ON THE DISCOVERY OF THE 500-YEAR WAR OF JEWISH AGGRESSION

Martin Luther: On the Jews and their Lies

Political maps show territories; most people think of countries in the way shown in this black-and-white map of the world.
    I've tried to show the actual Jewish state, as an elongated shape straddling many countries, in about 1920, when Jews in the USA and the Fed acted with Germans to support Moscow in the USSR.
    New York, London, Paris, Berlin, Moscow are marked. Rome, Jerusalem, Johannesburg, Toronto, Thessaloniki and other areas might of course be marked, too.

• 'Mesira' or 'mesirah' - 'informing on Jews to non-Jews'. The penalty is a general Jihad-style death penalty. (Google Jewish child molesters, money launderers, tax evaders, and so on. Where death isn't practicable, this seems to be modified into shunning these people—the informers, not what others judge as criminals).
• 'Kol Nidre' - On the Day of Atonement, very first prayer, repeated three times, an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. Analogous idea to 'taqqiya' in Islam. [At the time of writing, 'Jews' David Cameron and Edward Miliband in Britain are making 'pledges' that the parties they front will carry out certain policies! ...]
• Jews who ignore other peoples' laws (on say immigration, deportation, prostitution, child sex, removal of body organs, fraud, passports, such things as BBC charter) seem at present to be widely tolerated. And so do Jews who are moved into positions they aren't competent to do. Whether this will continue remains to be seen.
• For example, just a few years ago even the liberal state of California passed a law prohibiting the "marriage" of sodomites. Similar enactments of the will of the majority of the American people were widespread across the nation. Then Talmudic tactics were employed by Federal judges. In Orthodox Judaism laws are not made by a legislature. In Judaism, the law is made by judicial decision. Rabbinic courts make the laws and it is by that law-making function of the US courts that the will of the majority of the American people has been overthrown. Through Talmudic-style jurisprudence, the chicken littles who have raised the alarm about Sharia law have seen their family values flushed by "gay" rights, law-making judges who have usurped the function of a people's legislature, in line with the Talmud.
• Jews 'should not be counted'.
• Jesus is or will be bound in hell and boiling in excrement or semen, apparently forever.
• There is serious hatred against Christianity. A probable example is the present Archbishop of Canterbury, of Jewish extraction from Germany, whose name at present is Welby, who made no traditional Christmas speech at the end of 2014. The devastating attacks on the Russian Orthodox Church under the 20th-century Jewish genocide illustrate the kind of thing, though of course details are censored by the Jewish media and Jewish-controlled academics and teachers.
• Genocide against non-Jews is a prominent feature of Judaism. Originally of course such discussions were of small groups, by today's standards. The word 'genocide' was coined by a Jew, probably as part of the fraud which was later called the 'Holocaust'. This is easily converted into systematic and secret anti-white activity.
• One thing that befuddles the mind is the fact that Jews warn the Gentiles what they will do before they do it. So if a Jew is going to create massive riots from hate-filled propaganda, they will have it written down somewhere first.

• Art: both have taboos against representative art, such as portraits
• Cruel ritual slaughter and food taboos including pigs
• Circumcision
• Calendar system influenced by the moon
• Distinctive odd clothing
• Very pronounced out-group feeling against goyim and kuffar: deliberate refusal to extend ethics to non-members (e.g. religious Jews and Muslims regard medical help to outgroup members as unnecessary. Charity only to group members. Out-group women and children regarded as prostitutes).
• Very pronounced in-group feeling with serious penalties, including death, for leaving. Women expected to tolerate inferiority.
• Legal system of a sort
• Slavery, very much emphasised in the Quran and in Jewish books. Both religions have had huge involvements - Jewish involvement in Africa has only recently been rediscovered
• Both ideologies are essentially parasitic: neither society produced much of any originality and both have a history of bringing ruination and damage.
and
• Genetics: the inbreeding systems cause genetic defects: so much so, diseases such as 'Tay-Sachs' were grouped by late 19th century medical doctors as 'Jewish Diseases'. Less well-known—because of media censorship—is that some Muslim inbred groups have severe genetic diseases, the costs typically being death, or costs offloaded onto 'host communities'.

Hadrian - Turks invaded Europe they would steal White children and indoctrinate them into Islam. After years and years of abuse these White children would grow into fanatical soldiers called Janissaries, and the Turks would then unleash them onto their own people, for whom they no longer felt any kinship towards, and for whom they had no mercy.
  The same basic thing happens today in the Jewish-run West. White children are indoctrinated into hating their own race over many years, and by high school they’re practically foaming at the mouth with self-hatred and aggression towards any Whites they see as “racist.”
  There was nothing inherently wrong with the European children the Turks brainwashed, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with our children that the Jews brainwash today. They are under the spell of their enemies,

Deep Revisionism of Jewish Beliefs
Use of Cruelty and Horror ... beliefs not explicit, not down on paper ... opposition comparable to Protocols hostility... Use of cruelty and horror .. false flags ... example of Vietnam: hypothesis that jews wanted money from weapons, bombs, expendables, bases has to be atrocity stories - if both sides just fraternised etc - very likely IRA and ETA fake skilled bombs.. atrocities to provoke war, keep bubbling..

Use of Divide and Rule (or divide and Profit) ... see below

Pretending to be part of movements for which there's some appeal ... White people seem more prone than others to consider the other person’s point of view) (Because of their individualistic tendencies that promote scientific [i.e., unbiased, objective] views of reality in which group interests are irrelevant, White people are arguably less prone to such tendencies.) Hence jews move in secretly - eg rationalism, socialism ... publishing, Hollywood ..patriotic all American people
  MACDONALD The emphasis in my talk is on individualism which I think is the root of the problem, but I begin by discussing two mechanisms that are also recurrent themes of TOO — that the current regime creates massive incentives for ambitious individuals to destroy their own people (especially appealing to sociopaths like Bill and Hillary Clinton and Tony Blair et al.) and that the domination of the moral and intellectual high ground by hostile elites results in many Whites accepting the legitimacy of their dispossession.
  MACDONALD
  individualism implies that coherent groups are based not on kinship but on reputation and accepting the moral framework of the group;
  top-down cortical control over lower brain mechanisms, such as ethnocentrism; control of the media and academic discourse by hostile elites encourages Whites to suppress their natural tribal tendencies (Whites are lower on ethnocentrism than other peoples, but certainly do not completely lack tribalism);
  the empathy/love/nurturance personality system which in the higher ranges results in relatively indiscriminate empathy and even pathological altruism.

hard working for fanaticism note

These three things [Purim, Kol Nidre and Moser] all warlike / ?similar thing with samurai/ ? gurkhas

-theoretical support for 'democracy'
-Jewish analogy: pointer dogs. cheating seabirds with shells. use of language like an ovipositor injecting eggs

"all human groups compete - they all do it" fallacy as parasitism is possible
      But I didn’t know before it is second nature for Jews to sort out “Who’s a Jew and who’s a Gentile” even at a distance. Most non-Jews still don’t realize this. Problem is, that aloof social attitude spreads among Gentiles. That “least standard” for interaction and amiability becomes the norm wherever they reside. I think that Jews degrade the social atmosphere of Gentile societies by this trait alone and lowering the bar for what is acceptable social interaction. I don’t think we comprehend the spiritual and emotional impact that Jewish aloofness has upon us in our communities. Jews feel a great distance from Gentiles naturally. They act that way, they transmit that standard, and they firm up that social distance everywhere they are except in a few small liberal towns that have enough naive Gentiles around. Then some of the Jews enjoy interacting with Gentiles under cloud of liberalism.

freedom means nothing to jews: free and easy life, exploration, voyaging round the world, try new things, experimenting, loud voiced declamations of spirited oratory, = not for jews or any parasites. Bound to the host.

human groups were small: whites were in small groups, maybe individualistic and all hands helping, high investment parenting: but when squashed together more pathological - checking on each other, not much inequality, shame/ guilt. jews perhaps similarly: when in enclosed tribe they might live and snarl at their east of the world, but never get there. Pathologies explode when groups larger.

In that remarkable period of expansion which opened with the accession of Queen Elizabeth, the foreign mercantile settlement in London ('the dining-room of Christendom' as Middleton called it) increased prodigiously. At the beginning of the reign there were less than 3,000 aliens in the city; at its close there were some 10,000. Among them was inevitably, as before, a considerable sprinkling of Spanish and Portuguese New Christians, again encouraged by the possibilities of tolerance heralded by the overthrow of Roman Catholicism. The intensification of commercial intercourse with southern Europe gave these refugees fresh opportunities, and during the war with Spain they were used by London merchants as a cloak for trade with the Peninsula. Thus the Marrano community again expanded, its hundred or more members including a few persons of outstanding ability and some prominence in public life. At their head was Hextor Nunez (generally known as ‘Dr. Hectour’), one of the handful of persons who had remained. Through a qualified and practising physician, he also engaged in foreign trade on a large scale. His widespread business and personal connexions abroad were found extremely useful by the government. He enjoyed the confidence both of Burleigh and of Walsingham, and on one occasion left his dinner-table to bring the latter the first news of the arrival of the Great Armada at Lisbon. [ROTH ON JEWS]

In 1512 the great Marrano mercantile and financial house of Mendes, which controlled the coveted pepper monopoly and at one time all but rivalled the Fuggers in the extent and importance of their transactions, established its Antwerp branch. Its operations, carried on largely through New Christian agents, speedily spread across the North Sea. Ultimately it became entrusted with the loan transactions of the English treasury; and when in 1532 proceedings were taken on a charge of Judaizing against Diogo Mendes, the head of the Antwerp establishment, Henry VIII personally intervened on his behalf.

Theories of parasitism. [examples] parasites known from time immemorial. Recent detailed observations of animals and plants.
      parasitos = sitting beside - something like a fool in the entertaining sense. Modern use 'first recorded in 1640s'
      A parasite that lives inside the body of its host is called an endoparasite. Endoparasites include organisms such as tapeworms, hookworms, and trypanosomes that live within the host's organs or tissues, as well as organisms such as sporozoans that invade the host's cells. -- must post date awareness of spores, transmitted diseases eg malaria | and detailed observation | 1880 first sight of 'malaria' protozoan parasite | idea of sickle cell protection post-ww2! | note on Christian conspiracy of silence about tapeworm - why would god create a tapeworm?

learning from parasites - fiery serpent - flukes, schistosomiasis, malaria - feathers, fans, oars, houses, sharp implements, hives, types of food, nests, string, sails, working in packs, secure shelters, spiny protection, scaly ditto -- is it possible hot climates suggest parasitic modes of life to preliterates?
spontaneous generation not a silly idea
cart horse
animals in herds which graze
-parasites like rafflesia can be big and unrestrained

Yes. But Jewish kleptoparasitism is more complicated: in effect, it involves targeting the abundantly-supplied, secretly looting them, and using that loot for themselves and to keep down opposition, by fomenting discord, bribing supporters, and damaging the hosts mentally and physically. And at some point moving to another host. If a biologist could find an analogy in the animal or plant world, it would be a terrific mnemonic to get the whole idea across to large numbers of people.

This may be helpful in pinning a few concepts down. (Or it may not; I'm not sure).--

'Kleptoparasitism' (=theft parasitism) expresses the idea of looting assets of, rather than eating, the host. But it omits the idea of neuroparasitism, i.e. changing behaviour by neurological means, as some parasites do that cause e.g. ants to behave suicidally. So 'kleptoneuroparasitism' seems to combine both. Except that in human hosts it's the brain that matters; it's controlling psychology by language, not by deceiving the nervous system by e.g. mimicking sounds or chemicals. So 'kleptopsychoparasitism' seems better. But there's another issue: intentional hostility and harm. A charming kleptoparasite might intend to other damage than grabbing things. However people like Soros, Kissinger as nauseam clearly intend harm. They are not 'malevolent'; malevolent means 'wishes harm / damage'. 'Maleficent' is the word - 'causes, does, carries out, harm'. So 'Maleficent kleptopsychoparasitism' is just about right. But it omits the element of passivity in the hosts; they are often non-immune, and don't fight back. So we have
      'Maleficent kleptopsychoparasitism of non-immune hosts'. Or MFKPP or MKPP.

@some guy — “The survival of the host is paramount to the survival of the parasite.” ..... With respect, this isn’t true. Parasites need ways to move between hosts. Appropriately enough, this often involves faeces or blood, or entry into weak points, or laying eggs. There are fairly exact parallels with Jews moving from place to place.

*Note on nomads: security of animals as great or more difficult than agriculture as animals are more concentrated in value; and they can be harmed or killed fairly easily; consider dead cattle etc - must leave traces?

cp jews moving into territories with missionaries to illustrate difference

=============
Remember, according to the usual interpretation Jesus is supposed to be the Messiah foretold by the Jewish prophets. ...”
      ... A quick Google shows the OT at 600K words is more than three times the length of the NT (180K words — well, in English trans.)
      ... You’re just assuming that the Jewish view is important, I think because of familiarity: it’s repeated so often you take it for granted. The difficulty is that (e.g.) Confucianism isn’t preceded by a much longer into listing wars of Han Chinese against others. Buddhism’s texts (as far as I know) are about Buddha, not preceded by a huge wad of material on wars in India. The Roman empire had temples all over the place, usually to the ‘genius loci’ — the spirit of the place; could be Egyptian religions, for example. I’m assuming the Roman ‘conversion’ was political: they wanted their empire to hold together, and encouraging the components to be peaceful would help. The whole story of Jesus is obviously rigged up: there’s no evidence such a person existed. Even if he did, what does the opinion of some bearded freaks matter? Greeks, Romans, people in what’s now Spain, France, Italy, Romania, Egypt, North Africa, Persia all had assorted religious/ amusing/ wise stories and tales and chronicles. Certainly Egyptian ones were written down. I don’t see why the Romans should have spontaneously picked out some marginal and irritating group. In fact I have to wonder whether early Bibles, as invented by early Catholicism, included the OT at all. Why not just have Jesus and post-Jesus material?

white opportunism inc fake astronauts as downside

[The file big-lies.org/jew-parasites.html includes the original version of the following, plus examples - rerev]

I may add another point (please excuse my poor English) : About a year ago at the Thiazi forum which has by now been shut down by the “German” government there was an interesting and competent discussion about the different impressions that different racial and sub-racial types make.
It started with the question whether Cro-Magnon-types or Aurignac-Types look more dangerous.
For example, there is a certain physiological type, common in all races that looks brutish, impressive, bear-like, full of primitive physical strength. In the European races this is represented by the Cro-Magnon specimen. Their bodies and faces tell you: “Careful, I am strong!”. But there is also a type that looks more elegant, cunning, wolf-like. This is represented by the Aurignac type. Their message is: “Be careful, I am fast!” Whenever a tribe would conquer another one the representatives of both this Alpha male groups would recognize, battle, exterminate or respect each other.
In contrast, subdominant types like the Alpinoid that arose from the cleansed rests of conquered and enslaved early Cro-Magnon people (in Europe) or conquered and enslaved other groups in the rest of the world) look totally different. They have this “I am harmless, do not hurt me”-feminine, round, fatty, small appearance, together with a cyclotyme temper (emotional, social, multi-tasking etc.) in contrast to shizotyme or viscous temper of Alpha males (shizotyme~fanatical, intellectual, ingenious~Aurignac; viscous~pain-resistant,unbreakable~Cro-Magnon).
Typically, whole races that have been driven to the edges of extinction or the fringe by stronger ethnicities tend to appear subdominant. Just take South American jungle indios in contrast to the highly developed Plains Indians (although they represent yet another Alpha type, the Dinaric one, which is in European peoples represented by certain types from the Balcans or in ancient Rome: a good example would be Julius Caesar. Dinaric ~ “mature,old” — comparable to the impression that for example birds and reptiles make).
But in the area of the fertile crecent, the middle East, the place where for the longest time in observable history humans lived together in city-civilizations, yet another, third grup, could develop. The specimen of this group tend to look like beta-males (take Henry Kissinger, does he not look cute and harmless?) where they in fact are parasitic and aggressive. Of course they need to DECEIVE their counterparts, they do not want to let them see their true nature. Their every physical characteristic was selected for this purpose. Their eyes are without any clarity, pale and cloudy, so that you cannot guess their intentions. Their body language is deceitful, the voice intonation and language talent is programmed to hide, instead of reveal their true intentions.
      In this respect it is utterly wrong to say that Jews are semitic in the sense of an anthropologic group. In fact, what we identify as typical Jewish features is anthropologically known as the “reduced Armenian or Armenoid type”. True semitic people on the other hand, if they are not degenerated tend to look strongly Dinaric (mature, deep and harsh facial structures, hawk-like noses); if reduced or degenerated Levantine, they look like Beta-males of the more unpleasant sort (but not “cute” = likable, friendly). This explains to some extend the authors instinctive reactions, instincts that were to his own surprise misguiding him; just like the cocoo misguides his adoptive parents.
One last thought: Why did our ancestors let the Jews come and live among them? Why did they not conquer, destroy or repell them? why did they not integrate them? Because the Jews were neither really a subordinated or conquered race like for example the blacks in India, but they appeared just as harmless as any of these. And because the were not looking like Alpha males (at least after their ethnogenesis was completed in Babylon and they ceased to be Semites in the sense of “the scum of Egypt”) but even more of a threat as any Alpha-appearing group.
      The same is true with gypsies, although to a lesser degree of perfection since they came from a younger city-civilization and their selection process is not finished.

control experiments: look at gipsies. Muslims. thuggee. consider Catholics as isolating people with intelligence/ abstraction but also fanaticism, attachment to paradoxes and errors Parasitism and Unoriginality
mimicry Theories of mimicry. Even 'Jews' idea is copied. Changes of name. New York Times looks like a serious newspaper. uncreative. language not their own. mimicry as professors, Einstein, Freud etc. possibly screeching reflex such as 'racist' to any comment on Muslims, Scots, Pakistanis, Mexicans is the way Jews 'think' - it means some hostility is detected. hence bullshit over races not existing, or races being almost indistinguishable. Similarly with say eugenics - lots of online comments on how bad it is, without any analysis, suggesting it's identified by 'jews' instinct as threatening thru identifying Jews as own breeding policy, or improving other races. And also insistence jews are the same as any other group, such as the Chinese or Muslims [sic - latter of course includes conversions) whereas they are as different as parasitic bees are from normal other colonies of bees.

Short term emotion (cp short term memory) essential to avoid attacks etc; long term emotion is or can be more reflective

Genetics

Learning
learning as intense and lasting frog analogy in south America look at eg simple Barbara spect?er
coloured frogs in s america- maybe some people learn more immovably than others?

opportunism: theft? violence? rape? damage? never ... if possible. constant character vs volatile

German topography has molded the Germans into a race of keen observers. They have been surrounded by other people for hundreds of years. Every German can tell the difference between the French, Dutch, Lithuanian, Polish, Russian, Czech, Slovak, Hungarian, Croatian, Serbian, and Italian peoples. Some of the peoples are branches of the Nordic-Teutonic race; others are Slavs, and still others belong to the Mediterranean race. The Germans, through their close personal contact with these many peoples, stand in the best position to understand their several national ambitions, aspirations, and racial sensibilities.

Psychological Tests Note on 'intelligence tests' to do with objectivity and analysis and recording: pencil and paper, language, arithmetic, space.


Behaviour
carthorses, ponies, racehorses

I think jews are propelled by genetic impulses. They are driven to do things, as bulldogs presumably want to attack bulls, and hyenas want to attack in groups. Also they tell lies: in the past, barefaced lying has often worked, because forensic techniques and evidence hardly existed. But now they can be positively identified as telling lies. I hope they're on the way out.

Theories of behaviour. repetitive behaviour suggests simple genetic basis. [microchess chess program analogy/ tiny spider analogy]Character tests weakness to lies: psychopaths (renamed sociopaths) as con artists with no conscience and no sympathy. Possible traits: desire to harm others, something like aggressiveness against people with superior lives, organisations, cities, education: try to harm with immigration, attacks, tax burdens, dumbing-down. Spoil peace, cause wars. Must be attracted to positions where they can issue commands: courts, parliaments, libraries, media, teachers, trade unions. probably by sensing source of hostile power and tracking it, rather than intellect. eg. court orders something; instinct is to attack, but slower process to infiltrate courts etc/ or with money to steal, then enter banks etc; or wars, infiltrate armies etc, weapons etc; or education - instinct to kill teachers; or enter teaching, etc; or media - eg radio stuff then enter radio related fields. Need to conceal aims, as murderers or arsonists or looters need to. Or of course theft of what have been learned to be 'good things'


*Fanaticism: slightly more difficult to explain. A rigid mental model of the world tends to cause decisive and determined behaviour. The huge expansion of Islam when it was new; the separation from India of W and E Pakistan in 1948, with massive massacres; the destruction of an ancient Buddha recently are typical manifestations of fanaticism. Jewish behaviour can include years of study of work in law, politics, media, academia etc, not for career reasons, but with the extra motive of causing damage to goyim. And as with Islam, destructive behaviour becomes almost an instinct, as for example the mass murders of the USSR, the bombing and chemical warfare in Vietnam, the deliberate damage to Sweden (see the Barbara Lerner Spectre videos). It's difficult to imagine any civilised people doing these sorts of things.
      Religion: note that neither cult is simply a 'religion' in the usual western sense, which is a system of beliefs backed by some sort of creed, which can be changed if the religious person feels like it. Islam and Judaism are lifestyles rather than religions. To illustrate, someone in Switzerland defended Islamification in Switzerland by saying "the Swiss Constitution guarantees freedom of religion." She couldn't understand that Islam is a lifestyle: the Swiss Constitution does not guarantee polygamy, deliberate miseducation, prostitution of Kufr girls, genital mutilation, death threats against converts out.

Differences between Judaism and Islam
      *Sheer population numbers - Islam is not particularist, unlike Judaism, and can spread anywhere; there are 1.6 billion reasons for concern
      *Jihad - struggle. It's only recommended when the population proportion is above 20%. Mass murders arranged by Jews are historically comparable, but the machanism is different, because they expected to be a minority. EXCEPT THAT it's now generally accepted that the Khazar conversion is the source of most modern Jewry, despite their being not 'Semites'. (Some people think only a Khazar elite were converted, but this seems unlikely in view of the large numbers in Poland, Russia, and eastern Europe generally). In effect modern Zionism is something like a Jihad, but operates differently.
      *Although both ideologies are parasitic, the differences are caused by population numbers, and by geography. Judaism is (vaguely) like a behaviour-changing tapeworm, Islam like a swarm of dangerous locusts. Islam until recently, unlike Judaism, had no great resources to exploit. A similar comment applies to democracy: both are theocratic rather than undemocratic, but in practice there have been many more Muslim theocracies

      *Judaism is almost always a minority cult (though in pre-USSR Russia, in some areas Jews and Orthodox Russians were about equal in numbers). It is therefore natural, and almost inevitable, that Jewish power must be secret - with lies, deception, secret 'education' amongst themselves, long-term secret planning, subversion of some goyim and their institutions, vicious reactions when exposed - if possible; if not, slimy and wheedling reactions when exposed.

      *Descent is supposedly by female line in Jews, male line in Muslims
How are the similarities evaded?

      * Selection of sources. Western newspapers are mostly owned by Jews. Intelligence stuff is usually from secret sources. Absurdly biased funded quangos - In Britain, corrupt outfits such as the Runnymede Trust, the 'Equalities and Human Rights Commission', the Muslim Council of Britain, are treated as though independent.

      * Simple bias. Omission for example by Jews of the Deir Yassin massacres, or British troops hanged in Jerusalem. And nothing about remote killing by drones in e.g. Afghanistan, so we have the ridiculous hypocrisy about a few deaths in one area vs. huge numbers of the 'enemy'.

?facial charcateristics photograhpy could be scientific unlike the past with pictures - as ID genetics and DNA

? adaptive when they could get away with it, presuambly. BUT now with permanent records transferable deeds will follow eg Skokie 1977 as fraud one of many and BUT
      **for the first time, situations are not favorable to jews. Secrecy used to be easy, and therefore lie s hard to detect. Jews only had to move to the next town. Now, news travels instantaneously. Roughly speaking, the opportunity for successful lies has decreased sharply. Scenario: Jews caught in some financial fraud says he's innocent. Immediately, evidence is collected showing he's guilty. As genetically evolved, he simply lies. Same again. Jews i Britain eg think they can lie about child sex and people will simply forget or not know. However, the evidence can now be repeatedly presented. They seem to have no defence against this.

JEWS AS A NATION BUT SPREAD ABOUT - hence proxies for their activities

Vanessa April 15, 2015
Hadrian, you’re right about who invited them. It was kings in need of tax farmers, perhaps even some of the nobility. What I don’t understand is how the landed gentry tolerated them for a second.
      Why did no one think to ask, “Who are these people with the funny hats and why are they moving into the new gated communities?”
      “Oh they’re Jews coming to collect our taxes and loan us money at 2000% interest.”
      “Jews, you say? Why do they call themselves Jews? What do they believe in?”
      “Oh they believe they are Yahweh’s chosen people. He’s the god of jealousy, revenge and genocide. They believe a Jewish messiah will come one day and put us all under their boot, then they will rule us with an iron rod. Rumor is their founding father was a convicted murderer named Moses or Moshe. But God didn’t mind that he was a murderer because he only killed Egyptian goyim — who Yahweh hates with a passion. As well as a few other people who displeased him like this one guy who accidentally touched a wooden box called ‘the ark of the covenant’. Oh and their patriarch Abraham, Yahweh loved him the most because he tried to murder his son to make Yahweh happy and promised to give the whole world everything in it to his descendants as long as they cut their penises and let a mohel suck the blood and not put meat and cheese on their sandwiches. They use to throw their own children in the fires but they stopped that. Now the really hard-core Jews do sometimes kidnap and murder children, but only young goyim boys under seven, the Jews’ magical number. But after a while you’ll get used to it and won’t even notice your children are gone and you’ll be happy they’re in a better place, a Jew heaven up in the sky with Yahweh. Yep, they’re a fine bunch.The salt of the earth!”

Galloway The greatest people on the earth were Jews. The leaders of the socialist, communist, trades union, liberal, enlightenment, throughout the 17th, 18th, 19th centuries, were great Jews.

Populations at present are like children of drug-addicted mothers, but repeated until everyone has it. Hard to predict what may happen on emergence to normality. or populations largely infected with parasites

theories of genetics and e.g. must have been accrual into Jews of psychopathic types, and leaving of normal types.

Are Jews Unaware of what They Do? note on pappworth and amnesia test

Evidence on Jews may be missing as Jews may buy up papers etc. discovering Talmud and whatever other material they consider important. Jews in London, Jews in New york. insert comment on chattering classes and censorship - possible to infer who is parasitised/ also comment on control so alternative ideas are almost entirely suppressed (as in Orwell's memory hole)

Jews not a normal group with territory, food, shelter, culture - instead a group of psychopaths: compare eg a woodland with different types of trees, plus say Dutch elm disease: d e is the odd one out. Or say goats, sheep cattle, horses, rabbits on grassland: plus tapeworms. or birds: sparrows robins, thrushes, and magpies

Increases in Knowledge in the Past Few Centuries... very impressive, partly a cause of Jewish power increase; without it they could not have e.g. been decisive in causing world wars. [Note on huge upheaval of WW2 even in ... just because Germany wanted Jew-free finance]

Applying Knowledge to the Jewish Problem. note of space: they had representatives like a multinational corp / control of paper money and media and eg think tanks ['every human rights organization supports immigration' translates all the Jew-run and Jew-funded 'think tanks' agree that white countries should have immigration and other information is ignored]
On Separating Out Jewish Influence from non-Jews SEPARATING OUT JEWISH influence to decide what should be done examples inc j s mill on like a child, taking the British side/v war/ Fed/ Ukraine/ nuclear stuff/ 'our' government/ British empire and China profiteering vs jews / liberalism etc above/ importance OF PAPER MONEY -bbc - cohen, camoron and Miliband interviewed by paxman, Dimbleby on question time, son of holohoax liar, all Jews -- Jonathan swift style Cohen oozing shit and flinging it and censoring honest people...

WOULD JEWS BE MORE POWERFUL WITHOUT ISRAEL???

The British Empire RULED The world, in 1939. Its Pound the most powerful currency, and controlled 500 million people! They had “Imperial preference’, on the sea lanes,and gold reserves unsurpassed. They had the NERVE to declare war on Germany- who DID NOT THREATEN,OR ATTACK THEM (as in WW1 too) all because of Hitler's legitimate border disputes,caused by the chaos of the Versailles System. “We care not who rules Germany, but seek its total destruction” Winston Churchill. SEE: CHURCH ILL'S WAR: David Irving Action Report.Com. HITLERS WAR- What Historians fail To Mention.YT. Ben Freeman: A Jewish Defector Warns America About The Jews — YT. HITLERS MESSAGE TO THE NWO- YT.

self deception -- Well written, and indeed the whole crypsis and polymorphic deception by so-called ‘Jews’ is remarkable.

Can I briefly make a case for ‘Jewish’ ‘self-deception’ being. in fact, mostly a fake. when the person you quote talks of the Second World War, is it by chance that there is no mention of Jewish victories and triumphs in massacring Russians? Is it pure chance that the fraudulent Holohoax is assumed true? Is it by accident that 9/11 is always attributed to a small group, and not the real group? When Spielberg quotes whoever saves a life, it is considered as if he saved an entire world, is it pure chance that he omits the adjective ‘Jewish’? Is it mere coincidence that causes Jewish commentators to never mention Iraqi deaths, or Palestinian lives, or Jewish control over money? Of course it isn’t. ‘Self deception’? No.

The only exception I can think of is the mass of common Jews; it’s difficult to know what (if anything) they think, since telling lies seems to be instinctive with them. They may be genuinely deceived, though it seems unlikely to me. We may increasingly find out as Internet expands.

---
@ Sgt Pepper — “verbal slickness exceeds his intellectual powers. Faced with an argument that disturbs him emotionally, he cannot confine himself to the truth, let alone logic.” ... I don’t believe the self-deception idea at all. It’s just acting. Caught in some lie, obviously they blubber, get enraged, pretend to be ill, or whatever. They love broadcasting, film, radio, the jewspapers, because they are almost entirely one way. Internet, and also things like photographs and better detailed records, are changing that. A fairly definitive disproof of ‘self deception’ would be secretly recorded details of discussions between jews; I have no doubt what would be revealed would be similar to opened secret archives on jewish behaviour in (say) the USSR and Poland. Again, the technical possibilities here favour us against them.
      In short, the ‘self deception’ argument is just another defence mechanism.

I have been saying for some time now that, if the second Jacobite rising [attempt by james viii and french allies to regain the British throne for the exiled House of Stuart 1689, 1708 NOT 1745] had been successful, which it very nearly was, then Charles Stuart would have closed the bank of England and maybe kicked the Jews out. I am Scottish and since I have become Jew wise I have realised what it was all about. But, try telling people in Scotland this, they will think you are mad. They still regard it as a Scottish V’s English conflict.

What you've got to understand about blacks and others who play into black victimization is that they have a different definition of a "lie" than we do. In their mind, a lie is NOT an untrue statement, but a statement that they don't like. Therefore, when they say that what you're saying isn't true, they aren't accusing you of making an untrue statement, they're telling you that they don't like what you're saying.
======
And yes, I agree they are psychopaths. The Jews are crazy; furthermore, the nature of their craziness is such that the Jews themselves don’t know they are crazy. If suddenly the Jews saw themselves as the rest of the world sees them— if suddenly the Jews saw themselves as they actually are— I think they would be deeply ashamed and horrified; in fact, I would not be at all surprised by a very large number of suicides.
—————
Psychopaths know full well what they are doing and simply do not care, which is what makes them psychos by definition. I think jews are the same. So all this talk about jewish self-deception is just us normal people projecting what mental gymnastics we would have to engage in order to do what jews do, simply as a matter of course. When jews talk about them being blameless and that we are mentally ill for being anti-semites its just them lying and trying to con us with their chutzpah and deceitfulness.
======
Hadrian
Jews flooded into America after the Civil War due to “persecution” in Russia. They hadn’t even taken two steps off the boats before they started forming revolutionary organizations and infiltrating the government. By 1913 Jews established the Fed and their takeover of America was complete; what took the Jews centuries to achieve in Europe they achieved in about 30 years in America. Several years later they brought America into WWI and funded the Bolshevik takeover of Russia, and two decades later they were riling up Americans to go overseas and kill Germans in WWII. Jews may or may not have been instrumental in starting the Civil War but by WWII they had complete control of the American media, financial system, and government. Denying it is pointless.
==========
Also there is no necessity for conflict. I think this is a perception due to Jews, whose modus operandi relies on causing conflict and benefiting from it. BUT it doesn’t necessarily follow for non-parasite groups. If there are two settled groups A and B, and it costs more to fight than to not fight, they may as well not fight. (‘Costs’ including deaths, options forgone, consequences such as illness and disruption and damage). We’ve had at least 500 years of deliberate Jewish harm. We are like peoples infested through and through with mental parasites. If these are removed, many assumptions will I hope be reconsidered..

=================================== Rose Madder May 6, 2015 - 9:51 pm | Permalink Do we put too much emphasis on mental explanations for white behaviour? There is much discussion of mental attitudes, religious beliefs and other mental phenomenon for Swedish and northern European behaviours and attitudes. In the past I fell into this way of thinking, until, I was exposed to the physiology of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and how greatly it varies between individuals (metabolic diversity). The following summary is of course very simplified. There is a fair amount of tantalizing information about the intersection of the ANS, environment, diet and behaviour. Much of this information was collected and analyzed by the mid twentieth century but then dropped as far as I can tell. I’m going to summarize what I have understood so far about this research and how it applies to the Swedish situation. My background is Norwegian and German, so I have first hand experience being northern European stock and observing my relatives. I also grew up with a father who has 12 years post secondary in sciences and I grew up on the nature / nurture debate. But, I have no formal post secondary education in physiology or science. I would love to see others look into my citations and see if this material can contribute to white survival. Most people have heard of the ANS, but may be less familiar with its two branches, sympathetic and parasympathetic. Many will have also heard of “fight and flight” (sympathetic branch) and “rest and digest” (parasympathetic branch). Each of these branches regulates the hormones that create aggression vs surrender. When an animal is attacked, there is a huge rush of adrenaline for the fight and flight, however when the fight and flight is exhausted there is a final stage of surrender and die. That final stage is the parasympathetic response. I believe the parasympathetic response may be what causes the near death experience. It relieves the suffering of a doomed animal at death. In the early 20th century Dr. Francis Pottenger Sr. studies the ANS in detail. I read his 600 page book on the subject. What he documents is that humans are not born equal in terms of ANS strength. He had patients who had very strong sympathetic system. He describes their mental traits and physical condition, plus the diseases they are subject to. He does the same for people with strong parasympathetic systems. They are prone to completely different set of diseases and mental proclivities. Pottenger used simple nutrients to correct the ANS imbalance with success. No one appears to have picked his work up again until the 60s when there was some privately funded work. Here is where we get back to Swedes and other northern Europeans. Northern peoples, including Europeans and Inuit lived in a cold climate and adapted to a diet high in animal products. Animal products have a very different effect on ANS functioning than plant food does. People who couldn’t survive a diet hight in animal products would die out. Strong parasympathetic response is damped by the nutrients in animal foods leading to balance ANS functioning. Strong parasympathetic response without the balancing effect of an indigenous diet leads to depression, melancholy, passivity even “pathological empathy”. In other words it can be very difficult to get a weak sympathetic nervous system to muster a FIGHT response. More aggressive people tend to come from climates that provide more plant materials. These people have stronger sympathetic responses and less empathy, more aggression. In different populations there will be a preponderance of type based on the climate and foods the group had to eat to survive. The aggregate of these varieties of ANS types may be what gives us our sense of a ethic personality. Stoic versus reactive and excitable. I have often wondered about the mechanics of genetics. Most of what I hear is the gene for this and the gene for that, without any mention of actual mechanics. What exactly is being inherited? ANS is a regulation system that controls metabolism and brain function, personality expression. There is a lot more to this but hopefully this gives a clear jumping off point to imagine the implications of this information for others to contemplate. References: Viihljamer Stephenson Francis Pottenger Sr. Weston Price Roger Williams Dr Ernst Gelhorn George Watson Dr Nick Gonzalez Dr W Kelly =================================== TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT on Eysenck and note on need for new approach involving psychotic impulses of greed, detestation, attacking better groups, lying, deception

jews and SYNERGY WITH SOME GROUP eg aristocrats or new party to advance own ends / synergy with two groups eg 2 govts to fight each other
Jews never oppose the 'traditional culture' (whatever that’s supposed to mean) of the West directly by presenting an alternative that they claim is morally superior. Rather, they work within the traditional framework of moral values established by Christianity, the ultimate source of Western morality. Moral authority comes from the Bible, churches, and Jesus, not Freud or Karl Marx. Anti-racism and philosemitism are things already present within Christianity, and all the Jew does is draw them out. Any positive moral value ascribed to these things is only possible because Christianity already endorses them. The stress laid on universal brotherhood in the Bible is the source of communism’s attraction;


“A major part of the Jewish evolutionary strategy is therefore the penetration of White society, assisted by the adoption of the outward appearance of conforming to White norms, thereby enabling the untroubled transfer of resources from Whites to the cryptic Jewish population.” --- This is “step one.” “Step two” is changing the demographics through open immigration. --- Promoting diversity and multiculturalism weakens (and ultimately destroys) White norms. Also, frequently young Whites are encouraged to act like Blacks, adopting and expressing their culture. These changes allow the Jewish population to express their Jewishness more openly.

BRITAIN VS USA WAR 1812ish Zionist really have a score to settle with the white westerners because men like George Washington,Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson broke up the Zionist banking racket in the past. The bankers launch the war. Nathan Rothschild, of the Bank of England, issued an ultimatum: “Either the application for the renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.” Jackson and the American patriots did not believe the power of the international moneylenders could extend so far. “You are a den of thieves-vipers,” Jackson told them. “I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out!” Nathan Rothschild issued orders: “Teach these impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to Colonial status.” This is why Zionist absolutely need to destroy white-America, because their ancestors dare to stand up against their Tyranny.


Most people have no clue how deep the Jewish problem goes. Those who know must either keep quiet or become targets of the government, of the jewish media, of Jewish anti-White networks and their antifa friends.

BigJazzer, I'm still waiting for your comment. Direct me to original research by Jews condemning the Fed, condemning Jewish mass murders in the USSR, condemning the Holohoax fraud, condemning Kissinger's mass murders, condemning Jews in Palestine, condemning Jews and the slave trade, condemning Jewish media lies on black violence, condemning the Jewish 'holy books' etc. if there are so many decent Jews you'll have no difficulty finding plenty of examples. Will you? [Added later - I forgot 9/11, promotion of wars and funding both sides, promoting the Second World War just for money, causing depressions, opium wars...]? Judaism discovered Hoffman 1100 pages (analogy with two sets of accounting books for nonjews and insiders absurdity of claim they are just another group is nonsense - their rule books clearly state what they do and therefore why they should be ruled out presumably special treatment through biblical stuff The criminal negligence of 'thinkers' is truly shocking. Military types have been accused of preparing for the last war but one; but thinkers and teachers are often enough centuries, or millennia, out of date.



THUGGEE [added to occidental observer and Jews on 15 ap 2015 at 00.09 hours UTC time zone] For generations the Thugs went almost completely unchecked. The British government, calmly tallying "misadventures," remained unconcerned because Thugs killed almost no Europeans. As for the natives themselves, Thugs terrorized peasants & bribed rajahs & landowners to ignore or protect them. Thugs were often of the Brahman caste. When they were arrested, they were almost invariably released for lack of evidence. It was as if the Thugs (corrupted from thags, Hindustani for "deceivers") had managed to keep the country hypnotized. The Thug modus operandi was to assume the guise of peaceful travelers. Joining parties with their victims, they would charm them right up to the moment at which one designated Thug would seize a doomed man's wrists while another Thug would strangle him from behind with a noose of white or yellow silk—Kali's favorite colors. Sometimes talented Thugs would play the sitar & coax their victims into singing, the better to expose their throats for throttling. Not only did the Thugs kill without remorse but "with pleasure," as they confessed, sanctified by omens before & prayers afterward. Thug son succeeded Thug father in the family business. But even after as many as eleven generations had accumulated fortunes, Thugs & scions of Thugs went on doing their thing. Shrewd appraisers of rich victims, they carefully scouted out their targets. But they had no objection to the impromptu murder of a party of four—for as little as 20 gold pieces & a handful of rupees. Whatever drove the Thugs—probably a mixture of greed, blood lust & corrupted religious fervor—their energy & enterprise were astonishing. One boasted of 931 murders in a fruitful 40-year career.

churchill - did he transfer assets from britain and france and germany to jews? like thatcher - cp irving on roosevelt as in effect beneficiary

BIBLE TRANS NOTES Heinrich Graetz [German Jew] tells us,

"with its monkish figures, its exorcists, its praying brethren, and pietistic saints, supplied no models for warriors contending with a faithless king, a false aristocracy and unholy priests. Only the great heroes of the Old Testament, with fear of God in their hearts and the sword in their hands, at once religious and national champions, could serve as models for the Puritans: the Judges, freeing the oppressed people from the yoke of foreign domination; Saul, David, and Joab routing the foes of their country; and Jehu, making an end of an idolatrous and blasphemous house—these were favorite characters with Puritan warriors. In every verse of the books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings, they saw their own condition reflected; every psalm seemed composed for them, to teach them that, though surrounded on every side by ungodly foes, they need not fear while they trusted in God. Oliver Cromwell compared himself to the judge Gideon, who first obeyed the voice of God hesitatingly, but afterwards courageously scattered the attacking heathens; or to Judas Maccabaeus, who out of a handful of martyrs formed a host of victorious warriors."

César Tort. Once more with his “blame the Whites” The only whites that are to blame are those protestants that emancipated the jews and gave them control of the central bank and money printing. Nobody can compete with unlimited supplies of money for arms, bribery , the financing of subversive organisations, buying the media, books, television, pharmaceutical companies, schools, and universities etc.etc.! Blame Oliver Cromwell,.!

... Italian Renaissance represented true European culture, not barbarous Semitic fairy tales. ...

POPULATION DENSITY ARGUMENT eg if jews squashed together in their hovels, however fierce and vicious their talk, they couldn't do much - only when they expanded out to UK and US and in US set up Fed in 1913 - 20 years? 30 years? - sim individualist whites spread out: if one group found rich food source, or some useful material, it would have local effect; now they can be individualistic at the expense of each other.

?storytelling in winters in frozen north may have had some effect

individuality and creativity - can be creative of evil, or irrelevance - pigeon fancying? horse racing? flower arranging? knitting? crosswords? puzzles?

individuality may mean bribable - look for opportunities, for rich veins of food or housing or territory

Christianity: was OT included for malicious/ jewish reasons? might have been - first time available to all... USA Christians affected by OT and being little educated (bible may have been only book they read) jewish beliefs perhaps like the talmud affecting Khazars something like 1000 years earlier Catholicism seems to have been anti-jews money, but reformation often sided with jews; coincidence? Charles II to Geo I
    In good King Charles' golden time, when loyalty no harm meant,
    A zealous high churchman was I, and so I gained preferment.
    To teach my flock, I never missed: Kings are by God appointed
    And damned are those who dare resist or touch the Lord's anointed!

    When royal James possessed the crown, and popery came in fashion,
    The penal laws I hooted down, and read the Declaration.
    The Church of Rome, I found, did fit full well my constitution
    And I had been a Jesuit, but for the Revolution.

    When William was our King declared, to ease the nation's grievance,
    With this new wind about I steered, and swore to him allegiance.
    Old principles I did revoke; Set conscience at a distance,
    Passive obedience was a joke, a jest was non-resistance.

    When Royal Anne became our queen, the Church of England's glory,
    Another face of things was seen, and I became a Tory.
    Occasional conformists base; I blamed their moderation;
    And thought the Church in danger was from such prevarication.

    When George in pudding time came o'er, and moderate men looked big, sir
    My principles I changed once more, and I became a Whig, sir.
    And thus preferment I procured From our new Faith's Defender,
    And almost every day abjured the Pope and the Pretender.

    The illustrious House of Hanover and Protestant succession
    To these I do allegiance swear - while they can hold possession.
    For in my faith and loyalty I never more will falter,
    And George my lawful king shall be - until the times do alter.

SCOTLAND - Jews not expelled / scottish hebrew / prince charlie, war in fact about jewish money [quote from ireland/ scotland]
NAPOLEON - quote from that piece and cp with stalin
'INDIVIDUALISM' downside - take money to maim foreigners, and damage their own people, and waste time - orwell on stamps, chess, pigeon racing...
GUILT SHAME internal feeling must do something poss related to evolution of thinking ahead (as cp blacks with no planning)
PSYCHOLOGY: inability to detect what's important ... knitting, flower arranging, mills and boon, thrillers...
EYSENCK: note MacDonald calls the 'limbic system' the 'lower' stuff


1215: Magna Carta [6x-9x-russell]
1361: [Action liable to cause breach of peace. In ]
1401: De haeretico comburendo. [This is a 'statute'] [Note: modern parallel?]
15th century: Truck Acts date back to 15 C [red notebook]
1536: Act of Dissolution
1539: Burning for denying the doctrine of Transubstantiation etc [Luckock]
1550: Act Against Superstitious Books [NB: book burning in England?]
[1555: Proclamation against Books; see Foxe's Book of Martryrs]
1624: The Statute of Monopolies (in H S Hatfield, Inventions, 169-170)
1627: Petition of Rights. (OCEL says 1628; & see appendix of Stubbs) '.. demand put forward by the Commons.. no imprisonment without cause shown, no forced loans or taxes imposed with parliamentary grant, no martial law or enforced billeting. The Petition was reluctantly accepted by Charles I and became law. The point of proceeding by the method of a 'Petition of Right' instead of a 'Bill' was that the Crown had to give an immediate answer instead of waiting for the end of the session.'
1649: Act for the Propagation of the Gospel in Wales [Hutton]
1651: First Navigation Act [Parkinson, East and West]/ BUT 1660 onwards: Navigation Acts - compulsory registration of British ships [book on shipping]
1662: Hearth Tax introduced [See Unett, 'Making a Pedigree']
1662: Act of Uniformity [Smith, 'Cathedrals', myth of Cromwell damage/ Hutton]
1664: Conventicle Act [in Hutton]
1665: Five Mile Act [in Hutton]
1672: Declaration of Indulgence [in Hutton]
1673: Test Act [in Hutton]
1678: [don't know name:] body must be 'buried in woollen' [M Baker on Folklore]
1679: Habeas corpus [see appendix, of Stubbs]
1680: Exclusion Bill [in Hutton]
1689: Bill of Rights [in 6x9x-russell; & see appendix, Stubbs]
1689: Hearth Tax abolished
1689: Toleration Act [in Hutton]
1697: Blasphemy Act
1701: Act of Settlement [Glanville Williams p 137; Polanyi Origins.. 6x-9x-Russell seems to call it 'Act of Establishment'. Stubbs, appendix, says 1700]
1707: Act of Union [England with Scotland]
1712: Stamp Duty on newspapers [see e.g. Kent, 'Agony']
1713: Schism Act [in Hutton]
1728: Attorneys and Solicitors Act [PRO 112]
1735: Hardwicke Act [p 37 Kent, 'Agony..' control over church marriage cerems]
1736: [?] Act repealed penalties for Witchcraft etc
1737: Licensing Act [of theatres. E.g. in Butt's 'Fielding', OCEL]
? Royal Marriage Act [pp 226,255 in Boswell]
1753: 'Common Law Marriage' ended - acc. to poss unreliable newspaper item
1772?: 13 Geo III Act, calculating ships' tonnage [cf Capt Carter Autobiography]
1780?: Catholic Relief Act [in boxfiles 'Surrey Hills']
1780: Sunday Observance Act []
1795: Treason Act [See for Hanworth Vicar legal action]
1799-1800: Private Enclosure Act in Sunbury:
1801: Act of Union came into effect [de Paol, Divided Ulster]
1805: Eldon Judgment endowed Grammar Schools Lat,Gk only [Kirk, Woodard Schools]
1815: Robinson's Act the 'principal' Corn Law [in Harvey under Corn Laws]
1816: Lord Castlereagh's Alien Act [new powers esp political refugees; 268 Wright's notes to Nightmare Abbey]
1818: Million Act [for church building]
1819: Six Acts [p 15 in Kent, "Agony.."; she doesn't say what they were]
1826: Toll Gate Act [in -uk]
1829 Act of Parliament creates Metropolitan police force under direct control of Home Secretary (Source: a paperback)
1832: Anatomy Act [After Burke and Hare. Diaries -misc. '..repealed the law requiring every corpse to receive a Christian burial' acc. to a Mensan, who gives 1830.]
1833: Factory Act [; start of factory legislation]
1834: New Poor Law
1835: Highway Act [PRO 97]
1835: Municipal Corporations Act [destroyed all Charters/ towns independent. Called Municipal Reform Act in Devizes Official Guide]
1836: Tithe Commutation Act [apparently stopped parson taking tithes in kind; see Baker on folklore]
1837: Act legalizing registry office marriages
? Combination acts: i.e. unions. Blake etc 91a-papers/ 2x9x-ethical]
? Stamp acts [in 2x9x-ethical]
1840: Grammar School Act [See e.g. Kirk, 'Woodard Schools']
1843: Solicitors Act [PRO 112]
1844: Criminal Lunatics Act ['medical inquiry into the sanity of all condemned murderers' acc to Doug Lewis, in Mensa, a detective]
1844: Factory Act [. More factory legislation]
1845: Companies Clauses Consolidation Act [PRO 117]
1845: General Inclosure Act [PRO 95]
1845: Railway Clauses Consolidation Act [PRO 117]
1845: [Poor law]
? GREAT REFORM ACT
1846: 'The Corn Law' [sic] abolished, says Harvey
1846: Markets and Fairs Clauses Act [PRO 117]
1847: Harbours, Docks and Piers Clauses Act [PRO 117]
1847: Towns Improvement Clauses Act [PRO 117]
1848: Public Health Act [Attributed to Chadwick; see e.g. Medawar]
1850: ?Mines Act []
1851: Common Lodging House Act [see Chesney, 'Victorian Underworld']
1852: Common Law Procedure Act [Abolished 'John Doe, Richard Roe'; see OCEL]
1853: [Medical Act mentioned by Alex Comfort]
1857: Matrimonial Causes Act: transferred jurisdiction over broken marriages from Ecclesiastical courts to a secular Court for Divorce & Matrimonial Causes
1858: Matrimonial and Divorce Act [Kent, 'Agony.']
1860: 'Pure Food Law' says 'the Chemical Feast'
1862: end of a series of Company Acts now allowing Joint Stock Companies with limited liability, plus some safeguards such as some publicity for accounts and penalties for false pretences [J R Hicks] - NB Stock Exchange date after this?
1867: Second Reform Act
1870: [Act prohibited deductions from wages being made by court order]
1870 or 1871?: Education Act [5-11; in Back to Methuselah, Russell, 'Rise of Meritocracy', H G Wells on 'specially inferior teachers']
1870: Infant Life Preservation Act [See Chesney, 'Victorian Underworld']
1870: Married Women's Property Act [first of three says Kent in 'Agony..']
1871: Bank Holidays Act [see OCEL on Sir John Lubbock; who was a banker]
1871: ?Toll gates abolished?
1875: Trade Mark Act
1876: Commons Act [PRO 95]
1878: Matrimonial Causes Act: husband to support wife if aggravated assault
1882: Act for the Preservation of Ancient Monuments [see OCEL, Lubbock, Sir John]
1882: Bills of Exchange Act substitute statute law for.. common law & equity
1882: Married Women's Property Act: consolidated acts
1883: Corrupt Practices Act [voting; seems to deal with local people, but not with parties, which then 'weren't considered important' says chap on radio]
1884: [NSPCC founded to try to prevent cruelty to children]
1885: Male homosexuality criminalised [Says 'The Word' on Channel 4 TV]
1886: Guardianship of Infants Act
1891: Elementary Education made 'free'
1891: Slander of Women Act [in 'Nostalgia..']
1893: Sale of Goods Act: substituted statute law for.. common law & equity
1893: Married Women's Property Act [Kent, 'Agony..', says third]
? Alkali Acts ['pollutors' charter']
1899: Commons Act [PRO 95]
1899: School Leaving Age 12; Board of Education set up
1902: Education Act ['Balfour's Act'. In 'Rise of Meritocracy']
1903: Employment of Children Act [PRO 117]
1906: Trade Disputes Act [union immunity says p 61 of IEA 'Ideas']
1907: Deceased Wife's Sisters law repealed
1908: Company Act allowing Private Company - limited liability, max 50 shareholders and no publicity. [J R Hicks]
1909: Housing, Town Planning &c Act: inc Housing of the Working Classes [e.g. in 'Rusticus or the Future of the Countryside']
1911: Parliament Act
1911: [Poor law]
1911: National Insurance Act [p 14 of 'IDEAS' by IEA]
1913: Mental Deficiency Act [in my notes on Cyril Burt]
1913: Natives' Land Act [In 'Africa in Prose']
1914?: Licensing Act
1914 or 15: Official Secrets [e.g. 91A-papers, ]
1914: The Welsh Church Act
1915: Munitions of War Act [in 'Sabotage' by Russell Foundation]
1918: Act giving women of thirty plus vote [Russell, 'Political Ideals']

1918: Education Act [of Herbert Fisher. In 'Rise of Meritocracy']
1918: Maternal and Child Welfare Act [Says Beddoes, 'Back to Home and Duty']
1919: ?Lawlett Act or Black Act [I think, indemnity after Amritsar]
1919: Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act [in Rostand on science! & Willetts]
1920: Emergency Powers Act
1920: Government of Ireland Act
1920: Jurors (Enrolment of Women) Act
1920: Maintenance Orders Act [for children abandoned by father?]
1921: 'Geddes Axe' at about this time
1923: The Ecclesiastical Dilapidations Measure
1925: Law of Property Act: substituted statute law for.. common law & equity
1925: Guardianship of Infants Act
1925: Widows and Orphans Act
1928: Equal Franchise Act 21 yrs inc women the vote [Russell, Political Ideals]
1929: Infant Life (Preservation) Act
1925-1930: Workmen's Compensation Act
1931: Statute of Westminster: British Empire - > Commonwealth Wells Phoenix p61
1932: Rights of Way Act [PRO 97. Notices to inform passages etc aren't public]
1932: The Chancel Repairs Act
1932: Town and Country Planning Act [see CPRE stuff]
1934: Road Traffic Act [Belisha Beacons]
1935: Law Reform (Married Women and Tortfeasors) Act. Married woman as femme sole; in Rostand on science!
1935: Act [in 'A History of India', II]





1818: Report of the Committee on Prisons within the City of London
1832: Select Committee on Factory Child Labour [in ]
1832: Report of the Select Committee on Secondary Punishments
1836: Prison Inspectors' Report on Newgate Prison
1818-1837: Brougham Commission Reports; schools [Britannica & 'Woodard Schools']
1842: Report.. on an enquiry into the sanitary condition etc by Edwin Chadwick
1866: Downham Market Commission [in ]
1868: Schools Inquiry Commission
1881: Select committee on the law relating to young girls
1894; or 5?: Bryce Commission [to investigate need for secondary education]
1905: French group of the International Union of Criminal Law: "faculties of law [should have] special teaching for the whole range of penal studies"
1912: Gorell Report [on divorce]
1925: Board of Education list of 2,800+ schools condemned as defective
1925: Ninth International Prison Congress: "judicial studies should be supplemented by criminological ones"
1926: Hadow report [proposed children should be transferred, at 11 or 12]
1939: Women's Health Enquiry
1942: Beveridge report [Health, insurance, pensions, I think]

1943: Norwood report [Education: Grammar, Technical, Modern]
1944: Goodenough report into teaching hospitals. [See mags]
1946: Barlow Report on Scientific Manpower [in Rise of Meritocracy]
1949: Royal Commission on the Press [in Rose on race]

1952: Hypnotism Act, came into force April 1 1953
1956: Technical Education HMSO
1959: White Paper on Penal Policy
1961: Streatfeild Committee on the business of the criminal courts
1965: White Paper of Labour on immigration policy/ lack of it. (In Rose.)

1966: P.E.P. Report [in Rose on race]
1967: Report of the Departmental Committee on Criminal Statistics
1968: 'Make Life Better' Tory thing [in Rose on race]
1971: Compton Report [torture in Northern Ireland]
1972/3: Law Society and Lord Chancellor.. on Legal Aid and Advice
1975: [I think] Faulks Committee on damages
1976: Working Party on Judicial Training
1994: 27 Jan 1994: All-Party Report on Financial Waste &c by House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, '.. departure from standards of the last 140 years' or similar. "Devastating" - John Smith

Town and Country Planning Act 1947
British Nationalities Act 1948

Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949
Sexual Offences Act 1956
Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1958
Law Commission Act 1965
Divorce Reform Act 1969
Immigration Act 1971
Industrial Relations Act 1971
European Communities Act 1972
Guardianship Act 1973 [rights of mother same as father]
Legal Aid Act 1974 [consolidating statute]
Race Relations Act 1976 [has paragraph on 'incitement to racial hatred']



Baker 1974 Race Note that Baker commented on arrangements for tribal group reproduction; he concluded that most of these systems were in effect calculated or arranged to reproduce the gene pools of the various groups.
BAKER whether proof has been obtained by field studies that interbreeding between one form and another does in fact occur in nature. Wherever there are forms that replace one another geographically, and especially if they appear to merge into one another in the intermediate territory, they refer to the whole series of forms or races as a Formenkreis, and discard the word species altogether. The Formenkreis, then, is a set or series of races. This is a matter of considerable importance, for mankind should perhaps be regarded as constituting a Formenkreis rather than a species. Scrappy notes on my desktop searcher include: Is ‘Christianity’ part of English law? The following say yes, but in a hesitating way 41 Eliz./ 1649 Judge Jermin/ 1649 and 1657 Lord Keble/ 1676 Matthew Hale/ 1726 Raymond/ 1797 Kenyon (on bookseller of Tom Paine)/ Tenterden/ ? Erskine. ... I’d suggest the Church has always been somewhat marginal, apart from supplying careers and incomes. And also a refuge for theoreticians, oddballs, acute reasoners without sense, sentimental antiquary types, administrator/ apparatchik types. It wouldn’t surprise me if this separation was the cause of much of white creativity, precisely because is escaped the smothering blanket of e.g. Islam and Judaism. instinct: Dr. Doom April 26, 2015 You are seriously overestimating the enemy. The jews are the cancer of the Earth, but they are worthless and weak. They need others to fight because they are worthless and weak. They are nowhere near as smart as they say. Bringing Muslims to Europe to stop Nazis? How many Nazis were in Europe? These swine are just pathological is all. This isn’t a strategy involving thought at all. Its all instinct, like an ant lion or a spider. In truth there is no plan, just envy and hatred of a vastly inferior being that I would never flatter to call human. galloway as useful idiot - various quotations evidence: clinton list 'Seraphim'... It should be stressed that the first cause of this estrangement was the relentless, albeit surreptitious process of Judaizing of Christendom, which led to the false identification of the goals of Christianity with those of Judaism. The subversion of the Church in the West begins with the unholy alliance of the Bishops of Old Rome with the Franks of Pepin the Short and Charlemagne to bring down the ‘Greek-Byzantine’ New Rome. Charlemagne made the first alliance with the professed enemies of Christianity, the Muslims, to attack the New Rome. It was also the time when the Jewish influence reached its first peak in Europe. It was the opening of the gates of Europe to the hordes of Mehmet II (the literal opening, Constantinople was stormed by the Turks through a gate let intentionally opened by the Genovese) that marked the first capitulation in the face of Islam, reinforced by all the Capitulations concluded by France and England with the Ottomans, by which was inaugurated the joint exploitation of the subdued rayah, very much helped by the Jewish financiers ‘deported’ to Istanbul by the Sultans to repopulate the city, freed of its Christian population. The fall of Constantinople is even today hailed as a “liberation” from the ‘Byzantine’ oppression by the Turks in the deafening silence of the Europeans.
      Now their turn to pay the jizya is fast approaching.

    Rerevisionist's Gravatar Rerevisionist
    Cromwell, Bank of England etc (down a bit)
    https://www.big-lies.org/nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/london-ww2-blitz-st-pauls-1666-great-fire.html

    The Bank of England was established about 50 years after the Civil Wars in England. Cromwell was secretly given money (presumably gold) by Amsterdam Jews (the document proving this used to be on display in the British Museum). Cromwell had up-to-date cannon and won his war, unsurprisingly. I don’t know how much damage the Civil Wars caused; official historians tend not to mention such trifles. But conditions might not have been good for immigration. The ‘Great Fire’ may have (suggested by Jesse Waugh) been a land clearance scheme; I only realised this a few years ago. Then the Dutch monarch William in the ‘glorious Revolution’ introduced Jews — at that time Holland was a leading power, with west coast of Europe access to the Americas. The Bank of England was completed only 6 years after the ‘glorious revolution'; it must have been started soon after, I’d guess. St Paul’s was built around the same time, as a Protestant landmark. A lot of the historical mental landmarks were slipped in; for example Macaulay 150 years later praised the ‘Glorious Revolution’ in overblown language without mentioning Jews. The ‘Vicar of Bray’ did something similar.
    .
    Like ‘Bob’ I have a high opinion of Farrakhan. As well as Jews and slavery, he is good on the First World War and going to war for an extra percentage. He also is good on corruption; he correctly rejects the idea that e.g. African states are hugely corrupt COMPARED WITH the corruption caused by Jews in the rest of the world. NB he appears to be quite bulky — it struck me that maybe bowing from floor level five times a day is a callisthenic exercise.

    Seraphim's Gravatar Seraphim
    May 6, 2015 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

    While in general the Black Muslims embrace a fantasist mythology (vocally anti-christian) they have a point.
    The Jews dominated the slave trade from times immemorial.

    “With the rise of Islam large opportunities were afforded to the Jews to supply Moslem slaves to the Christian world, and Christian slaves to that of Islam; and Ibn Khordadhbeh in the ninth century describes two routes by which Jewish slave-dealers carried such slaves from West to East and from East to West (see Commerce). According to Abraham ibn Ya’?ub, Byzantine Jews regularly purchased Slavs at Prague to be sold as slaves. Louis the Fair granted charters to Jews visiting his kingdom, permitting them to possess and sell slaves, provided the latter had not been baptized; three of these charters are still extant. Agobard claimed that, notwithstanding this provision, the Jews kept Christians as slaves, citing the instance of a Christian refugee from Cordova who declared that his coreligionists were frequently sold, as he had been, to the Moors. Many, indeed, of the Spanish Jews owed their wealth to the trade in Slavonian slaves brought from Andalusia (Grätz, “Gesch.” vii.). Similarly, the Jews of Verdun, about the year 949, purchased slaves in their neighborhood and sold them in Spain (Aronius, “Regesten,” No. 127).
    @http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/13798-slave-trade

    And certainly there were not only blacks:

    “At the end of the 19th and beginning of the twentieth century, Jews were deeply involved in what was popularly called “white slavery”: international prostitution rings. “White slavery,” notes scholar Albert Lindemann, “was a concern of Jewish leaders throughout the world, who recognized it as a special problem.” Jews have also dominated the pornography and commercial sexploitation business, a trend which continues to this day...
    “Between 1880 and 1939,” notes scholar Edward Bristow, “the Jews played a conspicuous role in ‘white slavery,’ as the commercial prostitution of that era was dramatically called. Not only was this Jewish participation conspicuous, it was historically unprecedented, geographically widespread, and fraught with collective political dangers... ‘Jewish trafficking,’ says Bristow, ‘was anchored in brothel keeping, women freelanced or kept houses while their husbands procured ... Jewish traffickers also supplied Gentile-run houses’.” ...
    [An] article in the New York Times (January 11, 1998)... described the horrible situation that Slavic Gentile prostitutes face today, trapped in Israel. As the Times notes, with the collapse of the Soviet Union and a resulting economic chaos, literally hundreds of thousands of Russian and Ukrainian women have been dispersed throughout the world, most entrapped in an international prostitution trade run by the “Russian mafia.” (Although it is certainly inferred, what the Times article does not overtly mention is that a significant part of the Russian mafia is Jewish. Glenn Frankel, however, a Washington Post correspondent in Jerusalem, took the perspective in 1994 that “there was much talk about the Russian mafia muscling in [to Israel], although the police and most crime experts agreed that the brothels were almost entirely under the control of the Israeli mafia and that the Russians worked mostly as low-level managers or hookers.” ...
    “Israel has become a routine destination for the global trafficking of women,” noted Leonard Fein in a 1998 Jewish Bulletin.”
    http://www.rense.com/general32/jewsandwhiteslavery.htm

    The very name of Slave comes from the Slavs captured by the nomad tribes (Khazars, Tartars) in the territories inhabited by Slavic tribes—the ancestors of today’s Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Byelorussians, Ukrainians, and Russians, and sold on the European (Muslim Spain), North African and Oriental markets. The tradesmen were Jews, the “Radhanites (also Radanites, Arabic ??????? ar-Raðaniyya; Hebrew sing. ????? Radhani, pl. ?????? Radhanim), Jewish merchants from Spain and Southern France whose trade network covered much of Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia and parts of India and China.” (Wikipedia)


    PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
    May 6, 2015 - 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Re anon, according to revisionist historian Michael Hoffman, the commonly held belief that Jews entered England under Cromwell’s Protectorate is not true. While Cromwell did receive support from the Jews of Amsterdam and they did pressure him to grant admission to England, they were unable to do so because influential Puritans vigorously opposed anY change in the Edict of Expulsion of 1290. It was with the restoration of Charles II in 1660 that Jews filtered into England with the tacit encouragement of Charles II.
    Were the later Stuarts Jews? It is possible considering their Medici ancestors. Britain’s present “royal” family is undoubtedly heavily Jewish.


    anon's Gravatar anon
    May 6, 2015 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Bo Sears
    The puritans and pilgrims left England not because of Charles 1 but because they were such anti Christian bigots they did not want to live in a country where Christmas was celebrated. The main reason why English moved to the colonies was money and to make a better living. The Pilgrims and Jamestown settlers were sent there by venture capitalist companies that wanted to make money through the settlers.
    Tobacco and slaves were the big medium of trade; tobacco to England and slaves to America.

    Charles 1 kept the avaricious jewish usurers out of England the great puritan hero Cromwell brought jewish usurers into England and they soon took over the entire financial system.
    Oliver Cromwell was a tool of Amsterdam jewish bankers.

    js's Gravatar js
    May 6, 2015 - 3:16 pm | Permalink

    A very interesting video of Louis Farrakhan relating how he was pressured by Jewish leaders to denounce the publication, The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews, published by the Black Muslims. The book was actually researched by Jewish scholars on Jewish involvement in the slave trade to the Americas.

    Jewish leaders demand Farrakhan denounce “Secret Relationship” book

    Lolocaust's Gravatar Lolocaust
    May 6, 2015 - 3:14 pm | Permalink

    [...]twice the rate of Black women marrying Black men[...]

    I believe that should read “Black women marrying White men”.


    Rerevisionist's Gravatar Rerevisionist
    May 6, 2015 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    “I’ve heard it said that blacks growing up in northern ghettos saw only five whites —the Irish cop, the Jewish landlord, the Jewish grocer, the Jewish social worker and the Jewish teacher. The Chosen had a nice, profitable racket ministering to the poor. No wonder blacks turned on them. What did the Chosen really think —that the blacks didn’t know the Jews made money from their poverty?” — Instauration, Oct 1989. After Jews got control of the Fed, of course they could buy up any assets. Including black slums. Farrakhan seems to have a good grasp of this. Blacks do have some claim to reparations from Jews, when the Holocaust and other frauds by Jews come to be settled. Meanwhile Jews are actively promoting race war in the US by urging blacks to violence: TV clips show obviously staged events (e.g. blacks jumping on cars) along with anti-white propaganda, plus complete absence of reports of black crimes. The money supply, and the control of information, have to be targets.