For media reviews, of movies and TV (and further back, e.g. radio) try this link.
The above is a subset of a larger file, of general media and books, here. Here are some notes I made at the time, which people seem to like. Note increasing Jew awareness. British TV 1956-1997 The penetration by Jews is intricate, elaborate, and deceptive. And worldwide. Jewish Propaganda Books in Britain 1908-2000This version v. 22 Jan 2022. J A Hobson added 2 Feb 2021. [Home Page] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jewish Propaganda Books in Britain 1908-1993This page looks at Jewish propaganda, published in the UK, mostly unrecognised as such, and aimed to support Jewish massacres in what had been Russia, and make whites fight each others, mostly in Europe; and to promote Jewish mythologies and lies:I review Norman Angell's The Great Illusion, which was regarded as a serious argument for peace and pacifism. I discuss 'Penguin Specials', and the 'Left Book Club' of Victor Gollancz, and the fake opposition 'Right Book Club'. I also look at Watts's Thinker's Library (1929-1951) which was followed by Allen & Unwin paperbacks. Generally, all these were fake debates and took the Jewish line of Jewish authors. And I look at post-1945 Jewish/fellow-traveller triumphalist books. My piece on Thinking About Thinking surveys how-to-think books in the same period, and shows their limits.
The Jewish push towards wars was strong throughout this period; I've chosen 1908 as the starting date, when Norman Angell's The Great Illusion was published, to 1948, when the Left Book Club was closed, its work complete. I've included some material on war aims, and shown why these could not be honest. And an extract from Balfour, speaking about five years after his 'Declaration'. All this in my view is a part of the Five-Hundred Years War [Warning! Incomplete] between Jews and Christians, Jews and whites, Jews and Moslems, Jews and blacks, Jews and Chinese, and other groups, in combination. The timing is a bit arbitrary; I've selected the eighty years' war between Spain and Holland as the start: hence, 'Five-Hundred Years War'. This can be viewed as a genetic internal struggle within the entire human race, with damaging incursions of inbred monomaniac parasites into substrate societies as conditions favoured them. Population densities, genetic characteristics particularly of whites, and technical progress have so far favoured so-called Jews up to a point. How, if at all, this will end remains uncertain. After the establishing of Israel in 1948, Jewish activity concentrated on increasing the hold on the USA, partly by use of the fraud of 'nuclear weapons', and by the invention of the 'Cold War' (helped by the Jew Castro in Cuba), which had the function of ensuring the USSR would not be invaded, and the Jewish GULags not investigated. Media control enabled Jews to corrupt every aspect of American life, and to make more money from large-scale state activities, notably by profits from genocide in Vietnam, and by increasing government debt, from which Jews benefited since the paper money they printed recovered huge interest payments, and could largely be directed to what Jews considered were their interests. Later, the Holocaust myth was expanded as a vast money-making and propaganda scheme. All this postdates most of Angell's writings and is very unlikely to have affected them. However it's impossible to be sure of Angell's understanding: the six million figure, and discussions on subjugating Russia, were certainly discussed before his famous book. |
This is a long page. Here are Links:–
Jewish Propaganda in UK 1908-1993 - Overview NORMAN ANGELL The Great Illusion | Angell and the World (1908-1938) | Pacifism | Angell after 1914 | Angell's Writing Style | Missing Material | Doubtful Material | Changes in 1938 Edition | Other Books by Angell J A Hobson Unable to rework economics H G Wells: War Aims in World War 1
G D H Cole & M I Cole: The Intelligent Man's Review of Europe To-Day (1933)
Stanley Unwin & Others
Watts's Thinker's Library
Penguin Specials | More Penguin Books
Gollanczes in 19th & 20th centuries | Hilaire Belloc on Jews
Right Book Club: Faked. Controlled Opposition
1942 F K Bieligk ‘Fight for Freedom Publication’
British Way and Purpose 1942-1944. Official Army War Aims in World War 2
Nikolaus Pevsner. New Domesday Book of England 1951–1974
Typical spy 'faction'/thriller 1951
Darke East End Jew, in London Trade Union on Communism 1952
Victor Gollancz Ltd: New Outline of Modern Knowledge 1956
1969. Student Power Review of a Penguin Special
1971. Vietnam War Tribunal; years later. After Allen Lane's death. With brief notes on censorship of Jewish war aims
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ralph Norman Angell Lane THE GREAT ILLUSION - NOW• The Great Illusion was first published in 1908 (& on other publication dates before the 'Great War' starting 1914). It was the most advertised, discussed, and sold 'pacifist' book on supposed causes of wars.• A 1933 edition was rewarded with a 'Nobel Peace Prize' the following year. • The edition reviewed here was printed in December 1938 (described as 'The 1939 Edition'). It consisted of a long introduction, followed by an edited-down version of Angell's pre-Great War book. • Published by Penguin Books Warning: this is a full-on revisionist review, so far as information permits. Fake pacifist Jewish-concern book, which misled many peace-inclined people. Part of the Jewish propaganda leading to the Second World War with Germany. However, it had the merit of directing attention to economic causes of wars. Here I review Norman Angell's books, emphasising the way he switched to anti-Germanism, along with Jewish policy, in the 1930s. I have included notes on war aims, for both world wars, and the reasons that clear statements of them were impossible. I've found a speech of Balfour, made in 1920, and quoted from that. And information on 'Penguin Specials', and an appendix from C N Parkinson's Left Luggage (1967) on Victor Gollancz's so-called 'Left Book Club'. Radio—i.e. in Britain the BBC (British Broadcasting Company, nationalised and renamed the British Broadcasting Corporation in 1926, after the General Strike)—is not dealt with here. Nor are the daily press and magazines, moving pictures, lectures and public meetings, or explicit campaigns of violence. Angell and the World (1908-1938) [ Top of page ] This book (see photo) was a 'Penguin Special'—a series, which continued for many years, of books nominally intended to consider serious issues. In fact from today's viewpoint it obviously presented the Jewish view, insofar as this percolated to the various levels of people who considered themselves 'Jews'. Penguin to some extent supplemented and took over took over from the 'Left Book Club' of Victor Gollancz, (Victor Gollancz Ltd, London, Covent Garden), which ceased publishing in 1948. See below for the Left Book Club. Norman Angell is now almost a forgotten figure. His surname was Lane; possibly (this is a guess) he dropped the name after a scandal involving Homer Lane, a once-well-known figure in what might now be called 'alternative education'. I'm assuming that Lane was in fact a Jew, on evidence of his names (see the Avotaynu Jewish surname index), the obscurity of his early life, and his writings. Angell was a journalist, roughly equivalent to such people as Tony Benn, George Galloway, Dennis Skinner and others, but there's no modern equivalent, because the Jewish nuclear frauds have made Angell's military assumptions appear to be redundant. H G Wells's Experiment in Autobiography says Lord Northcliffe 'ran' Angell for a while, when it dawned upon Northcliffe's chaotically uninformed mind that newspaper proprietors have responsibilities, after the shattering experience of WW1 showed the 19th century assumption that events would work themselves out by laissez faire had failed. (Northcliffe may have had a parallel in the founders of Youtube—offering home videos of cats and babies, but then exposed to a disconcerting deluge of critiques and social comment). And Angell could be compared with Coudenhave-Kalergi, a propagandist, secretly paid by Jews, for a mestizo Europe. In a similar way, Angell, pretending to be a rational debater trying to avoid war, was a propagandist for Jewish aims. Angell is an interesting example, with such people as Henry George, Hobson, Kidd, Shaw, Belloc, Wells, Russell, H N Brailsford and sundry others, of the ego-centred journalist who never came to grips with critics. These people tended to borrow from each other both with and without acknowledgement; and they could make more money from books and pamphlets and fame than from getting together and hammering out details. At the time Angell wrote, there were no electronic media, so that books, the press, and the free press were the equivalent of preachers and political pamphleteers. And of course as Belloc pointed out, many points of view were censored by the usual processes.
Pacifism
BALFOUR ON GREAT BRITAIN AND ZIONISM
[ Top of page ] Speech at the Albert Hall at a Demonstration organised by the English Zionist Federation, to thank the British Government for a decision to incorporate the Balfour Declaration for a Jewish National Home in the Treaty of Peace with Turkey. July 12th, 1920. From Speeches and Addresses of the Earl of Balfour KG, OM, FRS 1910-1927 [Balfour speaks:] For long I have been a convinced Zionist, and it is in that character that I come before you to-day, though in my most sanguine moments I never foresaw, never even conceived, the possibility that the great work of Palestinian reconstruction would happen so soon, or that indeed it was likely to happen in my own lifetime. This is one of the great and unexpected results of the world struggle which has just come to an end—even if, indeed, we dare to say that it has yet completely come to an end. Of infinite evils that struggle has been the parent, but if among its results we can count the re-establishment in their ancient home of the Jewish people, at all events we can put to its credit one great result which under other circumstances, so far as we can see, could never have occurred at so early a date. Who would have thought five or six years ago that a speaker in the Albert Hall would be able to recount as an established fact that the Great Powers of the world had elected to accept the Declaration to which Lord Rothschild has referred, had consented to give a Mandate to the country which at all events is in the forefront among those who desire to see this policy brought to a successful issue, and that they would already have seen appointed as the High Commissioner of Palestine a man who so admirably joins the double qualifications which Lord Rothschild has so felicitously expressed? ...
J A HOBSON Despite huge output remained isolated
[ Top of page ] John Atkinson Hobson (1858-1940) was I think English. He lived through the South African wars, the 'Great War', and the 'Great Depression'. He is said to have opposed Jews, but was not very effectual. He has a place here because Lenin supposedly made use of Hobson's Imperialism, but of course was a Jew. I suspect Hobson was kept out of academic life; he seems weak on the East India Company, and his detailed research suggests he didn't have much access to papers, and judging by his output, he relied on his books to maintain his income, and perhaps because of that did little to write crisply and concisely. One of the ways Jews infiltrated ideas was by multiplying slogans, phrases, ideas which handily implied misleading concepts, and all the rest of it. But Hobson seemed to lack that facility. He wrote on underconsumption, which surely is simply a result of technological increases in some types of productivity. Production of weapons such as revolvers and field guns resulted from productivity increases. But I don't think he worked out alternatives, any more than people supporting Luddites were able to work out some way to spread out the gains from fabric technologies. Or medical people can find an alternative to the absurd COVID-19 hoax largely caused by the conquest of medical problems. Hobson, because of his attempts to work social theories into economics, was often actually called a 'Marxist'. Some of his books are included in marxists.org and Alvin Saunders Johnson of the New School of Social Research reviewed Hobson—and also got Jews from Germany into the USA. These days, thanks to the work of Miles Mathis, people are seeing through Jewish deception, but it has taken more than a century. Of course Jews noticed him; it's amusing to see the dishonest stuff about him in Wikipedia etc. Hobson doesn't seem to have identified the problems with the Federal 'Reserve'. And his books on the Great War and subsequent events seem feeble. I'm all but certain he would not have identified either World War as arranged by Jews and others. He even regarded himself as a follower of Keynes. Perhaps he was lucky to die before the Second World War was under way. As a writer, I fear I found him endlessly verbose, maybe following the rules for good English which he may have had forced into him. There is probably some valuable material in Hobson, but I fear it will not be easy to find. Rae West 2 Feb 2021
H G WELLS ON WAR AIMS DURING THE GREAT WAR
[ Top of page ] Taken from THE OUTLOOK FOR HOMO SAPIENS; Readers Union copy 1942. H G Wells's own account of the First World War, and his attempt to get a statement of war aims. Of course, from a modern perspective, support of Jewish aims and money-making for Jews, and this sort of thing made up the true war aims, would not be acceptable. Wells, naïvely unaware of secret Jewish pressure, must have been treated as a propagandist, all the more useful because he had no idea of hidden forces. Hence the varying and obviously insincere claims made after th war. '... As the first world war unfolded my mind was increasingly obsessed by the problem of how the war would end and what would come after the war. Imaginative people were guessing and inferring and making plans. The word "plan" became more and more frequent; at length no newspaper was complete without it. A Ministry of Foresight was suggested. We busied ourselves in making the New Map of Europe, the New Map of the World. The idea of a "League of Nations" emerged amidst this ferment of anticipatory projects. An interesting phase in all this forward-looking peering was the War Aims controversy. I happened to be working in Northcliffe's Ministry of Propaganda in Enemy Countries [See 'See Secrets of Crewe House' by Sir Campbell Stuart.] I was in particular directing the propaganda in Germany, and, in co-operation with Dr. J. W. Headlam-Morley, I induced our Crewe House colleagues to draw up a memorandum upon the allied war aims and submit it to the Foreign Office for endorsement. "This", we said, "is what we suppose we are fighting for, and if we can get this we shall be satisfied and the war will be at an end. Is that so? We cannot go on with our work properly unless we know its objective." The War Office was profoundly shocked. Whatever else in the world had been affected by the rotation of the human mind towards the future, the Foreign Office has remained immune. There, at any rate, war was what it always had been. You fought your way to your enemy's capital and you then "dictated terms". The objective of a war was victory. To reveal your terms beforehand was not done. So the Foreign Office never committed itself to a binding endorsement of our War Aims Memorandum, and it never warned us of various secret understandings that affected it. It remained in the self-satisfying pose of a superior body tolerating us and using us according to the best diplomatic traditions. And at length at Versailles the terms were dictated...' Page 99 of Angell has a footnote: ... from the five-volume History of the Peace Conference of Paris, Institute of International Affairs: "The war was a conflict between the principles of freedom and of autocracy, between the principles of moral influence and of material force, of government by consent and government by compulsion" It's amusing they couldn't bring themselves to mention 'democracy' as an aim amid their nonsense. 864 pages. [ Top of page ] G D H Cole (George Douglas Howard Cole 1889-1959) is described as: Reader in Economics in the University of Oxford. Member of the 'Economic Advisory Council'. Jews love to use the cover of collaborators; and their institutions sound official. And Margaret I. [Isabel] Cole, née Postgate. Wikipedia lists Cole as having written about 50 books; and Cole and his wife about 35 detective stories! There's an odd gap after The Life of William Cobbett (1925) to Some Essentials of Socialist Propaganda (1932). Wikipedia says: 'Cole wrote at least seven books for the Left Book Club, all of which were published by Victor Gollancz Ltd.' Wiki says both Hugh Gaitskell and Harold Wilson were influenced by Cole. Cole is described as the son of a 'jeweller'. His mother was 'Jessie Knowles'; Knowles describes a collection of jewish biographies. There are tantalising possibilities here; Cole sounds like a crypto-Jew, perhaps using a fake name, influenced by Sidney Webb, manoeuvring to the second world war, almost impossibly productive of books, and mysteriously active from 1925-1932, perhaps (my guess) as a ghost writer. Wikipedia says: In 1925, he became reader in economics at University College, Oxford. Maybe he was working. Or perhaps 'reading'. From 1932-1935 he wrote about 5 books, including this one; based on (judging from the bibliography) the Encyclopædia Britannica (14th edition 1929-1933, earlier editions from 1910-11), the Cambridge Modern History, the Statesman's Year Book for each country and year, and the Statistical Year Book of the UN. And many surveys and documents—mostly I think written by Jews. Cole seems to have dipped into many reference books, probably quoting them—these books having a similar influence to Internet after about the year 2000. Certainly there's a feeling that money and trade are the only things of any importance. And of course Jews are absurdly underestimated.
As with most writers of the time, the word 'Capitalism' is bandied about, and 'capitalist powers', 'hard currency' and similar undefined things, I suppose because everyone has experience of money, and often of banks, though of course few people have experience with mints and paper currencies and long-term loan arrangements. It's simply assumed people understand what money is. And there were powerful taboos against enquiring into it—H G Wells on 'currency cranks' illustrates this. Wells' Outline of History is referred to in the Coles' bibliographies. And of course Wells' novels, although including politicians and political climbers, have nothing on the heights of money. Similarly with debt: Cole nowhere says that debts should be repudiated to lenders who funded enemies.
Dame Margaret Cole: The Life of G D H Cole (published 1971, by MacMillan St Martin's Press) look at her qualifications and consider what knowledge she really had of then-modern science and industry, and then-modern finance, and then-modern law. And war.
I was moved to buy this biography (via Amazon, I fear) on Cole. I'd love to say it's a moving and profound book, but it isn't. The Coles (G D H 1889-1959, M I 1893-1980) were part of the Hampstead 'intellectual' left-wing types, who "never did a day's work in their lives"—I've heard that said of Bertrand Russell. Their dates were just right to plunge them into the Great War, but without any critical understanding. Dame Margaret—how these people love their time-worn titles—claims Cole loved William Morris, and was influenced towards socialism by Morris. This seems to mean 'Guild Socialism', trying to unify groups of workers in a guild system, naturally of no interest whatever to moneyed Jews.
Hampstead was an ideal location: high, the elevation being a discouragement to jerry builders, as horses found it difficult. But it had an underground station (1907) on the northern line, and ruralish surroundings: the Vale of Health was renamed from Hatchett's Bottom in 18-something. The Heath was and still is huge. Hampstead Garden Suburb (from 1907?) owed its existence to the Garden City movement. The Hammonds (John and Barbara Hammond, 1872-1949 and 1873-1961) on labourers were an earlier version. Henry Mayhew (1812–1887) was an earlier example, probably more genuine, original and less study-bound.
Here's Dame Margaret (pp 195-6): 'The work of the N.F.R.B. [some 'Bureau'] committee ... all undertaken with the long-term purpose of influencing public opinion ... in the direction of finding radical solutions to the problems of the troubled world, did not bear effective fruit until after the coming war [WW2] ... [Cole's first work was] the writing of large books of popular information.
Somewhere is a passage on an (((American))) trust or charity or academic philanthropic outfit offering six hundred pounds per book for some series. Dame Margaret does not reflect that the same outfit no doubt offered much the same to obscure authors in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Poland, Lithuania etc. She reminds me of Freemasons—not the 33rd level, which for example Buzz Aldrin and other US frauds belonged in, but the inferior ranks, enlivened by the thought of money and some contacts, but completely innocent of suspicions as to Freemasonic ultimate purposes.
The book is of interest only for its presentations of Jewish encroachments into Britain. The New Statesman, Harold Laski, Lord Nathan of Churt, Crypto-Jews, undeclared Jews, probable Jews, Reformed Jews, Jews from Germany, Jews from Poland, Jews from Russia, Jews from Hispanic parts, Crypto-Jew journalists, crypto-Jew academics, teachers, journalists.
As with religious believers in fairly established times, it's impossible to be sure that beliefs in outlying areas aren't simply adopted because they paid. It's likely enough. © RW 16 May 2020
[ Top of page ] UNWIN including ALLEN AND UNWIN
[ Top of page ] WATTS'S THINKER'S LIBRARY (1929-1951) —part of the Rationalist Press
[ Top of page ]
NOTES ON PENGUIN SPECIALS
[ Top of page ] PENGUIN SPECIALS at the end of 1938. Picture (left) shows the back cover of Angell's THE GREAT ILLUSION - NOW, itself a Penguin Special. All these books were published by Penguin. Note that one book in the series—on Palestine—was cancelled. It's easy to guess reasons for this. Here's a rough guide to these eight titles. • One Man Against Europe .. Konrad Heiden [Heiden is described on Wiki as 'an influential Jewish journalist and historian of the Weimar Republic and Nazi eras'. The title is obviously intended to suggested Hitler was alone, and to deny his immense popularity. My notes on his 1944 book on Hitler's Rise to Power was of course designed to hide Jewish activities: 'Jew Bolsheviks', Bela Kun of Hungary as a Jew, emigration e.g. to the USA, Nazi policies aren't indexed and are oddly underplayed. There is the traditional reticence about money (and also about Jewish censuses, though the author isn't averse to massive use of statistics in other contexts - see 513ff. Japan gets a few mentions with nothing that I could see on trade restrictions as a cause of war. It's unlikely Heiden was anything more than a hack, in the same tradition as Martin Gilbert.] • Britain's Health .. P E P REPORT ['Political and Economic Planning'. I haven't made much attempt to check on this pre-WW2 QUANGO. The obvious interpretation is that it's a Jewish-funded outfit to be used in Jewish control of Britain and its resources. Obviously it would have had to have been written to offer inducements for when the coming war is over.] • Germany - What Next? Edited by Richard Keane [Being an examination of the German menace in so far as it affects Great Britain. Authors: L. S. Amery, Sidney Barton, Victor Gordon Lennox, Sheila Grant Duff, Richard Keane, Bernard Keeling, General Tilho. No problem identifying the motivation here. And no problem identifying why Hitler's peace offers were unmentioned. Leo Amery was literally a crypto-Jew: he kept it secret, including his involvement with Balfour. Most of the others were Jews or Jew-connected.] • Our Food Problem - F. Le Gros Clark & Richard M. Titmuss [Foot shortage may have been another red-herring meme. Jews wanted control of food, by way of control of money. Here's Jensen on the 'World Food Shortage' .] • The New German Empire .. F. Borkenau ['Borkenau was born in Vienna, Austria, the son of a civil servant. As a university student in Leipzig, his main interests were Marxism and psychoanalysis' is a typical description. In fact he attended the Frankfurt School. He wrote 'The Communist International' (1938), 'a history which is also an analysis'. Obviously such a creature would never write an honest appraisal of Germany.] • Microbes by the Million .. Hugh Nicol [Hugh Nicol '... outlines a new philosophy of science ..' I'd guess the point here is to have expensive research institutes. Certainly this worked with Jews and the huge fraud of nuclear weapons, but the principle would be control. Biological warfare would be part of the work.] • Poland .. W. J. Rose [This seems to be William John Rose. I haven't seen this book (emails are welcome) but probably the author was yet another Jew. The book might cast light on official policy to Poland: Jews presumably wanted it to attack Germany, and hence Jews in Poland provoking Germany. And they would want bogus assurances from the British government. I'd guess this book was never reprinted, or heavily edited, after Stalin's Jewish controllers invaded Poland.] • The Attack from Within .. F. Elwyn Jones [Frederick Elwyn Jones, who at the time was a 30-year old barrister 'with experience of living in Germany', writes of 'German expansion and preparations for world domination, and the need for this expansion and the evils of Nazism to be stopped'. The last authorities he gives for the evidence he submits (he used Hansard, The Daily Telegraph and The Manchester Guardian a lot) are dated late May 1939. Just another rented prostitute, indifferent to millions of deaths.] The right-hand picture is taken from an Internet list of all the many Penguin Special titles. Note the publication date is given, down to the day. And the printers are quoted: presumably they had no option but to print propaganda, or Jewish clients would in future be closed to them. It's worth quoting a bit from H G Wells , on the Penguin Special 'The Jewish Problem' by Louis Golding which ignores completely 'the effect of this Chosen People cult upon the outside world'. [ Top of page ]
[ Top of page ]
Victor Gollancz and earlier members of Gollancz familiesRW 20 May 2020. I've put here three descriptions from reference-books of Victor Gollancz, Hermann Gollancz (1852-1930) and Israel Gollancz (1864-1930). These two latter were largely at London University, which appears to have been established as a more-or-less Jewish educational establishment as opposing where necessary the supposedly Reformation Christianity of Oxbridge.Hermann Gollancz is described as an 'authority on Hebrew language and literature'; readers might guess at how much he was concerned to publicise the Talmud. Israel Gollancz was supposed to be 'an authority on early English texts'. Revisionist students might investigate the extent to which 'British' deeds, for example in India, China, and South Africa, were obscured by Jews.
Here's some commentary by Hilaire Belloc, more or less contemporary, who wrote on the Jews before the 'Great War' and the Federal Reserve, and after—The Jews was published first in 1922, a few years after the end of that war. Here are a few extracts:
... treating of the Jew ... [as] a plain citizen like the rest, worked well enough for a time. One might almost say that there was no Jewish problem consciously present to the mind of the average educated Englishman or Frenchman, Italian, or even western German, between, say, the years 1830 and 1890. A very small body of Jews ... were vaguely associated with wealth ...; a large proportion of them were distinguished for public work ... The presence of such men could not conceivably lead to political difficulties—or at least, so it then seemed.
It might have continued to flourish for yet another generation ... but for two new developments ... The first was the growth of numbers, the second of influence. ... the enormous increase throughout all the West of the Jewish poor, accompanied by the enormous increase of the power exercised by the Jewish rich in public affairs. ... their presence was everywhere unavoidable, in the streets, and in the offices of government. The fiction ... became impossible in the face of the vast new ghettoes of London, Manchester, Bradford, Glasgow, [and Leeds] and the formidable and growing list of Jewish and half-Jewish Ministers, Viceroys, ambassadors, dictators of policy. Belloc did not understand propaganda. He wrote: ‘the press of our great cities is controlled by very few men, whose object is ... the piling up of private fortune.’ In fact, the new industrialised press made it possible for Jews to secretly propagandise on huge issues: in particular for wars against people they thought of as enemies: these included all non-Jewish Europeans and Americans. Belloc appreciated the vulgarity of newspapers, but understated the extent of academic corruption (and bureaucratic and legal corruption, which he barely mentions). Here he is on historians (with whom he must have had a lot of experience; his degree was in history, which he did when relatively mature): The same man who shall have written a monograph upon some point of nineteenth century history and left his readers in ignorance of the Jewish elements in the story will regale you in private with a dozen anecdotes: such-and-such a man was a Jew; such-and-such a man was half a Jew; another was controlled in his policy by a Jewish mistress; the go-between in such-and-such a negotiation was a Jew; the Jewish blood in such-and-such a family came in thus and thus—And so forth: but not a word of it on the printed page!
And Belloc did not realise the extent of Jewish power; he knew about raw materials and mining, but not financing large-scale weaponry and materiel. ... hundreds of educated men taken into the temporary Civil service during the late war ... found, holding the locked gate of one monopoly after another, the international Jew. ... everybody has discovered ... what is ... a source of exasperation—the solidarity of the Jewish race where the interests of any member of it were concerned.
Belloc never understood the Jewish genesis of Catholicism. He accepted the mythology of belief systems as he cause of religions; he had little feeling for violence and property as the true motives. And Belloc didn't realise the importance for Jews of destroying historical evidence; Belloc thought it was natural that European man should have little connection with his past, and Belloc didn't see that this was partly accomplished by getting rid of evidences, such as writings, laws, chronologies, historical accounts, evidence of money. This attitude is part of the true tradition of Catholicism. Here's Belloc, assuming men are too limited to think in long-terms ways: ... we are asked to believe that this political upheaval was part of one highly-organized plot centuries old, the agents of which were millions of human beings all pledged to the destruction of our society and acting in complete discipline under a few leaders superhumanly wise! The thing is nonsense on the face of it. Men have no capacity for acting in this fashion. They are far too limited, far too diverse. ... the conception of a vast age-long plot ... will not hold water, any more than will the corresponding hallucination which led men to believe that the French revolution (a thing utterly different in kind from the Russian) was the mere outward expression of a strictly disciplined secret body. In the case of the French Revolution everything was put down [according to Belloc!] ... to the secret agency of The Order of Templars acting unweariedly through six centuries, and finally bringing down the French monarchy. In the case, of course, of the Bolshevist anarchy a still longer range is given to the final result: for "Templars" read "Jews," and for "600" read "2,000" years. It is all smoke.
C N PARKINSON ON THE LEFT BOOK CLUB
[ Top of page ] [Here's more by Parkinson; well-written, but Jew blind: Parkinson on Marx, and on the Webbs] Appendix from Left Luggage (1967). Pagination from the paperback edition. C N Parkinson, famous for Parkinson's Law, wrote 'Left Luggage' as a rather unfocused anti-'left' analysis and protest. As anyone can see from the following appendix, Parkinson had no real idea of the part played by Jews in Britain's history and downfall. He had no idea of the start of the Second World War. For example, he describes Victor Gollancz as a 'humanitarian Jew'–something like the opposite of the truth. Parkinson had little idea about the subversion of socialism by Jews—though his book includes quite acute material on Beatrice and Sidney 'Webb'. He had no idea about Jewish control of money, and with infinite naivete assumes that Gollancz's books were subject to the normal problems of costs that apply to non-Jewish businesses. No doubt Gollancz was subsidised; and no doubt when their usefulness was over, after 1947, 'Left Books' were discreetly dropped. The intellectual life of the British Labour Party is fairly represented by the story of the Left Book Club. This was founded by Victor Gollancz in 1936 and reached its maximum membership of 60,000 in the following year. Some sixteen hundred discussion groups were organized and there was even a rally in the Albert Hall. Victor Gollancz (1893-1967) was a humanitarian Jew of great energy who had been managing director of Benn's, the publishing house which pioneered the sixpenny paperback. He founded his own firm in 1928 and had an immediate success with Journey's End by R. C. Sherriff. [Note: this was a lachrymose and sentimental look at deaths in the First World War trenches; a similar book was Neville Shute's On the Beach dealing with a hypothetical 'nuclear war'.] His aim in founding the Left Book Club was to make a synthesis of socialist ideas, create a Popular Front and 'stop Hitler without war'. Books published for the Club numbered about 247 in all, the first, Out of the Night, appearing in 1936 and the last in 1948. The volumes were accompanied and explained in a monthly periodical called Left News which flourished over the same period. Authors who contributed to the series included Sir Richard Acland, Clement Attlee, Emile Burns, A. Fenner Brockway, G. D. H. and M. I. Cole, Sir Stafford Cripps, Victor Gollancz himself, J. B. S. Haldane, Harold Laski, Philip Noel-Baker, George Orwell, R. Palme Dutt, Stephen Spender, S. Swingler and R. H. Tawney. The books published were mainly concerned with immediate events and have had little circulation in later years. George Orwell's book, The Road to Wigan Pier (1937), is perhaps the only Left Book Club work to be classed as a work of literature. The most prolific author in this series was John Strachey, with seven titles, next to him G. D. H. Cole with six and Victor Gollancz himself with four. Faithfully reflecting the mood of the period, the Left Book {185} Club publications are weakest in political theory. Readers were assumed (no doubt rightly) to be members of the Labour Party, loyal to the Webbs and needing no argument to sustain their faith. Socialist theory was thus represented by An Outline of Political Thought (1939) by S. Swingler, The Acquisitive Society (1937) by R. H. Tawney, and three works by John Strachey, Theory and Practice of Socialism (1936), Federalism or Socialism? (1940) and Programme for Progress (1940). After F. Allen had asked Can Capitalism Last? (1938) and after Stephen Spender had sounded the call Forward from Liberalism (1937), the socialist message came to an end. That, however, was where the Marxists began, for six of the publications deal with Marxism; one by Emile Burns, one by G. D. H. Cole and a third comparing Marx with Freud. Fourteen volumes in the series deal with Soviet Russia and another six with China, these last including Red Star over China (1937) by Edgar Snow and The Chinese Communists (1946) by Stuart Golder. One way and another, the Communist point of view is fully represented, finding some further expression in another seven books about the Spanish Civil War. But the Popular Front was to include the workers as well as the Communists. There are thus several books about Trade Unionism and one on the Co-operative Movement. More emphasis is given, however, to particular grievances, as Six Men of Dorset (1937) or to studies in the problems of unemployment. Most significant of these was Ellen Wilkinson's book about Jarrow, The Town That Was Murdered (1939). [Note added later: the 'Jarrow March' was a typical bit of Jew propaganda. In fact, there was little interest within Jarrow, and few people participated, I'm informed by inhabitants of the town, which was conveniently remote from London.] More telling still, however, were some of the attacks on Conservatism such as that implied in Tory M.P. (1939) by Simon Haxey. For the workers, again, there were included about twenty merely educational books, their subject matter ranging from eugenics to birth control, from chemistry to economic botany. For relaxation, finally, there were Poems of Freedom (1938) and the Left Song Book (1938). Less fortunate was the campaign to 'stop Hitler without war'. Books on foreign countries and foreign policy form, it is true, the most numerous section in the list. Countries {186} discussed include Austria, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Greece, Eire and Poland. The country least mentioned is the U.S.A. Books denouncing the Nazi and Fascist movements number about twenty and include such titles as Hitler the Pawn (1936) by Rudolf Olden and Under the Axe of Fascism (1936) by Gaetano Salvemini. Denunciations came most loudly, however, from avowed pacifists whom any dictator could safely ignore. Book titles range from Battle for Peace (1938) by F. Elwyn Jones to Struggle for Peace (1936) by Sir Stafford Cripps. Victor Gollancz himself asked Is Mr Chamberlain Saving the Peace? (1939) and Leonard Woolf complained of Barbarians at the Gate (1939). The note of pessimism in Why Capitalism Means War (1938) by H. N. Brailsford was answered confidently by Eleanor Rathbone whose conclusion was that War Can Be Averted (1938). All this drivel was definitely harmful to British interests as well as to the cause (for what it was worth) of peace. An odd sequel was the Left Book Club contribution to civil defence; A.R.P. (1938) by J. B. S. Haldane, Protection of the Public from Aerial Attack (1937) by a group of Cambridge scientists, and How to be Safe from Air Raids (1938) by J. B. S. Haldane again. These publications reveal the general attitude of the Left towards international affairs. First, the country should disarm in the cause of peace, reducing the armed forces to a minimum and undermining the morale of the troops by assuring them that wars are caused by capitalists and arms manufacturers. Second, we should proclaim our undying opposition to the Nazi and Fascist movements in Germany and Italy. Third, we should interfere in the Spanish Civil War, supporting the 'government' against 'the rebels'. Fourth, we should strive above all For Peace and Friendship (1937) and, fifth, we should concentrate our main effort not on winning the coming war but on saving the civilian population from air attack. This was the road to Munich, if not to Wigan Pier. Towards the Commonwealth the attitude of the Left was indicated, first of all, by Alexander Campbell's book, It's Your Empire (1945). A certain responsibility was thus {187} assumed but the books on this topic reveal a lack of interest. Empire or Democracy by L. Barnes (1939) defines an alternative and Subject India (1943) by H. N. Brailsford suggests an attitude. Two other books about India with Left Turn Canada (1946) by M. J. Coldwell, and When Smuts Goes (1948) by Arthur Keppel-Jones, go to complete the Left Book Club's survey of the Dominions. The colonies are dealt with in one general work, Colour, Race and Empire (1944) by A. G. Russell and two books about Africa; one of them, by John Burgen, entitled Black Man's Burden (1943). Little interest was shown in Australia or New Zealand, in Malaya or the West Indies, and practically none in the Middle East except as illustrating the Jewish Question. Left Book Club publications were priced at 2s. 6d. each, implying a fairly large circulation. Membership remained sufficient, however, during World War II and up to the time of the General Election of 1945. With Labour in power, membership dwindled rapidly and stood at just over 3,000 when the Club's activities were brought to an end in 1948. The last volumes incurred a considerable loss and Victor Gollancz went on to campaign in other directions. What is particularly interesting about this story is the fact that the Left Book Club provided only the literature of criticism and revolt. The basic ideas dated from before World War I and each current problem was seen in the light of an accepted creed. Books in this series had a limited range of mythology and grievance, exhortation and attack. Without a Conservative government, the whole movement died away. It might, of course, be argued that the Club, by 1945, had served its purpose. This was true in a negative sense but the formation of a Labour government should in theory have led to an outburst of creative thinking. Labour's Plan for Plenty by Michael Young came in 1947 and the electoral triumph of 1945 should have heralded a spate of even more constructive proposals. The energies which had been absorbed in warfare were free now to build Jerusalem in Britain's green and pleasant land. Intellectually, however, the Labour Party had long since shot its bolt. [Note by rerevisionist: In fact, the Jews who funded the Labour Party had no interest in the white British. No 'constructive proposals' or 'creative thinking' for them!] The Left Book Club series tailed {188} away with duller books and fewer readers. Even a further and prolonged period in opposition failed to revive the Club, which is now no more than a memory. If Out of the Night (1936) by H. J. Muller marked the beginning of this series, we can see an equal significance in the titles with which it came to an end, namely Prisoners of Fear (May 1948), How Long the Night (August 1948) and, last of all, The Meaning of Marxism (November 1948). [ Top of page ]
Another Gollancz book in my possession is Harold J. Laski's Faith, Reason and Civilisation - An Essay in Historical Analysis (1944, with a preface written in 1943 from a small English village, Little Bardfield). It is a typically dull book. A small point of interest is a mention of J M Robertson's History of Free Thought and Christianity as 'binding' men. Another small point is that he discussed matters with 'Mr and Mrs Sidney Webb', though Beatrice Webb was dead by the time this book was published, and Sidney Webb (or whatever his real name was) had been made 'Lord Passfield' more or less fifteen years earlier. The book leaves a strange impression: Laski has the Jewish outlook that Jews alone matter; and his book omits any possibility that the war then raging could be anything other than necessary and anything other than a struggle of immense heroism against huge odds. It is psychopathological. Its strength is that to uninformed people—and wartime censorship ensured that was very many people indeed—it sounds utterly convincing. There is no instinctive evolved defence against lies of this sort in any artificial medium; defence has to be learned. It is entirely possible that Jewish evolution over time has bred a collective tribe of pathological actors. I'll quote a few passages browsed from the book:
The 'Right Book Club': Faked and Controlled Jewish Opposition [ Top of page ] The Right Book Club. Above is a flyer probably from 1938: One of the books listed is Propaganda Boom allegedly by an A.J.Mackenzie, published in 1938. That book's blurb starts This book approaches problems of national and world politics from a new angle. It shows how human emotions are controlled and exploited by propaganda; how bloodless victories are won by the use of the psychological weapon which has become an invaluable ally of Statecraft. ... He discusses the great advance in the technique of propaganda since the Dictator States (especially Germany) began to build upon the foundations laid by Britain in the Great War; ... In fact, the book has nothing on new special techniques. It conflates Germany, Italy, the USSR and to a lesser extent Japan; there's no mention of Roosevelt, Churchill, Jewish finance, Jews in the USSR, or any of the other sinister gathering forces. The 'Right Book Club' (Over '25,000 Members') advertised: Members Buy Books Published at 7/6, 8/6, 10/6, 12/6 & 15/- for 2/6 each The series is clearly controlled opposition—none of the titles presents any serious consideration of world politics, militarism, Jewish policy. It is quite sickeningly dishonest, published purely to help warmongers insofar as they bothered with Britain. But the name suggests the club was invented to occupy an obvious publication gap with books mimicking serious comment. Judging by their flyer, these books were unsaleable at normal prices: Members Buy Books Published at 7/6, 8/6, 10/6, 12/6 & 15/- for 2/6 each. These prices are in shillings and pence, of which there were 12 to the shilling: 7/6d is three times 2/6d, for example. The titles are a sad mixture, probably aimed at middle class useful idiots: Queen Victoria, England's countryside, lightweight looks at Britain; plus titles on the Spanish Civil War and USSR Communism, with of course no mention of Jews; muted material on the British Empire, destined to go; and so on. These are worth studying as examples of what is meant by 'controlled opposition', in which Jews control a dialogue: not 'both sides', since the important material is entirely censored out; but what are presented as two sides—Hitler and Mussolini are 'these dictators', omitting Stalin; nothing about capitalism vs finance; nothing important about aristocracies. But 'Liberal' vs 'Conservative', 'Labour vs Conservative', or as here 'Right' vs 'Left', are givens. The only book which established a name was "Assignment in Utopia" by Eugene Lyons, A devastating criticism of the Soviet regime, not exactly first with the news, and which of course has nothing on the reality of Jewish control, and Jewish finance, notably from Jews in the USA and Germany. There's an enormous list of Patrons, Right Honorables, Sirs, Barristers, Rear-Admirals, Vice-Air Marshals, KGs, KCs, DSOs, MPs —probably to give an air of upper-class respectability, though I'd guess also suggesting the types who lent their names for a fee to shady company promoters. I notice the name of L S Amery, the very-crypto-Jew who wanted war. The five names on the selection committee are: Lt Col Norman G Thwaites, Capt Anthony Ludovici, Trevor Blakemore, Derek Walker-Smith, and Collinson Owen. A terrifying sad commentary on the intellect of Britain in the late 1930s. Wikipedia states: A "Right Book Club" was launched as a conservative response to the LBC in 1937 by Edgar Samuel, who worked for the bookselling firm Foyle's. Probably it was way for Foyle's to dump unsold books and their back catalogue; no doubt Edgar Samuel wrote a misleading circular, and collected public names to attach to his list. I wonder if they were annoyed.
[ Top of page ]
DIRECTORATE OF ARMY EDUCATION: BRITISH WAY AND PURPOSE [1942-1944]
[ Top of page ] A series of 18 booklets produced as part of a three-hours-per-week education scheme, which unexpectedly seemed to expand. These were bound together in a red hardback. Most of the authors, or 'instructors' as they seem to be called, are identified. A fascinating compound of the desire to educate with propaganda of pretty much Tory type and uneasy forward look at 'reconstruction'; government white papers of 1944 and a few other reports are summarised over twenty pages or so. Also international treaties etc from 1941-1944 are summarised. 'Labour Party' is not in the index; looking back of course few people predicted the 1945 victory, and it seems fair to regard this as army propaganda. There's some interesting stuff comparing empires (absurdly, the British is here represented as tiny; in accordance presumably with the idea of telling them what they want to hear - there is no class in Britain, education is of the top quality, etc) and on supporting British economic interests in foreign countries (not worded like that) and Christianity and so on. Here's a contents list. Note the complete absence of anything serious on Jewish influences, for which these simpletons prepared to kill. The dates suggest this may have been aimed at least partly at Americans in Britain. BWP1 CITIZEN OF BRITAIN | BWP2 BRITAIN IN ACTION [Not original?] | BWP3 CITIZEN OF EMPIRE | BWP4 CITIZEN OF THE WORLD | BWP5 REVIEW | BWP6 THE SETTING | BWP7 THE RESPONSIBLE CITIZEN [Not original?] | BWP8 THE CITIZEN AT WORK | BWP9 THE HOME OF THE CITIZEN | BWP10 THE HEALTH OF THE CITIZEN | BWP11 EDUCATION AND THE CITIZEN | BWP12 WHAT MORE IS NEEDED OF THE CITIZEN? [Not original?] | BWP13 THE FAMILY AND NEIGHBOURHOOD | BWP14 PEOPLE AT WORK | BWP15 BRITAIN IN EUROPE | BWP16 YOU AND THE EMPIRE | BWP17 YOU AND THE COLONIES | BWP18 BRITAIN AND THE PEACE More on this in How the Master Race Won World War 2
Three examples originally published by Macmillan in 1950, 1952, and 1953.
Nikolaus Pevsner. New Domesday Book of England
Nicolaus Pevsner 1902-1983Attributed to Pevsner is a 46-volume series of county-by-county guides, The Buildings of England (1951–74).Pevsner was of course a Jew, and his works in this series (one every six months) were first 'published by Penguin Books between 1951 and 1974' according to their Manchester volume of about 2000, then published by Yale University Press. Which credits six funding sources, including Sainsbury family charitable truss, the lottery, English Heritage and more.This seems to be part of the Jewish victory of the Second World War, securing through the '50s and '60s intellectual guard over English buildings and the 'built environment' generally. The series is mentioned in 1960 in one of E J Hobsbawm's Jewish history. The RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architecture) awarded him a gold medal, I think in 1967. Nobody seems to have mentioned that English architects could easily have produced such works. The collection is something like a Domesday Book after 1950. What seems to have happened is that (according to Wikipedia) two other Jews joined him in 'research'. I don't know their names. All cities, towns, and even quite small places had public libraries with their local archives, which would of course include documents on important buildings, sometimes including very detailed material on buildings, architectural plans, costs, craftsmen, and so on. It all seems innocent enough—collaborators investigating buildings, beauty, and truth. The problem is that Jews re-inserted themselves into England after the English 'civil war' and took direct control of the City of London money system. The expenses of war plus the substitution of the Bank of England impoverished the English generally, and what followed involved in the 18th century/1700s redistribution of property with a building boom for the newly-enriched Jews and allies. How this was done—taking of English assets and the rest of it—was not to be investigated. It wasn't just Germany that had its records and legal decisions and patents and gold reserves rifled!
And this process unfortunately continues at the present day. The National Trust and English Heritage give minimum information on their properties. One guesses for example that the 18th century building boom was over-extended, leaving the new owners with impressive but unmanageable piles.
After the war, the money-makers came out to play, while the Jews consolidated their gains in Europe, with looting, sex, and violence. Victor Gollancz' 1951 spy book is part of a whole set of thriller genres, including detective stories, Ian Fleming's James Bond—though the Jewish Broccoli crop was unlike the original—and John le Carre , endless 'intelligence' and spy junk, manufactured stories about 'Nazis', and the so-called 'Cold War'. The Jewish essential is that Jews in the U.S.S.R., U.S.A., and Europe should not be identified as a unit under any circumstances. In Chief of Intelligence Canaris must not be shown as part of a Jewish network, arranging among themselves the course of WW2. Whether it was in fact true is an irrelevance. Nor should war crimes, past and future, of their host countries, of which of course there were vast numbers. Nor should Jewish control of money, particularly over bankrupted Britain, France and Germany ever be mentioned. Much later, Spycatcher still followed this line, though there are flickerings of awareness. The nuclear issue was another Jewish fraud, which I hope will slowly unfold, and which possibly directed more money to Jews than any other of their non-financial frauds.
The Communist Technique in Britain by Bob Darke.
[ Top of page ]
1952. 'Communism' is a code for Jews. This is a Penguin Special number S 160. 'Penguin Specials' were propagandist titles to draw attention to topics Jews were promoting at the time. Bob Darke [ Top of Page ]
Penguin Special (S160)—cover design right—was published in 1952, by which time Darke (I presume this is a false name, to conceal 'Jewishness'. Real name not known to me) had been a Borough Councillor in Hackney for 18 years, before his resignation from the CP in 1951. In other words, he was a Councillor since about 1933. He must have been part of the Jewish movement supposedly against Germany, but in fact wanting war between whites in Europe.
It's online as a pdf file, less than 1MB: Click here for Penguin Special S160. It's worth noting that there must have been collusion with the civil service, police, security 'services', MPs et al, just as now when these scum do nothing about white girls being raped, white boys being attacked, and so on.
1956. The New Outline of Modern Knowledge. Ed Alan Pryce-Jones; with about 26 authors.
[ Top of Page ]
A small part of the Jewish race triumphalism after their victory of the Second World War, and the enormous white death toll which they successfully executed. 'Modern' knowledge of course means the Jewish interpretation of world events, and the parts played by Jews in them. The title is a reference to H G Wells: he complained in his Experiment in Autobiography that his book The Outline of History had been so popular that outlines—of this and that—proliferated between the wars. The dust jacket's verso blurb states that Gollancz's 1931 Outline of Modern Knowledge was 'one of the two or three most remarkable successes in the whole of our pre-war publishing. First issued in 1931, it had sold close on 100,000 copies by 1913, when it went out of print.'
Victor Gollancz (hence the 'VG' logo): my 1956 copy of The New Outline of Modern Knowledge was updated, or changed, from An Outline of Modern Knowledge (1931; out of print by 1937, states the jacket). The older book, The Outline of Modern Knowledge, was edited by Dr William Rose, no doubt a Jew, and no doubt shows the propaganda thought suitable by Jews in the 1930s. The 'New Outline' had an entirely new team of contributors and editor. As would be expected, Jews wrote the material on which Jews depended; in fact it's probably true that the way to identify Jewish frauds is to look for Jewish control. Thus for example we have Harrod on economics, with his trip through Marshall of the 1870s and much of the British 'industrial Revolution', and Keynes' General Theory, which ignores control of finance. International Economics was written by Thomas Balogh, a Hungarian Jew, I'd guess (without checking) thrown out in the 1956 Hungarian Revolution. He is keen to say the USSR was a new style of economy—the truth, that it was funded externally by Jews, who wanted their money back, being less attractive. Balogh says in effect Germany 'spent its way out of depression', a Jewish phrase designed to omit facts about Jews and money. But of course, it's so easy—any poor country can simply 'spend its way out'. Balogh was part of the disaster of Harold Wilson's 'Labour' government later. Henry Seligman writes on 'Physics and the Atomic Age'; R C Zaehner writes on 'The Religious Instinct'; Herman Grisewood of the BBC writes on 'The New Arts of the 20th Century', rather than the more accurate 'State Propaganda'. While these can be confidently assigned to Jewish propagandists, we also find Christopher Hollis on 'International Organizations' with its suggestion of Establishment collusions and lies. The jacket of Gollancz's 1956 book, and the summary of the authors. The format is a 600 page hardback mini-encyclopaedia, probably aimed at young people in Britain as much as their elders. I can imagine many copies given as presents. From the propagandist viewpoint, anything remote is an easy target: Germany and Russia and China, for example. Anything puzzling makes potential propaganda: finance, religion, laws across the world, nuclear weapons and power, psychology, human races, for example. New things, such as internationalism and federations and international controls, are typical Jew interests. Some novelties were avoided: for example DNA and electron microscopy. I'll simply draw attention to some of the contributors:
1960s examples 'Historians' Indifferent to Truth
1990s Heinemann Hardback Library Series on Social Issues as Promoted by JewsRelic of 'Dutch William' and intrusion of Jews into England? I have an old copy of Philip Steele on Past and Present Riots. Published 1993 by 'Heinemann Library' of Heinemann Publishers, with an address in Oxford, England, presumably to sound academic. Branches listed in 17 towns, including Ibadan, Nairobi, and Harari.
15 Worthy Lane Winchester SO23 7AB. Propaganda and lies HQ The Jewish propaganda of this book is fixed by its date. The overview Jewish claim is at the end of the book: 'As long as starvation exists, people will riot. As long as people suffer unjust government, they will riot. As long as people are brought up in ignorance or prejudice, they may act as bullies towards other people and cultures. It is sometimes not enough for individuals to stand up alone for what is right. They must join together on an international basis and work for peace.' The Jewish claim is of course a fraud. Jews organise internationally, and what they mean is that collaborators can expect other Jews than local ones to act together, but 'working for peace' is unlikely to be the result! Whether people will riots, is far more uncertain than they claim: obviously, very often they didn't. And of course the idea that rioting will summon up food for starving people is suspect. And of course some 'cultures'—notably Jewish—are vicious and anti-human and deserve to be stood against.
Let's examine the interesting list of 'KEY DATES'. They are mostly in Britain; Jews work by partitioning the world by nations, languages, markets, or whatever. So similar books in French, Russian, German, South American, anywhere, will have different targets plus some identical targets.
For the Real Meaning of Usury (different page) check the idea that Jews and Roman Catholics collaborated, to keep money-making as a Jew monopoly. The frantic screeching against 'usury' seems to be just another piece of propaganda.
On the question of collaboration, if we look at large-scale violence and wars, I'd suggest there's a similar collaboration, certainly in modern times, with weapons made by heavy industry financed by very long-term loans and secret sales of assets.
Omitted material is so common that is must be viewed as the most common Jewish activity. In the past few centuries, the East India Companies of the Netherlands and England, Cromwell, the 'French' Revolution, the Opium Wars, wars in Africa, both World Wars and the invention of the USSR, are just a few ruthlessly censored topics.
More titles 'in the series' include in ISBN order: These are supposed to be '... Social issues of today set in the context of history'. Note that war, mass murder, starvation are not included. There's no hint that Israel is a rogue state. And nothing on media lies. I leave it to the reader to try to work out what events are being flagged, in addition to the events which are ignored. Out of curiosity, I looked up Philip Steele—easily done in the age of Internet. I think I counted 240 books, only, to be fair, about five a year, though who knows the final total or the accuracy of the attributions. Most of the titles above are attributed to Steele. So is The Holocaust: The Origins, Events, and Remarkable Tales of Survival, a biography of Newton, I wonder why pyramids were built ... presumably a hack writing to order. Less anonymous than the Jewish-owned press!
2000: David Irving vs Lipstadt & Penguin BooksI decided to make the upper limit 2000, increased from 1993, making the interval end roundly at the new century.David Irving sued Lipstadt (a hack writer) and Penguin for libel. A long trial, lasting 33 days. I was there much of the time; here's my detailed report on Irving vs Lipstadt & Penguin Books.
RW: Finished version first upload 2015-01-24 to 28. Right Book Club added 2017-07-11. Home link 04-Oct-2017. Wells link and James Parkes Penguin added 5 Oct 2017. Unwin and Watts added 6 July 2018. Bieligk added 24 July 2018. Parkinson on Marx and the Webbs added 24 August 2018. Penguin Special S160 added 2 March 2020. Cole on Europe etc 13 May 2020. Gollancz references 20 May 2020. This tidied version 15 June 2020. Heinemann Aug 13 2020. Addition of link sign for other pages, small corrections, and Allen Lane death Dec 23 2021. Addition of David Irving libel prosecution, and Nicolaus Pevsner on architecture, May 2023 Top of Page |