Gerard Menuhin
Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil (2015, revised 2016). Review: Rae West Published by Castle Hill Books, UK and codoh.comThis book seems to have been revised once, and have two ISBNs as a result
‘I rather fear the entire Jewish sob story from its inception is a lie.’ Gerard Menuhin has written a revisionist book (largely relating to banking, both World Wars, and the Holohoax story). He is a 'Jew' or 'Half-Jew', son of a famous father. What's going on here?
First, let me summarise the probable history of 'Jews' to date:–
Jews have a different model of a nation from most other people. The Mediterranean is the world's biggest and calmest inland sea, dotted with islands, and with timber at its east. Intelligent design permitted shipping of loads much larger than could be moved inland. Whoever controlled ships (call them Phoenicisans, or 'Jews') visited to ports of many countries, and established contacts locally, and established families who could be brought up resembling the locals—same language, same accent, similar appearance—plus the magical ability to bring in exotic products, and take away local things.
Such a 'nation' is not confined geographically to land. It is spread out, a network of localities, a thalassocracy united by sea lanes, multiple ports in contact with each other, a distributed layer among nations. News: weaknesses, opportunities, assets of countries with which they deal, would be exchanged in their secret common language.
There must have been disputes over such things as food and water, valuable metal ores, land ownership rights, ownership of buildings, costs, types of payments and moneys. These must have been small matters, in comparison with events of recent centuries. However, note that a distributed network has the advantage of collaboration with many locations; it may have associates in some or all of those locations, leading to increased combined strength, which could be kept secret, or at least difficult to prove.
Since about 1492, there was a slow shifting away from Europe to a new centre of gravity nearer the Americas. Helped by science and technology, 'Jews' seem to have specialised in subversion, along with collaborators. For example, Amsterdam Jews collaborated to fund Cromwell against Charles I, when they funded cannon makers and soldiery. The outcome was the so-called 'Bank of England', which, by issuing paper money, impoverished non-Jewish Britons.
To this day, when non-Jews are told of war between A and B, they think in simple terms: A beat B and rules them, or vice versa. BUT War between A and B in fact is war between (A + Jews in A) versus (B + Jews in B). Jews are a third combatant, in secret, the secrecy maintained by bribes, violence, and blackmail. This needs control over news and information to operate. Jews gained control of news agencies, news and book publishing, and, later, radio and film and TV and Internet. The Jewish effortless capacity for lying has dominated in all big wars, including the Thirty Years' War, the US War between the States, and both World Wars, and wars of domination including the attack on Vietnam. Most of the participants—including many high rank in the military—hadn't a clue as to the part taken by Jews.
It's possible that for example whites genetically evolved to understand local things, but lagged in the ability to process less immediate ideas and words. But perhaps this is teachable: many people now know (one example) that the 'Russian' Revolution was a putsch by Jews, funded at first by Jews in New York.
A lot of evidence suggests Jews are genetically inclined to mass murder of rivals; in both WW1 and WW2 they killed 'goyim'. Consider the deaths; consider if they were necessary. Another object may have been to establish Israel, though genetically this may well fail. An important aspect of WW1 and WW2 was poor communication and linguistic incompetence, by allies and their masses of ignorant cannon fodder. All Jews needed to do was weaken defences, bribe traitors, spy on commands, delay actions they disliked, direct money to temporary allies and arms makers, and control propaganda to every group. By the Second World War, most of the German and Japanese 'High Command' orders were intercepted. Bletchley Park was full of Jews. Vast numbers of documents were taken into storage to keep the truth hidden. There were vast numbers of deaths; propaganda in the form of war films and books ensured most of the survivors had no clue what had happened.
Second: Short Version Review of Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil –
It has to be said there's not much original material here, unless you include fact of the Jew-related authorship. Gerard Menuhin has ransacked material (aided by Internet—he has about twenty years of online history to search). His book resembles Hitchcock's Synagogue of Satan but is illustrated and not chronologically linear. On the other hand, so much information is appearing, through the mists of Jewish lies, that almost everyone will find new materials. Gold stolen from Ukraine, and Jews and the Moldavian Savings Bank, for example. The book is available free online, from Castle Hill Publishers: click here. I assume this arrangement was acceptable to Gerard Menuhin. Not everyone likes reading on screen from portable documents.There are inevitable omissions. For example the movement to free Eire now looks like secretly-funded thugs taking money in exchange for treachery. And the poison-dwarf Kissinger's destruction of Vietnam—not forgetting simple Americans and scientists—is unmentioned. Probably the biggest issue now is what worldwide Jews did from 1914 to 1945; in my view the whole catastrophe was the work of Jews and their collaborators.
Anyone who has never read serious revisionist work ought to benefit from this book. Expect something like a continual bombardment.
The practicalities aren't considered by Gerard Menuhin. It's obvious that creation of large amounts of free, fake money has to be removed from 'Jews'. There has to be action on Synagogues, the Talmud, and general awareness of 'Jewish' frauds. I doubt if censoring the Talmud would help—it's been tried, and one has to suspect that book burnings in the past, for example by the Church, were carried out simply to hide the contents. If information spreads, there will probably be groups of unattractive whites who want to join Jews and Masons and 'Common Purpose' and political parties and the BBC and junk Jew media. Conversely, some Jews may try to reverse their habits. It will be necessary to be secret and develop intelligence against 'Jews', and remove them from influential posts. At the end of my review, I've put notes on weakening and removing 'Jewish' power. At present, 'Jews' seem intent on raising the proportion of blacks in the world to unprecedented levels; maybe the world will become so incompetent that Jewish legal documents and titles will be disregarded. Maybe there will be a slow evolution; or maybe a sudden change. Perhaps competent historians, if there are any, might examine the results of large-scale bank failures, and/or large scale military mutinies or new policy pioneers. At least they'll have computers to help them.
RW 1 Dec 2019
Gerard Menuhin's book (I think originally written in French) is long and unquestionably contains many portions of the staple diet of revisionists. One of the few books on the subject written by Jews, it might be expected to specifically influence so-called 'Jews'. (Menuhin says he earned a place ‘on a list of 7,000 Jews who have made themselves unpopular with their fellows’). It's possible for example that Menuhin's book may be part of Jewish controlled opposition, omitting the most serious charges against Jews, or omitting serious weaknesses of Jews. I'll try to ensure this is a serious review, and my summary (above) is a guide to my views.
Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil: Recognize the True Enemy and Join to Fight Him has four chapters, in more-or-less descending size order:– I THWARTED: HUMANITY’S LAST GRASP FOR FREEDOM | II IDENTIFIED: ILLUMINATION OR THE DIAGNOSTIC OF DARKNESS | III EXTINGUISHED: CIVILIZATION | IV FINAL STAGE: COMMUNIST VASSALAGE. And a bibliography of English titles. And a three-column index of names.
Glancing at online reviews, I'm fairly sure the first edition had less illusive titles, including Hitler, for example; but if so I haven't been able to relocate them. And there's no signposting in the book, nothing in the way of an 'analytical table of contents'. Menuhin is a discursive type, like a speaker who prefers his own voice to clarity. His book is punctuated by many of the quotations familiar to revisionists (in English), found, for example, in Hitchcock's Synagogue of Satan. The hooknosed Rothschilds at their games, Balfour, International Red Cross figures for camps, David Irving on Dresden, Arthur Koestler on Khazars, Orwell 1984, Ernst Zündel. My own website may have loaned him a section by Francis Dvornik. Other names, which revisionists will recognise as furnishing short quotations include: Cicero, Voltaire, Rabbi Reichhorn, John Swinton (US press), Henry Wickham Steed, Nesta Webster ('conspiracy' histories), Arthur Lane, Denis Fahey, Emil Ludwig, Louis T McFadden, Truman (diary), Charlotte Iserbyt, Jüri Lina (USSR Jews). And Henry Strakosch, Count Cherep-Spiridovich.
An interesting reference book, no doubt very secret, is given by Menuhin as Americans of Jewish Descent, by Jewish historian Malcolm H. Stern, supposedly a book weighing 10 pounds, of which only 550 consecutively numbered copies were printed. This sounds like an American version of Johann Eisenmenger's (two-volume) Entdecktes Judenthum.
Unmentioned people—often a reliable indicator of an author's awareness—include BBC when trying to be serious, Austin App, Arthur Butz, Doug Christie, Andrew Hitchcock, Fred Leuchter's work, Kevin Macdonald, Bertrand Russell on Vietnam War Crimes and 'nuclear weapons'. There are some Talmudic descriptions passim, mostly of the sort opposing Christianity, rather than deeper material.
I was disappointed to find Miles Mathis missing, but perhaps he's too recent, though his Beer Hall Putsch was online by early 2016. I'd recommend readers check Mathis' writings on Marx, Lindbergh, Ezra Pound, Douglas Reed and others; Gerard Menuhin is a bit naive about them. Hexzane527 is another excellent Jews in World Wars revisionist, so far rather suppressed. You might like my site searcher combining both Mathis and Hexzane527. (Mathis' science work is excluded).
I couldn't find any attempt to decode the Talmud to disclose the roots of Jewish policies and attitudes. Thus e.g. Kol Nidre is unmentioned, the attitude to non-Jews—including death to researchers—implied but not discussed, the Jewish attitude to veiled threats undiscussed. Michael A Hoffman II, the only burrower into the Talmud I know of, is in Menuhin only as a reporter on trailblazing Holohoax trials. Hoffman's Talmudic researches aren't mentioned.
Menuhin says nothing about his own modus operandi when it comes to writing, but it seems to be the 'flypaper technique' of picking up bits and pieces. Arguably, when trying to present a fairly complicated and unexpected set of truths, this is a very poor technique. On the other hand, it accurately reflects the deluge of influences on populations subjected to Jewish lies; so perhaps it is suited to its purpose.
I THWARTED: HUMANITY’S LAST GRASP FOR FREEDOM starts with Menuhin's personal life, including his schooling in Germany and Britain (he went to Eton), and his parents' attitudes and disagreements. He digresses into the astounding scandal of Silverstein, other New York Jews, and 9/11—the ‘N.Y. World Trade Tower incidents of 2001’—I refuse to use that ridiculous American abbreviation, whose self-importance assumes that the entire world is fixated on their country... which ‘allowed the “Global War on Terrorism,” the “Patriot Act,” “Homeland Security,” X-rays and lawful groping at airports to come into being’. But he omits the wars and the resulting destruction from Libya to Iraq and no doubt other areas.
Then he moves roughly from the end of the First World War, to the end of the Second. The 'six million' figure comes in about here, and material on what later was called 'the Holocaust' by the tremendous Jewish propaganda machine, and material on and by Churchill and Eisenhower. There's a section on Hitler, and a section on Germany. Menuhin asks in effect why is Hitler still considered important after all this time? There have been many—well, he presumably means dictators or killers. Menuhin doesn't make the sublimely obvious point that Jews control the media; if Hitler is discussed, it's because the Jews who dictate to the simple public want it.
Menuhin treats Stalin and Hitler as more or less equivalent, but opposite, juggling and jostling and positioning and fighting like kings in chess on opposite sides. Stalin as a Jew is out of his range; Hitler as a Jew even more so.
At least three points are raised spectrally, but left unanswered.
First, of course, Stalin and his henchmen plus Russians forced into subservience killed vast numbers of Slavs in the USSR empire; far more than Germans.
Secondly, it's been pointed out—and this is perhaps the point at which Jews will obstruct more fanatically than any other—there is plenty of evidence that international Jews controlled enough of the NSDAP to ensure Germany lost the Second World War, in a manner that maximised goy deaths. I could find nothing other than the usual Jew media presentation by Menuhin of Hitler. Or for that matter any consideration of restitution to Germany, or restitution to Russians, or Ukrainians.
My third point is Menuhin's alarmist chapter title. Jewish mythology relies on a 'Moschiah' ('Messiah') to appear. Menuhin seems to assume the world is at its last gasp, but he never examines whether a world run by a minority of fanatics and liars could be stable. Could such a world be technically competent; or—in my view worrying likely—would it subside into violence and incompetence and pollution and loss of literacy and legality?
Part II IDENTIFIED: ILLUMINATION OR THE DIAGNOSTIC OF DARKNESS (What?) This is the longest chapter. It veers from topic to topic in roller-coaster fashion. I'll try to reproduce the feeling:–
We have Maria Teresa of Austria in 1777, on Jews and ‘fraud, usury and moneylending and ... all deeds which an honorable man despises’. (These include prostitution). Many revisionists misunderstand usury to mean interest—a misdirection—when it includes taking over properties by forcing debt, and so on. And many revisionists think Jews and Christians were rigidly opposed; in fact the Church accepted Jewish money manipulations, tut-tutting ineffectually when people complained.
We have a good account of the massing of forces leading to the privately-owned ‘Federal Reserve’, with Jekyll Island, funding selected candidates of the Democrats or Republicans. But much of this material is taken from a video called The Money Masters of 1996; this was before Youtube existed. And seems to be anonymous. Not a very good idea since videos can be edited to mean something very different.
Then an 1891 to 1894 operation, by banks in the USA: ‘On Sept, 1, 1894, we will not renew our loans under any consideration. On Sept. 1 we will demand our money. We will foreclose and become mortgagees in possession. We can take two-thirds of the farms west of the Mississippi and thousands of them east of the Mississippi as well, at our own price… We may as well own three-fourths of the farms of the West and the money of the country. Then the farmers will become tenants as in England…’
Then Metapedia, quoted on making Jews take surnames.
Like the Bank of England, the name of the Bank of the United States was deliberately chosen to hide the fact that it was privately controlled. And like the Bank of England, the names of the investors in the Bank were never revealed.
In 1861 came the American Civil War and Lincoln’s battle to save the Union. “It is not to be doubted, I know of absolute certainty,” Bismarck declared, “that the division of the United States into two federations of equal power was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained as one bloc and were to develop as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset the capitalist domination of Europe over the world.”
Lincoln's 'assassination' is accepted at face value by Menuhin, probably wrongly.
From this point on, [1863] the U.S. money supply would be created in parallel with an equivalent quantity of debt by bankers buying U.S. government bonds, which they used as reserves for National Bank Notes, the nation’s new form of money, instead of by direct debt-free issue by the government, as were Lincoln’s Greenbacks. The banks got interest from the government on the bonds and from borrowers of their Bank Notes—thus almost doubling their interest income. {I wonder if Menuhin understood this passage - RW]
[After the small matter of WW2] There followed ... the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC; 1951), Euratom (1957), the Treaty of Rome and the European Economic Community (EEC; 1958), the Maastricht Treaty (1993) and European citizenship, the single market, the Schengen Agreement (1995), monetary union (1999), in full force since 2002, and the Treaty of Lisbon (2009); accompanied by the hordes of bureaucrats in institutions
Then the French Revolution and Russian Revolution, with a lot of mentions of cruelty, and some mention of Jews.
Then 'Islamophobia' as of course Jews seemed to think Muslims invasion of white countries was good for them. Menuhin doesn't seem to notice the fact that Jews were aiming at population replacement, or something.
Soros (Gyorgy Schwartz) could and did in 1992—making $U.S. 1 billion in the process.” (Sydney Morning Herald, November 15, 1997).
On Soros, Menuhin continues: ‘If the Bank of England is still private and run by the same types that founded it, Soros could have been enabled by insider information to enrich himself through that gamble, allowing him subsequently to fund such subversive “philanthropic” ventures as the Open Society Institute.’ Shrewd comment from Menuhin: my best guess is that Gordon Brown, who sold Britain's gold at basement prices, co-operated with Soros; if you're dealing with a few billion, presumably some people take it seriously, even if MPs and Civil Servants don't. I'd guess the slack-jawed homosexual traitor, Brown, in effect handed electronic money to Soros. Brown is still lying: see this short video. It seems Joe Lewis was another Soros type; maybe another Jew from Hungary. Now I think of it, Jews from Hungary have been two types: some were chemical engineers, and joined the nuclear fraud in the USA, and others collaborate with USSR Jews as torturers and dictators. A handy guide to Jews in different countries would have been useful, but isn't in Menuhin.
Part III EXTINGUISHED: CIVILIZATION The extinguished civilization appears to be mostly Germany, or perhaps the whole of Europe, and Gerard Menuhin's life there and in the world. The National Zeitung and Töben's Adelaide Institute (I emailed Töben about an Australian called Eric Butler, but he never replied). Then laws against free speech, which of course are to be applied as Jews want, and are impossible to draft honestly. Menuhin lists Wolfgang Fröhlich, Horst Mahler, Ernst Zündel, Gerd Honsik, Germar Rudolf, Sylvia Stolz as jailed in Germany; there must be continual threats and menaces: it is an occupied country. Menuhin traces these laws in the USA back to the Smith Act of 1940.
Switching to the 'Great War', Menuhin says ‘If one man may be held accountable for instigating the First World War it is French Prime Minister Raymond Poincaré’. Well, maybe. He's sympathetic about dead soldiery: ‘These expendable servicemen were ignorant perhaps of the greater issues, but infinitely more worthy representatives of their race, the human race, than the subhumans who sent them to die for no pressing reason at all.’ He writes of ‘heavily-armed but bankrupt nations’. Most of the time they did nothing beyond providing food, uniforms, cheap housing and so on. The way modern productivity is converted into nothing much is outside Menuhin's range.
Menuhin quotes PEN, the group supposedly helping serious writing. He doesn't seem to realise that PEN is just another fake.
Menuhin writes on Germany and the CIA and Merkel, revealing she's a Jew from Poland, or something.
The 'Great War', out of sequence, does not treat Jews as another belligerent, and is therefore not much use.
‘In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, ship-building, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press… They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers. (Congressional Record of February 9, 1917...)
After the 'Great War', Germany had a Jewish 'Communist Party'. Hitler is known to have spent time there, deemed 'incomprehensible' by a commentator. But now we know better.
Part IV FINAL STAGE: COMMUNIST VASSALAGE. It must be said that Gerard Menuhin likes his clich&eacte;s. "Throwing good money after bad" he writes somewhere, while showing the money is all bad. Just as the unexamined life is said to be not worth living, the unexamined cliché is not worth writing. He writes: ‘The only winners of the World Wars were the politicians and bankers who instigated them.’ Really? Many in American (‘with its hopelessly ignorant and uneducated population’) thought the 1950s were a wonderful time. The Occidental Observer has many commenters of that type.
Gerard Menuhin's conclusion (mid-Chapter IV) is:
and he adds:
Menuhin seems to have found a final batch of Jewish harm, emerging in his book as painful unsequenced extracts one after the other:– Barbara Marx Hubbard | 'Carnegie Endowment for Perpetual Peace' | Illuminati and Weishaupt | Fish Report on Communism, 1930 | A Warburg wanting world government | ugliness of Jews | the Book of Isaiah | Jews killed Jews to 'create' Israel | Chabad-Lubawitsch movement | in the fall of 1917 the British government decided to transfer a considerable part of the forces fighting on the French battlefields to the Near East in order to drive the Turks, a German ally, out of Palestine | Ariel Sharon on killing Arabs | Begin and Irgun terror | Dieter Eckart | English ivy on oak trees | Genetically Modified Organism trade | EU police want a kill switch on every car | money is almost a joke | western Europe prides itself on having abolished the death penalty, but...
Peace among humans should be the norm on Earth. Yet to achieve this normal state requires all our energy.
WHAT CAN BE DONE TO WEAKEN AND DESTROY JEWISH POWER?
To start with, honesty is needed. We should honestly assess Jewish power. After all, many countries have influenced our world: Persia, Greece, Italy, France, Britain, Germany just in the western area. There's no reason to suppose another bunch on different principles shouldn't have effects. And it is not honest to ut all the blame on Jews.
And, at least in my view, it's necessary to be honest about whites. In the previous few centuries, whites have burned, bombed, stolen from, starved and raped other whites. And they have burned, bombed, stolen from, starved and raped non-whites. Menuhin takes it as a given that if Jews pay with their fake money, whites and others will do more or less what they're told. If this remains true, it's difficult to see how improvements can happen. There have to be ways around this. Probably serious punishments will be necessary, including deaths and deaths of associates. And on a large scale. And with full retribution.
In any developed state of society, it is likely that some group could enlarge its fortunes at the expense of another group. There is potential instability, and this ought to be analysed scientifically.
Robert Malthus is laughed at by Jews, who regard themselves as secret arbiters of life and death. But Malthusian principles will be needed. Consider the huge population explosion of blacks, for example.
As the truth about Jews spreads—if it does—there will be moves to take back assets, lands, money, education, and legal documents on ownership. If such things become clearly successful, there may be a general rush, spreading across the world. I hope so. Because Jews operate in packs worldwide, anything which weakens links between them, ridicules their mythology, isolates them in Israel or elsewhere, prevents them disowning debts, reverses damage they have done, prevents liars and traitors and thugs and war criminals, is likely to help.
Just a few more comments on Jews. Jews, as Kevin MacDonald repeatedly states, boost each other, and occasionally boost 'goyim' who tell lies in favour of Jews. There are quite a number of short 'reviews' praising this book in undeserved style. Probably this is natural to Jews. I'd guess the reports on Yehudi Menuhin were often of this type: John Ogdon told David Irving that Jews promote 'their own'. I would suggest readers ought to be sceptical about the value of the provenance of this Shame the Devil.
... But education is not about numbers, it's about reasoning. Universities used to be centres of higher learning. Only those with exceptional intellectual credentials were admitted to them. With the proliferation of 'new universities', came the preordained discovery of all kinds of new and (of course) politically correct subjects and courses that did not exist only 30 years ago, and hardly merit serious consideration, let alone formal recognition, today. They enable almost any Johnny-come-lately to scrape into a so-called university and emerge with a degree. Now, he can benefit financially from his expertise in psychology, for instance, by determining before a court that a pedophile and murderer may be freed after therapy.
I hate to be depressing on the subject of British Universities c. 1900. How wonderful they were, weren’t they? — The sad truth is that Britain was as subservient to Jews as now. Oxbridge did nothing about the Jewish menace and provided no help or guidance in the 20th century. Look up e.g. Hilaire Belloc on the utter unawareness of WW1 Brits. The ‘best’ were smug and out of touch with the policies taking shape around them; Bertie Russell was smug, Keynes was possibly a collaborator. Don’t fall into the trap of considering that they were wonderful, except at supplying lifetime incomes to nonentities. And don’t forget London University, set up as a discreet Jewish centre in the 19th century.
Final perhaps irrelevant note: I watched a TV interview of the most shallow type, on 'Elton Hercules John' (eh, John?) and noticed that an 'AIDS' 'charity' supposedly processed about half a billion currency units. 'AIDS' of course is just another Jewish fraud. As far as I've checked, his real name is or was Reg Dwight, and his mother's name seems scrubbed. Pinner is a harmless-sounding suburb of London, but has a synagogue where race legislation (designed to flood Britain with aliens) was drafted. Oddly, a TV ad for a 'candy bar' showed Elton John being turned into a black; very odd.
I'm not even certain that the person interviewed was the singer, and not just an actor with absurd specs, bearing in mind the fake Stephen Hawking. Music colleges include in their exams scores in the style of Bach or whoever, and no doubt pop songs are part of the same educational procedure. Words of the ethereal low-meaning type (Gee I sure get low when the sun goes down) were his staple. Probably also he had a role of minimising the harm done by drugs, and the harm done by homosexuality. This sort of thing spreads like mould under Jewish influence.
(Around Christmas, TV programmes lean to sentimentalism of a depressing type: watching Queen, with emphasis on 'Freddy Mercury', it struck me how he surrounded himself with dimbos: drivers, deservedly obscure people described as 'actors' or 'celebrities' or something, Jewish 'journalists', but nobody able to comment on the fraud of AIDS. His 1991 death pre-dated Internet, and pre-dated Hotmail (1996), but didn't pre-date the richly profitable Terrence Higgins Trust (1982). Jewish frauds all have a lot in common.)
© Rae West. Uploaded 1 Dec 2019.