How Jews Won World War 2
The Second World Wars as Jewish-Scripted Mass Murder and Destruction: How the ‘Master Race’ of ‘Jew’ Supremacists Started and Won the Second World Wars.
— including —
Was Hitler an Agent of Jews?
by Rae West ('Rerevisionist'). First upload April 14th 2018
Not complete, obviously! I'll update online.
Version v. 25 December 2023
Depressing Introduction |
First World War Note—Even its Critics Seem Unable to Give Their Reasons |
The belief that WW2 was a hoax |
Jews in Other Wars |
Link to my crit of Unz's feeble material, purporting to re-examine WW2 |
The Jewish Missing Link in the Second World War |
Hitler's Financial Policy |
Prelude Around the First World War (long) |
Clues: Equipment, Constructions, Agreements, Records |
My Working Theories of the Two World Wars
'British' Empire? |
Jews in Berlin | Poverty and Call-ups | Speculation on Douglas Bader
| Hitler and German Population
| The Age of Manufactured Dictators Begins |
How Most People Still See the Second World War |
'Jews'. Christianity: Roman, Orthodox, Protestant. And Islam |
Arabs and Spain |
WW2 Revisionism (so far) |
Evacuees & 'Blitz' |
Laziness | Amphetamines etc |
Jew Violence |
A Londoner on wartime London |
New ‘Holistic History’ including Jews |
Missing History |
Understanding & Opposing |
War Patterns |
Hitler?? A Jewish Agent?? Q&A, Many Verbatim Claims Answered
| 11 points | 10 points | Bernt Busch | Hitler's worldview | Jan | More
| Benton Bradberry (INTERMEDIATE PHASE of Revisionism) |
Capt K R McKilliam (INTERMEDIATE PHASE of Revisionism) |
John Wear (INTERMEDIATE PHASE of Revisionism) |
Jim Condit Jr (INTERMEDIATE PHASE of Revisionism) |
(MORE INTERMEDIATES) Richard Dawkins, Nick Griffin, Michael A Hoffman II, David Irving, Kevin MacDonald |
Concentration Camps |
Testing the Hypothesis that the NSDAP was Jew-controlled |
Jewish Genetics |
Overview of Jew Activities. Infiltration, PsyOps ... | ... Disguised Jew Infiltration in UK |
Before WW2: Russia & USSR, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Small Countries, Hungary, Ukraine, Poland, USA,
4 Aug 2022 MIDWAY Japan, China New opinions on China and Japan (In which we summarise how the Phoenician Empire took the Chrysanthemum Throne of Japan Long!) taken from Miles Mathis and his colleagues. Most significance on Japan, and its takeover by US power for diversion against Russia. (Compare Jews in Britain since 17th century). Second World War in the northern Pacific revealed to be non-existent. Mostly relies on maps and images. | Japanese Antics in Occupied China | Aleutian Campaign Made Up | Guadalcanal: Fiction | Australia | Midway | Wake Island
Pearl Harbor | Pearl Harbor: Fake Skirmishes |
Story of Jewish takeover of China is far more fragmentary.
|
Kristallnacht 9/11 |
'Nazi-Soviet' Pact |
Churchill's Character and Clues |
Churchill & Lindemann bombing |
Churchill as agent from the start |
WW2 Anomalies, 1939ish–1945ish Olds on low bombers | wrong side | Hitler could have mined, not declared war on USA | Air mines? | Declaration Germany vs USA | Germany vs USA | Montgomery | J Hoffman | Vichy | Dunkirk | Hitler 7 points | Kursk battle | Germans and Jews | Arnhem | Jew goals | Kill whites | Patton murdered?
|
Pre-War and Wartime Intelligence | 'Secret Listeners | Bletchley Park / Ritchie Boys |
After WW2 | Colin Jordan | Post-War Alternative Intelligence e.g. Miles Mathis | Trump as Hitler? Putin as Stalin? |
Revisionism: How to Reconsider WW2 Sources Includes Montgomery 'of Alamein', Koch, Reinhard Gehlen, '2194 Days of War' |
Bullet-Pointed Short Summary of This Idea, emailed to David Irving, with reply
Depressing Introduction
2022: Biden is obviously an inserted puppet, as in 2018 Trump was clearly a puppet of Jews. Putin is, too. The evidence is clear; or at least appears to be:– no discussion of the 'Federal Reserve', no discussion of the Holohoax, no discussion of bases, war crimes, Soros, COVID, no discussion of 9/11, just for 'starters'. They have decided it's time for a new cull of whites, as Jews and their collaborators did in WW2.
The point of this piece is to move the traditional Jewish-pushed view of WW2 to an accurate view, based on estimates of Jew world power at the time.
My view now is: Both world wars were about–
• 1 Killing as many goyim as possible (or possibly killing in numbers specified in the Talmud), using propaganda power to ignite wars between what were described as 'nations', and prolong them, and get simpletons to fight with new, powerful, dangerous, expensive weapons. This is not the traditional view—but consider what happened AFTER WW2 was supposed to have ended—millions of deaths in eastern Europe and Russia. This was intended! And
• 2 Using Jew money power to exchange worthless money to collect as many assets from goyim as possible-
visible assets: gold, silver, housing, farms, usable water, factories, transport, and
less visible: legal and financial assets, notably control of banks and control of legal systems, and ownership, rents, secret alliances of the 'Freemason' and education types. And
• 3 Founding Israel and probably other, secret, locations. The NSDAP-Jewish 'leaders' agreement (
Haavara Agreement) was important in putting German infrastructure into Palestine at German expense.
... and it took me years to interpret the world this way, with Jews as a secret separate power bloc, interacting with Jewish puppets and Jewish subservients around the world. And Jews themselves as a hybrid collection of opportunist thugs, fanatics with a quasi-religious myth of origin, and second-rate rejects from aristocracies and other families, party groups, police, and so on, with their own training in deception.
Here's a good example of an obvious point, buried very successfully. I just noticed (on 1st July 2019) that the British Alliance with Poland—I've known for years, through Hilaire Belloc, that Poland had a high proportion of Jews—was not with Poles, but with Jews in Poland who controlled that country. Once you see it, it is obvious. So we have Jews in Poland dealing with Jews in Britain via Churchill, and Jews in the USA, and Jews in the USSR nominally under Stalin, all deciding what they would do, in secret. They probably synchronised with Hitler, arranging Jews in Poland to start the war with Germany, then Jews in Poland secretly arranging for Stalin to invade Poland. No doubt Poles died, and raised the white death toll; but Jews in Poland were not killed.
For USA readers: Note that Jews can treat each state as they do countries, by controlling news between states so that black crime, Jewish fraud, migration numbers, education standards and so on are minimised for other states. Same with money flows, unemployment, etc.
I've just found (by looking at logs of this website) hitler-the-jew-and-the-faked-wwii.blogspot.com which is an early site on this topic, by Hexzane527, apparently French. Its entries date from 2013 to 2015. It is still a live site.
Note on the inability of critics of the 'Great War' to clearly state their positions. This must be (at least partly) because even the basic vocabulary barely exists.
The following comments are verbatim from the
Occidental Observer on the WW1 Christmas truce. (They are not in the piece itself. Generally these articles are evasive).
See with what difficulty they try to describe their beliefs. And yet these are the more literate examples. (I have n way to know whether the moderators removed better ones).
Even the figures of speech are dominated by Jews: the 'west' as 'Christian', the one single 'God' idea, the 'God damn them to Hell' type of thing, praying for this or that, 'we' to include all people in a geographical area. Just as simple singers sing 'Hosannah' and praise 'Jesus'.
Other aspects are more difficult to spot, for example Jewish innumeracy. There are no numbers, proportions, ratios or whatever, which may be a result of their assigning importance exclusively to themselves. This habit is widespread amongst critics, unfortunately.
Edward Harris says:
December 26, 2019 at 8:17 am
We never hear about:
The Indian Princes offered 10 mlillion troops to the London Government in 1915, but the offer was refused. Edith Cavell saw American Ships giving meat, in occupied Belgium, to the German Arny.(1 million tons in 1915 alone)The British Government told the Germans to shoot her because she was writing to the Times.
Humanitarian Aid from America! Before the Balfour Declaration, ships from Dixie supplied the Central Powers through Spain, the islands and the then neutral Italy. Yankee ships supplied Germany through Scandanavia, Holland and Belgium.
The European Empires were bled to death with American loans
The European Empires were being dismanteld. In 1900 Canada, Australia and New Zealand were given Dominion Status.
The UK was working on India, South Africa(!) and Ireland.This was stopped by the Convert Jews creating WW1. According to Trotsky’s family, one of the reasons the Convert Jews created WW1 was to stop the World becoming Christian.
ERIC SMITH says:
December 25, 2021 at 5:40 am
Clearly both wars were created by the jew for many agendas, as usual.
They can can manipulate circles around us seemingly effortlessly by virtue of breeding and training of thousands of years. Some goals are listed here.
Create Israel with Balfour (to get the goy to commit) and then WWll and “holocaust” (to make the unwilling goy actually follow thru and drive a bunch of happy well treated jews to move to an arab filled god forsaken desert).
Destroy faith of whites in their culture and self determination (while teaching the goy a good lesson on the “futility of war”, they take good care of us don’t they).
Weakening Russia further to make the takeover of Russia possible.
Settle their bitter score with both Russia and Germany, who these wretches hate in particular for reasons which I won’t list here but Luther and the Rus destruction of the Khazar kingdom are a couple.
Create communist states which are really only jewish totalitarianism.
Make crony capitalism ever more powerful while making massive fortunes on war production deals.
And finally have a really good laugh at watching the goy slaughter each other by the millions.
God damn these people to hell.
charles frey says:
December 25, 2021 at 8:32 pm
What a coincidence: December 23, 1917, sees the creation of the Federal Reserve, with unlimited fiat funds. The preparations for WWI run parallel and finally boil over a few months later.
The junior Dulles brothers at the US Legation in Berne arrange Lenin’s sealed train through Germany, with an eight hour stop in Berlin, where the Kaiser is advised by Hamburg Banker Warburg with relatives at Kuehn Loeb & Co., NYC, with “opposing” family sides representing the Allies and the second Reich at Versailles.
And with Kuehn Loeb principal Shiff funding NY demonstrations for the Bolshevik Revolution, which the local Jews referred to as OUR THING, before contributing 2,000 + ” RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONARIES ” from the North Eastern states to Petrograd via Vancouver
Where the British Observer for their Foreign Office describes them as well-funded, well-dressed, with red carnations in their lapels and money for evening bar visits. [ Which coincidentally describes both Trudeau, father and son, just to your north ].
Poupon Marx says:
December 25, 2021 at 12:37 pm
I think the answers to your questions are not to be found in singular cause and effect, stimulus and response methods of inquiry. The West, i.e., Christendom, has been led down a reductionistic path of simple, one channel cause and effect. This channel, over-relying on the determinism of materialism will prove, as it has, inadequate to make adequate sense of the World
Thus, to understand this particular phenomenon of your query requires an exploration of influences unseen, unperceived by the usual understanding of sensate inputs. This is largely been influenced by the tragic influence of what has become known as the Judea-Christian heritage. This incomplete, tragically inadequate codex of Abrahamic amalgamations of irrelevancy, surrogate responsibility, outsourcing outcomes unquestionably, and more, has had the overall effect of limitation of exploration, deepening of understanding, and resolution detente.
I have endeavored to explain and expand on more profound understandings, but have received no interest or response. I take that to mean the vast majority of people in the West are locked into their failed tools of truly understanding who and what, and from whence. In other words, the Garden Wall and its confines are self satisfying.
charles frey says:
December 28, 2021 at 8:18 am
01 “Armistice” connotes everyone quit and go home: a draw. The gangster burdens placed on Germany, including its reparations, which were finally paid off a few years ago, demonstrate anything but an “armistice”. So we simplistically alter it to Memorial Day.
02 The former Soviet Union’s archives quickly became more accessible than those of the oldest modern Democracy.
03 Predictably, we learned nothing. Look at General Wesley Clark on video, where he reluctantly relates a casual visit to the Pentagon, only to be told, that the US is planning to unhinge 7 Middle East nations [ which he enumerates ] during the ensuing 5 years. Which indeed occurred.
The idea that the whole of WW2 was a hoax
It seems to be true that WW2 was organised behind the scenes by Jews, who of course are distributed world-wide, and their collaborators: USA paper money, London finance, the Moscow and Soviet empire, France corrupted by Freemasons ("francmaçons"), Jewish penetration into China, etc.
The world was divided into regions by Jews, which enabled them to arrange propaganda appropriate to each region.
The USA was not bombed. Britain was spared much bombing, but Germany was not. France was reputedly bombed more than any country except Germany. The newspaper and radio propaganda was controlled for each region, and the different languages allowed each region to be pinpointed. So the various areas were treated separately.
Consider the post-war situations: with eg Korea, Vietnam or Afghanistan, no US operations were reported accurately in the USA. During WW2, complete censorship applied. The truth about Hiroshima and Nagasaki—they were fire-bombed—was completely censored, as it still is in Japan, as my own site logs show.
I don't want to give endless examples—Greece, Italy, north Africa, Estonia, Lithuania, Eire, ....—but
the idea that the entire WW2 was a hoax is credible only in a few countries to people who haven't understood the world's zones of propaganda at the time.
But, on the other hand, look at this black and white photo, from In Darkest Germany, by Victor Gollancz, published by Victor Gollancz in London, 1947. Gollancz was a Jewish propagandist. Bear in mind that models and fakes were used in the black and white movie film industry which flourished in the 1930s, and that cinema newsreels included fake atomic bomb images. Do those images of ruined buildings with identical undetailed window sizes stacked in narrow buildings look genuine?
Miles Mathis in dresden.pdf (January 28, 2016) gives a series of variously-faked images, his article having been avoided by 'experts' (as far as I know). So there are problems.
Jews and Other Wars
Are Jews under-represented? Paul Bustion: I do tend to believe that Jews are overrepresented in the military, not underrepresented in it. I believe that they would need a substantial presence in the military in order to either start wars or to hoax them or to do some combination of both. In order to have genocides, or to hoax them, they need a presence in the military.
I believe that in having these wars, both in real wars and in hoaxed wars, Jews need to be pulling the strings and in the case of real wars, arranging in advance who wins and who loses, and in the case of hoax wars, hoaxing battles. And Jews need a substantial presence in the militaries of both sides for that to work, and further, they need to have people in both military who are not only Jews, but closely related to Jews in the enemy's military, for this to work. For these reasons, I believe that Jews are overrepresented in the military. I believe that the AntiJews who originated the claim that Jews are underrepresented in the military were likely crypto-Jews trying to cover up Jewish control and influence in the military, so that people would not figure out that Jews are starting wars and hoaxing events. By couching the argument that Jews are underrepresented in the military as an insult against Jews, pointing to it as proof of their cowardice and of their manipulation of the Goyim into dying in wars for them, it prevents people from suspecting that the claim is being made in order to prevent suspicion against Jews, so people just accept the claim without question.
RW: Thanks for clarifying your claim on Jews being over-represented, so they could affect the result in their favour. A claim which I can't recall ever hearing before. The received view is that Jews go for the financial positions (Baruch in the Great War obvious example) and in intelligence, eg at Bletchley Park. And in high-level posts, eg Roosevelt and Eisenhower. And in world propaganda: newspapers, books, radio, film, TV. It's not that easy to test; you have to look at many wars and assess Jewish interests, then try to work out who were Jews if any...
|
... As in this diagram. Source not known to me; and the meaning of generals who were/are political appointments isn't entirely clear. |
Probably in most wars since 1600 most of the combatants had no good idea of what they were doing.
Here's another example: Lincoln had seven Jewish Generals, according to the 'Cleveland Jewish News' at https://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/archives/lincoln-had-7-jewish-generals/article_2767508e-9662-5da8-a1f5-c711ed25ae68.html
Another set of Jewish links applies to the Jewish takeover of China, to make it 'Communist'. Much of the activity was propaganda for the world outside China. For example, the so-called 'Rape of Nanking' or Nanjing allegedly in December 1937. A 1997 book by Iris Chang, with 'a journalism degree from the University of Illinois', revived this fake, an equivalent to the anti-German propaganda of Jews everywhere. Why not try finding a video, occasionally online, by Japanese people, titled something like 'All the photos of the 'Nanking Massacre' are faked'.
Jewish Propaganda Books includes Victor Gollancz and other liars. This is another story in list of the 20th century Jewish frauds and massacres. But note that they often preferred to use cheap mercenaries to carry out their work, which meant that survivors were left with hatred for the wrong targets.
My attention was drawn to a site by UNZ, purporting to be revisionism of WW2 by a Jew. I've edited it down, and put it on my site,
here. It's old stuff, fake revisionism plus product placement. Interesting as a sample, but I recommend not spending time on it.
I watched part of an 8-hour DVD, made from my VHS tape in 1991, showing a few days of TV 'News' in Britain about war on Iraq. Youtube removed my channel, without permission; so has Bitchute, obviously just another controlled site.
Anyway, here's my brief commentary: The scenes of bombers, locations presumably hidden, the rather (but not very) highly-paid actors reading out the anonymous communal words assembled from Jew controllers, the mixed-race general (or something), the zombie talking-doll politicians, the scenes of simple unquestioning soldiery who think dropping bombs is 'fighting', the announcement that the armed forces will have a pay rise, the careful avoidance of information on likely damage and deaths, on atrocities, and on anything invisible—assets which may be grabbed, mortgages on building, land, entire countries, ownerships, central banks which may be set up, laws which may be imposed, debts which can add to impoverishment—chemical effects on people, future joke inquiries, hatreds for Americans ...
All this is depressing, at least to me. My perception is that at the root of the modern world is Jew infiltration, and my piece extends the idea to the Second World War. We're in a world in which Jews routinely lie, but they also censor, and destroy evidence. We therefore have to rely on inference and guesswork, reinforced by observations of actual 'Jewish' behaviours. Let me summarise my view of the last two thousand years, before starting on the world's biggest war. Some of this is likely to be wrong; feel free to read other versions. But at least make some attempt to understand the world!
For whatever reasons—Cheap papyrus, and intensive reading and writing? Habitual travel, with the feeling of outsidership? A common secret language, made of terms from assorted parts of the world? Exploitation of absence of forensic techniques at the time? Exploitation of cities, evolutionarily new in human societies? Inherited psychopathologies? Lack of opposition?—'Jews'—speaking vaguely, since accuracy is impossible—developed, for want of a better word, as parasites. The Roman Empire fell, and with it many skills and techniques. However, it seems Jews exploited the remains, by intruding a new religion, bending it to their own purposes, largely be simple repetition—the endless repetition of the Holohoax fraud, now, illustrates their propaganda method. To this day many whites don't understand that Christianity is an oriental fake.
Jews pulled the same trick by inventing Islam, and tailoring that written message to groups who they thought, correctly, could be used as armed thugs.
Christianity and Islam both spread. Note the structural similarities to Judaism: they spread across many nations, with the implicit threat that, as any one time, all might act against a single member state. They each had a lingua franca, Hebrew, Latin, Greek, Arabic—the component groups or nations or tribes had representatives who could talk with each other. Another important aspect is that they provided careers: in return for literacy, some simple activities and ceremonies, and some common activities enlarging their groups, castes of the privileged, generally men, appeared, and were often very durable: Alfred North Whitehead, for example, was supposedly descended from clerical (in the religious sense) men since England was converted to Christianity, itself achieved by a mixture of methods, including violence.
It's important that increasing travel should allow regions to discuss their common interests, presumably with a common language and a hierarchy; the tragedy is that the methods were pioneered, or taken over, by secretive psychopaths.
The new nominal belief systems were at a level below ordinary European thought; one wonders if 'Jews' were intermixed with negroes, and simply were primitive in their most fundamental thinking. I wonder whether the outbursts at the present day—by freakish bearded mutilated men wearing suits fashionable in 18th century Poland—wanting rape and deaths for whites, endless wars and debt, child sex, ruining of entire countries by immigration—may be intended to provoke non-Jews into getting rid of them once and for all, to the benefit of Europeanised Jews.
Christianity and the money aspects of Judaism are popularly supposed to be in opposition, but this seems likely to be a myth; rather, the Jewish monopoly of banking must have been supported by churches, who prevented local people from taking part in financial activities, which, after all, are simple enough. Probably churches obtained tithes and priestly income (and priories, sales of indulgences, fees etc) in co-operation with Jews. Certainly, the activities of churches in the last few centuries show little concern with moral values.
Many people still think the main issue with Jews was 'usury'. This propagandist view is still promoted by Roman Catholics. In fact, this is a near-irrelevance, hiding the real issues—large-scale taxes, rents, tithes, interference with money, swindles, parasitic shareholdings, wars. The churches concealed these facts in a symbiotic relationship with Jews. As we'll see, Hitler made use of this deception.
From about 1500, when the Americas were discovered (or rediscovered) by Europeans, Jews diffused west, typically from Venice, and often by intermarriage. The East India Company grew from 1600. The Netherlands and British Isles provided ideal bases; Jews like islands (and the suggestion in the 1930s that Jews move to Madagascar would have made sense, if Africa could have been developed). The Bank of England is described as being founded in 1694, after the English 'Civil War', and the earlier Tudor Constitution of 'Merrie England' was finally replaced. The 18th century was marked by impoverishment and inflation. USA was the first country known to me established from the start as Jewish—or, more accurately, as Freemasonic. The 19th century was marked by science and technology; if we regard any society as made up partly of day-to-day construction, repair, and necessities, and partly of surplus, the white world had more surplus than ever before, directed in many ways—but secrecy about the activities of Jews was almost universal, as witness the Opium Wars against China. The twentieth century may be shown up in centuries to come as the apex of Jewish power, from which decline was inevitable. The two world wars in my view were Jewish-propelled, which is the focus of this article.
There seem to be three possibilities:
- Jewish hegemony will increase, following the Roman Empire pattern, with loss of many technical skills and rise in superstition, and general decline: including militarism, which will be too expensive and perhaps resulting in fierce actions against anyone regarded as an oppressor. At present, Jewish propaganda is frantically attempting to remove all references to Jewish media and money ownership, and to their own race policies (forced invasions, but their own exclusivity), and Jewish mass crimes, for example in the USSR, but it is possible these will be losing battles.
- Jewish hegemony will decrease, as the effects of their profits from wars and atrocities, failing propaganda, and evident lies become clear. Probably attacks against Jews, both overt and secret, will grow:-
(i) by countries, and co-operation between countries, including the USA, China, Russia, and India; possibly international groups will evolve, perhaps including US states, acting for populations, not for Jews and their puppets. Perhaps communications between Jews will be stopped, and/or spying increased;
(ii) by Jewish institutions, such as synagogues, Jew based schools, yearbooks, business organisations, and media such as the BBC;
(iii) by organisations set up to study aspects of Judaism: Talmudic study to identify typical patterns of Jewish crime and corruption, and investigation of absurdities and weaknesses; serious and uncompromising study of such things as Freemasons and Common Purpose; historical study to establish likely timelines; study of laws and lawmakers, to identify Jewish policies and strategies; educational research, to identify Jewish patterns of weakening education; medical and biological research, to look for traditional Jewish attitudes, such as poisoning and disease spreading; science research, into big frauds, NASA and 9/11 being obvious examples; and of course comparative notes between countries, of which the USA, UK, France, Germany, Russia, Hungary stand out.
- Something else. It's clear enough that historians generally have overstated the difficulties of historical work. Much of history is far more forecastable than it seemed to the Jew-naive. However, their dishonesty (or incompetence) doesn't prove that nothing new will emerge. For example, maybe laws will emerge relating population size, organisation sizes, technical details of communication, and the biology of human understanding.
'Revisionist' Work is Likely to Expand:
-
Contrary to Jewish repetitive propaganda, ‘Jews’ are not a race. Their policy, at least of the aggressive ones, has been to interbreed with other groups, in the hope of spreading their influence. There are more ‘Jewish’ surnames than in any other group. It’s only the intensive teaching that keeps them together. Many people seem to share the delusion of ‘Jews’ as a race; in fact, as with all animals, the lifetime experiences of parents are not passed to offspring. No doubt typical Jews are more fanatical, more obsessive, more liable to form lifelong attachments to groups they find themselves in, and to show extreme responses to pre-scientific stimuli. But they are not a ‘race’. They are creatures of the Talmud, and if this is removed, they will fade away. I can’t wait.
- Probably understanding of Jewish techniques will grow and cross-fertilise. It will be seen as childish and amateurish to have no awareness of Jews. Such expressions as "American policy" will be seen as pitifully incomplete if Jewish views on America are not identified as different from those of Americans. The belief in isolated heroes, Great Men, Messiahs, Monarchs will be seen as Jewish mythology, distraction from the truths that effects are obtained by large numbers of people co-operating. Weak historical generalisations such as "England has always wanted a weak and divided continental Europe" will be replaced by sounder statements, such as "Supposed English policy has been to keep Jews united in secret." Americans will take it for granted that their supposed individualism, as used two centuries ago, was a Jewish construct, and will be opposed by Jews now as they attempt to disarm them. The use of aggressive techniques by Jews (such as the written credit agreement, shetar, or starr, in medieval English documents. The basis of the shetar, or "Jewish Gage," was a lien on all property which gave a huge bas towards Jews.) which are easy enough to understand, when exposed.
- Freer understanding of white psychology—that genetic possibilities need nurture—may improve all aspects of education. Just as children teach themselves to walk, and learn language, and discover their surroundings, until they are in a preparatory stage to learn, they will not be deluged with Jewish lies, propaganda, and damaging third-rate trash. There will be better understanding of the treachery of collaborators, and the historical ways such people have been paid, used and discarded.
- An example of an occupied country: I hope the next breakthrough in human thought—if it ever happens—will be theories of human lives, abilities, and possibilities. This may mean as big a change as recognition of Darwinian facts, which make much of old European thought so feeble and unsound. Just one tiny sample from the 20th century:
The sources the Stasi [Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, or Ministry for State Security] themselves considered most important were the “unofficial collaborators”, the IMs [Inoffiziale Mitarbeiten]. The numbers are extraordinary. According to internal records, in 1988 – the last “normal” year of the GDR [German Democratic Republic] – the Ministry for State Security had more than 170,000 “unofficial collaborators.” Of these, some 110,000 were regular informers, while the others were involved in “conspiratorial” services, such as lending their flats for secret meetings, or were simply listed as reliable contacts. The Ministry itself had over 90,000 full-time employees, of whom less than 5,000 were in the HVA [Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung, Main Administration Reconnaissance] foreign-intelligence wing. Setting the total figure against the adult population in the same year, this means that one out of every fifty adult East Germans had a direct connection with the secret police. The Nazis had nothing like as many. In 1941, the full-time staff of the Gestapo, the Nazis’ Secret State Police, for the vastly larger territory of Greater Germany, including Austria and what is today the Czech Republic, was less than 15,000. Even adding the Reich Security Service and other possibly comparable units, one can still not reach anything like the Stasi proportions. We have no national figures for the number of regular informers, but it seems clear that this was also very much smaller. Over its relatively short life, starting with real popular enthusiasm and ending with five-and-a-half years of war, the Third Reich could rely much more on voluntary denunciations – as I found in those dusty People’s Court files. In East Germany, the regime was never popular to start with, and the longer it went on the more it came to rely on this huge network of informers. (From The File: A Personal History, Timothy Garton Ash, HarperCollins, London, 1997, chapter V, pp 74-5)
The Second World War's Missing Link: ‘Jews’ [ Top of page ]
• Contrary to the usual Jewish propaganda, the fact is that Jews were and are casual and relaxed about twentieth-century events. Just a few examples: A H Lane's 1934 book The Alien Menace gives details of the effortless way Jews invaded Britain, and were invited in, for example by the BBC radio of the time after the Jewish takeover in Russia in 1917. Chapters 10 ('Aliens and Revolution') and 11 ('The Hidden Hand') give a good overview. A H M Ramsay's The Nameless War (a survey from the time of Cromwell, first published in 1952) includes this:
‘ ... control shares of the
Daily Mail were for sale. ... a severe advertisement boycott had been put in operation against the paper following upon its having printed ... a pro-Franco view of the Spanish Civil War (in reality, it was just the truth), the news was no great surprise to me. ... I decided to approach a certain very wealthy and patriotic peer, the head of a great business. ... I gave [him] a survey of the activities and power of Organized Jewry in general, and of their secret publicity control in Britain in particular ... “I daren’t,” he replied, “"... I must refuse.” On our expressing astonishment that Jewry could inflict such crushing retaliation on a man of his financial strength and industrial power, and so conspicuous a national figure, he gave us details of just such retaliation directed against him by Organized Jewry ... He had refused to comply with some demands they had made of him affecting his works. After a final warning, which he ignored, a world boycott had been started against him, which had become effective in 24 hours, wherever he had agents or offices. Fires and strikes also mysteriously occurred. The resulting losses had finally compelled him to give in. Within 24 hours the boycott was lifted all over the world...’
Note that the
BBC sided with the Jewish oppression of Russia, suppressing any evidence of mass murder of tens of millions.
The 'Jack the Ripper' issue, Boer War faked agitation, 'votes for women' scam to promote war, are examples before the Great War; Jewish riots in London, for example Cable Street, carry the same message. After the Second World War, US servicemen returning to New York found huge numbers of Jews there. In the UK, the Jew-controlled ship, renamed
Empire Windrush, importing blacks into Britain into 1948 (see Andrew Joyce), just after Jewish lawyers had stated that hundreds of millions from the ex-Empire were entitled to passports. Jews were given special treatment: I was amused to see that J Gold, of vibrators for women, said her Jewish father didn't fight—he said he had hay fever. The USA had some remaining leftovers from its supposed foundation, but Jewish control of money led to frauds and waste on a scale unequalled in the whole or world history: bases around the world, fake 'astronauts', fake nuclear weapons and power, fake revolutions in for example Cuba, complete control of printed media, mass invasion of previously white countries. A truly amazing story. ...
All this is familiar to some people. If it's new to you, look at my
long historical list of Jewish activities around the world which I compiled over a number of years, and which goes back to the start of identifiably 'Jewish' material. (Within that page is
Teaching Real Jewish Studies: What Everyone Should Know About Jews—Suggestions for Awareness Courses.)
• One of the strengths of Jews has been the myopic inattentiveness and gullibility and venality of various groups of non-Jews. Here's a random selection of notes: A website of elderly ex-employees of 'Her Majesty's Stationery Office' in Britain (now gone) has many anecdotes on offices, working-practices and what have you; they helped produce endless state propaganda and lies, but have not the slightest awareness of the world. Various teachers I've known had not the remotest idea of the effects of (e.g.) Gove, when he was politically involved in education; just one example. I remember meeting Mike Todd, responsible for the technology of the BBC; he had zero idea of the influence of Jews in the world, and thence on the BBC. I recall a story of a woman near death, looking at the miscellany of badly-qualified immigrant nurses, saying "Who would have thought it would end like this?"
Jewish secrecy has been an astonishing success. One of the first modern books on the subject,
The Jews by Hilaire Belloc, was first published in 1920. Obviously, censorship by Jews has been hugely influential; the US film industry, which has never had any serious treatment of Jewish power, illustrates the point; so does e.g. my look at
Jewish propaganda books in Britain around the Second World War.
A view of 19th century history is given in Oscar Wilde's mistitled
The Rise of Historical Criticism. Which is almost entirely concerned with historians. Wilde was a classicist, but also familiar with French and German; Victor Cousin,
L'Art de Vérifier les Dates, Mommsen, and Hegel make appearances. Wilde has Herodotus and Thucydides and many others, including philosophers (Plato, Aristotle ... Spencer). And attitudes including miracles and rationalism, cycles typically with deluges marking restarts, bookish people vs men of action, ends, laws, order, oratorical and poetical presentations, critical comparison, eclectism, and attractive analogies from science. There is not the slightest trace of awareness that human groups may be parasitical. Wilde finishes with praise
at the opening of the sixteenth century, from the little Venetian printing press came forth all the great authors of antiquity, each bearing on the title page the words Aldo Menuzio, a Roman and a lover of Greece... The reference to Venice must chill any serious modern revisionary. Note that Wilde omits Maitland, an historian of the laws of Britain, who may have had some insight into the invisible aspects of history—ownership, rents, payments, expiry dates, impositions on populations.
I've just read from
Studies in Contemporary Biography by James Bryce (1903) (of the
Bryce Report, atrocity propaganda against Germany during the Great War) the chapter on Sir George Jessel (1824-1883), a Jew who was made 'Master of the Rolls', part of the intrusion into the British legal system. It's agonising to revisit the 19th century, and observe the indolent incuriosity, and the cowardly backing away, from all Jewish issues, including financing of subversions and wars, and financing of religions. Especially as Bryce was aware, to some extent, of the facts.
Two generations later, A J Toynbee continued the tradition—though to an astonishing extent; he must have been selected for the 'Royal Institute of International Affairs' precisely because of his lack of percipience.
Toynbee on Bertrand Russell. Both were useful idiots. The only exceptions I've found were Russell on the Belgian Congo, Russell's Vietnam War work, and Russell on Palestine.
• Jewish Talmudic theory makes a very logically consistent set of beliefs and commands. These include: instructions to kill any non-Jew investigating the Talmud; instructions to kill 'the best' of non-Jews; instructions to harm and defraud non-Jews when practicable; instructions to lie; and an annual ceremony to disavow any legal oath made to non-Jews. There are few serious non-Jewish students of the Talmud, no doubt as a consequence. One of the few is Michael Hoffman, in for example
Judaism's Strange Gods. (That link is to my review).
I've claimed the Talmud is ‘very logically consistent’, speaking as someone not very familiar with it, and who regards it as a nuisance and a menace. But very probably there are serious weaknesses. Examples:
[1] Jews seem to argue that, when something is over, it's no longer important: I've seen this argument used to deflect comments on Jew mass murder in the USSR. And of course there's some truth, especially in the long term. But it is a double-edged blade: if there is a move to genuinely exterminate Jews, the proponents can argue that, once it's over, it won't matter.
[2] Jews, or at least rabbis, say that goyim must be warned of some trick or fraud; then it becomes their fault if they don't see it. 9/11 for example was advertised in several ways. Is this a well-thought out policy? I'm not sure.
[3] Jews have a revenge, or pseudo-revenge, attitude. Dresden for example hosted an early conference on the Jewish menace; the Germans obtained the Ukraine's harvest during WW1; Hungary fought against the Jew Bela Kun after WW1; Sweden was neutral in WW2, supplying iron ore to Germany; and these places were all targeted for later Jewish hate. For that matter, Jews show no gratitude for British and US actions, despite nominally helping them. Are these things well-thought out?
[4] Jewish Talmudic theory explicitly looks forward to exterminating non-Jews, preferably
en masse. It's true this is kept secret when possible, though sometimes it leaks out—freakish bearded 'rabbis', absurd low-grade US 'academics', women with the brainpower of Sunday School teachers—but is it a workable policy?
• Since Jewish power can be inferred to be considerable, and since their school of ethics is extremely hostile to non-Jews, clearly Jews must be viewed as a power bloc, analogous to nations, but spread out across those nations, much as a parasite might spread threads and spores and umbilical cords where it can find nutrition. These will be hidden where possible, but the effect on genuine scientific historical interpretations ought to be enormous. Here are three of my files on Jews and their activities, which I put here for completeness:
- Guide for the Perplexed about Jews A Guide for the Perplexed: Cutting Through the Jungle of Jewish Influences on White Ideas. Includes a long list of words and phrases corrupted by Jews (just a few: Appeasement | Reform | Democracy | Socialism | Anarchism | Communism | Primitive Communism | Capitalism | Collectivism | Feudalism | Foreign Aid | Do Targets Always Fail? | Foreign Aid | Do Targets Always Fail? | Individualism | Free Thought | Slavery | 1960s | 'Concentration Camps' | 'Minorities'...) & Evolution of Jews as parasites | Identifying aggressive Jewish Plans and patterns & Jews and Learning IDENTIFYING AGGRESSIVE JEW PLANS AND PATTERNS & Economics | Politics | Sociology | History | Religion | Health & some videos.
- Articles on Jews going back to 2012. (Originally in British Resistance, a defunct website). About 60, including: Is Lipstadt a Covert Counter-Mossad Truther?—and Other Puzzles: Trump | US 'Education' | Race Wars | Thugs | Man-Made Races | Holocaustianity | Was Early Christianity Hijacked by Jews? | Jo Cox, Jews, Invasion, Housing | 'Migrant Crisis' | Flat Earth Promotion; Why? & 'Jew Shock' | New View of Suffragettes & Blaming Women | Understanding Money, Banks, Jews, and Varieties of Capitalism | Nuclear Scepticism and Revisionism | Jewish Murders & Mass Murders | Eugenics | Image Fakery, Event Fakery, Crisis Actors | How Jews Use Blacks | Jewish Liars, Trolls, Nudgers, Reputation Managers | Jews and Unions | Jews and Fake Information | Jews and Wars Considered as Jewish-Run Cock Fights | Jews 5: Jewish Hate for Whites
- Teaching about Jews Jewish influence as damaging to academic subjects
- Holocaust Revisionism, Free Speech, and Internet is one of my earliest articles, with material added later in sequence. It's known that Jews invented atrocities against the Germans, for various reasons including extorting money. But if Jews around the world controlled propaganda, then propaganda originating from Russian Jews may have its own purpose; for example, Bolshevik atrocities may have been invented to inflame Germans. And the 'pogrom' frauds were obviously used as a device to move to the USA, Britain, and othewr places.
Note on 'Jews': throughout I use the 'popular' sense of Jews as a self-identified group, including such aspects as supposed racial unity despite interbreeding, supposed maternal descent—which appears to be relatively new—and supposed 'chosen people' status. The further secret aspects—name-changing, deceit, Talmudic viciousness, destruction of beauty, health, achievements—and the selective application of laws in favour of Jews—appear still not to be widely known. In my view, these behaviours are largely genetic, resembling psychopaths, and mediated by written texts. So the attitudes are transmissible by the written and spoken word.
Notes on Hitler's Financial Policies [ Top of page ]
The Essential, Crucial Point Here is that Jews controlled finance in the UK and the USA, and no doubt elsewhere. The establishment and secret ownership of the Federal Reserve gave Jews unchallengeable financial control. The Federal Reserve was never audited. And wartime controls, including the removal of gold currency and establishment of paper, and installation of Jews such as Bernard Baruch, fixed the system. When people prattle about finances under Hitler, be aware that their claims are unchallengeable under the conditions then, and today. There was no difficulty in introducing depressions, booms, popular policies, unpopular policies, police authorities, political authorities, propagandists, thugs, and all the rest of it.
Prelude Around the Great War (later renamed First World War) [ Top of page ]
Below is an extract, on the aftermath of WW1, from H G Wells's The Outline of History, Popular Edition (Sept 1930)
Published by Cassell & Company (Jewish. London, Toronto, Melbourne and Sydney). I believe it was never translated into any other language.
I've selected Wells because of his popularity in the Anglophone world; his views must have been widespread.
Notes to bear in mind before looking through Wells (most important few notes bold):
• Wells had little idea of the importance to Jews of Russia. Such events as the Jewish-financed Japanese war on eastern Russia, the constant attacks and assassinations by Jews from the 'Pale', the propaganda by Jews in Britain and the USA, and the huge effort of the Jewish coup in Russia, is over-ridden by constant references to Germany and Europe. The centrality of Russia in Jewish intentions—a huge part of the next war—is never noted by Wells, as of course Jews wanted.
Arthur Greenwood, Amery &c were all crypto-Jews, wanting wars for Jewish gain. Challinor had no real understanding of that—or perhaps he kept it secret
• H G Wells never identified 'British' Jewish interests as likely to be alien to British interests. He never identifies the catastrophic costs to Britain in funding Jewish loans, or the deaths and destruction fomented by Jews. This is not entirely his fault: national accounts were primitive, and details of loans were as far as I know completely secret, no doubt deliberately. In 1914, Britain allegedly held about 40% of the world's total overseas investment, something the Jews would be well aware of; by 1940 Britain was bankrupt, presumably in the cash holdings sense, not ownership of lands and assets.
• His endless attention to European small states distracts him from Armenian genocide, Ukrainian genocide, mass USSR killings, Balfour (and Sykes & George Picot), and the changes to the Ottoman empire. All details of interest to Jews.
• Wells was almost completely Jew-naive, in common with most well-publicised 20th-century authors. But not completely; there are occasional glimmers, such as his comment on
'currency cranks'. (NB he was educated with the 'Jew' who I think became the newspaper political cartoonist nicknamed 'Low').
• Wells had no idea of the penetration of 'Jews' in the world's capitals, or the basic beliefs of 'Jews'. He had no idea that of the throngs attracted to Versailles, many of the 'experts' and translators were 'Jews'. Many of the supposed leaders were funded by Jews or crypto-Jews, whose concern was to increase their power in their own regions—areas outside Europe (think Ukraine, Armenia, Turkey) and within Europe (Poland, Hungary, Roumania, for example) not just the USA, France, Britain, and Russia. The borders drawn at Versailles were arranged under Jewish pressure, probably taking account of local Jewish 'communities' and planting seeds of future disruptions and wars.
• Wells, following 'Jew' propaganda, believed such things as
The world of the Western European civilizations in the years that followed the end of the Great War was like a man who has had some very vital surgical operation very roughly performed. There was widespread propaganda favouring war—not, of course, that 'Jews' would fight themselves. 'Healthy cleansing', 'the ancient Greeks were warlike', 'muscular Christianity' were common; so were such ideas as 'bored populations', 'restlessness' and so on—the evidence being 'Jewish' violence, Jew-supported groups (Irish and women and Boer War advocates, for example, and bomb-throwing 'anarchists' in and near Russia). It's obviously important for 'Jews' to spread the idea that wars can only be stopped by people controlled by 'Jews'.
• A century later, we can see some of the pieces of ignorance in Wells:
(1) He had little idea about paper money, and zero idea of the 'Fed'; all his life, up to about 50, currencies had been gold, silver, and copper, plus notes and cheques.
(2) He had no idea that the 'changes in mood' were products of 'Jewish' propaganda. For example, after the Balfour Declaration, which Wells doesn't mention, 'Jews' in the USA propagandised in the press, popular music, cinema, and other media, switching from neutrality/indifference to anti-Germanism in about 1916.
(3) He shares the naive view that wars are simple contests between geographical groups; he says nothing about equipment, supplies, and costs—and, especially, secret deals on repayments of loans.
(4) He accepts various scrappy 'Jew' errors and lies, such as revolutions propelled by revolutionary masses: his account of the 'Russian Revolution' is taken from 'Jew' sources. His use of 'imperialism' is another Judaism, copied and modified from Hobson: Wells never seems to have considered that the spread of useful new things isn't 'imperialism' in the hostile sense, or that finance is a separate issue from colonies and trade.
(5) Such phrases as 'The new Russian republic had to fight unsupported' show Wells had no idea of the capacities of Jews to transfer money, to use nepotistic networks, use telegraphic information, and control news.
• Many new things have come to light, for example President Wilson being blackmailed by Jews after his adultery. Wells seems never to have known that the November 11th 1918 armistice was a truce, but not an official end to the war. Kerensky later 'worked' in a US university. Jews were forced into the US Supreme Court. Stalin was a Jewish dictator, not a 'socialist'.
• Wells quotes from Keynes's
Economic Consequences of the Peace—though Keynes never mentioned Jewish funding, either through ignorance, or corruption.
England had destroyed, as in each preceding century, a trade rival; writes Keynes of Clemenceau; he must have meant Spain, Netherlands, France, and (recently) Germany and one can't help but wonder How Jewish was Keynes. (A 2013 piece plainly claims
Keynes was a Jewish liar). Wells also quotes from Emile Joseph Dillon's
Inside Story of the Peace Conference. Neither dealt with the start of the war. Wells unfortunately was not competent to summarise the financial repayment system, or summarise the damage that had been done. And Wells was fiercely against 'profiteering', just as Jews hated 'Kulaks', but was unaware he was backing profiteering on a new and unprecedented scale. It's a sad commentary on Wells's humanitarian outlook that the never faced issues such as small businesses, though (for example) one of his novels ends with the family man hero running a bike shop, painting bikes in the customers' choice of colour. But he seemed happy to extinguish small businesses when the supposed public interest insisted.
• The start of the war, and events such as starvation and weaponisation of food, were then, and still are, secret. Wells himself took part in shameless war propaganda: Joad later wrote something like
It is only my respect for a great man which prevents me from quoting some of the things Wells wrote during the war. This of course is a 'Jew' attitude: once they start a war they want it to continue. Germany being at fault was the leading idea. I'd suggest Jews in Russia wanted war, and got it, Germany being the
last 'great power' to mobilise.
• Note that
Wells makes no mention of Hitler—even as late as 1930. Hitler's supposed primacy of monstrousness came later, as 'Jews' shifted their propaganda focus. Mussolini was liked by many at the time, for example
Coudenhove-Kalergi, and
two Jewish monopolists, Counts Volpi and Pirelli, who between world wars are well-known figures in the City of London. Mussolini's Abyssinian adventure was, in part, financed by the Paris Rothschilds,and his Abyssinian expert was a Jew... The American Ambassador to Italy lauded Mussolini.
• Mein Kampf (my review) comments on Mussolini, and the intelligent review of his life by Miles Mathis, who also wrote on Lenin. Both were figureheads of Jews, one as an actor, the other as a money co-ordinator. The point of this piece is to point out that Hitler was very likely another actor and co-ordinator.
• Wells had no idea of three-way wars backed by Jews. (Listen to Tony Benn—another Jew puppet politician—in 1994 talking on 'fascism':
Its time we did a bit of reexamination ... of the 1930s and got away from the idea that the British government believed in appeasement. They didnt .. appease Hitler. They supported Hitler. They backed Hitler. .. captured German foreign office youll find that when Halifax went to talk to Hitler on behalf of the British government the first thing he did was to congratulate the German chancellor on having destroyed communism in Germany, and acted as a bulwark against it in Europe. And the whole of that 1930s period was a period when western governments were happy to use fascism in order to destroy socialism in all its forms, not just in Russia [sic]
but in the west as well. ... maximising deaths of Germans and Russians, by giving weapons to whichever side was losing. ...)
• Wells accepted the idea of Roman Catholic responsibility for the Second World War, in his Penguin-published book
Crux Ansata. This is a fairly popular half-truth, which flickers about. The Jesuits are a later post-1945 favourite. Jews, Catholics, and Islam are part of a
trinity of 'Jew' nonsense which it is essential to understand. But Wells never disentangled his ideas to consider Jews as a collectivity, or the relationships between Jews and Christians.
THE OUTLINE OF HISTORY -
{1084} the representative body, attempted arrests of liberal leaders, the formation of a provisional government under Prince Lvoff, and an abdication (March 15th) by the Tsar.
For a time it seemed that a moderate and controlled revolution might be possible—perhaps under a new Tsar. Then it became evident that the destruction of confidence in Russia had gone too far for any such adjustments. The Russian people were sick to death of the old order of things in Europe, of Tsars and of wars and great powers; it wanted relief, and that speedily, from unendurable miseries. The Allies had no understanding of Russian realities; their diplomatists were ignorant of Russian; genteel persons, with their attention directed to the Russian Court rather than Russia, they blundered steadily with the new situation. There was little goodwill among the diplomatists for republicanism, and a manifest disposition to embarrass the new government as much as possible. At the head of the Russian republican government was an eloquent and picturesque leader, Kerensky, who found himself assailed by the deep forces of a profounder revolutionary movement, the "social revolution," at home and cold-shouldered by the Allied governments abroad. His allies would neither let him give the Russian people land nor peace beyond their frontiers. The French and the British Press pestered their exhausted ally for a fresh offensive, but when presently the Germans made a strong attack by sea and land upon Riga, the British Admiralty quailed before the prospect of a Baltic expedition in relief.
The new Russian republic had to fight unsupported. In spite of their great naval predominance and the bitter protests of the English admiral, Lord Fisher (1841-1920), it is to be noted that the Allies, except for some submarine attacks, left the Germans the complete mastery of the Baltic throughout the war.
The Russian masses were resolute to end the war.
There had come into existence in Petrograd a body representing the workers and common soldiers, the Soviet, and this body clamoured for an international Conference of socialists at Stockholm. Food riots were occurring in Berlin at this time, war-weariness in Austria and Germany was profound, and there can be little doubt, in the light of subsequent events, that such a conference would have precipitated a reasonable peace on democratic lines in 1917 and a German revolution. [I emphasize this sentence to show how little grasp Wells had of top-down methods of control-RW].
Kerensky implored his Western allies to allow this conference to take place, but, fearful of a world-wide outbreak of socialism and republicanism, they refused, in spite of the {1085} favourable response of a small majority of the British Labour Party. Without either moral or physical help from the Allies, the "moderate" Russian republic still fought on and made a last desperate offensive effort in July. It failed after some preliminary successes and another great slaughtering of Russians.
The limit of Russian endurance was reached. Mutinies now broke out in the Russian armies, and particularly upon the northern front, and on November 7th, 1917, Kerensky's Government was overthrown and power was seized by the Soviet Government, dominated by the Bolshevik socialists under Lenin, and pledged to make peace regardless of the Western powers. Russia passed definitely "out of the war."
In the spring of 1917 there had been a costly and ineffective French attack upon the Champagne front, which had failed to break through and sustained enormous losses. Here, then, by the end of 1917, was a phase of events altogether favourable to Germany, had her government been fighting for security and well-being rather than for pride and victory. But to the very end, to the pitch of final exhaustion, the people of the Central Powers were held to the effort to achieve a complete victory.
To that end it was necessary that Britain should be not merely resisted, but subjugated, and in order to do that Germany had already dragged America into the circle of her enemies. Throughout 1916 the submarine campaign had been growing in intensity, but hitherto it had respected neutral shipping. In January, 1917, a completer "blockade" of Great Britain and France was proclaimed, and all neutral powers were warned to withdraw their shipping from the British seas. An indiscriminate sinking of the world's shipping began, which compelled the United States to enter the war in April (6th), 1917. Throughout 1917, while Russia was breaking up and becoming impotent, the American people were changing swiftly and steadily into a great military nation. And the unrestricted submarine campaign, for which the German imperialists had accepted the risk of this fresh antagonist, was far less successful than had been hoped. The British navy proved itself much more inventive and resourceful than the British army; there was a rapid development of anti-submarine devices under water, upon the surface, and in the air; and after a month or so of serious destruction, the tale of submarine sinkings declined. The British found it necessary to put themselves upon food rations; but the regulations were well framed and ably administered, the public showed an excellent spirit and intelligence, and the {1086} danger of famine and social disorder was kept at arm's length.
Yet the German imperial government continued to fight. If the submarine was not doing all that had been expected, and if the armies of America gathered like a thunder-cloud, yet Russia was definitely down; and in October the same sort of autumn offensive that had overthrown Serbia in 19l5 and Roumania in 1916 was now turned with crushing effect against Italy. The Italian front collapsed after the Battle of Caporetto {1087} and the Austro-German armies poured down into Venetia and came almost within gunfire of Venice. Germany felt justified, therefore, in taking a high line with the Russian peace proposals, and the peace of Brest-Litovsk (March 2nd, 1918) gave the Western Allies some intimation of what a German victory would mean to them. It was a crushing and exorbitant peace, dictated with the utmost arrogance of confident victors.
All through the winter German troops had been shifting {1088} from the Eastern to the Western front, and now, in the spring of 1918, the jaded enthusiasm of hungry, weary, and bleeding Germany was lashed up for the one supreme effort that was really and truly to end the war. For some months American troops had been in France, but the bulk of the American army was still across the Atlantic. It was high time for the final conclusive blow upon the Western front, if such a blow was ever to be delivered.
The first attack was upon the British in the Somme region. The not very brilliant cavalry generals who were still in command of a front upon which cavalry was a useless encumbrance, were caught napping; and on March 2lst, in "Gough's Disaster," the fifth British army was driven back in disorder almost to Amiens. The jealousies of the British and French generals had prevented any unified command of the Allied armies in France, and there was no general reserve whatever behind Gough. Nearly a thousand guns were lost by the Allies, and scores of thousands of prisoners. Throughout April and May the Germans rained offensives on the Allied front. They came near to a break through in the north, and they made a great drive back to the Marne, which they reached again on May 30th, 1918.
This was the climax of the German effort. Behind it was nothing but an exhausted homeland. Marshal Foch was put in supreme command of all the Allied armies. Fresh troops were hurrying from Britain across the Channel, and America was now pouring men into France by the hundred thousand. In June the weary Austrians made a last effort in Italy, and collapsed before an Italian counter-attack. Early in June Foch began to develop a counter-attack. By July the tide was turning, and the Germans were reeling back. The Battle of Chateau-Thierry (July 18th) proved the quality of the new American armies. In August the British opened a great and successful thrust, and the bulge of the German lines towards Amiens wilted and collapsed. "August 8th," says Ludendorf, "was a black day in the history of the German army." The British attack on the Hindenburg line in September ensured the Allied victory.
Germany had finished. The fighting spirit passed out of her army, and October was a story of defeat and retreat along the entire Western front. Early in November British troops were in Valenciennes and Americans in Sedan. In Italy also the Austrian armies were in a state of disorderly retreat. But everywhere now the Hohenzollern and Habsburg forces were {1089} collapsing. The smash at the end was amazingly swift. Frenchmen and Englishmen could not believe their newspapers as day after day they announced the capture of more hundreds of guns and more thousands of prisoners.
In September a great Allied offensive against Bulgaria had produced a revolution in that country and peace proposals. Turkey had followed with a capitulation at the end of October, and Austro-Hungary on November 3rd. There was an attempt to bring out the German fleet for the last fight, but the sailors mutinied (November 7th).
The Kaiser and the Crown Prince bolted hastily, and without a scrap of dignity, into Holland. On November l1th an armistice was signed and the war was at an end. . . .
For four years and a quarter the war had lasted, and gradually it had drawn nearly everyone, in the Western world at least, into its vortex. Upwards of eight millions of people had been actually killed through the fighting, another twenty or twenty-five millions had died through the hardships and disorders entailed. Scores of millions were suffering and enfeebled by under-nourishment and misery. A vast proportion of the living were now engaged in war work, in drilling and armament, in making munitions, in hospitals, in working as substitutes for men who had gone into the armies and the like. Business men had been adapting themselves to the more hectic methods necessary for profit in a world in a state of crisis. The war had become, indeed, an atmosphere, a habit of life, a new social order. Then suddenly it ended.
In London the armistice was proclaimed about 11 A.M. on November 11th. It produced a strange cessation of every ordinary routine. Clerks poured out of their Offices and would not return, assistants deserted their shops, omnibus drivers and the drivers of military lorries set out upon journeys of their own devising with picked-up loads of astounded and cheering passengers going nowhere in particular and careless whither they went. Vast vacant crowds presently choked the streets, and every house and shop that possessed such adornments hung out flags. When night came, many of the main streets, which had been kept in darkness for many months because of the air raids, were brightly lit. It was very strange to see thronging multitudes assembled in an artificial light again. Everyone felt aimless, with a kind of strained and aching relief. It was over at last. There would be no more killing in France, no more air raids—and things would get better.
People wanted to laugh, and weep—and could do neither. {1090}
Youths of spirit and young soldiers on leave formed thin processions that shoved their way through the general drift, and did their best to make a jollification. A captured German gun was hauled from the Mall, where a vast army of such trophies had been set out, into Trafalgar Square, and its carriage burnt. Squibs and crackers were thrown about. But there was little concerted rejoicing. Nearly everyone had lost too much and suffered too much to rejoice with any fervour. {1091}
CHAPTER 39 THE WORLD AFTER THE GREAT WAR
The world of the Western European civilizations in the years that followed the end of the Great War was like a man who has had some very vital surgical operation very roughly performed, and who is not yet sure whether he can now go on living or whether he has not been so profoundly shocked and injured that he will presently fall down and die. It was a world dazed and stunned. Militarist imperialism had been defeated, but at an overwhelming cost. It had come very near to victory. Everything went on, now that the strain of the conflict had ceased, rather laxly, rather weakly, and with a gusty and uncertain temper. There was a universal hunger for peace, a universal desire for the lost liberty and prosperity of pre-war times, without any power of will to achieve and secure these things.
In many respects there had been great deterioration. Just as with the Roman Republic under the long strain of the Punic Wars, so now there had been a great release of violence and cruelty, and a profound deterioration in financial and economic morality. Generous spirits had sacrificed themselves freely to the urgent demands of the war, but the sly and base of the {1092} worlds of business and money had watched the convulsive opportunities of the time and secured a firm grip upon the resources and political power of their countries. Everywhere, men who would have been regarded as shady adventurers before 1914 had acquired power and influence, while better men had toiled unprofitably. In the phase of post-war exhaustion it was difficult to restrain these newly rich and newly powerful men.
In the course of the war there had been extraordinary experiments in collective management in nearly all the belligerent countries. It had been realized that the common expedients of peace-time commerce, the higgling of the market, the holding out for a favourable bargain, was incompatible with the swift needs of warfare. Transport, fuel, food supply, and the distribution of the raw materials not only of clothing, housing and the like, but of everything needed for war munitions, had been brought under public control.
No longer had farmers been allowed to underfarm; cattle had been put upon deer-parks and grasslands ploughed up, with or without the owners' approval. Luxury building and speculative company promotion had been restrained. In effect, a sort of emergency socialist state had been established throughout most of belligerent Europe. It was rough-and-ready and wasteful, but it was more effective than the tangled incessant profit-seeking, the cornering and forestalling and incoherent productiveness of "private enterprise."
In the earliest years of the war there had also been in all the belligerent states a very widespread feeling of brotherhood and of the need for service in the common interest. The common men were everywhere sacrificing life and health for what they believed to be the common good of the State. In return, it was promised, there would be less social injustice after the war, a more universal devotion to the common welfare. In Great Britain, for instance, Mr. Lloyd George was particularly insistent upon his intention to make the after-war Britain "a land fit for heroes." He foreshadowed the continuation of this new war-socialism into the peace period in discourses of great fire and beauty.
In Great Britain there was created a Ministry of Reconstruction, which was understood to be planning a new and more generous social order, better labour conditions, better housing, extended education, a complete and scientific revision of the economic system. And the word "Reconstruction" coloured the lives and sustained the hopes of the distressed multitude {1093} everywhere. Similar promises of a better world sustained the common soldiers of France and Germany and Italy. It was premature disillusionment that caused the Russian collapse. So that two mutually dangerous streams of anticipation were running through the minds of men in Western Europe towards the end of the war. The rich and adventurous men, and particularly the new war profiteers, were making their plans to prevent such developments as, for example, that air transport should become a State property, and to snatch back manufactures, shipping, land transport, the trade in staples, and the public services generally, from the hands of the common weal into the grip of private profit—they were securing possession of newspapers and busying themselves with party caucuses and the like to that end; while, on the other hand, the masses of common men were looking forward naively to a new state of society planned almost entirely in their interest and according to generous general ideas. The history of 1919 is largely the clash of these two streams of anticipation. There was a hasty selling off, by the "business" government in control, of every remunerative public enterprise to private speculators. . . .
By the middle of 1919 the labour masses throughout the world were manifestly disappointed and in a thoroughly bad temper. The British "Ministry of Reconstruction" and its foreign equivalents were exposed as a soothing sham. The common man felt he had been cheated. There was to be no reconstruction, but only a restoration of the old order—in a bleaker form necessitated by the poverty of the new time.
For four years the drama of the war had obscured the social question which had been developing in the Western civilizations throughout the nineteenth Century. Now that the war was over, this question reappeared gaunt and bare, as it had never been seen before.
And the irritations and hardships and the general insecurity of the new time were exacerbated by a profound disturbance of currency and credit. Money, a complicated growth of conventions rather than a system of values, had been deprived within the belligerent countries of the Support of a gold Standard. Gold had been retained only for international trade, and every government had produced excessive quantities of paper money for domestic use. With the breaking down of the war-time barriers the international exchange became a wildly fluctuating confusion, a source of distress to everyone except a few gamblers and speculators. Prices rose and rose—with an infuriating effect upon the wage-earner. On the one hand was his employer {1094} resisting his demands for more pay; on the other hand, food, house-room, and clothing were being cornered against him. And—which was the essential danger of the situation—he began to lose whatever confidence he had ever possessed that patience or industrial willingness he displayed would really alleviate the shortages and inconveniences by which he suffered.
In most of the European countries there was an urgent need of houses. Throughout the war there had been a cessation not only of building but of repairs. The shortage of houses in the last months of 1919 amounted to between 250,000 and a million homes in Britain alone. Conditions in France and Germany were even worse. Multitudes of people were living in a state of exasperating congestion, and the most shameless profiteering in apartments and houses was going on. It was a difficult but not an impossible situation. Given the same enthusiasm and energy and self-sacrifice that had tided over the monstrous crisis of 1916, the far easier task of providing a million houses could have been performed in a year or so. But there had been corners in building materials, transport was in a disordered state, and it did not pay private enterprise to build houses at any rents within the means of the people who needed them. Private enterprise, therefore, so far from bothering about the public need of housing, did nothing but corner and speculate in rents and sub-letting. It now demanded grants in aid from the State—in order to build at a profit.
And as another example of the inadequacy of a profiteering system to solve the problems of the time, there was a great crowding and dislocation of goods at the depots because there was insufficient road transport. There was an urgent want of cheap automobiles to move about goods and workers. But private enterprise in the automobile industry imagined it would be far more profitable to produce splendid and costly cars for those whom the war had made rich. The munition factories built with ready money could have been converted very readily into factories for the mass production of cheap automobiles; but private enterprise had insisted upon these factories being sold by the State, and would neither meet the public need itself nor let the State do so.
So, too, with the world in the direst discomfort for need of shipping, private enterprise insisted upon the shutting down of the newly-constructed State shipyards.
Currency was dislocated everywhere, but private enterprise was busy buying and selling francs or marks and intensifying the trouble. {1095}
These are facts that the historian of mankind is obliged to note with as little comment as possible. Private enterprise in Europe in 1919 and 1920 displayed neither will nor capacity for meeting the urgent needs of the time. So soon as it was released from control, it ran naturally into speculation, cornering, l and luxury production. It followed the line of maximum profit. It displayed no sense of its own dangers; and it resisted any attempt to restrain and moderate its profits and make itself serviceable, even in its own interest.
And this went on in the face of the most striking manifestations of the extreme recalcitrance on the part of the European masses to the prolonged continuance of the privations and inconveniences they suffered. In 1913 these masses were living as they had lived since birth; they were habituated to the life they led. The masses of 1919, on the other band, had been uprooted everywhere, to go into the armies, to go into munition factories, and so on. They had lost their habits of acquiescence, and they were hardier and more capable of desperate action. Great multitudes of men had gone through such brutalizing training as, for instance, bayonet drill; they had learnt to be ferocious, and to think less either of killing or being killed. Social unrest had become, therefore, much more dangerous.
It was not that the masses had or imagined that they had the plan of a new social, political, and economic system. They had not, and they did not believe they had. The defects we have pointed out in the socialist scheme were no secret from them. It was a much more dangerous state of affairs than that. It was that they were becoming so disgusted with the current system, with its luxury, its waste, and its general misery, that they did not care what happened afterwards so long as they could destroy it. It was a return to a state of mind comparable to that which had rendered possible the debacle of the Roman Empire.
Everywhere in Europe the forces of social revolution began to stir, and most notably in Italy and Germany. Communism displayed exceptional aggressiveness in Italy. In various parts of Italy there appeared communist mayors, and in Bologna there was a forcible attempt to put communist principles into Operation. In July, 1920, Giolitti, a neutralist who had opposed the war, replaced Signor Nitti as head of the government. He made various experiments in co-partnership between the industrial workers and their employers. In September many steel works and other factories were seized by the workers, who began to operate them on socialist lines. These proceedings received the support and endorsement of the government. {1096}
The slide towards communism continued during 1921 in the face of a gathering opposition, and there was rioting and violence in Florence, Trieste, Puglia, Pisa and many other places. The socializing measures of Giolitti had produced a violent reaction among the classes interested in private property, and an organization of young men had grown up, the Fascisti, who affected shock heads, black shirts, nationalism of the intensest sort, and anti-socialism. They met violence with violence, they carried it to new extremes, they established an anti-socialist terror. They found a leader of great energy and slight scruples, Benito Mussolini, formerly a radical journalist. Under his skilful direction the Fascisti speedily outdistanced the sporadic and sentimental outrages of the communists. Liberal leaders and writers were waylaid and beaten with clubs. A favourite method of the Fascisti was the administration of over-doses of castor oil to those who criticized their proceedings unfavourably. Murder, beatings, torture, the burning of the private property of liberal thinkers, became the methods of social control in Italy. The shadow of communism was replaced by the reality of brigand rule.
By October, 1922, the Fascisti had grown to such strength that they constituted a veritable army and could march upon Rome. The Cabinet proclaimed martial law and prepared to fight, but the king refused his assent to these measures and invited Mussolini to take control of affairs. This he did. [I emphasize this sentence to show how little grasp Wells had of top-down methods of control-RW]. He became head of the government, and agreed to disband his blackshirts—a promise which was never kept. The Fascisti were put in control of the police and armed forces of the country, the freedom of the Press was destroyed, elections became a farce, political opponents continued to be assaulted, terrorized, murdered; and Mussolini, under the title of Il Duce, became virtual dictator, the king falling back into relative obscurity.
For a time a certain rough economic efficiency was restored to Italy, but to this day the social outlook of that great country remains dark and uncertain. The Italian situation remains profoundly interesting to all the world, because it manifests in the harshest and crudest forms the quality of the extreme left and the extreme right in contemporary human affairs, the impracticability and incapacity of the former and the readiness with which private ownership and enterprise, when put upon the defensive, can degenerate into violence and brigandage. Italy, like Russia, has become a jail for every free-minded person. The creeping disease of illegality, upon which we have already animadverted in our criticism of [Kipling's]
Stalky and Co., {1097} is in full flower in both these countries. But Italy does not stand alone in this matter; it is merely the most fully developed instance of a universal tendency of the times. In Germany, France and Great Britain Fascisti have found rivals and imitators, but so far their activities in these countries have amounted to a nuisance rather than a tyranny.
§2 President Wilson at Versailles.
We have noted the general social and economic disorder of the European communities in the years following the war, before giving any account of the work of world settlement that centred on the Peace Conference at Paris, because the worried and pre-occupied state of everyone concerned with private problems of income, prices, employment and the like goes far to explain the jaded atmosphere in which that Conference addressed itself to the vast task before it. One cannot expect a vigorous public life when individual lives are confused and distressed.
The story of the Conference turns very largely upon the adventure of one particular man, one of those men whom accident or personal quality picks out as a type to lighten the task of the historian. We have in the course of this history found it very helpful at times to focus our attention upon some individual—Buddha, Alexander the Great, Yuan Chwang, the Emperor Frederick II, Charles V, and Napoleon I, for example—and to let him by reflection illuminate the period in which he lived. The conclusion of the Great War can be seen most easily as the rise of the American president, President Wilson, to predominant importance in the world's hopes and attention, and his failure to justify that predominance.
President Wilson (1856-1924) had previously been a prominent student and teacher of constitutional law and the political sciences generally. He had held various professorial chairs, and had been President of Princeton University (New Jersey). There is a long list of books to his credit, and they show a mind rather exclusively directed to American history and American politics. He retired from academic life, and was elected Democratic Governor of New Jersey in 1910. In 1913 he became the Democratic presidential candidate, and as a consequence of a violent quarrel between ex-President Roosevelt and President Taft, which split the dominant Republican party, President of the United States.
The events of August, 1914, seem to have taken President {1098} Wilson, like the rest of his fellow-countrymen, by surprise. We find him cabling an offer of his Services as a mediator on August 3rd. Then, for a time, he and America watched the conflict. At first neither the American people nor their President seem to have had a very clear or profound understanding of that long-gathered catastrophe. Their tradition for a century had been to disregard the problems of the Old World, and it was not to be lightly changed. The imperialistic arrogance of the German Court and the alleged inclination of the German military authorities towards melodramatic "frightfulness," their invasion of Belgium, their use of poison gas, and the nuisance of their submarine campaign, created a deepening hostility to Germany in the United States as the war proceeded; but the tradition of political abstinence and the deep-rooted persuasion that America possessed a political morality altogether superior to European conflicts, restrained the President from active intervention. He adopted a lofty tone. He professed to be unable to judge the causes and justice of the Great War. It was largely his high pacific attitude that secured his re-election as President for a second term.
But the world is not to be mended by merely regarding evil-doers with an expression of rather undiscriminating disapproval. By the end of 1916 the Germans had been encouraged to believe that under no circumstances whatever would the United States fight, and in 1917 they began their unrestricted submarine warfare and the sinking of American ships without notice. President Wilson and the American people were dragged into the war by this supreme folly. And, also, they were dragged into a reluctant attempt to define their relation to Old-World politics in some other terms than those of mere aloofness. Their thoughts and temper changed very rapidly. They came into the war side by side with the Allies, but not in any pact with the Allies. They came into the war, in the name of their own modern civilization, to punish and end an intolerable political and military situation.
Slow and belated judgments are sometimes the best judgments. In a series of "notes," too long and various for detailed treatment in this Outline, thinking aloud, as it were, in the hearing of all mankind, President Wilson sought to state the essential differences of the American State from the Great Powers of the Old World. He unfolded a conception of international relationships that came like a gospel, like the hope of a better world, to the whole eastern hemisphere.
Secret agreements were to cease, "nations" were determine {1099} their own destinies, militarist aggression was to cease, the sea-ways were to be free to all mankind. These commonplaces of American thought, these secret desires of every sane man, came like a great light upon the darkness of anger and conflict in Europe. At last, men felt, the ranks of diplomacy were broken, the veils of Great Power "policy" were rent in twain. Here, with authority, with the strength of a powerful new nation behind it, was the desire of the common man throughout the world, plainly said.
Manifestly there was needed some overriding Instrument of government to establish world law and maintain these broad and liberal generalizations upon human intercourse. A number of schemes had floated in men's minds for the attainment of that end. In particular, there was a movement for some sort of world league, a "League of Nations." The American President adopted this phrase and sought to realize it. An essential condition of the peace he sought was he declared to be this federal organ. This League of Nations was to be the final court of appeal in international affairs. It was to be the substantial realization of the peace. Here, again, he awakened a tremendous echo.
President Wilson was for a time the spokesman of a new age. Throughout the war, and for some little time after it had ended, he held, so far as the Old World was concerned, that exalted position. But in America where they knew him better there were doubts. And, writing as we do now, with the wisdom of subsequent events, we can understand these doubts. America, throughout a century and more of detachment and security had developed new ideals and formul&ligea; of political thought, without realizing with any intensity that, under conditions of stress and danger, these ideals and formulas might have to be passionately sustained. To her community many things were platitudes that had to the Old-World communities, entangled still in ancient political complications, the quality of a saving gospel. President Wilson was responding to the thought and; conditions of his own people and his own country, based on a liberal tradition that had first found its full expression {1100} in English speech; but to Europe and Asia he seemed to be thinking and saying, for the first time in history, things hitherto undeveloped and altogether secret. And that misconception he may have shared.
We are dealing here with an able and successful professor of political science, who did not fully realize what he owed to his contemporaries and the literary and political atmosphere he had breathed throughout his life; and who passed very rapidly, after his re-election as President, from the mental attitudes of a political leader to those of a Messiah. His "notes" are a series of explorations of the elements of the world situation. When at last, in his address to Congress of January 8th, 1918, he produced his Fourteen Points as a definite statement of the American peace intentions, they were, as a statement, far better in their spirit than in their arrangement and matter.
This document demanded open agreements between nations and an end to secret diplomacy, free navigation of the high seas, free commerce, disarmament, and a number of political readjustments upon the lines of national independence. Finally, in the Fourteenth Point, it required "a general association of nations" to guarantee the peace of the world. He sought "peace without victory."
These Fourteen Points had an immense reception throughout the world. Here at last seemed a peace for reasonable men everywhere, as good and acceptable to honest and decent Germans and Russians as to honest and decent Frenchmen and Englishmen and Belgians; and for some months the whole world was lit by faith in Wilson. Could they have been made the basis of a world settlement in 1919, they would forthwith have opened a new and more hopeful era in human affairs.
But, as we must tell, they did not do that. There was about President Wilson a certain narrow egotism; there was in the generation of people in the United States to whom this great occasion came—a generation born in security, reared in plenty and, so far as history goes, in ignorance—a generation remote from the tragic issues that had made Europe grave—a certain superficiality and lightness of mind. [Wells doesn't know the USA, far from being innocent and independent, was under the thumb of Jew money-RW]
It was not that the American people were superficial by nature and necessity, but that they had never been deeply stirred by the idea of a human community larger than their own. It was an intellectual, but not a moral, conviction with them. One had on the one hand these new people of the New World, with their new ideas, their finer and better ideas, of peace and world righteousness, and on the other the old, bitter, deeply entangled peoples of the Great {1101} Power system; and the former were crude and rather childish in their immense inexperience, and the latter were seasoned and bitter and intricate.
The theme of this clash of the raw idealist youthfulness of a new age with the experienced ripeness of the old was treated years ago by that great novelist, Henry James, in a very typical story called Daisy Miller. It is the pathetic story of a frank, trustful, high-minded, but rather simple-minded American girl, with a real disposition towards righteousness and a great desire for a "good time," and how she came to Europe and was swiftly entangled and put in the wrong, and at last driven to welcome death by the complex tortuousness and obstinate limitations of the older world. There have been a thousand variants of that theme in real life, a thousand such transatlantic tragedies, and the story of President Wilson is one of them. But it is not to be supposed, because the new thing succumbs to the old infections, that is the final condemnation of the new thing.
Probably no fallible human being manifestly trying to do his best amidst overwhelming circumstances has been subjected to such minute, searching, and pitiless criticism as President Wilson. He is blamed for conducting the war and the ensuing peace negotiations on strictly party lines. He remained, it is charged against him, the President representing the American Democratic Party, when circumstances conspired to make him the representative of the general interests of mankind. He made no attempt to incorporate with himself such great American leaders as ex-President Roosevelt, ex-President Taft, and the like. He did not draw fully upon the moral and intellectual resources of the States; he made the whole issue too personal, and he surrounded himself with merely personal adherents. And a grave error was his decision to come to the Peace Conference himself. Nearly every experienced critic seems to be of opinion that he should have remained in America, in the role of America, speaking occasionally as if a nation spoke. Throughout the concluding years of the war he had, by that method, achieved an unexampled position in the world.
Says Doctor Dillon: [
The Peace Conference.] "Europe, when the President touched its shores, was as clay ready for the creative potter. Never before were the nations so eager to follow a Moses who would take them to the long-promised land where wars are prohibited and blockades unknown. And to their thinking he was that great leader. In France men bowed down before him with awe and affection. Labour leaders in Paris told me that they {1102} shed tears of joy in his presence, and that their comrades would go through fire and water to help him to realize his noble schemes. To the working classes in Italy his name was a heavenly clarion at the sound of which the earth would be renewed. The Germans regarded him and his humane doctrine as their sheet-anchor of safety. The fearless Herr Muehlon said: 'If President Wilson were to address the Germans, and pronounce a severe sentence upon them, they would accept it with resignation and without a murmur and set to work at once.' In German-Austria his fame was that of a saviour, and the mere mention of his name brought balm to the suffering and surcease of sorrow to the afflicted. ..."
Such was the overpowering expectation of the audience to which President Wilson prepared to show himself. He reached France on board the George Washington in December, 1918. He brought his wife with him. That seemed, no doubt, a perfectly natural and proper thing to an American mind. Quite a number of the American representatives brought their wives. Unhappily, a social quality, nay, almost a tourist quality, was introduced into the world settlement by these ladies. Transport facilities were limited, and most of them arrived in Europe with a radiant air of privilege. They came as if they came to a treat. They were, it was intimated, seeing Europe under exceptionally interesting circumstances. They would visit Chester, or Warwick, or Windsor, en route—for they might not have a chance of seeing these celebrated places again. Important interviews would be broken off to get in a visit to some "old historical mansion." This may seem a trivial matter to note in a History of Mankind, but it was such small human things as this that threw a miasma of futility over the Peace Conference of 1919. In a little while one discovered that Wilson, the Hope of Mankind, had vanished, and that all the illustrated fashion papers contained pictures of a delighted tourist and his wife, grouped smilingly with crowned heads and such-like enviable company. ... It is so easy to be wise after the event, and to perceive that be should not have come over. {1103}
The men he bad chiefly to deal with, for example M. Clemenceau (France), Mr. Lloyd George and Mr. Balfour (Britain), Baron Sonnino and Signor Orlando (Italy), were men of widely dissimilar historical traditions. But in one respect they resembled him and appealed to his sympathies. They, too, were party politicians, who had led their country through the war. Like himself they had failed to grasp the necessity of entrusting the work of settlement to more specially qualified men.
"They were the merest novices in international affairs. Geography, ethnology, psychology, and political history were sealed books to them. Like the Rector of Louvain University, who told Oliver Goldsmith that, as he had become the head of that institution without knowing Greek, he failed to see why it should be taught there, the chiefs of State, having obtained the highest position in their respective countries without more than an inkling of international affairs, were unable to realize the importance of mastering them or the impossibility of repairing the omission as they went along. . . [Dillon,
The Peace Conference.]
"What they lacked, however, might in some perceptible degree have been supplied by enlisting as their helpers men more happily endowed than themselves. But they deliberately chose mediocrities. It is a mark of genial spirits that they are well served, but the plenipotentiaries of the Conference were not characterized by it. Away in the background some of them had families or casual prompters to whose counsels they were wont to listen, but many of the adjoints who moved in the limelight of the world-stage were gritless and pithless.
"As the heads of the principal Governments implicitly claimed to be the authorized spokesmen of the human race, and endowed with unlimited powers, it is worth noting that this claim was boldly challenged by the people's organs in the Press. Nearly all the Journals read by the masses objected from the first to the dictatorship of the group of Premiers, Mr Wilson being excepted. . . ."
The restriction upon our space in this Outline will not allow {1104} us to tell here how the Peace Conference shrank from a Council of Ten to a Council of Four (Wilson, Clemenceau, Lloyd George and Orlando), and how it became a Conference less and less like a frank and open discussion of the future of mankind, and more and more like some old-fashioned diplomatic conspiracy. Great and wonderful had been the hopes that had gathered to Paris. "The Paris of the Conference," says Dr. Dillon, "ceased to be the capital of France. It became a vast cosmopolitan caravanserai teeming with unwonted aspects of life and turmoil, filled with curious samples of the races, tribes, and tongues of four continents who came to watch and wait for the mysterious to-morrow.
"An Arabian Nights' touch was imparted to the dissolving panorama by strange visitants from Tartary and Kurdistan, Corea and Azerbeijan, Armenia, Persia, and the Hedjaz—men with partriarchal beards and scimitar-shaped noses, and others from desert and oasis, from Samarkand and Bokhara. Turbans and fezes, sugar-loaf hats and head-gear resembling episcopal mitres, old military uniforms devised for the embryonic armies of new states on the eve of perpetual peace, snowy-white burnouses, flowing mantles, and graceful garments like the Roman toga, contributed to create an atmosphere of dreamy unreality in the city where the grimmest of realities were being faced and coped with.
"Then came the men of wealth, of intellect, of industrial enterprise, [Note: Wells does not notice Jews in his international throngs-RW] and the seed-bearers of the ethical new ordering, members of economic committees from the United States, Britain, Italy, Poland, Russia, India, and Japan, representatives of naphtha industries and far-off coal mines, pilgrims, fanatics and charlatans from all climes, priests of all religions, preachers of every doctrine, who mingled with princes, field-marshals, statesmen, anarchists, builders-up and pullers-down. All of them burned with desire to be near to the crucible in which the political and social systems of the world were to be melted and recast.
"Every day, in my walks, in my apartment, or at restaunts, I met emissaries from lands and peoples whose very names had seldom been heard of before in the West. A delegation from the Pont-Euxine Greeks called on me, and discoursed of the ancient cities of Trebizond, Samsoun, Tripoli, Kerassund, in which I resided many years ago, and informed me that they, too, desired to become welded into an independent Greek Republic, and had come to have their claims allowed. The Albanians were represented by my old friend Turkhan Pasha {1105} on the one hand, and by my friend Essad Pasha on the other—the former desirous of Italy's protection, the latter demanding complete independence. Chinamen, Japanese, Coreans, Hindus, Kirghizes, Lesghiens, Circassians, Mingrelians, Buryats, Malays, and Negroes and Negroids from Africa and America were among the tribes and tongues forgathered in Paris to watch the rebuilding of the political world system and to see where they 'came in.' . . ."
To this thronging, amazing Paris, agape for a new world, came President Wilson, and found its gathering forces dominated by a personality narrower, in every way more limited and beyond comparison more forcible than himself: the French Premier, M. Clemenceau. At the instance of President Wilson, M. Clemenceau was elected President of the Conference. "It was," said President Wilson, "a special tribute to the sufferings and sacrifices of France." And that, unhappily, sounded the keynote of the Conference, whose sole business should have been with the future of mankind.
Georges Benjamin Clemenceau was an old journalist politician, a great denouncer of abuses, a great upsetter of governments, a doctor who had, while a municipal councillor, kept a free clinic, and a fierce, experienced duellist. None of his duels ended fatally, but he faced them with great intrepidity. He had passed from the medical school to republican journalism in the days of the Empire. In those days he was an extremist of the Left. He was for a time a teacher in America, and he married, and was afterwards divorced from, an American wife. He was thirty in the eventful year 1871. He returned to France after Sedan, and flung himself into the stormy politics of the defeated nation with great fire and vigour. Thereafter, France was his world, the France of vigorous journalism, high-spirited personal quarrels, challenges, confrontations, scenes, dramatic effects, and witticisms at any cost. He was what people call "fierce stuff," he was nicknamed the "Tiger," and he seems to have been rather proud of his nickname. Professional patriot rather than statesman and thinker, this was the man whom the war had flung up to misrepresent the fine mind and the generous spirit of France.
His limitations had a profound effect upon the Conference, which was further coloured by the dramatic resort, for the purpose of signature, to the very Hall of Mirrors at Versailles in which Germany had triumphed and proclaimed her unity. There the Germans were to sign.
To M. Clemenceau and to France, in that atmosphere, the {1106} war ceased to seem a world war; it was merely the sequel of the previous conflict of the Terrible Year, the downfall and punishment of offending Germany. "The world had to be made safe for democracy," said President Wilson. That from M. Clemenceau's expressed point of view was "talking like Jesus Christ." The world had to be made safe for Paris. "Talking like Jesus Christ" seemed a very ridiculous thing to many of those brilliant rather than sound diplomatists and politicians who made the year 1919 supreme in the history of human insufficiency.
(Another flash of the "Tiger's" wit, it may be noted, was that President Wilson with his Fourteen Points was "worse" than God Almighty. "Le bon Dieu" only had ten. . . .)
M. Clemenceau sat with Signor Orlando in the more central chairs of a semicircle of four in front of the fire, says Keynes. He wore a black frockcoat and grey suede gloves, which he never removed during these sessions. He was, it is to be noted, the only one of these four reconstructors of the world who could understand and speak both French and English.
The aims of M. Clemenceau were simple and in a manner attainable. He wanted all the settlement of 1871 undone. He wanted Germany punished as though she was a uniquely sinful nation and France a sinless martyr land. He wanted Germany so crippled and devasted [sic] as never more to be able to stand up to France. He wanted to hurt and humiliated Germany more than France had been hurt and humiliated in 1871. He did not care if in breaking Germany Europe was broken; his mind did not go far enough beyond the Rhine to understand that possibility. He accepted President Wilson's League of Nations as an excellent proposal if it would guarantee the security of France whatever she did, but he preferred a binding alliance of the United States and England to maintain, uphold, and glorify France under practically any circumstances. He wanted wider opportunities for the exploitation of Syria, North Africa, and so forth by Parisian financial groups.
He wanted indemnities to recuperate France, loans, gifts, and tributes to France, glory and homage to France. France had suffered, and France had to be rewarded. Belgium, Russia, Serbia, Poland, Armenia, Britain, Germany, and Austria had all suffered, too; all mankind had suffered, but what would you? That was not his affair. These were the supers of a drama in which France was for him the star. ... In much the same spirit Signor Orlando seems to have sought the welfare of Italy.
Mr. Lloyd George brought to the Council of Four the subtlety of a Welshman, the intricacy of a European, and an urgent {1107} necessity for respecting the nationalist egotism of the British imperialists and capitalists who had returned him to power. Into the secrecy of that council went President Wilson with the very noblest aims for his newly discovered American world-policy, his rather hastily compiled Fourteen Points, and a project rather than a scheme for a League of Nations.
"There can seldom have been a statesman of the first rank more incompetent than the President in the agilities of the Council Chamber." [Keynes.] From the whispering darknesses and fireside disputes of that council, and after various comings and goings we cannot here describe, he emerged at last with his Fourteen Points pitifully torn and dishevelled, but with a little puling infant of a League of Nations, which could die or which might live and grow—no one could tell. But that much, at least, he had saved. . . .
§3
Constitution of the League of Nations.
This homunculus in a bottle which it was hoped might become at last Man ruling the Earth, this League of Nations as it was embodied in the Covenant of April 28th, 1919, was not a League of Peoples at all; it was, the world discovered, a league of "states, dominions, or colonies." It was stipulated that these should be "fully self-governing," but there was no definition whatever of this phrase. There was no bar to a limited franchise and no provision for any direct control by the people of any state. India figured—presumably as a "fully self-governing state"! An autocracy would no doubt have been admissible as a "fully self-governing" democracy with a franchise limited to one person. The League of the Covenant of 1919 was, in fact, a league of "representatives" of foreign Offices, and it did not even supersede embassies at every capital.
The British Empire appeared once as a whole, and then India (!) and the four dominions of Canada, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand appeared as separate sovereign states. Later, Ireland attained a separate status. The Indian representative was, of course, sure to be merely a British nominee; the dominion representatives would be colonial politicians. But if the British Empire was to be thus dissected, a representative of Great Britain should have been substituted for the imperial representative, and Egypt should also have been given representation. Moreover, either New York State or {1108} Virginia was historically and legally as much a sovereign state as New Zealand or Canada. The inclusion of India raised logical claims for French Africa and French Asia. One French representative did propose a separate vote for the little principality of Monaco.
There was to be an assembly of the League in which every member state was to be represented and to have equal voice, but the working directorate of the League was to vest in the Council, which was to consist of the representatives of the United States, Britain, France, Italy, and Japan, with four other members elected by the Assembly. The Council was to meet once a year; the gatherings of the Assembly were to be at "stated intervals," not stated.
Except in certain specified instances the league of this Covenant could make only unanimous decisions. One dissentient on the council could bar any proposal—on the lines of the old Polish liberum veto. This was a quite disastrous provision. To many minds it made the Covenant League rather less desirable than no league at all. It was a complete recognition of the unalienable sovereignty of states, and a repudiation of the idea of an overriding commonweal of mankind. This provision practically barred the way to all amendments to the league constitution in future except by the clumsy expedient of a simultaneous withdrawal of the majority of member states desiring a change, to form the league again on new lines. The Covenant made inevitable such a final winding-up of the league it created, and that was perhaps the best thing about it.
The following powers, it was proposed, should be excluded from the original league: Germany, Austria, Russia, and whatever remains there were of the Turkish Empire. But any of these might subsequently be included with the assent of two-thirds of the Assembly. The original membership of the league as specified in the projected Covenant was: the United States of America, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, the British Empire (Canada, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, and India), China, Cuba, Ecuador, France, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, the Hedjas, Honduras, Italy, Japan, Liberia, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Roumania, the Serb-Croat-Slovene State, Siam, Czecho-Slovakia and Uruguay. To which were to be added by invitation the following powers which had been neutral in the war: the Argentine Republic, Chile, Colombia, Denmark, Holland, Norway, Paraguay, Persia, Salvador, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and Venezuela.
Such being the constitution of the league, it is scarcely to {1109} be wondered at that its powers were special and limited. It was given a seat at Geneva and a secretariat. It had no powers even to inspect the military preparations of its constituent states, or to instruct a military and naval staff to plan out the armed co-operation needed to keep the peace of the world.
The French representative in the League of Nations Commission, M. Leon Bourgeois, insisted lucidly and repeatedly on the logical necessity of such powers. As a Speaker he was rather copious and lacking in "spice" of the Clemenceau quality. The final scene in the plenary Session of April 28th, before the adoption of the Covenant, is described compactly by Mr. Wilson Harris: the crowded Banqueting Hall at the Quai d'Orsay, with its "E" of tables for the delegates, with secretaries and officials lining the walls, and a solid mass of journalists at the lower end of the room. "At the head of the room the 'Big Three' diverted themselves in undertones at the expense of the worthy M. Bourgeois, now launched, with the help of what must have been an entirely superfluous sheaf of notes, on the fifth rendering of his speech in support of his famous amendments."
They were so often "diverting themselves in undertones," those three men whom God had mocked with the most tremendous opportunity in history. Keynes gives other instances of the levities, vulgarities, disregards, inattentions and inadequacies of these meetings.
This poor Covenant, arrived at in this fashion, returned with President Wilson to America, and there it met all the resentful Opposition of the republican party and all the antagonism of the men who had been left out of the European excursion. The Senate refused to ratify the Covenant, and the first meeting of the League Council was held, therefore, without American representatives.
The close of 1919 and the opening months of 1920 saw a very curious change come over American feeling after the pro-French and pro-British enthusiasms of the war period. The peace negotiations reminded the Americans, in a confused and very irritating way, of their profound differences in international outlook from any European power, that the war had for a time helped them to forget. They felt they had been "rushed" into many things without due consideration. They experienced a violent revulsion towards that policy of isolation that had broken down in 1917. The close of 1919 saw a phase, a very understandable phase, of passionate and even violent "Americanism," in which European imperialism and European socialism ... etc
Truth Clues: Equipment, Constructions, Agreements, Records... [ Top of page ]
My point here is to apply scepticism to hardware, equipment, and generally things which appeal more to novelists and diarists than to official 'historians'.
Obviously, superior equipment must be the source of many victories, and this obvious point is likely to be underplayed by the participants. Thus, in the Vietnam 'War', the grunts were supported by huge transport ships, trucks, helicopters, bombs, guns, chemical warfare equipment, radios and other things such as buildings, preserved food, uniforms, boots. When they set out for a rape expedition, it was still called 'fighting' by the Jewish media. It seems to be a permanent feature, at least while the media remains Jewish; recently I noticed a Facebook clip showing Michael Caine and another actor, probably a Jew, trying to impress young Americans with talk of 'fighting in two world wars' and other stuff.
However, I'm talking here of probable tricks, something like booby-traps planted in the structure of wars. Just some examples:–
'Lindybeige' is the nickname of a commentator on war equipment, including such things as slings in ancient fighting and ambuscades and siege engines and tanks and 'muzzle brakes'. And on e.g. Stirling engines and the 'public school' he attended Bryanston with its military-style structure of specified activities for all 24 hours.
One of his videos shows him in Switzerland, assessing four Second World War standard rifles. One of these was a Mauser; Lindybeige was puzzled by its gunsight, which had a v-shape nick in an opaque horizontal. He complained that if a target ducked down, he wasn't visible any longer. I suspect this was a deliberate anti-German design flaw. I recommend Lindybeige, who incidentally is innocent of any trace of revisionism: he thinks country A vs country B is a straightforward contest. But there's still scope for criticism: see for example his video on Napoleon. He is Nikolas Lloyd. Unfortunately he seems to be a Jew, I'd guess from Russia, and made a video expressing horror at the Holohoax; I presume he's just another Jew liar with no gratitude to the dead dupes of the world. So be cautious. His videos are on Youtube. I expect the hawk-nosed Wotshit will allow his site to survive.
On hardware, the really expensive stuff would seem to make a good target for creative design flaws, which we'd expect to be Jewish. The scope is tremendous: weak points for sinkability, badly-designed decks, and what-have-you. Research into equipment could be a target: consider the waste on fake nuclear weapons. I've seen it suggested (by Adrian Chetwynd) that cruise missiles and the alleged precursors, V-1 'buzz bombs', did not work. The Enigma coding machines had weaknesses.
On constructions, such things as the 'Maginot line' seem deliberately useless. 'Tank traps' by seashores maybe wouldn't work.
Preliminaries must have been designed to gives causes for war. The 'Versailles Treaty' was swung onto Germans in a sort of coup, obviously not a genuine Treaty. The 'free City of Danzig', a port with a corridor to Germany for its German population, the mixed states of Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia, the reparations, the permeable border between Germany and Poland, the carefully-arranged fake support by Britain for Poland, were no doubt planned as future flashpoints.
My Working Theory of the Two World Wars [ Top of page ]
Modern Communications. Left to right: 1869 metal telegraph 1901 underwater cables
2014 rail links including human traffic 2015 Airlines including human traffic 2018 optical cables Foot, horse, road, ship, rail, signals, semaphore etc not shown. This is the technology; messages, secrecy, codes, diplomacy etc not shown. Venice etc had efficient diplomatic services. So did the Rothschilds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Briefly: Jews by 1913 had gained control of US money. Jews had secret control of all the industrialised countries: USA, Germany, Britain, France. They also had significant control in Russia, eastern Europe, Turkey, China, India, South Africa, and Arabia. Telegraphic and wireless communications were fairly new and unprecedented (though far less efficient than today's). They had subordinates who were reliable and utterly subservient, such as Freemasons. In any country, they could organise disruptions and nuisance, under cover of their media control; the assassination of the Archduke was preceded by large numbers of atrocities in Russia, but also England and Ireland.
Jewish instincts and training must have impelled them to want two principal things: (1) Large-scale deaths of non-Jews; (2) Increases in financial power.
I suggest the First World War was contrived to cause massive deaths in Europe, combined with establishing new countries in eastern Europe, in place of their very unclear vague areas; in this way, local Jews in each new country could organise political chiefs and control of banking and industry. The Treaty of Versailles did this, drawing borders under the pretext of rights of small nations. Jews at the Treaty had sufficient local knowledge to insert many problematic points in the new borders, as future flashpoints; Danzig being an obvious example. [Danzig corridor that had been part of Germany for over 500 years until the area was put under Polish government rule in 1919 due to the Versailles Treaty"]
... 1918 Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, imposed on defeated, revolution-torn Russia by the German-led Central Powers. The draconian treaty tore away a quarter of Russia's population and industry, and vast swathes of Russian-ruled territory: Poland, the Baltic States, Belarus, Ukraine, Crimea, Bessarabia and Finland. Like Hitler, Stalin was determined to regain lost territories. This he largely did from 1920-1939. The 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was the final act in the restoration of the old Russian Tsarist Empire.
Arabia spilt into mandates after ottoman empire collapsed. Probably it was Jews taking advantage of the chaos of the Ottoman Empire. At Versailles, Europe was intentionally set up with fault lines everywhere - Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Danzig corridor, boundaries drawn where they shouldn't have been, bits of Germany removed, south Ireland set up to be taken over by hispanic Jews etc.
Jews Albright and Clark had NATO bomb Serbia so IMF Jews could make loans for rebuilding and get control of Serbian iridium assets… while Saudi non-profit n.g.o.s kept the KLA terrorists well fed and well armed… Just like ISIS in Syria… their Zionist bedfellows on Wall Street want Ukraine for GMO grain crops, that is why Monsanto (now Bayer), Genentec, ADM, etc., are wanting to buy land with the help of the Jews at the IMF, by giving these Ukrainian "Dill" idiots debt relief.
The fake 'Russian Revolution'—controlled by Jews; stories were made up pretending there had been a 'Revolution'—meant takeover of Russia and its territories. Other parts of the world (German Empire, Ottoman Empire) were taken over.
The Second World War aimed to destroy more non-Jews, principally in the vast territories of eastern Europe and Germany and Poland. China was subverted by Jews; India had the Bengal famine. The USA took the leading role in forcing war on Japan, damaging Chinese nationalism, and (probably) funding Hitler and his Jewish henchmen. Control of information was essential: Russia was flooded with Jewish propaganda; any protests against Jews were met with death. The BBC was completely subservient to Jews. The US media were completely subservient too. Depressions in many parts of the world were generated by Jews calling in loans, so money could be directed to Jews in Russia under Stalin. Gold taken from Russians and Americans added more. War was fanned by Jewish actions, such as border atrocities from Poland against Germany. Poland was given absurd assurances, which we never intended to be taken seriously. Germans were enraged, as Hitler's peace offers were continually turned down; eventually Germans were put in a mood to fight, despite the chances of victory being zero—Germany was too small. Jewish skill was to propagandise the USA and Britain against Germany, until most Americans and most Britons were convinced Germany was war-mongering, fanatical, dangerous. And most Germans were told Britain and the US were unreasonable, ignorant, controlled by Jews such as Churchill and Roosevelt. Jews controlled, or had spies, in the intelligence services, and controlled the industries and finance in the weapon-producing countries. So they controlled factories and production, and knew pretty much every important plan. All they had to do was maximise deaths and build up debts, hide information about mass murders and genocides in Russia, take over assets such as the British Empire, the French Empire, and German patents. The war was necessary to hide Jewish mass murders. It was necessary to kill anyone who might have had information about Jewish mass murders. The 'Cold War' was invented to direct money to Jews, waste vast sums on weapons frauds, and prevent investigations of their destruction of Slavs and others across the northern parts of Russia.
Note on the British Empire [ Top of page ]
Most people forget now that the British Empire ever existed. Obviously, the Jews controlling the war wanted assets which were British to be Jewish; the USA was the obvious owner. The rest of the Empire was a matter of indifference, and if race problems and race poverty were offloaded onto Europe, Jews loved it. Very obvious and of course Churchill knew it.
To make the point, here's the German swing band
Charlie and His Orchestra performing their version of Bye, Bye Blackbird (1941?):
 : Here's Mr Churchill's latest song, dedicated to Great Britain–
I never cared for you before
Hong Kong, Burma, Singapore
Bye, bye, Empire
India I may lose too
Then I'll only have the London Zoo
Bye, bye, Empire
There's no one here who loves and understands me
Nothing but heaps of bad news they all hand me
The Yankees are still out of sight
I can't make out wrong from right
Empire, bye bye.
NB Note how worldwide Jewish attitude is ignored. Churchill of course wanted 'bad news' of deaths etc provided Jews benefited
Jews in Berlin Before WW2 [ Top of page ]
Here's a link (this site) to
an article (I think) by Sarah Gordon. It consists of statements on Jews in Berlin between the wars; there were very many. Her list does not include spies, police, et al.
There's a comment added at the end, to the effect that Hitler swept all this away, but of course the possibility of Jews reforming, hiding, moving to Freemasonry, becoming even more crypto, seems far more feasible and likely.
Poverty and Call-ups: Mike Walsh on depression before WW2 [ Top of page ]
Extract from Mike Walsh's book
For Those Who Cannot Speak - the Criminal Futility of War. [Walsh doesn't consider the Jewish overview as a belligerent power]
... if you’re drafted you are shafted. Of the 16 million American servicemen conscripted into military service during World War Two less than 1/30 (600,000) volunteered. The majority of those who did so jumped before they were pushed. They were smart enough to know that by volunteering they would be better rewarded than those waiting for the ominous envelope to arrive. A volunteer had some choice as to what service branch he served in; conscripts had little or no choice.
Not all rookies were enthusiastic. At the onset of America’s entry into World War Two draftees discovered that bed-wetting earned them an honourable discharge. An unfortunate choice of words, but that is how it was. After this ruse was discovered the incidence of bed-wetting shot up by 1,200 per cent in one Texas training camp alone. It was only stopped when the US War Department issued a circular removing it as a ‘psycho-neurotic discharge.’
The U.S. economy suffered more hours lost through desertion than it did through industrial strikes. During the American Depression the number of unemployed in the United States reached eleven million. With no social security available an alternative life in the services offered three hearty meals a day, comradeship, a clean bunk with shower facilities, new clothes and shoes with no rent to pay. There would be career opportunities, sport, travel, free laundry and $21 a month (a lot of money then). It gets better as there would be no fighting to do. President F D Roosevelt had pledged to the electorate, “We shall not send your sons abroad.”
Similar social deprivation existed in Britain. Millions of bread-winners were unemployed and also unable to feed their families. There was no such thing as social security or benefits as we know them today. There was the government’s means test. This meant you had to sell your furniture, even your bed before the state would offer a few coins.
Obliged to go cap in hand to a state relief office the soul-destroying humiliation of wending one’s way through the interrogative vetting procedure was such that few took that course for the few shillings it might provide if successful.
Men in such distressing circumstances were dependent upon family support. Many turned their hand to whatever task they could whilst others begged on the streets.
We often see veterans parade. Respect not their fighting for their country but for their fighting for their daily bread. Respect that many of these old men wore uniform not to fight German infamies but the infamies of their corrupt political elite who profit from war.
Speculative Note on Douglas Bader [ Top of page ] Manufactured heroes of various types emerge along with the more spectacular thugs; Stakhanov may have helped the USSR, as with Stalin; the Lourdes people no doubt helped Roman Catholicism, along with a few Popes.
Watching Eamonn Andrews in This is Your Life March 1982, on the Jew-owned site Youtube, with its obviously unanswered questions, led me to wonder if Douglas Bader was a crypto-Jew, anxious to get bombings increased and money wasted; losing his legs seems to have been a cover for his being shot by his own side; he loved the war and recommended several more or less suicidal styles of fighter and bomb manoeuvres. Incidentally Adolf Galland was supposed to have been a well-known rival; ask yourself how much behind the scenes arrangement would be needed. I'd guess both were crypto-Jews, supported by bits of information, for example Bader's name and early life in Hampstead.
He may have been backed by the fictional character of Biggles; many British pilots were killed as they committed war crimes in Germany, perhaps influenced by the Biggles character's brainless and expensive adventures..
[Douglas Bader on This is Your Life, TV, March 1982. Video Aug 2019]
Andy Pay - 1 year ago
Unfortunately Reach for the Sky was total balls. My grandfather worked with Bader and did not have a good thing to say about him, apart from he was a total self serving bastard. Bader was shot down not had a collision as he claimed and was portrayed in the film, Galland confirmed that he was shot down. Bader lost his legs doing a low roll at 50 feet totally against all regulations that he continually broke. He wrote off two Spitfires through bad flying, over claimed victories immensely claiming 3 on one day alone, his total score was 4. His role in the Battle of Britain was minor apart from pissing everyone else off with his theory of the big wing which naturally would have benefitted him. As a POW he was detested by fellow inmates.
[Note: Jewish banks love destruction. It leads to government borrowing from Jewish banks. So Jews get repayments over many years. They require payments for the debts of the losers too. Clear proof Jews form their own power group, not aligned with either side.
lordmick roach - 1 year ago (edited)
I had the misfortune of meeting this man twice. He was rude and arrogant, he had no thought for anyone else. He was the cause of many young pilots dying because of his attitude. The Cranwell system of the 20`s and 30`s ensured that he did not get the court martial he deserved for disobeying an order and writing off an aircraft. There is strong evidence that he was actually shot down by one of his own, to protect others just as bad sea captains disappear at night. ...
sockington1 - 3 weeks ago
read books, do research, and most importantly, don't watch fictional propaganda films about this horrible piece of work
supernumery - 2 days ago
"after I saw the film "Reach for the Sky". I'm sure that film did indeed offer you inspiration but both the film and the book were utter nonsense. The REAL Bader was a thoroughly unpleasant man who was abusive and unkind to his subordinates. He was driven by arrogance and was NO hero. Even Kenny More who played him in the film disliked him.
In the fifties he was allowed to flutter around in a Spitfire and was known to suddenly drop into air bases to 'inspect' even though he was no longer in the RAF. He would fly in and inspect the men every so often telling an oik that his cap-badge wasn't straight or his tunic wasn't buttoned up. ...
David Hertzberg - 1 day ago
@supernumery Many years ago I worked for a company that had shared Shell's office in the city. It was before my time but many people remembered Bader and all of them said he was incredibly rude and arrogant and thoroughly unpleasant. He apparently would walk across the road without stopping and swear in front of women which at that time was unacceptable.
The people who told me this were city insurance workers and not left wing agitators. He lost his legs showing off aerobatting too near the ground. His big wing was a tactical disaster. The French family who sheltered him during he ridiculous escape attempt died in a concentration camp for helping him. ,,,
LordMick Roach - 2 years ago (edited)
Really? He was a pompous, rude and extremely arrogant man. He caused many, many of our pilots to die through his poor leadership and was disliked by most of his peers. Adolph Malan could not stand being in the same room! He was the root cause why Dowding was sacked and Keith Park was removed... Hero nothing, just a nasty and insubordinate officer who should have been court martialed for disobeying a direct order and writing off what was then, a very expensive aircraft
...
@Tim Fouraker Yea, by the time he was 25, he had disobeyed a direct order, written off an expensive Government aircraft and lost his legs, what a fucking great achievement, I met him a few times, did you? And, by the time I was 25, I had been wounded in action, had been taught to fly by the RAF and was married...What did you do laddie?
...
@Tim Fouraker Oh dear, you believe what Paul Brickhill wrote rather than the truth. Example, he had a batman in Colditz who was to have been repatriated in 44, Bader would not allow it because he wanted a servant, the poor man had to stay in Colditz for another year because of the pompous, selfish and arrogant Bader. Like it was Bader who championed the fighter sweeps into France which had no tactical value apart from getting young pilots dead. This man is used at Staff college as an example of bad leadership and management. So tell me again, when did you wear a uniform?
scott šzabo - 1 year ago (edited)
after shot down and captured, Adolf Galland personally responded to Bader's needs, to include cigars and cognac..had the guards and commandant to treat him with respect. even had the RAF drop a replacement prosthetic leg for him
Rs500ybd - 2 weeks ago
just a note to the haters . Have you ever been in combat ? ever had someone who is much like you in life try to take your life without knowing the real reasons why . the only reason we went to war was to stop the takedown of the Zionist empire . The sole and only Reason . So everyone whom fought or took part in this was Brainwashed . Things have changed now and we know the truth of it all . but you can not disrespect what they did to protect this island if they was alive today they would all don there spitfires and attack London target westminster . because they did not fight for this shit today . Respect to them all .
Hitler's Policy on German Population [ Top of page ]
A good article on historyreviewed.best draws attention to Hitler's policy on housing—cheap housing correlates with white fertility, and since Hitler's election in 1933 his policy was at some point to cease mortgage payments if a couple had four children. Or something similar. And of course this sounds correct; similarly, Jew-promoted immigration to white countries is accompanied by huge funding, to ensue that an alien population is introduced.
  My point here is that Russia had a huge population; in addition to Jew massacres, if Germans and Russians could be made to fight, more Germans would put up a bigger fight. Note that 1933 to 1941 is only 8 years, and 1933 to 1945 only 12. But 1918 to 1941 is 23 years. So it must have been more important for people more than (say) 10. Hitler's policy was too late.
The Age of Manufactured Dictators Begins [ Top of page ]
Lenin and [date] Stalin might be seen as isolated jews, pursuing aggressively parasitic jewish policies
Probably the reason for pushing 'supermen' as per Nietzsche, G B Shaw and others - distracting from jewish policies of infiltration
Mussolini - Hitler - early film animated voyage to the moon shows acting style https://www.bitchute.com/video/fsHUVqNwtDMS/
Italy: other example Gabriel d'Annunzio
Belgium: 'Belgium' was a manufactured country. Léon Degrelle 1906-1994 'Catholic Rexist Party'. Some film online; his oratory typically was vague and omitted WW1 Flanders deaths. Included references to something great, death, and to the degradation of mere material goods. He doesn't seem to have mentioned Jews. And he lived in luxury in Spain.
[I just watched a video on MyWhiteShow on Degrelle; I have to say he looks like yet another Jew phoney, full of BS: 'Courage makes a man powerful, rather than vulnerable. Death can be intimidated, but it must be looked right in the face.' He volunteered to fight with the Germans in Russia, but his accounts call 'communists' the enemy, i.e. presumably more-or-less ordinary Russians, under pitiliess Jews. MyWhiteShow hasn't understood that the action was controlled by Jews, wanting whites to kill each other expensively.]
Degrelle reminds me of another theme which may have been promoted for social manipulation: self-sacrifice and puritanism. Cromwell knew that the re-introduction of Jews would mean impoverishment in 18th-century England. So why not suggest Puritanism, which would fit in with theft of Roman Catholic church gold and other valuables?
The philosopher Schopenhauer (1788-1860) is a good example of puritanism-signalling: Nor is the doctrine [of coming as nearly as possible to non-existence] sincere, if we may judge by Schopenhauer's life. He habitually dined well, at a good restaurant; he had many trivial love-affairs, which were sensual but not passionate; he was exceedingly quarrelsome and unusually avaricious. ... It is hard to find in his life evidences of any virtue except kindness to animals ... In all other respects he was completely selfish. It is difficult to believe that a man who was profoundly convinced of the virtue of asceticism and resignation would never have made any attempt to embody his convictions in his practice.
[Note on the Xhosa in Africa, 1856-1857: movement supposedly started by a fifteen year old Xhosa girl named Nongqawuse. Though her mouthpiece appears to have been her uncle Mhlakaza, who may have been influenced by Christianity, according to Peires, presumably a Jew, writing after 2000. Various sections of the Xhosa people of the Eastern Cape and the Transkei slaughtered almost all their enormous stocks of cattle and deliberately killed their crops. Not all Xhosa did this, but their food was taken. Christian superstitions of resurrection and purification supposedly involved. Perhaps a labour recruitment policy? Cf cargo cults in which pale mimics of ports (or, later, airstrips) were staffed by shirted and capped men with clipboards, or wooden 'radios', waiting for ship or air loads of goodies to materialise. Possibly invented supermen were a white equivalent.]
How Most People Still See the Second World War [ Top of page ]
[ Poles | Catholics | Internet comments | Hilaire Belloc | Montgomery | David Irving | Russians | Dennis Wise | 'Peter' & 'Angelicus' on stupid Americans | Bertrand Russell | Jan Lamprecht | Several online sources | R C Sherriff | Miles Mathis ]
Typical online comment, still quite a common Jewish-influenced type. ...“The English knew that Hitler's word meant nothing. And the Nazi's [sic] were monsters. The Nazis used force and terror to take everything they wanted. Than they rounded up free innocent people not just in Germany but everywhere they invaded. The only reason Germany would've asked to peace was time, to build their armed forces stronger. And one day conquer England.”
... Online comment, which recognizes that one side of WW2 was Jews in clumps around the world power. But assumes Hitler was not part of that side. ...“WW2 ... We were on the Jewish side, instead of the correct side”—Jan Lamprecht, on psychological warfare, with Alfred Schaeffer. (NB Jan Lamprecht invented the phrase 'Jew shock')
... ‘Massa' Tobias’, 13 April 2018, Youtube comment All in all, nazism was the most perfect ZOG in all of history.: ... You know a good way of knowing who's a jewish agent? See who's behind their finances, who funds them.
Both Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht and Walther Funk, Hitler's financial ministers credited to Germany's "economic miracle" during Hitler's years, were Jews. "Cohencidentally", neither of them were executed or even jailed during the Nuremberg trials and got away free.
Just as with the soviet union, a disproportionately large number of high-ranking nazis were jewish or half jewish. Couple that with several strategic blunders, almost too convenient to be true, who decided the outcome of the war and it's a pretty clear case of an orchestrated war.
The ultimate goal, just like in ww1 was to kill whites and take over their homelands. And what better way than to prop up controlled opposition so you can draft all the jew-aware people and have them die in war?
And never mind the so called persecution of jews, these few were all low rank patsies that the zionist elite was more than happy to sacrifice if it meant solidifying their narrative. All in all, nazism was the most perfect ZOG in all of history. When jew aware people were clever enough to avoid deception, the jews just created another attractive net to catch them, and that was nazism-fascism.
Changes are needed to mental habits about wars. Most people have been trained to assume war is all about Group A vs Group B, perhaps with a bit of umpiring, fought if possible economically, and fast, so as to spare needless suffering. Jewish ambitions are different.
Hitler, rather obviously, reigns in Jewish-swayed countries, as the supreme enemy and hate figure. As far as I can tell, the main Internet-era revisionist was Dr Paul Reznowski, described as of Polish-Ukrainian descent; an online reference gives 1999 as the date of his claim that almost all the top 'Nazis' were part-Jews. Reznowksi seems to have been boosted by Roman Catholics, who seem unwilling to face the Jewish origins of Roman Catholics.
Below are a few samples of traditional views of WW2, including Montgomery 'of Alamein', David Irving, various Russians, and The Greatest Story Never Told, which adhere unthinkingly to this model of the Second World War, personalised as nations:–
Hilaire Belloc: Who wrote 100 years ago on The Jews. He was a nationalist, opposing the Jew attitude that Jews ought to be able to select any host. All his life he was pro-war, on the Roman Catholic side. He hated the Germans for the 'Great War' on France. But he had no real feeling for the idea that Jews, behind the scenes, were a huge influence on starting wars, although he noted the wealth of these few and very wealthy Jews has been scandalously increased through the [First World] war.
Montgomery: ... in Dec 1941 ... Hitler declared war on the USA. ... His motive in thus pitting Germany against the two most powerful states in the world simultaneously is unfathomable.—Montgomery can't understand there's another party; it simply doesn't occur to him there are not just two sides. Probably the declaration of war was to permit the USA or at least (((USA))) to invade Europe. Later, the USA would invade much as it chose, but at that time this may not have been the case.
David Irving: Some people argue that Hitler, against the advice of his chiefs of staff, let the British get away, out of magnanimity. David Irving doesn't consider that, at Dunkirk, there was another party. He advertised, for a time, a book by John Wear, on Germany's War vs USSR. Again, it presumably does not mention the real enemy.
David Irving 20 April 2018 [on 'Barbarossa' in 'Hitler's War':] Today is the 129th anniversary of the birth of the man who thwarted the gigantic military offensive against Western Europe planned by Josef Stalin and the “Jewish-Bolshevik” Moscow leadership, with seven new armies raised in secret, which was scheduled to begin on July 15, 1941. Raised in secret? Obviously the Jews running the USSR, and Jews in the USA and UK and Germany, elsewhere, must have known the figures for equipment. The likeliest guess is that ordinary Russians and Germans, plus assorted allies, were intended to kill each other and destroy Germany with rape, murder, pillage, and occupation.
Russian veterans: The Germans fought better, much better than our [i.e. Russian and others] soldiers. Moreover—we've managed to win that war only by human flesh! quoted (German writer, under Jewish censorship) as though war was Germans vs Russians, with no other input. It strikes me that Jews must have been needed as censors, since non-Jews would not have been aware of collusion between Jews across normal nations.
The Greatest Story Never Told has of course much detail on war between Germany and the USSR, so far as it's known—but the whole presentation omits the fact that the enemy of both was Jews, not Russians.
'Peter' online in 2015 In two world wars the United States twice invaded Germany, a country thousands of miles away from it that had never done anything to the United States. In two World Wars Britain and France declared war on Germany precipitating a world war. After the war they chopped Germany and Austria up, taking lands with millions of Germans living there and awarding it to new countries they created, all in an effort to weaken Germany, a country they were jealous of and hated. After the war and before WW II, Germany was continuously invaded, had territory taken from it by Poland, Lithuania and other countries as the allies looked on and did nothing. ... Peter doesn't mention—in this passage— that (((America))), (((Britain))), (((France))), and (((Poland))) were heavily influenced by Jews and their local collaborators.
'Angelicus' online in December 1, 2020 gives the German view (but accepts Hitler at face value) I wonder, what the Hell are you doing here? "A seriously flawed man and movement"? Really? What have you Americans done? I mean, apart of creating a disgusting and vulgar "culture" based on making money and rabid consumerism; the so-called "American Dream".
Let me spell it out for you, my brainless "friend". We (and by that, I mean ALL white men in the world) are in this horrendous mess because of you self-righteous American morons, who went wholeheartedly to war to destroy Germany and Western civilization in your pathetic "crusade" as that German-hating bastard and murderer Eisenhower called it. Without your colossal industrial might, the bloody Soviet Union would have been destroyed. But, of course, what else could you have done? You gave away the control of your country to the Jews well over a hundred years ago; after all, spiritually you are cousins if not brothers. Your disgusting ancestors, the so-called "Pilgrim Fathers" were the product of the most pro-Jewish of all Protestant sects, the Puritans. Their greed and materialism, together with the idea of belonging to "a chosen people" made them sympathize with their mentors and future associates.
That is why the Jews conquered so quickly such a considerable position within the American "high society". Your degenerate WASP upper class never saw anything wrong in associating herself with the Jews, that is why by the end of the XIX century together with the Vanderbilts, the Rockefellers, the Morgans, and the Carnegies, were the Belmonts, the Kahns, the Lehmanns, the Schiffs, etc., etc., etc. The only thing that mattered to the average American was (and is) "the almighty dollar".
You and the like of you have the colossal cheek, sorry, "chutzpah" to criticize and even insult Adolf Hitler, the man who unmasked the enemy of Mankind, gave him battle and defeated him on the political arena in 1933, carrying out the greatest political and social revolution in European history without firing a shot! His legacy was a new, fair order for the German people and, eventually for the White race, While you Americans were drowning in the Great Depression and being screwed by the big banks, Hitler turned Germany upside down and within 4 years he made her one of the wealthiest, most prosperous countries on Earth, and let's not even began to talk about the cultural and spiritual regeneration of the German people under his leadership, while you, ignorant and gullible Americans were welcoming with open arms all those hateful Marxist Jews from the "School of Frankfurt" who filled your universities and perverted your children and grandchildren.
You had a great man who warned you, his name was Henry Ford, but you ignored him. The same happened with an intellectual giant as Revilo Oliver. You talk about your "historical exemplars of virtue. courage, defiance and piety". Where are they? What did they do for you? Nothing! You have always been a greedy and evil WASP-Jewish corporation, poisoning the world with your "culture" via Hollywood (sorry, Holy-Jew). Your so-called popular culture is Jewish to the core. Let's take for example "God Bless America" and "White Christmas", written by the Jew Irving Berlin (real name Israel Beilin). Who is the quintessential "American" composer? George Gershwin! You don’t have a leg to stand on. I am sorry for the thousands of decent White Americans who are fully aware of the disgusting role their country has played as the bodyguard of international Jewry since the 1930s. They are the ones who are not afraid or ashamed of praising Adolf Hitler. Regarding the likes of you, and that means the majority of White Americans, you fully deserve what is coming to you via Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. You reap what you sowed.
Moscow May 2018, under Putin. What about the tens of millions killed by Jews in and outside the USSR? No great patriotic victory celebration for them!
Bertrand Russell (aged nearly 90):
.. the lives of movements ... form part of personal experience .. to facilitate estimates of probable success or failure. Communism, in spite of a very difficult beginning, [hugely funded by Jewish money taken from goyim—RW]
has hitherto continued to increase in power and influence. Nazism, on the contrary, by snatching too early and too ruthlessly at dominion, came to grief... Russell reminds me of people unable to work out the reasons for unvoted mass immigration and for neocon wars, now.
Jan Lamprecht's site
History Reviewed has online channels, and has for years. There are recent accounts of blacks collecting in mobs and looting, throwing stones, threatening to burn houses. The author laboriously describes this and calls it a 'race war', meaning presumably whites vs blacks. In fact he's aware that African blacks are used by Jews as thugs and thieves and murderers as deliberate policy. It's similar to Chicago, where parts have no franchise shops. It's therefore whites vs blacks vs Jews, but
History Reviewed after years of investigation, seems unable to notice.
“There were two great winners of the Second World War—the USA, and Russia” said Jan Lamprecht in an online talk. In fact of course the Jews were the great winner. How could anyone could think Russians, ruined by the war and GULags, poverty-stricken after thirty years of Jew exploitation, were 'great victors'?
Online website If Hitler's accomplishments were all Deep State approved and staged, that means WW II was totally unnecessary! It was unnecessary, between USSR and Germany. BUT Jews thought it was necessary, to kill off European whites whites and get more control.
West Point video on mistakes Hitler made (Germany vs Russia) ... There are many youtubes by third-rate academic types, treating wars as though only the apparent principals were involved. It's amusing to see them trying to be great generals, oblivious of the big picture. Or at least amusing in a way, until the full realisation of damage being done to whites—and others—by the ignorant censorship of these 'teachers'.
Online comment on supplies December 2016:
America has, for over a century, been a treacherous anti European country controlled by the jews. In WW1 the USA supplied the Central Powers with vast quantities of essential supplies so that the USA could bleed GB, France and Russia to death with War Loans. Austria was supplied through Spain. ... [800K deaths acc Bowden]
An online Jewish source says
World War 2 was fought by three hard men, Germans, Russians, and Anglo-Americans, as though it's an unquestionable fact. Note that the crucial roles of Jews are not mentioned.
Films I found a website (US Jewish, of course) which actually assessed
Saving Private Ryan,
The Great Escape and
Patton as the three best US films on WW2.
Journey's End by R C Sherriff was a popular, or at least heavily-advertised, stage play and film about the Great War, of infinite vulgarity and silliness, dating from 1928, by a writer of farces. It showed Germans vs Britons, and nobody else. Nothing on equipment, war aims, loans, etc.
Miles W Mathis (added 20 May 2021).
Miles Mathis' piece entitled Stockholm.pdf nominally on the COVID fraud and Stockholm Syndrome is
here (on this site for https reasons).
I was quite shocked by it, because it omits an important possibility about 'Stockholm Syndrome', and because of his astonishing misreading of Americans in the Second World War.
(1. Upper pane.) On 'Stockholm Syndrome', the whole episode was a media fraud, as Mathis himself demonstrated for example here. But the idea of the fraud was to promote the idea of submission to captors. There have been many Jewish 'psychology' experiments to claim goy unreasonableness.
But Mathis fails to recognise that captives may be convinced that their captors have a good case. A good example is US troops captured in Korea and Vietnam, having first-hand experience of war crimes against the local people. They were described as 'brainwashed' by Jewish 'journalists'.
(2. Lower pane.) On COVID, the psychological pressure was nowhere near that of the Second World War, which involved a long period of propaganda preparation, false flags, money control, economic depression, followed by years of war, including significant deaths, living in tents, boredom, conditioning to violence, damage to families, and committing of war crimes. Mathis says 'people's trust in the media went UP'—but all that shows is that they were fools without knowing it.
The modern view, given new information on Rothschilds and other Jews funding all sides of wars, with secret agreements on repayments, and their near-monopoly of international intelligence (about equipment, assets, populations, and raw materials of countries), and secret organisations with locals in every country, makes the old view, typically as shown in rather infantile Jewish movies, dangerously incomplete and outdated.
• This piece shifts the entire focus of the wars making up the Second World War to Jews vs the rest.
'Judaism'. Roman, Orthodox, & Protestant Christianity: And Islam [ Top of page ]
Poverty as Moslem Policy; ultimately this is Jewish:‘The usual policy of the Sultans was clearly sketched by Alau‑d‑din, who required his advisers to draw up "rules and regulations for grinding down the Hindus, and for depriving them of that wealth and property which fosters disaffection and rebellion." Half of the gross produce of the soil was collected by the government; native rulers had taken one-sixth. "No Hindu," says a Moslem historian, "could hold up his head, and in their houses no sign of gold or silver ... or of any superfluity was to be seen. .. Blows, confinement in the stocks, imprisonment and chains, were all employed to enforce payment." When one of his own advisers protested against this policy, Alau‑d‑din answered: "Oh, Doctor, thou art a learned man, but thou hast no experience; I am an unlettered man, but I have a great deal.
Be assured, then, that the Hindus will never become submissive and obedient till they are reduced to poverty. I have therefore given orders that just sufficient shall be left to them from year to year of corn, milk and curds, but that they shall not be allowed to accumulate hoards and property.’ (From SMITH, V. A.:
Oxford History of India. Oxford, 1923).
'Judaism' seems to be unique in its pathology—most so-called 'Jews' seem to be serious in their self-deception, and effortless straight-faced lying to non-Jews.
Religions were remoulded by 'Jews' for their own purposes, making up scripts foisted on non-Jews. Important examples are Christians, Moslems, Jesuits and Quakers.
During the 19th century, religions seemed to be on the defensive; most Victorians were unimpressed by Catholicism and Protestantism and viewed them as something for the simpler classes, or something ignored by the simpler classes, or as a career, or as social control. But informed criticism of Jews was almost non-existent. By 2000, Jewish money-printing had wiped out all pretence of moral standing to churches: Roman Catholics supported atrocities in Vietnam, Protestant churches supported mass murder in Europe, Russian Orthodoxy had been deleted by Jews.
The relevance here is the persistent idea that the Second World War was Christian vs Communist, or more accurately Christian vs Jew (since 'Communism' was and is Jewish).
The Greatest Story Never Told presents this view. Michael A Hoffman II emphasises usury as a sin, and I think regards WW2 as partly caused by interest on money being nominally removed. H G Wells wrote a whole 'Penguin Special' during WW2 on
Roman Catholicism.
All I'm saying here is
- The Catholic Church was far more scrappy, unlawful, uncreative, greedy, and disconnected, than modern propagandists say; and
- must have had alliances with Jews; and
- Jews changed allies or invented new allies (according to their own "moral" standards), for example supporting Islam, and in modern times backing both sides in wars—notably WW1 and WW2.
I'll quote here from Hallam's Middle Ages (?1848 1st edition).
CHAPTER VII History of Ecclesiastical [=Church] Power During the Middle Ages
At the irruption of the northern invaders into the Roman empire they found the clergy already endowed with extensive possessions. Beside the spontaneous oblations upon which the ministers of the Christian church had originally subsisted, they had obtained, even under the pagan emperors, by concealment or connivance—for the Roman law did not permit a tenure of lands in mortmain—certain immovable estates, the revenues of which were applicable to their own maintenance and that of the poor. These indeed were precarious and liable to confiscation in times of persecution. But it was among the first effects of the conversion of Constantine to give not only a security, but a legal sanction, to the territorial acquisitions of the church. The edict of Milan, in 313, recognises the actual estates of ecclesiastical corporations. Another, published in 321, grants all the subjects of the empire the power of bequeathing their property to the church.
...
The ... conquering nations ... retained the elementary principles ... of all barbarous idolatry, a superstitious reverence for the priesthood, a credulity that seemed to invite imposture, and a confidence in the efficacy of gifts to expiate offences. Many of the peculiar and prominent characteristics in the faith and discipline of those ages appear to have been either introduced or sedulously promoted for the purposes of sordid fraud. To those purposes conspired the veneration for relics, the worship of images, the idolatry of saints and martyrs, the religious inviolability of sanctuaries, the consecration of cemeteries, but, above all, the doctrine of purgatory and masses for the relief of the dead. A creed thus contrived ... naturally caused a torrent of opulence to pour in upon the church. Donations of land were continually made to the bishops, and, ... to the monastic foundations.
...
... The canonical penances imposed upon repentant offenders, extravagantly severe in themselves, were commuted for money or for immovable possessions—a fertile though scandalous source of monastic wealth, which the popes afterwards diverted into their own coffers by the usage of dispensations and indulgences. The church lands enjoyed an immunity from taxes, though not in general from military service, when of a feudal tenure. But their tenure was frequently in what was called frankalmoign, without any obligation of service. Hence it became a customary fraud of lay proprietors to grant estates to the church, which they received again by way of fief or lease, exempted from public burthens. And ... the monks prostituted their knowledge of writing to the purpose of forging charters in their own favour, which might easily impose on an ignorant age, since it has required a peculiar science to detect them in modern times. ...
...
As an additional source of revenue, and in imitation of the Jewish law, the payment of tithes was recommended or enjoined. These, however, were not applicable at first to the maintenance of a resident clergy. Parochial divisions, as they now exist, did not take place, at least in some countries, till several centuries after the establishment of Christianity. ...
... The ecclesiastical history of the middle ages presents one long contention of fraud against robbery; of acquisitions made by the church ... and torn from her by lawless power. ... In the tenth and eleventh centuries nothing was more common than to see the revenues of benefices in the hands of lay improprietors, who employed curates at the cheapest rate; an abuse that has never ceased in the church.
CHAPTER II PART II Of the Feudal System in France
... The history of the royal revenue in France is ... too important to be slightly passed over. As the necessities of government increased, partly through the love of magnificence and pageantry introduced by the crusades and the temper of chivalry, partly in consequence of employing hired troops instead of the feudal militia, it became impossible to defray its expenses by the ordinary means. Several devices, therefore, were tried, in order to replenish the exchequer. One of these was by extorting money from the Jews. It is almost incredible to what a length this was carried. Usury, forbidden by law and superstition to Christians, was confined to this industrious and covetous people. ... The children of Israel grew rich in despite of insult and oppression, and retaliated upon their Christian debtors. If an historian of Philip Augustus may be believed, they possessed almost one-half of Paris. Unquestionably they must have had support both at the court and in the halls of justice. ... till new schemes of finance supplying the turn, they were finally expelled under Charles VI., ... [Charles VI ruled 1380-1422. Note the extreme vagueness of what was permitted of Jews]
...
All this is difficult to judge: How was 'usury' defined, and did it include seizure of all assets on failure to repay? What liberties were allowed to Jewish 'tax farmers'? Are Papal bulls (in Church Latin) written clearly? Were cathedrals funded by Jews (as in a remark to Hilaire Belloc)? Were the mass killings in northern England ('the harrying of the north') after William the Bastard a Jewish policy? How much torture did Christians, and Jews, carry out on their heretics?
Christian churches take up or took up vast territories, with widely different organisations. I don't want to take a view related to WW2, beyond pointing out that simple statements may well be wrong. And these statements include comments about Hitler.
Many western churches had Jew links. London had two Jewish areas. York Minster is next to Jewbury. Lincoln Cathedral is near 'The Jew's House'. Durham Cathedral is near Clifford's Tower.
Bryce (1903) says '.. the prelates of Hungary still hold vast possessions' and mentions France, Spain, Catholic parts of Germany; but only as a visual assessment, without detail on income, cost, value. | A critical problem is the intellectual nullity of Catholicism, in for example promoting wars along with peace. It is dependent on primitive myths and miracles | Eastern (or 'Greek') Orthodox Church is organized with the Four Patriarchs of Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople, and Jerusalem. | Orthodox churches include Bulgaria, Serbia, Poland; the largest is or was Russian Orthodox, though it is not native to Russia. | The dallying with dictators is shared by Jews and Catholics.
'Mother Teresa' is one example. Here's another:
2018 Fr Fidelis Mukonori SJ ... emphasise[d] that a reasonable handover of power had taken place [in Zimbabwe]. A companion of the president from the early days of ZANU PF, Mukonori testified to Mugabe’s regular saying of the Rosary while on the campaign trail. Mukonori was also a member of the Catholic Justice and Peace Commission that investigated the terrible crimes of the 5th Brigade in Matabeleland in 1983, bloodshed which Mugabe had clearly instigated. But this did not deter him from remaining Mugabe’s confessor through all the intervening years. ... |
Reviews of books on the 'Abrahamic religions' | Faked scriptures:
Religions invented by 'Jews'—remember Moslems holding open the gates for European invasions. By all means ally with Arabs, Egyptians, Palestinians, Libyans—but think carefully before involvement with Jew-controlled groups of states.
Arabs and Spain [ Top of page ]
Here's an email comment [reply to C J Bjerknes mid 2020]
Kurtis Price
1 month ago
The Third Reich was not pro-Arab in the slightest. They had Arab allied soldiers recruited by the Waffen SS but that doesn't mean Hitler was "pro Arab" in the slightest. The British, however, were pro Arab and sought diplomacy with the Arab nations. And, so the the Zionists chose to collaborate with the Nazis to destroy British Imperialism in North Africa and the Middle East. The Betar Zionist supremacists led by Jabotinsky, wore the same uniforms as Hitler's beefstake [sic] Brownshirts. So you are WRONG!
Point owed to Brandon Martinez (of alt-right.com and reconquista europe): Since the invention of Moslems by Jews, in something like 700 AD, and the Moslem invasions of Spain, with Jews opening city gates to Moorish invaders, Spaniards consider Arabs to be a long-term enemy. The Spaniards are not pro-Palestinian or pro-Jew. Arabs are invading Spain at present, in 2021.
NB Europeans usually assume their countries were Christian, but Spain presumably might have become Islamic. My best guess is the Jews controlled Spain, and decided to go for a Christian country, deciding c. 1492 that Christians were a better bet.
Second World War Revisionism (so far) [ Top of page ]
Note on Jews in world history—Here are some examples, for people still unaware of the heavily-censored truth. Jews were/are involved in: Middle East and Europe: the movements to subvert Greece, Rome, and the Arab world ended with the Jewish freak religions of Christianity and Islam. Jews were involved in the USA (founders were Freemasons; 1812 war over Jewish finance in England; Jew slave ships from Africa. Jews are, now, influencing Canada (e.g. Trudeaus heavily involved with Jew anti-white immigration into Canada. India was affected e.g. by the East India Company. The opium wars against China were Jewish. Jews had, and have, influence in Britain; for example the 'Bank of England' since the 1660s. The Netherlands had a similar pattern to Britain, but earlier. In Spain, Jews 'held open the gates' to Muslim invasion; more recently, the 'Spanish Civil War' was Jews and their puppets vs Spaniards). In France, Jews carried out the 'French Revolution', and used Napoleon against Russia in anti-Tsarist actions; European Russia was heavily Jewish, and of course Jews mainly from the USA ran the 1917 Jewish coup in 1917, pretending to be 'Communist', using the ubiquitous Jewish media control. Japan's war against Russia in the 1900s was Jew-funded; 40 years later, Jews took the USA to war against Japan. key (Jewish cult of 'Islam' later weakened by Jewish moves to weaken Turkey's empire)/ Poland (huge populations of Jews there, pursuing their own habits)/ Italy (secret Jew preoccupations, including Venice and banking)/ Germany and Austria (endless Jewish tampering, both before unifications and after)/ Hungary (Bela Kun being a perfect example of Jew aggression)/ South Africa (Boer War; more recently anti-white aggression)/ Other parts of Africa; for example, Idi Amin in Uganda was Jew-aware.
Secret Jewish networking to push pet projects—and weak opposition—are part of our world.
Those examples are just of Jewish actors; in practice there were
secret local collaborators, both from inferior and jealous groups, and from superior and dominating hierarchies. Freemasons are the best-known examples, but Jesuits, Quakers, and others are old examples from the lower orders; 'Common Purpose' and AIPAC are new variants aimed to combat dominant hierarchies.
New Hypotheses on Jews and the World Wars are mostly concerned with secret agreements. These involve financial deals with governments; and legal deals, such as treaties and organisations, the details generally kept obscure; and networks of Jews internationally, plus local collaborators, e.g. Freemasons. And of course it's necessary to have subordinates: lawyers, media people, administrators, politicians, police and security people.
My working model here is that, by the 1930s, the USA was subordinate to Jews, some of the evidence being that the people of the USA could do nothing about the Depression, and that Jews ran the Fed and owned sufficient of the media to propagandise endlessly however they chose. And Britain was subordinate to Jews, who controlled the Empire and all important propaganda. And France and its African (and other) empire were struggling with Jews. And the USSR was clearly under the most vicious rule of Jews. The small east European countries such as Poland, Hungary, and Ukraine, had enormous problems with Jews. Germans had been Jew-aware for many years, and were seen as a threat to Jews, despite the tiny size of Germany on the world map. However, it was about the size of Great Britain when it included Ireland; and it had educated its population exceptionally well, leading the world in engineering, chemistry, and biology.
Freemasons. 1947: [Example of the slow ingress of revisionism]:-
British Colonel John C. Scott who gave an election speech on August 14, 1947 revealed the real underlying issues of the World War II. Scott claimed that at the conclusion of military operations in Poland a war by telegram was waged between the Allies and the German Foreign Office. He was one of the transmitters in those negotiations. The Allies gave the Reich two conditions, and their acceptance would have brought about an immediate cessation of hostilities, and a free rein for Germany in Poland. Those conditions were, Germany must return to the Gold Standard and the League of Freemasonry must be readmitted to Germany. This was not published until November 6, 1947 in
Tomorrow, which closed its article by stating "Some 55 million people had to die to make the Gold Standard in Germany permissible."
The question is: were German resentments and fury over the Great War, its start and sudden termination, and Jewish treachery, a serious threat to Jews? What should the world-wide thin layer of Judaism do?
We have to bear in mind traditional and probably unerasable Jewish habits, as found in the
Talmud, notably refusal to accept laws of any host countries, habitual lying and deceit—and particularly lying to different groups with the object of getting them to fight each other, the aim of killing 'gentiles', and the aim of taking control of assets. This sort of thing is not, of course, the way in which wars are traditionally presented. We have to consider for example: whether peace offers were never intended to be accepted, since Hitler and Churchill would be of one mind; whether Eisenhower dealing directly with Stalin to concede east Berlin was a Jewish move; whether Hitler's delays in retaliatory bombing had some such purpose as permitting Rothschild allies to move goods; whether deaths of (e.g.) Patton and Forrestal were Jewish murders, as perhaps were the large numbers of suicides of German Generals; whether the Allied dealings with small countries containing Jews, Poland being the most obvious, were influenced mostly by Jewish considerations; whether huge governmental loans, notably from the USA to USSR, were in support of Jews; whether unnecessary deaths were deliberate Jewish policy; and whether otherwise baffling military decisions, such as leaving Moscow alone, were in accordance with Jewish wishes, and maybe carried out by Jewish military personnel appointed by Hitler. And, of course, plenty more questions. It's of course not helpful that Jews and their collaborators in governments will destroy much documentation: for example German libraries after the Second World War were destroyed thoroughly, and records after the First World War were taken and locked away in the USA.
[But now, after reading so many articles and seeing so many images of Syria, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, etc., I believe the main objective is a genocide of millions of people who know the truth about Zionism. The genocide is occurring through military-murder and forced starvation. It is essential that the world investigate 9/11 and the truth come out.]
David Irving wrote, and is still writing, on the Second World War. Here's a
list of most of his books, starting with
The Destruction of Dresden (1963). He investigated many archives, and private sources—diaries, photographs, interviews. And became entangled in the issue of Jews in the USA deciding not to print his book (on Goebbels; for more, see the link in which his books are listed). Irving has been enormously energetic and impressive.
But there is missing information. Where are Irving's searches of Jewish archives, perhaps in Yiddish, if indeed they were written down, of information on American money funnelled to the Jews of the USSR, information on weapons industries and imports by the Jews controlling the USSR? And secret Jewish intelligence on the countries they secretly dominate or dominated, their
sayanim, the secret knowledge of bases and factories and airways and roads, and on movements and assassinations and so on, and numbers of dead goyim? What about food and other essential supplies? Jews will not spontaneously throw open their records. They are of course missing from Irving's work. ...
1 October 2004, on police archives—not of course Jewish archives
"Basing his conclusions on carefully culled scraps of evidence, historian Mordechai Zalkin states that until World War II, the underworld in Warsaw, Vilna, Odessa and other large cities was controlled largely by Jewish syndicates. By 'our' people. ... Mordechai Zalkin has spent much of the past 13 years burrowing in Eastern European archives. They are his laboratory, the place where he looks for the remote margins of Jewish history and brings them to life in his academic work. "When I work in an archive in Eastern Europe, and it doesn't matter whether it's in St. Petersburg or Moscow, one of the things that interests me is the collection of police files," he says. "What used to be classified intelligence files are now open. The police collected information as part of their work, and when I open the files, from 150 years ago, I find detailed reports about Jewish criminals. The archives have enough material for 100 historians and for 100 years, and even then they won't finish."
Four Giants & Three Dwarfs in Faurisson's phrase.
Giants are [1] British Empire [in red]; [2] USA, which realistically should include chunks of South America; [3] French Empire [green]; [4] USSR, disparate areas ruled by Jews.
Dwarfs are Germany, Italy, and Japan.
Maps of course don't usually show populations, resources, ownership.
Robert Faurisson (see his Revisionist Writings, for example
Four giants and three dwarfs: who wanted war? which includes what Faurisson calls
Churchill's four periods of exhortation in Britain). Churchill started with presumably fake support for Poland, 'which in two weeks was abandoned' when Stalin invaded. Faurisson of course was one of the first 'Holocaust' revisionists, including Anne Frank diary exposées.
The map goes some way to outline his four giants. BUT the serious omission is the Jewish overlordship of those regions and their subordinates.
And note Churchill's bombing started the day after east London was accidentally bombed by a single German plane. Assuming that prolonged bombing needs bombers, bombs, fuel, pilots, maps and the rest ready prepared, it's possible the bomb might have been planted deliberately; Churchill was busting to go.
Note also that part of the anti-German Jewish policy may have been to enlarge the apparent threat: Italy, under the
fake of Mussolini—Miles Mathis follows genealogical clues to Mussolini as actor, Popes, Jews from e.g. Venice, Italian aristocrats, writers and artists who turn out to be Jews, Savoy, Britain, MI5, though industrialists are bit fewer, and faked deaths a bit greater—and Vichy France, perhaps helped make the tininess of Germany less noticeable. And of course Japan had been funded by Jews to attack Tsarist Russia on the Russo-Japanese War, though their use to Jews proved smaller than the Japanese aristocratic leaders presumably had been led to believe.
from agatha.pdf
The first thing we notice is Hasso von Boehmer, a German Lt. Colonel who allegedly participated in the July 20 plot against. . . Hitler. And you thought I was boasting, didn't you? Since we have already discovered Hitler was a fraud, we may assume this entire plot is another fraud. This Boehmer has a slender bio, but it is full of numerology. He was supposedly born August 9 and died March 5. August 9 was the date of the Manson murders as well as the date of Nixon's resignation. March 5 adds to 8, and 8 was a favorite number in these hoaxes concerning Hitler, as we have seen again and again. Boehmer's superior was Henning von Tresckow, another strange name for a German. His father had been a general and he was Chief of Staff of the 2nd Army. His wife was a von
Falkenhayn, whose father was a general and Chief of the German General Staff in WWI. General Falkenhayn's mother was a Rosenberg, which is Jewish. We saw in a previous paper that the mainstream now admits that many German generals were Jewish. I wonder if Falkenhayn is on that list? If not, the list is too short.
[Just to jog your memory there, a Jewish researcher named Bryan Rigg in
Hitler's Jewish soldiers discovered at least 140 high-ranking Nazi officers who were Jewish, including 23 colonels, 15 generals, and two field marshals. (Miles Mathis expanded this list to include
Rommel here, in August 2021). However, I discovered Wikipedia has a page for this category, and yet lists only eight. Not 140, but eight. The list was WWII, and Falkenhayn was WWI, so I guess someone needs to make a second list.]
We have more indication this is all a hoax when we discover Tresckow had been in the Reichswehr in WWI, taking part in the faked Spartacist suppression. The Spartacists were all Jews as well, as we saw in my paper on the Beer Hall Putsch—including primary spook Rosa Luxemburg. Finding a Boehmer involved in this is just what I expected coming in.
There is a current Justus Henning von Boehmer, German lawyer, publisher, and banker. He was Secretary General of the International Chamber of Commerce, which has over 6 million members in 100 countries. He was COB of Stillhalter, a subsidiary of Sal. Oppenheim Bank (and the Oppenheims are closely connected to the Rothschilds). Note his middle name, which of course ties us to Henning von Treschkow, and also ties together Boehmer and Treschkow by blood. It is admitted he is the nephew of Hasso von Boehmer. But perhaps the most telling thing on his page is that he started the Jerusalem Foundation with Jerusalem mayor Teddy Kollek. Now, why would a good German Protestant do that, I wonder? Well, Boehmer's mother was a Poensgen, and her father was on the board
of Vereinigte Stahlwerke AG, the huge industrial conglomerate that included Thyssen AG. See my
papers on Hitler for more on that. We have seen that the men behind this conglomerate, including Fritz
Thyssen, were the ones who founded and funded the Nazis. So it is curious to see the Boehmers so
closely tied to them by marriage. If Justus Henning von Boehmer's uncle was Hasso von Boehmer, and
if his grandfather was on the board at VSAG, that must mean that Lt. Col. Hasso von Boehmer's father-
in-law was on the board of VSAG. They forgot to tell us that on his page, didn't they? So why would
he be plotting against Hitler, a man VSAG created? The answer. . . He wasn't. The whole thing was
theater, and the industrialists created both sides of the theater, both upstage and downstage. All to keep
your eyes off themselves.
So, what did we learn there? We learned the Boehmers are definitely Jewish, related or closely linked
to the Oppenheims, Rothschilds, Poensgens, and Thyssens.
Richard Verrall or Richard E Harwood wrote
Did Six Million Really Die? in 1974. As the title suggests, this book is almost entirely on the fiction of the 'Holocaust'. From today's perspective, the 'Holocaust' is misdirection; it is largely a waste of time, no doubt intentionally, for those wanting to understand the world. Verrall, after noting the Jewish policy of supporting mass invasions of white countries—which almost all of them support, just as almost all support the Holohoax fraud—wrote:
So far as the Jewish people themselves are concerned, the deception has been an incalculable benefit. Every conceivable race and nationality had its share of suffering in the Second World War, but none has so successfully elaborated it and turned it to such great advantage. The alleged extent of their persecution quickly aroused sympathy for the Jewish national homeland they had sought for so long; after the War the British Government did little to prevent Jewish emigration to Palestine which they had declared illegal, and it was not long afterwards that the Zionists wrested from the Government the land of Palestine and created their haven from persecution, the State of Israel. Indeed, it is a remarkable fact that the Jewish people emerged from the Second World War as nothing less than a triumphant minority. Dr. Max Nussbaum, the former chief rabbi of the Jewish community in Berlin, stated on April 11, 1953: “The position the Jewish people occupy today in the world—despite the enormous losses—is ten times stronger than what it was twenty years ago.” It should be added, if one is to be honest, that this strength has been much consolidated financially by the supposed massacre of the Six Million, undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity allegation of all time. To date, the staggering figure of six thousand million pounds has been paid out in compensation by the Federal Government of West Germany, mostly to the State of Israel (which did not even exist during the Second World War), as well as to individual Jewish claimants.
Verrall obviously regards that ‘remarkable’ situation—the triumphant minority—as a chance outcome of the War, something which emerged after the dust settled. He doesn't realise, or at least certainly doesn't state, that it may have been planned and scripted and costed all along. Furthermore, not planned as an isolated incident, but as just one megadeath-laden part of a long-term plan.
David Irving in 1981 published two books:
War Between the [Allied] Generals and
Uprising! [in Hungary, 1956]. My reviews. In my view, these represent a difference in awareness of Jews:
Uprising! on Hungary, inevitably, forced Irving to face facts about Jews.
CODOH ('Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust') has operated for many years, since 1987, and more so since the widespread use of Internet, but remains rather fixated on the Jewish 'narratives', including of course the Holohoax. It's necessary for them to do that, faced with Jewish propaganda, but of course diverts attention from the vast numbers of genuine deaths. But it is largely diverted from the entire subject of the Second World War; and the First World War; and the general subject of Jewish power and influence through the ages.
The advent of Internet has allowed ideas to flow worldwide to an unprecedented extent. This is my 1997 piece
Holocaust Revisionism, Free Speech, and Internet. (36,000 downloads from my site to date). Not quite first with the news, admittedly. And I had no idea that WW2 and WW1 might have been scripted all along. And revisionisms of other subjects—9/11 and the Jewish neo-cons wars of 'full-spectrum dominance', nuclear issues, false flags, fake philanthopists and charities and NGOs, genealogies—and more—were in the future.
SOME PARTIAL REVISIONIST INDIVIDUALS
David Duke My Awakening says all races should of course have ?rights. Doesn't face the facts of groups acting against interests. As you might say all forms of life have their value; so we should allow hyenas and lions and tapeworms and poisonous spiders ...
Michael A Hoffman adheres to Roman Catholicism and won't face facts about US wars
David Irving “Since 1938 Britain has chivalrously put up with these “refugee” guests, who now deny even that they are bankers, let alone responsible for the 2008 International banking collapse, and who never stop whining and interfering | U.K. Jewish body [='Hope not Hate', a phoney Jewish charity] now agitates for major bookshops to remove certain titles.—Thus Britain learns the hidden cost of inviting humble Jewish “refugees” into England in 1938—David Irving (b. March 1938) books all figure on these “ex-Germans” (as Anthony Eden called them) “burn” list, but mysteriously they have missed one: Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf!”
— A few puzzles here. David must know Jews had poured into Britain since at least the 1890s. He knows there are doubts about Mein Kampf.”
Arthur Kemp
March of the Titans, the complete history of the white race has nothing on Jews and in fact states that accusations against Jews are definitely untrue. And the site www.NewObserverOnline.com ------ What is going on here? is for sale in mid-2021
Kevin MacDonald of several books, including The Culture of Critique, and the website www.OccidentalObserver.com
MACDONALD C OF C narrow as in looking at small part of vast fraud nothing on 9/11 world wars US genocides is he serious???
recently piece by a 'jew' on 'why are professors liberal?' !!!
'Millennial Woes' persistently jew naive
Donald Trump will he open monuments to US war crimes? Jew war crimes? US defince of intl law? jews in 9/11?
Dennis Wise reconsider hitler?
THE ROAD TO FULL REVISIONISM
Jews and Religions and Money.
Evacuees. And the 'Blitz'. [ Top of page ]
This short piece is prompted by Miles Mathis' pdf file
The BLITZ is FAKE, first published 30 August 2023. It's copied
here. His claim is supported by evidence, much from Wikipedia which of course is generally unreliable. However, he makes a good case; the only question really is whether any German planes got through, at all. There must have been one for Rudolf Hess, presumably.
Anyway, Mathis's general idea is that the officials collaborated to support the illusion, and there's indirect evidence in the ineradicable form of laws on insurance against fire, bombs and so on. And, much less easy, military and air action against the civilian population. It seems that Jewish infiltrators are on this subject: Simon Webb, sometimes described a a 'historian', and quoted in McDonald's failed
Occidental Observer, came to my notice when I reviewed a book by him on
'suffragette bombers', all with a Jewish angle of omitting Jewish bombers and saboteurs. Webb also takes the view that field guns were used against some targets, without of course mentioning Jews.
The whole period of course needs revisionism. It came as a surprise to me to find that the Minister for War was Hore-Belisha, renamed (I'm told) from Horeb-Elisha and one of the cluster of Jews that included Churchill. And that Wavell was removed from command of the British Middle East by Churchill.
Related to 'the Blitz': I want to talk here of evacuees. Population movements have always been a feature of Jewish power. The nearest thing to day-to-day propaganda might be some of the multi-volume popular histories. There were similar tomes produced after the 'Great War'. However, I'll consult a rebel/thinker type, HG Wells. About this time, in his 70s, Wells realised that his ideas—wars & decisive battles, aristocratic lineages, military theories, 'Great Britain', theories of democracy and Parliament—were not explaining the world in the way he hoped when he wrote his history. Blow is an extract from
The Outlook for Homo Sapiens, published by Secker & Warburg (most or all of his publishers were Jews) in about 1942; I have a copy of that year. It's in the chapter called SOCIALISM UNAVOIDABLE. I've added my notes at the end:–
Taken from a wartime newspaper which of course must have been Jew-controlled. This cartoon is taken from Raymond Challinor's slim paperback
The Struggle for Hearts and Minds which I
reviewed about ten years ago, after meeting the author and buying a copy.
I recorded his talk on WW2 with his permission, on a hand-held tape recorder. 71 mins
here.
The changes that occurred in Great Britain in less than a year
[1] were astounding. They recall in many particulars the social dislocation of Russia in the closing months of 1917
[2]. There has been a shifting and mixing-up of people that would have seemed impossible to anyone in 1937. The evacuation of the centres of population under mere exaggerated threats of air raids
[3] was carried out by the authorities in a mood of frantic recklessness. Hundreds of thousands of families were broken up, children separated from their parents and quartered in the homes of more or less reluctant hosts. Parasites and skin diseases, vicious habits and insanitary practices spread, as if in a passion of equalitarian propaganda from the slums of such centres as Glasgow, London and Liverpool
[4], throughout the length and breadth of the land. Railways, road traffic, all the normal communications were dislocated by a universal running about. For a couple of months Great Britain was more like a disturbed ant-hill than an organised civilised country.
The contagion of funk affected everyone. Public institutions and great business concerns bolted to remote and inconvenient sites; the B.B.C. organisation, for example
[5], scuttled off headlong from London, needlessly and ridiculously, no man pursuing it. There was a wild epidemic of dismissals, of servants employed in London, for example, and a still wilder shifting of unsuitable men to novel, unnecessary jobs. Everyone has been exhorted to serve the country, children of twelve, to the great delight of conservative-minded farmers, have been withdrawn from school and put to work on the land, and yet the number of those who have {208} lost their jobs and could not find anything else to do, went up by over 100,000
[6].
There have been amateurish attempts to ration food, producing waste here and artificial scarcity there. A sort of massacre of small independent businesses began mainly to the advantage of the big provision-dealing concerns, which changed in a night from open profiteers to become the "expert" advisers of food supply
[7]. All the expertise they had ever displayed had been the extraction of profits from food supply. But while profits mounted, taxation with an air of great resolution set itself to prune them.
The British public has always been phlegmatic in the fade of danger, it is too stout-hearted and too stupid to give way to excesses of fear, but the authorities thought it necessary to plaster the walls with vast, manifestly expensive, posters, headed with a Royal Crown. "
Your courage,
your resolution,
your cheerfulness will bring us victory."
"Oh yus,” said the London Cockney. "
You'll get the victory all right. Trust you. On
my courage,
my resolution,
my cheerfulness ; you'll use up 'Tommy Atkins' all right. Larf at ’im in a kindly sort of way and use him. And then you think you’ll put him back again on the dust-heap.
Again? Twice?"
[8]
That is all too credible. But this time our rulers will emerge discredited and frustrated from the conflict to face a disorganised population in a state of mutinous enquiry. They have made preposterous promises to restore Poland and they will certainly have to eat their words about that. Or what is more probable the government will have to give place to another administration which will be able to eat those words for them with a slightly better grace
[9]. There is little prospect of Thanksgiving Services or any Armistice night orgy this time. People at home are tasting the hardships of war even more tediously and irritatingly than the men on active service. Cinemas, theatres, have been shut prematurely, black-outs have diminished the safety of the streets and doubled the tale of road casualties. The British crowd is already a sullen crowd. The world has not seen it in such a bad temper for a century and a half, and, let there be no mistake about it, it is far less in a temper with the Germans than it is with its own rulers
[10].
Through all this swirling intimidating propaganda of civil disorder and a systematic suppression of news and criticism of the most exasperating sort, war preparation has proceeded. {209} The perplexed and baffled citizen can only hope that on the nay side there has been a little more foresight and less hysteria.
The loss of confidence and particularly confidence in the government and social order is already enormous. No one feels secure, in his job, in his services, in his savings, any longer. People lose confidence even in the money in their pockets. And human society is built on confidence. It cannot carry on without it. |
The position of the ruling class and the financial people who have hitherto dominated British affairs is a peculiar one. The cost of the war is already enormous, and there is no sign that it will diminish. Income tax, super tax, death duties, taxes on war profits have been raised to a level that should practically extinguish the once prosperous middle strata of society altogether
[11]. The very wealthy will survive in a shorn and diminished state, they will hang on to the last, but the graded classes that have hitherto intervened between them and the impoverished masses of the population, who will be irritated by war sacrifices, extensively unemployed and asking more and more penetrating questions, will have diminished greatly. Only by the most ingenious monetary manipulation, by dangerous tax-dodging and expedients verging on sheer scoundrelism, will a clever young man have the ghost of a chance of climbing, by the old traditional money-making ladder, above his fellows. On the other hand, the career of a public employee will become continually more attractive. There is more interest in it and more self-respect. The longer the war continues, the completer and more plainly irreparable will be the dissolution of the old order.
Now to many readers who have been incredulous of the statement made in Section 27 of this book, that we are living in the End of an Age
[12], to those who have been impervious to the account of the disruptive forces that are breaking up the social order and to the argument I have drawn from them, who may have got away from all that, so to speak, by saying they are "scientific" or "materialistic" or "sociological" or "highbrow", or that the Providence that has hitherto displayed such a marked bias in favour of well-off, comfortable, sluggish-minded people is sure to do something nice for them at the eleventh hour, the real inconveniences, alarms, losses and growing disorder of the life about them may at last bring a realisation that the situation in Western Europe is approaching {210} revolutionary conditions. It will be a hard saying for many people in the advantage-holding classes, and particularly if they are middle-aged, that the old order has already gone to pieces and can never be put back. But how can they doubt it?
A revolution, that is to say a more or less convulsive effort at social and political readjustment, is bound to come in all these overstrained countries
[13], in Germany, in Britain and universally. It is a necessary and inevitable relief. Itis more likely than not to arise directly out of the exasperating diminuendos and crescendos of the present war, as a culminating phase of it. Revolution of some sort we must have. We cannot prevent its onset. But we can affect the course of its development. It may end in utter disaster or it may release a new world, far better than the old. Within these broad limits it is possible for us to make up our minds how it will come to us.
1 It's not clear from his text which year that was!
2 Like Russell, and no doubt multitudes of others, Wells had no real idea about the 'Russian Revolution', though the disgust with the war among Russians was no doubt common. Russell also thought the next war could be expected to end in many revolutions. Neither perceived the role of Jews. And note that a side-effect of Jewish secrecy and control is the impossibility of their announcing it or boasting about it. At least while they're not completely victorious.
3 There was a definite horror campaign of warnings about bombs. Wells doesn't make it clear how he knows it was exaggerated. Or why disruption might have been avoided, as with 'Anderson shelters'.
4 Glasgow, London, and Liverpool were all seaports, and just as immigrants into airports clustered in places like west London, ports must have had large numbers of pet Jews. Probably one point of evacuating them was to spread Jews around, though of course this would not be announced. There was something similar in the USA; New York and west coast ports were destinations for multitudes of Jews, and when US heroes returned home they often found their towns full of aliens.
5 I hadn't heard that the BBC (radio, then) moved from London. Various reasons are possible. One of the 'attractions' of modern London is a BBC room supposedly for a Churchillian last stand; which suggests the move was temporary.
6 Epidemics of dismissals: An aspect of monolithic states is that employment, once in the hands of distributed groups dotted around, swings towards employment for things desired by governments, in this case represented by many Jews. Wells's historical work (I think) underestimated the changes this caused; I'm not talking of his ignorance of Jews and associated secret groups such as freemasons, but sweeping movements making their jobs more secure, and other jobs less secure. The sort of thing which Kahals love.
7 Big provision-dealing concerns to this day, rather simple TV accounts show Jewish food businesses given a huge boost by government action.
8 Again? Twice? Wells perhaps doesn't allow for the time-intervals between wars. People adult in 1914 —born before 1894, say—would be 45+ by 1939. They wouldn't have the same experiences again.
9 By 'administration' Wells may believe something other than political parties would occur. In fact, he seems to think it was inevitable. I wonder if he was disappointed that the promise to Poland never became much of an issue. It was of course part of the build-up to war.
Note that Wells never considers that war could be averted. Again, this is the Jewish ratchet effect at work. Similar idea to the manufactured media noises over Pearl Harbor.
10 Black-outs have diminished the safety of the streets. Wells mentions road accidents, but not thefts, burglaries, sabotage. He doesn't mention the 'Shiksa trade', never having heard the word.
11 That excessive taxation would make it impossible for young people to make good was a common idea. Living on capital as they had once lived on income. Cyril Northcote Parkinson discussed taxes and duties and the impossibility of building capital. Wells doesn't mention, and perhaps had it never put to him, that long-term borrowing by governments is just another concealed way to increase Jewish power.
12 End of an Age. It's not clear to me whether Wells means a social revolution (he wasn't aware of Jews and forced immigrants taking assets). Or something more Biblical, an 'End Times' foreboding. Wells still had quite a bit of Protestant baggage.
13 As per note 2, at the time it was widely believed that spontaneous 'revolutions happen after wars. 'George Soros' seems to be relying on such outmoded mental habits. I can't tell if Wells really believed it, or just wanted to try to wake people up.
Short Note on Laziness [ Top of page ]
cp jews - powell talk at univ - jews and the fake 'russian revolution' - jewish coup.
contents of videos and audios. anyone running a site knows how difficult it is to get people to explain what a video or audio is about.
publication info: when was this? so it can be situated for example with a president
Please, try to find "Derrota Mundial" by Salvador Borrego says a Spanish reader. This book, if available in English, is one of the best about WWII. This author goes in detail, step by step, explaining as to why the German people rise against the system, and how, these great people were defeated by the enemies of Christendom and freedom. It is worth reading.
Hitchcock's synagogue - hard to find material, as v uniform
people who won't talk, eg Desjardins. People who won't expand, eg with scientists using old info
Bowden note: at a bnp meeting. great verve in trying to coach people. Only a few videos and recordings exist. / Only one video of fred leuchter (this is not true now; he's older but anti-Jewish establishment)
website and BNP newspaper note
no help for scandal victims
Amphetamines etc [ Top of page ]
I'm watching a video on Lethal Injections (over 8 hours; in fact largely concerned with medical errors, poisoning, drugs etc, not vaccines or 'vaccines'). It has wearying uninformed stuff on amphetamines and drugs for the 'perfect soldier', able to survive for a long time with little food and sleep! Without going into detail, a main point here is that, given Jewish control, they don't care about the final state of these puppet types, any more than they do with the target people.
Short Note on Jew Violence [ Top of page ]
Jew violence
Here's an example to test your grasp of Jew-related events. After Rhodesia was renamed Zimbabwe, many farms, including huge and previously-productive farms, were ruined and sabotaged. If you assume this was a result of the inability of blacks to understand modern farming, you may be right. But the process may have been intended to wreck the food supply. I'd suggest it's possible that the Soviet 'agriculturalist' Lysenko, with full support, was calculated to starve Russians.
include bombing
The message below was posted as a comment in truthseeker.co.uk, but I'd guess may be removed from there. It was drawn to attention by a post in The Occidental Observer, online.
It's possible that it was faked, as part of disinformation, or weakened with errors as part of discrediting. I don't think this is likely, but I'm aware of the possibility. I've corrected the spelling of some names, which may have been wrong in the original, or altered to make computer searches less likely to find them. I've added notes of my own as supporting evidence, and in small coloured typeface to leave the original comment more easily readable. If 'Peter Wilson' would like to talk, I'd do that if I can find the right person. - RW 1 December 2022
peter wilson on November 23, 2022 at 12:11 pm
I AM AN 85 YEAR OLD EAST LONDONER
HERE IS THE TRUTH ON THE BATTLE OF CABLE ST
As W W 2 looked increasingly likely in the 1930s, the Synagogues put out the message for all jews to get into anything to do with war supplies,
[*I assume Wilson must have referred to verbal messages, but perhaps also Jewish newspapers] Winston Churchill and Herbert Morrison the Home Office minister and minister for provisions, made sure everything came from jewish suppliers.
[*With Jews arranged as an octopus with worldwide tentacles, they have a long tradition of exploiting and causing wars. A British TV programme on the wonders of supermarkets praised a Cohen, famed as a market trader, who ended running Tesco, the programme pretending that markets in the small sense are training-grounds for huge supermarkets. It was mentioned that Cohen became part of the government war system of food distribution. Probably Lidl and Aldi are financed by Jewish long-term loan finance.]
Lord Lindemann,
[*Frederick Lindemann, though I doubt the spelling of his first name, disguised as '1st Viscount Cherwell', seems to never have had a deep modern biography written about him. Irving's Churchill II and Ponting's Churchill have only about two dozen references. He's described as a 'brilliant physicist', being 'professor of experimental philosophy' at Oxford—says Wikipedia. Tizard, Hankey, and many others must have been similar types. He is not described as a 'Jew' with Jewish attitudes despite apparently being from Jewish stock in Germany. Presumably he was involved with the early stages of faking the atom bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and plans for later. He may have proposed schemes in support of Jews, an obvious manouevre, and may have communicated in Hebrew or something like Yiddish via Bletchley Park. As far as I know all these things are uncertain. Both Wells (.. air mines ..) and Snow (..meeting reconfigured to exclude Lindemann..) and other figures knew him, certainly—I'd guess—very vaguely. I haven't checked his relationship with the Esau's Tears author, or indeed with Rammstain.] the cut out man
[*I'm not familiar with this expression] between Rothschild
[*This must be the Rothschild given much control in the Second World War. See my review of Peter Wright's Spycatcher] and Churchill, said on Jewish news, quote “This is one very good business opportunity for us all”
[*I haven't traced this quotation; 'Jewish news' most likely means a Jewish newspaper]
Herbert Morrison
[*Herbert Stanley Morrison, 1885-1965. Looks like yet another Jew with secrets from Wikipedia. Like Mandelson under 'New Labour' Blair, just another turncoat.] was Peter Mandelson's grandfather, Aleister Crowley
[1875-1947] Churchill's friend and fellow 33rd degree mason,
[*Freemasons' new London building was completed in the significant year of 1933] said of Morrison “he is so bent he cant even piss straight“
When our menfolk were fighting W W 2 the jews in the UK went to jewish doctors and got signed off war service with petty things like flat feet short sight and occasional severe headaches.
[*Jacqueline Gold's book Good Vibrations on sex shops says her father was exempted from WW2 on such grounds] This left the country at the mercy of swathes of jewish men.
London suffered very badly with these gangs, the Kray twins took over from Peter Rachman
[*See my review of the BBC on 1945-1975 Jews & Crime UK] who took over from Jack ”spot“ Comer and Billy Hill, until recently organised crime gangs were jewish and supported by Mossad.
Similarly in Northern Ireland drugs like ecstasy tablets
[*MDMA seems to have been given to German troops, but this looks like an anachronism to me. But Jew were involved in Ireland for years. Christianity was always manipulated by Jews and used to inflame rivalries. Even now 'Sinn Fein' works the Jewish policy of flooding Ireland with illegals.] etc came in by the thousand from Mossad to be sold by the Para-Militaries to raise money to buy israeli guns and explosives.
Master criminal Mad Frankie Fraser said in a TV interview that during the wartime blackout, the jewish gangs would go out at night to the shops and businesses who refused to pay them protection money, and rob them then set them on fire, they would then say it was caused by a stray German bomb.
[*WW2 Wartime Insurance must have been part of the Jewish fraud system]
Churchill himself used this excuse when he had the British Geneology centre burnt down
[*I think this is a reference to the 'Four Courts' building in Dublin, in which in 1922 many documents were lost, including genealogies. I haven't seen detailed accounts; perhaps this was intentional destruction. There must have been details of land ownership and the Ascendancy. The colour claim seems irrelevant here, though I'm reminded of Churchill's supposed claim that he wouldn't want to impose a colour problem. It occurs to me he must have been aware of Kalergi supporter.] with its births and deaths documents going back centuries, this was so that later he could claim that there were always people of colour here when they only started coming in after w w 2.
Houses and businesses were burgled, and the contents would be sold in London’s Petticoat Lane an area well known for fencing stolen goods. Black marketeers con men spivs
[*spivs = VIPs spelt backwards] fences and forged
[*Jews were famous for forgery. See e.g. Ellic Howe] food coupon sellers, all jews and all operating in london, the expression “oh what a lovely war” was heard on many jewish lips.
[*I've never heard that phrase explicitly attributed to Jews. A 1963 play and 1969 film of that title were 'developed' by Joan Littlewood and others, apparently nominally on the Great War. She married 'Ewan MacColl', as exposed by Miles Mathis, and later became the companion of Baron Philippe de Rothschild, the 'vintner and poet', to quote Wikipedia, which also says Littlewood was put on an MI5 list, with no detail.]
The soldiers away fighting, did not get their pay regularly, and many wives at home got into debt with the jewish moneylenders, the jews forced them to sign away their homes, many were forced into prostitution for the jews, and any who ran away had their faces slashed,
[*Cromwell is reported to have 'slit the noses' of women 'camp followers' to make them unattractive. It strikes me as possible that he was punishing women for not being co-operative.] ] this was why the jews were called “Razor gangs”, the Edgware Rd in London was where many teenage and even underage girls were forced to perform sexually for the jew, these girls were known as “shiksa trade” and a lot of money was made from the USA servicemen over here.
[*Alex Comfort said that prostitution was a 'reserved occupation' during WW2]
So the Muslim gangs who were recently exposed as raping hundreds of young kids is nothing new, and our government let both cases go on and on.
The broadcaster William Joyce had his face slashed for speaking out about wartime jewish crime.
I remember as a small boy my mothers small parlour in Londons East End would have the neighbours all cram in to hear William Joyce broadcasts, because British soldiers would call the BBC “Bullshit time”
[*BBC at the time was radio only. Although the sentiment is true, 'bullshit' sounds to me an anachronism] and as the war ended, people would say its over and we won, we did not win — we lost big time, but the jews all made fortunes, and they were all able to move to upmarket homes away from East London to Ilford
[*I remember an anti-white activist living in Ilford, but forget his name. This might do: ....1962 the then Conservative MP for Ilford North, Tom Lascelles Iremonger, sought to amend the 1936 Public Order Act by adding to Section 5 the inciting of 'hatred of a racial group' as an offence...] Barkingside and Chigwell.
One can read online about the Battle of Cable street,
[*Reported as October 1936, one of many, many events whose Jewish descriptions are fixed points in the Jewish view of history. But if John Wilson is 85 in 2022, he'd only be about 1 year old in 1936. Possibly some sort of trap?] i watched it from my window and the truth was very different. There was more fear in London of the jewish gangs than of Hitler, Oswald Mosely was a British Patriot and such a skilled politician that the Jews asked him to lead both UK political parties, but he refused.
Oswald Mosley set up the Blackshirts, men easily recognisable who could be called on for help, these men old or very young, as our strong healthy men were away fighting to get Germany away from Hitler and back under jewish control,
[*Mosley is not so easily-defined as propagandists say. Like Hitler. It seems likely that both were controlled opposition. See for example my review of My Life and hexzane527 on nationalistic movements and individuals] these brave men would stand guard outside shops and homes during the nights of the blackout to protect them, this was what caused the jews communists and racist types to fight the English families in Cable st.
December 2 2022 © Rae West
Approx GNPs in 1913
Ranting Loud Jew Liar vs Complacent Unanswering Christian. Berkeley, 2013—TO BE RE-UPLOADED - Apologies
This is the best I can do after Youtube removed my site (opens in a new window)
Jew 'verbal IQ': one Jew promotional slogan followed by another. But note also the complacently moronic Christian. [I presume the event was unstaged. Youtube insisted in the removal of "goy, dirty goyim, goyisha, kike and queer"]
How free am I? I'd be a lot freer if people like you were put in prison! As retaliation for the collective crime of racism, anti-Semitism, misogyny, and homophobia! All you fucking god-botherers are war criminals! And liars! And charlatans! Atheism forever!
[This is a thespian tryout?]
No, this is real! I'm throwing back everything you dirty goyim have thrown back at us! Hitler was a Christian! He killed Jews because his fucking non-existent god told him to! Hitler was a practising Catholic! I even found on the Internet a picture of a Nazi swastika it was made by the Nazis and it had a cross on it, it said God is with us in German! So don't give that stuff about Nazis. You know what, atheism is apolitical. Stalin was an atheist but you know who else was an atheist? Ayn Rand So atheism has got nothing to do with politics but only about the facts. And the fact is you look up in the sky and you know what you see? Sky, clouds, and the sun. Try hopping a plane above the clouds and you see more sky, more clouds, more sun. I really don't appreciate your medication payments cos of You people also got effective drugs banned just say no, no crap medicinal marijuana works psychedelics work look up at the research It was suppressed because of that Quaker bastard Nixon and his paranoia
[wonderful conversation here]
I tried debating with you people but you say Oh God did this and he's this magical man - He doesn't fucking exist! He's even less real than Mickey fucking mouse! And frankly the Disney company is responsible for a lot less death and destruction in this world than organised religion. [Are you capable of a two-way conversation?] Only with rational people. You're going around spreading lies about atheism? Well I'm just trying to correct them with the truth. And I have to raise my voice in order to be heard by choruses. You know where I come from you people ruined the south. I'm from the south - you people is the reason the south is a shit-hole. You people are responsible for slavery
[why are you afraid of a reasonable..]
Because I'm trying to stop you from killing any more Jews and any more queers, OK It's you people who are responsible for the suppression of homosexuality you people who are responsible for proposition hate you people who are responsible for Douma - you people who are responsible for ?? all the attacks on gay people - at least the ones the Muslims aren't responsible for you are the two - all religions are bad, but you two are the worst you have no redeeming factors whatsoever and the only reason because we allow you to live is because we don't stoop to your level
[So much for democracy, eh]
Democracy? Democracy is mob rule - Democracy is nothing but mob rule - Democracy is what gave us proposition 8 - Democracy is what took away a man's right to marry another man and a woman's right to marry another woman. So don't give me that crap about democracy. And anyway this country is a representative republic [...] All you goyim are alike. I see that smarmy smile and that calm attitude. Like a smiling cobra. And you got nothing to back me up. You know I'm right. This whole thing is a lie. It wasn't just Darwin who proved it. It was anybody who did their work after that. [You're afraid of debate] I'm afraid of getting queer bashed. Or called a kike or a faggot by some bat-wielding breeder thug. No, but his ideology supports violence. [..] You don't need Christianity to be nice to people. I am perfectly fine. But I am tired of tolerance of intolerance. No tolerance of intolerance! He's intolerant of atheists. I don't tolerate lies and neither should you. This is a place of learning, not superstition. Tolerance means putting up with things you don't like just for the sake of being civil. ... Yeh, and they take our rights. I'm from the south and I'm also Jewish. So I know these people. I grew up around these people. They have no redeeming values whatsoever. If it was not for their homophobia, if it was not for their anti-semitism, if it was not for the fact they use the law to enshrine bigotry into the United States constitution, at every chance they get and goyim freedom??? superstitious god-botherers. It helps me a lot. They are the people who bothered me in school. Going by what the Bible says, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. I'm sick and tired of Christians being tolerated. ... This is a free speech zone and I'm exercising my right to free speech to tell the truth about Christians... Stonewall was a fucking riot because of those goyische police. Christians are responsible for slavery. .. Christians stole the Torah... [Want a hug?] No. I'm too sweaty. It is Christianity that has done everything wrong... Remember the Weimar Republic was gay heaven, and look what came after it! Adolf Hitler
New ‘Holistic History’. Views of WW2 to Include Jews [ Top of page ]
The (((German invasion))) of the USSR makes perfect sense — as an engineered move of world Jews to kill whites.
The essential question, in the absence of complete evidence, is whether Jews in the 1930s controlled enough of the world to plan the entire war to their satisfaction.
This is my serious examination of the question. I'm taking an overview, to avoid endless detail. Secrecy makes it certain that many truths remains hidden. I've tended to put material new to me in here, but of course there's more—the Jewish issue may take centuries to unwind.
Here's my 55-minute video
Was Hitler an Agent? on this subject, including comments, with Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. And here's the smaller bandwidth uncommented audio of
Was Hitler an Agent? These are premature, but of course there's so much missing information I'm hoping it's better than nothing as an introduction.
Holistic History: Varied Examples
Death Rates in WW2 Arguably, the most important single net consequence of WW2. Many people, aware of the Holocaust fraud, think it's purely a money-making Jewish fraud. It is that, of course, but it's intended to hide the net death rates of WW2. These can be viewed as rough indexes of the importance assigned by Jews to different groups. Roughly, we have for some countries:-
Country | Populations at Start | Non-Jew Deaths | Percentage deaths |
Russia | | | | |
Germany | | | | |
UK | | | | |
France | | | | |
Poland | | | | |
China | | | | |
Japan | | | | |
India (before partition) | | | | |
USA | | | | |
'Jews' | | | | |
Military Control example Clearly an army could in principle root out and remove enemies. Why don't they? Control of armies and police is a neglected topic—probably related to the takeover of the Russia by Jews, who were supplied with weapons by Jews and given the secrecy, and bolt-holes, to take vicious action against whites in particular. Army law in slightly more civilised circumstances prevented criticism; appointment of passively obedient puppets is the usual pattern. Arrangements for repayments over centuries—at present there are no upper limits—have been made. However there seems no reason why careful thought might change this system. Why should a small collection of bankers be immune from defeat?
Modern USA example Arch Stanton [Feb 2018] Note the act of war committed by the Israelis by their attack on the USS Liberty, occurred in 1967 under the Johnson administration. That act of war was successfully pushed down the memory hole.
Another issue under Johnson was the lie about the Gulf of Tonkin incident that resulted in Congress giving a president the power to pursue war without declaring one. This allowed Johnson to dramatically ramp up the war in Vietnam.
Secretary of war McNamara, the Secretary of Defense that recalled sixth fleet jets rushing to the defense during the attack on the USS Liberty, admitted that the Gulf of Tonkin incident never happened. This resulted it the deaths of hundreds of thousands of American troops.
Early 19th Century German example Hegel (1770-1831) was at one time regarded as the world's leading philosopher. He wrote on what's translated as the 'world spirit', the 'state', 'idealism', and on law in the sense of something imposed onto people. Hegel (his maternal grandma's surname was Schnepf) was no doubt part of the intrusion into Germany of Jews. As far as I know, Hegel as predecessor to the
Protocols of Zion is not a usual interpretation, but ought to be borne in mind. 'Idealism' suggests the primacy of beliefs; the 'State' was more or less a city state, or Jewish 'Shtetl': remember Italy after a few conquests and added bits was not unified until 1871; nor was Germany, with a ceremony in the 'Hall of Mirrors', Versailles. US states were exceptionally large, and Russia and Africa not part of ideal 'history'.
Hegel's lectures on the philosophy of history were given at the University of Berlin in 1822, 1828, and 1830. This was before industrialism and the possibilities of progress led to unrest, when Marx was dispatched to pretend to support downtrodden workers, while causing damage to their causes. Hegel's idea of freedom is based on the rabbinical idea that their law is necessary to freedom; therefore free sheep need their law. (I'd suggest reading chapter 21 on Hegel in Russell's
History of Western Philosophy to piece together the various Talmudic bits, including making it obscure (but nevertheless giving the message), the praise of war, the 'dialectic method', the belief that one nation after another will conduct the 'world spirit', the primacy in effect of 'the Word', and the oddities such as the 'world spirit' moving west to the USA).
Hegelians in about 1900 dominated academic philosophy. If this seems incredible, consider the many low-grade academics spouting 'politically correct' Frankfurt-school style Jewish stuff at the present day, in a world with the US regime more or less run by AIPAC, and a high proportion of 'British' MPs 'Friends of Israel', the EU run by Jews, and worldwide censorship of Jewish activities.
USA in 1913 example The table (right) shows estimated GDP (Gross Domestic Product) converted to a common currency. (Absurdly, some are to 6 significant figures!) These are totals; amounts per head, and/or the distribution between persons, are not shown. Nor are subsistence amounts; or surplus; or finances available to industrialists and other sectors; or for example gold stocks; or amounts attributable to Jews. The Federal Reserve of 1913 allows, while it lasts, almost endless paper money to be manufactured. Such figures must have been contemplated by such types as Albert Pike, Coudenhove-Kalergi, Bernard Baruch, various Rothschilds and Warburgs et al, and military and naval planners worldwide.
Note that the distribution of ownership is not usually given in national accounts. (Marxists would give figures by class, if they were serious, and not just puppets of Jews). Note specifically that the ownership by Jews is
not given. Two countries with otherwise similar figures, one Jew-free, the other largely owned by Jews, are socially very different. Long ago, high percentages of land were owned by churches; a similar principle.
If everyone looks like getting on together, the Jewish divide-and-rule policy fails; Jews love fanning both sides of disputes, and not just fanning them but igniting and inventing them with violence and needling and looking for types of people who want destruction and glory eg generals wanting fame in war.
Note that USA is highest; UK and Germany about equal, but with Europe > USA. Many small countries with Jews behind the scenes. So [1] Repeat WW1 and weaken both Britain and Germany. USSR - can be fed with money to import weapons, or build factories for foreign management. ... loans to governments ... and debts of defeated powers...
British Education example The 19th century British Empire (or (((British))), perhaps) relied on British public school types [i.e. paid education], reliant on Thucydides and Caesar in their original languages. Many educators must have thought this was suitable; Hugh Trevor-Roper actually said it was near-perfect training. The Great War started to expose this error: Belloc states that many of the soldiers and participants had no idea that materials essential for victory were controlled by Jews.
Reformation (or 'Protestant Revolt') in Europe example I recommend new readers look at
mileswmathis.com/occult.pdf to try to piece together Martin Luther (mother née Lindemann), Jewish money, and Luther's later discovery and dislike of Jewish habits. This appears to have been a typical Jewish weaken-by-division move, followed, after a few centuries, by taking over Roman Catholic lands in the French Revolution. It was carefully hidden; in the expansion of British university 'education' in the 1960s,
G R Elton Reformation Europe was a standard work, by a Jew, hiding everything important.
Missing Parts of Conventional History
An important buried issue is the question of
'Intelligence'. Its importance is intentionally downplayed in juvenile media trash of the John le Carre type. So
the question is: in the 1930s, with a lethal deathgrip on Russia and its outliers, control over the USA with the Fed, control over the UK for even longer, and control in most of Europe including of course Poland, Rumania, Hungary—was the practical grasp of Jews and their local allies on business, transport, food, production, propaganda, and reserve armies of thugs sufficient to provoke and control a world war? Based on Jewish post-war achievements, including complete blanket propaganda on both world wars, I'd say yes, but it's questionable, just as the long-term stability of such a system is questionable.
The
main problem is the almost complete absence of documents specifically on Jewish influence: Jewish Intelligence, not of course just military, but concerned with assets such as mines, manufactures, weaponry, farming, and transfers of money and ownership. The greatest secrecy applies to Jews in the 'Soviet Union', where murders of Russians and thefts from them, legal changes to benefit Jews, and transfers of Jewish money to finance weapons and thugs, and genocides of groups in Russian territories, are of course secret to this day. There's of course secrecy in the rest of the world; in addition to wars, the extent to which the 'Great Depression' was induced by Jews, or the British Empire was costed up, or Japan and China coerced and corrupted, or science frauds planned.
I'm fairly sure that plans must have been loose enough to allow some piloting: Churchill was obviously chosen rather late in the day; the story of Hiroshima and Nagasaki took about a year to be botched together; the Holocaust fraud was slowly pieced together with Jew media and liars and nudges, and at present has been decided as suited to full-on lying. And I hope some new theory, comparable in importance to Newton or Wallace/Darwin, might emerge, to deal with human groups and their hierarchies and genetics and senses, and which might have explanatory power. Preferably soon, and not in a few thousand years.
(
In 2018, missing pieces of the WW2 jigsaw are I think mostly Jew-related: nobody seems to have questioned Jewish persons in intelligence to see what they were doing, or poked around in world-wide Jewish activity. Post-World-War-2 Jewish domination of 'professions' seems to have had something of a free pass: the presumption is, that a nominal title confers competence. Jew-enforced practices such as networking in both frauds and simple low-grade propaganda, 'affirmative action', and BBC anti-white promotions have succeeded in lowering standards to terrifying depths. I noticed recently what looks like a joke:
Universities must protect free speech and "open minds, not close them", the universities minister has said in a speech in Birmingham. Jo Johnson said "no-platforming", the policy of banning controversial speakers, is stifling debate. From next April [2018], a new regulator—the Office for Students—will have the power to fine universities that fail to uphold free speech. Maybe someone has noticed—or more likely it's just a feint). A more recent newspaper lie was that universities 'fiercely guard their independence'!
• It's impossible to form definite views. But we can view the
slow relaxing of censorship of Second World War spying as part of the picture. It has become clear that Germany was almost completely penetrated by spying. It's also clear that spying on the USSR was unimpressive, or secret: facts on Stalin's extermination of entire nations, or on the arming of the USSR and the various, not necessarily financial, arrangements, are not available to researchers. The obvious guess is that, were information on Jews and the USSR more freely available, the domination of Jews would be clear, just as better information of spying has made Jewish domination more visible.
So our conclusions have to be partially inferred from what actually happened.
The starting-point for understanding WW2 is to observe the world situation just before it. Whatever the quantities, it's clear the USA, USSR, European countries, Australia, South Africa, with serious interference in Japan and China, were controlled by Jewish money; no serious or prolonged criticism or comment surfaced in any of these countries, and this must have been a result of legal ownership, secret thuggery, and intermediaries of the 'Freemason' type. There was little political or religious criticism or comment. International activity, potentially important in changing the situation, existed, but not in any very effective form. We can infer that almost all political activity was controlled by Jews. The principal difficulties Jews had were the absolute need for secrecy and lies, with the tiny, but always present, possibility that parts of the edifice might crack and begin to collapse.
Understanding Jews — Every Country has Them
Anyone wanting to understand the modern world must realise that Jewish wars are now part of continuous policy, which of course Jews have traditionally kept secret. So note the importance of the First World War as a break with the past caused by fuller emergence of Jew power grabs. And note continuisms: death 'duties' were introduced in Britain before WW1, just in time to ruin aristocratic families whose sons died in the war. Social security was introduced by Beveridge after 1945, but the Jewish motive was to help invade Britain with aliens, a policy which began in 1948 when Jew shippers imported blacks from the West Indies. War policies included bombing of any building which was not Jew owned: Japan, Germany, Greece, Korea, Vietnam suffered this, and France in part, and Britain slightly. Jews avoided tax in many ways, for example passing shares to younger people. Jewish activities, including mass murder in the USSR, and propaganda lies, ought to be considered as unified policies.
Understanding Jews takes time. Their habits of thought are so alien to most people that they simply can't believe the depths of hate and loathing Jews have for 'goyim'. It's difficult to recommend a learning resource: it's such an important issue that 'education' systems avoid it completely.
Talmud evil anti-Christ is my guide to three online sources of the Talmud, including links to several sites, but it's difficult to get ordinary people to understand the depths of evil in the Jewish system. Why not read and find out?
A similar Catholic site on Judaism is
Judaism.is, 'an educational primer about Judaism and its effect on history, culture, and current events.'
Here's my
review of Michael Hoffman's Judaism's Strange Gods. Interesting points include the primacy of the Talmud, the meanings of 'goyim' and 'shiksa', the Jewish holidays (which vary within about a month—worth knowing about for predicting or hindcasting exceptional events—and legal dodges to escape otherwise-binding oaths, such as 'Kol Nidre', which help explain Jewish contempt for laws, and the command to 'kill the best of the goyim'. Another issue is numerology or 'gemmatria': Christopher Jon Bjerknes suggests both the 6 million figure comes from [something like] 'ye shall return' in ?Hebrew. The phrase says something like 'ye shall return after 6 million deaths'. 1948 return to Palestine also supposedly encoded. It follows that alert people must check dates in the Jewish calendar and words encoded in ways interpreted by Jews. This however is in a Youtube dated 2020.
The appropriate reply would seem to be
kill the worst of the 'Jews'.
The dodging of laws is an important part of Jew supremacism, and explains why (for example) everyone seems to accept the Jewish decision not to sign the USSR to the Geneva Convention—allowing Jews to mass murder whites—but not accept killing of Jews in Europe; or inflicting the death penalty on 'goyim' but not Jews; or dodging humane slaughter laws; or to allow Jew loans to be upheld, even if they lead to Jew murders. Race laws seem designed to give Jews special treatment—Synagogues and even Jewish law are permitted, despite their explicit hatred against hosts. Similarly, Jew funding of wars seems to get a free pass under all circumstances: Generals, Politicians etc can be held responsible, but not, at least in modern times, financiers, and technologists. Though from victims' viewpoints, there's no reason why they should be immune: it's part of the way the world is at present organised. Most other people have no choice but take their chances.
Take away the message that here is an organised group who want to kill off rivals—and refer to them as 'cattle' and 'whores'—and who have been very successful in this. Read up, and find out. And decide to do something about it. Read about 20th century wars, and how it was that potentially normal decent people have been corrupted and deceived and killed and been killed. The entire future for all time is in the balance.
Opposing Jews
** Opposing jews
splitting jews:
outlanding stink jews weirdos an embarrassment; hence reformed synagogue. could be that hairy mixed breed jews with whites saying all white women should be raped is aimed to get rid of them?
jews specialise: obviously by country and language, but also subject - false flags/ fake 'historians' making up crap - money grabbers in rents, shares, tarding where there are fiddles, inc tax
-Secret pretence of being jews to infiltrate
-cutting off international connections
-expertises - [1] finding out about jew funding of eg migration groups, child sex, legal actions, housing, 'education', news frauds, funded fake demonstrations, harming science of eg archaeology, genetics etc, media expertise
-eyes open for huge underground places, death machines, such things as plagues, black death, lead in wine in Rome, apothecary deaths/ escape places with food, water etc
-spreading info about Talmud and Jewish history
-History of Jews, Christians, Muslims
-Find splits and disrupt e.g. 'Reform' Judaism 20th century n e.g. London
-Find splits by topic. Jew somewhat divided by language, race mixture, subjects such as financial frauds, holohoax lies, local harms and aggressions, forced migrations, educational harm.
-Exploitation of Jewish fantasies: Chosen People for example invites total exclusion
-Disputes on for example returning money they defrauded by Holohoax
Reconsidering Wars from First Principles: Will Patterns Emerge?
And the subsidiary question: will Jewish influence be removed, and. if so, will horrific wars continue? Here are six examples; they are remote from conventional military history and it has to be hoped something might come from analysis. 'Tomatobubble' [Apr 2020- now realhistorychannel.org] listed 'backstabbings' by 'the NWO gang', presumably meaning Jews, in 2014–
JAPAN: 1904-05 | THE HONEY: the U.S. branch of the NWO gang made a sweet offer to Japan: "Fight Tsarist Russia for us. We will finance you big time and you'll get you a chunk of Manchuria after the war." |
THE STAB-IN-THE-BACK: Japan won the war and established control over much of Manchuria (see maps above). But just 36 years later, the U.S. picked a fight with Japan. The Japanese Empire would be destroyed by the NWO, and Manchuria was handed over to Soviet control.
RUSSIA: 1907 | THE HONEY: the NWO gang made a sweet offer to Tsarist Russia: "Join the British-French in the Triple Entente Alliance. When the coming Great War against Germany & Turkey is settled, you'll get Constantinople (Istanbul) back from the Ottoman Turks who conquered the great city of the Orthodox Byzantine Empire in 1453." |
THE STAB-IN-THE-BACK: World War I proved devastating for Russia. The NWO-funded Bolsheviks used the disaster to bring an end to the Russian Empire and usher in a reign of Red Terror. [To this day, genocide of Armenians as a Jewish plan with Turkey is barely discussed].
POLAND: 1939 | THE HONEY: The British & French branch of the NWO gang made a sweet offer to Poland: "Pick a fight with Hitler's Germany. We'll back you up and you can have a huge chunk of German territory. The old Empire of Poland will be restored." |
THE STAB-IN-THE-BACK: After provoking a German invasion, Poland was left out to dry by the Allies. Not only did Britain & France do nothing to help Poland fight Germany, they later remained silent as the Soviet Union invaded Poland from the East; murdering much of the leadership of Poland's military.
CHINA: 1937-45 | THE HONEY: The U.S. branch of the NWO gang made a sweet offer to Nationalist China (Chiang Kai Shek). "You fight Japan and we will support you. After the war, Manchuria will be Chinese and we will do lots of business together." |
THE STAB-IN-THE-BACK: After World War II ended, Manchuria was taken from Japan and placed under Stalin's control, not China's! Chiang Kai Shek was shocked by the betrayal. From Manchuria, Stalin was able to arm the Chinese Communist rebels under Mao Tse Tung. U.S. pressure on Chiang Kai Shek would later undermine his ability to suppress the Communist rebels. China finally fell to Mao's Reds in 1949. Manchuria was then given to Communist China as Chiang Kai Shek and his Nationalist followers fled for their lives, to the island of Taiwan.
IRAQ: 1980 | THE HONEY: The U.S. branch of the NWO gang made a sweet offer to Iraq (Saddam Hussein): "You fight Iran and we'll arm you. After the war, you can have control of Shatt al-Arab Waterway and we'll do lots of business together." |
THE STAB-IN-THE-BACK: The mutually destructive 8 year war finally ended in 1988. Two years later, the U.S. attacked Iraq and imposed 13 years of brutal economic sanctions. In 2003, the U.S. invaded Iraq, ruining the country and killing Saddam Hussein.
LIBYA: 2003-2011 | THE HONEY: The U.S. branch of the NWO gang made a sweet offer to Libya: "Give up your Weapons of Mass Destruction and your nuclear program, ask Iran to do likewise, and we'll establish good relations and business ties with Libya." |
THE STAB-IN-THE-BACK: After foolishly giving up Libya's best defenses, Qaddafi's Libya was invaded by NATO jets, US Special Forces, and CIA trained "rebels". The invaders attacked Qaddafi's convoy; capturing him, and then torturing and murdering him on film. Libya remains in chaos.
Was Hitler a Jewish Agent? Questions and Answers [ Top of page ]
The questions below are from online sources, insisting that Hitler couldn't possibly have been an agent, working for Jews and Freemasons against the Germans. These are verbatim and probably as convincing as their authors wanted them to be.
• The eleven-point list (Aug 8 2016) and ten-point list (Jan 2013) seem to be by
digger-for-truth from renegadetribune.com. My replies in red.
• And I've included a
long comment by 'Bernt Busch' taking the opposite view from digger-for-truth.
• I've added a set of comments on
Hitler's outlook, possibly written by a German National Socialist member, which its author regards as evidence for Hitler's world philosophy.
• Here's a short exchange,
trying to persuade Jan Lamprecht
• I had
no replies from 'Dennis Wise' or from Christopher Jon Bjerknes
• Finally, here are some
overlooked notes for believers in Hitler as the definitive opponent of 'Jews'.
Intro and 11 pointsWhat he was able to achieve in just a few short years in Germany (1932-1939) verges on miraculous. He took a people and a country which had been utterly and mercilessly devastated by the ridiculous restrictions, constraints and horridly unjust retributions by the Versailles Treaty of WWI, and with no gold in the treasury, resurrected Germany’s currency, transformed German society into one of egalitarianism, shredded class consciousness and privilege that had kept different levels and layers of German society separate and at each others throats for centuries, and unleashed the creative Genius of the German mind, resulting in the flourishing of the arts and sciences on an unprecedented scale. (How many people know that Germany actually broadcast the 1936 Olympic Games via television cameras and projected the games throughout Germany on large screen projector television sets located in theaters around the country?)
Hitler did his level best to awaken the rest of the West to the economic, financial, educational, artistic and cultural assault of The Chosen Ones against the civilized world. Unfortunately for us, the forces of darkness ultimately crushed—temporarily—the Germanic forces of Light. The only true goal of The All-Lies during World War II was neatly summed up by Churchill: the utter destruction and complete annihilation of Germany and the German people—for the simple reason that Hitler and Germany threatened by example to show the rest of the world that The Chosen’s usury and gold were not necessary to create a vibrant economy based on truth, beauty and justice.
—This is what's often said, very sincerely. By the 1930s Jews had firm control of all currencies. Probably their aim was to toughen up their presence in the USSR, by building up arms factories, motor factories, etc, using foreign technology. It must have been expensive to kill Russians. This was funded by leaving the USA and UK in depression, and stealing gold where possible, selling Ukrainian food, etc, in addition to money transfers. Probably many companies (including Ford) had the option of taking their money, or going bust, just as many weapons companies produce for Jews rather than have smaller incomes. People in the USA and UK were left in Depression. The NSDAP regime never produced detailed evidence of what they did—there was no Volume 3 of Mein Kampf. I think Germany was allowed to rip ahead (i) so it would fight the Russians in the USSR and kill many of them, (ii) to give the Russians motivation to fight 'for the motherland', (iii) to provide valuable assets and patents which were seized when Germany was piloted to defeat. (NB Churchill was not a business man and had no experience with large businesses—he had to be force-fed with Jewish money; and gave no figures or evidence, and said nothing about loss of empire and British bankruptcy—about as serious as claims that immigrants will pay pensions)
If Hitler was an agent for the jews—then why ...
1
haven’t all the key historians/revisionists such as David Irving picked up on this theory in all the collective years of their intense detailed research? David Irving (as just one example) has spent 20 years of his life, at a professional level, detailing Hitler’s life and the logistics of WW2. Are we to believe he just happened to overlook this glaringly awkward anomaly? David speaks fluent German, has lived in Germany, and has interviewed heaps of SS officers and relevant people who were around Hitler’s war effort. He has looked under every stone, meticulously scrutinizing all the German detailed documentation (being able to understand it/translate it himself). David was a super sharp-minded individual at the time of his research. He was a real threat to the Jews and was incarcerated for his incredible efforts and levels of accuracy. No way would a man of this calibre just repeat the narrative of others. He was/is a competent and independent researcher. And there are heaps and heaps and heaps of similar detailed WW2/revisionists/researchers like him. Have they all overlooked this fantastic theory? An agent? Come on.
—It is unquestionably true that David has researched, not only in official archives, and private records, but also diaries, technical details, personal enquiries, and much more. But the ‘maximising non-Jewish deaths’ hypothesis is not likely to show evidence in these searches. He would need to investigate Yiddish and Hebrew sources—which may have been word-of-mouth only, or faked—and secret financial and military and assassination archives, and specifically try to interview Jews in Germany and Russia. Co-operation between groups of Jews in controlled countries would be extremely secret.
Just as examples, would the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Jews controlling GULags and Pravda, Soros and financiers of war materials, be willing to talk to David? Of course not. Would collaborating non-Jew officials and businessmen and historians and journalists willingly talk? Almost certainly not. Would bought-out ex-leaders give interviews, as is alleged e.g. of (wide spread of examples) Woodrow Wilson, Churchill, Wernher von Braun, 'Buzz' Aldrin, F W de Klerk, Tony Blair? Would Jews responsible for torture, assassination, false-flags, attacks on Arabs and so on, explain their activities? Would Jews who bought up assets from starving Germans give full details? Would Freemasons hand over their archives? Would weapons designers give full details on payments?–of course not. Irving has many accounts of being denied access even to ordinary archives; and many government files are still closed, particularly those (for example, of Britain's 'Royal Family') which are likely to bring discredit. The usual discussions of Hitler assume he acted on his own, as people used to think Stalin was on his own. The wider hypothesis has to seek evidence for secret agreements at the high levels.
2
[why] did the jews use a humble man from a humble background, and not use one of their own ilk? Hitler came from a working class background, orphaned later on in his childhood, on the streets so to speak, living hand to mouth selling street paintings. Does this smack of one of their boys? They could have used any number of honed agents. As they have with so many other agent-leaders. And please don’t suggest he was just bought off. There is zero indication of this. An agent? Come on.
—Hitler's family changed names. Many leading Nazis changed names, too. It's impossible to be sure of his real background, though Miles Mathis has done valiant work in deciphering families and their relationships, which incidentally shows them to have been wealthy.
3
[why] was he the only ‘agent’ who was an authentically brave soldier fighting in the trenches? This man had more courage than all of us put together. Hitler relished the opportunity to fight for his county, and for the spirit of the Germanic/Aryan race. He was injured twice and hospitalised. He loathed cowardliness and those who would not contribute towards the war effort. Just look at reports from someone like Leon Degrelle who spoke of Hitler’s remarkable bravery. An agent? Come on. [please see video below of Leon Degrelle].
—It's impossible to be certain if the stories about Hitler are true. But note that they involve fighting whites. There's not much in them about fighting Jews.
4
[why] did Hitler abolish usury? The jew’s number one control weapon. Why oh why would the jews allow a leader/agent to show the results of a county without this parasitism, knowing this would be broadcasted all across the world? ‘Look, look what can happen when you rid your country of the parasite and the parasite’s main tool’. An agent? Come on.
—Usury is not the ‘number one control weapon’. The main Jewish weapon in Hitler's time since 1913 was the Federal Reserve, the legal swindle allowing them to print money, buy up most media to control propaganda, buy up businesses and assets and collaborators, and control long-term credit and lending to governments; in modern Britain, this has applied since Cromwell, and in the USA since its Revolution, sealed by the war of 1812 and a century later with the 'Federal Reserve'. As I've mentioned in several places, 'usury' meant the practice of taking almost the entire assets of a defaulter, far more grasping that a few per cent.
The reference to ‘usury’ was probably aimed at German Roman Catholics. And in any case, it's unlikely that in practice the Church ever opposed usury; they relied on tithes and rents, and such things as cathedrals and church buildings must have kept them in debt. Their giving the monopoly of loans to Jews suggests a quid pro quo arrangement. They even kept information on the Talmud to a minimum, sometimes destroying all copies instead of publicising them.
5
[why] was Hitler the only ‘agent’ who was clean living? He was a teetotaller, vegetarian, who promoted traditional remedies, anti-vivisection, and promoted naturalistic lifestyles for his people. It is well recorded his affinity toward animals. This is a man of compassion, a man of substance who is deeply connected to nature—not an anti-nature sellout. An agent? Come on.
—Hitler also never got up before noon. Your comments seem accurate, and his behaviour un-Jewish, but this doesn't have any political impact. Anyone can love animals, and love nature; but still be hostile to some human beings, because they are a potential threat.
6
[why] would he be slung in prison if he was an agent? And he was! This has been thoroughly documented by eminent historians. That cannot be disputed. Yes, he was not in for so long considering his plot. But this was because the authorities knew the pressure would come from the people if they held him indefinitely. Also there were good people on the inside who wanted change, who were jew-wise and knew of the potential and genius of this man. Society and people were not as corrupt back then. An agent? Come on.
—You don't seem to know about false flags, disinformation, and all the rest of it. Jailing Hitler—especially in a large luxurious place, Landsberg prison, working with many friends and colleagues—is consistent with a false flag operation. In the same way, Hitler at one point is alleged to have jailed a Rothschild. In both cases, the point is they were let out.
7
[why] did he radically improve the working man’s lifestyle? He improved the working conditions, doubling the wages, reduced/eradicated their debt, instigated and provided an affordable Volkswagen (people’s car), built infrastructures to allow the working classes to travel around the country, make foreign cruises affordable/or for free, etc, etc, etc. An agent? Come on.
—Some NSDAP achievements are suspect, on examination. The Autobahnen for example were major undertakings (the UK and USA at the time only had simple motor roads, like the A1=Great North Road in Britain). Possibly improved roads allowed Germany to be invaded more easily, and helped reduce differences between German areas after the Unification. (I suspect the Maginot Line in France may have been intentionally badly planned).
There's uncertainty about actual budgets, and subsidies, and achievements. Hitler, and/or others, wrote about struggle, but not about his achievements. The point here may have been to build up Germany, but with the view of ensuring a bigger war in the USSR later with maximum casualties and maximum profits. And to use Germany as an experimental laboratory: it had shown itself superior to the USA and USSR.
Remember that Jews in the USA controlled the Fed, and were subjecting the USA to a depression, while paying Jews in the USSR to massacre whites, steal all their goods, and generally build up the 'State', which is the euphemism for the part of the economy controlled by Jews. Jews also controlled the (((British))) and (((French))) Empires, which were waiting to be fleeced. Jews could and did easily channel money to Germany.
8
[why] were Hitler’s/NSDAP’s policies carried through to the T? Just look at the congruency they had. Every-single-one of these policies were anti JWO. P-l-e-a-s-e don’t tell us that this was all part of a bigger plan. That somehow the sneaky jew would allow all these policies to magically work out in order for them to later on smash them down. An agent? Come on.
—There may be some truth in that; but control of assets is almost invisible, being a matter of secretly-held documents and obscure legal arrangement. But in fact even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the hyperinflation. And the policies were probably not carried out to a T. For example, Freemasonry was allegedly taken apart there; but in fact, although contents of Lodges were put on display, as far as I know there was no exposure of their actual activities. And there's a puzzle over synagogues; the number is uncertain, and I haven't found a single reference in any of the conventional 'histories', or Mein Kampf, and no action seems to have been taken to close them; in fact possibly 'Kristallnacht' was a Jewish fake, to pretend there was. And despite 1935 actions, there were many Jews in the Wehrmacht. 'Many senior officers with Jewish ancestry won special permission to serve from Hitler himself.'
9
[why] if he was ‘their bitch’ did he make approximately 20 peace offerings to both France and Britain? It was a well known fact the infatuation Hitler had for Britain and its empire, in the theme of Aryan enhancement. An agent? Come on.
—One of the objects of Jews was to take over the (((British))) Empire's assets, and transfer them to the USA. During WW2, a German slogan was ‘The World Empire Falls’. It would have been a simple matter for Jews to weakly publicise the peace offers. This would certainly have made German soldiers feel exasperated and even more justified in going to war, since they were told there had been serious peace offers. Whether the offers were intended to be put into action, is difficult to judge.
10
[why] if he was just a puppet of the jews did he have 98% of the people on his side? I know voting today is an utter scam. I also am aware how stupefied and zombified people are today, with pro Trump whatever. I know voting is just more of the Jewish dialectic. But back then in the 30s the people were not the zombies they are today. Yes, the populace have always been malleable to an extent, but the German people were raw and far more politically aware back then. The people knew in their hearts and minds that Hitler was oozing authenticity, that he surged with passion for his people, for his race, and for Europe as a whole. And with 98% of the people behind you—miracles can happen. Real transformations happen that way. The main base of funding came from the PEOPLE and not from the bankers as too many people like to propagate. An agent? Come on.
—I agree he was popular, and the NSDAP seemed popular; although the famous film Triumph of the Will had 30,000 extras. Many Russians under Jewish 'Communist' propaganda influence seem to have accepted Stalin. Unfortunately, it may have been a case of clutching at straws while Jews secretly armed the USSR and wiped out educated Russians, and while the USA had its vast manufactured depression. And bear in mind that Hitler supported the Führerprincip and hated democracy—both Jewish principles.
11
[why], o why, o why is Hitler THE number one vilified person on the planet to this day? Because he was one of their boys? Because he played his role? Because he sold out? Because he was somehow bribed? No. It is not complicated. The very simple reason this man is portrayed as THE most evil man that ever lived is because he was THE man who stood up to the big bad jew. He made an impact like no other man on earth. He set a precedent. Look world, look what can happen to your country if you just stand up to the evil jew. Kick the parasite out and stand back and watch how things organically naturally heal. And that is why the International Jewry absolutely panicked. That is why there was an all out effort to destroy this healing process. Not because he was part of the bigger plan. An agent? Come on. Hitler an agent—wotta crock’a shit.
—Yes; that's an attractive argument. Certainly the Great War was an eye-opener for many, with its unaccountable start, and unaccountable halt. And the publicised Balfour Agreement, and entry of the USA under Wilson into the war. And the vast Jewish propaganda. So was the Jewish coup in Russia (the so-called ‘Russian Revolution’) and the horrific fiasco in Hungary under Bela Kun. And many Germans as a result hated Jews. But they got nowhere politically. Hitler may have been chosen precisely because he was—in secret, in practice—moderate, as the New York Times said in 1922. It's true that Hitler was vilified, but any real or supposed enemy of Jews is vilified. Far more vilified were the Germans themselves, and Europeans and whites now.
10 Reasons why Hitler was one of the Good Guys [ Top of page ]
1
He never wanted to kill any Jews Whenever you hear anyone espouse (repeat) the lies about Hitler the nasty Jew-killer. Please always make a point of asking this very simple question: “Where did you get that information from?” Perhaps we all at some point have repeated this fable. Why would we not, when it’s shoved down our throats 24/7, year in year out for decades(?) There hasn’t been a man on this planet who has been demonized as much as Herr Hitler. If Hitler wanted to kill Jews, why oh why throughout all his speeches and manuscripts and his book Mein Kampf did he not mention this? Did he just forget? No, he didn’t say or write it BECAUSE HE HAD NO INTENTION OF KILLING THE JEWS. No matter what amount of destruction he had observed done by the Jews to his people; he had enough self-discipline and ethical code not to take revenge. Being a strong character, he was able to rise above the darkness, the demonic standards of the judaic mindset and show self-restraint and humility. That is why he created ‘containment work camps’ for the Jews and certainly NOT death camps.
—You don't seem to realise you've taken on Jew propaganda: 'nasty Jew killer' is of course a Jewish defensive stab. If Hitler had serious awareness of Jews, notably in the USSR, he would have recognised and felt deeply that Jews are a dangerous enemy. The only killings Hitler carried out were of Germans who understood Jews, contrary to his supposed policies.
2
He cared about conditions for the Jews in the work camps Unbeknown to billions of people the Nazi camps were not death camps, nor were they places to carry out human experiments. They were simply containment camps. (See the newer section on
'Concentration Camps' Something had to be done with these destructive anti-social Jews who were strangling Germany. Thanks to the Jews, Germany had lost its moral code and had become debased and de-cultured ....does that ring a bell? Something had to be done! And Hitler did do something—he placed all the Jews in containment camps to allow Germany to breath again. But—this is the key point in this essay/piece. He did it in a way which was ethical. The camps had decent sufficient food (bearing in mind it was war time), they had theaters, swimming pools, football pitches, post offices where inmates could communicate to the outside world, kindergartens, art and music recreation and even prostitutes. Quality sanitation within the camps was paramount and that is why the inmates clothes were regularly de-loused with zyclon B gas. There were no human gas chambers......THAT IS A BIG FAT KOSHER LIE; to which the world has had to endure for over half a century. My theory is that if there had not have been a war effort, Hitler would not have even made the Jews work. AND I bet you the containment camps would have been luxury rehabilitation centers. In order to slowly de-programme the Jews from their mind control cult.
—But if Jews were such a menace, and such a dangerous enemy, why on earth should Hitler and the National Socialists have been nice to them? Jews in Russia were murdering millions. Yet (according e.g. to David Irving) whenever Hitler took action on Jews, it was to shield them. And note: Hitler in Mein Kampf said if Israel came to exist, it would become a refuge for Jewish crooks and criminals. It sounds to non-Jews a dreadful prospect. But it's possible it was bait, to sell Israel to Jews. They may not have thought of 'Israel' like that. It didn't exist, but maybe the idea appealed to them. Oy veh, our very own base for operations!
3
He had compassion for other sentient beings Many historians claim he was a vegetarian. I believe this is kind of true, he was a pescotarian (he occasionally ate fish); but whether this it is or not, the point is he had a clear connection and affection for his fellow creatures. I’m not suggesting just because he may have been a veggie that therefore he was a good person; but this was a man of compassion and that he recognised the importance of compassion in society. He had so much affection for his German shepherds (picture above with his beloved dog). He banned all animal experimentation, recognizing it to be evil. Hitler could see the connection between all life forms. It was his level of consciousness. Respect for nature, animals and human life.
—Well... The problem is that nature is usually harmless. I doubt if Hitler loved typhus-carrying lice.
4
He tried to prevent the destruction of his fellow Europeans Numerous occasions Hitler tried to warn and assist his fellow brethren about the Jewish trap they had fallen for and who really was behind all the warmonger. He dropped fliers from planes trying in vain to prevent Germany and Britain fighting. He initially wanted to make alliances with Britain. Many occasions he gave opportunities to opposing European forces, where he could have slaughtered them. It was his internal spiritual angst for him to be fighting (defending) amongst his European brothers and sisters. He did all he could to avoid war, he was not the warmonger we all have been led to believe.
—It's true he tried to prevent war. Or at least that's what he said. Unfortunately for that view, his speeches are consistent with soft-pedalling Jewish activities, as I pointed out earlier. The whole thing could simply be acting, keeping Germans on the boil, while failing to name any warmongers in any detail.
5
He cared passionately about his people and German heritage Hitler observed the degrading machinations of the Jews in Austria and Germany. It not only disgusted and angered him, but saddened him to see how these two nations were being destroyed from the inside out like a cancer—a cancer that his sleepy folksmen could not see. The exact same angst those of us who are Jew-conscious find ourselves in. He was a man who cared about society, a man who cared about culture, who cared about nature, about moral values and about building and improving as opposed to destroying and degrading. He was a man who had fought for his country, in the trenches and been hospitalized for his country. How many of our sell out politicians today can claim that? He was a true spokesman of the people, for the people who had diligently worked his way up from grass roots. From microcosmic pep talks to his fellow workman on building sites, to talks in beer houses, to speeches in basements, to town halls. As well as all the behind-the-scenes work and risks. Slung in jail, mocked and defamed. Endless tireless work to resolve the destruction of his peoples. I would also strongly suggest he cared about all peoples. Yes, including black people, despite the kosher myth he was a supremacist racist.
—Opinions of his oratory vary, but unfortunately many orators have had the gift of persuading listeners that they were on the same side and had a lot to offer. Much of early Christianity, after the Jewish takeover, and after the necessary violence to force its acceptance on reluctant populations, sounded similar to your encomium. But it's now known that Jews, partly because of their psychological reliance on lying, can easily persuade masses of people to act against their own interests.
6
He was a humble man, from a humble background Can any of us name one present western politician who can claim that these days? No, today they’re all criminals, fed through the kosher criminal system. All built on materialistic gain and kudos. All content with serving the beast for their demonic and self-serving interests. Their greed and hubris having no boundaries. Hitler worked on building sites as a laborer for crying out loud. How many of these leaches under the guise of politicians do you know have that background? He was also a humble street artist, barely scraping a living together. Some days he had to decide whether to spend his meager earnings on a political book, or to eat—he opted for the former. Now that is passion in politics and a drive for social reform.
—Investigation suggests that (like Marx, and Lenin) he wasn't from a humble background at all. And nor were his associates.
7
He held correspondence with Mahatma Gandhi This alone doesn’t necessarily suggest he was a good person. But more that Gandhi and Hitler were in alignment on many issues. They both recognized the evil force they were up against and both were coming from a humanitarian position. The bottom line is Gandhi would not have corresponded with a so-called evil mad dictator hell bent on wanting to kill the Jews and rule the world.
—On Gandhi, and Nehru, see 'JoshG'’s piece mileswmathis.com/fakir.pdf which includes in passing a lot of detail on the City of London and its ancient inter-group tax dodges and profit-making, which, significantly, were left alone by William 'The Conqueror'.
8
He was a man of God Hitler was NOT an atheist—despite what the Jewish propaganda machine wants us to believe. He often made references to God and spoke in terms of a Divinity. He was somebody who could clearly make the connection between Divine law and Natural laws. He was spiritually and morally driven throughout all his political career. Read his book
Mein Kampf to see his consistent reference to Christian values.
—The problem is that Roman Catholicism is itself a Jewish movement, injected into the West, and later the East, and it is a ridiculous primitive cult of god shagging a 13-year old virgin and producing a 'redeemer/ saviour', and the rest of the nonsense. Same with the Protestantisms. It is not 'divine law'. (Here's my overview of the takeover of early Christianity by the Jew 'Jesus' fake. It took some centuries.)
9
He implemented cultural and social reform Throughout Hitler’s political career, his common theme was about ‘cleaning up’. He had seen the filth the Jews had created and desperately wanted Germany to reverse these degrading trends. He banned supermarkets, because he wanted local small businesses to prosper. He banned degrading modern art, as he recognised it for what it was. He banned vivisection (animal experiments), because in his wisdom he could see how futile and unnecessary they were. He encouraged healthy youth activities and social programmes to enhance cultural pride and individual self worth, such as sports and recreational activities. He encouraged men to be men and women to be feminine. He helped develop beauty, cleanliness and pride back into the Germany people.
—This is true, and of course worlds away from Stalin. But it's not proof that he wasn't ultimately part of world-wide Jewry. WW2 was degrading to British morality, also, but afterwards there was a reaction against it, but that doesn't prove WW2 was a good thing.
10
He stamped on usury This subject links in most of the points in this list and what Hitler achieved as a leader. But I thought it was essential that this topic was highlighted in isolation, as it was probably the single most important act of bravery and compassion Hitler offered to his people. Unfortunately this act alone was enough to piss off the Jewish IMF and therefore create WW2. Usury is the elite Jews most powerful and demonic weapon amongst their whole armament of destructive weapons. More powerful than their poisons and even their mind control techniques. Because it’s their use of compound interest that enables them to create a stranglehold on every industry
and therefore every level of society. Nobody can escape usury—everybody is infected by it. That is why Hitler created his own independent currency as a first move when he came to power. And hey presto—that is why Germany was able to get back on it’s feet and flourish as all nations should. Hitler recognised the judaic invention of usury as unlawful, ungodly and unnatural—and as a talmudic curse which has crippled every host nation the Jews have entered into and ultimately, that which brings about their demise. Hitler freed his people of this curse.
—Usury is not as important as commentators, notably Roman Catholics, claim. See section 4, in the previous Q/A.
But an important point, supporting the idea of secret Jewish money infusions into Germany, is the simple fact that Germany flourished, like an area of plants suddenly fed on the correct fertiliser. Many experiments with foreign investments, some malicious, some less so, in (for example) Africa, have shown how unusual this is.
Because he was one of the good guys. —Really?
Bernt Busch:
Important Note: Busch (as far as I know) leaves this question open: Was the 'shadow government' in Germany in contact with Jews worldwide? This is a different view from the opinion that Germany had its own shadow government. My best guess is that of course it was in detailed communication with all Jews, in the USSR and USA and elsewhere. This is the traditional Jewish working practice.
There’s no doubt that Hitler was an agent of the shadow government. He came to power only because he was their hand-picked agent. His initial success was miraculous and inexplicable and this by itself should raise suspicion. Of course, the intention was to make him universally popular and to create a superhuman hero who would in the near future accomplish the restoration of German power. H. made his soldiers swear allegiance to his person, "Führer, Volk und Vaterland, "Führer" first, a thing a responsible leader with good intentions for his people wouldn’t do.
I’ve just finished reading a 300-page account of a German WW2 torpedo fighter pilot, late Bodo Diemer, who flew and survived 18 missions on convoys over the Atlantic and the Mediterranean. He and his crew had to use WW1 model torpedos which proved unreliable, while German war industry had had by this time developed a torpedo that would have been adequate, but inexplicably it didn’t go into production, he found that out in the final days of the war. The plane he piloted was outdated, too, too slow and with poor manoeuvrability, too. So figure this: Soldiers were not given latest weaponry to fight with, that again proves your point.
Yes, German youths and British pilots shared the same fate of having to kill and getting killed, and all of them wanted to do their duty and defend their respective countries. Diemer and his crew were tricked into blind patriotism and love for the jewish Führer from their early years, of course the most gullible time of life, he talks about that in the book. To Diemer it was a "kill and win or die and lose" thing. When war was over he found himself in the unexpected situation of having lost the war and being alive. He says that H. prevented long-term development of weaponry, here again a case for intended sabotage of the German effort could be made. I looked up a German general’s account of the war and found nothing particularly suspicious about the battles around Kiew, Henry Makow has remarked that, too, though, and written an essay on it. First battle of Kiew was in Sept. 41 when Germany was advancing, which on the whole was a success, and the other was in Nov 43 at a time when it was only a question of time the war would be over. That general explained that H. alone prevented the attack on Moskow in Sep/Oct 41 which was the obvious strategic prize then and instead had troops relocate from the central front to the north towards Leningrad to join forces with the Finnish allies and to the southern front, only to be returned to the central front when temperatures had already fallen to minus 30 in late Oct 41, that was an inexplicable strategic mistake against von Brauchitsch’s expertise and the advice even of his own immediate staff.
(1) I don’t know. That general seems to believe that German troops may have been able to take Moskow, anyway this was the obvious thing to do, throw forces into Moscow before reinforcements would arrive. (2) Moscow is the communications, especially railroad hub. I don’t think they believed they could have captured Stalin and his gang. The general didn’t say that he believed taking Moscow would have ended the war. I don’t know if they had set up a base further east just in case. If the whole thing was staged that wasn’t in the cards anyway. Also, winter was approaching. I think the two wars are two parts of the same war, Maybe WW1 was ended too soon and hadn’t accomplished what it was meant to accomplish. I think it is possible H. had doubles. I’m sorry I mixed up Kiew and Kursk. I will look that up.
I looked up the chapter on Kursk in that general’s book on the war (Kurt von Tippelskirch), there are 2 pages and a map. There was a Russian inroad into the German front around Kursk, similarly to the north a German inroad into the Russian front with Orel in the center, also 200 km in length and maybe 150 km in depth, so the front in this section formed an upside down "S". Both dents were in danger to be encircled and destroyed. Generals advised Hitler to go ahead quickly with Kursk but H. hesitated saying he wanted to wait for the latest model of Panther tanks to arrive and take part in the operation. Finally the operation started on 5/7 with attacks coming from Orel area to the north and the north-east from Kursk, and from the south-east. On 11/7 Russian troops started attacking the bulge held by the Germans around Orel so that German forces taking part in the cutting off operation towards the back of Kursk had to be withdrawn to be thrown against the Russian forces on the way to the railroad track towards Orel. Operation Kursk proved a disaster, 100.000 soldiers getting killed or wounded and 3000 tanks being lost, and the bulge around Orel held by the Germans was taken by the Russians and the front shortened. The general believes that through this operation the Russians took the strategic initiative on that front away from the Germans. By the time the operation on Kursk started the Russians had already amassed troops on the Orel front, so their incursion was to be expected. It was becoming obvious that balance of fire power had shifted in favour of the Russian military
...
I agree absolutely ! German intelligence must have known that Russian forces were building up on that section of the front and that an attack on Orel area was imminent when they started their operation in the back of Kursk. Hitler kept trivialising the strength of the Russians and dismissed intelligence on Russian capacity and strategy, even after Stalingrad disaster, which, according to von Tippelskirch, was caused by Hitler’s "Starrköpfigkeit", his stubbornness and blockheadedness. I believe WW2 was staged like the plot in a drama in the theatre. It lasted 6 years, Hitler’s messianic Aryan "Reich of 1000 years" lasted 12 years, January 33 - January 45, leaving aside the disastrous final months. Completely jewish. "6"th Army of General "Paulus" was destroyed in "Stalin"grad, the turning point in the war on the Russian front, is that by coincidence ??
...
Paulus was the Pharisee who converted to Christianity and his teachings became vital to Christian theology afterwards. According to Christian myth, he was beheaded, destroyed for his teachings. General Paulus’s army was destroyed, just like the Christian martyr was destroyed. It could be seen in the context of jewish sentiments on Christianity, destruction of the followers/soldiers of Paulus in both cases. Allegedly, Stalin fought the Tsarists in the town that was afterwards named after him, in 1918 or 19. Defeat of the Germans in Stalingrad would associate the name of "Stalin" with military victory. I don’t think Joachim Hoffmann intended to write false history. Why did Hitler attack Russia and fight an unwinnable 4-front war, there must be some rational explanation to this. If we favour the theory that the war was scripted, then Hoffmann’s theory covers only one part of the story, that of Stalin, and misunderstands Hitler’s intentions. Both parties were preparing for war and both must have expected war. The story as I know it is that Russians had amassed troops to attack Germany, that’s what Sowurov says. Germany was then forced to launch a preemptive attack. That attack on the forces gathered near the border turned out to be a stunning defeat for the Russian side because they were not ready to switch to defensive action : I can’t believe that story, they must have had intelligence weeks in advance. I think it’s more plausible that Russian forces were meant to take a severe blow so that German troops could advance into Russia to the extent they did. Eustace Mullins said that Stalin had a nervous breakdown when he got news that German troops were invading Russia and that from then on the Russian military was controlled out of the American embassy. There is that rumour that there was a tunnel from the Göbbels bunker, to the bunker of the American embassy which allegedly remained staffed through the war years. I cannot verify these things. But if that was so it would be a piece in the puzzle and the war being orchestrated out of the American embassies in Moskow and Berlin.
...
"Russia" was jewish, as much as "USA" was, "USA" started as a colony of the Bank of England, it has always been a jewish-masonic base. "Britain" had been the world’s base of finance since 17th century. "Germany", the Reich, was a jewish base at least from the 1870s on.
...
The genuine nationals, the normal goyim, are the victims of jewish/masonic machinations. If I say "Russia" in the context of this war I mean the Russian war machine. To identify exactly the jewish hand in it is not an easy thing, History would be so much easier if it was. If it is factual, as Eustace Mullins stated, that the Russian war machine got its directions out of the US embassy, then the question could be: Was the embassador jewish, was key staff jewish, or were they perhaps proxies of the jews, doing their bidding, or masonic brothers ? Once the understanding is established that the jewish network is a/the major player in politics it may then be of minor importance if key people have a jewish background, it could even be a distraction to spend much energy on that. Is Angela Merkel jewish ? I would say, of course she is, but is it so important ? What if she wasn’t would that throw a different light on her policies ? She gets her directives from the jewish lobbies, that’s what matters. I do appreciate your putting your finger on the jews, I congratulate you on that. You have an opinion on John Kaminski, I learned a lot from him about the tribe.
Oh, well, yes, maybe he is. John believes H. was an enemy of the jews and was trying to destroy them, He has a blind spot there, apparently.
Additional Questions, which may or may not be serious: possibly from a German who lived when Hitler was intensively promoted
(May 2018) [ Top of page ]
1.
If he knew he was Jewish, he would have killed himself sooner. He brought up Otto Weininger in one of his conversations as the only "decent" Jew Eckart knew.
—In view of constant lying by Jews and their allies, this will only convince Hitler worshippers. You sound as though you were brought up in Germany, and kept the views of the time, without revision.
2.
His family tree by Alfred Konder. Miles Mathis misrepresents Hitler's genealogy.
—You don't say anything about Mathis' supposed 'misrepresentations'. Konder's book is online and looks to me a rehash of a 1937 book, and with no Internet checking. It includes (e.g.) a description of Hitler's suicide, which may or may not be accurate, but presumably shows Konder wants to follow what may be the NSDAP line. Mathis' paper is Hiller.pdf with a further paper on Jenny.pdf, Marx's Jewish wife. Mathis states: ... For further proof of my thesis here—that all the Nazis were crypto-Jews—you may consult my newer paper on Marx's Wife, where I found mainstream Jewish researchers admitting in top newspapers [sic!] like the London Telegraph [=Daily Telegraph?] that around 140 top Nazi officers were Jewish, including at least two field marshals, fifteen generals and 23 colonels. In at least 20 cases, known Jewish officers were awarded the highest Nazi honor, the Knight's Cross. Given the current version of history, how is that possible?
3.
He had a private religion/philosophy which explicitly rejected Judaism in all forms. I've devoted two years to studying the worldview in all it's essentials. Hitler is simply consistent across-the-board (Mein Kampf, speeches, letters, memoirs, diaries, interviews, private conversations, private notes).
—This is from the start of David Irving's Hitler's War http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Hitler/2001/HW_Web.pdf:
I would .. warn against several works hitherto accepted as 'standard' sources on Hitler ... particularly those by Konrad Heiden, the Abwehr/OSS double agent Hans Bernd Gisevius, Erich Kordt, and Hitler's
dismissed adjutant Fritz Wiedemann. Professor Carl Jakob Burckhardt's 'diary' .. in his memoir,
Meine Danziger Mission ... is impossible to reconcile with Hitler's actual movements; while Hermann Rauschning's ... Conversations with Hitler ... has bedevilled analysis of Hitler's policies ever since it was published by the evil propagandist Emery Reves... The list of such spurious volumes is endless.
David Irving has also cast some doubt on the true authors and/or editors of Mein Kampf.
It does seem possible to me that there may be a propagandist change in the way Jews treat the NSDAP and Hitler. They might invent new lies; there seems more toleration of Hitler, which I attribute to their allowing for people who cannot believe Hitler was an agent. The DVD The Greatest Story Never Told may be tolerated because it shows German-Russian wars, and, though it shows Hitler's speeches, doesn't go into detail on Jewish behind-the-scenes crimes. I see Miles Mathis thinks David Irving is Jewish or crypto-Jewish; he does not consider Jewish activities.
4.
Unlike Churchill, who one-sidedly attacked Marxist Jews and was a Zionist, Hitler viewed all Jews as a threat. Hitler explicitly rejected Zionism in his writings and private conversations.
—Churchill said many different things. He also edited his own record to try to look more acceptable. The 'Haavara Agreement' would seem to show Hitler working with Jews.
5.
Hitler had acquired a perspective comparable to Goethe and Nietzsche. These three were no doubt geniuses and embraced Hellenic ideals. What was the emphasis on a healthy body and the emulation of ancient Greek/Roman bodily training but a restoration of those times? The maxim "god helps those who helps themselves" occurs in at least 13 of his speeches and also in the Table Talks. In
The Wonders of Life, Haeckel identified it as a maxim of modern hygiene.
—I'm not sure how seriously you mean that. Very many classicists, professors and so on read philosophical works with no noticeable effect. NB I think Nietzsche's main thrust was to talk about heroes, great men, stirring individuals—but the intention was to hide the fact that unimpressive Jews collaborate secretly in large numbers. Thomas Carlyle did much the same in Britain.
6.
Hitler professes a belief in monism in his Table Talks (Oct. 24, 1941), backed up by a speech he made in Sept. 6, 1938 (can be verified in the German translation).
He also affirms certain Pythagorean teachings (Table Talks Sept. 27-28, 1941, Oct. 14, 1941, Nov. 20, 1941). In two speeches, he employed the title "Lord of the worlds" over "Lord of heaven and earth". It's no coincidence that he praised not only Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler, but also Ptolemy.
—So what, little is known seriously of Pythagoras, and the Greeks did not have modern social problems.
7.
He is overall pro-science (once again, across-the-board) and explicitly rejects Jewish-Christian mysticism in the aforementioned September speech.
—You use Jewish-Christian as though that makes sense, but they are different traditions. One is subservient, taking up, or being forced to accept, mental habits to harm them, designed by malicious planners from the eastern Mediterranean.
Exchange with Jan Lamprecht of historyreviewed.com
Gedempte_Fleisch Thanks Rae. By the way, I know you and that you are not a jew and are on our side. Just back away from the anti-Hitler nonsense (as Carolyn Yeager, Jan and others have encouraged you to do) and then we can advance our best interests together.
Jake I appreciate people have a lot of psychological investment in Hitler as the supposed opponent of Stalin, Jews, etc. Unfortunately there's abundant evidence by now that Jews controlled Germany just as much as the USA, USSR and UK and no doubt India and China. The best writer on this known to me is hexzane527, nickname for a Frenchman (as far as I know).
Here's his material (I reformatted it on my site) https://big-lies.org/hexzane527/index.html though I suppose it could be clearer.
My own version is [this file] https://big-lies.org/how-master-race-won-ww2/index.html where the 'master race' means Jews, who won WW2.
Jews encourage Hitler worship, as hexzane notes in his articles, and that's the reason. NB Hexzane has worked out a likely scheme by which Jews are planning WW3. It needs analysis, not just indignation.
Gedempte_Fleisch Thanks Rae. I could paste Carolyn Yeager's reply when you said something similar on The Occidental Observer. It was basically about priorities in our fight for survival. There is a time for speculation such as yours but it is not now.
Concerning WW3, for the past ten years, based on my assessment of many factors, I have told people on websites that I expect (a) WW3 in 2024, before the end of summer, most likely in August and (b) economic collapse, civil war, and JWO before then.
If we survive, we can chew the fat about intellectually interesting topics concerning Hitler and more. After taking care of their basic needs, survivors will have much to talk about.
I couldn't relocate Carolyn Yaeger's comment, but I'm certain it was just another evasive exercise. I have an online talk with Deanna Spingola, another unrevised Hitler supporter.
Jake I don't agree with much of your opinion, unfortunately, because misunderstanding Hitler means misunderstanding the entire modern world. If Jews between themselves arranged WW1 and WW2, then WW3 would be to establish greater Israel, kill off whites and other rivals such as Chinese, and leave a lot of retards - just the way Jews think they want it.
Hexzane's guess on WW3 is https://big-lies.org/hexzane527/2016-05-10-ww3-explained.html and whatever happens he does his best to see through the BS, just as ought to be done with WW1 and WW2. Unfortunately Jews have such media control, to all countries and audiences, they can spin different stories for all of them.
But of course I presume we agree that good analysis is needed - we've seen since 1914 and before whites killing each other and we have to try to consider how to avoid this fate (if it is a fate)
Jake You seem to assume - like most people - that wars are between national groups, with alliances and so on. In fact, Jews and their collaborators form another, separate group.
You can see from South Africa, that its opponents were Britons controlled by Jews (such as the 'Labour' Party); and Americans controlled by Jews; and Russians controlled by Jews; and many more, so that at any time it's difficult to know who's opposing. What's probably needed is a major person from each bank, eg a Rothschild, in high-security jail for the duration of the war or longer, subject to the death penalty if they assist the enemy. (Or something like that). Without it, as you know, whites are liable to lose. And so are others, since Jews put themselves first.
Some Other Replies to Believers in Hitler as a Definitive German anti-Jew–
• Hitler's speech in Germany, deciding to bomb London following Churchill, [1941 'Appeal to Reason'] talked about the long-term supposed British policy, of balance of power in Europe, says nothing about Jews: in the Bank of England, and other countries, including the USA. He might have announced war on Jews, in fact. But he omits all his supposed concerns about Jews.
• David Irving states that in all his archival searches, he found Hitler, when in power, helped Jews, rather than the reverse. Hitler's speeches before he became Führer are anti-Jewish, but may be misleading.
• Irving also says (blurb to Hitler's war—incurring much wrath from some— FROM the third of February 1933, when he told his generals in secret of his ultimate ambition to invade and conquer the East, to the third of September 1939, when he left the Berlin Chancellery for the Polish front, Adolf Hitler had one obsessive goal - to wage war and achieve German revenge and hegemony. It was, as the world knows, to be a war that would leave forty million dead, lay waste most of Europe and half of Asia, and destroy the Third Reich. This sort of thing led e.g. Miles Mathis to have doubts about Irving.
• Jews controlled the USA, USSR, and much of Europe, even China. They had full control of weapons movements and imports/exports and gold and money. They could direct weapons wherever they wanted. With their communications control, they must have had full detail, including loans etc.
• Jews also had spies; eg Bletchley Park had numbers of Jews, and most of the employees lodged outside the Park.
• Jews had media control, outside Germany, to a suffocating degree; a few dissenting voices got out, but most didn't. And if they did they were vulnerable—see e.g. the Kent-Wolkoff affair.
I don't have information on the control of German inter-war propaganda, such as the sales of Mein Kampf, spectacular rallies, Riefenstahl's films, and the Berlin Olympics. But they may have had Jewish input. It's possible that the relatively feeble presentation of Germany overseas had some Jewish collaboration.
On Leni Reifenstahl's Triumph des Willens (translated into English as Triumph of the Will) it took me some time to identify an oddity. Jews had been assassinating leaders for years, and murdering common people in Russia and other countries. Is it credible that Hitler could have been secure ion the streets of Nuremburg? I'd suggest it's indirect evidence that the Führer was collaborating with Jews.
• It's unlikely Hitler would have been set up without Jewish support (and in fact he got it)
• A Talmudic Jewish principle is to kill goyim and to steal. I'd suggest in fact the 'phoney war' and 'Nazi-Soviet Pact' had the function of allowing both Germany and USSR to arm sufficiently to maximise deaths of whites
• An absolutely vital fact—which I have never seen mentioned—is that Jewish archives have not ever been open. It's impossible to know where they shifted money, and what terms were made; that is, if they even committed them to writing. This is a huge gap. In effect, Jews made up a belligerent country, but information has been kept secret. The 'Cold War' continued the process, though it's clear now it was mostly a Jewish international scheme.
• Another absolutely essential fact is that Britain was bankrupt—as early as 1940!—before war had even started! The Jews controlling money must have had plans to take over assets of the Empire. Probably Britain was allowed to limp on before the assets were transferred by Jews, under cover of the 'Independence' of ex-Empire. At the same time the 'Commonwealth' people, hundreds of millions of them, were given the 'right' to move to Britain!
[On Churchill and his 'doleful news' of Britain's bankruptcy, I think in Irving's Churchill's War. Part II: World War December 1941 – August 1942 Note that it seem unlikely that such a huge scattered varied empire could be assessed at short notice. More likely, surely, is the Jewish overview of the entire picture. One would guess that huge loans might have been made, repayable over a century or two, in traditional Jewish style. Probably Jews decided to build up the USA and drop Britain, leaving Churchill to announce his very tame account. That is to say, Churchill might as well have announced Jews were not going to finance Britain after the war.]
Some people noted that Hitler did not aim to start a dynasty, and must have been selflessly devoted to Germans. But of course, if a Jew, Hitler would probably have viewed himself as part of the Jewish 'master race' and in effect felt part of that dynasty.
If Hitler was a Jew or Jewish agent ... raises issues.. SA killings .. plot against Hitler.. jews in Germany not mistreated, distributed thru the country... Sefton Delmer (Jew from Hungary) claimed to know all top 'Nazis' personally ...
very little about most things, including warfare, weather, and everything else.
Tasters -- P.R. Masson and Burge Jensen — Hitler's Policy Is a Jewish Policy (correspondence
with a Jewish publicist), K.R.P. Publications, Liverpool, about 1941
1946 or 1947: an Australian, Eric Butler, published a pamphlet The International Jew, which I can't find. Butler said that Hitler was himself a tool of the conspiracy, seeking to further the international dispersal of Jews.
Even mainstream history admits the Battle of Marengo was used immediately for a major propaganda campaign.
Marengo was mythologised in an army bulletin and three increasingly glamourised "Official Reports" during Bonaparte's reign
.
Tales were invented about the Guard and the 72ème demibrigade, which had been under his direct control throughout. Napoleon needed the victory to cement his Consulate, keep Louis XVIII in exile, and keep allegedly hostile generals (Schérer, Joubert, Championnet, and Moreau) at bay. It is highly convenient this battle that he needed above all else materialized so quickly and took so little time to achieve.
Which brings us to the final way we can tell it never happened. If the overall story of Napoleon's rise were true, he could not have afforded to leave Paris. The last thing a new dictator wants to do after a coup d'état is leave for an extended campaign, taking his troops with him. This would just be asking for his enemies to seize power while he was gone. Someone in Napoleon's position would have needed to remain in Paris, huddling all allies and troops close to him.
Miraculously, after this fake battle at Marengo, Europe suddenly hit a stretch of peace. I guess the history writers developed a case of writer's cramp after all the fiction they had written in the past two decades. In 1802, Napoleon faked another election, making him First Consul for life. He again got
over 99% of the vote. To raise money to pay his writers to compose future fake wars, he sold the Louisiana Territory to the US for $15 million.
In pursuit of that goal, these writers immediately faked a major assassination plot against Napoleon by General Moreau, sponsored by the Bourbons. In response, Napoleon ordered the arrest and death of Duc d'Enghien. To make this arrest and death the pretext for upcoming wars, the arrest was purposely carried out in the most illegal manner possible, kidnapping the Duke from his home in Baden. The way we can tell the whole event was faked is that the trial was a secret military trial and the Duke was allegedly shot in the moat of the Château de Vincennes and buried there. We have seen similar misdirection many times, as when the conspirators against Lincoln were allegedly tried and hung at an Army arsenal, with only soldiers in attendance as witnesses. The conspirators, too, were said to have been buried just a few feet from the scaffold. It is not done that way. If it is illegal to kidnap living people, it is equally illegal (and pointless) to kidnap corpses. Normally, they would be returned to their families for burial. If Napoleon had really killed the Duke, he would have no reason to hide the body.
He could easily have returned it to the Bourbons. Nothing was achieved in the story by stealing the body. In fact, it would have made more sense to guillotine him publicly. So why bury him in a moat?
Because it was faked.
We saw the same thing with Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht, who made an appearance above and in my paper on the Beer Hall Putsch. After they were murdered by the Freikorps, their bodies were hidden. Why? Because there were no bodies ...
After watching interviews and videos with Benton Lawrence Bradberry, 1937-2019, whose book The Myth of German Villainy was I think self-published on Authorhouse in 2012, it's obvious that he accepts the traditional view of the 20th century wars, namely that the USA, Britain, Japan, Russia/the USSR, Germany, Italy and the rest were all independent units, making their own decisions. What is surely clear is that money, since 1913 a cheap paper-money fraud run by Jews, has overridden nations and covertly taken their assets and arranged the politics in what they think are Jewish interests. Bradberry calls himself a serial reader, but of course cannot read books on secret Jewish funding of weapons, supposed leaders like Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler. His book is tolerated by Jews (it's on Amazon) presumably because it fails to attack the Jewish presentation of those two main wars, plus many others at the time.
Capt Kenneth Roderick McKilliam (as far as I know—his fans give little background) wrote a number of booklets, and also longer books, though publication and biog details are scanty. Two of his booklets, which have been reset and seem not to be originals, McKilliam-High-Treason.pdf and McKilliam-how-WW2-came-about.pdf.
There are several problems with McKilliam's work. The first is his Biblical emphasis on what is a Jewish set of writings. Britain has had several incursions of Christianity, including the Protestantism brought over by the Dutch in Cromwell's war. Arguably, this is not a British tradition. The next problem is his view of the Second World War: McKilliam, like most people, thinks the essential war was between Germany and must of the rest of the world. He does not seem to consider the conflict of interest amongst Jews, despite this being an interest of his. His work reminds me of Lady Birdwood's.
GERMANY'S WAR: The Origins Aftermath & Atrocities of World War II by John Wear, perhaps published in 2015, is on sale in Amazon—a sign it's likely to be Jewish-approved. Atrocities in other American wars are still censored by Jews. I haven't found much information on John Wear. A website wearswar.com (started 23 March 2021; I think stored in Tokyo) seems to have been set up for book sales, perhaps wary of Amazon striking at them. But there seems to be no attempt to factor Jews into the world wars, in spite of their control of most of the world's money. The site has a photo of the well-known Rothschild—though the photo must be years old by now.
SOME MORE ONCE-PROMISING REVISIONISTS
Clinton Richard Dawkins (yes, his real name!) has ancestry including Jews at the Treaty of Versailles. He might have been well-placed to investigate human parasitic subgroups, perhaps reworded. Or the long-term best practices for human partners. Or races. But such possibilities seem unlikely now. As far as I know, he's said nothing bout 'COVID'; not much output for a person supposedly helping people to understand science! 'Lord' Robert Winston is a similar type, never rising above his orthodox Jewish upbringing. Steve Jones is another such. This could have been science revisionism. A fascinating other example is Alice Roberts, who is/was a member of the Humanists (see e.g. South Place), and, in Birmingham, 'Professor of Public Engagement in Science'. It's clear from her public announcements that she has no idea about Jewish activities, notably funding since 1913. And no idea of worldwide science corruption. I wonder if she'll learn, on the principle of thinking for yourself?
Nick Griffin, David Irving, Kevin MacDonald are a different revisionist type to these other relatively minor authors. Respectively a one-time Party leader, a world-famous author, and an academic in the wilderness of US Universities, in my view they have faded, and this is something of a warning; don't expect much.
Nick Griffin seems to have settled into a new activity, of co-authoring books. There seems to be an attempt by Jews to reinflate their Christian offspring; I see the same in Russia, where Putin, a shameless and disgusting liar about the 'Great Patriotic War' and the holocaust fraud, seems to be lending support to supposed Russian Orthodox persons. Griffin seems to be supporting (in effect) the Crusades, being of course opposition to Islam without mentioning its Jewish roots and Jewish immigration policy. The C of E has of course been ruined by Jewish money power, just as after Cromwell Protestantism was supported by Jewish money. I doubt Griffin will notice the split between Roman Catholics and Protestants by Jewish money. Anyway, don't expect much. Griffin probably doesn't even count as a revisionist; his aim seems to be to ally with Jews.
David Irving likewise seems not to be a revisionist; he has never answered the Hitler-as-an-agent question. Nor has he researched the money payments from the USA to the USSR and Germany and UK and France. His books seem increasingly "irrelevant" in the 1960s sense.
Michael A Hoffman II showed promise as a close student of the Talmud, combined with interests in true history. He may have shown how Talmudic principles were applied in practise, and thereby revised much of human history, casting new light on more than 2,000 years of wars and damage. But he seems to be trapped in a mire of Roman Catholic absurdities, which he is unable to survey and analyse. For example, he's impressed by 'usury' but seems unable to see how Jews and Catholics, and Jews and Moslems, may operate symbiotically. Another example is the different attitudes of peoples to words: Jewish deception goes deep, in contrast to non-Jewish attempts at truth. Another example is his non-translation of Johann Eisenmenger's two-volume Entdecktes Judenthum. I doubt he will do much good work from now on. Sigh.
Kevin MacDonald became well-known before 2000, with his trilogy on Jews. But his latest book, 25 years later, is entirely concerned with vague genetic material, rather than power politics. His Occidental Observer site recently had an email from someone who mentioned Jewish generals in the USA, without any detail. Eisenhower and Wesley Clark appear to be two examples. As far as I know, the first mention. MacDonald is part of the Reset after WW2, and appears to be pitifully naive: his site has a piece on rapes by Muslims, by an author who seems to know nothing of rapes by whites during and after WW2. Since his trilogy, he has said nothing on the Holocaust fraud, on 9/11, and on psyops in the media. He doesn't seem to know of Jews splitting Christianity. His site's blogroll is partly omissice, partly outdated.
All very sad. But remember, even the most pioneering of thinkers left work undone, which presumably they might have completed. So all this is par for the course.
If you are new to Jew research, and possibly don't believe it—and you will have been lied to, all your life—you might like my long and detailed chronology of Jew activities. Here, below, is a table of replies to people indignant at the idea that Hitler could have been a Jewish agent surrounded by Jews. Note I'm saying a 'Jewish Agent': not an American agent, not a British agent, not a Russian agent, not a Polish agent, or any other evasion: I mean a Jewish
agent.
[ Top of page ]
JIM CONDIT JR from his site targetfreedomusa.com
What was Hitler's mindset regarding the nazi zionist connection?. I'd lost track of Jim Condit Jr, but have to quote him here: he seems to have been one of the first, at least on Internet, to broach the possibility of Hitler as a Jew supporter. I've emboldened a few points. Note that his video has been removed many times.
Click to see (on this site, not to be removed) Adolf Hitler: the Final Solution by Jim Condit Jr. [Long; 2 hr 22:23]
Here's the same video, more or less,
with three title pages at the start, which outline the new version of WW2. Jim Condit has two other online recordings: one with Spingola and Carolyn Yeager (ruined by shrill interruptions by the women) and another with Christopher Jon Bjerknes (who turns out to believe 2M Jews died in WW2). However, Condit's evidence is much the same - I don't recall a single new source of evidence.
His 2003 tape is largely concerned with Zionism and 'Nazis', rather than the issues of World War and covert Jews. And also with Jews in Russia as starting-point of attack against Europe: Ukraine, Poland, Hungary. Condit includes Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini (not France or England). Stalin as a 'Bonapartist'; the predicted attitude of the Jew media of the west, correctly saying they would rage against Germany, but not against Stalin, invading Poland. Condit puts the story back to Bismarck; but also a mention of the Jewish 'Nasi'. Rothschild, Warburg, Schiff, Bernard Baruch and the rest are referred to as "super-criminals". I intend to list his sources here, but it's a long job.
In my opinion, going far beyond Condit,
WW2 was organised by Jews, networking in secret in many capital cities. They had sufficient power to control the USA (think 'Federal Reserve', WW1, Versailles, Depression, Crash); Russia (USSR was Jewish; Technology from USA and Europe went there, 'paid' in paper). British Empire controlled by Jews. French and Germans infested by Jews. As you can see, Condit is mainly concerned with German Jews, and pressures by rich Jews to move them to Palestine. Wider revisionism was for the future.
This [Dec 23 2014] is the first in what will be a series of posts on Target Freedom USA [Condit's website] regarding the Nazi-Zionist Connection - focusing on objections that are made to the thesis.
Those reacting negatively against the Nazi-Zionist connection article are assuming three things that do not apply to this debate.
-1. They are looking at Hitler's speeches / table talk / etc. and taking the parts of those speeches which sometimes incisively and eloquently express truth, such as his criticism of the Jewish power structure in his day, and failing to contrast Hitler's complete body of actions against those parts of Hitler's speeches. As Nixon told some of his critics circa 1968, after he was elected President, “Watch what we do, not what we say.” I took Nixon to mean that he said what he would like to have happen, but he did what political circumstances and pressures dictated was possible.” This applies to Hitler, perhaps. But Hitler also seems to have the characteristic of some half-Jewish people I've met in my life (and particularly one half Jewish person I know) - when they speak up for your side they are the MOST ELOQUENT person in the room or the arena - but they can easily slip into other frames of mind, or even the opposite frame of mind, a few weeks or a year later. Is it proven that Hitler was part Jewish? No - because Hitler and the entire establishment on all sides have put up a wall of stonewalling and secrecy around Hitler's lineage - and that goes for Hitler, too. (Hitler tried to hide his lineage, just like Clinton's secretary of state Madelyn Albright did in the 1990s - do you do that?) Establishment historians, especially establishment Jewish historians, skip nervously over the subject of Hitler's grandfather, when they are forced to address it. HOWEVER, the preponderance of the evidence indicates that Hitler was part Jewish, and perhaps part Rothschild, because his grandmother was working in the Rothschild mansion in Vienna, Austria when she was impregnated. This from the official Austrian government report under Dollfuss circa 1934, confirmed by one time Hitler body guard Koehler, and one time Hitler banker, Thyssen. Rabbi Marvin Antelman offers testimony in volume 2 of his book, “To eliminate the Opiate” - that Klara Pohlzl, Hitler's mother, was at least part Jewish. While those items have come to light since my video was released in 2003, much more on this is covered in the Video, “The Final Solution to Adolph Hitler” located at the top of the Nazi-Zionist page, in the Hidden History section of TargetFreedomUSA.com -
-2. They seem to think that I am unaware of, or denying, the meteoric rise of Germany's economy between 1933 to 1939 under Hitler. This was probably the most dramatic rise of a national economy in human history. The industriousness of the German people together with Hitler issuing money properly along the scientific lines of the Social Credit system (Social Credit system, not a socialist system) made this rise possible. I am fully aware of this, accept it completely, but this reality in no way refutes the idea that Nazism, when all is said and done, was another Zionist operation, and arguably the most clever and effective one of all time. Germany was humiliated deliberately after WW I at Versailles. Then Hitler arose at the champion of Germany to redress all the grievances. The German people were - after that - willing to follow Hitler anywhere; and they followed him into, so far, 69 years of national slavery (in many respects) enforced by the top Jews running the USA since 1945. A few years ago, Germany was forced to donate a nuclear submarine to “Israel”.
People in Germany can be, and have been, and are - put in jail for questioning any of the many wild and sometimes absurd claims of the Hollywood version of the Holocaust. A few have called Hitler “Rothschild bait” for the German people. I think this is essentially accurate, even though I think the evidence shows that Hitler was not happy about this at all times, and tried to alter the course of history planned by the top Bankster. However, his attempts at times to alter the Rothschild game plan, ultimately failed.
However, in the matter of letting the British go at Dunkirk (a first in the history of warfare), and in the case of ensuring the death of the key German regiments once they were in trouble in Russia in, I believe, Operation Barbarossa - it looks like the top Nazi command at both times were selling out to the Rothschild agenda.
-3. Many seem to think that I am trying to diagnose Hitler's mindset at any given period, or even claim to be able to read Hitler's mind. This is not the case. For instance, Pat Buchanan's recent book, “The Unnecessary War”, demonstrates that Hitler was doing everything he could to stop World War II right as it was about to begin. At the same time, the Jewish-Lobby controlled press (many of the largest mainstream outlets) in the West were decrying “The Phony War” - because they wanted to see the bloodshed of Christian white men killing Christian white men get under way in earnest. The late, great Dr. Paul Reznowski, the researcher who provided me with most of the research in the top two videos on our Nazi-Zionist connection page - told me that (paraphrase), “If you see how hard Hitler was trying to stop World War II right before it started, then you will see why people like Hitler.”
Here is the progression of Hitler's mindset, as far as I can tell:
- 1919 - an ambitious, part Jewish man looking for his place in the world, believed that Russia was going to roll west to the Atlantic ocean, and conquer all of Europe in 1919. In fact, the Polish people miraculously stopped the Russian army at the Vistula River, ruining Communist chances to take over Europe in that generation (to borrow what was said in the 1989 Encyclopedia Britannica). When that happened, the Communist governments in Munich, Germany, and Budapest, Hungary, and several other cities collapsed. - The Communists had taken over these isolated cities in anticipation of handing them over to Lenin's Communist troops' in their anticipated march across Europe to the Atlantic right after World War I. The Jews running Communism in Russia felt they might be able to overrun all of Europe right then, as Europe was exhausted by World War I.
Problem for Hitler apologists: Hitler was working for the Communists for six months in Munich, acting as the go between from the top Communist-Jews then running Munich - to the soldiers in the barracks. The testimony of Otto Strasser to Douglas Reed in 1953 trumps all recent attempts to explain this period in Hitler's life away. One person debating me on YouTube said, “Hitler needed a rest.” How about resting without working hand in glove with a Communist government? There is no explanation too absurd when blind Hitler-bots are trying to explain away the Nazi-Zionist connection.
- early 1920s - Hitler saw his future in NATIONAL Socialism instead of INTERNATIONAL Socialism, and became one of the leaders vying for control of the NAZI party. (By the way, Jewish strategist Moses Hess outlined and envisioned International Socialism (eventually called Communism), National Socialism (eventually called Nazism) and Zionism circa 1825-1850 - and he said all would be used to conquer Christian and European society, on the way to Jewish world control.
- 1929 - Hitler made a deal with the top Rothschild related banksters, and accepted the equivalent of $100 million dollars in today's money, thus getting himself in an arrangement to get into power and then to help get as many everyday Jews as possible down to Palestine for the eventual planned takeover of that territory. In the beginning it was incentives, in the middle and end it was roundups. How do the Hitler apologists explain that IBM, based in New York City, landed in Berlin during March, 1933, Hitler's first month in power, to start cataloging the everyday Jews in Germanic territories on IBM punch cards? Were the average Germans demanding this? OF COURSE, NOT! It was the Rothschild Banksters who could pay (a willing) IBM to help carry out the master plan to found Israel where Palestine then was. By the way, the Jews-in-the-know, who new the overall game plan, NEVER CRITICIZED IBM for helping Hitler, as far as I know, even when Hitler was giving Thomas Watson, President of IBM, public awards for his help to the NAZI government. Also, in that same month of March, 1933 - Roosevelt closed US borders to Jews emigrating from Europe. Get it? Get it? The International Banksters and their four front men - were working out a plan far above and away from the view of the everyday citizens across the world.
- 1933-1939 - Hitler figured out, or was taught, or a combination of the two, how to issue money properly, against goods and services available, and goods and services available in the near future. The combination led to Germany's phoenix-like rise economically and militarily. In this period - Hitler, going from 43 to 49 years of age, felt that he could run the future of the world better than the Rothschilds, and did not want to be ushered off the world stage.
After he made his famous pact with Stalin (huh? - you should be saying), Hitler invaded Poland from the west, while Stalin invaded Poland from the east - virtually simultaneously. When Hitler saw that the western press only attacked him, but didn't mention or attack Stalin for doing the same thing, - Hitler knew he was the odd-man out of the four Rothschild front men (Hitler, Stalin, Churchill, Roosevelt), and he began to try and divert and postpone World War II in many ways. It was especially at this time that Hitler was trying to divert the Rothschild program into a peaceful and more sane direction, as the Jewish Banker Walter Rathenua tried to do after World War I - and he was murdered for his trouble on the way to work in his limousine in 1922 in Germany.
- 1940 - at this time Hitler tries to show the (Jewish-dominated) Clivedon Group in England and the Rothschilds that he can “play ball”, by letting the British go at Dunkirk, instead of capturing them and ending the war with England on the spot (which was not part of the script, you understand). The excuses given for Hitler throwing the German victory at Dunkirk are beyond ridiculous. For one thing, you would have to think he had forgotten his own speeches about how the Rothschilds and the organized Jewish forces controlled England - since he decided to give them their military back! - Why didn't Hitler complete the capture of the British military at Dunkirk, and then help patriotic English leaders take back the government from Churchill and the Rothschilds, and THEN let the captured English military men go back to England?????
- 1941 to 1945 - Whatever Hitler was thinking, he seemed to sell out at key points, such as the disastrous policy adopted once so many German soldiers were isolated in Russia.
There is now no question that Hitler escaped the bunker, and did not die there. We now have the memo found in the Truman Library by author Jerome Corsi,- which contained Stalin's plea to Truman to help find where Hitler was, as Stalin did not know. The memo was dated 1946. This refutes the doctored archives released by the Soviets at the “fall of Communism” circa 1991, which represented that Hitler shot himself in the bunker, with the release of long-shot pictures to prove it. This is in Jerome Corsi's new book, “Hunting Hitler: New Scientific Evidence that Hitler escaped Germany.”
Can you imagine Stalin having proof of Hitler's death, and maybe Hitler's body - and failing to tout this Soviet victory to the world right away? Preposterous.
Please watch the admittedly lengthy videos at the top of the Nazi-Zionist page in the Hidden History section at TargetFreedomUsa.com - without this background information and analysis, you will have to leave whole chunks of World War II lying on the side of the road, unable to make sense of them. Also, see Lenni Brenner's “51 Documents” of Nazi-Zionist cooperation, and Ben Hecht's 1961 book, “Perfidy.”
In summary, Hitler's speeches that spoke truths, the economic recovery “and beyond” engineered by Hitler in Germany from 1933 to 1939, and Hitler's last minute attempts to stop the beginning of WW II - do not refute nor negate the information regarding the Nazi-Zionist connection. There were deep connections, financial and otherwise, far from the view of everyday people everywhere. I take my hat off to the late Dr. Paul Reznowski for spending decades of his life, as he had time between his full time career as an M.D. and anesthesiologist, piecing together this hidden side of World War II.
What seems to be lost on the Hitler apologists is that once you recognize that the top Jewish Banksters funded the NAZIS and demanded the round up of the everyday Jews into the camps, then all the evidence, true and false, that has been used against the rest of mankind, - is now OUR evidence against the top Jewish Banksters, both then and now. The pretext for the “external guilt trip” which the organized Jewish Shadow Government has tried to impose on mankind - is over. That evidence, both true and false, is now proof of the deceitfulness of the organized Jewish Shadow Government, and an indicator of how such trickery must be exposed and refuted. You may be playing a game of checkers, but I assure you that the top Banksters who mightily helped Hitler to power - are playing a long term game of chess.
We must explicitly state that the Jewish-Bankster engineered “Holocaust” against its own everyday Jewish people during WW II - must not cow us from opposing and dismantling the present tyranny that the top Jews today are trying to impose upon America and the world. With that said, there were no gas chambers; the idea that Hitler was trying to kill every Jew in the world, or even every Jew in his inner circle, such as his cook, lawyer and doctor, - is beyond preposterous. (The Jews and others who perished and were seen in the pictures as the allies liberated the concentration camps - primarily consisting of people who had died or were dying of starvation and disease at the end of the war in the concentration camps as the Allies bombed the railroad tracks which went to the camps.)
Next post will have specific comments on attempts to refute the Nazi-Zionist Connection thesis, which have appeared on Facebook in the last few days.
Jim Condit Jr.
Concentration Camps - the Truth [ Top of page ]
The bombing of supply lines to Auschwitz must have been planned. They knew the camp held many Jews. This was towards the end of the war. Probably therefore they must have arranged time for Jews to murder or starve non-Jews, with the supplies being sufficient for the Jews, who would then make up their lies and get ready to show bodies in time for their press releases on 'Liberation'. Nothing else makes full sense.
It's difficult to be even approximately correct as to numbers. But if there were (say) 50 camps with 2000 Jews average, that's 100,000 Jews in protected environments. Estimates of the number of 'camps' go into the 10,000s. Auschwitz alone allegedly held a total of more than 1 million prisoners.
Here's a recent short video on Auschwitz, made from photographs, postcards, and letters, showing the building and operation of the camp. The unspoken idea seems to have been to make Jews comfortable and unbombed. Even the head-shaving may have had the purpose of disguising 'Rabbis'. The camp brothel has puzzled some observers. However, this is consistent with Jewish attitudes to women, and Jewish attitudes to homosexuality.
The phrase 'concentration camp' may have been chosen to reflect Concentration Camps of the Boer War. It would have been politically difficult to call them 'Jew Protection Camps', wouldn't it.
Testing the Hypothesis that the NSDAP was Jew-controlled by Looking at the way Hitler is Discussed Now [ Top of page ]
Nearer the start of this piece, I'd tried to describe How most people see WW2. A list of varied names included Montgomery of Alamein, David Irving, various Russians discussing Germans, Hilaire Belloc, and Dennis Wise of The Greatest Story Never Told, all of whom adhere to the model of the Second World War, personalised as nations, and ignoring Jew finance and ownership.
Arguably, the Jewish force for nations was simply to get a few leaders in an area that could be plausibly presented as a 'country', rather than have large scattered numbers. It's perhaps the same process that led city states, barons, principalities to accept monarchs. I suspect the part played by Jews in the rise of nationalism, when it was new, was motivated by Jews wanting to get more control. Mazzini and Italy illustrate the way propagandist forces operated. Earlier, the Staes were united; and later, Germany was unified. The Führerprinzip presumably was analogous, and intended to make one man, whose acting skill was sufficiently good, more or less unchallengeable. Plus the same thing with organisations such as banks.
It's important to realise this is the opposite of Jewish policy: the real power (the Rothschilds and others) keep a back seat, or rather a secret area as anonymous as possible. And they network together in large numbers, something other groups have not yet been able to copy. Jews always push individualism on others; the last thing they want is solid, organised, secret opposition.
I'm mentioning Hitler, as he gets all the commentary from Jews. The party, the NSDAP, is kept out of sight most of the time. And of course this is true in Jew media, the BBC, and the junk turned out by broadcast media onto the unfortunate US victims. I'll try to comment on both aspects in Germany.
Hitler (and Mein Kampf - my review) have been vilified for years and difficult to get in German and in translation. But there seems to have been a change in the last few years. In 2017 and 2018 accurate books on the massive Jewish lie of the 'Holocaust' were banned by Amazon, probably the world's biggest dealer in books. And there is frantic promotion of bogus museums and other rubbish. So it's clear that Jewish lies are running at full power.
And yet Hitler is being permitted: 'Dennis Wise' on The Greatest Story Never Told has not been prosecuted, and in fact seems easier to get—copyright issues being perhaps soft-pedalled. Why should Jews decide to go easy on Wise's DVDs?
I was interested to see a book by Gerard Menuhin being plugged. One important issue is reparations against Jews for war crimes and for the fraud of the 'Holocaust'. I've only read descriptions of Menuhin's book, if indeed it was written by him and not some Jew committee, but it's clear there is no discussion of these serious issues. In other words, it's just another fraud. Its theme appears to be that Hitler was right for Germany; or something like that. (I suspect Jews promote their own in music: Yehudi Menuhin, Mark Knopfler, 'Bono', and Larry Adler illustrate the sort of thing).
[Added 23 Nov 2019: Menuhin's book isn't very easy to buy; for one thing, Amazon has banned it. There seem to be at least two titles: Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil: Recognize the True Enemy and Join to Fight Him and Tell the truth & shame the devil: as told to the author by a little old man in a plaid shirt. I found, but lost, titles of the three main sections of the book: something like: 1 Adolf Hitler, 2 Jews and presumably collaborators since the 17th century, 3. First and Second World Wars and the 'Cold War'. It's impossible to know without careful checking of the book if G Menuhin has grasped the full extent of world Jewry's activities.]
Just two examples where the hypothesis that Hitler was on the idea of Jews gets indirect support.
What about the whole NSDAP? Experience with other countries' political parties—for example, so-called 'Labour' in Britain—shows that supporting propaganda can allow small groups, both of a few 'leaders' and larger back-room manipulators, to dominate parties.
Jews and Genetics [ Top of page ]
I have to digress here into human genetics and what makes 'Jews' unusual.
- Let's survey the whole of life so far as it's known. Without speculating on the start of life, it's obvious that there must have been eras in the development of life. Presumably it started with some fairly simple growth and reproduction, probably in seawater. The early stages must have vanished, probably eaten by later types. And types must have remained fairly static. Early life must have 'fed' on naturally-occurring minerals and elements and dissolved substances and water and gases. Photosynthesis developed at some point: I've seen it suggested that magnesium, needed for photosynthesis, became fixed in plants; protein musculature needed magnesium for movement, hence the permanent division between green plants and creatures that could move. Once there was sufficient life, the possibilities of living food must have led to food chains and nets.
- As organisms grew more complicated, as indicated by DNA and its precursors, there must have been the possibility of mass extinctions, if such processes failed. In my view, this was the reason for sex, not (necessarily) in the erotic sense, but to average out genetics of living things. At some level of complexity, organisms could reproduce either by splitting or cloning, or by mixing DNA—greenfly are at this level. But complicated organisms, if they share genes, with some mechanism for choosing between alleles, would be more difficult to fail, at a cost of mixing in defective genes. At the dawn of human life, food, plants, and predators obviously existed.
- All this time, nervous systems and brains developed and changed, as did senses. In some way, brains took in information, and learned, and decided what to do. These processes remain mysterious. It's only recently, for example, that such things as afferent and efferent nerves, and hormones, have been discovered.
- Learning has obviously some relationship to the outside world. Any individual creature which (for example) couldn't identify food, or couldn't identify very hot or very cold things, or had some severe sensory problem, would not survive. In such cases, there is usually some obviously faulty structure in the individual.
- The development of language, and written language, sets apart human beings from any other group. As far as I know, it isn't known what prevented other creatures from abstract communication with each other. But this opened a new possibility in evolution. In some learning, there is no obviously correct course for evolution to take. But it's obvious there must be mechanism(s) to allow most infants to survive; if there was a 1 in 10 chance of parents killing a child within one year, hardly any would survive till (say) 12; such a mechanism for control over upbringing therefore must exist over time, even if nobody knows how it works.
There must be mechanisms to reduce cannibalism, since, presumably, most creatures could eat their fellows and get an ideal diet. I suspect some creatures (e.g. magpies) may have evolved from cannibalistic ancestors of the same, or similar, ancestors. This may be part of 'Jewish' reaction structures.
But, if human beings extend control over nature, they presumably become more likely to meet other human groups. When this happens, it's not obviously better to be always friendly, or always hostile; or always hard-working, or lazy; or risk-taking, or cautious; or variable and experimental, or fixed and adamant; or violent, or the opposite; or imitative, or individualistic; or serious, or trite. So groups will drift, diverge, vary in inherited behaviour over many generations, dependent on learning. There may be violent groups, peaceful groups, groups which switch under some circumstances, and so on. To take a possible example, if faces could be read easily—if emotions linked directly to faces—this might work well in a small group; but it could be disastrous faced with rivals.
- The senses—for example sight—feed information to the creature; but what it does with the information is not determined as simply as (say) strength of bone, or oxygen in blood, or ease of movement. It seems Jews are, at the present time in human evolution, an extreme, typically being secretly aggressive, and specifically evolved to home in on, then control and and parasitise, people. To see how instinctive this is, observe Jew propaganda: it is natural to them to have no understanding of creativity—for example, they seriously pretend that Europe was once full of blacks; they are perfectly happy to steer towards a situation like the USSR, where nothing worked and there were perpetual shortages, or Israel, needing perpetual money transfusions, because they seem incapable of forward planning—apart from their special, evolved, secret grasping aggression.
An essential point here is that creativity cannot be genetically determined, precisely because something new cannot be subject to fairly simple rules. The best that can be hoped for is the mixing and generation of novelties, and, with luck, chance genius.
- New Theory on Jewish Mentality and Jewish Logical Limitations: Could This Help Explain Jewish Dogmatic Pig-Headed Lies?
Looking for thousandth time at Jewish comments to Youtubes ... irrational ... dates before logic, primitiveness as with Africans believing in witchcraft and cruelty and cutting out body parts and albinos: .. all the logic has been whites though some attempt by people like Sheffer -- jew adverts -- I've come to think that Jews just don't think logically, but have a scatter gun approach, as in adverts --- we have scatty people with no instinctive worries over lies vs whites, some of whom are logical in their fields. but etc [suggested by respondents on Irving]
-Jewish race or group supremacy plus hate, manufactured or instinctive, against others must be one end of a distribution. Many whites and others must have a similar feeling. Jews probably interbred.
- Giving orders, commands - is there some psychological mechanism on giving orders, a separate mechanism for competence? USSR somejews recorded as saying we try to help the peasants, but still they do not love us - simultaneously with mass starvation in Ukraine
Doesn't seem any guarantee that things will stabilise - maybe jew frantic irrationality plus other races of not much logic or science might overwhelm constructive types. Just look at WW2.
note on money as a behaviour changer: south african writer chap in ww2 paid more to join army/ depression americans paid to join the army - paper money directed to them/ now, Silverstein funds at least one group of 9/11 liars/ large numbers of simple americans and canadians to emit slogans; pres similar to some whites in USSR given relatively high posts in the 'Communist' Party
- Here's a fairly short and interesting suggested explanation of Jewish evolution in the 'Fertile Crescent' in the Middle East. In my opinion, the invention of writing is what allowed rule-books to be fixed. This seems to need inflexibility and some violence to enforce over time: it would be difficult to embed rules for creativity and open-mindedness. Progressive selection for fanaticism, secrecy, hatred of other groups accompanied by the need to lie, concealment, and exclusive interest in power, could develop, and certainly this is what is found in Jews. I've seen it suggested that longevity would be selected for, with accompanying experience in enforcement, hence the gargoyle-like old Jews. And maybe ugliness is selected for, as a token that tribal beliefs are prioritised. And so could dependence on the group be selected.
And note there can be genetic changes under newly-introduced propaganda: the idea that the Khazars had Talmudic views imposed on them would explain how they came to think of themselves as Jews after a number of generations (I can't say how many). Note that genetic changes can be fast: after all, just one generation of black:white mix gives something like a 50% mixture. A Jewish problem would be eradicated in one generation by breeding with aborigines, presumably something that arouses terror in Jewish 'rabbis'.
- The take-away message is that human beings achieved something no other animal could do. Some of them evolved in way to go some way to tame their environments and understand the world. But this opened the possibility of parasitic exploitative hostile races to evolve alongside—necessarily secretive, cohesive, irresponsible, and with carefully-worked out systems of lying and deceit. So far they have been very successful, considered numerically. Whether this will or can continue, I don't know. We might take the US Army as an example: run by an irresponsible and uncreative and censorious clique, mutually completely supportive, but instinctively secure in their parasitic feeling that their group must certainly be right, and endlessly violent. (The second Iraq War is said to have been arranged by about 20 Jews in New York). And ruling over a genetically variable group, from whom many are selected who are violent and unthinking and unintelligent, and who genetically will do whatever they're told in exchange for thrills and crumbs.
• Don't imagine the discovery (or rediscovery—Coudenhave-Kalergi was very anxious that Jews should not be called parasites) of intra-human-group parasitism is unimportant. If you understand the message, you're more aware than most 'thinkers' have been, for many centuries.
Jews as invaders; Jews and Psyops; Jews as a distributed layer; Jews and secret collaborators; Jews as subverters; Jews as the master race; Jews as killers and enemies. [ Top of page ]
Jews as Invaders and Infiltrators
A H Lane's book
The Alien Menace (1928, and 1934. Click here for a
complete copy on my site), written after the First World War, has interesting examples of infiltration into Britain; and Jews networking into Jew projects. These include the media and the first years of the BBC, the academic world (notably history, religion, and physics), the so-called 'Labour Party', Palestine projects, networks of thugs used by Jews, entertainment control, and Jews with false names posing as British. (Here's an interesting little-known example:
suffragettes used as Jew pawns in the lead-up to the 'Great War'). The word 'cosmopolitan' for Jews was in wide use at that time; it means, more-or-less, someone in a rootless world-town.
In the USA, the equivalent was after the 'Federal Reserve', and after President Wilson had been blackmailed into war in Europe, and influenced by the 'Balfour Agreement'. As usual with Jews there are very secret, unpublicised agreements.
Probably it will turn out that Russia, after years of the futile 'Great War', had all the time been secretly given to Jews, who had coveted Russia since Napoleon and indeed funded Japan in war against Russia in 1905.
< Typical group photo taken at random showing whites in mid-20th century Britain. They didn't regard themselves as 'whites'; just British people, who lived in Britain, and had always been British. I only recently realised that a secretive proportion believed themselves to be Jews. Like a concealed intrusion, they perceived themselves as aliens, apart from the host community of 'gentiles'. Same photo, different interpretation.
Examples of disguised Jewish infiltration
'Fleeing from the Nazis' In 1933, the
Academic Assistance Council, a
British organization used to help Jewish and other scholars fleeing from the Nazi regime says Wikipedia.
The AAC placed around 2,500 scholars in academic positions. Probably this was intentional placing of Jews in positions where they could agitate for war, keeping in touch with Jews in Poland, Germany etc. Like the stories of Jews 'fleeing', being 'kicked out' etc, it looks like a planned move.
Note that Jews were NOT all booted out of Germany. There were Jewish enclaves and Jewish military in Germany.
George Galloway as an example of Jew-staged oratory
This is a video of mine, with
George Galloway praising Jews at the Oxford Union. About 1 minute. (Though he failed to mention Jews in the USSR). I haven't tried to check Galloway's family antecedents: it's possible a 19th or 20th century Jew invaded Britain, changed his name, and left Galloway to be raised as a mimic Scot. Galloway, compared with most MPs, is at least a 3-D character: on 1 April 2003,
The Sun, a low-grade Jewish-controlled newspaper, had a front-page headline:
TRAITOR A Labour MP brands British troops 'wolves' and calls upon Arab countries to fight Allies. Galloway's much-YouTubed 2005 Senate hearings may well prove to be a staged phoney—how many public appeals by victims of US war crimes has the senate helped broadcast? How many 9/11 investigations have been broadcast? Obviously, none. If Galloway knows about Jews—including in the Arab 'royal families'—he's keeping it to himself. In 2007 he was in pugilistic menace mode when David Irving was speaking; being an MP, he obviously has assistants who could check up on the 'Holohoax'. Recently, he's been discussing Rothschilds, but now what they own; he said it's a dangerous idea, but did not say whether the danger was from, or to, the Rothschilds.
• Dated 5 June 2020, Galloway or I suppose his media handlers, posted a video on the heavily-censored Youtube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SobezXQTCv0 I haven't copied it) titled 'The Killing of George Floyd'. Of course he doesn't discuss this obvious PsyOp, but he does claim to favour action by the powerless, including blacks and whites, legal and otherwise, half-breeds and otherwise. He does not, in his discussion of the .1%, mention or analyse Jews. This is consistent with being a Jew, and getting enthusiastic about any conflicts between non-Jews. The only discordant but accurate note is his mention of the US military on the street of the US, a 'change from being on the streets of the many countries invaded by the US'. (Or close to that. Omits to mention invasions of Europe, including Jews in Russia and Europe in WW2). Disappointingly, it's just more fake opposition and worthless rhetoric.
Jordan Peterson as a Jew-promoted irrelevancePeterson (b. 1962) of Toronto University's psychology department, in Canada, looks like an undeclared Jew to me: he never mentions Trudeau's anti-white immigration activities; he claims to have studied Nazis for forty years (since age 16?) and 'completely understands them'—a piece of effrontery as the Zündel trials of 1985, 1988 fall within that period; he 'attacks' Islam but never mentions Judaism; he never mentions 9/11 or other Jewish frauds; he has no knowledge of revisionism, and quotes the line that scientists purely search for truth. (Another Peterson was US Secretary of Commerce under Nixon, Chairman of the CFR from 1985 to 2007, and chair of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, among other things, says Miles Mathis).
A scripted YV interview with 'Jew' Cathy Newman was widely publicised, a sure sign it's a Jewish promo job. He's shown as heroic for not bowing down before a ridiculous 'pronoun' decision in Canada. It would be wonderful to see a campaign to insist on 'Mkike' and 'Fkike' as name styles—but don't expect it quite yet. With experience, it's amusing to spot the planted Jew desiderata: Peterson says of course he'd obey a law on pronouns (but he doesn't mention Jews break laws all the time—'sanctuary cities' and 'undocumented migrant' invaders, for example). She mentions allegations about Mao's mass murders, but of course omits Jew mass murders under Lenin, and Stalin, and many others. I think there was a reference to capital punishment—allowed to Jews, of course. She wonders if he thinks women are intelligent, and Peterson says they test the same—apparently unaware that IQ tests are tweaked to remove questions women tend not to like. He reminds me slightly of R D Laing, taking refuge in literary and surreal writings. It's comic how ahistorical he is, something which tends to be a characteristic of opportunistic parasites: he claims the "full spectrum of political beliefs" runs from "conservatism to liberalism."
So why is he being promoted? I haven't read his book effort, but my best guess is that he's part of the anti-white Jewish movement. His book will say: things are gonna be real tough for whites, and progressive positive discrimination will lead to few jobs for whites, and lots of jobs for unqualified non-white academics—as he perhaps illustrates.
Other Apparently Jew-naive YouTubers
The 'alt-right' is a Jew coining which pretends that race concerns are 'right wing', and Jews are 'left wing'. So there's (yawn) juggling with that. 'Millennial Woes' seems to be totally unaware of Jewish issues—a precarious position for anyone concerned with forced nonwhite invasion into white, or once-white, countries. He may of course be a crypto-Jew himself, or anxious to preserve his YouTube income. He is unable to discuss serious issues, as of course are many others. However, people are waking up and, I hope, will abandon the lightweights.
← Miliband brothers or half-brothers. I happen to have photos here; may as well put them in. Typical 'Chosen People' who benefited from mass deaths of other races in wars. At issue in this article is the Second World War, though one of them is reported to be in the USA working for more mass immigration—into the USA, not Israel.
More members of the 'master race': → Richard Dimbleby was a Jew who like many 'worked' on propaganda during the Second World War. He was filmed by the BBC to help launch the 'Concentration Camp' horror story frauds. He was given an official funeral. His sons are still active; name a serious subject, they tell lies. The Attenboroughs are in different media; David Attenborough 'worked' in BBC news, and was part of numerous cover-ups. Let's hope all these sh!ts die soon.
Anthony Salz (from https://big-lies.org/mileswmathis/potter.pdf)
Salz [lawyer]
was the Chairman of the BBC in 2006, having been for several years on the Board of Governors. He is also a trustee of the trust which owns The Guardian newspaper [it has the 'chutzpah' to claim 'independent, investigative journalism']
... he is Executive Director of N. M. Rothschild and Sons Limited. (And part of the 'Harry Potter hoax'). When you find that race crimes in Britain are not reported, that Jewish immigration rackets are not reported, that black serial killers are not reported, that the incompetence of third worlders are not reported, that 9/11 and the 'Holocaust' are not reported, that science fraud is not reported, that spread of dangerous diseases are not reported, that the Barcelona plan to invade Europe with 80 million Africans is not reported, that details of the Budget are not reported, that Jewish-backed atrocities are not reported, that facts about the 'Talmud' are hidden, that fake statistics are reported and fake charities are not—people like this piece of sh!t are the reason.
Gilad Atzmon the silent
is related to Menachem Atzmon, chairman of ICTS, the Israeli firm in charge of security at the airport from which the alleged hijacked planes left on September 11th. He is also related to Mossad operative Tzipi Livni, and Janet Yellen chairman of the Federal Reserve. The late Nathan Yellin-Mor, co-founder of the terrorist Stern gang which was responsible for the assassinations of Count Bernadotte and Lord Moyne, the Deir Yassin massacre and the King David Hotel bombing, was also a relative. It's true that we have no control over who our relatives are, but one would think that with his familial connections he would have much more in the way of information and insight to offer us Gentiles. (Karen T, Dec 2017)
'Professor' Richard Evansmay well be a crypto-Jew, descended from Jewish invaders and with a name-change to a Welsh name. I'm judging by his attitudes and outlook, and consistency in his primacy of what Jews think are Jewish interests over everyone else's. (Michael Howard, 'Lord Howard of Lympne' is a specimen 'Welsh Jew'. The BNP used to have a Jew, describing himself as a 'detective'. And so on.) The issue remains heavily censored, despite the obvious conflict of interest over British and European history.
Clinton Richard Dawkins (My reviews of
Richard Dawkins)
Looks like another; geni.com (family tree site) 'scrubs' his mother's name. He's well-known as an enthusiastic evolutionist—fine by me, as far as it goes, but he omits many important human evolutionary concerns. But he's also anti-Christian, while saying nothing about Jews,using US Jewish 'skeptic' frauds. He's also a theoretical egalitarian, despite his supposed science background, considering blacks equal to whites; he says there's no rational reason for whites not to live among blacks. And his egalitarianism stops with Jewish supremacists. For people who know about science fraud, his scientific credentials are flimsy; he has no idea about cell biology, for example. Unfortunately, DNA and its analyses are becoming part of Jewish science fraud, and there's no sign he'll look into any of it.
Corbyn in Britain another Jew fraudster politician illustrates infiltration. Here's
my article from mid-2016 with brother Piers Corbyn, added mid-2020.
[ Top of page ]
Psyop-induced violence to start others fighting
Jewish procedures as far as I know come from a limited menu of ideas, no doubt from constant repetition of simple Talmudic stories.
Let's think about violence, as a spectator sport. On a small scale, think of cockfights or bullfights. A tamer version is feeding groups of water birds, watching them scramble. Human equivalents include gladiators, in pairs, who presumably fight to the death. Or Africans, each given a car axle, made to fight to the death. More examples include wars, or some wars. Here's a short article of mine
Wars considered as Jewish cockfights. For the people involved, these are very serious; generally there is no easy way out, and generally if there are large numbers, both sides will have been prepared by propaganda, whether true or not. It's a strange experience to talk to people who are proud they 'were there' at some battle, and who seem to have no understanding that their equipment and information were all imposed on them, and were paid for more or less secretly, and could have been changed at any time, by someone deciding for their own reasons to go for something else and issuing an order.
Naturally, control over opinion can make this process easy enough, mainly by simple repetition, over a longish time; at this time, blacks are being fed absurd lies by Jews in the hope of causing violence, which is often successful. This is not surprising; whites behave similarly. Obvious injustices can be controlled to spark hostility: here's 'Peter' online:
Although Germany had pieces of land stolen from it by many countries, including France, Belgium, Denmark and Italy, Germany didn’t ask for any land stolen from it in the west. It appeased its enemies, only asking for land stolen from it by Poland, Czechoslovakia and Lithuania, all in the east. ...
And experience shows that it is easy enough to cause 'displacement reactions'. For example, Jan Lamprecht seems keen on black-white wars after black atrocities in South Africa, forgetting what he so laboriously learned, that Jews caused it.
The Greatest Story Never Told has a lot of detail on Germans vs Russians—but the enemy was Jews, not Russians. Some people seem to think God intervenes, for example in the 'Angel of Mons' during the 'Great War'.
Jews as a hidden, invisible, group or layerJews love disguise: Christianity (when it became established), Islam, Jesuits, Quakers, French Revolutionaries, Freemasons, Bolsheviks, 'Democrats', 'Socialists', Communists, Nomenklatura, Spectre, Common Purpose illustrate the sort of thing. The same sort of thing applies of course in other cases, for example the Thuggee cult. The invisibility is helped by the use of fake names: Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Rothschild illustrate that sort of thing, but these are outstandingly evil—most fake names are picked to blend in with local populations, for low-level activity against the hosts.
Jews as subvertersIn the 1920s, the so-called 'Frankfurt School' of Social Research, consisting entirely of Jews, Was closed. The impression given is that the Jews had no option but move to the expensive town of New York and start again. Probably Jews decided they needed intensive propaganda and moved, with the intention, all along, of using Fed money and other Jewish money to invade and set up universities in the USA. Something similar happened in other countries; the UK was infiltrated with quite large numbers of 'academics', guaranteed to support each other, irrespective of quality.
Jews and Choice of Victims
Do Jews pick target groups for reasons? Or is it mostly opportunistic?—Is a question worth considering. In the Second World War, Jews collectively targeted Germany, but their violence and continual lying suggest that perception of weakness was a trigger. Similarly, Jews made up a collection of stories about Slavs, but the mass-murders and killings by any means—starvation, exposure to sub-zero weather, torture, high explosives—sound more like a herd reaction. Nearer the present day, the well-publicised (in alternative media) lunacy of Barbara Spectre suggest an opportunistic approach to Sweden. This is important in researching Jews: they form loosish alliances for their parasitic attacks. Britain and the USA are modern, big state, examples, and China seems to be a temporary ally. Probably there's a simple rule of thumb.
Jews and repetitionLike mammals or birds or insects that all repeat the same meme, Talmudic material is (if you have time) worth studying, as the common source of Jewish activities. The Holohoax fraud gives abundant evidence that a chanting, herd-like quality of mock evidence is instinctive in Jews.
How do Jews assess 'Goyim', 'Shiksas', and so on?
I tend to think they use a checklist approach. For example, the 'flat earth' promotion may be one way to detect simple, compliant, ignorant people. More questions might be: Was Hitler the most evil man ever? Did Arabs cause 9/11? Is the Bible all true? Is 'reversed speech' useful? What do you think of Pearl Harbor? Are you humbled by the heroism of US astronauts?
Jews and discarding once-favoured groups or individuals
Jew favourites appears from time to time: Cromwell an old example, Stalin and Martin Luther King and Mandela, more recently. Cromwell ended with his head on a pole, Stalin ignored as far as possible. The two 'activists' are now less favoured, after a sound revisionist observation that they were both frauds. Oprah Winfrey and Spielberg are media examples. Sometimes, Jew protéegés rebel and are rejected, Damien Hirst for example. Milo Yiannopoulos may prove to be another. But note that Jewish repetitive support (what Hilaire Belloc called 'booming') can remain more or less forever: consider for example the mythologies of 'Moses' or 'Jesus'. One of the functions of revisionism has to be to reconsider reputations forced by Jews: Einstein is a perfect example; the
'Dreyfus Affair' was promotion for 'Jews' generally, around 1900, the sort of thing that has happened many times. (An Irish version may be the novel
The Moneylender by Joseph Edelstein). Another example is 'Little St Hugh', discarded by the Church of England.
Jews in WW2: their overlooked and undetected aim was presumably to maximise deaths of non-Jews, preferably whites
My working hypothesis is that Jewish policy in the World Wars was to maximise deaths—Europeans, Slavs, with USA, UK, ANZ included, and others if possible—in accordance with Talmudic doctrines—by arranging wars or more simply by directing slaughter.
Harry Truman in the New York Times is quoted in a recorded speech by
Tony Benn, in 1994 at about 7.10 minutes, on maximising deaths of Germans and Russians, by giving weapons to whichever side was losing. I'm not suggesting this is new or original. Benn, intentionally or not, confuses 'socialism' with 'Jewish policies'. And I'm not suggesting other groups are just as useful for profitable disposal. As regards whites, many people now know there is plenty of evidence for the spread of Jewish anti-white policies, often supported by reports by whites who themselves were used by Jews.
I'm not suggesting it was the only policy. Human individuals work, play, and what have you, but rarely pursue an undeviating aim all the time. But human groups can co-operate to enormous effect, and Jews seem to be exceptional in pursuing ends simultaneously. Probably the World Wars had joint ends—killing goyim, war profiteering, arranging territories to be occupied and exploited, and paying some attention to their controlled subordinates.
Before WW2. Russia & USSR | Britain | France | Germany | Italy | Small Countries | Hungary | Ukraine | Poland | USA | Japan | China [ Top of page ]
In the immediate post-war years, hundreds of thousands of important documents pertaining to the origins of the First World War were taken from their countries of origin to the west coast of America and concealed in locked vaults at Stanford University. Macgregor & Docherty
Hanslope Park is guarded by a seven-foot-high chain-link fence, just beyond which is a ten-foot-high fence topped with coils of razor wire. Every few yards between the fences are closed-circuit television cameras and floodlights. Cobain writes, ‘only from the air can the enormous scale of the compound be comprehended, it measures almost half a mile across ... It is a perfect place to bury difficult secrets.’ [33]And bury difficult secrets they have. Cobain describes how millions of files containing top secret British government documents dating back even further than the First World War are kept at Hanslope Park. Some documents which were recently released, albeit very reluctantly under direct order of the Courts of Law, revealed the true horrors of British colonial rule in Kenya and elsewhere in the world. The Hanslope documents are among those which have survived the bonfires.
Cobain described how just prior to Malaya’s independence from Britain, five truckloads of sensitive documents relating to British colonial rule were driven 220 miles from Kuala Lumpur under police escort to the naval base at Singapore ‘and destroyed in the Navy’s splendid incinerator there’. Papers at the National Archives at Kew ‘testified to a worldwide purge of sensitive or damning documentation: there was correspondence that described the laborious burning of papers; there were telegrams from London giving precise instructions for methods of destruction; there were even “destruction certificates”, signed and witnessed by colonial officials to confirm that certain classes of documents had been incinerated.’ [34] Systematic and institutional vandalism aimed at wiping out the truth. Controversial files relating to Britain’s colonial outrag
by Guaporense » 28 Jul 2012, 01:02
The Nominal National Products of the major powers in 1938, in current dollars:
(1) United States: 84.7 billion
(2) Germany: 46.0 billion*
(3) UK: 27.51 billion
(4) USSR: 23.02 billion
(5) France: 16.18 billion
(6) Italy: 8.68 billion
(7) Japan: 7.49 billion
LOTS ON WW1
When Germany surprisingly sought an Armistice to find grounds for Peace in 1918, it was on the basis of President Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points. The myth history here is deplorable. Historians and journalist continue to this day to claim that the First World War ended on 11 November, 1918. It did not. Germany was undefeated on the field of battle. Beaten but not crushed. In a move which has been airbrushed from official history, the Allies, mainly Britain, continued to apply a full and complete blockade of Germany so that for the next eight months hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of their women and children were starved to death. The rise of Bolshevism in Germany became so dangerous that even war hawks like Lloyd George realised that Germany had to be allowed to survive in a much reduced state. Finally the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, never ratified by the American Congress, were so damaging that the causes of the Second World War were literally sewn into the fabric.
WW1: Prolonging the Agony, How the Anglo-American Establishment Deliberately Extended WW1 by Three-and-a Half Years, has been published, ... lays before the reader a vast amount of evidence which reveals how enormously rich and powerful men in Britain and the U.S. deliberately prolonged WW1 while reaping even greater fortunes from it. It retraces the major lies and malevolent propaganda generated in Britain and America to justify war against Germany, and the reason it was prolonged beyond the spring of 1915 in order to crush her.
[New post] Prolonging the Agony 2 The Full Hidden History Exposed
First World War Hidden History
Tue 06/03/2018, 16:06
Respond to this post by replying above this line
New post on First World War Hidden History
Prolonging the Agony 2 The Full Hidden History Exposed
by Jim_and_Gerry
This is the second blog about the recently published Prolonging The Agony.
In a single volume, the real History of how the First World War was deliberately prolonged to the benefit of the charlatans, profiteers, and the Secret Elite can be fully understood.
It is impossible to pick any single scandal above the others, but one which has been studiously ignored by the history boys is the Herbert Hoover and the Commission for Relief in Belgium. This one time American mining engineer and future President of the United States, previously criticised for rampant dishonesty by the courts in London, was chosen by the Secret Elite to head an international fraud which was paid for by the Allies and underwritten by the U.S. government. It claimed to provide food for the exclusive use of the population of Belgium and Northern France which were occupied by the German army.
What we have uncovered is an enormous double-deal whereby not only did food go to Belgium, food that was often sold for profit, but supplies also went to Germany directly down the River Rhine. We know that Edith Cavell saw what was happening. As an avid letter writer whose letters were printed in the Times, she threatened to expose the scandal. This is a story of money, bankers and producers colluding to reap millions from the desperation of a hungry Europe, and in so doing prolonged the bloody war.
Yet another scandal was the complete farce of the Gallipoli campaign. Because the Russians had suffered such vast losses on the Eastern Front, the Czar demanded evidence that war was worthwhile. The promise of Constantinople was the prize which animated him most, and the Gallipoli campaign was concocted by the Secret Elite to make it appear that a serious effort was underway to attack Turkey and win Constantinople for Russia. It was set up to fail. You may think this impossible, but Prolonging the Agony provides detailed evidence that the campaign was an orchestrated farce from start to finish. But it convinced the Russians and kept them in the war. The Secret Elite had no intention of ever giving the strategically vital port of Constantinople to Russia. Ever. The story and the needless sacrifice is a disgrace. Indeed Gallipoli was an outrageous and deliberate failure, but it prolonged the war, as was required. Your reaction to this statement may well be......it can't be true. Please read the chapters on this crucial event. They will make you uncomfortable.
And there could have been peace, several times over. But peace was not on the Secret Elite agenda. When, by 1916, the military failures were so costly and embarrassing some key players in the British government were willing to talk about peace and discuss what that might mean. This could not be tolerated. The potential peacemakers had to be ditched. Lloyd George was promoted to prime minister in Britain and Georges Clemenceau made prime minister in France. The unelected European leaders had one common bond. They would fight Germany until she was crushed. Prolonging the Agony details how the secret cabal organised the change of government without a single vote being cast. A new government, an inner-elite war cabinet thrust the Secret Elite leader, Alfred Milner into power at the very inner-core of the decision-makers in British politics. Democracy? They had no truck with democracy. The voting public had no say. The men entrusted with the task would keep going till the end and their place-men were backed by the media and the money-power, in Britain, France and America. The only end they had in mind was Germany destroyed.
The entry of America into the war changed everything. The money men were covered by the Federal Reserve System. They could print dollars and finance their war in safety. Loans were guaranteed by governments. The American economy was literally underpinned by the war spending, and all on the back of the ordinary citizens and taxpayers. Millionaires blossomed. Poverty for the many grew. Even the election of Woodrow Wilson in 1916 was tainted by doubt. The manner of his re-election is ignored in mainstream accounts. It all hinged on California and the recount was itself tainted with corruption.
We examine the emergence of Zionism as a factor in the political world. From the first years of the twentieth century we have unmasked the close relationship between Zionism and the British and French Rothschilds. The background to the Balfour Declaration shows how far the British cabinet was willing to support the Zionist ambitions for Palestine. This was NOT, as it is portrayed, a simple message from the British Foreign Secretary to the head of the Rothschild family in Britain. It was the product of years of scheming and political pressure that eventually won there backing of the Secret Elite. And prolonging the war here was also important. Before the Zionist claim over Palestine could have any pertinence, they had to buy time to establish institutions and boost investment. The immense duplicity the British government and the connivance of the American administration is explained in full. And it raised serious questions about loyalties.
While the Russian Revolution might appear to have little to do with prolonging the war, it did. Did you know that the last foreign politician to meet the Car before he abdicated was Secret Elite leader Alfred Milner? Co-incidence? What transpired between the two? Milner’s behaviour and report when he returned to London was so strange that one has to conclude that he had much to hide.What promises were whispered to Czar Nicolas before he abdicated? Worse was to follow. The raping of Russia by the money-men who financed the Bolsheviks, links Wall Street to the Kremlin… and of course, since Russia had decided to end the war with Germany, the promise of Constantinople was revoked. For ever. How convenient.
When Germany surprisingly sought an Armistice to find grounds for Peace in 1918, it was on the basis of President Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points. The myth history here is deplorable. Historians and journalist continue to this day to claim that the First World War ended on 11 November, 1918. It did not. Germany was undefeated on the field of battle. Beaten but not crushed. In a move which has been airbrushed from official history, the Allies, mainly Britain, continued to apply a full and complete blockade of Germany so that for the next eight months hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of their women and children were starved to death. The rise of Bolshevism in Germany became so dangerous that even war hawks like Lloyd George realised that Germany had to be allowed to survive in a much reduced state. Finally the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, never ratified by the American Congress, were so damaging that the causes of the Second World War were literally sewn into the fabric.
Prolonging the Agony is unique. It details the lies and malpractice through which an evil war was prolonged. The old order in Europe was swept aside and it shows how the new order emerged from a joint Anglo-American Establishment. It merged the Secret Elite in Britain with the Morgan-Wall street powers through joint policy making by a self-appointed group of ‘right-thinking’ men. We name them. We also acknowledge the impressive work of Professor Carroll Quigley in initially exposing the machinations of the evil men who aimed to take over the new world order.
And then they stole our history. Literally. All of the evidence of the gross malpractice, the profiteering, the lies and the propaganda about the cause of the war and about the running of the war was swept up and taken away from its European roots. All of the pre-war papers and documents which would have shown how far the Kaiser went to try to avoid war, disappeared. The vast quantity of international permits and papers about the running of the American Relief in Belgium, high-jacked. The key Russian diplomatic evidence sold for a pittance was removed to America. Taken under instruction by the organisation set up by Herbert Hoover, it was removed to Stanford University and there what remains of the evidence lies under lock and key. Our history. Our truth. To be fair, our governments also burned, redacted, removed, shredded and otherwise abused the historical fact by destroying evidence of their malpractice and lies. Prolonging the Agony details as much of this destruction of history as we currently know. Breve and persistent journalists continue to push for sight of all documents. Historians do not.
You have to give time to this frank exposure. You will have questions to ask. You will be angered at the waste of life and the selfishness of the rich and the powerful dynasties. You will want to ask again and again how they managed to sweep such a litany of wrong-doing under the proverbial carpet. You will be alarmed at the manner in which we have been lied to; at the stolen history; at the way in which you have been misled. After ten years of constant research and inquiry, we still are.
Prolonging the Agony puts into your hands the awful truth behind a war which could have been brought to a reasonable conclusion in 1915. The cost in human terms of all that transpired from 1915-1919 is so horrendous, that it has been studiously kept from us. Even 100 years later, the lies persist. Read this book. There is much more to it than has been outlined here. Consider the implications. Be angry.
Now available from Trineday Publications in the USA and though Amazon across the world. We are delighted to announce that our German publishers, Kopp Verlag will undertake a translation in German, and our French publishers, Editions Nouvelle Terre, are currently considering a similar decision.
Jim_and_Gerry | 6 March, 2018 at 4:05 pm | Categories: Belgian Relief, Carroll Quigley, Gallipoli, Georges Clemenceau, Herbert Hoover, Kaiser Wilhelm II, President Woodrow Wilson, Secret Elite, Wall Street, Zionism, Zionism | URL: https://wp.me/p4Ic3s-1hT
Comment See all comments Like
Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from First World War Hidden History.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://firstworldwarhiddenhistory.wordpress.com/2018/03/06/prolonging-the-agony-2-the-full-hidden-history-exposed/
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com
• A note on 'unconditional surrender'. Suppose some warmonger wants to insist on obviously unfair conditions. When this happens, it's time for continuing until 'unconditional surrender'. For example, I doubt many people would consider imposing Freemasons a legitimate cause for war.
Conclusion: when people talk of 'unconditional surrender', it may be a sign Jews are involved.
• A note on 'Wars prolonged unnecessarily'. Note this is a 'gentile' idea, taken for granted, without thinking, by many non-Jews. But Talmudic advice is to kill as many 'goyim' as possible.
Conclusion: if some campaign or war is said to be 'prolonged unnecessarily', it's probably a sign Jews want more deaths and profit.
• On the 'Great War' or 'First World War', Benjamin Freedman's A Jewish Defector Warns America (1961 speech; transcribed as about 60,000 words) is a blissfully short, convincing and detailed, run-through of the German experience in the 'Great War'—well worth reading for anyone whose schooling is Jew-only. (Warning: Freedman's speech may be a partial psyop, omitting the Rothschilds and other Jews, omitting terms of weapon loans and repayments, omitting crimes of Jews in the USSR notably mass murders, omitting doubts about Hitler, promoting nuke mythology for mass scares... So keep your critical specs on!)
• After the Great War, a treaty of sorts was imposed on Germany at Versailles. Parts of Germany were awarded to other countries, and usually this is regarded as something negotiated and discussed. In fact, the bits were probably awarded to Jewish landowners, and removed from Germans, Austrians, Hungarians, and so on. Versailles after the war, during negotiations, was notorious for swarming with Jews, typically from the USA, and these would presumably talk locally to Jews, and run rings round the supposed victors.
The general view of the supposed end of WW1 may still be surprise and shock at the ramshackle and dangerous arrangements of the 'Treaty'. How could they take such risks?—Cynics might reflect that this was presumably intentional, paving the way for further Jewish games—after all, the Great War itself showed signs of pre-planning and profiteering—the invention of the Fed, the prolonged newspaper campaigns, the loans for weapons, the sinking of Lusitania (see https://big-lies.org/mileswmathis/lusi.pdf), 'Trading with the Enemy', the sudden unexplained stop of the War.
Note that all the arrangements were subject to Jewish lying, in traditional fashion. For example, the areas lost by Germany amounted (according to Hitler) to 25,000 square miles, which is smaller than Eire, which Britain was supposed to be happy about, when the Marrano Jew‑descended de Valera was put into power.
Conclusion: watch for huge asymmetry in opinions on similar issues. Typical Jewish behaviour is to endlessly cause trouble for what they think are their own ends.
In a similar way, vast reparations were demanded, but they later varied to enormous extents. It's not hazardous to guess the figures and the terms were decided by Jews—and that Hitler's public speeches avoided details.
Conclusion: if a war ends in a tangle of absurd contradictory problematical settlements, and vast money settlements, it's probably Jews at their money-making and war games.
Russia & USSR
[ Top of page ]
Russia in the 1910/1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica (11th edition).
Map including European Russia. Further east, off this map, from the Ural mountains, is the vaster region of Asiatic Russia, extending north of Mongolia to the Pacific and Japan and Korea.
=======================
USSR
1928 1941 1950
Cows 33,2 million 27,8 million 24,6 million
Pigs 27,7 million 27,5 million 22,2 million
Sheep 114,6 million 91,6 million 93,6 million
Horses 36,1 million 21,0 million 12,7 million
According to official Soviet statistics, some 24 million Kulags disappeared from rural areas, of whom only 12,6 million moved to state jobs.
naive people attribute this to 'chasing the rainbow of the perfect state', 'building socialism' ... in fact murder [this is why jews in usa carry out childish false flags to try for disarming whites]
========================
Ostara book blurb:
Der Untermensch (“The Underman”) is possibly the Third Reich’s most famous, misquoted, and misrepresented publication ever.
First issued in 1942 by the SS head office under the direct orders of Heinrich Himmler, The Underman has ever since been portrayed as “anti-Slavic,” “anti-Russian,” and “anti-Jewish.” In fact only the third allegation has any truth to it. The “anti-Slavic” and “anti-Russian” claims are merely the product of postwar propaganda, reliant on the fact that almost no one would have the chance to actually read the publication for themselves.
The reason for this was that after the war, the Allied occupying powers in Germany ordered all copies of the publication seized and burned. As a result, only a tiny handful were saved, and it is from one of these very few surviving copies, that this edition has been prepared.
In addition to its rarity, the text has also never been correctly and fully translated into English (until now), a fact which has greatly eased the task of those seeking to distort what it actually says.
Ideologically hostile Jewish propagandists have, for example, engaged in outright forgery and misrepresentation of its contents, while a single translation made by an ideologically sympathetic postwar publisher suffered from serious grammatical and translation distortion errors.
This edition is therefore the very first complete and accurate translation into English of this 52 page oversize booklet.
Far from being anti-Slavic, the reader will see that the SS Head Office publication portrayed Russians as victims of Communism—and then specifically blamed Jews as being behind Communism, and, ideologically speaking, inheritors of a far older, far eastern attack on Europe which had started with Genghis Khan and the Mongols.
Nowhere in the SS book are the Slavic people denigrated, and in fact many of the traditional Slavic nations are mentioned in text and photograph as being part of the greater European family. European nations specifically mentioned in this book include Portugal, Spain, Italy, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Italy, Switzerland, Slovakia, Croatia, Greece, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania.
The suffering of ordinary Russian people under the Soviet system forms a large focus in this work, and at all times great sympathy is evoked for these victims of Communism: men, women and children alike. Special mention is made of their awful living conditions, inflicted by the Soviet economic collectivization system, and always condemned only as the result of Communism.
In addition, the economics, social structure, art, and even freedom of religion under the Soviet state is dramatically and graphically compared with Germany—and elsewhere in Europe.
Finally, after reviewing numerous Soviet atrocities and Communist secret police torture chambers discovered during the German advance into the Baltic states and the Ukraine, this SS book ends with a dramatic series of photographs showing the murderous intentions of the Soviet state—and a warning that if the European people did not unite and together fight off the attack by the “Jewish-led Underman,” then Europe itself would be destroyed.
========================
(NB Princess Alix of Hesse, granddaughter of Victoria, married Czar Nicholas II in 1894, and was crowned Empress of Russia in 1895. European royalty permitted this type of permeability). 1792 War with Poland.
[ From Oona Craig: Poland was Jew-influenced. The Jews infiltrated the Polish nobility in the 16th century under Casimir IV...the same way the Jewish bankers infiltrated the British nobility under Queen Victoria and Edward VII in the 19th century. (Actually the infiltration of Britain began with the crypto-Jew William Cecil's control of Elizabeth I and her illegitimate children). Many Poles were unaware of the Jewish infiltration of the nobility. The largest Jewish population in Europe was located in Polish-Lithuanian territory. When Catherine the Great conquered Poland, Russia acquired thousands of Jews who had been formerly barred from entering Russia. Catherine tried to prevent the Jews from entering Russia by establishing borders called the "Pale of Settlement." It didn't work. By conquering Poland and absorbing Poland's Jews, the Russian monarchs embraced the time bomb that eventually killed them. Jews assassinated EVERY Tsar beginning with Alexander I, who (like Napoleon) was poisoned. Nikolai I was poisoned (following his successful resistance to the Jew-orchestrated Crimean War). Alexander II (after 14 unsuccessful Jewish attempts to kill him) had his legs bombed off. (Alexander II had angered the Rothschilds by entering the US Civil War in support of Lincoln). Alexander III and family were bombed (not the first attempt) while traveling in the Imperial Train; Alexander held up the collapsed roof of his compartment to allow his family to escape, thereby damaging his kidneys. His son Nikolai II and family were shot. A look at French and American history reveals the same history of relentless serial assassinations of "independent" non-Jew leaders. See: The Red Thread by Andrei Krylienko. ]
=========================
Russia: note on vast wet plains like Poland, Ireland. Unlike European subdivisions. Horses eg cossacks, Polish horsemen, Mongols. 'Primitive communism' idea. Boundary changes: poland huge changes; lithuania even huger. Idea of Jews moving is not unusual.
Note on huge size of Russia: St Petersburg/ Moscow approx similar to Cape Town and Joburg in South Africa with huge lands on other side. Kiev and Minsk further south. Moscow about level with east med.
solzhenitsyn 200 years together (eng trans online at archive.org, 2 vols undated russian 2002
chapter 21 during the soviet-german war
1940 peace offer hitler said he'd withdraw from occupied territories exc traditional germany and wanted permission to invade USSR [churchill provoked bombing "to remain PM"]
• Note the probability of secret agreements, during WW1. The determination to support and recognise the Jewish regime of the rich (see big-lies.org/mileswmathis/lenin.pdf (Lenin was an aristocrat on both sides of his family. His father and maternal grandfather are admitted to be nobles. It looks like they were also crypto-Jewish nobles. ... the supposed 'Russian Revolution', absurd story of the 'October Revolution'...) must have been a collective decision. Probably the huge publicity given to the Balfour/Rothschild agreement was a distraction.
• The Russian Empire itself (like the British Empire) was probably driven by Jews, so that vast land areas had Jews in high positions, ready for Bolshevik mass murders and genocides, though of course anything like a full story is concealed.
Britain
[ Top of page ]
I found a copy of British Way and Purpose, a collection of propaganda papers bound together as a red hardback. Rather infantile stuff presumably aimed at simple soldiers (or maybe simple officers) on (for example) Germany. See below for selected sample pages.
Wikipedia (I know) says there was a Security Assistance Group (created under the British Army 2020 concept) renamed The 77th Brigade in January 2015. Maybe it's responsible for the ridiculous psyops for its Jewish masters.
1937
Mass Observation worth a mention founded after a new statesman piece 12 May 1937 Geo VI coronation survey on that date prob used to check on jew awareness
British Way and Purpose Sir Bernard Pares on Russia [alamo.pdf looks at those recurring names: Pérez, López, Castro, Díaz. Notice anything? They’re all modern-day celebrities. Hip-hop artist Pitbull (born Armando Pérez), Jennifer Lopez, Mario López, George Lopez, Cameron Diaz, etc.
I hardly need mention the most famous Castro, who Miles has already outed. Actually, Comrade Fidel outed himself, admitting his ancestors were Spanish Jews. Fidel’s first wife was Mirta
Diaz-Balart. In his paternal line, going back to the 1700s, we find an uncle Juan Lopez Diaz. We also find a Pereyre, which looks like a fudging of Perez. The Wikipedia page for the surname Pereira confirms this, listing variant spellings such as Pereyre, Peres, Paret, and Pares. And don't forget that Pereira is a variant of Peron, linking Castro to the Perons.
We also read that “many Portuguese immigrants to the United States, especially Massachusetts, chose to ‘Americanize’ their surname to Perry.”
miles mathis hitler2.pdf faked blitz photos, faked portraits
cp Russell's Which Way to Peace? with horrific predictions of deaths, insanity, and range of German bombers. Russell was cousin of Lord Charles Portal (bomber ?command). Despite posing as a pacifist book. Russell never reprinted it.
Which Way to Peace? (my scanning and character recognition).
Churchill by Clive Ponting 1994 [1976 Hoax of the 20th Century, by Arthur Butz. vol 1 Churchill's War 1991] All pre-internet
Note on Irving's books:
1963: David Irving: The Destruction of Dresden (William Kimber Ltd, London)
1963: David Irving: Und Deutschlands Städte starben nicht (Schweizer Druck und Verlagshaus AG, Zürich)
1964: David Irving: Der Untergang Dresdens (Sigbert Mohn Verlag, Gütersloh)
1964: David Irving: The Destruction of Dresden (Holt Rinehart Winston, New York)
1964: David Irving: The Mare's Nest (William Kimber Ltd, London)
1965: David Irving: The Mare's Nest (Little, Brown and company, Boston, Toronto)
1965: David Irving: Apocalissa a Dresda (Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Milano)
1965: David Irving: The Destruction of Dresden (Ballantine Books Inc., New York)
1965: David Irving: La destrucción de Dresde (Fermín Uriarte, Editor, Madrid)
1965: David Irving (transl.): The Memoirs of Field Marshal Keitel (William Kimber Ltd, London)
1965: David Irving: La Destruction Des Villes Allemandes (Editions France Empire, Paris)
1966: David Irving: The Destruction of Dresden (Corgi Books, London)
1966: David Irving: The Memoirs of Field-Marshal Keitel (Stein and Day Publishers, USA)
1967: David Irving: Accident. The Death of General Sikorski (William Kimber Ltd, London)
1967: David Irving: Der Untergang Dresdens (Rowohlt Verlag GmbH, Reinbek)
1967: David Irving: The Virus House (William Kimber Ltd, London)
1967: David Irving: Der Traum von der deutschen Atombombe (Sigbert Mohn Verlag, Gütersloh)
1967: David Irving: The German Atomic Bomb (Simon and Schuster, New York)
1967: David Irving: The Destruction of Convoy PQ.17 (Cassell & Company Ltd, London)
1968: David Irving (with Prof D C Watt): Breach of Security (William Kimber Ltd, London)
1968: David Irving: Die Geheimwaffen des Dritten Reiches (Rowohlt Verlag GmbH, Reinbek)
1968: David Irving: The Destruction of Convoy PQ.17 (Simon and Schuster, New York)
1968: David Irving: The Destruction of Dresden (Ballantine Books, Inc., New York)
1969: David Irving: Virusnii fligel (Atomizdat, Moscow, USSR)
1969: David Irving: PQ.17 Il Convoglio Della Morte (Club Degli Editori, Milano)
1970: David Irving: The Destruction of Convoy PQ.17 (Corgi Books, London)
1970: David Irving: Die Tragödie der deutschen Luftwaffe (Deutscher Bücherbund, Stuttgart)
1970??: David Irving: Die Tragödie der deutschen Luftwaffe (Ullstein Verlag, Berlin)
1972: David Irving: (transl. and ed.) The Memoirs of General [Reinhard] Gehlen (London, 1972).
1971: David Irving: The Destruction of Dresden (Corgi Books, London)
1973: David Irving: The Rise and Fall of the Luftwaffe (Little, Brown and Company, Boston, Toronto)
1975: David Irving: Die Tragödie der Deutschen Luftwaffe (Verlag Ullstein GmbH, Frankfurt/M - Berlin Wien)
1975: David Irving: Ascenso y Caída de la Luftwaffe (Editorial Planeta, barcelona)
1975: David Irving: Hitler und seine Feldherren (Verlag Ullstein GmbH, Frankfurt Berlin Wien)
1976: David Irving: Tajno Orozje (Zalozba Borec, Ljubljana)
1977: David Irving: Der Untergang Dresdens (C. Bertelsmann Verlag, München)
1977: David Irving: Hitler's War (Hodder & Stoughton Ltd., London)
1977: David Irving: Hitler's War (The Viking Press, New York)
1977: David Irving: La Guerra de Hitler (Editorial Planeta, Barcelona)
1977: David Irving: The Trail of the Fox (E P Dutton: Thomas Congdon Books, New York) [in print]
1977: David Irving: The Trail of the Fox (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London)
1977: David Irving: The Trail of the Fox (Clarke, Irwin & Company Ltd., Toronto and Vancouver)
1978: David Irving: The Trail of the Fox (Avon Books, New York)
1978: David Irving: La Pista Della Volpe (Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Milano)
1978(?): David Irving: Rommel. Eine Biographie (Hoffmann & Campe Verlag, Hamburg)
1978: David Irving: The War Path (Michael Joseph Ltd., London)
1978: David Irving: The War Path (The Viking Press, New York)
1978: David Irving: The War Path (Penguin Books, Canada)
1978: David Irving: Hitlers Weg zum Krieg (Manfred Pawlak Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Herrsching)
1978: David Irving: El Rastro del Zorro (Editorial Planeta, Barcelona)
1978: David Irving: El Camino de La Guerra (Editorial Planeta, Barcelona)
1979: David Irving: Hitlers Weg zum Krieg (F.A.Herbig Verlagsbuchhandlung, München)
1979: David Irving: Der Nürnberger Prozess (Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, München)
1979: David Irving: Mord aus Staatsräson (Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, München)
1979: David Irving: Rommel (Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki)
1976: David Irving: Rommel (Drzavna zalozba Slovenije, Ljubljana)
1980: David Irving: Rommel. Eine Biographie (Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, München)
1980: David Irving: The Destruction of Dresden (Futura Publishers Ltd, London)
1980: David Irving: Wie Krank War Hitler Wirklich ? (Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, München)
1980: David Irving: The Destruction of Convoy PQ.17 (William Kimber Ltd, London)
1981: David Irving: Uprising! One Nation's Nightmare: Hungary 1956 (Hodder & Stoughton, London)
1981: David Irving: Aufstand in Ungarn (Albrecht Knaus Verlag, Hamburg)
1981: David Irving: La Guerre Entre Les Généraux (Editions Pierre Belfond, Paris)
1981: David Irving: Konvoj PQ17:s Undergång (Liber Förlag, Stockholm)
1981: David Irving: Insurrection! Budapest 1956 (Albin Michel, Paris)
1981: David Irving: The War between the Generals (Congdon & Lattès, Inc., USA)
1981: David Irving: The War between the Generals (Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd, Canada)
1981: David Irving: The War between the Generals (Allen Lane, Penguin Books Ltd, London)
1981: David Irving: The War between the Generals (Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Milano)
1981: David Irving: The War between the Generals ( Congdon & Weed, Inc., New York)
1981: David Irving: Hitlers Weg zum Krieg (Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, München)
1982: David Irving: Ungheria 1956. La rivolta di Budapest (Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Milano)
1982: David Irving: Von Guernica bis Vietnam (Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, München)
1982: David Irving: Schlacht im Eismeer (Albrecht Knaus Verlag, Hamburg)
1983: David Irving: The Secret Diaries of Hitler's Doctor (Macmillan Publishing Company, New York)
1983: David Irving: The German Atomic Bomb (Da Capo Press, New York)
1983: David Irving: Die geheimen Tagebücher des Dr. Morell (Wilhelm Goldmann Verlag, München)
1983: David Irving: Krieg zwischen den Generälen (Albrecht Knaus Verlag, Hamburg)
1983: David Irving: The War Path (Papermac, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd., London)
1983: David Irving: Hitler's War 1939 1942 (Papermac, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd., London)
1983: David Irving: Hitler's War 1942 1945 (Papermac, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd., London)
1983: David Irving: Adolf Hitler: The Medical Diaries (Sidgwick & Jackson Ltd, London)
1984: David Irving: Hitler's War (Hayakawa, Tokyo)
1984: David Irving: En Konvojs endeligt (Forum, København)
1984: David Irving: Rommel (Hayakawa, Tokyo)
1984: David Irving: Hitler. Les Carnets Intimes du Docteur Morell (Acropole, Paris)
1984: David Irving: Hitlers sjukjournal (Liber Förlag, Stockholm)
1984: David Irving: Schlacht Im Eismeer (Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, München)
1984: David Irving: Los Diarios Secretos del Medico de Hitler (Saned S.A., Madrid)
1985: David Irving: Hitlers Krieg (Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, München)
1985: David Irving: The Mare's Nest (Panther Granada Publishers, London)
1985: David Irving:The Destruction of Dresden (Papermac, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd., London)
1986: David Irving: Aufstand In Ungarn (Wilhelm Heyne Verlag, München)
1986: David Irving: Uprising! One Nation's Nightmare: Hungary 1956 (Veritas Publishing Ltd., Cranbrook, West Australia)
1986: David Irving: Der Morgenthau-Plan 1944/45 (Faksimile-Verlag, Bremen)
1986: David Irving: [autobiographical brochure] Torpedo Running (Focal Point Publications, London).
1987: David Irving: Churchill's War vol. i: The Struggle for Power (Veritas, Cranbrook, West Australia)
1987: David Irving: Göring (Albrecht Knaus Verlag, Munich and Hamburg)
1987: David Irving: Hess: The Missing Years (Macmillan London Ltd, London)
1987: David Irving: The Destruction of Convoy PQ-17 (Richardson & Steirman, New York)
1987: David Irving: Rudolf Heß--ein gescheiterter Friedensbote (Leopold Stocker Verlag, Linz & Stuttgart)
1987: David Irving: La Destruction de Dresde (Art et Histoire d'Europe, Paris)
1987: David Irving: The Destruction of Convoy PQ-17 (Eagle Publishing: St. Martin's Press, New York)
1988: David Irving: Churchill's War vol. i: The Struggle for Power (Arrow Books, Hutchinson, London)
1988: David Irving: Rudolf Hess (Albin Michel, Paris)
1988: David Irving: Hitlers Krieg (Manfred Pawlak, Herrsching, Germany)
1989: David Irving: Hess: The Missing Years (Grafton Books, a division of HarperCollins Publishers, London)
1989: David Irving: Führer und Reichskanzler (F.A. Herbig Verlagsbuchhandlung, München-Berlin)
1989: David Irving: Churchill's War. The Struggle for Power (Arrow Books Ltd., London)
1989: David Irving: Göring (Legenda Forlag, Stockholm) [in print] 1989: David Irving: Göring (William Morrow and Company, Inc., New York)
1989: David Irving: Göring (Macmillan London Ltd, London) [in print] 1989: David Irving: Göring (Rowohlt Verlag GmbH, Reinbek)
1989: David Irving: Das Reich hört mit [history of the Forschungsamt] (Arndt Verlag, Kiel).
1990: David Irving: Hitler's War (trade paperback, Avon, New York)
1990: David Irving: Deutschlands Ostgrenze (Arndt Verlag, Kiel, Germany)
1990: David Irving: The Trail of the Fox (trade paperback, Avon Books, New York)
1990: David Irving: Die Tragödie der Deutschen Luftwaffe (Zeitgeschichte Ullstein Buch, Frankfurt/M - Berlin)
1990: David Irving: The Secret Diaries of Hitler's Doctor [abridged and revöised] (Grafton Books, London)
1990: David Irving: Rommel. Eine Biographie (Weltbild Verlag, Augsburg)
1990: David Irving: Der Untergang Dresdens (Verlag Ullstein GmbH, Frankfurt am Main - Berlin)
1990: David Irving: Hitler's War & The War Path [Updated and revised. Three volumes in one ] (Avon Books, New York)
1990: David Irving: Churchill. Kampf Um Die Macht (F.A. Herbig Verlagsbuchhandlung, München)
1991: David Irving: Göring, a Biography (Grafton Books, a division of HarperCollins Publishers, London)
1991: David Irving: Goering. Le Maréchal du Reich (Albin Michel, Paris)
1991: David Irving: Churchill's War vol. i: The Struggle for Power (Avon Books, New York) [in print] 1991: David Irving: Hitler's War & The War Path [Updated and revised. Three volumes in one ] (Focal Point [London] edition; same as Avon edition, with inclusion of entire annotations)
1992: David Irving: Die Nacht in der die Dämme Brachen (Verlag Werner Symanek, Gladbeck)
1995: David Irving: Der unbekannte Dr. Goebbels [edited transcript in German of Goebbels' 1938 diary] (Focal Point Publications, London) [reprinting]
1995: David Irving: Apocalypse '45. The Destruction of Dresden (Veritas Publishing Co Pty Ltd, Cranbrook, Australia)[reprinting]
1996: David Irving: Goebbels. Mastermind of the Third Reich (Focal Point Publications, London) Click for free download of this book download
1996: David Irving: Goebbels. Mastermind of the Third Reich (St Martin's Press, New York [cancelled April 4, 1996]) [in print] Click for free download of this book download
1997: Nuremberg, the Last Battle (Focal Point, London, 1997) Click for free download of this book download
hitler executed 84 generals
Over half the Waffen SS was made up of non-German nationality. Waffen SS volunteers came from Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, Finland, Croatia, Ukraine, Latvia, Hungary, Spain, and Sweden and from Russians and Cossacks. One force was formed into Der Britisches Freikorps otherwise known as The British Free Corps (BFC). The BFC was the brainchild of John Amery, eldest son of Secretary for India of the British Government, the Rt. Hon. Leopold Stennett Amery, MP.
8 as spook 'numerology' combat 81? 18 etc spooks?
nb possibility that eichmann organised transports of jews to safety
================================
the Zionists wanted this "great USSR horror" to be known about outside of the USSR as being caused by the Jews, as a motivation to bring about this Jewish persecution.
==================================
Hitler's Revolution: Ideology - Social Programs - Foreign Affairs by Richard Tedor 2013
publisher: richard tedor ?chicago
Picture of Hitler and NSDAP. emphasis on reforms - h as town and house planner, volkswagen, domestic fridge, holiday cruisers; not so much Bauhaus, writers, film.
Includes sabotage of war effort by aristocrats.
Unfortunately worthless since it says nothing about Jews. Probably Amazon would not handle it.
=======================
I set out to describe events from behind the Führer's desk, seeing each episode through his eyes. The technique necessarily narrows the field of view, but it does help to explain decisions that are otherwise inexplicable. Nobody that I knew of had attempted this before, but it seemed wo r th the effort: after all, Hitler's war left forty million dead and caused all of Europe and half of Asia to be wasted by fire and explosives; it destroyed Hitler's ‘Third Reich,' bankrupted Britain and lost her the Empire, and it brought lasting disorder to the world's affairs; it saw the entrenchment of communism in one continent, and its emergence in another. In earlier books I had relied on the primary records of the period rather than published literature, which contained too many pitfalls for the historian. I naïvely supposed that the same primary sources technique could within five years be applied to a study of Hitler. In fact it would be thirteen years before the first volume, Hitler's War , was published in ???? and twenty years later I was still indexing and adding to my documentary files. I remember, in ???? , driving down to Tilbury Docks to collect a crate of microfilms ordered from the U.S. government for this study; the liner that brought the crate has long been scrapped, the dockyard itself levelled to the ground. I suppose I took it all at a far too leisurely pace. I hope however that this biography, now updated and revised, will outlive its rivals, and that more and more future writers find themselves compelled to consult it for vii viii Hitler's War materials that are contained in none of the others. Travelling around the world I have found that it has split the community of academic historians from top to bottom, particularly in the controversy around ‘the Holocaust.' In Australia alone, students from the universities of New South Wales and Western Australia have told me that there they are penalised for citing Hitler's War ; at the universities of Wollongong and Canberra students are disciplined if they don't. The biography was required reading for officers at military academies from Sandhurst to West Point, New York, and Carlisle, Pennsylvania, until special-interest groups applied pressure to the commanding officers of those seats of learning; in its time it attracted critical praise from the experts behind the Iron Curtain and from the denizens of the Far Right. Not everybody was content. As the author of this work I have had my home smashed into by thugs, my family terrorised, my name smeared, my printers firebombed, and myself arrested and deported by tiny, democratic Austria – an illegal act, their courts decided, for which the ministerial culprits were punished; at the behest of disaffected academics and influential citizens, in subsequent years, I was deported from Canada (in ???? ), and refused entry to Australia, New Zealand, Italy, South Africa, and other civilised countries around the world (in ???? ). In my absence, internationally affiliated groups circulated letters to librarians, pleading for this book to be taken off their shelves. From time to time copies of these letters were shown to me. A journalist for Time magazine dining with me in New York in ???? remarked, ‘Before coming over I read the clippings files on you. Until Hitler's War you couldn't put a foot wrong, you were the darling of the media; but after it...' I offer no apology for having revised the existing picture of the man. I have tried to accord to him the kind of hearing that he would have got in an English court of law – where the normal rules of evidence apply, but also where a measure of insight is appropriate. There have been sceptics who questioned whether the heavy reliance on – inevitably angled – private sources is any better as a method of investigation than the more traditional quarries of information. My reply is that we certainly cannot deny the value of private sources altogether. As the Washington Post noted in its review of the first edition in ???? , ‘British historians have always been more objective toward Hitler than either German or American writers.' ix Introduction my conclusions on completing the manuscript startled even me. Hitler was a far less omnipotent Führer than had been believed, and his grip on his subordinates had weakened with each passing year. Three episodes – the aftermath of the Ernst Röhm affair of June 30, 1934, the Dollfuss assassination a month later, and the anti-Jewish outrages of November 1938 – show how his powers had been pre-empted by men to whom he felt himself in one way or another indebted. While my Hitler's central and guiding pre- war ambition always remains constant, his methods and tactics were profoundly opportunistic. Hitler firm ly believed in grasping at fleeting opportunities. ‘There is but one moment when the Goddess of Fortune wafts by,' he lectured his adjutants in 1938 , ‘and if you don't grab her then by the hem you won't get a second chance!' The manner in which he seized upon the double scandal in January 1938 to divest himself of the over conservative army Commander in Chief, Werner von Fritsch, and to become his own Supreme Commander too, is a good example.
His geographical ambitions remained unchanged. He had no ambitions against Britain or her Empire at all, and all the captured records solidly bear this out. He had certainly built the wrong air force and the wrong navy for a sustained campaign against the British Isles; and subtle indications, like his instructions to Fritz Todt (page ?? ) to erect huge monuments on the Reich's western frontiers, suggest that for Hitler these frontiers were of a lasting nature. There is equally solid proof of his plans to invade the east – his secret speech of February 1933 (page ?? ), his memorandum of August 1936 (pages ?? – ?? ), his June 1937 instructions for the expansion of Pillau as a Baltic naval base (page ?? ), and his remarks to Mussolini in May 1938 (page ?? ), that ‘Germany will step out along the ancient Teutonic path, toward the east.' Not until later that month, it turns out (page ?? ), did Hitler finally resign himself to the likelihood that Britain and France would probably not stand aside.
These last pre-war years saw Hitler's intensive reliance on psychological warfare techniques. The principle was not new: Napoleon himself had defined it thus: ‘The reputation of one's arms in war is everything, and equivalent to real forces.' By using the records of the propaganda ministry and various editorial offices I have tried to illustrate how advanced the Nazis we re in these ‘cold war' techniques. Related to this theme is my emphasis on Hitler's foreign Intelligence sources. The Nazis' wiretapping and code breaking agency, the Forschungsamt, which destroyed all its records in ???? , holds the key to many of his successes. The agency eavesdropped on foreign x Hitler's War diplomats in Berlin and – even more significantly – it fed to Hitler hour by hour transcripts of the lurid and incautious telephone conversations conducted between an embattled Prague and the Czech diplomats in London and Paris during September 1938 (pages ??? – ??? ). From the time of Munich until the outbreak of war with Britain Hitler could follow virtually hourly how his enemies were reacting to each Nazi ploy, and he rightly deduced by August ?? , 1939 , that while the western powers might well formally declare war they would not actually fight – not at first, that is.
The war years saw Hitler as a powerful and relentless military commander, the inspiration behind great victories like the Battle of France in May 1940 and the Battle of Kharkov in May 19452 ; even Marshal Zhukov later privately admitted that Hitler's summer 1941 strategy – rather than the general staff's frontal assault on Moscow – was unquestionably right. At the same time however Hitler became a lax and indecisive political leader, who allowed affairs of state to stagnate. Though often brutal and insensitive, he lacked the ability to be ruthless where it mattered most. He refused to bomb London itself until Mr. Churchill forced the decision on him in late August 1940. He was reluctant to impose the test of total mobilisation on the German ‘master race' until it was too late to matter, so that with munitions factories crying out for manpower, idle German housewives were still employing half a million domestic servants to dust their homes and polish their furniture. Hitler's military irresolution sometimes showed through, for example in his panicky vacillation at times of crisis like the battle for Narvik in 1940. He took ineffectual measures against his enemies inside Germany for too long, and seems to have been unable to act effectively against strong opposition at the very heart of his High Command. In fact he suffered incompetent ministers and generals far longer than the Allied leaders did. He failed to unite the feuding factions of Party and Wehrmacht for the common cause, and he proved incapable of stifling the corrosive hatred of the War Department (OKH) for the Wehrmacht High Command (OKW). I believe that I show in this book that the more hermetically Hitler locked himself away behind the barbed wire and minefields of his remote military headquarters, the more his Germany became a Führer Staat without a Führer. Domestic policy was controlled by whoever was most powerful in each sector – by Hermann Göring as head of the powerful economics agency, the Four Year Plan; by Hans Lammers as chief of the Reich chancellery; or by Martin Bormann, the Nazi Party boss; or by Heinrich Himmler, minister of the interior and Reichsführer of the evil famed SS.
The sheer complexity of that character is evident from a comparison of his brutality in some respects with his almost maudlin sentimentality and stubborn adherence to military conventions that others had long abandoned. We find him cold bloodedly ordering a hundred hostages executed for every German occupation soldier killed; dictating the massacre of Italian officers who had turned their weapons against German troops in 1943; ordering the liquidation of Red Army commissars, Allied commando troops, and
captured Allied aircrews; in 1942 he announced that the male populations of Stalingrad and Leningrad were to be exterminated. He justified all these orders by the expediencies of war. Yet the same Hitler indignantly exclaimed, in the last week of his life, that Soviet tanks were flying the Nazi swastika as a ruse during street fighting in Berlin, and he flatly forbade his Wehrmacht to violate flag rules. He had opposed every suggestion for the use of poison gases, as that would violate the Geneva Protocol;
---hitler's role in the jewish tragedy [sic] that Hitler grasped quite early on that antisemitism would be a powerful vote catching force in Germany; that he had no compunction against riding that evil steed right up to the portals of the chancellery in 1933; but that once inside and in power, he dismounted and paid only lip service to that part of his Party creed.
=================================
irving on german arms: naval construction. And airforce [in my video]
never anticipated bomb england. short range bombers within 100 miles or so tactical support Denial of Baltic to British naval cp bombers not able to reach moscow
when conquered france and ?belgium,
didn't have right escort fighters
lancaster bomber 'workhorse' 1930s
=====================================
John Sluder - The Germans did not bomb Britains cities first. A group of German bombers flew over London and accidentally opened the bomb doors by mistaking the target. Then Churchill sends British bombers to Berlin at night. Then Hitler retaliated after trying to reason.
rerevisionist - Yes; I think David Irving worked out that sequence in detail. NB it wouldn't surprise me if even that accidental bombing was a lie; maybe the British did that too
rerevisionist
There's a post here saying in effect the Germans aimed at precision - 'surgical strikes' in fact. The idea of mass bombing of innocent people wasn't part of their plan.
Geoff Clarke - The British bombed Berlin first, at night of course, under the order of that drunken Churchill hoping Hitler would retaliate - which he did, giving Churchill a massive propaganda victory; 'See Mr Roosevelt! I told u those evil Nazis would bomb our innocent civilians! Now will u please enter the war!' Irving has exposed that hypocrite
ExVeritateLibertas - If I'm not mistaken Berlin was bombed something like 10 times before Hitler retaliated. And the British histories whine about the little "Blitz" while the Germans had a million air raid victims and every major city in the country razed.
Ingesson's channel
I couldn't agree more. How stupid of the Germans to reject the Me 262 as an interceptor initially. And to disregard the four engine bomber designs out of arrogance. Not to mention the fantastic designs and solutions that some manufacturers had suggested, but were sidelined in favour of the high commands favourites 'such as Messerschmitt and heinkel'.
2
Reichsfuehrer Nivea Creme
The fact that Germany built "the wrong Air Force" is proof that Hitler did not have plans for world domination, which would have required heavy long range bombers. Curiously, the country that claimed to be interested in peace developed heavy long range bombers before there was a need for them. Conclusion: Germany's interests were in self-defense, England wanted to rule the world.
=================================
Anonymous Geoffrey said...
Anon (who)...
"Stalin’s huge armies were in an ideal position to take over Europe, but Hitler guessed Stalin’s design".
Gee I suppose Anon does not know that Stalin was Hitler’s ally. How would Stalin ever have defeated Europe, when he only won WWII at all with huge nonstop aid from the British and the USA? The UK impoverished their own nation for ever so as to help the Communists. The USA and Britain gave Stalin military supplies for free. The British had to pay their US ally, for everything the UK received.
The British war guarantee to Poland would have meant that Stalin would have been fighting Poland, Hitler and the entire British Empire plus the French Empire. The frogs also had guaranteed Poland. I mean if Stalin had attacked Poland without Hitler doing so.
Stalin was not so stupid as to take on so many enemies at the same time. Hitler OTOH [=on the other hand] could never get enough enemies and he loved war on two fronts. He had the British Empire and the Soviet Union against him. That was not enough enemies for Germany so he declared war on the USA. Just after Congress voted not to attack Germany but to fight only the Japanese. Great move, Adolf, a real war winning idea – for the Allies. Hitler got Roosevelt and his jew “advisers” out of a real jam there.
Note to new posters. Do not engage in arguments with Anons, you will end up doing nothing else. This site is a good one for Asperger’s oddballs and full blown Autistics, not so good for mentally healthy people.
4 February 2018 at 16:55
Anonymous Geoffrey said...
Hitler fought the Allies hard in the West so that Stalin would get as much of Europe as possible. The useless Battle of the Bulge is firm proof. Hitler could have fought very hard in the East and cunningly surrendered land in the West. Hitler could have made sure that the USA and Britain got all of Germany and Austria, plus maybe half of Poland or more. Maybe all of Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania etc. Easily.
Hitler’s "logic" was that he would create a division between the capitalist West and Soviet Russia.
He would have done better to upset and undermine Stalin than the West. Hitler was thus, in the end, pro Communist and he proved it.
The Cold War might never have been happened if Hitler had retained land in the East until the end of the War. Hitlers Generals could have fought a defensive war inside the Soviet Union for several more years, if Hitler had allowed them any flexibility of movement, and not starved them of equipment as he had done in North Africa when Rommel was winning.
Also the jew bomb should never have been invented and never used. That is asking too much of the jews. They wanted to drop their Nihilistic bomb on Germany, not Japan.
Probably Britain and the USA could have invaded France in 1943. But they also wanted a Communist takeover in Central Europe – and a division of Germany between (((Commie rats))) and Capitalist rats.
4 February 2018 at 17:10
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Geoffrey said
How about you start (follow your own advice) by listing those Nazi top leaders (not soldiers) who were active Christians.
You made the accusation, so please provide the quotes that nazis made derogatory comments about Christianity.
Don't cop out Geoffrey
4 February 2018 at 17:14
Anonymous Geoffrey said...
Hitler was warned by his own sides Military Intelligence that the Soviet Union already had 20,000 planes against Germanys 3,000. Pshaw said Hitler, bulldust, I know best. Hitler attacked the Soviet Union knowing the odds against Germany were overwhelming. Well done, Hitler.
"Kick the door in and the whole rotten edifice comes crumbling down" said Germanys master strategist and tactician. Guess what, he was wrong. He lost. Germany came crumbling down. Why do so many still admire the liar and loser Adolf Hitler? Study his results and not his magnetic speeches, rallies and so forth. Hitler was an interesting person – but in the end he was a fake like L Ron Hubbard. Nonetheless Scientology lives on as does National Socialism. I think the number of actual National Socialists in the entire world today would be less than the number of antifa in a medium sized country. Nazism is a dead end, it is over, it would be like trying to revive Ancient Carthage – it will never happen.
Mussos Italy was very weak and short lived compared to the glory that was Rome.
Anonymous Geoffrey said...
“The Yalta Conference, also known as the Crimea conference and code named the Argonaut Conference, held from 4 to 11 February, 1945”.
If Hitler had not sacked Guderian and other brilliant Generals, he would still have been deep inside Russia and Ukraine in February 1945. Thus the Allies carve up would have been very different, and that is the point I was trying to make. Many German generals have said that it was Hitler’s personal interference at the lowest level, almost to platoons, that wrecked their defensive war in the East. Had Guderian and von Manstein been given their chance, the war would have ended much less favourably for Stalin, much to his rage and anger at the Western Allies. Stalin got so much at Yalta because Roosevelt was a lying sneak who was disloyal to his Ally the British Empire, and loyal to the mass murderer who he named “Uncle Joe”. The conference should never have been held in the Soviet Union – every room of the Allies was bugged. (Also obviously all the Soviet rooms as well. Stalin was paranoid).
Yes I agree with Chumlees Brother that Hitler lost on purpose and that Stalingrad is one of 20 major proofs. The Battle of the Bulge is another. Dunkirk, the use of jets as only bombers. Etc. facts are facts, and there is no reason to wish or hope that facts were different. Hitler lost the war everywhere, Land Sea and Air, – even the most ardent Hitler fan could not say “that is a lie”.
Always judge peoples actions and not their fancy words. Several alleged crimes are attributed to Hitler wrongly, such as the Holohoax, however the loss at Stalingrad was entirely Hitler’s fault. An immediate breakout to the West would have succeeded while one of Hitler’s best Generals, von Manstein, was already attacking East at the same time and place. Von Paulus should have ordered the break out against Hitler’s orders even though he may have been shot for it. Rommel would have done so, and Guderian also would have done so.
5 February 2018 at 17:11
Anonymous Geoffrey said...
Part 2.
On the plus side, Hitler never killed Guderian whereas Stalin would have done so, probably during 1941 (if Stalin had been Guderians commander). Guderian always told the truth right to Hitler’s face, as would any top Prussian general who was not an ambitious toady. That is why the German Army were winners in wars – the truth was required and not bullshit and arse licking. Until Hitler took too much personal control and went Oriental Potentate himself. Stalin killed the Red Army fighter commander for his answer to Stalin’s question: “What do you need to win the war in the air”. Answer from a future dead man “Stop sending brave men in to the air in flying coffins”. This Asiatic tendency of Stalin to kill all brilliant leaders that told any uncomfortable truth is one reason German generals would have kicked Soviet arse for many years deep inside the Soviet Union, even ten years, had they been allowed to fight a defensive war, giving up land whenever necessary to sucker in the Reds for another trap.
Operation Citadel was another massive Hitler blunder and a very obvious pincer movement. Even “subhumans” could see that coming. Hitler’s entire offensive in the East in 1943 was a bad strategic decision. 1942 was a dud as well, based on results e.g. Stalingrad and no oilfields captured. The Germans should have gone defensive from January 1942, and fought for so long that Stalin would have surrendered some land to end the war. That might have happened. The Germans killed 6 Soviet troops for every German soldier killed. Hitler should have got the Japs to attack the Soviets instead of Pearl Harbour. Had this happened – Hitler would have won the war in the East, which he was determined not to do. Based on what happened.
When Hitler unilaterally declared War on the USA in December 1941 – the Japs gave Hitler nothing at all in return. (No Hitler fan on this site, or anywhere, has tried to explain why Hitler did this and how it helped Germany in any way). So the Nips were also stupid not to work with Hitler from the start and work as a team. The slant eyes unwisely thought that the Reds were beaten by 7th December 1941. Just days before Stalin counterattacked with fresh troops from Siberia. One million fresh men I think it was. They were only free thanks to the Nips Pearl Harbour attack. The Nips and Germans could have shared the Soviet Caucasus oilfields between them and both solved their oil problem for ever.
One of the most obvious propaganda lies of WWII “history” is that the German Army had no suitable winter clothing, and that is why the Soviets beat them. So a country can invent and build jets and rockets, but cannot requisition (grab) winter coats from the civilian population in conquered areas? If not manufacture the coats and boots in Germany itself.
=================================
The strange death of FDR, emanuel josephson 1948 quoted with great approval in Josh G butler.pdf in mileswmathis.com on butler's war is a racket
===================================
roosevelt - dutch banking family? Delano - Italian? Baruch, Warburg etc German? du Pont ?French? Morgan, Spencer etc Scottish? English?
In 1944-1945, President F.D. Roosevelt was manipulated by Henry Morgenthau Junior and created the War Refugee Board (WRB), who fabricated their infamous reports on the German extermination camps -- Auschwitz and Birkenau.
March 2018: bernd busch --- Paulus was the Pharisee who converted to Christianity and his teachings became vital to Christian theology afterwards. According to Christian myth, he was beheaded, destroyed for his teachings. General Paulus’s army was destroyed, just like the Christian martyr was destroyed. It could be seen in the context of jewish sentiments on Christianity, destruction of the followers/soldiers of Paulus in both cases. Allegedly, Stalin fought the Tsarists in the town that was afterwards named after him, in 1918 or 19. Defeat of the Germans in Stalingrad would associate the name of "Stalin" with military victory. I don’t think Joachim Hoffmann intended to write false history. Why did Hitler attack Russia and fight an unwinnable 4-front war, there must be some rational explanation to this. If we favour the theory that the war was scripted, then Hoffmann’s theory covers only one part of the story, that of Stalin, and misunderstands Hitler’s intentions. Both parties were preparing for war and both must have expected war. The story as I know it is that Russians had amassed troops to attack Germany, that’s what Sowurov says. Germany was then forced to launch a preemptive attack. That attack on the forces gathered near the border turned out to be a stunning defeat for the Russian side because they were not ready to switch to defensive action : I can’t believe that story, they must have had intelligence weeks in advance. I think it’s more plausible that Russian forces were meant to take a severe blow so that German troops could advance into Russia to the extent they did. Eustace Mullins said that Stalin had a nervous breakdown when he got news that German troops were invading Russia and that from then on the Russian military was controlled out of the American embassy. There is that rumour that there was a tunnel from the Göbbels bunker, to the bunker of the American embassy which allegedly remained staffed through the war years. I cannot verify these things. But if that was so it would be a piece in the puzzle and the war being orchestrated out of the American embassies in Moskow and Berlin.
google: Hitler's military blunders.
--30 years war 1618-1648
-- short-lived Bavarian Soviet Republic (Munich, 1919
--Note of films: only one jew film with rats. cp US films
--- University of Munich, Dr. Franz Seidler, from his book, Das Recht in Siegerhand (Victors’ Justice):
“It has taken more than a half century for it to become permissible to condemn the Western Allies (Britain and the USA) for the crimes that they committed in the Second World War against the rules of war and against the treatment of civilians during and after that war. The Western Allies bombed German residential areas with the cold blooded purpose of attempting to break the moral of the population and the Western Allies cared nothing for the five hundred thousand victims who lost their lives. The Western Allies shot thousands of German POWs. After the capitulation of the German armed forces the Western Allies denied German POWs their rights as prisoners of war as guaranteed by international conventions, and left them to rot in open fields (as at the Rheinwiesen camp). The German POWs were employed illegally by the Allies as slave-labour. The Western Allies approved and supported the greatest act of genocide ever committed in Europe when 15 million Germans were expelled from their ancestral home-lands. The Western Allies ruthlessly looted German industries and stole German technical know-how. They did nothing as hundreds of thousand of Germans, denied adequate rations and heating, succumbed to hunger and cold. The Western Allies imprisoned three million Germans in camps. All this after the War was over.” Quote ends.
instauration dec 1976:-
the German inflation of 1923, caused little if any social disorder (Hitler's movement went absolutely nowhere at that moment) other than wiping out the savings of a nonworking middle class, and a lot of war debts. Everyone else was on the escalator together. It was the deflation of 1930-32 and the unemployment and misery associated with it that brought the Hitlerian revolution.
??? what did the countries who bartered with Germany do? Presumably bankers would dislike them too
Sir Arthur Bryant:
It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like A THIRD OF THE PROPERTY IN THE REICH. Most of it came into their hands during the hyperinflation.
To those who had lost their all, this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice.
hitler sep 1 1939
spent 90 bn reichsmarks .. amongst best equipped in world ... NB danzig corridor, and poland, casus belli
This night, for the first time Polish regular soldiers fired on our own territory. We have been returning the fire since 5:45 a.m. Henceforth, bomb will be met with bomb! He who fights with poison shall be fought with poison. He who distances himself from the rules for a humane conduct of warfare can only expect us to take like steps.
once a Prussian king with a ludicrously small state faced off a far more powerful coalition, and three battles later he stood victorious in the end, for he possessed that strong believing heart, the kind which we need in these times as well. I would like to assure the world around us of one thing; there shall never be another November, 1918 in German history!
MYTH: THE GERMAN ARMED FORCES
OUTNUMBERED THEIR NEIGHBOURS
By Michael Walsh
10-4-8
[or maybe Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof.]
POLAND
30 Active Divisions
10 Reserve Divisions
12 Large Cavalry Brigades
Poland had nearly 2,500,000 trained men available for mobilisations.
FRANCE
110 Divisions
65 were active divisions
Including 5 cavalry divisions, two mechanised divisions, one armoured division, the rest being infantry.
On the German borders stood the French commandstood 85 Divisions and could mobilise 5,000,000-armed troops. These were supported backed by five British divisions.
BRITAIN
Britain's relatively small but high quality Regular Army was supported by the Territorial Army consisting of 26 Divisions with plans well in hand to boost this to 55 divisions. This of course was in turn supported by the then world's largest conscription army holding an empire 'upon which the sun never set.'
The British Empire consisted also of the former German 'empire' of New Guinea, Nauru, Western Samoa, South West Africa, Quattar, Palestine, Transjordan, Tanganyika, Iraq, Togoland and the Cameroons. These territories stolen from Germany added another 1,061,755 square miles to the British Empire, the equivalent of 35 Scotlands
GERMANY
Against these formidable forces Germany was able to mobilise just 98 divisions of which only 52 were active (including Austrian divisions). Of the remaining 46 divisions only 10 were fit for action on mobilisation and even in these the bulk of them were raw recruits who had been serving for less than one month.
The other 36 divisions consisted mainly of Great War veterans over the age of forty who were unfamiliar with modern weapons and up to date military techniques.
THE BALANCE SHEET
On the balance sheets it can be seen that the Poles and French alone, not counting Britain and its Empire, had the equivalent of 130 divisions against a total of 98 German divisions of with 1/3rd were virtually untrained men.
In terms of trained soldiers the Germans were at an even bigger disadvantage. (Note at the outbreak of war over 50% of the German armed forces was horse drawn).
WAR IN THE AIR
"The superiority of the Luftwaffe has been greatly exaggerated to create the impression that Britain was the underdog; a David fighting Goliath. In the run up to the Battle of Britain (August 10th 1940) the Luftwaffe had 929 fighters available; mostly single-engine Messerschmitt 109s. Of these 227 were twin-engine long-range Me110s which had a top speed of 350mph. Although it had a faster rate of climb it was inferior when turning or manoeuvring.
The ME109's range restricted its field of operation. Their real fields of operation * out and back * was a little over 100 miles, a flight time of barely 95 minutes and a tactical flight time of just 75 minutes. This was a sever handicap when it is considered that whereas the Luftwaffe pilots were operating scores of miles from their base, British pilots were often within sight of their own. This handicap was made more critical by the fact that downed RAF pilots could be rescued whilst Luftwaffe pilots were of course * if they were lucky * imprisoned.
The twin-engine ME110 was a slow flyer able to cruise at a little less than 300mph and was easily outpaced by the RAF's Spitfires. It was also 'sluggish in acceleration and difficult to manoeuvre.'
The greatest handicap for the Germans however was there primitive radio equipment. Unlike the British versions it was poor in air-to-air operation and could not be controlled by the ground.
On the British side a total surpassing 650 fighter aircraft had been amassed by mid-July, mostly Hurricanes and Spitfires although including nearly 100 of the older types. During that whole year Britain produced 4,238 fighters compared with a derisory 3,000 manufactured by Germany.
In terms of armaments the noted British military historian, B.H Liddell Hart noted: "What is quite clear, and became evident at the start, was that the German bombers were too poorly armed to be able to beat off the British fighters without a fighter escort of their own." * History of the Second World War.
• mileswmathis.com/hiller.pdf is an astonishing tour-de-force—name-changing and rich connections of the founding 'National Socialist workers party' members and the supposed putsch. If anyone believes Hitler was not a Jew, here is the piece of work to challenge; otherwise, it seems pretty certain the NSDAP was a Jewish construct. Mathis hasn't yet looked at the 'Night of the Long Knives'—I'd guess killing those Germans who had detailed knowledge of Jews, or plans which excluded them: Gregor Strasser for example. And note: Britain had aristocratic links with jews; and USA rich links - hence eg Anglo-German coal agreement ?1939
Page (below) from
Marxism in Politics by the Jew Ralph Miliband. He mentions German Social Democracy. Jew-funded 'newspapers' enormously outnumbered honest news sources. Like modern USA. (Page taken from archive.org).
• Since at least 1890 Jews in Germany had a full-on campaign for German Social Democracy, which in effect was Jewish 'communism'. The 'Belgian' Jew Ralph Miliband in
Marxism and Politics (Oxford University Press, 1977) wrote of German Social Democracy: '.. a vast institution that was staffed by more than 4,000 paid functionaries and 11,000 salaried employees, had 20,000,000 marks invested in business and published over 4,000 periodicals'. As news of Jewish outrages in the newly-invented USSR leaked into Germany, it must have been discredited, and controlled opposition sought for.
• 1924 Hitler was let out of jail early and given German citizenship by the same government he plotted to overthrow in the Beer Hall Putsch and note on supposed war record and confusions over names, which army etc - and idea of fighting.
• 1925
Mein Kampf Note the attitude of start afresh, 'born again', 'rebirth', Hitler as 'Messiah' or 'Moschiach'. It's usually unnoticed how this buries the past; no investigations into Jew control of war materials, blockades and starvation, odd events of WW1, including its sudden stop. It also focusses on a single individual, distracting away from the reality that large numbers are needed.
Mein Kampf says nothing about the Thirty Years War in which Germany was devastated (apart from Jewish areas), or the invasion by Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden, or Napoleon—which led many people to ridicule the idea of the pure race of German Volk.
Note on 'pure race': it's impossible to be certain about the effects of race mixing, because modern technology has coincided with Jew control. Jews do anything to prevent honest debate on race—try asking any 'geneticist'.
• Disputes over whether the 'NSDAP' ought to be called 'right' or 'left' were settled at least in the English-speaking world when the Jewish press in effect decided they must be 'right', so they could pretend Stalin was 'left'. There were analogous classification problems with 'nationalism'. Since no political group was serious about workers' rights, it would make more sense to refer to them as 'Jewish' or (if this were possible) anti-Jewish.
• 1928 Birobidzhan—about as far from Europe as possible—and incidentally next to China—was suggested as a Jewish area, possibly as an emergency bolt-hole.
• 1928 "I did not and do not even today, for understandable reasons, wish to reveal that
from October 1928, the two largest regular contributors to the Nazi party were the general managers of the two largest Berlin banks, both of the Jewish faith and one of them the leader of Zionism in Germany" - Dr Heinrich Brüning (1885-1970), Chancellor of Germany 19930-1932, in a 1937 letter to Winston Churchill.
(From David Irving, who stated churchill was not allowed to put it in his multi-volume history, pubd by Time-Life)
• 1929 Geneva Convention nominally had four classes of Convention in wartime. The standard pseudo-histories say Stalin didn't sign, and leave it at that. The effect of course was that Jews could get away with secret massacres and slow killings in the USSR. And that Jews in other countries would be protected, even after years of attacks on innocent Germans, Poles, Romanians, Hungarians and others. Concentration camps in Germany protected Jews selectively and allowed another generation (see photos) of Jewish war criminals, fraudsters, and race destroyers to exist.
• 1933 Freemasonry ordered to be disbanded, and property seized. Newsreels show displays of gimmickry, regalia etc. But I could see no evidence that archives were collected and assets identified and seized. [In
The Greatest Story Never Told on Freemasonry, there is rather silly film, but nothing on practicalities; my best guess is that it was left for future reconstitution]
• 1933 Hitler government was granted a huge credit line by the governor of the
Rothschild controlled Bank of England, Montague Norman
• 1933,
'De Geldbronnen Van Het Nationale Socialisme Drie Gesprekken Met Hitler Door Sidney Warburg' ['The Money Sources of National Socialism—Three Conversations Between Hitler and Sidney Warburg.'] published in Amsterdam
• 1933
Jewish Domination of Weimar Germany by
Eckhart Verlag and Francis Dupont is the presentation at present of a National Socialist book. ('Eckhart Verlag' is a publisher, not a person.) In fact this compilation lists percentages etc, BUT has no Talmudic information, and no accounts of Jewish methods, notably in the First World War, the most important event at the time, and nothing on the Fed or on funding by Jews for weapons for both sides of local conflicts. I'd suggest this book was damage control, and reveals nothing important of Jewish mindsets—including mass murders in Jewish-controlled USSR.
• 1934
"Hitler and Schacht are the bulwarks of civilization in Germany and the only friends we have.... If they fail, Communism will follow in Germany, and anything may follow in Europe." (Russell C. Leffingwell to Thomas Lamont of J P Morgan, July 25, 1934. It seems Leffingwell was Jew-naive and misunderstood 'Communism', but even so his view must have been common enough.
• 1934 Brownshirt killings: Night of the Long Knives/ Röhm Putsch. Followed rapidly on Hitler's election or appointment. I'd guess to remove leading anti-Jewish Germans who understood the Jewish issue. Gregor Strasser seems a perfect example. The story of brownshirt homosexuality seems to be spread by Jews, as a distraction.
• July 1936
Jews began funding Winston Churchill with a huge cheque given to him by the British Board of Jewish Deputies to buy his loyalty and have him attack Germany and kill millions of Germans.
• 1936 'Axis': But Italy was not very Jew-aware. So why ally with Italy? (Miles Mathis hatchet-jobs Mussolini as an actor in https://big-lies.org/mileswmathis/benito.pdf). Many central European states had problems with Jews: notably Hungary, Rumania, Poland which would seem better candidates. See
Poland
• 1939, 1941 Hitler's Appeal for Peace and Call to Reason to Prevent WWII in 1939. Does not mention Jewish machinations. [Full text in English is online. It has about four references to Jews, with nothing specific, despite information from wiretaps etc. And in 1941: talks of Britain fighting Spain, Holland, and France, but omits Jews. Both can be read as fake attempts to put off war.
And Dec 1941 Declaration of war against USA. Roosevelt [Hitler seems to claim Roosevelt was surrounded by Jews, but not a Jew himself] created new conflicts, intensified existing conflicts, and prevented peaceful resolution of conflicts, particularly in Europe, involving the USA and diverting attention from home policies. October 5th 1937 began a series of speeches, inciting action against Germany. Ambassadors were recalled. From November, Roosevelt threatened other countries: blocking credits, economic reprisals, calling in loans etc. as shown by Polish ambassadors' reports. On 4 Jan 1939, he threatened to take every measure except war to the 'authoritarian' countries [not the USSR]. In March 1939, he lectured on internal European affairs. Roosevelt refused to recognise countries he didn't like, and recognised non-existent countries, and concluded treaties with the ambassadors so he could occupy Greenland and Iceland. April 15 1939 Roosevelt appealed to the Axis to conclude non-aggression pacts with countries annexed or protectorates of Britain and France, or allied with Roosevelt. [Comment on Roosevelt, his wife, and racketeers]. Nov 1939 Neutrality Act was revised to one-sided supply of arms to Germany's adversaries. And China was pushed into entanglements. A small group of Poles was recognised as a so-called government in exile. April 9 1940 Norwegian and Danish assets in the USA were frozen. May 15 1940 Dutch and Belgian assets in the USA were frozen, and 'governments in exile' recognised. June 15 1940 offered double its aid to France to continue war against Germany. If Germany took back lands stolen from it, Roosevelt would not recognise them. The vast money spent on weapons would be recognised as fraud. June 17 1940 he froze French assets in the USA to get hold of gold from Casablanca [in French Morocco] carried on a US cruiser. From July 1940: Roosevelt began war measures - US citizens in RAF; training of RAF personnel in the USA; joint military policy with Canada; invented crises; Sept 1940 50 USD destroyers to British navy in exchange for control of British possessions in N and central America; as the British Empire crumbled, Lend-Lease Act March 1941 was imposed on Americans.
[List of actions, contrary, according to Hitler, to International Law:] Tuscaloosa, and German passenger liner Columbus which had to be scuttled. US forces [though neutral] helped against German merchant ship Arauca. Jan 27 1940 US cruiser Trenton reported 3 German ships to enemy forces. June 27 1940 limited free movement of foreign merchant ships in US ports. Nov 1940 pursued 3 German merchant ships, forced to scuttle. OSS chief Donovan sent to organise against Germany and Italy [from Bulgaria and Serbia]. Apr 3 1941 US ships were permitted through the Red Sea to supply Britain in the Middle East. March 1941 all German ships were confiscated by the USA and German citizens treated in degrading ways. March 27 1941 support pronounced for General Simovic in Yugoslavia after overthrow of the legal government. April promised lend-lease to Yugoslavia and Greece, recognised governments-in-exile, and froze assets. April 1941 US naval patrols reported observations to the British. And 20 high-speed patrol boats to Britain. Ships were repaired in the USA contrary to international law. June 4: US airfields in Greenland. June 9: US warship ordered by Roosevelt to depth-charge a German submarine. June 14: German assets in the USA frozen, against international law. June 17: Roosevelt demanded the recall of German consuls, and the closing of German consulates, the closing of 'Transocean' press agency, the German Library of Information [in NY], and German Reichsbahn office [national railway]. July 6 and 7 1941 American armed forces occupied Iceland, in the area of German military operations, trying to force Germany into war against the USA and oppose German submarines, as in 1915-1916. At the same time, he promised aid to the [Jewish-controlled] USSR. July 10: US Navy under orders to fight Axis warships. Sept 4: US destroyer Greer operated with RAF against German submarines in the Atlantic. US destroyers escorting British convoy. Sept 11 1941: Roosevelt confirms his order against all Axis ships. Sept 29 US patrols attack a German submarine. Oct 17, Nov 6, more US naval aggression. [Roosevelts insults, including 'gangster', a term originating in America]. Roosevelt and Wilson mentally unsound. Roosevelt and his Jewish supporters acted against Japan in the same way: incitement to war, lies about its causes, and baseless allegations, then as a Freemason calls on God. His shameless untruths and violations of law are unparalelled in history. Japan finally after years of negotiating reacted at Pearl Harbor Dec 7 1941. We regard this with deep appreciation. The power behind Roosevelt is the eternal Jew that believes his hour has come to impose the horror in Soviet Russia. Millions of German soldiers have seen [in WW1?] the land where Jewry has annihilated people and property. Even if we were not allies we would realise Jews and their Franklin Roosevelt intend to destroy one state after another. The Reich of today has nothing in common with Germany of the past. [?] We will now do what this provocateur has been aiming at. Germany and Italy have the insight and strength to realise that the existence or non-existence of nations is being determined, perhaps for all time. They brought democratic Germany [1918-1933] to starvation. And they seek to destroy today's National Socialist Germany. Churchill and Roosevelt, rather than war, should have concerned themselves with their own unemployed; they have enough poverty and misery. Germany demands it rights even if a thousand Churchills and Roosevelts conspire. Our nation has 2,000 years of history, and has never been so united and determined as today. The American charge d'affaires was bluntly told today: Roosevelt's policy helped by Britain has used every means to deny Germans, Italians, and Japanese the needs for their vital existence, and opposed every effort to create a new and better order. Since the beginning of the war [Sept 1939; when Britain and France declared war - not yet world war] Roosevelt has committed ever more serious crimes against international law, reaching the point that, in complete violation of international law, he has ordered the US Navy to everywhere attack and sink German and Italian ships and imprison their crews. Roosevelt's plan to attack Germany and Italy by 1943 at the latest was made public in the US [Chicago tribune and several newspapers, Dec 4 1941] and the US government made no attempt to deny it. Germany and Italy patiently tried to prevent the expansion of this war, but these efforts have failed. Faithful to the Tripartite Pact of Sept 27, 1940, Germany and Italy now regard themselves as finally forced to join Japan against the USA and Britain. The three powers have concluded the following agreement, signed today in Berlin: The German, Italian, and Japanese governments have agreed: [5 Articles:] Article 1 Germany, Italy and Japan will together conduct the war that has been forced upon them by the United States of America and Britain with all the means at their command... and not to conclude an armistice or make peace unless by complete mutual agreement. [and] work very closely together after a victorious conclusion of the war.
7-7.5 M dead germans 3.4 M POWs in russia/ eisenhower rhine camps 1.5 - 2M after the war
• Eisenhower, a 'Swedish Jew', promoted above better-qualified men; went on to participate in numerous Jewish corrupt policies and frauds. Note the 'military-industrial' speech carefully-crafted by a speechwriter omits Jewish money power.
[noted by Mike King]
Taylor on German weapons spending not sufficient for war
Italy
small size note
importance of mussolini at the time
gramsci 'prison notebooks' - another jew fraud
[ Top of page ]
Small Countries
[ Top of page ]
from Tom Hendriksen Summary
In the beginning of April 1940, Germany and the Allies Great-Britain and France invaded Norway at the same time. Why was it that the outpost Norway became the first war theater between the Allies and Germany? The standard popular Hollywood explanation is that Hitler wanted to grab Norwegian territory as a first step of conquering Europe from the Atlantic to the Ural mountains. Lunde shows that this view is untenable. Hitler wanted Scandinavia to remain neutral in a war that was forced upon him by the British and the French. The Norwegian campaign was an escalation of the war initiated by Churchill. Germany had two major vulnerabilities: dependence on oil from Rumania and iron ore supply from Sweden. The Russians knew it, the British and French knew it. After Britain and France had declared war on Germany on september 3, 1939, after the conflict between Germany and Poland over Danzig had escalated, they were reluctant to act upon the war declaration. Germany never wanted war with Britain and France in the first place and Britain and France had too much respect for the German military to attack Germany directly in an all out war. They remembered all too well what had happened in World War 1, namely a Germany at war with Britain, France and Russia at the same time and nevertheless gradually gaining the upper hand in 1917. It was only the American war entry that brought down Germany in the end. In 1940 Germany had a non-agression pact with Russia and America was not yet in the war. So Churchill came up with the idea of attacking Germany indirectly by attempting to interrupt the supply of Swedish iron ore from Narvik/Norway. If this plan had succeeded, Germany would have lost the war even before it had started. Germany had no options other then intervening in Norway. In this review we only consider the decision taking process that lead to war, as described in the first two chapters of the book. The rest of the book deals with the details of the battles and is not considered here. We are only interested in the big picture and diplomatic maneuvering that lead to the invasion.
•Chapter one – deals with the events from the Allied perspective
•Chapter two – deals with the events from the German perspective
Editor: It is important to understand that there is no difference in the way the British and French behaved in Norway and in the Low Countries. Small countries Norway, Holland and Belgium were put under great pressure from the Allies to abandon neutrality and reluctantly cooperate in the Allied war effort against Germany. And in both cases it was Churchill who was the driving force behind all the operations.
The author Henrik Lunde is a Norwegian-American, who spent his career as an officer in the U.S. Army, including multiple combat tours as a highly decorated Airborne Ranger. Later, he served as Director, National and International Security Studies, U.S. Army War College. In other words, Lunde is a westerner, but to his astonishment has to admit that the war in Norway was forced upon Hitler by Churchill, the latter being anxious to finally get the war started and escalated. Lunde understands that the ‘wish to help the Finns against the Soviets’ was merely a pretext for the Allies to invade Norway and cut of iron ore supplies to Germany.
Everything about the official WW2 narrative is a lie, carefully concocted by the Allies in Nuremberg to their own advantage:
WW2 was the premeditated destruction of Europe by the globalist powers USA and USSR in an alliance that originated from 1933.
Hungary
[ Top of page ]
Hungarian Uprising 1956 .. villains.. quite clearly identify the people's uprising as having all the characteristics of a pogrom .. thousands of interrogations.. regime having a character imposed on Budapest by the Soviet tanks in 1945, 46 .. revi farkash?, guerer?, Rakosi cruel, murderous leaders..'
http://fpp.co.uk/books/Uprising/index.html
1956 [d irving asks] Dwight D. Eisenhower, despite his frequent campaign promises in 1952 to liberate the Soviet satellite nations, offered nothing beyond pious expressions of his nation's sympathy when the uprising began?
Ukraine
[ Top of page ]
After World War I, Poland became an independent nation which already “adopted discriminatory policies towards its Jewish citizens,” [wrote d irving]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmOGi0le0J0 germar rudolf 'curated lies' on auschwitz
As history shows, in 1919 and 1920 over one million Germans had to up and leave their homes because now, large segments of Prussia and Germany through 1918 had become Polish territory based on the Versailles treaty.
As history shows, tens of thousands of Germans were murdered, thousands were tortured and robbed, and hundreds just disappeared in these massacres that were all but sponsored by the Polish Government YES??? OR JEWS] at the time. Exact figures for dead, displaced and missing are unknown. Estimates for German fatalities typically mark near 60,000 people. tens of thousands of Germans were murdered, thousands were tortured and robbed, and hundreds just disappeared in these massacres that were all but sponsored by the Polish Government at the time. Exact figures for dead, displaced and missing are unknown. Estimates for German fatalities typically mark near 60,000 people.
note katyn forest and ?20000 polish officers [presumably non-jews]
and 500K poles by train secretly in suggests jew popn up, non jews down
polish catholics to be led by jew pope
hoffman --
All Polish patriots and their friends and allies should engage in this ideological battle with the best resources, and one of the very best is Judaic author John Sack’s magnificent book, An Eye for an Eye, about the Judaic-Communist mass murderer Salomon Morel who was given safe haven from war crimes prosecution by the Israeli government. The murders he perpetrated in Poland counted for nothing (for the relevant halacha cf. BT Sanhedrin 57a). Poland should use Sack’s facts in the information war now underway.
===
note to hoffman --- the 200,000 figure of Jews supposedly slaughtered by Poles during WW2 is a total and utter lie.
It began 1996 in Buenos Aires when the president of World Jewish Congress, one Israel Singer publicly stated that Poland would be publicly humiliated until it cowtows to the Jewish restitution claims (fully paid off, as stated above), roughly estimated at $65 mld back then, which would obviously ruined the already poor and economicly underdeveloped Poland that at that time had only just broken the shackles of Communism.
Then in 1998 the then-German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder publicly annouced: "The times of penance for Germany are over" meaning they would no longer accept any more Jewish/Israeli 'holocaust' compensation claims. It is roughly from then on that the massive and very overt collusion of Germany and Jewish diaspora/Israel began the be clearly observable, a collusion aimed at slowly but surely shifting the blame from Germans to Poles ("Germans" were slowly beginning to be supplanted with "Nazis" in the hollywood movies / TV dramas etc.)
Cf. e.g.
https://translate.google.pl/translate?sl=pl&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=pl&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fmichalkiewicz.pl%2Ftekst.php%3Ftekst%3D3371&edit-text=&act=url
Around the year 2000 a book came out by a Polish-born 'scholar' (Princeton graduate in... sociology, mind you) of the chosen stock, one Jan Tomasz Gross – a self-ordained 'historian' of the 'holocaust'. That's when the case of the so called Jedwabne pogrom caught notoriety in the MSM. He claimed that a whoopping 1600 Jews were burnt alive in a barn at the town of Jedwabne in 1941, supposedly by their Polish neighbours. (there were not even 1600 Jews in the entire county at the time, let alone Jedwabne only, which had a mixed Polish-Jewish population, roughly 50-50%).
The whole scam was since thougrougly debunked, even though the then Minister of Justice, late president Lech Kaczynski [NB - same surname as the 'Unabomber' hoax-RW] decreed the exhumation works be stopped, at the orders from the (he still holds that office) chief Rabbi of Poland, US-imported Michael Schudrich, whose only justification was that it would somehow hurt the religious feelings of the Jews. Conveniently, they demanded a halt precisely when very suggestive and equally inconveient artifacts began to show in huge quantities (German rifle and pistol shell cases). You can read a ton of articles on the topic in English, including by the prominent Polish-American historian, prof. Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski:
Norwegian author, Johannes Due Enstad (I presume Norwegian; perhaps a Jew?) wrote Soviet Russians under Nazi Occupation: Fragile Loyalties in World War II (New Studies in European History), published in 2018. It seems to make a case for widespread opposition to Jews, known as 'Bolsheviks', in European Russia. This has long been known about the Ukrainians, and Enstad wrote a PhD on the topic. It may of course just be controlled opposition; I haven't read it. It is listed on Amazon (in July 2021) so it can't be entirely honest. A few online views shows an amateur review by someone in Regina and other investigations show nothing competent. Possibly, even the title is a spoiler.
https://www.naszawitryna.pl:80/index_jedwabne_en_7.html
Poland
[ Top of page ]
Despite Polish anti-Jew feeling, there was hostility with Germany. Why?
According to Weronika Kuzniar/ Veronica K Clark:
• August 1936, the Polish government ordered that all shops include the name of the owner on their business sign. This immediately revealed to the public just how many retail outlets were controlled by Jews
• January 1, 1937, the Polish parliament outlawed the practice of Jewish ritual slaughter of animals. (The animal has its throat cut, and is left to die in pain while a rabbi prays over it
• May 1937, the Polish Medical Association adopted a paragraph into their professional charter excluding Jews from the medical profession. The Polish Bar Association adopted a similar measure.
• 1938 the Polish ambassador to the US, Jerzy Potocki reported to Warsaw on the American political scene:
The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State Department is becoming ever more powerful ... The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe ... This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press.
• January 1938, the General Assembly of Journalists added a provision to its by-laws stating that Jews were not allowed to belong to their organization.
• May 1938 restrictions on Jewish lawyers to attain licenses.
• April 1938, the Bank Polski, the Polish state's largest financial institution, adopted a provision excluding Jews from its transactions.
•
That Hitler permitted an estimated 150,000 or more ethnically Jewish and part-Jewish persons to serve in the NS military? Clausewitz: "War (applied force) is the continuation of politics (Nazism) by other means (invasion and killing)." Hitler invaded a fellow Nordic-Aryan-Slavic nation, Poland, to erect a German chauvinist empire in Eastern Europe. Hitler used Jewish soldiers and even Jewish money (via the BIS and neutral, pro-Semitic Switzerland) to wage war and mass murder fellow Aryans/whites in Eastern Europe. Ponder that.
That Hitler allied with the "Jewish-Bolsheviks," his Nemesis, to invade the Aryan/white nation of Poland? Poland was anti-Semitic and, like Nazi Germany, wanted Jewish people to get out of Europe and emigrate to Palestine. Hitler smashed them regardless..with Stalin's help.
I found an
interview online with Clark/Kuzniar and it's clear she's likely to be just another liar; probably Jew from Poland, I'd guess. Sigh. She has a bitchute channel
powerwolf-podcasts/. A defence is
she has read about 100 relevant books and reviewed 1000 more, so she has some unusual ideas that no one else has presented, and she has material to pick from. So when you already know a lot about a subject, it gets harder to find something new. So if you listen to VC, you should maybe just drop 99% of what she says, and keep the last 1%.
========================
JOHN WEAR 'Germany's War' (publd 2015)
Many of the Germans in Poland were also sent to the former German concentration camps. In March 1945, the Polish military command declared that the entire German people shared the blame for starting World War II. Over 105,000 Germans were sent to labor camps in Poland before their expulsion from Poland. The Polish authorities soon converted concentration camps such as Auschwitz-Birkenau, Lambinowice (called Lamsdorf by its German occupants) and others into internment and labor camps. In fact, the liberation of the last surviving Jewish inmates of the Auschwitz main camp and the arrival of the first ethnic Germans were separated by less than two weeks.
When the camps in Poland were finally closed, it is estimated that as many as 50% of the inmates, mostly women and children, had died from ill-treatment, malnutrition and diseases.[11]
In a confidential report concerning the Polish concentration camps filed with the Foreign Office, R.W.F. Bashford wrote:
[T]he concentration camps were not dismantled, but rather taken over by new owners. Mostly they are run by Polish militia. In Swietochlowice, prisoners who are not starved or whipped to death are made to stand, night after night, in cold water up to their necks, until they perish. In Breslau there are cellars from which, day and night, the screams of victims can be heard.[12]
====================================================
Indrek Pringi
Indrek Pringi
3 years ago
I found the real reason for WW2 buried in David Irving's book: "Hitler's War" on pgs 138-139. It concerns the repatriation of Jews back into Poland in 1939 and 4 years back earlier when he began to reclaim the lands lost to Germany which were stolen by the Versailles Treaty.
It turns out that what really happened to the Jews in Germany and in the land Hitler added to Germany before WW2 is a twofold story which has never to my knowledge been researched or written about. They were two entirely different stories.
For the jews living in the Germany proper that Hitler took over iin 1933: A slow, systematic introduction of anti-Jewish laws and regulations spanning a period of seven years in which jews were not harmed or put into prison, but merely persecuted, ostracized and treated as outcasts.
This resulted in. 90% of the jews living in Germany proper voluntarily emigrating out of Germany... They were simply squeezed out: slowly: systematically: without harming them or the society they had embedded themselves into, like squeezing the seeds out of an orange without crushing the seeds or destroying the orange. Instead of deporting them by force, The National Socialists and Germans made them leave of their own accord simply because they were not liked and not wanted.
By this over-all strategy of systematic discriminatory laws against jews:: and their ostracism from all German society, Hitler and the Germans solved the jewish problem non-violently, without any brutality or physical force being used, After 7 years of this squeezing them out: the Lyon jews left were the ones who were of jewish blood but NOT jewish in their culture or beliefs or religion. They had been GERMANIZED. They had intermarried into German families and lost their Judaic religion and culture. They had been absorbed into German culture. many of them served in the German Wehrmacht and the SS and were loyal to Hitler to the death. They did not recant; they did not go back back to being jews just because Germany was losing the war.
So... the jewish problem was solved, right? it had been solved very nicely. Forced out of Germany... these Jews declared war against Germany... who cared about these social aoutcasts... nobody except the international jewry of the international mafia syndicate of criminal jewish banksters, and racist hate filled jews living all over the world. At first an economize war was declared against Germany by the jews. Jews from all over the world boycotted German exports and imports. Germany's trade shrank to almost nothing... but this did not stop the rejuvenation and blossoming of German Culture and German well being! Germany was a success story in spite of the Jewish economic boycott. The jewish econnomnic boycott was ignored by the world and treated as if it did not exist.... but it DID exist... and the jewish racist hatred against Germany and Germans existed
All right....that's one side of the story... Now switch over to the OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY: not the jews living in Germany porper... but the jews living in the land Hitler reclaimed for Germany. The land which had been stolen from Germany. The
jews living in:
The Rhineland
Hanover
Vienna
Sudetenland
Slovakia
Moravia
Bohemia
Carpatho-Ukraine; for god's sake
What happened to them? Theirs was a completely different story from the voluntary mass exodus of jews out of Germany proper...
BUT...in order to to understand THEIR story....
You need to understand the true story of what happened to the German people living in these German lands lands From 1918 to 1939... Twenty years of systematic oppression, taxation, killing, murder, torture, terrorizing, persecution, impoverishment under jews.
This is another part of the true history of Europe which has been covered up and buried. The jews who flocked to Versailles and gained a special dispensation for an independent Polish nation to be recognized: did this because Poland had been jewified and was under total jewish control. It was the closest thing they could get to having their own land and their own jewish nation. Jews had been intermarrying into Polish high society for CENTURIES; for 100's of years until they had become thoroughly accepted into polish culture and society: Until Poland became known worldwide as 'The Land of The Jews"... And from this jewified nation: their offspring spread like lice on a rat's ass all over the diseased body of Europe: into Germany and especially into key appointments of power in the occupied territories which had been so 'generously' 'given' to various other nations by the scum who wrote the Versailles Treaty. The result of the Versailles Treaty: was a systematic racist program of discriminatory laws inflicted by the jews in power over their German victims for twenty years in every land stolen from Germany after WW2....
But to understand why this happened... You need to go even further back into European History and understand just why the jews hated the Germans so much... The reason for their racist hatred was because Germany was the last... I repeat, Germany was the LAST nation in Europe to grant emancipation to jews: the right to own property and the right to vote. Germany: the states and duchies of German speaking people kept their jews locked up in ghettoes. fLnger than any other nation in Europe the Germans kept the jews apart form their society and did not allow them to infiltrate or intermarry into their society. For this: the jews invented a special vile racist hatred against all Germany and all German people. This was why when they were granted emancipation, when they did gain power over Germans: they became the most brutal, subhuman overseers of any oppressed people in Europe...
So now! jump back to the lands Hitler freed the once-German lands from Jewish control and oppression between 1935-1939. Most of the jews in these lands were of Polish origin. They were Polish jews wreaking 'revenge' on a hapless German people who had their rights taken away from them and their land taken away from them. In nearly all cases, they were jews of Polish extraction. Even the jews living in Vienna and Austria had nearly all originally come from Poland. Then sudden;y the Anchluss happened. The German victims of jewish oppression were given back their rights, their land and their power !... and in every case: each land that was freed from Jewish rule: DEPORTED their jews by force: they stripped them of their titles, property and wealth and put them on trains.
Whoops!... whoops!... Nobody talks about this part of German and European history. You will see why as this untold story unfolds..
This was the unspoken, unexplained real reason why Hitler tried to get an international agreement to deport jews to Madagascar: which was blocked by the international jewish community. The Jews in Germany proper were already being gotten rid of peacefully by them leaving voluntarily. But the jews living in territories gained by the Hitler Anschluss were kicked out naked: violently: hated: despised. This was done by the Germans IN the freed territories: not by Hitler or the 3rd Reich. This was the reason why Hitler made an alliance with the Zionists who wanted these jews to go to Palestine to set up a new Jewish independent nation. His anti-Jewish rhetoric and platform before he gained power gave the German people the impression that once freed of their masters they could deport them by force: not by slow regulations being inflicted on jews, and they did just that
Whoops!... Whoops!.... But there was no independent nation of Israel yet: it had not yet been created. The move to deport these jews to Palestine was also blocked by the international jewish community. Why? To even allow the world to know that jews were being deported out of any country was a huge racial danger to their very survival! To their very existence as an evil alien culture existing secretly inside other civilized human cultures. Unless you are a jew: you will never know the unholy terror and fear they have of being kicked out of anywhere. Jews have been kicked out of lands they infiltrated for thousands of years.
Hitler tried to get rid of them but nobody wanted these homeless jews. Most of them were of Polish descent or were Polish expatriates: meaning they had originally been Polish citizens before emigrating and taking over control and the running and oppression the German people in the lands stolen from Germany a by the Versailles Treaty.
So what did the Nazi's do with these jews?...
Here's the crucial part of the story... which explains all that happened afterwards.
The Nazi regime secretly ran unscheduled trains at night secretly into Poland at night while the border officials were asleep and dumped then illegally into Poland....
Whooops! I forgot to mention Poland didn't want these expatriate Poles either! In fact they enacted a Law designed to deprive jews of their native Polish citizenship!
Now the plot thickens.. Because for 20 years; between 1918 and 19139, since Germany lost West Prussia to the newly created nation of Poland... the German city of Danzig was cut off from Germany proper... Germany and Poland had been squabbling and bickering over this for 20 years . In conventional history books the reason for Hitler invading Poland was the quarrel over the Danzig Corridor. All diplomatic attempts to come to an agreement over this issue for 20 years had failed. The issue could have been settled... it COULD have been settled... except for one thing that destroyed all diplomatic efforts between the two nations and set both of them to making war plans to invade their neighbor... Yes: both Germany AND Poland began preparing for war against each other not just Germany! This fact is mostly carefully hidden in conventional history books or never mentioned at all.
Why did this happen?
Why did Poland begin to mobilize for war against Germany and slogans of "Berlin in 2 weeks!" appear in Polish newspapers?
The reason is simple. The fact that in 1939... Hitler and the Nazis dumped over 500,000 homeless jews illegally into Poland is the hidden, unspoken, real reason WHY the Polish-German war began.
When this happened the Poles cut off all diplomatic relations and became very nasty towards the Germans and began preparing to invade Germany.
ALSO... when this happened: it triggered a jewish genocidal wave of racial hatred against Germans living in Poland. (You need to remember that more than 1/2 of Poland was originally German 20 years ago, and had been German for centuries.)
In retaliation for more than 1/2 a million homeless jews being dumped into Poland illegally: the poles and jews in Poland took their anger out on the only Germans that were available: the ones living in Poland. who had been stripped of all their rights and property... as the jews had done in every other German land stolen from Germany by the Versailles treaty. Jews and Poles in Poland began massacring Germans on a mass scale of butchery, sadism, brutality and horror NEVER BEFORE SEEN in European history.
This part of the story has been completely covered up by the jewish media. But it is a crucial part of the true story and cannot be omitted if you want to understand the real story just how and why WW2 began: the untold story.. the covered up truth that all history books hide and lie about.
What happened was a series of reactions. Dominos fell one by one. Hitler's diplomatic attempt to solve the Danzig corridor failed because he dumped more than half a million homless deported Jews into Poland. When he did that the Poles broke off all diplomatic relations and became distinctly hostile towards Hitler and Germany. When that happened: The Jews of England arranged a treaty. between England and Poland which was strategically and politically bullshit: It was a racist document: One tribe of jews coming together with another tribe against a common enemy of the jews.
The massacring of Germans in Poland made Hitler react quickly... BEFORE Poland could mobilize its forces Germany invaded Poland first. The Germans of West Prussia were saved from extinction and the sadistic horror of jews massacring Christians was covered up and buried as deep as possible.... Just as the massacring of Christians by jews in Russia has been covered up as much as possible and never mentioned in jewish media.
(Continued in 2nd post)
.PS:
One thing for anyone who watches these videos of Irving and would like to buy his books... his books are the complete opposite of his public appearances. They are horribly disorganized, They have no timetable so the reader can understand the complicated sequence of events and put them into the larger context of the war. In his books he always attributes the most negative, cynical, evil, cunning motives to everything Hitler did and said. In his books he badmouths Hitler as much as possible. In his books he casts Hitler in the worst light possible.
Another thing about Irving's books is that he does not give any sources, any bibliography, any footnotes on where he gets his facts from. He does not give the reader any sources of his research. Nobody can cross-check his facts. This is a red flag for any historian or any book about history. When you can't check on what a historian writes: how can you verify his facts?
Another thing about Irving's books is that he attributes things to the people in his books which are impossible to know. He writes his books as fiction mixed up with fact: He writes as if he knows every secret thought Hitler had and every secret motive and secret emotion which he never told anybody... except to Irving... through the magic of contacting the ghost of Hitler?. Please... this continual sticking into the facts what Hitler thought or felt or was secretly planning is not only insulting the intelligence of every student of history; it is a deliberate demonizing of Hitler.
He gives no rational explanation for attributing these secret motives and thoughts and emotions to his characters. He does not bother to justify or support his attributing these fictional things to Hitler, or anybody else he writes about. He just blatantly states that they are SECRETLY feeling or thinking or planning certain things : and stinks these fictional statements into the factual narrative like poison pills: designed to make anyone who reads his book about Hitler to see Hitler as an evil monster, as a cunning, sly, hypocrite with hidden agendas, a two-faced power mad, devious, conniving figure of pure evil.
What Irving writes and what irving says in his speeches and lectures are as different as black and white. From his lectures you would think Irving sees Hitler as a gifted brilliant leader and a good decent person. While in his book "Hitler's War", Irving paints Hitler as the devil incarnate..?
=======================================
Indrek Pringi
Indrek Pringi
3 years ago
Continued from first post:The further heretofore unexplained explanation of just why WW2 began and Why and How it developed from a small war into a World War.
Now we have to look at the repercussion of the Nazi regime dumping 600,000 homeless penniless jews illegally into Poland in 1939. Poland was a land of 9 million people. What do you do with an almost 20% increase of your population?!!
5-600,000 homeless jews Who had No Money! Half of one tenth of the entire nation former expatriate Polish jews! Dumped illegally at night into Poland by the trainload! The outrage! the racial hatred! of... jews against Germans. Not the other way around. The reason for WW2 starting was jewish racist hatred against Germans. Not German racist hatred against jews. What is the difference between these two racist hatreds? One was justified: the other was not. As in Palestine: jewish genocide of Palestinians is unsupportable and unjustifiable. As in Stalin the jew his genocidal killing of 20 million Christians was complete unsupportable and unjustifiable. jews have no justifiable reason to hate anyone. On the other hand, Non-jews have good reason to hate jews and jewish culture and international judaism.
Now! On with the real story of why WW2 began...Back to Poland and what to do with more than half a million pennilesshomeless jews...
What did the Poles do with these 600,000 = 500,000 jews??? EH?
Hint.... can you spell 'concentrations camps'?
Now you have the crucial untold, covered up historical FACT which you will not find in any history book... the fact which explains everything that happened AFTER Hitler invaded Poland to stop the racist massacring of Germans by Polish jews.
All the unwanted jews deported out of:
The Rhineland
Hanover
Vienna
Sudetenland
Slovakia
Moravia
Bohemia
Carpatho-Ukraine; for god's sake
Hurrah! Now the German people are one united nation! Now all the nasty jews have been gotten rid of! Not the good jews: they are allowed to serve the Fatherland: The nasty ones were deported!
Then...? Hitler invades Poland and conquers only half of it. Hitler is acting out the English country gentlemen. He want to be included in the secret private exclusive club of western civilized industrialized powers. He doesn't understand that the British Empire is a Jewish fiefdom: secretly under the control of the Rothschild family jewish international mafia criminal syndicate.
Hitler wants to be magnanimous. He wants the entire world to appreciate and understand how truly civiilized and gentle and honest and upright the German people and German culture is.
He does not understand that he is dealing with hate-filled monsters who secretly rule the western world behind closed doors: monsters who are so evil: they leak poison out of their pores like a snake sheds scales off its reptilian hide. He does not understand that you cannot be gentle with brutes. Thugs do not understand gentility. They only understand brutality. He has no idea of the mass anti-Nazi anti-Hilter brainwashing campaign that has been going on in the west for over 9 years. He has no idea of how completely the jewish press have control over public opinion in the west.
Enter the victors into Poland...
Whoops!!!
Mein Gott in Himmel!!!
Ach Der Lieber!
There before there very eyes... are the 600,000 jews they thought they had gotten rid of... all being housed and fed in polish concentration camps built for them by the Polish jew-controlled govt. Like a pack of crows sitting in a nest of filth saying: 'Feed me! Clothe me! protect me from mine enemies!" "We are helpless jews! We are not the brutal sadists who killed and tortured our human victims! er... that was last year!... not now!"
What to do?
As Churchill: the paid good controlled by Rothschild who controls the Bank of England escalated the fake war into an actual war: The Germans found a use for these jews. They put them to work in munitions factories and kept their woman OUT of munitions factories in the home raising their children where they belonged. Moreover the women were not put to work and their children were taken care of. They were used as laborers but nothing near the horror and inhumanity of the English concentration camps of the Boer war or the death camps of Stalin's Gulag Archipelago.
The record for historical accuracy must state that at first in the beginning there were very few anti-Jewish atrocities committed by the Germans: as compared to what the Polish jews had done to their German victims... But as the WW2 progressed: its level of brutality, its level of subhuman atrocities rose ... globally all over the world.... Millions of people suddenly became insane murdering raping torturing monsters. Compared to all the other races, nations and cultures involved in WW2: the German people committed the LEAST number of atrocities and caused the least number of deaths. The racist anti-German media owned by jews has tried to reverse this historical fact around; it has failed. Except as a myth which has no historical facts to back up its lies.
Now you know where the concentration camps originally came from. They were built by the Polish Govt. Not by the German 3rd Reich. They were built to house deported jews: who had been dumped into Poland. It was only after Hitler conquered France and other lands; only after the war was escalated and Germany was attacked from all sides that jews began to be deported to the East because Hitler regarded them as a dangerous 5th column inside Germany who could not be trusted when Germany was fighting for its very Life.
The system of prison camps and concentration camps: the IDEA came from the Polish govt: not from the Nazi regime. The Germans just expanded on what was already built, and expanded on the Polish Govt's solution to the jewish problem: housing them in camps instead of liquidating them or deporting them. Putting them to work. The last years of the war and Himmler's documented killing sprees in 4 of the camps is a German exception to the rule. Generally the Germans were more civilized and more decent than their enemies. Especially the Bolshevik jewish run by the jew Stalin which is not his real name. Just as Rothschild is not the true name of the evil ones who control the Bank of England.
Now you know the real story: The awful german concentration camps... oops sorry: the awful POLISH concentration camp system taken over by the Germans. The deporting of jews out of the Anschluss occupation-expansion reclamation of German land! DESERVED. They should have all been shot and killed for what they did to the German people for 20 years.
The atrocities committed by Poles and Polish jews against Germans: Never Addressed. Never exposed. Covered up:
The atrocities of the Jew Stalin against Germany: NEVER ADDRESSED COVERED UP NEVER ATTACKED as it should be as the most inhuman butchery ever by evil Russian jews.
The conclusion: evil jews: whitewashed, covered up, hidden facts buried deep.
Innocent Germans pilloried, demonized. Hitler demonized, Nazi's demonized. National Socialism Demonized.
Black painted as white.
White painted as black.
All truths reversed
Good is evil
evil is GOOD
jewish brainwashing media: 100% propaganda misinformationi lies swindles hoaxes?
6
========================
Indrek Pringi
Indrek Pringi
3 years ago
+cambuurleeuwarden
Years: 30 years, 50 years of reading about WW2 and living with and personally knowing jews, Germans, Italians, greeks, Armenians, Blacks, Jamaicans, Trinidadians, Poles, Czechs, South Africans. Australians, Haitians, Philippino's Koreans, Japanese, Americans, Scots, Irish, Canadians, English, Chinese, Arabs, Lebanese, Congolese, Russians, Estonians, Finns, Swedes, Norwegians, Hungarians, Latvians, Mexicans, Columbians, Brazilians, French Canadians, French people from France,...
Years of reading books and watching films and documentaries.
David Irving's book Hitler's War mentions the illegal deportation of over 1/2 a million jews into Poland before WW2 began.
When you fit this piece of the puzzle into all of the other pieces: then the entire story becomes understandable... but you have to know all the other pieces of the puzzle first.
That means you have to sift the lies from the truth.
That means you have to develop your critical thinking skills.
That means you have to take the Pepsi Challenge.
That means you have to read more than one version of history and compare it to another version of history and find out who is lying and who isn't.
That means you will have to search for films and books that explain certain parts of the puzzle. Then you have to start putting the pieces of the puzzle together. That means you will have to do a lot of work reading and researching and writing. That means you have to be able to read a 1,000 page book. That means your reading and comprehension skills have to be developed to the level of a professional historian. That means you have to educate yourself. That means you have to know what you're looking for. That means doing your own research.
One thing will amaze you: I didn't spend all my time reading books and looking at documentaries just so I could give other people a list of what films I've watched and what books I've read for 50 years. I spent that time because I was curious and interested in history and wanted to understand history.
USA
[ Top of page ]
1933 [Landon; US Republican] "The concentration of power in the hands of the President was not a question of temporary emergency. It was a question of permanent national policy. In my opinion the
emergency of 1933 was a mere excuse.... National economic planning - the term used by this Administration to describe its policy - violates the basic ideals of the American system.... The price of economic planning is the loss of economic freedom. And economic freedom and personal liberty go hand in hand."
1933 US gold stolen
Many Americans have forgotten the basis of US society, the theory that the state should be minimal is in conflict with the Jewish idea that the 'State' is primary, meaning a Jewish controlled state. As with the idea of international law: it might be perfectly good, BUT only if it is not Jew controlled.
mullins in 2000: cost plus added 10%
islands around japan kept war goung
fighting up italy - keep it going
militarily no justification
hitler had to go to montague norman
2 dulles bros went to cologne assured him he'd have money
without hitler there would have been no world war 2
12 fed reserve banks; 11 unimportant; fed res in ny helped communists, fascists, nazis
1933 - In his book Aggression, Otto Lehmann-Russbueldt tells us that "Hitler was invited to a meeting at the Schroder Bank in Berlin on January 4, 1933. The leading industrialists and bankers of Germany tided Hitler over his financial difficulties and enabled him to meet the enormous debt he had incurred in connection with the maintenance of his private army. In return, he promised to break the power of the trade unions. On May 2, 1933, he fulfilled his promise." Present at the January 4, 1933 meeting were the Dulles brothers, John Foster Dulles and Allen W. Dulles of the New York law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell, which represented the Schroder Bank. The Dulles brothers often turned up at important meetings. They had represented the United States at the Paris Peace Conference (1919); John Foster Dulles would die in harness as Eisenhower's Secretary of State, while Allen Dulles headed the Central Intelligence Agency for many years. Their apologists have seldom attempted to defend the Dulles brothers appearance at the meeting which installed Hitler as the Chancellor of Germany, preferring to pretend that it never happened. One biographer, Leonard Mosley, bypasses it in Dulles when he states, "Both brothers had spent large amounts of time in Germany, where Sullivan and Cromwell had considerable interest during the early 1930's, having represented several provincial governments, some large industrial combines, a number of big American companies with interests in the Reich, and some rich individuals." Allen Dulles later became a director of J. Henry Schroder Company. Neither he nor J. Henry Schroder were ever suspected of being pro-Nazi or pro-Hitler; the inescapable fact was that if Hitler did not become Chancellor of Germany, there was little likelihood of getting a Second World War going, the war which would double their profits.
[mathis on smedley butler] I reckon that most of you reading this have heard of the so-called “Business
Plot,” which is sometimes described as “Wall Street’s Failed 1934 Coup” or “The
Banksters’ Fascist Coup.” It refers to the planning of a coup against Franklin Delano Roosevelt by, among others, the Morgan and Du Pont families. And they would have gotten away with it, too, if it hadn’t been for that meddling Smedley Butler and his talking dog.
Japan
[ Top of page ]
First—known to me—to suggest co-operation of USA and UK with Japan was Miles W Mathis here on 4th Jan 2021. (My website copy in case his vanishes). There are many oddities with Japan: financed by Jews to attack the Russian Empire in Tsarist times. Allied with Britain in the 'Great War'; rise of modern Japanese steel ships, a precursor of industrialism in the east. And new-style use of money to generate heavy industry, plus later the use of USA industry to secretly export military power to the Jewish USSR. The Hiroshima fake was a psyop which directed money to Jews in the USA as a special caste, controlling such things as uranium, secrecy, and propaganda in cinemas, TV, and 'news'. Curtis LeMay, the bomber, was awarded the Rose Cross (or something)—Japan's highest honour: probably something to do with the eclipse of landowners and such types as Kazoku by industrial types and their controllers.
Mathis I think implies that world war in the eastern "theater" was controlled by Jews in Japan and China and the 'Allies', to get what Jews wanted, including of course dead goys. This piece is mostly based around Germany, but bear the east in mind.
Japan and China; revisionist view that Nationalist China was anti-Jew, and Japan allied with them against Jewish China; possibly mutual hate of Jews based on Jews' Opium wars and Jewish intervention in Japan against Russia
Pearl Harbor by now well known to have been provoked and known in advanced; possibly faked by US
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Christian - may have been kept to last. Fairly well-known that the 'nuclear bombing' was a fake. Also some doubt over the populations there; many absent. Took at least a year to get the story into the free 'New Yorker' copy of [date]
[ Top of page ]
China
[ Top of page ]
• mention 50 year old Schurmann and Schell
Code Breaking in World War II
https://history.sandiego.edu/GEN/WW2Timeline/espionage.html
Links omitted
1929 - Henry Stimson closed America's Black Chamber unit led by Herbert Yardley, and transferred code operations to the secret Signal Intelligence Service led by William Friedman in the Army Signal Corps. The Navy had established a "research desk" in Room 1621 of the old Navy building under Lt. Laurence F. Safford with civilian cryptographer Agnes Meyer Driscoll who used IBM Hollerith card sorting machines to break the Japanese Red Book code. By 1939, this became OP-20-G within the Code and Signal Section of ONI.
1937 - Signal Corps officer Joseph Mauborgne used a Dictaphone to record Japanese radio signals at the San Francisco Presidio.
1939 - In August, the British moved codebreaking operations to Bletchley Park 40 miles northwest of London between Cambridge and Oxford, later renamed Government Code and Cypher School (GC&CS also referred to as the "Golf, Cheese and Chess Society") commanded by Alastair Denniston, 'including geniuses such as Ian Fleming, later author of the James Bond novels, and Alan Turing who developed a theory of the electronic computer.' (Momsen)
Feb 12, 1940 - The British minesweeper HMS Gleaner depth-charged and forced the U-33 to the surface, allowing the capture of rotors used in the German Enigma machines. The British continued to capture code information from German weather ships seized in 1940. On May 9, 1941, the British destroyer Bulldog captured the German U-110 commanded by Fritz-Julius Lemp who had sunk the Athenia in 1939, and with it seized a complete Enigma machine with its rotors and charts. The capture of the U-110 was one inspiration for the Universal film U-571.
June 12, 1940 - British decoded a Luftwaffe message that became the first success of Ultra. It described a German radio beam to guide Luftwaffe to the Rolls-Royce factory in Derby that made RAF engines, and the beam was jammed.
August 30, 1940 - the B-Dienst intercepted and solved a report that convoy SC 2, coming out of Sydney, Canada, would be at 50° 00' north latitude, 19° 50' west longitude, at noon on 6 September. U-boats sank five of the ships and Donitz praised the B-Dienst as a "major help" in the operation. On November 11, 1940, the Germans captured the British ship Automedon, from which they obtained the British merchant ship codes, improving the information B-Dienst provided to the U-boats. In 1943 the B-Dienst intercepted 3,101,831 messages and processed many of them on its 6 Hollerith tabulators. These helped the B-Dienst to solve intercepts in time for the command to use them. Shipping information also was given to the Germans by the Swiss who obtained it from American maritime insurance companies. (Kahn, Momsen)
Sept. 20, 1940 - Genevieve Grotjan completed the decryption of the Japanese Purple code at the Army's SIS, and shared the decoding with the Navy's OP-20-G (Navy on odd days). RCA provided equipment for a room at the Mayflower Hotel for the messages to be photographed and distributed to top government officials.
Nov. 14, 1940 - German Luftwaffe bombed Coventry but it was a myth that Churchill sacrificed the city to save the Ultra secret.
Mar. 25, 1941 - Station X decrypted an Italian Enigma message indicating the italian fleet was going to interdept a British convoy from Egypt to Greece. The British Navy attacked and turned back the Italian fleet.
Sept. 12, 1941 - A Bletchley Park report stated that "the killing of Jews on the Russian Front by the SS provided evidence of 'a policy of savage intimidation, if not ultimate extermination.' The intercepted messages confirm that Churchill knew in the early stages of the war that Hitler had embarked on a campaign of massacring Jews." ('Professor' Evans)
Dec. 1941 - The Germans intercepted the reports of the U.S. military attache Bonner Fellers in Cairo, and learned of British plans in North Africa. "One fine piece of work did yield extraordinary results. This was the German solution of the American military attache code. Among the attaches who used it was the man in Cairo, Colonel Bonner Fellers, a perceptive and hardworking officer. In late 1941 and early 1942 he reported on the events, the nature, and the course of this new desert warfare." (Kahn)
May 1942 - U.S. Navy codebreakers broke the JN25b code, "'JN' for Japanese Navy, '25' for the 25th code they had worked on, 'b' for its second edition. It had come into use near the end of 1940, and by early 1942 the Americans had recovered enough codegroups to read bits and pieces of Japanese messages." (Kahn)
Aug. 1942 - Ultra helped British stop Rommel in North Africa at Alam Haifa. "For the Eighth Army, the Battle of Alam Haifa was a resounding success. It has been described historically and contemporaneously as the centerpiece of the Allied victory in the desert war, the crucial time when momentum changed sides. The opposing forces were matched as they never would be again. . . . Following the First Alamein, the Eighth Army had taken a line of defense from the sea south to the impassable Qattarra Depression, protecting the Ruweisat and Alam Halfa ridges to the east. Before his supplies dwindled even more, Rommel meant to bring the Eighth Army to a climactic battle for the approaches to Alexandria. His plan depended entirely upon surprise and swift exploitation. After a demonstration in the north, Rommel planned to make his main assault through what he believed was a thinly mined, thinly defended corridor between Ruweisat ridge and the Qattarra Depression. Having breached the British left flank with his armored forces, he would take advantage of the confusion and surprise by sending his Panzers 40 kilometers more before turning them northward to threaten the Eighth Army's line of communications. The British defense was far more spirited and well organized than Rommel expected. Rommel's armor, harrassed by a thick screen of mines and the Seventh Armored Division, was forced to make its left wheel earlier than planned. In the meantime, Montgomery had refused his left flank and anchored his own armor on the western end of the Alam Haifa ridge. The German armor turned unknowingly into these prepared defenses and crashed fiercely against them. After the assault deteriorated along Alam Haifa ridge, the Axis forces disengaged and reasserted their original defense line to the west." (Kahn)
Feb. 1, 1942 - The German Navy added a fourth rotor to the Shark Enigma on Feb. 1, 1942, preventing the Allies from reading messages to German subs until Joe Desch at NCR in Dayton, Ohio, designed a 7-foot-tall, 11-foot-long, 5,000-pound electromechanical bombe to break the 4-rotor code by June 5, 1943. The shift "by the Kriegsmarine to an Enigma using four rotors instead of just three did not halt Bletchley, astonishingly enough, for more than a few days. Eventually, the Allies were able to pinpoint and sink the submarine fuel ships, as well as the attack U-boats themselves, and so with ULTRA'S help were able to win decisively this most decisive of battles." (Kahn)
1942 - Bletchley Park decrypted ciphers of the Abwehr, the German military espionage agency. "The intercepts told the British two important facts: that they had captured all the German spies in their islands, and what the Abwehr thought about its spies. The British deception organization found this information very useful in persuading the Germans, before the D-Day invasion, that the Normandy landing would be a feint." (Kahn)
Feb. 1, 1943 - Army SIS began the Venona program to intercept and decrypt messages between the Soviet government and Soviet spies in the Western hemisphere. In Oct., Lt. Richard
Hallock made a breakthrough in breaking some of the code. In 1944, Cecil Phillips broke the KGB double-encrypted code. The 2200 Venona messages revealed a large KGB spy ring with code names that would later be identified as Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, scientist Klaus Fuchs (who gave the atomic bomb data to Ruth Werner at Oxford in 1941 that allowed the Russians to begin their A-bomb project in 1943 under physicist Igor Vasilievich Kurchatov), machinist David Greenglass, and especially Harvard scientist Theodore Alvin Hall code-named ''Mlad'' revealed in the 1997 book Bombshell
March 8, 1943 - The German Navy switched to an Enigma with four rotors. "Even a shift on 8 March 1943 by the Kriegsmarine to an Enigma using four rotors instead of just three did not halt Bletchley, astonishingly enough, for more than a few days. Eventually, the Allies were able to pinpoint and sink the submarine fuel ships, as well as the attack U-boats themselves, and so with ULTRA'S help were able to win decisively this most decisive of battles." (Kahn)
April 18, 1943 - "Communications intelligence contributed in two other major ways to the Allies' Pacific victory. It stepped up American submarine sinkings of the Japanese merchant fleet by one third. This cutting of Japan's lifelines was, Premier Hideki Tojo said after the war, one of the major factors that defeated Japan. And, secondly, it made possible in 1943 the dramatic mid-air assassination of Admiral Yamamoto." (Kahn)
July 15, 1943 - Sigsaly digital telephone system between Pentagon and Selfridges Department Store in London, with extensions to Churchill's War Cabinet Rooms and Roosevelt's White House.
Oct. 9, 1943 - The Purple code, broken by William Friedman at SIS in 1940, allowed the U.S. to read the dispatches of Oshima in Germany and learn Hitler's plans. "U.S. army and navy codebreakers, led by William F. Friedman, one of the greatest cryptanalysts of all time, began attacking this top-level Japanese system around the beginning of 1939. In August of 1940, after 20 months of work that in other fields would be worthy of a Nobel Prize, they submitted their first completely solved PURPLE message. The PURPLE solution could not prevent the Pearl Harbor attack. Nor did it help much in the war in the Pacific, where the diplomats had little to do. It made its greatest contribution in the war in Europe. For it enabled the Allies to read the messages of Japan's ambassador and military attaché in Germany as they reported on Hitler's capabilities and plans. . . . On 9 October 1943 the Allies read a message of a few days earlier in which Baron Hiroshi Oshima, the Japanese ambassador, reported that he had recently visited Hitler in his East Prussia headquarters. Among many other items of interest, Hitler told him that 'I am inclined to believe' that the Allies would land in the Balkans instead of moving north in Italy." (Kahn )
Jan. 1, 1944 - Anthony Blunt was a Soviet spy inside Bletchley Park and told the Russians that the Enigma code was broken, but most of the information provided by this "fourth man" in Britain's Cambridge spy ring led by Kim Philby (with Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean, and the mysterious "fifth man" John Cairncross who leaked information about Bletchley Park codebreaking to the Russians, and whose identity was unknown until 1990), including the real plans for D-Day, was not used by the Soviets.
June 1, 1944 - Bletchley Park had developed Colossus I by 1943, one of the early electronic computers. Its successor, Colossus II, went into operation on June 1, 1944, confirming that Hitler expected the D-Day invasion at Calais, not Normandy. Another electronic computer, the Harvard Mark I developed by Howard Aiken and IBM in 1944 helped the US Navy to compute mathematical and navigation tables. George Stibitz at Bell Telephone Laboratories developed tracking and aiming devices for anti-aircraft guns by 1944 from his Model-K telephone relay developed in 1937. German engineer Konrad Zuse had developed by 1941 a computer, the Z3, to design airplanes and missiles but it was kept secret and never exploited by the Germans. The pioneering ABC computer developed in 1939 by John V. Atanasoff and John Berry at Iowa State University influenced John Mauchly and J. Presper Eckert to start work on the ENIAC in 1943 at the University of Pennsylvania for the U.S. Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground.
Aug. 7, 1944 - The Ultra decryptions helped the Allies break out of the Normandy beachhead and win the battle of the Falais Gap after learning of Hitler's order of Aug. 7 to attack at Mortain. "The Americans had just broken out and were pouring through Avranches. The narrow opening created a target that tempted Hitler. He directed Field Marshal Gunther von Kluge, the commander in chief west, to pull at least four armoured divisions out of the front and hurl them against this bottleneck to close it. Hitler's order was, however, intercepted and solved." (Kahn)
Aug. 25, 1944 - The liberation of Paris was the culmination of the rapid pursuit and destruction of German forces in the Battle of France using knowledge from Ultra. "The completeness and continuity of this information was its chief contribution. In Normandy in 1944, for example, ULTRA was revealing routine daily Luftwaffe reports on the condition of airfields, the number and condition of anti-aircraft guns, the number of planes that could fly, unit strengths. It disclosed the location and movements of specific divisions, the subordination and transfer of units, the boundaries between units - once enabling the U.S. 7th Army to foresee and then to stop cold a German counterattack in Alsace. It gave insights into personnel losses and problems - the death in an air raid of the chief of staff and other officers of Panzer Gruppe West, the weak-kneed response of the commander of the Cherbourg garrison to Hitler's command to hold out like Gneisenau at Kolberg. ULTRA seemed to reveal every single detail of enemy activity. The thousands of bits of information that it provided eased thousands of decisions for Allied commanders and helped them optimize their resources in thousands of cases. Said the U.S. 7th Army intelligence officer after one particularly good morsel arrived: 'You know, this just isn't cricket!" Altogether, ULTRA let the Allies advance into Germany with far more speed than otherwise." (Kahn)
Sept. 12, 1944 - The USS Pampanito carried the Sigaba machine and was able to locate and attack a Japanese convoy out of Singapore. "One form of the American SIGABA (ECM, or 'electric code machine', in its Navy version) used no fewer than ten rotors at a time, five to create the electrical maze, five for moving the others in a much more irregular way than gears could. A cryptologist has said that the SIGABA was 'a generation ahead' of the Enigma." (Kahn)
1945 - By the end of the war, the code-breaking organizations in Britain and the U.S. were centralized and tightly coordinated, unlike the dispersed organization in Germany. "The army, the navy, and the air force each had its own unit, though there was rather more justification for that. But this multiplicity spread the available manpower, which was scarce to begin with, very thin. And it diffused the codebreaking effort. Contrast this with the concentration of effort at Bletchley Park, Britain's sole codebreaking agency, and with that in America, where the army and navy codebreaking units worked in the closest co-operation. There was some co-operation in Germany, of course. But it did not overcome the lethal effects of dispersion, which stemmed ultimately from Hitler's assigning duplicate responsibilities to his underlings so that he could retain ultimate control. The charismatic nature of his leadership enabled him to do this in many areas of government. It facilitated his rule - but it devastated his war effort, including codebreaking. . . . The Allies put better men into cryptology than the Germans. Bletchley Park was an unbelievable galaxy of talent. All American recruits were given an IQ test; those who scored the highest were proposed for cryptologic work. This resulted in extraordinarily high brainpower in codebreaking units. The American army agency could have staffed a first-class university in all departments, one of its leaders said. No such recruiting seems to have taken place for German codebreaking." (Kahn)
Jacob (the military one)m may well have appointed Richard Dimbleby as BBC War Correspondent, with the manner of an oiled slug, and checked carefully that his broadcasts toed the Jewish propaganda line.
*why the pact? I think to buy time. England and France declared war [give date] [give time of fall of France] [give times for Mussolini] Both AH and S were dictators, but to maximise white deaths they had to prepare on both sides. Quote Joachim Hoffman Stalin's War etc with page on arming - completely diff assessment from Read and Fisher
Churchill's Character and Clues
[ Top of page ]
Clive PONTING Irving not indexed. 'major revisionist biography ... [Churchill] wanted to sterilise ... over 100,000 'mentally degenerate' Britons... [Churchill] was racist, disliked democracy, did not believe in social progress and preferred rule by a small aristocratic elite ... wanted a pre-emptive nuclear strike on the Soviet Union. ... widely disliked and distrusted by hi political colleagues... challenges many accepted views ... role in the 1930s in opposing appeasement..' Oddly, Jews and Holocaust are not indexed, though Ponting seems to be a believer (p 718) '.. the full horror of what the Gestapo and the Nazi state had done..' Ponting's index has a few references to Stalin. His sources are PRO archives and the multi-volume official biography. He thanks Martin Gilbert, for no clear reason. Family connections - aristocracies and jews with money from undisclosed sources, with more or less arranged matches, and children with nannies - Churchill said to have lifelong attachment to a Mrs Everest. The book is obviously an irrelevance to serious revisionism. But I'll quote a few extracts:
405 1939 history of the English speaking world Maurice Ashley, John Wheldon, George Young, Gen Edmonds, Alan Bullock, William Deacon as p.a. Ponting no idea of funding - focus group Anti-Nazi council. focus for the defence of freedom and peace' 5 members listed
Godfrey, director of naval intelligence--
to get his own way he used every device and brought the whole battery of his ingenious, tireless and highly political mind to bear on the point at issue. His battery of weapons included persuasion, real or simulated anger, mockery, vituperation, tantrums, ridicule, derisions, abuse and tears, which he would aim at anyone who opposed him or expressed a view contrary to the he had already formed, sometimes on quit trivia; questions. p 411
The P.M. cannot say 'Yes' or 'No'. Instead, he makes a long speech, of which, 5 mins later, he produce a slightly differently worded version. ... How have we conducted this war with the P.M. spending hours of his own and other people's time simply drivelling, welcoming every red herring so as only to have the pleasure of more irrelevant, redundant talk'