Crime and the Penal System

by Howard Jones B Sc (Econ), Ph D

A Stage in Jewish Intrusions into Britain. Criminology after the Second World War. What to look for!
Review by 'Rerevisionist' 21 June 2020

First published 1956, 2nd edn 1962, third edn 1965. Published by University Tutorial Press Ltd, Foxton, near Cambridge. I tracked down Howard Jones, below:–

Howard Jones, BSc (Econ), PhD, D.Litt., [1918-2007; his D Litt was in his retirement year; they may have had difficulties finding a retirement award] was Head of the Department of Social Administration at University College, Cardiff from 1969 to his retirement in 1984, and died December 31 2007, aged 89. He received a D. Litt. from the University of Wales in 1984 and became Professor Emeritus on his retirement that year.

Howard belonged to that generation of social researchers who were self-made intellectuals. He left school at 14, worked for a glass firm, local government, and estates before joining the YMCA as Deputy Warden to supervise the training of boys in farm work. In a sense, he may have been defined as a 'problem youth' himself, being a pacifist conscientious objector during WW2. In tandem with ten years in youth work, casework and residential social work, he completed a London degree as an external candidate part time, and went on to take a Diploma in Public Administration, qualify as a psychiatric social worker (training at the Tavistock, a leading edge place for psychoanalysis and group work), and do a Ph.D. under Hermann Mannheim at the LSE, all of them except the psychiatric social work part-time. This sense of commitment and of 'doing it my way' carried with him till the end of his days and it is interesting to reflect how conventional are the backgrounds of most academics (and politicians) nowadays in comparison.

Fascinating to decipher or indeed 'deconstruct' lives and influences. My copy of this book (first published 1956, when Jones was about 38) attracted my attention by several things, for example the Attenborough connection with Leicester University, and the inside jacket blurb which is clearly aimed not at prisons, but at waffle—this is the Third edition ... well established as a guide ... for workers in the correctional and social services ... for Students of Sociology ... causes and treatment of crime ... Note the publisher's name; it is a mimic of academic publishing. And Hermann Mannheim [Hermann Mannheim worked as a researcher at the London School of Economics, from 1935. Mannheim developed into an internationally leading criminologist and in 1946 he was appointed a professor] was yet another Jew at the LSE. I was surprised to read in Jones' obituary that he was a 'pacifist conscientious objector' in WW2; until of course I realised that Jews didn't fight in the Second World War—they sensibly preferred others to kill each .
He began academic life as a lecturer in social studies and then senior lecturer in sociology at Leicester 1953-65, [the present book declares him Senior Lecture in Sociology at Leicester] before moving to a Readership at Keele 1965-69, where he ... started criminology there. Then, after study leave at Berkeley, he moved to Cardiff as Professor in 1969, to head the then Department of Social Administration and School of Social Work...
I'm pretty sure Jones thought he was a Jew, though he may have been a 'crypto' hanger-on. His biog lists eight books, mostly by different publishers, though there were two Penguin paperbacks, Crime in a Changing Society (Penguin, 1965), Society against Crime: Penal Practice in Modern Britain (Penguin, 1981). Penguin of course was thoroughly Jew-promoting. I won't do a thorough review for this antiquity. But I will pick out details which inexperienced new-to-Jew people ought to know. These are in no particular order:

Never talk about Jews. This was and largely remains part of the Modus operandi of so-called Jews. The international reach and absorption into local nations, to be rather invisible, is essential to understanding 'Jews'. Changing names is part of this chameleonic process. The references list after each chapter of Jones include a high proportion of Jews, though this is never stated.
Internal hints in suspect Jews include evasion, lies, and Jewish stepping-stones and covert assistance.
Mannheim in Jones' case is a good example of a Jew, with what are recognisable as typical Jewish ideas—often Talmudic, but of course more modern in addition—given almost unnoticed influence.
Eugenics. Jones gives a chapter on this, which is incomprehensible to those who are untutored in Jewish myths. The secret is the extreme racial feeling of being 'the elect'. They don't like the idea of races and groups applying principles to try to improve themselves. And have rather frantic views on such topics.
Wars. Germans, Slavs, Ukrainians are hated by Jews, along with Romans and others touched by Jewish mythology. It is necessary to understand the absurd double standards of Jews—enthusiastic about killings, but not of themselves, and indignant when anyone points this out. (See Jew Parasite Evolution Theory for an overview).
Assessments of crimes obey Jewish policies: such judgements assume the insignificance of 'goyim', for example by freeing violent criminals from gaols if they can be used against whites; crimes by Jewish fraudsters such as embezzlement are minimised—listen for example to William Luther Pierce of the US National Alliance, in this case on fraud. Another example is sex with children three years old; another is legality of forced prostitution in Israel; another is Kosher cruelty to animals.
A more complicated example is Christianity. In my opinion, the Catholic church barred normal people from charging interest, under a pretext, the net effect being to give Jews a monopoly. The Catholic church in one historical period seems in the lead, collecting tithes and other income, while the same people may have little idea of the existence of Jews. At another time—for example now—the Church is understood by may people to be corrupt and dishonest.
Race. The link has some of my reviews on race. Newcomers must develop a feel for the reasons Jews have a compulsion to tell lies about human races. As they do about human sexuality. This sort of thing shows itself in support for immigration by Jews into white countries, but not into Israel or New York.
Jewish frauds—psychoanalysis, nuclear weapons, economics that never mentions Jewish money, Nazis, Holocaust, 9/11, slavery, Jewish origins of wars. And slogans, demonstrations, violence, and many pretences which rely on on-Jewish front men. A good example is Tony Blair.
Use of 'trigger words' or 'loaded words'. These are inserted in the manner of fashions and are more temporary than people at the time may believe. Atheist capitalist fascist communist kulak bastard nazi racist hate genocide—are a few 20th/21st century examples. 'Atheist' (I think) has lost a lot of its once-horrified implications. 'Bastard' (I think) meant a lot when legitimacy had huge legal advantages. 'Hate' is being promoted by Jews around the end of the 20th century, to blackwash people believed by Jews to have similar emotions to Jews.
As time passes, these words fall into obscurity; who for example is shocked by an accusation that someone is a 'paedo-baptist'?
Since Jewish techniques involve unintelligent shouting and screaming, watch for such words. Criminology is a subject Jews, with their group-decided bullshit, love.
Beginners need to identify mutual support methods by Jews, for example in filling job positions—Jewish teachers in New York exchange information on new teaching jobs. Jewish Academics support each other, and suppress opposition, in a way which makes US universities almost a self-contradiction.
In its way, this is more Jewish mimicry: goys praise other goys if they think they're good, or skilful, or amusing, or clever. Jews mimic this with high levels of pretend praise for the most mediocre Jews. At least when they're a minority.
Another example of mutual support is all the mass media: they use the same news sources, show the same films, support the same lies about wars, promote the same rubbish using the same words.

I can't face trudging through the 21 chapters of this book, but I do encourage people to read such books critically, and to learn to discern the habits of Jews. (Here's my chronology of Jews; I add material from time to time). It is similar to becoming interested in a strange monkey type, with secret communication methods and odd territories, and the ambition to take things from tribes of (mainly) Europeans of a different type. Your life may depend on understanding some of this!