• Review of a Leicester University scheme. Biddiss on 'Images of Race' as part of the racism industry

Review of IMAGES OF RACE Edited by Michael D. Biddiss 1979

Just a small part of the Jewish project to construct a 'racism' industry (which of course ignores Jews completely).

For a similar book review on the construction of 'criminology' as a Jewish project, see my review of R. H. Burke's Criminological Theory

Part of a project called 'The Victorian Library' by Leicester University Press. The editor is/was part of the sub-movement by Jews to pretend 'race' doesn't exist—except for Jews. - RW 25 June 2023

The Victorian Library seems to have published 25 titles by 1979,the most unobvious perhaps being Murray's Handbook for Travellers in Switzerland, Town Swamps and Social Bridges by George Godwin, Collins' Illustrated Atlas of London, and Autobiography and Letters of Mrs Margaret Oliphant. The parameters seem to have been (1) English language, (2) Almost all in England despite the wide application of the term 'Victorian' around the world, and, perhaps above all, don't mention Jews. Hence little on banks, currency, the City of London, manufactured crashes, the foisting of wars, or the mass emigration from Russia/ Poland/ Germany/ other small countries.
The only exception is Israel Zangwill's Children of the Ghetto, intro by V D Lipman.
Disappointingly, but I suppose inevitably, there's no survey of changes and discoveries in the period. We have scraps and bits.

Michael Denis Biddiss (1842- ) seems to have had no life until Downing College, according to Wikipedia, which always suppresses such information where there's a Jewish connection. I'll assume in view of his career that he thinks himself a 'Jew'. He ended his career at Reading University, not Leicester; the book in question here was almost certainly a title to be added to a CV.
'He specialises in the history of the development of racist ideology, and the history of medicine.' This latter is a surprise to me, and I'd guess not much more than a joke. [I was right. A 2020 jointly-scribbled work was Disease & History: From ancient times to Covid-19]. Maybe someone annoyed him by talking of Jews causing poisoning and plagues. Or maybe he was regarded as an authority on phrenology. Possibly what happened was that a hack history of medicine was needed, as he was a 'historian', perhaps in the way that lawyers get appointed to head what should be serious enquiries.
Wiki says he 'has been professor of history at ... Reading since 1979 [doesn't say how many professors of history there were] since 1979 (emeritus since 2004 [i.e. retired at 62]) and was dean of letters and social sciences from 1982 to 1985. He was president of the Historical Association from 1991 to 1994.'
Anyone with a grasp of Jewish activity in the Victorian era, and indeed most recorded history, must look at this paper trail with alarm. Much of his time must have been spent directing money to worthless Jews, and denying it to serious researchers.

Images of Race (the photo is the only one I could find of this book; it suggests it made no great impact). Biddis gives an introduction, after a preface based on the Advisory Committee of 'The Victorian Library' (their caps) to reprint essays from periodicals of the period plus other things, in facsimile. This book is almost all reset in modern type.
Biddiss gives an introduction in (in my view) painfully long academese style. He managed to be vague on eugenics and to hold off reference to Auschwitz mythology almost to the end. And mentions Disraeli on race, though not in his selections. Everything, I think, with no exceptions, is in the Jewish victory in the Second World War style. All his references to race tacitly ignore Jews and their doings. So there's a hollow-centred feeling, which in fact echoes ordinary official Victorianism: the Empire is British, the Bank of England if it were mentioned would be British, the Church and its absurdities in untouched apart from maunderings by religious writers who all omit the tithes and landownership aspects of the C of E.

The chapters are:

1 ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE [1864. It's unclear whether Biddiss understood Wallace's importance)
2 FRANCIS GALTON [1865 on Hereditary Talent. Popular, not too deep; poor Galton has been, and is, a target for Jews]
3 JOHN ELLIOT CAIRNES [1865. Negro suffrage. The US Civil War, with 1000x more deaths than Morant Bay, is unanalysed by Biddiss, not surprisingly. So is the mechanical reason for abolition]
4 CHARLES MACKAY [Negrophilists piece. The sort of anti-white thing remarked on e.g. by Dickens and Russell—how could they love negros and hate white children? Without noticing that the Jews behind the movements hated both and pretended to love the slaves they wanted to abandon for steam]
5 Anon, attributed to JOHN WILLIAM JACKSON [1866. All of history vs J S Mill, whom he states to be completely of the view that all men are equal, in the sense of being equally educable. Very clear on that point. Nothing is said of John Mill, or the East India Co, but clearly both may have been Jew promotees]
6 FREDERICK WILLIAM FARRAR
7 THOMAS HUXLEY
8 KELBURNE KING [In Jewish flyover mode, Biddiss says this surgeon 'far from being an eminent Victorian', 'provincial professional man', 'served three terms as Mayor' etc wrote this Inquiry into Rise and Fall of Nations. He divides races into pure and mixed, while finding many, in Europe. And discusses mixed races producing new ingenious types, after the attempts to explain ancient Greece. In common with all these extracts there's nothing on Jews.]
9 HERBERT SPENCER
10 EDWARD AUGUSTUS FREEMAN
11 GRANT ALLEN

They are chronologically ordered 1864-1880: and from the Journal of the Anthropological Society, Macmillan's Magazine, Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Anthropological Review, Transactions of the Ethnological Society, Pall Mall Gazette, Anthropologia, Popular Science Monthly, Contemporary Review, and Fortnightly Review.
Characteristically, Biddiss says nothing about the ownership or processes of selection for publishing of these publications. Miles Mathis has done something with the Westminster review. As Hilaire Belloc pointed out later, 'The Jewish problem, present throughout history, has assumed a particular character to-day—it is the character of a sharp reaction against the old pretence that Jews were identical with the nations in which they happened to live—it first took the form of irritation only—it was suddenly exasperated in a very high degree by the Jewish revolution in Russia...' and he commented on the vast censorship (not his word) of Jewish history. For example, 'The Jews killed a quarter of a million of the people of Cyprus alone, and the Roman authorities answered with a repression which was a pitiless war.' Belloc goes on: 'The point is, that the average educated man has never been allowed to hear of them.'
Biddiss continues this long, though not great, tradition. I wonder what he's doing, in his 80s.

In my opinion, a great improvement in historical and practical understanding may result from the perception that Jews aim for maximum secrecy and censorship. And they construct elaborate schemes of pretence to hide evidence against them. Trying to understand people like Biddiss is just a part of this process, which must be applied to the whole of history and practical events.

- RW 2023