Denial   Movie 2016,  DVD 2017.
Reviews & Study Notes   by Rerevisionist   14 May 2019

Maybe actors will be allowed to add a message that their part in the film was distorted by Jews? At present Equity would not allow it
Do they really have 'negative checkers'?
The BBC trains many non-whites. They have of course expensive equipment and studios, and this must be an effective anti-white strategy of the BBC scum.
I was amused to see a section of barbed wire secured with inner hex bolts (Allen key/ IKEA style). An anachronism?
Quite a lot of legal advisors: Latham and Watkins, LLP, Sheridans, James Kay, Anwen Griffiths, Martin Humm of Micshcon [sic] de Reya
BBC Films 'senior business manager' given as Michael Wood

        • Oxford and Cambridge Historians   Start of 'Denial' file
Modern historians … like irradiated insects … emerge from their maggot stage, to flit about and fuck up their juniors into sterility.

Let's survey the academic world over the centuries, to remind ourselves how unintelligent it has been. So much so, that even Jewish Talmudism had more to say. Clearly, this has to change.

Wiki says 'George I established the Regius Professorship of Modern History at Cambridge in 1724. 'The only history studied dealt with ancient Greece and Rome.' This isn't quite correct: the Bible was regarded as 'history', and had huge—mostly damaging—influence when it was finally (after 1000 years) translated with state approval into English. Most people of the time believed in such things as Noah's Ark and The Flood. King George, who was German, reasonably enough wanted German history to be studied, and, as he was King, paid for the new Chair. 'History was for many years a branch of Moral Sciences. A fully autonomous Historical Tripos dates from 1875. Since then Cambridge has boasted a series of renowned historians such as Lord Acton, G.M. Trevelyan, Herbert Butterfield, Geoffrey Elton and J.H. Plumb.' All of those were Jew-unaware, excepting Elton. Subjects such as economic history and legal history (F W Maitland, 1888) were even later. No wonder English people were surprised by the Great War. H G Wells after about 1920 did his best to provide a world history, but never properly came to grips with the Jewish questions.
      'The Cambridge Faculty of History is [today] one of the largest history departments in the world. The Faculty has consistently obtained the highest ratings in official evaluations for teaching and research.' You have to laugh at the 'official evaluations'.

      On Richard Evans, his doctoral advisor was Anthony J. Nicholls at Oxford. 'Nicholls attempts to discover the reasons for the apparently disappointing relationship between the two countries, but also addresses the numerous areas of activity—for example, diplomacy, military cooperation, higher education and scientific research—in which friendly collaboration is the rule rather than the exception. He will try to assess what part resentments on both sides after the Second World War played in conditioning the atmosphere between the two countries, and to what extent the commercial media have caused frictions on both sides.'—says Wiki.
      None of the biographies show concern over Jewish issues, astonishingly. Two examples: Regius Prof of History, Oxford, 1997—2011 was Robert John Weston Evans, who published about 50 items from 1971, none (I looked) about Jews. Regius Professor of History, Cambridge from 1996-2008 was Quentin Skinner 'regarded as one of the founders of the Cambridge School of the history of political thought'. It's unimaginable that he would for example have written anything useful on the NSDAP, Neocons, etc.

Obviously enough, there is huge scope for serious history; I cannot say whether good work will emerge—there is a huge deadweight of inertia and money power crushing it.

        • Beginning of the Jewish Endgame?   Start of 'Denial' file
What People Still Don't Understand The Second World War was "against National Socialist Germany" is a typical formulation which ignores Jews acting as a network in most countries in the world. "Jews came from Russia only 50 years ago, but every day they say how racist the USA is" is typical of people who haven't understood the worldwide networking system. Jews in fact largely ran the major countries as secretly as possible. Jews admit they hate other races, at present whites. "They've formed alliances with every other race..' and pay people to say what Jews want; many people think of 'new' speakers, such as Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela and Yiannopoulos and Jordan Peterson and 'Social Justice Warriors', as self-directed people, rather than puppets of money. Some Americans even think "the 1950s were a golden age of peace." It may be that times will change, as they have in the past; or it may be that truth can be buried.
      'Revisionism' is not just a set of independent findings; there must be historical laws, repeating processes, and generalising ideas. Serious history must find these, but in my view the whole movement is rather new. I don't include people like Bertrand Russell as 'revisionists'; they didn't have a clue. There were revisionists who wrote—Belloc, Ramsay, Leese, Thorkelson—but their books and pamphlets had small circulations. Germany, Italy, and Japan had their authors, but the ease with which fakes were promoted engenders uncertainty.

The First Wave of Revisionism May be dated from 2000 and the widespread use of Internet. As in other times, many pioneers falter. Many people are aware of sensationalism and lies, false flags, staged deceptions, general fakery, and elaborate literary and media implants. The evidence of lying prolonged for years may redound against Abrahamic religions, which can be portrayed convincingly as yet another Judaic fraud (with bribery and violence). Roman Catholics and other Christians and Muslims on the world stage, hoping for revivals, combined with unmistakable evidence of dishonesty, may finally sink these unsatisfactory structures. Since Irving's legal action, 9/11 has been a defining event, forcing people who think about these things to take sides; most so far do not accept Jew lies. 9/11 and subsequent planned 'Neocon' wars make the Holohoax somewhat outdated, except financially, with tired nonentities backing it, and wasting the time of the revisionists.

      • David Irving still hasn't identified the full possibilities of Jewish cohesion, notably in WW2. He announced at some point that he is now anti-Semitic. But many archives are still closed to him.
      • Michael A Hoffman II has worked on Talmudic stuff (at personal risk). He is a staunch Roman Catholic, and seems to me to underestimate the interaction of Judaics with Christianity, which they more or less invented. And Jewish activity has expanded since Talmudic times, so modernised interpretations of Judaic aims, strategies and tactics are in my view essential.
      • Kevin B MacDonald of the The Occidental Observer attended Irving's action to testify about his books. But since then he (in my view) has made little progress. Despite 9/11 and endless (((American))) wars, he shies away from serious topics, and seems unaware of the good reasons why many people justifiably hate Americans. He has finished a book on individualism and liberalism.
      • Arthur R Butz as far as I know has confined himself to the 'Holocaust'. Youtubers include Ramzpaul, but Youtube is censoring frantically are presumably will be replaced by other video sites, if this remains possible.

There have been deaths: Robert Faurisson recently. And of long-term fraudsters such as Eli Weisel and Simon Weisenthal.

The Second Wave of Revisionism has a star in Miles Williams Mathis, with many writings, including many frauds perpetrated on Americans. His 2016 Beerhall Putsch and 2017 'Nazis' as Jews are just two examples. He has about ten guest writers. Here's my search engine to search Mathis' site (he doesn't have his own).
My own site has many topics which I count as 'revisionist'. The problem is that machine production now is so efficient that huge numbers of people of no great skill are supported, and can be pushed into harm, evil, and waste. The situation is analogous to the Middle Ages, with Archbishops, Bishops, church builders, endless priests and vicars, sermons and chapbooks, pardoners and summoners, church schools, abbeys and priories and what have you, replaced by people who think they are favourites of 'god'. Imagine the mental death of people 'working' in the BBC or New York Times, turning out lies day after day. There must be a serious possibility of widespread collapse into something like the Soviet Union, with poverty and hunger and incompetence, with such things as electric power and water not working, and a parasitic group unable to do anything useful. Or perhaps into something like parts of Africa, with food as rare as sewage is common.

There are many topics needing workovers. Some are quite technical, though this may be appearance more than reality. Such as:
  • revision of world history, including Christianity, Islam, and provoking of wars;
  • Penetration of aristocracies;
  • War aims, including population destruction, assets and rents, control of laws; and calculations as to whether hosts benefit;
  • Money, including misdirections such as interest;
  • Language and media control, including big lies;
  • Direction of shares and percentages and payments from rich organisations, including the 'Fed';
  • Legal adjustments to Jews;
  • Networking with collaborators.

      An example of a repeating historical process is Jews using paper money to fund nuisances, thugs, etc. Good examples are Soros and his anti-white activities, lawyers and activists involved in the USA in 'Civil Rights' with busing and race mixing in schools, which have damaged whites' education and lives, Jews funding fake think tanks who then fund massive frauds, such as nuclear weapons, climate change fantasies, 'the Holocaust', AIDS, vaccines, even low salt diets. Jews fund scams to get uneducated blacks into Europe, with the deliberate intention of ruining or weakening their countries. Jews fund housing aid, so money is channeled to illegals who are likely to absorb resources forever. Jews fund legal hassles against anyone the choose. Jews fund fake activists: at the time of the Boer War, thugs would beat up people speaking against those Jewish wars. Jews fund universities, which are half full of worthless Jewish and other nonentities, doing nothing but promote absurd ideas. Particularly disastrous is Jew funding of weapons. There are continual payouts, ultimately from real goods made by whites, to projects which need to be stopped.

        • Conclusions   Start of 'Denial' file
The concept of intra-human parasitism offers a new solution to problems of war, violence, and otherwise unexpected events, which, to most people, seemed to come from nowhere. In my view it's the most important new Western way to interpret human history since Darwin. Some of the activity of parasites is concerned to weaken and invade.

The rage of 'Jews' against whites has been kept a close secret, as is necessary when a war has not been won. Many people today have no idea of the seething hatred of 'Jews', their planning, their pleasure in war deaths, and their instinctive drives in those directions. As long as huge moneys are extorted by the holohoax scam, presumably there will be more fake museums, fake books, fake historians, spurious survivors, fake witnesses, and (relevant here) scribblers, producers, directors, actors, distributors—all of them rented shit. Many people still have no idea about arrangements of the 'Federal Reserve' type, and the consequent ownership by Jews of modern media (for example) Google, Youtube, Facebook, probably EIG web hosts.

The shame of 'Jews'—the 'chosen'—is their habitual lying, which seems to them not even a choice. This has been remarkably 'successful' at a price to them of uncreative tedious repetition and journeying through deserts of narrowed fanatical word games. It's curious how parasitically dependent they are on the talents of others. The Jewish 20th century needed engines, flight, electricity, radio, TV, chemistry—giving easier transport, easier communication, monopolies of media to their rather sad sheep, and weaponry of unprecedented destructive power. New technology may alleviate these processes: DNA analysis may make it impossible to flee after committing crimes; if Internet retains some freedom of speech, or even increases it, Jewish lies on their traditional huge scale, will be more difficult; filing of personal details may prevent crypto-Jews remaining hidden.
      Bottom line: of course Jews know of their frauds, though probably even they would be astonished at some of their tucked-away long-term lies. The general public, cowed and more or less impotent, are—perhaps—awakening. As an example, Trump's lies and his dependence on Jews, all with the same mindset, make the idea that Hitler was a small part of a large army of Jews very plausible.

Note that revisionism is, obviously to Jews, somewhat of an unimportant distraction: endless Jewish wars continue, while environments degrade, most of the near east is ruined, Palestinians are shot, weapons are supplied to puppet regimes. And nothing is done.

Counter-policies may develop, to counter the world-wide, distributed 'nation' of Jews and their semi-secret language. World-wide Jew-aware parties, civil servants, patriots, lawyers might unite in opposition. Religions may be able to throw off their antiquated tethers. Paper money seems too efficient to remove, but frauds and huge repayments might be chargeable to Jews. Anti-Jew measures need to be implemented; since Jew power is largely mediated by money, perhaps a percentage of bribes may be legally retained as commission wile Jews are prosecuted severely. The world needs new, effective, policies in place of specious slogans driving to long-term disaster. Wearying Judeo-BBC trash like Denial may yet be replaced by something better.   Start of 'Denial' file