2024 General Election in the UK

So far:
For many years, the UK has had two 'major' parties, 'Labour' and 'Conservative'. Both are predominantly funded by Jews, who take advantage of their ability to print money through the 'Central Bank' system. And the 'first past the post' system keeps minor parties out.  (This is similar to the USA, except they have complications caused by having 50 or so states).

The 'Labour' Party was started in 1900 (near enough). At the time there were only 'Conservative' and 'Liberal' parties. There was some agitation for republicanism, free of aristocrats and religions, plus industrialism to cheapen things, including information. I think it's fair to say the outcome was an anxiety to control labour, of all types, however varied. Jews have a tradition of inventing controls at a new high level, and modern types of huge 'unions' subtly came into existence. All the 'Labour' leaders were 'educated' in Oxbridge colleges; there were all but zero working class leaders. A useful result for Jews was that unions could be controlled, so that they would be made to support wars.
      There are faint survivors of republicanism, such as William Cobbett, and earlier so-called peasant leaders.
      A serious defect of the 'Labour Party' is its marooned isolation, its lack of intellectual motivation. Overhearing two men arguing, one said something like "the working class are still put down." The other said: "The working class are nothing without the middle classes. Nothing." Angela Rayner, the suppose deputy head of Labour, seems even worse than Starmer, thinking that big unions of nurses and trolley-pushers will be helpful in opposing new health risks. Perhaps she thinks it's "the dictatorship of the Proletariat"..
      'Labour' has its worst aspect in its sucking up to Jews, which has been with it from its start. It has always gone with Jewish control of Russia, now a dangerous threat to people everywhere. Lenin is credited with the phrase "useful idiots" for people who vote for crypto-Jews without understanding Jews. Lenin—now dead more than 100 years—casts his syphilitic influence, still being unravelled, over Stalin. Starmer is said to have looked for 'terrorists'. In fact of course he did nothing to investigate 9/11, or other huge Jew frauds. He did nothing about Jewish information control. He looked into whites, part of the Jewish anti-white movement. A vote or him is a vote for 'useful idiocy'; but it's not so simple, as parties are all heavily-controlled and others may be worse or operating together. The shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves is another Jew who did P.P.E.

The Conservatives were (I think) more complicated; mostly as a result of Cromwell's use of Dutch Jews to introduce the new system of debt into the City of London. I'd guess most people in the so-called Civil Wars had no idea what was happening. The 18th century following was marked by poverty for most and florid expensive houses for the few. All this is more-or-less secret, concealed by an imbecilic monarchy, now headed by Charles, with something like zero accomplishments, and by subservient groups such as the Church of England—now heading for oblivion—and later organisations like the National Trust.
      There may well be survivors of early conservatives, though it seems unlikely. 'Recusants' handicap themselves by not understanding the Jewish rot at the base of Christianity and Islam. But possibly they understand that intellect and work and effort underpin progress—something that Jewish fanatics seem unable to understand, and which may prove fatal in the long run.
      At present some research goes into changes—preferably improvements—into everything from plastics production and IT hardware to building design and motor vehicles. But this is counteracted by huge frauds, such as NASA and nuclear 'science' and profitable medical frauds of the 'AIDS', 'COVID', 'Pandemic', fluoride, and low-salt types, and vast wastes of 'educational' rubbish. Most of these things are backed by 'Conservatives'.
      I'd thought Sunak may be Indian, but it seems Paki is closer, so Bengal/ East India/ opium may be involved and certainly censored. Sunak has an unendearing habit of praising Britain for allowing him to become rich, with no accompanying detail. He was obviously 'groomed' for the post. (His alleged early connections with a pharmacy are revealed to be insignificant by his ignorance over 'COVID').

The result so far is what is called 'democracy' which of course is marked by very tightly controlled information. It could probably never have come into being without it. The control system is fascinating in itself, relying on secrecy of official documents, and on ownership of companies which permits owners to force opinions on media workers, writers, news sources, advertisers, and lower grade civil service and Jew-influenced sources such as Christians and Islam and military propagandists and simple Monarchists. But at least there seems some chance that Conservatives may have insight into such things.
      [ An example: ‘The Great War [1914-1919 or other dates] brought thousands upon thousands of educated men (who took up public duties as temporary officials) up against the staggering secret they had never suspected — the complete control exercised over things absolutely necessary to the nation's survival by half a dozen Jews, who were completely indifferent as to whether we or the enemy should emerge alive from the struggle.’ Hilaire Belloc on the sudden surprise when hidden secrets run wild. ]
      There are many reports of election fraud and rigged elections which if course fit in with Jewish attitudes.
      Both these parties seem to have adopted losing strategies: Starmer will put up taxes (at least as fact-checked by some outfit). And Sunak was a compulsory 'National Service' for what is not now a nation, with such opportunities as joining the RNLI and help illegal immigrants invade Britain, or (if accepted) join the Army and risk being killed for Jews. Or providing non-medical help for old people—a growing sector.

If I'm right, if MPs lose their seats they are out—including party leaders. I'm tempted to suggest voters in Starmer's seat all vote Conservative, and voters in Sunak's seat vote Labour, and ditto for deputies.

The Reform Party has very many candidates (I haven't counted) across Britain. But many must be paper candidates only. It is the only party that mentions immigration and illegal immigration, and the huge pressures on infrastructure, housing, crime, overpopulation, health, education. This has existed at least since Barbara Roche—fat Jews—opened the gates.
      But they seem to have the usual policy no keep quiet about Jews—who have deliberately controlled propaganda and worked for unlimited immigration. So they may only represent a split amongst Jews. But it could be significant. Their website is a bit disappointing: Farage is in online videos at the EU, speaking of Soros funding illegal immigrants into Europe, but there's nothing of this on His website.
      Richard Tice left the Conservatives in 2019 to join the Brexit Party; he's been a property developer.

Sex and Media Imagery: Casual observers of the oddities of 'news' presenters may need a 'heads up' here. The masses of money poured into the media, and the lack of qualifications, make it seem attractive as a career; hence empty subjects such as 'media studies' which never quite get to any serious point. Here's a anecdote from the late Dr Harold Hillman, who was for a time part of Amnesty International. He told me a BBC man turned up at a meeting, and an 'erotic shiver' went around the 'activists'. After the chap had slept with 'all the most attractive' of the women, he went away and wasn't contactable. The BBC, much like media around the world, had this effect on many. But it has its own rules, and being Jewish is a priority—and they don't advertise it. Every time I see some woman trying to read out some anonymous author, or AI construction, I'm inclined to wonder if there was a casting couch issue. Probably for non-whites, the freakishly closeted Jewish homosexuals get their treat. Don't expect any more wisdom than from presenters of shopping channels.

For Beginners to Jewish Research.  Important!

• NOTE FOR TEENAGERS:   In one respect, you are lucky—one of the luckiest set of people in thousands of years. For the first time ever, you may be able to study the Jewish question, reading or listening to honest people. Not religious frauds, not political liars, not inferior teachers picked for being useless, not the money-minded, not people forced to lie about their ancestors. Internet has made this possible. Old people may only have learned of this three-quarters through their lives, if at all. You have the chance of finding out for yourselves. But be very careful. Say it's Bible Study or ancient wisdom or anthropology or psychology or mind expansion or alternative studies or something. You may be spied upon and harmed. So keep it careful, and be wary. If you don't do something, you'll just be another sheep who will never understand the real world and how secrecy is used.
• IF THIS ENTIRE TOPIC IS NEW to you—which is likely—here are subtle clues to so-called Jews:   Surnames may be traditional Jewish names, such as Cohen/Kuhn and Levi/Levin and Stein/Stone. Or names from Russia, Germany, Poland: Adler, Kissinger, Schwab, Soros. Or names changed from foreign names to resemble British or American names; Welsh or Scottish are often found: Attenborough, Dimbleby, Galloway, Sinclair, Newman, Rose. You may be able to trace such things with websites on genealogy.
  
  
  "Pierre Trudeau"
        First Names, not 'Christian' names, may have a Biblical or Talmudic feel. Some names give a clue to where they once lived: so-called Marranos came from Spain and Portugal centuries ago. Central Asia and China and previous part of Russia remain fairly obscure here. Jewish superstitions were introduced into Christianity and Islam, and other religions, such as Quakers and Jesuits.
        Jews call everyone else 'goys' or 'goyim', though of course they have serious discrimination, against blacks for example. where full-term 'abortions' of blacks are encouraged, as in New York. At present there is a lot of anti-white Jewish activity—watch for it, understand it, fight it.
        Jews feel it 'sacred' to lie to non-Jews ('goys'). They feel they own everything not in their hands, and have elaborate rules, the 'Kahal system' on trying to do this. Generally, they tend to steal from the vulnerable, then ingratiate with other 'elites'. Think of Jews having made fortunes from opium offering dowries to poor aristocrats. Another example is early Christianity with beheadings and bloodshed, later censored, in exchange for 10%. Huge frauds are characteristic of Jewish movements.
        Jewish 'sacred books' Are very little known. How many people have heard of the Talmud? When they are concerned with taboos ad ritual and money for priests, they contain flaming hatred for all non-Jews. Fascinatingly, they are trying at present to make up 'hate crime legislation' while trying to make it not applicable to themselves. Legal systems have been so corrupted by Jews hat they may succeed.
        Jews have a genetically-absurd view that they have descent through mothers. Anyway, because of that belief, they often go to great length to hide motherhood connections. Wikipedia, the Jewish encyclopedia, has endless examples where information on mothers and grandmothers is secret. Intense inbreeding often leads to genetic defects—so-called 'Jewish diseases' which doctors started to notice around 1900. They noticed 'Muslim diseases' later.
• 
  

  Parasitic Evolution of Jews is quite a long detailed article on the evolution of so-called Jews in the last few thousand years. It includes the Mediterranean, evolution of secrecy characteristics, the invention of reading and writing, the invention of money economies, and the invention of controlled religions.
        It's (of course!) unusual to include such things in election campaigns where it's usual to aim for short-terms results only.
        But some people (and I think often it's older people, with experience of life, who find themselves able to see through the lifelong lies) may find the information life-changing.
• Invented Religions: Many old people are aghast at the idea that Jews invented religions, notable Christianity and Islam. Even though it's obvious. The way this worked was that Jews were given so sort of immunity, in exchange for light jobs and money for life—'Lords Spiritual' being a joke title. Islam was something similar, aimed at Arabs.
• Race mixing and movements seem to be historically rooted in the middle east junction of several obviously different races, plus Mediterranean ship development and slavery. I'd guess many people have herd the idea that Atlantic slavery was a Jewish trade using Jewish ships.
        Jews use races as biological weapons: if you see the grinning liar Fiona Bruce on the BBC with carefully-picked audiences, including mixed race people with no idea they were produced by Jewish experiments, imagine the selection processes by which advertising agencies and TV programme-makers and 'academics' pick unqualified and useless people. (Bruce has a degree in French and Italian—supremely useless, but for a presenter with her earpiece and intellectual nullity.) It's what Jews do.
• On militarism it's possible slow learning processes come into play. During the Great War, many men joined up, offered food and pay. When their friends stopped returning, enthusiasm faded, so they were forced to go by conscription. That war, as far as most people knew, came out of the blue. 20 years later many people expected war. Americans proved to be amazingly liable to propaganda, but today some of them have learned about Jews and careful lying. Both main areas in Asia were subjected to huge wars, but I doubt whether this could be done now, as both Russians and Chinese have been devastated. The are people fearing the power of Jews in Russia and in China, bit it's difficult even to guess how credible these fears are. All I'm saying is that propaganda may fade with time.
• Here's one example of Jewish lies muddying the water. After about 1945, many Jews wanted to get into New York, having obstructed Europeans. \So they formed the UNRRA, nominally for the relief of refugees. There were plenty of refugees, for example millions in the new regions India and Pakistan. But they weren't Jews, and weren't included. Later 'Human Rights' were used by Jews in their Kalergi scheme, to flood Europe with aliens. Millions of them—80 million in the 'Barcelona Accord'. Some Jews now oppose this, without saying why, which is why the 'Human Rights' legislation in Europe, supported by Jews like Merkel, and their puppets, is 'not fit for purpose'. A Labour Party spokesman however thinks 'Human Rights' legislation should stand forever, or Britain will be a 'pariah'—a typical Jewish argument.
        Another example of Jewish distraction is the general wording of their policies. Consider 'death duties', where the suggestion is that when you die, you have a duty to pay up. Jew financiers, lending money, feel no obligation to pay, just to keep interest repayments for ever. Only recently was the Second World War paid for.
        Many absurd ideas (such as LGBTQ, several genders) are promoted by Jews, probably to be malignant and harmful. A useful tip can be to ask such people "Who pays you?" and insist on an answer.
• There's a carefully-cultivated belief that Jews have high IQs. When surveying Jewish history, it's useful to consider the opposite hypothesis, that they are by and large stupid. The high-IQ legend seems to be a product of many people's tendency to defer to supposed superiors: if they're told X is qualified, they tend to believe it. For this reason, Jews do what they can with fake honours and degrees. A similar principle to blacks wearing fancy uniforms, and Filipinos buying fake medical qualifications.
        'IQ' in fact is extraordinarily difficult to measure, having a large number of possible mistakes and errors. After 1945 it had a vogue, which is fast disappearing. Here's my very saddening piece on the dying organisation Mensa.

• Astounding media control - though it's impossible to review the tidal waves of Jewish sewage, I've done a little bit—reviews of Portillo's Jewish accounts on rail journeys, comments on Fellowes' Downton Abbey, looks at Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter, obvious propaganda films like Schindler's List, Denial, Oppenheimer, such things as Penguin books. There's an extra problem from formal 'arts' education—there are no official critics able to deal with blatant dishonesty. Imagine Sam Johnson or Petronius trying to deal with anonymous BBC Jews. Typically fightback is feeble—most people don't go into bookshops, for example, finding them odd and alien in ways they can't formulate.
• Examples like Whittle of suppressed intelligent people
• Immense risks of Jewish fanaticism and stupidity. Who can predict the long-term effects in (say) ten generations?
• Russia. Just one example of the fantastically lightweight information from modern 'historians', who are mostly unfit for purpose. Let's start with Stalin, 'Man of Steel', the nickname used to hide his Jewish roots. 'longest serving leader' (read: murderous dictator) 1924-1953, when the GULag slave labour camps flourished; details are still secret. European and American corporations worked with Stalin with Jewish money. Stalin's rule straddled the 'Great Patriotic War', which now seems most likely to have been arranged by world-wide Jewry, including in America and in Germany. The Holocaust: Made in the USSR shows the atrocities falsely attributed to Germans were just performed or made up in the 'Soviet Union'. The U.N. was invented by Jews after the war, and rigged so that a new state, Israel, only needed a 2/3 majority vote.
        Note the censorship that always accompanies Jewish victories; a good example is the victory of Jewish Christianity, accompanied and followed by slaughters and mass cultural destruction, possibly to remove reminders of Jewish lack of creativity.
        That's just one segment of Jewish destruction. But the entire history of Russia is obscure; including the formation of countries, the penetration of Christianity and its funding, slavery, the removal of the Romanovs, the use of Hebrew in the Russian Empire, and about 1900 the assassinations of politicians trying for reform. There are occasional leaks: at present it's suggested that some clique of Jews dominates. None of this is mentioned by the 'Labour Party', despite their intimate involvement.

‘Traitorous Labour Lawyer/Politician Sir Keir Starmer and his Jewish wife’   Other online photos of Starmer show fanatical stolid hostile expressions.
    This is from the Occidental Observer which allows some European contributions. It has similar piece on 'Lord' Hattersley, who made it very clear he ignored his constituent's wishes, and his Jewish wife.

    Note that there are no media events showing Jews being taught that goys are worthless, shiksas are whores; so-called Jews invented God and are chosen by themselves—all the trash of centuries. The repellent woman is cushioned by complete censorship, including in fiction
Image from Spinwatch. The image has gone. Diagram of rich Jewish organizations that control British politics. Diagram from The Occidental Observer

4 June 2024   BBC   Starmer vs Sunak:– Choose your Prime Minister to 'King Charles III'.

I call it 'staged' partly because of the passively obedient chosen audience, but mainly because the two sides have so many weaknesses. They must have met to decide which items were too embarrassing to mention. And they must have decided how to spin the points on which they agree to lie to audiences. How much of the whole thing is a charade, in the way TV 'soaps' are planned in advance, and then videoed, I don't know.

Since we're in the world of Jew-controlled information, let's use the correct technical vocabulary. Official Jewish 'ethics' (always called that by subservients) says that non-Jew girls are whores, or 'shiksas'. So I'll refer to Etchingham, the nominal conductress of the show, as the 'Whore'. I don't have good nicknames for the puppet protagonists. Maybe 'hangdogs' will do. Perhaps candidates for Bilderberg are given nicknames when they perform.

Let me mention a few topics suppressed from the 'debate'.
      “The Lockdown” is one on which both Starmer and Sunak profess to agree, despite knowing nothing about medical research. AIDS and COVID are similar medical issues. (There are reliable claims that smallpox was spread by blankets given to some 'natives'. I wonder if they were claimed to be 'vaccines'?) So is cancer—a studio person complained abut the NHS, but not about research into cancer being wrecked deliberately. Nothing on addiction and 'OxyContin' and the Jewish Sacklers. And nothing that I saw on the obesity epidemic, slowly wreaking havoc as junk food dominates.
      Another suppressed topic is the defects inbred into Jews and Moslems, probably resulting in deaths in Pakistan, but not here. They expect lifelong care here; in fact the NHS has guidelines specifically on treatments for any problems, however exotic and irrevelant to this country's people.
      Re Gaza, both 'debaters' agree on the importance of 'defence against HAMAS', not mentioning (this is Miles Mathis) that HAMAS's legal advisor is a New York Jew.
      It fascinated me to see Sunak defending paying for 'our nuclear deterrent' without any idea the whole thing has been exploded (pun intended).
      Starmer claimed he'd pursued terrorists, at any rate through the courts. So of course he's been busy with 9/11 hasn't he? And smaller things, such as the fake Manchester bombing. The sort of faked events Jews love to put in the record.
      Starmer was in Crown Prosecutions. About the time the events 'documented' in Mr Bates vs the Post Office —"one of the 'worst miscarriages of justice in British history'" —Yes i was really called that.
      Sunak and 'lifeboat charity' RNLI used volunteers to ferry invaders across the channel. No doubt funded by Jews.
      Both agree to do nothing about attacks on white girls. Nothing on Ghislaine Maxwell, James Savile OBE.
      The Whore automatically confined the discussion on immigration to rubber boats on the open south coast. Nothing on the millions who have flooded in and get preferential treatment. The population has ballooned and young whites find it difficult to get on 'housing ladder' and get work
      Just some of many things. A side-issue is the present-day complete irrelevance of the Church of England, even with Welby, their Jewish 'leader'. Modern media techniques easily outrun vicars turning out once a week with their silly half-educated stories

Another submerged issue is the condition of such things as the BBC and Civil Service. The BBC was formed as a Jewish radio broadcaster in about 1920 by Rufus Isaacs, later renamed for secrecy 'Lord Reading'. By constant repetition this expensive junk organisation has something of a fake reputation as honest. An incredible achievement. Something similar is true of the 'Civil Service' and its reputation for neutrality, when in fact it has internal promotion routes which are entirely undemocratic and dependent on Oxbridge Jewry. Sunak made a claim about a £2000 tax on all families, claiming it was a forecast by the Civil Service. There is now so much science and social fraud that the Civil Service is immersed in it.

- Raeto West   6 June 2024

BBC Friday 7 June   19:30 - 21.00 7 political parties 'election debate'

The BBC has vast experience in lying; so I wasn't expecting anything new or serious. Anyway, the conductor is supposed to be someone called Mishal Husain, who I'll call 'the Whore' in recognition of her media trade. There were no serious details of the audience, who presumably were the usual collection of pressure-group members, primed to give canned applause. It occurs to me to wonder who was paid.

Many people doubt the capacity of females to carry political ideas. And these women did nothing to dispel such fears. Penny Mordaunt and Angela Rayner represented the Jewish parties. Rayner amused me by being unable to pronounce "nuclear", and for my taste was very weak, just the right companion for Starmer's bleak fanatical ignorances and inability to visualise anything beyond control.
      Carla Danyer (some of these names may be misspelt) in green, with an invasive voice, says the biggest threat is climate change. That's her barker's role, left over from many years' bullshit. It's what she's paid to say. Then a Lib Dem woman, a pseudo-party founded years ago and not the least 'democratic', an ideology forged by Jews and never intended seriously, like nationalism and socialism and Christianity and Islam and revolutions and patriotism.
      Two of the males, for the SNP and Plaid Cymru, seemed almost totally idea-less, supporting unending immigrations for eternity despite having tiny nations of (I believe) 4 million.
      The only informed person there was Farage, now of the Reform Party. But we've seen him before.

I'll just add that there was a complete moratorium on Jews—their connection with the Federal Reserve, the Holocaust fraud, the rabbinical hate, the complete secrecy on Synagogues and Freemasons—all going without a single mention. Surprise, eh. There was nothing on giving votes to imported aliens without the remotest right to votes in Britain.

Farage mentioned drugs, though not that Jews encourage drugs with 'needle exchanges' and supplies from Afghanistan other things. I think Farage emerged best, or least bad, but he's been around for years with no discernible policy. He may just be controlled opposition.

12 June 2024 ITV. 'Interview' with Rishi Sunak.

In fact, the video had a lot of talking heads generally in the same style of giving little away, like 'infomercials' for chains of shops.

Brand is described as 'Welsh'. In this review, I'll take it that he's either a Jew or strongly linked to Jews, since this is the usual pattern. It's not yet illegal to conceal Jewish connections, at least not in public.

The talk part allegedly was filmed after a routine piece on D-Day, 1944, which at last is being inspected by critical minds. Sunak seems to have faced interminable delays; how intentional this was, Brand didn't ask. We had the usual stuff on 'Sacrifices for our freedoms' which have been part of the Jewish World War 2 narrative—so far.
      Sunak seemed relaxed and amiable and without serious concerns.

[On India I wrote a background piece, since its history (including Bengal and so on) is all but unknown. Note that Amyarta Sen and Imran Khan both have Rothschild wives. I'm suggesting some such connection applies to Sunak.]

Briefly, born 1980 in Southampton, Sunak went to Winchester and I assume Oxford to 'do' PPE. PPE from about 1920. (Imagine more than a century since 1920 of tutorials and lectures and seminars on carefully Jew-picked topics, avoiding truths, so Oxford could get its money).
      I'm guessing here that Sunak was spotted and groomed, as Obama (or whatever his real name) was for the US President token position. Just as Thatcher was spotted by her north London Jews. Thatcher was the first woman PM; Sunak the first non-white. In the Jewish world, this is 'progressive'—anything Jews want: war, pornography, child sex, drugs, poverty of whites—is 'progressive'. Sunak's wealth is of course regarded by Brand as 'success', without any comment on its roots, the standard Jewish view. Brand asks no questions on Jewish money connections. Or for that matter how state funding has long been handled by weird fanatics.

By October 2022, Sunak was voted Party Leader and/or Prime Minister. This is fewer than two years ago. There must be some serious conservatives who lasted through Jewish incursions. Whether they have politicians they trust I simply don't know. I'd guess people like Grosvenor are entirely embedded in Judaism, but possibly there are some survivors from the 20th century. So it seems possible that genuine Conservatism may exist, though genuine grass roots republicanism which Benn toyed with seems unlikely to have survived: Labour is more or less saturated with Lenin and Jewish junk, and lack of the intelligence which early republicans hoped for.
      All the above suggests that Sunak was groomed to make the Conservatives fail, since there's clearly a strong move to push 'Labour' despite their obvious uselessness.

The sad repetitive banality of Brand, no doubt under instruction for the Jewish owners, continued. More on 'COVID' and 'the pandemic'. More on the EU and brexit, at zero level. The 'energy crisis'. English schools and educational reforms with of course nothing on fanatical Jewish hate. Strkes, but nothing on agitators and the more absurd claims. (Angela Rayner is laughable on that, taking her viewpoint of shopfloor and subsidiary people, not the best way to arrange and organise and improve such things as cancer research, genetic problems caused by inbreeding in 'Jews' and Muslims, and diabetes and diseases imported by aliens ).

Brand, in traditional Jewish mode, naturally divides non-Jews into two camps; which can then be placed into enmity: Sunak was "wrong... he was outflanked on the right." Simple Jews don't bother with anything outside their genetically-learned hate.

Sunak says Immigration is too high. It puts pressure on public services. Poor Brand knows his bosses expect more money from rents, hotels, and higher house prices. So, crap employee that he is, he says nothing.

It amused me to see Brand trying to pull himself up to say "The Labour Party says you're a LIAR." When of course all Jews are told from the cradle that lying is the correct policy with goyim.

Anyway, more on if he fails to get elected, it's his big failure. I doubt Sunak cares, insulated by Jewish money which would amount to more than he could possibly make from his Prime Minister's salary.
      In fact it's possible Sunak was, all along, set up to fail. Jews seem to have decided it's time for 'Labour' in Britain. And are going for it. Plenty of polls, genuine or fake, are claimed to point that way. If he does win, I hope there'll be serious selection of a new leader (or leaders). The Conservative constitution is obscure and gives a lot of scope.

- RW   13 6 2024

14 June 2024 BBC. Half an hour. Nick Robinson BBC 'political editor'. With Keir Starmer.

Unusually, Nick Robinson (b. 1963), who has been in BBC news for (I think he said; I haven't tried to check) 14 years, is quoted by Wikipedia as having a 'German Jewish mother'. He did PPE at Oxford. Just another media hack. His ordinariness and unoriginality is comedic, as indeed is his entire presentation. He is now greyer and balder, a small figure who never strays from his guidelines.

Starmer, alleged author of the newest Labour Manifesto, and also author of a statement on becoming 'Labour' leader, was keen to remind people of Labour's losses following Blair—2010, 2015, [D Miliband; Jew who seems to have gone to the USA to encourage immigration], 2017 Jeremy Corbyn (my sketch of yet another Jew), and 2019. Starmer listed 5; something wrong here.

Anyway, Robinson, as in all his other 'interviews' for years, dodged or was too stupid to think of, all serious issues.
      Like all these hacks, they think education is class sizes and buildings. They don't comment on the obvious failures, with millions of pupils having no idea about the world. Of course they don't; it's what's wanted.
      There was no mention of the stranglehold of Jews on Britain, and indeed the world. This is hugely important and in a sense it's remarkable that, with massively crap media and education, Starmer and crypto-Jews haven't won despite maintaining pretty complete secrecy. This has become more difficult with Internet, though neither of the clowns mentioned Internet.
      Starmer though that, if there was a crisis, he would nobly shoulder the burden—stern work, but his duty, especially if the victims were goyim; he has no idea about science and nuclear frauds from which vast sums could be saved. Possibly Robinson has advance notice of Jew war plans; maybe the election was called with that in mind. Nothing was said on Gaza.
      Neither of these clowns said anything about the Jewish stink glands deposited on official history. This of course goes back millennia. Possibly the most important Jew-related issue is the Roth-schild grasp on money supply.
      Nothing was said on the impossibility of good health care while populations were encouraged to boom. Nothing was said on the plight of young Britons kept out of mortgages and deliberately mal-educated.

If you got the impression that Robinson let off Starmer easily, you're right. If you felt it was mutual, crudely assembled to seem confrontational, you're right.

- RW   14 6 2024

18 June 2024   Channel 4. 'Immigration Debate'   (18.30 - 19:50 with ad break).

Deputies etc of 7 parties referred to as 'the panel'.
All politicians (or paper politicians); no experts.
'Talent' (media expression for the puppet supposedly in control, plus many hidden controllers) Krishna Guru-Murthy (the irritant of Robert Downey)

The format was a smallish group of seated people, with pre-checked questions read from the floor by the usual sheepish types.
      The questions (of course) were always leading: the first I think was "Do you approve of early release of prisoners to ease prison overcrowding?" There was the usual media Jewish word salad: Neighbourhood policing? Victim-based crime? Anti-social behaviour? Hot-spot patrols? plus more-or-less doctored statistics, such as 44% of voters sampled don't trust either main party—unsurprisingly. Probably the figure was massaged below 50%, though the police weren't given that favour. I think there were two police officers in the questioners, though they fell short of revealing why they wanted to leave.
      There was some mention of rapes and special 'rape courts', though of course nothing on race rapes, or false claims, or the difficulties of proof, or solicitors making money.

The 'Immigration Debate' then started. The 3 main players were the Conservative (acting in Jewish interests, and against Britain's; if they wanted his money), and a short 'Labour' chap. This latter was very keen on the 1951 Refugee Convention, a 'UN Multilateral Treaty' passed when the UN was fairly new, set up by a coalition of post-war Jews, including input from Stalin. The 'Labour' chappie thought Britain would become a 'pariah [an Indian dog] and would have far less influence on the world.'
      More interesting than the spluttering male whores was Richard Tice, who is or was Chairman of Reform UK, talking of a 6 million population rise over the Tory duration, and the cake being divided by an extra 3/4 of a million people per year, leading to the longest-ever long-term recession in British history. There isn't a people shortage; work doesn't pay.

Incidentally a chap in the audience said he was in the 'hospitality sector' and wanted immigrants—the Scottish party said the same. Hotels in Britain have been in decline for years, probably as a result of cheap flights to warmer regions, not difficult to foresee. I'd guess he wanted sympathy for putting up illegal immigrants in his hotels as a money-making scheme.

Another sneaked-in person was from the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, possibly more accurately a Jewish group for obstructing British law.

Yet another was a 'refugee from Afghanistan' who said nothing about the Jewish-led war, but said he paid tax. Whether he paid for Britain's infrastructure and benefits was left unclear.

An oddity was an account of someone who wanted to work in the NHS, but wasn't qualified. Perhaps the female responded will have th privilege some time of being operated on by an unqualified 'surgeon'. It would seem to be fitting.

Anyway, there was more (including the Rwanda Scheme) but all inconclusive, an aviary of parrots. In case you're interested, there was no discussion of long-term Jewish plans to flood white counties with non-whites.

© Raeto West   19 June 2024