiance of convention.’ In the last issues, Sanger clearly supported the assassination of John D Rockefeller Jr, who, ironically, would become her greatest financial supporter about ten years later. [Making death threats on the elite is typically how controlled opposition behave, later switching to openly serving the elite is typical too. PB] A criminal charge of inciting assassination was brought against her, as well as charges of violating the federal Comstock laws, which forbade the mailing of indecent materials by post. She fled to England toward the end of 1914 under a false name. [Using multiple identities for the purpose of deception, as project/hoax actors often do. PB] Margaret Sanger’s Eugenic Legacy The Control of Female Fertility by Angela Franks McFarland and Company, Incorporated Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina and London 2005 Chapter One: Woman the New Race page 29

Margaret Sanger's links to the Rockefellers, and her having made death threats on them prior to her alliance with them, by themselves make her work very likely to be a psychological operation.

Wikipedia said in its article on Sanger:

'Sanger visited Japan six times, working with Japanese feminist Kato Shidzue to promote birth control. This was ironic, since ten years earlier Sanger had accused Kato of murder and praised an attempt to kill her.'

Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia Margaret Sanger: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

That bizarre behavior again, making death threats or supports attempted murder on a person, then working in alliance with the person. We see this behavior all the time with controlled opposition crypto-Jewish AntiJewish White nationalists. Patrick Little, one of them, stalked and threatened Andrew Anglin, another, I bet soon that they will be openly working together. This kind of behavior is also how cops infiltrating dissident political movements typically act. This behavior of Sanger's is very much in line with her work being fraudulent.

From wikipedia again:

'Margaret Sanger spent much of her 1914 exile in England, where contact with British neo-Malthusians such as Charles Vickery Drysdale helped refine her socioeconomic justifications for birth control. She shared their concern that over-population led to poverty, famine and war.[40] At the Fifth International Neo-Malthusian Conference in 1922, she was the first woman to chair a session. She organized the Sixth International Neo-Malthusian and Birth-Control Conference that took place in New York in 1925. Over-population would remain a concern of hers for the rest of her life.'

Her being involved with NeoMalthusian Conferences of the British elite is also highly suspicious. I believe that the real purpose of these conferences was to fabricate false evidence of a genocidal eugenic agenda, to give Jews a victim narrative to use against the Anglo-Saxon elite in future generations. The purpose would be to create a hoax victim narrative that would serve Jewish goals, however, Anglo-Saxons would not be the only scapegoats of this narrative. Certain Jews themselves would be, because this anti-eugenic narrative would also attack Jewish Zionism. Israel has been accused of practicing eugenics, in particular it has been accused of sterilizing Negro Jews from Ethiopia by putting contraceptives in drinking water. I believe that narrative to likely be a hoax to further Jewish Communist Anti-Zionism. Anti-Zionism is largely a Jewish movement and I believe its purpose is to make Israel out to be a White Ashkenazi Jewish racist colonial state, so as to link Israel to White supremacy and absolve non-Zionist Jews from complicity in it, and to use AntiZionism to further Russia's Operation Sig anti-Western strategy, by blaming America and Britain for the crimes of Israel. Israel was largely created through the influence of the Jewish British banking clan the Rothschilds, who formed an alliance with the Anglo-Saxon elite so that Jewish Zionists could gain a state in the region. So the purpose of hoaxing eugenics is partially to also vilify Israel.

From wikipedia again:

Sanger was born Margaret Louise Higgins in 1879 in Corning, New York, to Irish Catholic parents—a "free-thinking" stonemason father, Michael Hennessey Higgins, and Anne Purcell Higgins. Michael had immigrated to the United States aged 14, joining the Army in the Civil War as a drummer aged 15. Upon leaving the army, he studied medicine and phrenology but ultimately became a stonecutter, chiseling-out angels, saints, and tombstones. Michael became an atheist and an activist for women's suffrage and free public education.

Anne accompanied her family to Canada during the Great Famine. She married Michael in 1869. In 22 years, Anne Higgins conceived 18 times, birthing 11 alive before dying aged 49. Sanger was the sixth of 11 surviving children, spending her early years in a bustling household.'

Sanger being from an Irish Catholic family is interesting, even more interesting is that her mom is an alleged survivor of the Potato Famine. I believe that the narrative that the Potato Famine killed huge numbers of people is a Jewish hoax designed to vilify the Anglo-Saxon elite. I'm not saying that the British did not in any way oppress the Irish and I'm not saying that there was any justification for what the British did to the Irish, but I believe crypto-Jews in the elite were trying to divide and conquer their enemies by creating conflict between the Anglo-Saxons and the Irish. The antiBritish propaganda about the famine, such as that of Cecil Smith, accuses the British of planning genocide for Malthusian reasons. So Margaret being daughter of an alleged Potato Famine survivor and then joining Anglo-Saxon elites in promoting Malthusianism seems to me like intentionally hoaxing a narrative of Anglo-Saxon genocide.

It is also interesting that Margaret's dad served in the US Army in the Civil War. That is a bad sign too. Military veterans are frequently involved in espionage operations, including both projects and hoaxes. Mary Phagan's great granddad Daniel Thacker was a Confederate Army soldier in the Civil War and her family in general had a long history in the military, so did the other families in her case. Even Sanger's two first names, Margaret Louise, remind me of Mary, because Mary Phagan, according to mainstream newspaper accounts at the time, was named Mary Louise at birth after James Gantt's mom Mary Louise.

Margaret Sanger's Catholic background is also interesting. Perhaps she was not sincerely anti-Catholic, but was giving the cryptoJewish controlled Roman Catholic Church a false Holocaust narrative, that of birth control and abortion being a Holocaust. Jewish Zionist propagandist Hannah Newman uses that narrative and promotes it in her book The Rainbow Swastika: a Report to Jewry on New Age AntiSemitism. Here is an excerpt from that book discussing Sanger:

'A look at the history of "Planned Parenthood" (until 1942 called "The American Birth Control League") will reveal that its founders, Margaret Sanger, Madison Grant and Dr. Lothrop Stoddard, advocated a strong eugenicist worldview, proclaimed on the masthead of the Birth Control Review as "Creating a Race of Thoroughbreds". [Americans of that era were quite receptive to racial purity ideas, and the masthead did not create the furor it undoubtedly would today.] "For race betterment is such an intensely practical matter: when peoples come to realize that the quality of the population is the source of all their prosperity, progress, security and even existence; we shall see much-abused 'eugenics' actually moulding social programmes and political policies... we or the next generation..." (Stoddard, The Rising Tide of Color against White World Supremacy, 1930). Sanger advocated not only the "elimination of human weeds" in a social context, but approved of the "sterilization of genetically inferior races." (The Pivot of Civilization, p.101,108,123). Although she proposed a peaceful path to "racial purification," in which people would be educated and paid to foster "more children from the fit, fewer from the unfit", Sanger had no quarrel with the Nazis' compulsory sterilization program. Another BC League member, Harry Laughlin, received an honorary MD degree from the University of Heidelberg, in appreciation of his "contributions to the Third Reich". (Richard Hertz, Chance and Symbol, p.107). In return, a number of American eugenicists urged the Eugenics Record Office (a BC League enterprise) to make Adolf Hitler an honorary member. (see Robert Proctor, Racial Hygiene, p.103). Although this was not done, Nazi articles were printed and Nazi sterilization policies were praised in the Birth Control Review, even after American eugenicists were invited to witness their coercive and often brutal methods. [see more under Nazism section].' The Rainbow Swastika - Human History According to the New Age (iwarp.com)

Margaret Sanger was in a Rosicrucian fraternity. This is discussed in the book Margaret Sanger: A Life of Passion by Jean Baker on pages 103-104. The book also mentioned that Margaret held seances with a deceased relative. I do not have my copy of the book with me but here is a link to a google book preview which shows some of the quotes discussing this, though not the whole of the pages.

Margaret Sanger - Google Books

That behavior of Sanger's to me makes her likely to be a fraud. I remember that Frank's widow Lucille Selig talked to mediums shortly after her husband was allegedly lynched. I'm fairly certain that her husband's lynching was a hoax, so I bet that this means that Sanger hoaxed the death of her relative. Margaret Sanger wrote in her autobiography:

'The Woman Rebel produced extraordinary results, striking vibrations that brought contacts, messages, inquiries, pamphlets, books, even some money. I corresponded with the leading Feminists of Europe—Ellen Key, then at the height of her fame, Olive Schreiner, 112 Mrs. Pankhurst, Rosa Luxemburg, Adele Schreiber, Clara Zetkin, Roszika Schwimmer, Frau Maria Stritt. But I also heard from sources and groups I had hardly known existed—Theosophist, New Thought, Rosicrucian, Spiritualist, Mental Scientist. It was not alone from New York, but from the highways and byways of north, south, east, and west that inspiration came.'

The Project Gutenberg eBook of Margaret Sanger an Autobiography

What do you think of my points of suspicion against Sanger? Do you think that I have given good reason to be suspicious of her and to suspect that her eugenic project was actually a hoax designed for the purpose of inspiring a Jewish sponsored anti-eugenic movement? Paul

Oct 9, 2021

Hello Rae, Angela Frank wrote in Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy: 'Rose managed to alienate Sanger by pursuing an agenda that was less confrontational in its approach, which included changing the name of the BCFA to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) in 1942. Mary Lasker, who served on PPFA's executive committee as well as terms as secretary and vice president, claimed that her husband Albert, a wealthy advertising executive, came up with the new name.'
      That is very interesting because Albert Lasker was one of the wealthy Jews who financed Leo Frank's defense, and he seemed to be intentionally sabotaging the latter, for example in making comments bound to be recorded for posterity about Frank being a sexual pervert. So a person involved in a murder case where all of the mainstream narratives make no sense was involved in Margaret Sanger's group and in choosing its name, Planned Parenthood. That increases my suspicion that Sanger's eugenic project was a hoax. Paul

Oct 9, 2021

Hello Rae, I just read one more thing about Sanger that is very interesting, linking her, Rockefellers and Planned Parenthood to Nazi Germany:
      'Unfortunately for the Rockefellers' public image, one of the family foundations supported such unattractive groups as the German 'race hygiene' (i.e. eugenic) institutions. Indeed, the Rockefeller Foundation was a supporter of eugenic research in Germany in the crucial decade of the 1920s, supporting, among other projects, the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity. Among the eugenicists behind these projects were Emil Kraepelin, Eugn Fischer, Fritz Lenz and Ernst Rudin, and without these men and their institutions, the scientific developments and acceptance of Nazi eugenics would have been greatly impeded. Worse, the Rockefeller Foundation continued to support these eugenic projects in Germany even after the Nazis came to power. The family was not alone among American eugenicists in their blindness to the dangers of Nazism; Leon F Whitney of the American Eugenics Society, speaking of the Nazi sterilization law, said in 1934 that 'many far sighted men and women in both England and America have long been working earnestly toward something very like what Hitler has now made compulsory.'

Page 38 of Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy by Angela Franks This links eugenics to the Holocaust. Although I have not studied the Holocaust very much, I agree with what Ron Unz said about it in his article Holocaust Denial:
      Any conclusions I have drawn are obviously preliminary ones, and the weight others should attach to these must absolutely reflect my strictly amateur status. However, as an outsider exploring this contentious topic I think it far more likely than not that the standard Holocaust narrative is at least substantially false, and quite possibly, almost entirely so.
      American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz - The Unz Review

Even if the Holocaust is not entirely a hoax, it is at least substantially one. Sanger's eugenic project being linked to Nazi Germany and to the events surrounding the alleged Holocaust increases the probability that the latter is a hoax too. Paul

Oct 9, 2021

Hello Rae, Angela Frank described and quoted a very interesting letter in the book I am reading, Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy:
      The most questionable statement concerning race comes in a letter to Clarence Gamble. Her she is discussing the fledgling 'Negro Project,' an attempt by the Birth Control Federation of America to promote conctraceptive use among Southern Blacks, arguing that there is a need to recruit African American doctors and ministers to carry out the BCFA's plan.
      It seems to me from my experience where I have been in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee and Texas, that while the colored Negroes have great respect for White doctors they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts...The ministers work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want to word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

I do NOT believe that Sanger was planning to use birth control to eliminate or even reduce the numbers of African Americans. I believe that she was deliberately planting false evidence of a plan to do so, so as to hoax a eugenic birth control Holocaust of African Americans, to give them a hoax victim narrative. I consider this evidence for my view that eugenics is a hoax. I also am strongly inclined to suspect that things like the USA doing medical experiments on Black prisoners were also hoaxes. Paul

Oct 10, 2021

Hello Rae, Could I have a second page on your site to publish my research on Margaret Sanger and eugenics and the evidence that eugenics is a hoax?
      As I have said before, when I say eugenics is a hoax, the definition of the term 'eugenics,' is 'government mandated mass sterilizations of people'. Obviously eugenics in the sense of selective breeding to create desired phenotypes and avoid undesired phenotypes is real and happens. Even laws against incest are an expression of eugenics, since one of their main purposes is to prevent hereditary diseases. But I believe that eugenic mass sterilizations are either complete hoaxes or at least substantially false narratives.
      I am inclined to believe that the Holocaust is a hoax, and even if it is not a complete hoax, it is certainly at least a substantially false narrative. Jewish AntiWhite, AntiGerman and AntiChristian propagandists link eugenics to the Holocaust constantly, so I believe that there is a link between the hoaxing of the Holocaust and the hoaxing of eugenics. So this topic should be of interest to you and readers of your site. This topic really does not connect very much with the case of Frank and Mary Anne, although in some vague ways it does such as Albert Lasker being a financier of Frank's defense who apparently was deliberately sabotaging his client and also being a financier of Sanger's Planned Parenthood organization. So I believe it would be better suited to a different page. Paul

Oct 11, 2021

Hello Rae, The number of prostitutes Walter claimed that he had committed sexual acts against was 1,200, not 12,000. So it was one thousand, two hundred, in words. I originally read it as twelve thousand. But I still consider one thousand, two hundred, an unrealistic number. Paul

Hello, I was criticized for this statement:

'Jack Dorsey, the Chief Executive Officer of Twitter, is likely related to Hugh Dorsey, prosecuting attorney in the murder trial of Frank, and is 2x great grandson of John Henry Quinn and great grandson of Kathryn Quinn, the former the dad of, and the latter the sister of, Lemmie Quinn, defense witness of Frank, and Jack Dorsey is 2x great grandson of Eva Frank, which would likely make him related to Leo Frank, however distantly.'

Paul Bustion on ADL, Frank, and Mary Phagan. Was the Whole Thing a Jewish Fake? (big-lies.org)

It was misinterpreted by a reader as stating that Jack Dorsey was 2x great grandson of Hugh Dorsey. I do not believe Jack to be a direct descendant of Hugh.

I have plenty of much superior evidence for my point to the relations of these people to Jack Dorsey, so I would like that specific sentence deleted. Could you delete it? Paul

Thanks for emailing. I've copied them below and call the most recent 2, and the earlier 1. Can I make a general comment which I think were suggested by a Jew-naive friend Ivor Catt, whose main interest is electromagnetic theory. He thinks most scientists are mediocre and unoriginal, in fact parasitic in the way Jews are, drawing salaries and honors etc which are self-serving. True enough. I think the way Jews have operated can be seen from the spread of Christianity. I think there was a symbiosis, and in exchange for giving Jews protection and immunity from prosecution, the whole system of church lands and bishops and vicars was arranged so they got perpetual income and a job involving propaganda once a week for the church, the state, and the (jew-based) religion. So there were indeed many 'gentiles' (in England, I think 30,000 vicars plus their household staffs, plus bishops with their cathedrals and palaces etc). A big system, all based on nonsense in my view.

Similarly with other bureaucracies - education, science, military, media, etc. - which expanded as far as they can. So I think there were lots of 'gentiles' all parts of these fractions of whole economies, but they were finite in number.

You're on the right lines in looking at numbers and trying to estimate them. Most casual argument just mentions things (crimes are a good example; so are dangers in wars) but don't quantify them. On your email 1, you're looking at the holohoax and WW2, and also the Edom/ lost tribes idea.

I think the holohoax is a definite fraud, developed mostly after WW2, aimed to make money for Jews and distract from the whole thing. It's a non-issue compared with WW2 and it's only jewish media control that if was even possible.

WW2 is more complicated than the simple view it was group A vs group B. Because Jews were present on both sides too. And were a third side in the war. I don't think it was a hoax, but a lot of events can't be explained by the simple view, and hexzane seems to me good on them. I had hoped I met get some serious comments, but maybe military types are just too dim. I don't think much of the lost tribes stuff, and don't believe Europeans generally believe it. I don't think the idea existed before the 19th century, despite the huge propaganda impact of printed bibles in the 1600s (or so).
      On email 2, I think there are millions of collaborators with jews, but that doesn't mean they think they are jews. The churches illustrate the types, where there were lots of vicars, their families, their communities forced to go on Sundays etc, and all based on Jewish stuff. More or less analogous to people who gawp at stuff about black holes or higgs bosons etc and who indirectly fund things like CERN.
      So I think more detail disposes of this material. But I may be wrong, since there's a lot going on!
      I do have doubts about Hexzane, notably because he's said nothing about Ukraine, which surely he could do.

Rae

Hi PB! I've been trying to get CJB to talk, with Chris Caskie, but so far have failed, though I dont know why.

. I don't think you've quite got the point of WW2. Jews won it collectively. It's not that anyone else won or lost. That's the question.

It's the way Jews juggled things. I'm not sure it was even clever: if you see it as a collection of people following algorithms, Jews with secrecy and US money and bribes and appointments of 'leaders' etc arranged things. Hitler was an appointee like FDR and Churchill and Stalin and others - in Japan, China, Italy and no doubt India and Argentina. Palestine no doubt was part of the package .

That's what I think, put succinctly.— Rae

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

Could be an important note:-   I think babies go through a long period, say aged 0-2, when they find they can control their movements, including muscles and limbs and feeding and excretion and activities involving nerves, such as reacting to pain, learning to crawl, learning to walk, learning to control speech. That's with normal development.
      But after all that they find they can't extend control more: they can't fly, they can't move to another place without effort, they can't dress without effort, thy can't understand language without effort. I think the 'terrible twos' are the stage when they discover limits. And it they can't understand why these limits exist—which is too difficult for most—they may have a lifelong desire for fantasies. Belief in god(s), belief in the power of words alone, such as in prayer, belief in invisible worlds, belief in 'speaking in tongues', egocentric assumptions that illness have a human cause—I suspect all come from this source.
—RW

wrote:

Hi, Paul.

I wouldn't be too impressed by that. 'Undistinguished two storey house' is nonsense; look up 20 Maresfield Gardens NW3 on Google Maps. It's big place in Hampstead. The write-up is typical Jewish stuff; 'driven out of Germany' ... 'great scientist' etc of the charlatan. She was obviously few money and given a building, with fellow Jews.

.

It seems to be true that WW2 was organised behind the scenes by Jews, who of course are distributed world-wide: USA paper money, London finance, Moscow and Soviet empire, etc. Britain was spared much bombing, but Germany was not. France was reputedly bombed more than any country except Germany. As with propaganda, various areas were treated separately. Similar with eg Vietnam or Afghanistan; none of the US operations were reported in the USA.

[I think Anna Freud was just using the war as an opportunity.]

My site has a piece 'how the master race won ww2' on this topic. Hexzane57 (from France, probably) has a number of separate papers on WW2 and its oddities, which lead hexzane527 to the view that Hitler was a figurehead installed by Jews. Miles Mathis has a few similar things.

Rae