I registered for that anti nuke lies forum, that you don't have listed here in this post, but never got an email of approval from the moderator

Steam Users' Forums > Steam Discussions > Off Topic > Are nuclear weapons real or not?
PDA
View Full Version : Are nuclear weapons real or not?

Kool Mode D
05-05-2011, 04:40 AM
I watched this video on Youtube called "Nuke Lies Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist" where he puts forward his evidence that nuclear bombs are fake.

The video points out things in the nuclear weapon tests films such as the extremely bright nuclear explosions are actually shots of the sun being zoomed in, how pictures are composites, how it’s strange that you see buildings being blown apart by the force of the bomb but it isn’t enough to shake the camera recording them amongst other reasons. What do you think about it? Are nuclear weapons real or not?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aywuM-UYySM
Snorkel
05-05-2011, 04:44 AM
Absolutely. No question.

My Grandad was in the Navy when they were doing tests at Easter Christmas Island I think it was. A bunch of his friends saw the blasts with their own eyes, and also a lot of them got cancer.
bluz74
05-05-2011, 04:44 AM
Ask the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
M249LMG
05-05-2011, 04:47 AM
I have to make this the stupidest thing I ever heard and read in my entire life, before this, was a women who doesn't believe we have gone to space and landed on the Moon.
Seth.Sekhmet
05-05-2011, 04:50 AM
OMG you are so right.

Also, nuclear power plants are a lie and thousand of little mice run around on feris-wheels and generate the power...

WAKE UP DUDE !

Nuclear technology is very real and very dangerous. The cameras that "film" those tests are either shielded or placed 100 miles away and film via zooming in.
Snorkel
05-05-2011, 04:52 AM
Suggesting the moon landings were faked is, well a whole lot less insulting because it doesn't involve mass murder, and easier to understand people thinking it because the proof isn't exactly on this planet.

The video guy probably has some psychological disorder. We should feel sorry for him and move along.
TimM
05-05-2011, 05:08 AM
Are you actually asking if nuclear bombs exist.... Christ..
crazycanuck
05-05-2011, 05:10 AM
This is a Joke right...
Europhoria
05-05-2011, 05:15 AM
Nah, they're really water bombs. The illuminati want to keep this information from us because the chance to make large amounts of energy from water (from the combination of H2 and O2 not just H2 for any smart ???? out there) would DESTROY the oil industry!!!!

Absolutely. No question.

My Grandad was in the Navy when they were doing tests at Easter Island I think it was. A bunch of his friends saw the blasts with their own eyes, and also a lot of them got cancer.

If it were on Easter Island, all those statues would have been destroyed. :S
bluz74
05-05-2011, 05:17 AM
If it were on Easter Island, all those statues would have been destroyed. :S

It was Monster Island. And that more proof right there.....without nuclear weapons we wouldn't have Godzilla.
Europhoria
05-05-2011, 05:20 AM
It was Monster Island. And that more proof right there.....without nuclear weapons we wouldn't have Godzilla.

Or your face.
Barney's_Soul
05-05-2011, 05:21 AM
They're more real then God.
chaplain_wu
05-05-2011, 05:21 AM
OMG you are so right.

Also, nuclear power plants are a lie and thousand of little mice run around on feris-wheels and generate the power...

WAKE UP DUDE !

Nuclear technology is very real and very dangerous. The cameras that "film" those tests are either shielded or placed 100 miles away and film via zooming in.

Wake up champ, he's talking about nuclear weapons...:rolleyes:
vashts1985
05-05-2011, 05:32 AM
hes totally right! there are no nuclear bombs.

we use missiles and rockets now
ShaggyDK
05-05-2011, 05:53 AM
Absolutely not real. The 150,000 to 224,000 people that died and the million others who got cancer in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was faked.
Kool Mode D
05-05-2011, 09:42 AM
I'm amazed that a person who commented on the video says the Japan tsunami was faked.
Custom333
05-05-2011, 09:45 AM
Hah. I was here before this was locked.
marie pavie
05-05-2011, 09:48 AM
Does a poke in the eye with a sharp stick hurt?
careface312
05-05-2011, 09:49 AM
Now we are all sons of ?????es
Washell
05-05-2011, 09:52 AM
I watched this video on Youtube called "Nuke Lies Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist" where he puts forward his evidence that nuclear bombs are fake.

The only evidence he puts forth is proving his ignorance of physics, photography and video.
rotNdude
05-05-2011, 09:53 AM
The dude that put this video together is somebody that has way too much time on their hands and no comprehension of what fission and fusion are all about. Of course the H-bomb explosions will look like the sun, that's how the sun works. It is a fusion process.

/removes tinfoil hat
hahaokayman
05-05-2011, 10:09 AM
Absolutely. No question.

My Grandad was in the Navy when they were doing tests at Easter Island I think it was. A bunch of his friends saw the blasts with their own eyes, and also a lot of them got cancer.

you cant directly observe nuclear detonations, someone is lying.
Naix99
05-05-2011, 10:11 AM
He's stupid to NOT believe something just because it doesn't make sens to him or he haven't seen it with his own eyes. We call it ignorance.

The only reason I don't believe in conspiracy is because there's one for every single thing on this damned planet. This case here.. the guy is obviously begging for attention and hope that his case bring him fame... i hope it brings him shame!!

Seriously...
Ihavenoidea
05-05-2011, 10:11 AM
I watched this video on Youtube...

Yea, youre probably wrong on this one.
Excygy
05-05-2011, 10:14 AM
The only reason I don't believe in conspiracy is because there's one for every single thing on this damned planet.

Seriously...

yeah i hate conspiracies too.


NAIX99....99...1999....2011-1999= 12


NAIX you are 12 years old!!!



monkeedude1212
05-05-2011, 10:16 AM
I love the internet.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 10:16 AM
lol

"do nuclear bombs exist? your immediate answer is yes, but how do you know?"

"does gabe newell exist? your immediate answer is yes, but how do you know?"
rotNdude
05-05-2011, 10:16 AM
you cant directly observe nuclear detonations, someone is lying.

Are you sure about that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Exerc ... Jangle_Dog)_002.jpg
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 10:18 AM
I don't believe in conspiracy

lol

conspiracy theories.
Baron_Fel
05-05-2011, 10:18 AM
They're more real then God.

lol thats one way of putting it.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 10:22 AM
Are you sure about that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Exerc ... Jangle_Dog)_002.jpg

it's so bright it's blinding. it's not a good idea to look straight at a nuclear detonation.

i think that is what he means.
Modiga-Disabled
05-05-2011, 10:25 AM
you cant directly observe nuclear detonations, someone is lying.

Why not?

it's so bright it's blinding. it's not a good idea to look straight at a nuclear detonation.

i think that is what he means.

Intensity is directly proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance. Stand far enough away and you can view any bright source of light.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 10:26 AM
Why not?

^^ look up. :p
Modiga-Disabled
05-05-2011, 10:26 AM
^^ look up. :p

no, you.
rotNdude
05-05-2011, 10:29 AM
it's so bright it's blinding. it's not a good idea to look straight at a nuclear detonation.

i think that is what he means.

They put on shades.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 10:30 AM
Why not?



Intensity is directly proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance. Stand far enough away and you can view any bright source of light.

how far must you stand away from the sun before you can look directly into it?
bluz74
05-05-2011, 10:31 AM
how far must you stand away from the sun before you can look directly into it?

Uranus?
damaged
05-05-2011, 10:33 AM
There's a video floating around that proves that Jesse is fake.
Pebr
05-05-2011, 10:35 AM
The sad thing is that this is just as absurd as some theories that are considered legitimate...
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 10:35 AM
just to add:

Thermal (also called blackbody) radiation is emitted by all matter. The intensity and most prevalent wavelength is a function of the temperature, both increasing as temperature increases. The intensity of thermal radiation increases very rapidly - as the fourth power of the temperature. Thus at the 60-100 million degrees C of a nuclear explosion, which is some 10,000 times hotter than the surface of the sun, the brightness (per unit area) is some 10 quadrillion (10^16) times greater! Consequently about 80% of the energy in a nuclear explosion exists as photons. At these temperatures the photons are soft x-rays with energies in the range of 10-200 KeV.

An expanding bubble of very high temperatures is thus formed called the "iso-thermal sphere". It is a sphere were everything has been heated by x-rays to a nearly uniform temperature, initially in the tens of millions of degrees. As soon as the sphere expands beyond the bomb casing it begins radiating light away through the air (unless the bomb is buried or underwater). Due to the still enormous temperatures, it is incredibly brilliant (surface brightness trillions of times more intense than the sun).

in other words, don't look directly into a nuclear blast.
damaged
05-05-2011, 10:36 AM
just to add:





on other words, don't look directly into a nuclear blast.

It's perfectly safe to stare at the sun though.
Modiga-Disabled
05-05-2011, 10:37 AM
how far must you stand away from the sun before you can look directly into it?

Including atmospheric conditions or not? At a guess I would say Mars without considering atmosphere, Venus if you are.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 10:40 AM
Including atmospheric conditions or not? At a guess I would say Mars without considering atmosphere, Venus if you are.

that wasn't the point i was making. to be close enough to see the blast, means you're too close to look directly at it.
tibetanpunk
05-05-2011, 10:42 AM
Someone didn't do so well at science in school...
Modiga-Disabled
05-05-2011, 10:44 AM
that wasn't the point i was making. to be close enough to see the blast, means you're too close to look directly at it.

I would question that statement without evidence, taking note that various detonation options were explored, such as size of the bomb and where it was detonated (under ground, on the surface, in the air, etc.)
bluz74
05-05-2011, 10:46 AM
Including atmospheric conditions or not? At a guess I would say Mars without considering atmosphere, Venus if you are.

I was so close.
DarkLite123
05-05-2011, 10:46 AM
just to add:
in other words, don't look directly into a nuclear blast.

Sorry, I can't take that seriously, it says "were" :p
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 10:47 AM
I would question that statement without evidence, taking note that various detonation options were explored, such as size of the bomb and where it was detonated (under ground, on the surface, in the air, etc.)

surface brightness trillions of times more intense than the sun

isn't that evidence enough? it's unimaginably bright.
tibetanpunk
05-05-2011, 10:49 AM
how far must you stand away from the sun before you can look directly into it?

I believe they observed from more than 40km away, with strong sunglasses/goggles.

The guy that made this video hasn't really thought this through at all...
He claims nukes don't exist because someone edited a video a certain way and perhaps used special effects to demonstrate the real world effects of a nuclear explosion...

Bizarre.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 10:53 AM
Sorry, I can't take that seriously, it says "were" :p

yeah, a typo means the whole thing is rubbish. :p
lazy6pyro
05-05-2011, 10:55 AM
I believe they observed from more than 40km away, with strong sunglasses/goggles.

The guy that made this video hasn't really thought this through at all...
He claims nukes don't exist because someone edited a video a certain way and perhaps used special effects to demonstrate the real world effects of a nuclear explosion...

Bizarre.

Let's also mention that these vids are from the late 1940s into the 50s, which is well before anything remotely close to modern special effects (both real-world and especially CGI).
Europhoria
05-05-2011, 10:58 AM
Where is notavirus.exe???!
BreenGuyLOL
05-05-2011, 11:02 AM
Yes it is real. Although i highly reccommend a Hydrogen bomb. way more powerful.
Rocketeer
05-05-2011, 11:03 AM
A little off topic, but has the nuclear winter theory been disproven?
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 11:20 AM
The bright initial flash of a nuclear weapon is the first indication of a nuclear explosion, traveling faster than the blast wave or sound wave. "A 1-megaton explosion can cause flash blindness at distances as great as 13 miles on a clear day, or 53 miles on a clear night. If the intensity is great enough, a permanent retinal burn will result."[5]

okay this gives you an idea of what it means in real world terms.
DocZ
05-05-2011, 11:32 AM
ow yeah, this guy sounds legit.....


....seriously? He sounds even dumber than that guy that did those boring ??? movie reviews... An idiot with way too much time on his hands... He didn't even grasp basic physics involved in nukes....

and right at the end... Where he sais "why don't we call WMD's nukes anymore?".... It's because nukes aren't the only WMD around... But I bet he thinks sarin and VX are also fake and made up...
Washell
05-05-2011, 11:32 AM
A little off topic, but has the nuclear winter theory been disproven?

Yes and no, as our understanding of our climate has grown, the predictions of the climate after a nuclear war have become more nuanced and detailed. There is a wide set of conditions and variables that will lead to anything from a mild global cooling to a new Ice Age.
Dwarfmal
05-05-2011, 11:36 AM
I watched this video on Youtube called "Nuke Lies Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist" where he puts forward his evidence that nuclear bombs are fake.

The video points out things in the nuclear weapon tests films such as the extremely bright nuclear explosions are actually shots of the sun being zoomed in, how pictures are composites, how it’s strange that you see buildings being blown apart by the force of the bomb but it isn’t enough to shake the camera recording them amongst other reasons. What do you think about it? Are nuclear weapons real or not?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aywuM-UYySM

Have you forgotten Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Cause that's not fake, it was very real and horrible.
mr. duck
05-05-2011, 11:41 AM
https://archure.net/liberty/nukenevada.html

I remembered a television show that had people swimming at a pool at the Sands in Las Vegas and in the backround you could see the mushroom cloud from a test. I looked for it a little but then had second thoughts about web searches with nuclear expolsions and Las Vegas.
AsheMan
05-05-2011, 11:56 AM
I'm amazed that a person who commented on the video says the Japan tsunami was faked.

They said it on Youtube so it must be fake, right?
HammerLegionary
05-05-2011, 12:07 PM
The only reason any of you believe that nukes exist is because someone told you something. How do you know that they all aren't lying? Why don't we test them anymore? Why did we only use them twice if they are so useful?
You all are sheeps for just blindly following reality, and never stopping to quest on it.

On a similiar note what ever the hell he said in this video also is true. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEILbSV_ ... ideo_title)
AsheMan
05-05-2011, 12:10 PM
blindly following reality

I'm guilty of being a realist.
iBMe
05-05-2011, 12:14 PM
What a silly video.
rotNdude
05-05-2011, 12:26 PM
Why don't we test them anymore?

It's a waste of resources.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 12:43 PM
It's a waste of resources.

tell me about it. the biggest nuclear bomb ever tested was 50 megatons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba

it was too big to ever realistically deploy. the biggest nuclear bombs ever deployed were around 25 megatons.

it's quite beautiful watching it though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfoQsZa8 ... re=related
HammerLegionary
05-05-2011, 12:55 PM
It's a waste of resources.

Then why doesn't the USA's goverment tesst millions of them?
(Sorry, I had to)
bluz74
05-05-2011, 01:08 PM
Then why doesn't the USA's goverment tesst millions of them?
(Sorry, I had to)

Because we are busy saving the world from terrorists.
(Sorry, I had to)
Washell
05-05-2011, 01:24 PM
Why don't we test them anymore?

Because we know a lot more about the effect of fallout and radioactivity on the environment and human body than we used too.
SNOWSTORM
05-05-2011, 01:46 PM
boy youtube sure is great at exposing how stupid some people really are.
Fox_McCloud
05-05-2011, 01:49 PM
tell me about it. the biggest nuclear bomb ever tested was 50 megatons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba

it was too big to ever realistically deploy. the biggest nuclear bombs ever deployed were around 25 megatons.

it's quite beautiful watching it though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfoQsZa8 ... re=related

You didn't really read it right did you. It was 100MT and reduced to 50, not 50 then reduced to 25.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 01:54 PM
You didn't really read it right did you. It was 100MT and reduced to 50, not 50 then reduced to 25.

you didn't really read it right did you? :p

it was too big to ever realistically deploy. the biggest nuclear bombs ever deployed were around 25 megatons.

de·ploy
/d?'pl??/ Show Spelled[dih-ploi] Show IPA
–verb (used with object)
1.
Military . to spread out (troops) so as to form an extended front or line.
2.
to arrange in a position of readiness, or to move strategically or appropriately: to deploy a battery of new missiles.
Fox_McCloud
05-05-2011, 02:01 PM
you didn't really read it right did you? :p


you will find that i did

the bomb was originally designed to have a yield of about 100 megatons of TNT (420 PJ); however, the bomb yield was reduced to 50 megatons

tell me about it. the biggest nuclear bomb ever tested was 50 megatons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba

it was too big to ever realistically deploy. the biggest nuclear bombs ever deployed were around 25 megatons.
it's quite beautiful watching it though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfoQsZa8 ... re=related

Way to contradict yourself also.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 02:06 PM
Way to contradict yourself also.

lol

i don't believe this. :p

they were tested, but not deployed. they were not made militarily active. they were not ready for use militarily. lol
Snorkel
05-05-2011, 02:07 PM
If it were on Easter Island, all those statues would have been destroyed. :S

Oops. I meant Christmas Island. -_-
DarkLite123
05-05-2011, 02:11 PM
The only reason any of you believe that nukes exist is because someone told you something. How do you know that they all aren't lying? Why don't we test them anymore? Why did we only use them twice if they are so useful?
You all are sheeps for just blindly following reality, and never stopping to quest on it.

On a similiar note what ever the hell he said in this video also is true. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEILbSV_ ... ideo_title)

Because the lie is far, far more unlikely and unrealistic than the truth. This is the great flaw of conspiracy theories: they invoke huge complex plots to explain even the tiniest of things.

To give an example, it's "possible" that America does not actually exist and anyone who claims to have been there is brainwashed or deluded. Is it "blindly following reality" to accept the existence of America?

tl;dr Occam's Razor.
chaplain_wu
05-05-2011, 02:13 PM
A bit OT, but what would a nuclear detonation look like in space? I doubt there'd be a mushroom cloud what with gravity and all.
Snorkel
05-05-2011, 02:13 PM
you cant directly observe nuclear detonations, someone is lying.

They were in the Royal Navy (UK), they were on a ship a long way away. And they couldn't help but observe them, haven't you heard the stories of people putting their hands in front of their eyes to shield them and actually being able to see all the bones and veins in their hands lit up?

Should be easy enough to google if you felt like it.
HammerLegionary
05-05-2011, 02:23 PM
Because the lie is far, far more unlikely and unrealistic than the truth. This is the great flaw of conspiracy theories: they invoke huge complex plots to explain even the tiniest of things.

To give an example, it's "possible" that America does not actually exist and anyone who claims to have been there is brainwashed or deluded. Is it "blindly following reality" to accept the existence of America?

tl;dr Occam's Razor.

Seeing as I live in the Americas... I am reminded of the movie DarkStar which actualy features a nuke.... Coincidence? Also your name has Dark in it.
...Conspiracies are fun.
damaged
05-05-2011, 02:23 PM
A bit OT, but what would a nuclear detonation look like in space? I doubt there'd be a mushroom cloud what with gravity and all.

A ball.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 02:24 PM
They were in the Royal Navy (UK), they were on a ship a long way away. And they couldn't help but observe them, haven't you heard the stories of people putting their hands in front of their eyes to shield them and actually being able to see all the bones and veins in their hands lit up?

Should be easy enough to google if you felt like it.

yeah, as i pointed out earlier, if you are close enough to see the blast directly, you're close enough to get flash blindness.

the flash from the 50 megaton bomb was seen from over 100 miles away from a guy who was wearing dark goggles. i believe that was at sea level, so way beyond the horizon as well.

the point he was making is it's dangerous to look directly at the blast.
Fox_McCloud
05-05-2011, 02:26 PM
lol

i don't believe this. :p

they were tested, but not deployed. they were not made militarily active. they were not ready for use militarily. lol

"I've under-estimated you."
"I'm no match for you. I admit defeat"
"Ha ha! You're not as stupid as you look!"
"I can't believe I lost to this SCUM!"

The meteo boss says it all for me.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 02:28 PM
"I've under-estimated you."
"I'm no match for you. I admit defeat"
"Ha ha! You're not as stupid as you look!"
"I can't believe I lost to this SCUM!"

The meteo boss says it all for me.

lol

yeah, i recognised you misunderstood the meaning of deploy.
Snorkel
05-05-2011, 02:29 PM
the point he was making is it's dangerous to look directly at the blast.

Yeah, well, I didn't say they looked at the blast, I said they saw it, meaning they observed visual effects from it.

And he called me or my Grandfather a liar
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 02:32 PM
Yeah, well, I didn't say they looked at the blast, I said they saw it, meaning they observed visual effects from it.

And he called me or my Grandfather a liar

lol

yeah, you can observe it in some way of course. i actually think i've seen the very same documentary you're referring to.

it was about the UK nuclear programme right?
Snorkel
05-05-2011, 02:35 PM
I've never seen a documentary on it. I heard about it from my Grandfather (who was in the UK Navy at the time of their nuclear testing program, yes).

Although I also heard about it at school, and I think there has been some stink about NZ and Aus navy personnel having health issues from the same tests and wanting compensation from the UK...not sure on the details though.
ledbelly
05-05-2011, 02:36 PM
I've never seen a documentary on it. I heard about it from my Grandfather.

okay. i've heard the very same things mentioned in a documentary.
MrChris
05-05-2011, 02:38 PM
...nuclear weapons don't exist

yeh ok, the maker of the video sure had some other interestingly titled videos as well

we should set one off to prove it, not like there was a 50 year cold war over them or anything
Fox_McCloud
05-05-2011, 02:39 PM
lol

yeah, i recognised you misunderstood the meaning of deploy.

i know what it means but i just didnt read into it much
Smertnik
05-05-2011, 02:39 PM
????ing science, how does it work?
damaged
05-05-2011, 02:40 PM
????ing science, how does it work?

It's magic!
Fox_McCloud
05-05-2011, 02:51 PM
????ing science, how does it work?

magnets, which begs the question...
stillmatic07
05-05-2011, 03:10 PM
????ing science, how does it work?

Idk I don't use science, I use conscience.


Yiffles
05-05-2011, 03:12 PM
I would believe that man didn't land on the moon before I would believe that nukes are not real.
Midnitte1
05-05-2011, 03:18 PM
Ask the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Exactly, drops this theory to being equivalent to people who think the holocaust never happened.


????ing science, how does it work?

"You cant explain that!" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BCipg71LbI)

Also, the reason it may seem like shots of the sun is because the sun itself is pretty much a nuke. hence thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen.
Ihavenoidea
05-05-2011, 03:39 PM
Idk I don't use science, I use conscience.



Umm, okay?
stillmatic07
05-05-2011, 03:54 PM
Umm, okay?

Agreed.
Derping Spree
05-05-2011, 05:10 PM
I have to make this the stupidest thing I ever heard and read in my entire life, before this, was a women who doesn't believe we have gone to space and landed on the Moon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5TWd8ySwvQ
The stupid! It burns!
Bud042
05-05-2011, 05:12 PM
Ask the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Why? We all know they were killed by meteors :rolleyes:

The nukes were a lie
DOE_JOHN88
05-05-2011, 05:43 PM
Dude, I'm just not even going to bother with the whole "nuclear weapons are fake" conspiracy.

This is a whole new level of ????ayoujustwentfullonretard
Washell
05-05-2011, 06:04 PM
For those needing antidote to witnessing the various amounts of stupidity, here (https://www.darwinawards.com/) you go.
joeylawn
05-05-2011, 06:06 PM
I watched this video on Youtube called "Nuke Lies Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist" where he puts forward his evidence that nuclear bombs are fake.

The video points out things in the nuclear weapon tests films such as the extremely bright nuclear explosions are actually shots of the sun being zoomed in, how pictures are composites, how it’s strange that you see buildings being blown apart by the force of the bomb but it isn’t enough to shake the camera recording them amongst other reasons. What do you think about it? Are nuclear weapons real or not?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aywuM-UYySM

moar Conspiracy BS. Too many people accidently Irradiated (or Purposely*) like the Japanese fishermen who were sickened by fallout from the US Castle Bravo test.

*US Army Soldiers were deployed in several military excersizes in which an Atom Bomb was detonated only several miles away from the troops. Many soldiers were exposed to fallout from the blast. I knew one gentleman who was so exposed, and he died of cancer that was most likely from the fallout, as it sometimes takes decades to succumb from the effects of radioactive fallout.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_Rock_exercises
King-Martin
05-05-2011, 06:13 PM
Nukes? They're too weak. What we need is a matter anti-matter warhead
Kool Mode D
05-06-2011, 06:09 AM
Then why doesn't the USA's goverment tesst millions of them?
(Sorry, I had to)

Nuclear testing is banned https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/top ... Ban-Treaty.
mr. duck
05-06-2011, 07:39 AM
Nuclear testing is banned https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/top ... Ban-Treaty.

The agreement was with the USSR which no longer exists. To quote a former vice president, there is no controlling authority.
Teron16
05-06-2011, 08:00 AM
I want to believee
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2011, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.