India

India, when it was a single country, had a long history of association with Europe. Especially with Britain. This article looks at that history, which is perhaps rather shamefully neglected.

The Manchester Guardian has been a Jewish newspaper organ since Jews controlled Manchester's cotton mills. Marx and Engels are well-known as Jews whose role was to ruin white moves to control the finances and/or property in Britain. It has to be admitted that they were very successful, converting socialism from a serious movement of reform into world-wide secret Jewish control, along with Freemasonry. And converting 'democracy' from an idealistic movement into a closely-confined trammelled structure.
'World-wide' includes China and, to some extent, India. I'll try to explore this latter aspect of our world.

Note the very important fact that, if you don't understand the role of Jews, important parts of India's history will be hidden from you. This is why many popular histories—of the sort published by Jewish corporations—are nearly worthless..
Another very important fact is that Jews often rely on other subgroups to work their schemes. An important example is the invention of Christianity, which had a huge network of parishes and vicars, offering lifetime income, though not usually property, in exchange mostly for rubbish. To this day many people in Britain have an affection or this system, without tracing it to its roots.

The conclusion I've come to is that Jews are using their invention and control over Islam as a power exploration against India, perhaps as part of a move to 'Greater Israel' as suggested by hexzane527 from France. Hexzane527 makes many speculations, but this article on WW3 seems probable if things continue.

Amartya Sen (born 1933), who looks for my taste rather like H J Eysenck, who was probably a Jew from Germany, recently featured in the Guardian as a world-beating thinker and intellectual, of world stature as an economist, social speculator, essayist, Nobel 'laureate', and (perhaps hesitantly) speaker. This makes him sound like Chomsky, now of course widely regarded as a phoney. Sen appears to be married to a Rothschild, and to have had two previous wives. I notice that Imran Khan, Pakistani Prime Minister, also had a Jewish wife, suggesting Jewish approaches similar to what happened in China. Incidentally, Khan must be one of the tiny number of politicians who are good-looking, though I'm not sure what that proves.

I recommend the 1911 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica to people interested in the past of India. Archive.org has a copy online—Vol 14, HUSBAND to ITALIC. Try here: https://archive.org/details/Encyclopaediabri14chisrich_201303/page/n475/mode/2up The articles are written by people (men usually) with experience of India and with attitudes which certainly seem to be honest and still optimistic. And they pre-date both world wars, and partition in 1948, and the Jewish control of paper money in 1913.

India is about the size of Europe up to the Baltic; and about the size of the USA; and about the size of China. The usual simple map projections hide this fact. Some of the material on India deals with geology, geography, history, and people. In 1911, India was supposed to have 147 languages, and the numbers of speakers; Indo-Aryans with 219,780,590 being the maximum then. (The figures are given almost to the last digit; I'd guess so they don't need to indicate the significant figures). They list 42,881 Semitic speakers, presumably Jews.
There's a curious absence of assessment; the aim is implicitly assumed to be the conquest of India.
A modern view is that the rulers of seagoing people of Britain, France, the Netherlands, and Portugal were carrying out Jewish policies by fighting each other, but of course the Britannica does not say anything like that. Books like Imperialism 1902 by J A Hobson seem to have introduced the idea that empires make profits, which was seized on by Lenin and Jews generally, possibly to distract from Jews. Taxes on opium (grown to be forced on China) and salt (I'm guessing made by the sea, or mined in the north) were the largest sources of revenue.
The longest part of the pages on India is 'Under the Company'. 'The Company' is the East India Company. This is a list of battles, princes, rivalries, growth of towns such as Bombay and Calcutta, and the importation of mostly British methods—Victorian-design houses, railways and stations, competitive exams for civil servants—though exams seem to have helped cheating to flourish—and many once-famous memes—the black hole of Calcutta, the Mutiny, Plassey, Warren Hastings, Sikhs, Gurkhas, Lord Curzon, Lord Minto. 'Under the Crown' took over from the Company when Disraeli made Victoria Empress of India; this must have been related to the Opium trade.
EIC.pdf is an article from Miles Mathis's website on the East India Company.
In the USA these days, Jew-funding to 'Black Lives Matter' produces messages like this one to whites: you earned or inherited your money through oppressing people of color, which of course is typical of Jews' slogans as they try to divide with silly promises before their vicious rule. They seem to have difficulty in finding competent people.
As far as I know, nobody has carefully analysed empires, though there are obvious commercial things such as metal ores, gold and silver, fish, coffee, gasoline/petroleum, tar, water. But most everyday items are not imported; housing, infrastructure, some transport devices, food are built in situ. Oppressing 'people of color' and whites was a Jewish habit, though Arab slavers may have preceded them.

Interpolation on opium. Britannica says:
In 1907-1908 the net opium revenue from both sources amounted to £3,576,000. The Chinese government having issued an edict that the growth and consumption of opium in China should be entirely suppressed within ten years, the government of India accordingly agreed in 1908 that the export of opium from India should be reduced year by year, so that the opium revenue would henceforth rapidly decline and might be expected to cease altogether. This is vague (and doesn't hint at compensation, or whether the 'edict' would be respected).

Macro-views of long-term India, and foreigners in India.
[1] This is Buckle, in the mid-19th century:

... in those countries where there has been no change of religion, history is more trustworthy and connected than in those countries where such a change has taken place. In India, Brahmanism, which is still supreme, was established at so early a period, that its origin is lost in the remotest antiquity. ... the native annals [including bardic long rhymes, and the Rig Veda] have never been corrupted by any new superstition; and the Hindus are possessed of historic traditions more ancient than can be found among any other Asiatic people.

The caste system, with Brahmins (I think) at the top, has been illegal for years, theoretically at least.

While the superstitions of Jews have infested everything, like persistent toxic weeds overcoming native growths. Consider the megalith builders of Europe, whose beliefs are lost.

[2] India was attacked from the north by Moslems. And during the European sailing ships era, Portuguese attacked by sea to the west, and Dutch, English, and French to the east, including Bengal, which was, or had the reputation, of being wealthy.

[3] British wars in India: L. Fry in The Jews and the British Empire says:

India is gained by a succession of wars: Three Burmese Wars, 1823, 1882, 1885; War against the Mohammedan rulers of Sind; two Sikh Wars, 1845, 1848; two Afghan Wars, 1838, 1878; Chinese War in 1856. The British go through the horrors of the Black Hole of Calcutta and of the Indian Mutiny of 1857 to defend the rights of the East India Company.
True, though ignoring the costs of weapons, presumably paid for by loans from Jews, and repayments to Jews. This process was regarded by the 'historian' Hugh Trevor-Roper/Lord Dacre as a reason for the sense of British 'public school' education reading into Caesar's Wars—but not of course into war debt. As I say, I doubt the cost-benefit of big wars has ever been estimated.

[4] During the days of the East India Co, atrocity stories about the British circulated: maiming of Indian weavers, unfair trading, forced famines, theft of jewels, and so on. Modern stories of evils seem to have forgotten that, and also to omit Jewish actions: http://whale.to/c/think_india_should_be_grateful.html lists five evils—
1. Partition in 1948 into India and Pakistan, Pakistan being an invented name. East Pakistan, Bangla Desh, followed.
2. Bengal Famine in 1943.
3. Amritsar Massacre 1919
4. Operation Blue Star (1984) and the Golden Temple
5. British seizure of Delhi, 1857, during the Sepoy Mutiny.

[5] Jews in India. The following is from the The Jewish Year Book centenary edition 1996 [5756-5757] page 150:

<<< This extract is from the Jewish Yearbook in England of 1996; presumably 1896 was some miraculously important year to the self-styled 'G-d's Chosen'.

Anyone with experience of Jewish policies will understand that the statements made by official Jews need not bear any relation to the truth.

Amyarta Sen

Two online sources are https://scholar.harvard.edu/sen/biocv and the Guardian article https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/29/british-empire-india-amartya-sen

The Guardian article is by Sen. (Note: it has an annoying plea for money and a cookie permission page. Ignore these!) He dates British rule from Plassey for 200 years. He recommends Adam Smith on India, though using expressions such as 'gross national product' which grate. It's disappointing to find little in the way of assessment of the empire. He mentions Jews once, as coming into the country in small numbers (see the previous page on India). He mentions Karl Marx, but not Marx's very wealthy Jewish relations and financiers. I have to assume he formed a Jewish unit with his Rothschild wife. He allies himself with Moslems, without mentioning the aspects of massacre and plunder associated with Moslems—and without mentioning the Jewish roots of Islam.
He dislikes 'Fundamentalist' Indians, speaking of them as the Jewish media speak of whites who think their contributions ought to be recognised. I conclude that world-wide Jews want a movement led nominally by Moslems against Indians. This sounds very much like Partition, where arms were supplied to both sides, and the supposed British policy of partition was applied—as it was it most or all of ex-British Empire countries given 'independence'. There seem to be few Christians in India, but quite a few colonies of Jehovah's Witnesses and similar Jewish oddities. But Christianity never seems to have appealed to Indians; I like to think because it was obviously nonsense, but this may not be the real reason or reasons.
Let me just mention that 'Jingo' is from the Basque word for God. In 1877, Russophobes were convinced the Czar intended to take possession of Constantinople, and command the Black Sea, endangering our Indian possessions. This sounds to me another Jewish issue, transmitted to Britain's simple rulers.
The Harvard biography starts with this paragraph:

Amartya Sen is Thomas W. Lamont University Professor, and Professor of Economics and Philosophy, at Harvard University and was until 2004 the Master of Trinity College, Cambridge. He is also Senior Fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows. Earlier on he was Professor of Economics at Jadavpur University Calcutta, the Delhi School of Economics, and the London School of Economics, and Drummond Professor of Political Economy at Oxford University.

I can't resist pointing out that the Cambridge History of Communism (3 volumes; this is Cambridge, England) with vol 1 entitled World Revolution and Socialism in One Country 1917–1941 seems to be standard Jewish lies.

Sen has written books since 1960. His awards include the, or an, Eisenhower award, and a Nobel 'Laureate' in economics. Eisenhower was of course a Jew, promoted to the top despite his lack of qualifications—apart from Jewishness. Rather like accepting a Stalin award. The Nobel Prize scheme did not include economics; a similar-sounding award was invented so that Jews could pretend to be innovators in economics.
If anyone should dare to ask what he's actually achieved, well, he looks a lifetime puppet, like Chomsky. No surprise, really. Don't expect anything from this person.

You might like to look at India nuclear power myths from some time back. India and Pakistan and Bangla Desh have all been dragged into the post-1945 'reset' established by Jews. Similar things apply to other Jewish frauds: moon landings, World War 2 beliefs, climate change; I'd guess some—salt as toxic, wonders of fluoride, are less likely, though the Jewish 'COVID' and earlier frauds such as 'AIDS' seem to be limping along in the 'Third World'.