Most of My ReviewsSteven Rose: CBW. Chemical & Biological Warfare.
Its scope, implications, and future development. 1968
I've incorporated the Secrecy and Evasions of 'Jews' into what is largely a horror story
'The London Conference on CBW held under the auspices of the J. D Bernal Peace Library' says the title page. Published by George G. Harrap & Co. Ltd. (Harrap, no longer a separate publisher, is one of these publishers with a mixed range of books, some, presumably by chance, long-lasting).
The 'Conference' turns out to be about 20 people in a hotel in London for two days, plus a couple of already-published chapters, 'the first major event to be sponsored by the J. D. Bernal Peace Library, an educational trust...'
Bernal was a sort of mixed-Spanish peninsular Jews, with a Limerick interlude.
Ritchie Calder or Lord Ritchie-Calder wrote a 5-page introduction. He knew Desmond Bernal. I haven't checked his life story, but he shows all the hallmarks of 'Jewish socialism', including obscure family history, and Germans 'putting people into gas chambers', presumably allowed by Rose. He directed Political Warfare plans in the Foreign Office in WW2. He mentions atomic weapons and seems to take Hiroshima seriously; who knows whether he understood the nuclear frauds or the NASA frauds? He had abundant Professorships and published many books and had lots of publicity, also of course Jewish identification marks.
Important Note:
Bertrand Russell's Tribunal started in Stockholm, 2 May 1967.Cynics will note this was quite a long time before the ‘J D Bernal Peace Library’. Russell, Sartre, Chomsky et al. are not indexed in Rose's book. I could only find a small reference to M Birstingel and one to M F Kahn, both Jews. One has to wonder whether the other participants were happy with Rose's editorial touch. Russell was Jew-naive; he must have been caught by the large numbers he had of Jewish handlers. These seasoned lifelong Jewish liars make it hard to deconstruct what happened. For example, some Jews may have been deputed to distract away from other Jews.
Rose in his preface gives the 'clear aim' of the conference was 'primarily to help inform opinion and stimulate discussion'. In my view this was not true: it seems to have had several aims, including maintaining secrecy on Jewish power and the fact it was by then world-wide. And maintaining secrecy on the military and economic aims of Jews, including all the major wars, the Federal Reserve System, and collecting of assets around the world. And, for ordinary readers, instilling a creepy and dreadful and terrifying world-view, to keep them worried
I'll justify these claims below, but before that I shall give my revisionist account of the 20th century. Much of this may still come as a surprise to many people; so be warned.
British education since 1945. Part of this is installing Jews secretly. And part is freezing out the local 'goyim'. There is also a mixed-batch. I'll describe the mixed Jew and 'Goy' part first, as it has been around for many centuries.
Mixed Jews and 'Goyim' over many centuries. I'm referring here to the Church, both when it was Roman and when it was Protestant. Jews were tolerated, if that's the right word—military and police power enforced their 'rights', an in exchange a substantial number of hangers-on, such as Archbishops, Bishops, and Clergy, were given, out of taxes, a lifetime of housing and support, at least until retirement. The amounts presumably were calculated to make the beneficiaries unlikely to rebel. The Church is now obviously outdated, by technical advances in printing and broadcasting, and is being replaced by what are called 'universities'. These need a considerable number of helpers, just as churches did. Their quality is not very important; they're only expected to keep sceptics out.
Installing 'Jews'. I believe that 'free' education after 1945 was to allow young Jews to learn to masquerade as locals. Grammar schools were given disproportionate numbers of Jews. After a number of years, until about 1965, the system was changed to so-called 'Comprehensive' education. Most education was state-controlled, giving teachers' unions a lot of power in arranging syllabuses. They took great advantage of this.
Freezing out local 'goyim'. Was a natural result. Private, paid-for education, the so-called 'Public schools' and Jewish and related schools, must I think have had their own tax treatment. 'Public schools' have always been careful to have 'establishment' procedures, even for war criminals and the like from overseas.
Steven Rose and probably Hilary Rose illustrate the sort of thing. I'll be outspoken. Rose (b 1938?) had his first book The Chemistry of Life published in 1966 aged about 28. This is a collection of material on 'new' biological things, based on techniques such as electron microscopy. A standard Jewish technique is to copy other peoples' work, or other poples' mistakes, and get credit.
He was made a Professor at the new Open University, I believe the first professor, in 1969. This was established by Harold Wilson, a Jew-subservient Prime Minister. It never achieved much acclaim except as a careerist platform. In fact, there's a persistent flavour of mediocrity about Rose and his wife Hilary, who appears to a few years older than him. The OU is not much good, Gresham College is a City-of-London money thing, his 'brain research' was heavily criticised, including by the late Harold Hillman, and his awards are for 'communication' and similar things.
His young brother Nikolas is a 'sociologist' with credentials of the sort which are 'granted'. He seems to be more Jewish padding and evasion and waffle, as would be expected.
Hilary seems to have links with Bradford and the LSE, once home to Soros. Her mother is omitted by Wiki, usually a sign of Jewishness, since there's a Jewish superstition of matrilineal descent. I'd guess she thinks of herself as a Jew, not a 'Shiksa'.
SOCIOLOGY has a good claim to being a Jewish pseudo-science, certainly since the Jewish victory in WW2. Its pretensions can only be understood if Jews are understood. Hilary Rose's claims to 'feminism' are part of a US-based strand of Judaism, aimed at damaging family relations. There should be important parts of sociology, such as religions and military sociology, and Jewish race-based activities, and groups within which hierarchies happen, but I see no evidence Hilary Rose contributed to anything important. But who knows—maybe she'll pioneer a new genre of writing, truths about Jews. But there may be a long wait.
For the avoidance of doubt as they say, I'm not even complaining about all this, not exactly, as a certain amount of rogue activity can be expected with any biological group. Just as with the clergy in Britain, nobody expected much of Jews. Prizes and awards and mutual admiration were expected. There are lots of untalented Jews expecting prestigious positions as with Right Hons in England in about 1900.
But the policy will certainly have had the effect of excluding valuable people; under the watchful eyes of Jews and their committees, platforms are withdrawn and absurdities multiply and costs go up.
20th Century Wars. The New Views. It's now known that the Jewish 'elites' consolidated across the world as a thin layer. Jews in the USA were economically strongest after the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. Jews in the UK were firmly embedded since Cromwell. Jews in France had dominated with Freemasons and Roman Catholics. Central European Jews formed a bloc based in Poland and Russia. Jews dominated Japan increasingly since the mid-19th century. Jews had strengths in both Christianity and Islam. And (what seems to be the most recent) Jews took over China, in what was called 'communism'.
Germany after unification was the strongest economy and also the most saturated with Jews. The introduction of 'democracy' was part of the process of persuading Germans that they should have a 'Führer'.
All this was accompanied by what's now called 'media control', including books and newspapers, entertainment, radio, film, and television. These produced a monolithic 'narrative' which excluded alternatives, in accordance with Talmudic stuff on telling lies to 'goyim/Gentiles'. It all makes an astonishing story, there more so because there need to be different versions for different audiences and different languages. Much of the stuff was mostly accepted by the targets. For example the BBC pretended all along, and still does, to be honest and objective..
What was missed out from the narratives about the Second World War in particular? The entire Jewish 'elite' and their Jewish subordinates were undiscussed, as were the crypto-Jews pretending to be British or English. Freemasons forms an inferior caste, itself secret. In the 1930s a Freemason's Hall was built in London. As the US Federal Reserve system expanded, its worthless money drove out solidly-backed money, causing incidentally endless evasive debate on the 'gold standard'.
I've given a long account of Jews here, and some (not all!) of the Jews' stratagems during the Second World War. Many people don't understand that Jewish printed publications in English dominated since about 1900. Here's an account (under jewish-propaganda-uk) of Victor Gollancz, the Left Book Club, Penguin books, the Thinkers Library, Unwin, and Jewish writers. BBC Radio (invented c 1920) and later TV have a sort of mycelium of rot everywhere, and Here are many reviews and comments, mostly in Britain, on various media.
Complete Omission of Jewish War Aims is obvious to anyone familiar with Talmudic stuff.
War Aims of Jews, have always been kept very secret. These include smaller-scale stuff, such a using the Kahal system to target people and if possible take over their assets and lands permanently. And larger stuff, such a promoting wars between two other parties, typical modern practice being to land to both sides on condition that the nominal winner repays both loans. Obviously this needs the perception that they have a lot of money. As far as I know, both sides either have little idea what's happening, or collaborate to some extent.
The summit of Jewish achievement in War is to kill of as many 'goyim' as possible. Germans and Russians in WW2 exemplify this attitude; millions of both killed each other, orchestrated by Jews. If you don't understand this aspiration, you'll never understand history. Note that it's entirely possible for people nominally on one side to assist; probably some First World War deaths didn't worry the Generals.
The Roman Church illustrates collaboration; Jews controlled the Church and ensured it forced borrowers to turn to Jews; in exchange the Church got tithes and other assets, to such an extant that it was itself milked. The same sort of thing is true of the Russian Orthodox Church, and Islam.
War Techniques included extermination, rape, population movements, and making slaves. Modern versions include legal ownership, or its pretence; I believe Kerry (real name Cohen) now makes money on all land deals in Vietnam. And the forcing out of sound money by Jewish paper or digital currency.
All this sort of thing is completely ignored by Rose, despite having been brought up with a detailed idea of it all.