Jewish Social Engineering. TV, TV News, & Movie Examples.

SOCIAL ENGINEERING TV & TV ‘NEWS’   Derren Brown | 'Public Service' Advertising– | Teaching | Navy Army | Health | 'Tells' | Missing Ads | In-house Ads | Time Team | Dragon's Den | General Knowledge | News | Ads | Housing | Red Dwarf | 'Antiques' | Recorded Applause | Perversions | Germans | Gardens & Gardening | Country File
SOCIAL ENGINEERING FILM   Hanks | Independence Day | Spielberg Private Ryan | ICA | The Intruder | Life of Brian

---

Just a few notes. Naturally, this is just a tiny subset of the sewage outfall of Anglo-Jewry media. Obviously, an enormous amount ought to be said. Perhaps sometime it will!

SOCIAL ENGINEERING TV & ‘NEWS’. 1 Feb 2018
Occasional Notes on TV in Britain

Specimen of Jewish 'Social Engineering': Derren Brown 'Sacrifice' and British TV Sacrifice (Netflix 2018). Netflix is of course a Jewish-controlled Internet media outlet, presumably translated into numerous languages mainly by voiceovers. This 'special feature' explicitly has a cast, leads listed as Megan Affonso & Bob Cable, and screenplay (claimed to be Stephen Long—no other info—with Derren Brown). Without inside knowledge it's impossible to know if Brown is basically honest, or just revealing his previously-muffled Jewish agenda, but I'd guess the latter. I note he appeared on TED, July 2019, but it's impossible to guess if this is careerism or support for propaganda. Anyway, here is part of a critical comment on Sacrifice by WotW, Way of the World, at present on Bitchute. (Removed from Youtube, nominally because of a copyright claim by AuxiliaryMode).
      Note: compare the Jewish material with supposed Christianity; in fact there was a large component of violence in the forcing of Christianity into the Mediterranean. And note the complete immersion: in Sacrifice ALL the people are actors, and behave in the same way—like the actors in the 'Asch Conformity Experiment'. (These things are always given Jewish names).

---

'Public Service' Advertising
      •   TV Teaching ads are a depressing aspect of the 'creative' 'industry' of advertising. Naturally the facts about race are kept very secret; scores on the admittedly imperfect tests of IQs are lower in Jew-forced races, and there are not even sample papers produced online, even though they could be anonymous. No prizes for guessing why this is so. We have occasional adverts (see Youtube for examples) usually with music in the background and concentration on single people, who may of course be acting. Someone must be worried, or pretending to be worried, about 'STEM' subjects (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, probably) and this is combined with an absurd emphasis on 'coloured' women, despite their complete failure to make any impression on these subjects. History is probably just as bad; looking at 'laserlearning.tv' we find a video on Senator McCarthy of painful bias. There is of course the usual Jewish insistence on drawing attention to 'racism', except for Jews, of course. Public ads include a voiceover saying 'Could you explain this?' to, presumably, a fake holocaust survivor. We have people with titles of the 'Professor of Media Interpretation' type, making a faint attempt to deconstruct films etc. It's very very sad, in its way a huge offence against children. One of these ads obtained fame by implying £65000 was a salary for the hardworking teacher, which appears to have been ridiculed. There are aspects of teaching which ought to be mentioned, though the easy money taken from you now and in future will not be in the empty vacuity of television and 'social media'. I can recall Gove, the malformed 'Jew', giving your money to some superstitious Jew outfit, tens of millions of it; Blair and his 'faith school' garbage; some white pupil with his skull smashed in a pack attack; drugs (imported by Moslems, I think); the 'need' for 30,000 teachers a year, apparently to replace some who couldn't face alien kids forced into Europe by Jews, maybe fifty different languages between them, in which none are literate. Despite mal-education, white countries have achieved things in the past, while education systems for more than a millennium concerned themselves with religious fantasies. Let's hope some deep-rooted mental courage remains.
      •   Navy, Army   Military activities in Europe are mostly run by Jews, in secret. (But I don't know how aware the 'top military' are; maybe they still worship Churchill, lust for raped German women, and have no idea about Jewish paper-money loans). Presumably propaganda ('ads') are instructed to follow some Jewish aims. I remember a few years ago Navy TV ads in Britain concentrated on a young male who had no interest in school, and was always an isolate, and of course white with a regional accent. This was at a time when Naval vessels were explicitly used to ferry nonwhites into Europe! It seems a bit odd, because military types are noted by 'human resources' types as having to be told what to do, all the time. They changed to ads showing white regionally-accented males, able to mend bikes, who therefore would be able to repair large weapons. And more ads for 'marines'. Nothing on bombing civilians, of course. Imagine the joy of the Jewish ad agencies, paid fortunes to commission this junk. And let's have some thought for Internet itself; without it, probably nobody could be sure that Jews target white countries for invasion, and give them paper money at the expense of the hosts. Without Internet information would be controlled entirely by Jews and their temporary allies, pretty much at wartime levels of censorship.
      •   Health   is I think dominated by drug ads (including side-effect pseudo-medications for people eating too little salt). Within a few years, I've noted (1) Some mass killing doctors and nurses; (2) Some unqualified people, usually from the Third World, incompetent to work; (3) Supposed doctors, not properly qualified, and criticised by whites, accused by Jews of being 'racist'—extraordinary evidence of Jewish malice and hatred; (4) Support groups of the NHS being forced to assert that their work will be unaffected by race, gender etc, even if (say) there's an issue with young people, women, or diseases, parasites, etc. Another infinitely sad issue is Jewish fact denial: for example their pretence that race doesn't exist, which is likely to lead to enormous problems. They even deny that diabetes caused by genetic inability to make insulin is different from 'diabetes' caused by badly-thought out diet.
      •   'Tells'   In the mind-reading sense are worth watching for, if you're reduced to watching this junk. An amusing type is showing deliveries made by whites, to groups of blacks, or mixed race 'families', enjoying their parasitic lifestyle—while they last. Another is the betting ads, aimed at the simplest types, one has to assume.
      •   Missing ads:   There is or was an amusing BBC video on being trained as a BBC 'expert'—you've never seen a more abject and hushed group of trainees for the supposedly prestigious positions. There are, of course, no TV job ads for (say) members of the Civil Service, or anonymous TV newswriters. Probably they are reserved for purchasers of the Jew-controlled Guardian newspapers. Another omissions is for police jobs: probably members of the public would be displeased at the non-whites only clauses, or the lack of interest in policing Moslem rape gangs. What about ads for detectives, expected to only concern themselves with whites.
      •   In-house ads:   may as well be added here. It's terribly sad to see promotion of various types of trash. I've just watched (sort of) a supposedly factual TV thing on New Orleans and its heroic types. There's a slight problem, that during a breach in the bayous (or something) there were rape threats, neglects of duty, and all the rest of it. Jews love lies and deception. There was another ad for a supposed true life crimes thing, including fakes beloved of US Jews (Manson, Sharon Tate et al)—but not real-life Jewish crimes, frauds, and the rest of it. I wonder if there will come a time when this sort of thing is illegal.

Time Team   is an apparently interesting TV thing, which has run for years, with the format of spending a holiday/ bank holiday/ vacation on an archaeological dig, often in a well-known place, with trenches, and incident tent, and no doubt sandwiches and tea. Introduced by a Jew (I heard somewhere), Tony Robinson, who used to appear in Blackadder, a bogus historical comedy, and once presented a ridiculous TV thing on Freemasons—their main site opened the doors, but of course revealed nothing. I'm told Robinson is the only voice allowed to talk to the camera, and to the various archaeologists, who seem chosen to look odd rather than competent. What worries me is that, no doubt, there is a case for censoring rare, exciting, plunderable etc discoveries. But also Jews played a disconcerting part in British history, and have no hesitation in lying and covering-up any information on any related subject. And vice versa: a ridiculous woman, I think described as a pathologist, claimed to have found a Jewish tile in a Polish forest, as a sort of informal dig. The Open University 'history' shows are full of Jew-biased fake history.

Dragon's Den   is a rather odd TV program, with a set of so-called 'dragons' listening to a presentation, typically a small group of people with a scheme. Many of these are ridiculous, some are hard to assess. What's fascinating is the implicit Jewish format: most people think of 'interest' as an arithmetic thing. It's a mistake similar to the general misunderstanding of 'usury' and just a matter of interest calculations. But in fact the reality is that Jewish policy is to aim for control, or a part of control. The (for my taste) unpleasant host has the task of getting people to give away a percentage of their embryonic outfit, not a fixed or variable interest rate. It's an analogous process to setting up shares in companies; obviously many tasks need many people to carry them out, so companies make perfect sense. The Jewish trick is to use their junk money to obtain a permanent slice. Watch the way the supposed big names have no information given about them. I noticed recently they approved of 'bitcoins', evidently a near-fraud; despite knowing nothing about the system or how it worked.

'General Knowledge'  It's extraordinary to docket the vast amount of general misinformation which Jews have been allowed to contaminate the group mind, like dumps of unfertilising toxic sludge. An example, remarkably unobvious to many, is the rubbish of the 'Bible' since translation into English four centuries back. Passing over a few centuries, in which the sludge is not so much Jewish as material censored, overseen, and procured by Jews, we now have sad material something like 'What is the name of the school Bart Simpson attended', 'Which member of Little Mix showed her ass', anagrams of football managers, trade names of Jewish companies, BBC newsreaders, slang names for manufactured enemies, and what have you. But it will pass away soon enough.

News   Now I've invented a receptacle, perhaps I'll add examples of this vast system of deception. I'm prompted by a 'news' item that Jewish graves (unspecified where etc) were desecrated despite the protection of the 'Chosen People'. I remember a Christian church in Manchester having gravestones crushed to make car parks for Muslims— but I recall no 'news' on the Jewish media.

Feb 1 2018 Advertising A recent oddity is TV ads for California, pretending that Californians live a free, outdoors, sea-and-sand lifestyle. For some reason they don't point out that many California towns are bankrupt and impossibly in debt, that the state itself is in severe financial danger, that there are encampments of illegals, mainly from south of their border, and the proportions of non-whites are dangerously high. The fact is that advertising agencies are run by Jews, who have the level of honesty established by a long supremacist irresponsible tradition. For information on, for example, Los Angeles deciding to hide 1½ million illegals, I recommend NewObserverOnline for factual information.

There were ads clearly aimed at men who feel ineducable, and correctly feel their politicians have let them down, but want to do something physical. The one I remember was aimed at the British Navy, which at the time was providing free shipping to illegals, promoted of course by Jews. Join the Navy, and Fvck Up Your Country might have been the slogan. Since there has been action against people shippers, perhaps the campaign has been halted, for the moment.
      Martin Webster protested to George Galloway, presumably descended from a name-changing Jew, that every TV advert shows racially mixed couples, especially in bedrooms. Now I see there are real or supposed concerns over obesity in schoolkids. It's impossible to tell how serious this is—some races get much fatter than others if they eat stuff their ancestors never had, and the 'Jews' controlling statistics do what they can to hide the numbers and the science. So here I have a valuable suggestion: make the 'actors' in the adverts very obese, with ugly blackish types and desperate whitish types well upholstered. And preferably subtitle adverts by Jewish advertisers with, perhaps, a 'star of David'.
      There are online sites outlining Jewish domination of advertising agencies. Jews print money, and buy agencies. A few years ago, every Christmas TV advert showed mixed-race 'couples'. It occurs to me they may have been coerced—supplies being denied, for example. or serious adverts only offered at high prices. It's the sort of thning Jews do.

House prices/ house sales low-budget TV are fillers which seem to be designed to encourage elderly white couples—or more likely actors, judging by all the evidence—to move to isolated areas where they have few if any roots. It's amusing to see people supposedly happy to shell out half a million for a small place with rather mediocre interiors. Some of the presenters manage to be polite to the ditherers, despite their endless havering. My guess is this is a sales operation for converted places which won't sell. Perhaps the idea is to speed up race replacement in cities, a long-term Jewish plan.

22 Apr 2018 Resuscitated Red Dwarf  has the original (but much older) cast. The originals had science fiction to play with, which supplied most of the content. This time they're down to obvious social engineering. The white male hologram is an obvious projection of its own—looking forward to whites as only existing in the past. There's a repeated joke about 'Cat' being handsome, which I suppose is another prop for immigration into white countries, but not Israel. ('Cat' is supposed to have evolved from a ship's cats—Jews know nothing about science). The Liverpudlian half-caste was originally meant to be amusingly relaxed—a lager lout, but of course non-white, so it's OK. It doesn't work for a plump double-chinned actor. The episode I saw (I'm assuming it's a series) interestingly showed a Hitler actor, but also a Vlad the Impaler actor, showing the Jewish desire to import Muslims to harm Europe. Not just tell lies about Germans (and Russians). Muslims have a record of invasions and thefts, including one of the biggest such mass slaughter in human history. The actor had to prostitute himself by talking about a few hundred mistakes. Quite funny to watch infantile propaganda, tailored to the level of Jewish junk.

'Antiques' on TV started (I think) with Antiques Roadshow of the BBC. Which has settled into ritual and repetition. One of the sadder TV productions; the not-very-crowded audience seem to have no idea about their own history, and be coached to pretend (say) £200 is a lot of money. The episodes have constructed local interest—phoney history of a painfully censored type—a setting of a castle slighted by Cromwell to introduce Jews, or a country house subject to a Jew swindle. The 'experts' are always shown making on-the-spot judgements, without any checks. We have Fiona Bruce, a sort of media prostitute taking time off from reading out (((BBC))) TV statements on (for example) highly-skilled Muslims, and not reading out statements on (for example) war damage in the middle east. People with (say) WW2 medals or photo souvenirs of people who died soon after; something connected with Florence Nightingale, with not the slightest grasp of the Crimean War; documents or letters or drawings without insight into their implications; country house stuff with no feeling for their activities; And of course the unintelligent emphasis on money. It's funny to see the whites mocked: a photo of three young men by a Lancaster bomber, but no photo of their deaths. How proud you should be to have the photo. (Value: nothing). The feeling of deracination is exactly counterpointed by the isolated specimen approach: it's an equivalent of antiquarians compared with historians, and metal-detectorists versus archaeologists. Or it should be,
      Antiques Road Trip presumably is derivative. It is staged and more-or-less scripted. The basis is: adverts for antique shops, then adverts for auctioneers, with some ads for villages or towns, and maybe for the old cars they drive, if these aren't just staged. And promotional material for the area of the episode: I noticed a promo for the phoney Jane Austen's house. The shop owners or operators are careful not to look at the camera crews. They accept large discounts off the 'ticket price', apparently happily. Typically discounts are about 50%. Enough to make a profit on many of the resales. The auctioneers have a variety of personal styles—gabbly; semi-secret for people they know; smiling; bid-from-me requests; oldish; youngish. The percentage charged by the auction house is never stated; the cost of motoring is ignored. There is always a competitive element, on the principle that, football may be a waste of time, but a match is exciting.

Recorded Laughter and Applause provides an indication of official seriousness. I saw a painfully embarrassing 'Queen's Birthday' thing, including Tom Jones with a band of ?south Asian drummers (why would Liz be interested? A horse on stage might have been better). And Kylie Minogue—I have a faint memory of her, in the days when 'Kylie' needed a pronunciation lesson, singing or miming about being lucky in love, before a younger, but equally moronic, queen. However the point here is there was the sound of vague and unspecific applause. The queen is given junk, as of course she deserves. But TV news doesn't yet have added whistles and screams.
      But 'news' propaganda, of Have I Got News For You type (apologies if it's now gone), does have canned applause, no doubt of necessity. It appears to have no audience, no clocks (people might notice gaps), Hislop the ageing undersized shit, and Paul Merton as the simple fellow.

Perversions - putting the J in LBGTQ (i.e. Lesbian, 'bisexual' not in the hermaphrodite sense, 'Gay' in the homosexual sense, 'Transexual' as used to suggest that clothes can change the wearer's sex, Q for Queer or 'questioning'. The push for these oddities (and the pretence the result is a 'community') is Jewish, an extension of the Jewish 'feminist' fake movement. Remember to put the 'J' into LBG etc and remember Jews and pederasty.

Germans are a long-standing object of hate by Jews, and of course Jewish control of the media keeps this limping on. ('Why does so much British comedy still rely on memories of a conflict that ended 70 years ago?' - 'Britons still can't help mentioning the war' - &c). It'll be a long time before we see repeating jokes about Soros looking in a mirror and calling himself handsome, or dramatised Jewish Jack the Ripper thrillers).
      Here are some 'comedy' references, roughly in order:-
1975 Basil Fawlty. —"Will you stop talking about the war? You started it. ... you invaded Poland." is John Cleese's dip into realpolitik
1977 Freddie Starr Hitler moustache
1982-92 Allo Allo. Pervy Nazis – Richard Gibson as Herr Otto Flick and Kim Hartman as Helga Geerhart.
1988 Alan Rickman in Die Hard; Jeremy Irons in Die Hard With a Vengeance.
1990s Harry Enfield character Jürgen the German
2007-2014 Outnumbered (BBC) - 'Gottfried the exchange student' 2009 Richard Herring, apparently a comedian; I found a piece on the Edinburgh Fringe—the place that banned Alison Chabloz
2015 The Man in the High Castle on the fantasy of German world conquest.
2015? 'Radio 4s News Quiz' Hugo Rifkind on sex molesters in Germany
2016 film, Dad's Army—not a reference to Churchill, MPs, old bankers, and pensioned-off generals.
      The (((BBC))) is now about a century old. Certainly time for Jewish instincts to surface: 'time to reflect on how utterly disgusting we were (and perhaps still are) as a nation and an empire'. '... sane, multilingual astute observers of the folly of modern Britain.'

Gardening on TV might seem remote from societal engineering. But, watching Monty Don in Gardener's World (with golden retrievers, Nellie and Nigel) I feel we're presented with a figure perfectly contented with his humble task, similar from year to year, as he pricks out little plants, prunes stems, mixes composts... a white simple worker. Someone who can be relied on to output simple messages: the climate is changing, says the simpleton. Plastic pots are a menace—but not, say, car tyres. It's curious to watch the implicit appearancism: plants must look nice, at least when grown, according to prevailing aesthetics. One gathers that, in the Middle Ages, food was grown in every available space, but the TV world doesn't mention (for example) the Permaculture idea. A garden is one of the few things in your power: it's yours, you spray it, kill stuff, plant outlandish things, put in monoculture grass, move plants around. But within socially-approved constraints. I have it from Monty Don (at a flower show) that Gardener's World gets something like 3 million viewers—much more than any other BBC2 programme, something which cheered me. He said the accompanying team is about 24 strong, half of them at an office. And that their Chelsea Flower Show TV output needs 123 people!
      May 2019: I've just watched some BBC1 and BBC2 output on Chelsea: I think every commentator talked about 'Climate Change', including 'Baroness Floella Benjamin', a 'black' woman, I believe an ex-children's TV person. With huge trees, put in place by huge machines. The sooner Jews are removed the better.
      Another socially manipulated garden type is the 'makeover', in which a plant expert, cement, rock, and timber expert, 'feature' expert co-operate on a garden for someone deserving according to Jewish principles, such as a 'disabled black lesbian'. Jostling together in the 'space' allows an electric pump water feature, a wooden gazebo, piles of geological material, turf, a few large trees and many smaller plants, perhaps a 'plant of the week', and a path with an outdoor flat area. I've never seen a TV garden with a nettle patch and buddleias, to encourage Vanessid butterflies. More likely is the thoughtless tribute: an approved soldier or injured gurkha—I recall a glowingly insincere Titchmarsh saying he'd "certainly learnt a lot" from a Gurkha.
      And we have the annual flower show: heavy trucks, bulldozers, concrete, men in hard hats and hi-viz jackets, timbers, tiling, electrically-pumped water, and what have you do the 'hard landscaping'. Spadework follows, and plants flown around, chilled, kept damp etc make up the final vision. Almost immediately to be removed. It's a sort of Potemkin Village displayed before the dim and transient eyes of royalty—what a very lovely plant; we must be going to our horses—past wonderful glorious plants (which don't like the climate and cannot last). By 2021 or 2022 a new note has crept in: the BBC promotes death, disasters, changes—but gardening is good for mental health. I'd guess this is planned to get more money from the gullible.

Countryfile is mainly concerned with money, as would be expected from the Jew-controlled BBC. I watched a rather annoying programme, with a pullovered tosser and back-up crew wondering about crime in the country (sinister music), including drug gangs targeting children (with close-ups of knives, powder etc). In Jewish tradition there is no discussion of why there should be more crime of a disgusting sort, and I'm guessing child abduction is unmentioned intentionally. The propensity of immigrants for crime is not discussed. What is discussed is the 'overspend' by councils, all of course short of cash. Jews of course love to lend money, providing they can charge interest and get it back. A figure of a few billion over a few years was mentioned. What it means is that Jews add to crime, then get paid for introducing it.

SOCIAL ENGINEERING JEWISH FILMS. From 11 Aug 2018
Occasional Notes on Jew-Controlled Films

---

'Feature films' have been more difficult, unless you're the retarded type who sees many of them, or like collecting DVDs. This short piece was sparked by a comment made by Miles Mathis, to the effect that Tom Hanks, or whatever his real name is, is likeable. I've put in links to reviews in this same page.
      Just a few notes; it surprised me that an intelligent commentator should show so little aesthetic and emotional grip. I don't know whether Hanks has been outed as a 'Jew'; his whole assemblage of fake causes is Jewish. Looking at his films, Apollo 13 is one of a series propping up NASA's fraud, or frauds—there's not much point checking his output. Saving Private Ryan of course is in the Jewish tradition of barefaced lying on the First and Second World Wars, and of course related topics. Philadelphia is about the Jewish fraud of 'AIDS', slowly being wound down and phased out. Forrest Gump seems to be a double thrust against simple white war criminals, and their use by Jews to profit from wars and control money—and indeed entire economies. I'm told his impersonation of white simpletons is convincing. I doubt if Kissinger appears. Hanks appears to have voiceovered, or something, a Ken Burns film (2007), called The War, more WW2 propaganda. This is of course important to Jews acting against whites, who have to be persuaded that entering WW2 allied with Stalin was wonderful; and but has many important side-effects, including presenting whites as viciously evil. Then we find Bridge of Spies relating to the balancing act of the 'Cold War', in which both sides were Jew-ruled. This included Spielberg and was supposedly about Gary Powers, probably a psyop to increase 'tensions', nuclear propaganda lies, and profits for Jews; and no doubt help the Jewish war effort against Vietnam. (Nominally this was about 'KGB spy Robert Abel').

Schindler's List, by the maestro of Talmudic mechanical imagery, is (I think I'm right in saying) along with a TV film Shoah the first film raising public doubts, soon to be spread by Internet, of the whole fraud; there must have been a general decision to try to keep it going, still active today.

There are endless other droppings, decorating and defacing the post-1945 world. For example Stallone's fantasies, Tarantino's anti-German fantasies, even fantasies such as The Sound of Music. The vein seems to be transmuting into low-budget enclosed stuff: Captain Corelli's Mandolin and The English Patient and The King's Speech illustrate the type of thing. Mostly these seem hinged on authors, mostly Jewish. John Fowles's The Magus, for those who remember the book, illustrates something of the process. Stanley Kubrick is another Jew tosser. His promotion in effect of NASA, the faked 'nuclear' bombs in the black-and-white sequences in Dr Strangelove, Full Metal Jacket are all transparent propaganda. [There are a few things on Kubrick, Tarkovsky, Wilder here.]

I was again quite shocked to find that Miles Mathis thinks Meryl Streep (Peters?) is a wonderful actress. He even seems to have liked Sophie's Choice. Come on...

I've just noticed some promo stuff about Peter Jackson and 'colorized' World War 1 photos, and perhaps films too, to be prepared by 2018. The samples given by the press show smiling gullible soldiers in khaki, most of them presumably killed soon after. I wonder if there'll be any scenes of death, such as the rictus-faced corpses. I'd guess probably not. And I think we can be certain that the Jew bankers behind the scenes will not be shown by Jackson.

On the subject of social engineering, lies about wars are of course not the only preoccupation of Jews. Manipulating blacks has been a Jewish concern since the 1920s, but after 1945 came to its legal peak in 1965. Somewhere here I've reviewed a film with William Shatner, on Jewish agitation for things like single black women getting paid to breed, but only if males were not around. 'Woody' Allen made many films of this sort, though I doubt most whites noticed the messages, any more than whites in Britain identified Jewish actors, Jewish concerns, and Jewish lies. Allen's films are almost a script walkthrough, bullet-point by bullet-point: teasers about drugs; Jewish immigration to the USA; German cars being efficient; 'shiksas' as special targets to be f*cked. These days, we have the absurd rubbish of 'same sex marriage'—supported by Hanks, incidentally. And of course mixed races, despite all the possibilities for social, medical, and cultural disaster. Watching Love Actually I could see all such themes, including what I take to be a race between a black and a Jew to fuck Keira Knightley, with the Jew losing—as perhaps directed by his rabbi. And homosexuality. Not (yet) child sex and forced prostitution. Many people noticed the sudden media approval of homosexuality; if I can help them understand where it comes from, I'll be pleased. The extras included an interview with Richard Curtis, a rather impassively-faced Jewish propagandist, who apparently married a descendant of Freud. He co-wrote BBC TV series, long ago, with Rowan Atkinson—British history, with, of course, Jews removed.

Independence Day 1996
Roland Emmerich as technician. The directors and actors and script barely matter   [ Back to top of page ]

---

Roland Emmerich appears in low-grade information sites as German, but I'd guess, following numerous clues, that in fact he thinks he's Jewish, and one of the ZOGdog army. (And there are several Emmerichs including from the second-world-war).

As far as I can find out making little effort, the special effects were less developed than the Lord of the Rings type, I think with models rather than computer-generated scenes and objects; but I may be wrong. The story, such as it is, may be part of the preparation for future wars, related to neo-con Jews and the earlier Iraq war of five years earlier.

The man characters are a Jew and a 'black', meaning in fact a mixed-race actor, I'd guess because full blacks aren't too bright. Jews like to pretend they are on the side of blacks; see for example online comments on the NAACP, The Jewish 'National Association for the Advancement of Colored People'. And Jewish covert support for anti-white activities in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe and South Africa.

The plot begins with 'city size' objects, what used to be called 'flying saucers', soundlessly hovering above cities. (By the end of the film they crash to earth, not on top of urban stuff, though Los Angeles and New York are reported as destroyed).

Looking in a jaundiced way at the start of the film, I wondered if what of course would be called 'aliens'—a Jewish word-change that seems to be semi-permanent—would remove Jews from the world, but, regrettably, that didn't happen.

Apart from the 'stars' there's the usual cast of crappy actors: US President, young and clueless, and supposed White House etc people, plus more crap actors in military-style costumes saluting and saying thinks like "Good job" and "You should be proud". And "Gee the good days when bombing was right."
      They don't seem to have worked out any conventions to show huge scenes of devastation on a par with a handful of crowd-pulling stars. It's a sort of hymn to bombing, shooting, and moronic violence—to which many Americans appear to respond. It's a bit like the late Roman Empire, with endless wars draining their blood and awaiting replacement as superstition displaces competence.

An interesting-ish aspect of Emmerich is his Anonymous picture. Emmerich is quoted or misquoted [Phil Semlyen in Bauer Consumer Media] with “According to Emmerich, "It's an historical thriller because it's about who will succeed Queen Elizabeth and the struggle of the people who want to have a hand in it. It's the Tudors on one side and the Cecils on the other, and in between [the two] is the Queen.” A struggle of Jews to enter Britain, pre-dating the Civil War.
      Conceivably Emmerich might film Germans being bombed and raped and starved. Go on, Roland. You know you want to.

© RW 12019-11-18

ICA? I Care? No—Ideological Content Analysis Reviews

Mostly 2012-2017 reviews of US Jewish films; about 250 of these, I estimate. The index (alphabetical) is ICA Reviews here. (Wordpress site; plenty of wasted space). I found this after seeing a comment that Icareviews was one of the most outstanding bloggers this country's ever produced. ... brilliant. ... outstanding in every way ... a good man... The reviews turn out to be mainly a list of graded categories: 'statist', 'xenophobic', 'pro-miscegenation', 'pro-gay', 'macho' or whatever. Itemised lists do away with judging the entire emotional or take-away feeling of the Jewish mass-produced artefacts, or situating them within the routine Jewish worldview checklists. Probably just ineffectual therapy against the assaults against ordinary Americans, and their use as thugs.

Review of Monty Python's film   The Life of Brian (1979)

---

I can remember seeing this film, in those days in pre-digital format, in a cinema in Golders Green, north London, where a loud forced laugh came from a Jew in the audience at the scene where Brian Cohen as a newborn was revealed to be next stable to a well-lit obviously sacred nativity scene. Monty Python was a team with a cartoonist, John Cleese, and four or five others, not very distinguishable. Some folk mythology has collected around this film: filmed in Monastir, in Tunisia; top-up funding from George Harrison, because he wanted to see the film; banned from some cinemas; interview on the BBC with two rather ludicrous characters, Muggeridge and Mervyn Stockwood, a flamboyantly dressed 'deviant' Anglican bishop. Looking back, this must have been in-house advertising by the BBC, who certainly would never devote part of a show to anyone sceptical; imagine Arthur Butz in a mock debate!

According to the routinised life, Jesus‐of course now known to be a mythical figure, but perhaps none the worse for that— was born in year 0, lifespan c 34 years. The period is not well annotated, at least in popular works, no doubt because of the mythology erected around 'Jesus' and Judaics of various types, whom I'll just call 'Jews'. Long before, the remains of Alexander's empire, described as Hellenistic, were attacked by Maccabees and Romans. Josephus' Jewish Wars (66-73) were later, and unfortunately only his writings appear to have survived; Hadrian's "tremendous massacres and counter-massacres of Jews and Europeans" later still.

During Brian's lifetime, sicarii, Jewish murderers armed with daggers, assassinated both Romans and Jews: how many there were seems impossible to guess. In 6 AD, Judea was taken over by Romans, essentially as a strip of land bounded by the Mediterranean and inland mountain. In 9 AD, three or so legions were exterminated by Arminius, in the Teutoberg Forest.

This sort of thing is obviously not well adapted to comedy. Come to think of it, perhaps uncertainty could have been made a joke. But it's surely ridiculous to show Brian Cohen as a harmless and well-meaning chap. Or crucifixion as specially horrible when strangulation was a Jewish method of execution. The Judean 'people's front' would have been in practice Rabbinical, with plans recognisably modern—killing the best 'goyim', great secrecy including language, prostitution, sex with little children, money for temporary allies, non-Jew leaders as targets, revocation of oaths, thefts of assets. A possibly deleted character with a 'thin Adolf Hitler moustache and ... German accent' shouted accusations of "racial impurity"—a black echo of the Talmud. The planning of orthodoxies and heresies, and insertions of 'circumsized Jews' into a forthcoming Church, might have been worked in, but the film had nothing on the mysteries of religions, and the oddities of Jews.

I found with aimless browsing a 1979 Jew York Slimes piece: "The Life of Brian is a vicious attack upon Judaism and the Bible and a cruel mockery of the religious feelings of Christians as well," Rabbi Abraham B. Hecht said Sunday, speaking for the Rabbinical Alliance of America." I suppose you have to laugh.

RW 2018-12-03