Talk with Martin Emander & Patrik Holmqvist of Cui Bono, who are in Gothenburg, Sweden.
With Simon Shack.

11 Dec 2023 19:00 CET = 18:00 GMT

These podcast notes by Raeto West   11 & 20 & 27 Dec & 30 Dec 2023

Here's the talk, cui bono & Rae West stereo mp3 file. About 2¼ hours.

• Apologies for my rather poor delivery. This conversation was unscripted, though I did email the equivalent of a scribbled note to them. Which suggested four parts: [1] Sweden and revisionism; [2] How HTML websites are done, for people disliking WordPress; [3] What's on big-lies.org, and its hit rates; [4] Speculations on Jews, discoveries about them and the future.
      My Swedish hosts seemed more interested in Simon Shack's Tycho Brahe model of the solar system, and I couldn't get them to stick to my suggestions.

• I didn't mention that I studied physics, and especially chemistry, to quite a high level; and got 'O' level English and maths aged 14. I didn't do much biology; only three A-levels were allowed. I did little history or religious stuff, perceiving that they weren't serious. I didn't mention my English Methodist dad, or Swiss Romansch-speaking mum. I haven't studied my family tree in detail, but there may be Jews there. (The Swiss part of my family includes surnames Meier and Zappa.)
• I forgot to mention that my book on the Commodore PET/CBM is online as a PDF file here. It was uploaded without my permission. (Jim Butterfield in Canada had piracy problems too). I met Anton Felton (mentioned in Clark's book on Bertrand Russell) with unfortunate outcomes. The whole field of technical writing is mostly unexplored. My write-up of the 6502 and 6510 chips as far as I know are unequalled and widely used in the 8-bit industry. Part of the reason for feeble technical explanation is simply that good explanations can be copied.
• I forgot to mention that I insisted on saving Hillman's films, which were stored at Surrey University in reel form and had been forgotten. I digitised them from VHS tape and put them online. So if you've heard of Hillman, it's probably because of me. My 1920x1080 video of the 'Living Cell' (1.45GB) was my most popular video, after Lords of the Nukes (1.7GB).
      Hillman and Sartory's 1980 book Living Cell is the most downloaded of my PDFs.
• I mentioned the split between Sweden and Norway after 1900, before 1914, and the likely Jewish influence. My piece is Why were Eire, Spain, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, and Turkey Neutral in World War 2? is (I hope) in the style of Hexzane527, including one of his maps, but not by him. The war planning by Jews is deep and long and unknown to ordinary 'historians'.
      On Norway, the Anders Breivik supposed killings were just another fake. See e.g. Norway-Utoya-island in nuke-lies.org, explaining Jewish hate of Norway. Or Miles Mathis' happy1.pdf
• Here are my two vox pop interviews: Vox Pops: Holohoax?   |   Vox pops: nukes
• Here's nukelies.org, the home page of the restored nuke lies forum of 2011-2012. Without my work this forum would probably have been permanently lost.
• Here's my articles on Jews page (it's very long!) which has Swedish information.
      On Sweden, here's Why is Sweden 'Multicultural?' a video by Jonas Nilsson (about 1¾ hours) on this site in case the original disappeared. In Swedish with rather faint English subtitles. Very detailed. Starts 1975. Includes the well-known clip of now-believed-to-be-dead Barbara Spectre. Jew-aware.
• big-lies.org/sv/ is the brief page for Swedish readers translated by DeepL on my site. There are similar pages for other languages, including Norge, Suomalainen, Danske, and Russian, Chinese, German, French, Italian, Spanish.
• My science revisionism page (long) is here and there's a 15 minute video (2016) giving an overview of the whole subject, if 'science revisionism' can be considered a subject..
      How Much of Modern Physics is a Fraud? jointly written by Rae West & Phil Holland
• I didn't mention that David Irving's trial transcript, made with typing-style equipment for such trials, of his prosecution of the ridiculous Lipstadt & Penguin, was put online by me. It's here, where there are links to each day. The final day was day 33, the significance of which escaped me at the time. Here's a zip file day033.zip.   I don't know of any other comparable presentation of the trial from Irving's side. However, the full secret legal side, and the typical Jewish behind-the-scenes planning, remains unclear.
• Dr Lorraine Day on Jews in US medicine (< 5 mins) is what I mentioned (talking with Jim Laffrey, who unfortunately didn't have the wit to explain what lies she attributed to Fauci and the rest of them. Lorraine Day is reported to have died.
• I should have said "All Jews think they are chosen—but some are more chosen than others" mimicking Orwell.
• My Abrahamic religions reviews include Sherwood's Fairchild Family, Moorman's History of the Church in England, and Clinton Dawkins's God Delusion—and many more
• Alan Norton's Drugs, Science, and Society early 1970s) is my review of a book which included the fallacies of injections. Published in
• On the BNP ('British National Party'), note that 'nations' to some extent, like 'democracy', are a Jewish construction. Many between-the-wars writers, even Jew-aware ones, said they fought in the 'Great War'; Nick Griffin used the Spitfire to promote WW2 as a Churchillian triumph. I've decided to drop references to the BNP since both Nick Griffin and his second-in-command Simon Darby haven't said enough about Jews and Freemasons.
• Here is my sprawling page on the Jewish victory of the Second World War, How the Master Race Won World War 2. As far as I know, the best writer on Jewish wartime influence is Francophonic, perhaps in France, nicknamed hexzane527. Here is my version of Hexzane527's files, which are rather hard to find
• AIDS/HIV as a fraud is discussed in this article—now rather old, but unanswered
• General science revisionism seems to have been pioneered by me.   Ivor Catt's book on techie employment was put online by me with written permission from him. It's light on secrecy and money, but has disconcerting insights
• Authorship fakes are part of my site, including the Shakespeare authorship issue and the Jane Austen issue. There's some discussion of ghost writers; Jesse Waugh and others; Private Eye (1960s mag in UK) is an example. Much of the story is Jew-related; though (for example) the De Vere Society is unlikely to face this issue, which connect with the entire complex of the build-up of Britain's sea power, the Reformation, wars with Holland and Spain, and Cromwell, the 'Bank of England', and the 'Holy Bible'.
• My large personal book collection includes key texts on viruses and virology in English. Including the fake rocket-like 'virus'. They are so small as to be difficult to detect—or, if thy don't exist, impossible to detect. I'd have liked a discussion on COVID with honest scientists but found nobody willing to discuss this
• I was unintentionally misleading, describing an ex as from Romania. Her family had been in Rhodesia for many years, and in fact I saw Rhodesia in happier times, but saw the transition, supposedly to black rule, in fact to Jew-supported puppetry.
• I mentioned Bluehost as a site host. In fact they deleted, without warning, old emails addressed to comment@big-lies.org, which was annoying. Possibly it's allowed in their terms and conditions, though
• Here's a special appeal to Miles Mathis.
• I have never (no special reason) watched Simon Shack's 2008 video September Clues but have to share doubts about his work, notably that his investigation into Jews and Jewish actors is inadequate to the subject. Shack's concentration on the Zapruder film of JFK has the same defect. This is why I think Miles Mathis is a better researcher. I've mirrored his non-science material here.
      Note that Mathis has a page of links, some of them on 9/11 (which he writes as 911). These links show the correct scepticism about 9/11.
      Both Swedes were keen to promote Shack's book on the Tychonean system, based on the Dane Tycho Brahe and with Kepler and Jews. I think it's unsound for several reasons–

1. The use of parallax seems absurdly out of scale. If 'fixed stars' are assumed to be millions of light-years away, i.e. at distances which take light itself millions of years to travel, parallax is hard to determine. It's true that (for example) Barnard's star and Proxima Centauri seem fast/ near, but the earth's orbit is insignificant as a yardstick.
2. Double stars feature largely in Shack's book, and he seems to think observations of them are scattered about and conclusively obvious. I doubt if this can be true though I agree it's likely that if multiple stars exist they're likely to be just pairs.
3. It's clear enough that Mercury and Venus orbit the sun—with good viewing conditions they are visible to the naked eye.
4. Before a few centuries past, only Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were visible. The asteroid belt, Neptune, and Uranus were too faint. Mars, if it's outside the earth's orbit, has, assuming one of Kepler's laws is correct, has a 'year' which means viewing it from earth leads to occasional retrograde motion; nothing surprising about that. There no evidence it's a 'brown dwarf' star unless a star is assumed to 'die' into a tiny ball about the size of earth. The asteroids look like the outcome of gravitational collapse&mdas;think of a demolished factory chimney, falling to earth and collapsing into several pieces, because the acceleration of the pieces differs. Then think of the same thing with a large planet between Mars and Saturn made to crumble. I doubt this is included in the Tychonic model.
5. The orbits of planets are (I believe) almost indistinguishable from circles if mapped. So the use of circles in computer simulations is not likely to show up serious differences.

• The search for patterns of behaviour in jews

1. Our two Swedes said nothing about one of the most important features of our times, namely the systematic evasion of all discussion of Jewish activities, which my site is largely about.
2. A good example is a couple of Occidental Observer pages, deciding that Jews look for "What's good for Jews" and decide only on that basis. For example, Jews in the USSR, the engineered Vietnam War, the massive fraud of 9/11, the Holocaust fake. But it's not simple to decide what's good for anyone or any group. This formulation seems to me to understate the cruelty and malice which characterises Jewish power activities.
3. Destructiveness of buildings, records, history, libraries, and any general evidence, is typical of Jews and a reason why so little genuine history survives.
4. The achievements of mankind, or of some of mankind, are the most impressive aspects of biological creatures on the planet. The achievements of Jews are also astonishing. But they rely, arguably, on verbal tricks and grandiose mis-statements, by such types as Simon Schama and Hannah Arendt and Susan Sontag and endless other so-called Jews.
5. One interesting trick is to impose Kings, or Presidents, or Chief Officers over people who are better qualified. A good example is the BBC, run by Jews who give control to such people as Schama. The unification of Italy and Germany are good examples. So is the United Nations and its offshoots, with heads appointed by Jews. Probably there are Talmudic explanations of such things. I hope there will be a change, comparable with the work of Wallace and Darwin on evolution, to detailed analysis and naming of these tricks, just as wars and political parties and football teams have analyses of events.
6. Another pattern is the use of rented thugs, as in early Christianity, early Islam, terrorists against Rome, teams of the 'Black Lives Matter' type. This is a version of using secret groups, such as Freemasons.
7. The fact that Jews historically in the Mediterranean were separated into groups in major cities established a pattern of causing damage, then leaving for fellow-Jews in other cities.
8. Mass migrations have been and are a feature of Jewish activities. Entire slave trades have been run by Jews. Mass migrations have been caused by fomenting wars to supply real or fake refugees.
9. I'd like these sorts of things to be identified and classified. And their net effects should be determined if possible. I noticed that E Hobsbawm, a Jewish 'historian', had a low opinion of Malthus. Presumably, given that Jews often fund wars, they've had a population-reducing effect. This sort of thing is part of serious study of Jews. Perhaps on a similar basis to zoological population studies. Here's my page on parasitism, which I mentioned in the talk.

-RW