rerevisionist wrote:I'll try contacting Eyre to see if he has any comment on the genuineness - or not - of nuclear weapons.
I wouldn't bother. The man is an obvious liar, and a purveyor of psyops bullshit. Eg fake "tactical nukes" being used at Tora Bora. Also regarding chemical weapons...
"They even developed a 'black only' bomb targeting the Afro Gene and there's even talk now there may be one for the Chinese Gene".
When we put EYRE into the Avotaynu Jewish Surname search engine no prizes for guessing the result.
Peter Eyre (quoted with permission) on 'do nuclear bombs exist?' I've inserted numbers with each bit of evidence---
On the question of if nuclear weapons exist or other forms of radioactive weapons such as those that contain depleted uranium (all of which are classified as WMD's) [1] I can assure you they do exist. However as to there [sic] functionality in the technical sense or any other aspect is not for me to discuss.
[2]I have a friend who has worked in the industry who would say beyond a shadow of doubt that nuclear weapons are a reality and certainly the fallout or contamination from nuclear weapons or nuclear power stations is real and has become a very serious problem for the populations of the world that have become victim to their usage or existence.
[3] When one takes normal background readings for radiation and then takes readings of armoured vehicles that have been hit by DU for example one can see that whatever issues exist in the technical sense the problem is extremely serious and real.
[4] I myself know of people who experienced the British tests on the Monte Bello Islands (off the coast of Northwest Australia) and I myself have visited ground zero so there is no question about such tests etc etc
From my perspective I have more than enough on my plate to do what I do and cannot divert my attention from what I am doing and so in that context I will simply observe other web pages........you are more than welcome to print this email if you so wish.
I will close by giving an example as to the seriousness of using any weapons that uses uranium components......remember that in the case of DU that can be in the form of the Penetrator - A shaped charged liner or simply as Ballast (or all three).
[5] Many rounds from A10 aircraft or Apache Helicopter find themselves embedded in soft ground or earth.......some may and do even sit on the surface. When one takes a reading of normal background radiation you will get something in the region of 5-15 pulses per minute. On the other hand if one checks a spent round sitting on the surface that contains DU that reading will show around 10,000.
I have evidence that show small children playing with such rounds and some even suck on them. In another case in the Balkans a round ended up in a water tank that was used by the town for making ice.......one can see the extent of the problem and the fact that its [6] half life is 4.5 billion years.
[1] I can assure you they do exist [2]I have a friend who has worked in the industry who would say beyond a shadow of doubt that nuclear weapons are a reality [3] When one takes normal background readings for radiation and then takes readings of armoured vehicles that have been hit by DU ... the problem is extremely serious and real. [4] I myself know of people who experienced the British tests on the Monte Bello Islands ... and I myself have visited ground zero so there is no question about such tests etc etc [5] ... normal background radiation you will get something in the region of 5-15 pulses per minute. On the other hand if one checks a spent round sitting on the surface that contains DU that reading will show around 10,000. [6] half life is 4.5 billion years
He's more interested in radiation than in weapons - he's obviously never heard of the ideas of nuclear scepticism and doesn't take them into account or dispute them in any way - I don't think he's read any of this site.
The radiation issue is separate, since no doubt there are radioactive isotopes. But the half life of billions of years comment shows he doesn't have a deep knowledge of this subject - it's obviously not possible to have intense radioactivity over such a huge stretch of time. Cactusneedles thought that 'depleted uranium' itself is a hoax. It looks as though Peter Eyres doesn't know what his meters measure (nor the problems of measuring neutrons).
On the face of it, he's just another nonscientist discussing politics. He is unusual in being given air time (not of course in the 'mainstream' media) for serious comments on imperialism and Zionists, though.
I agree with you on radiation and the dangers of heavy metal isotopes. Nukes don't work but this has not stopped these scum releasing these poisons under the guise of fake nuke tests. In the large pre Trinity conventional "calibration" explosion they admit to salting the TNT stack with radioactive material and I have no doubt this was the method used to produce fallout in the the subsequent tests together with fabricated reports from government "$cientific Institutions".
Ahah Exorcist, OK. The real novelty was his explicit anti-Zionism, and equally explicit comments on regime-change and the 'west' (meaning USA, UK, France, Israel). ... it was considerably new to me, and I thought there might be a Russian connection; and he seems perfectly genuine. It may simply be that he relies on others for his science & technology, and is repeating what he's told in good faith - which may explain his considerable contempt for the NPTreaty and the IAEA, where he's noticed anomalous behaviour. However, it may well be there's a subtext which I didn't notice; could he for example be urging Iran not to be inspected, to give an excuse for war? A leaked intelligence report - is that a sign of dissidence in the USA? Is there some movement now to reshuffle the middle east - which after all was largely under the western thumb - towards Sunnis rather than Shi-ites? Is it an indirect plea to force the USA to support Israel? Listen again to that Russia Today clip - I've reposted here. (5 mins - Eyre starts after 30 seconds).
