Review of
Typical (((British))) Broadcasting Print Attempt BBC History MagazineThis review is banned by Amazon!
Litest Historical Propaganda Jan 3 2018My sample copy, September 2017, and on poking around online, says this stuff was started in 2000. Its contacts are in Northampton; the editorial seems based at the 'Immediate Media Company' in Bristol. No advertising contact appears, presumably pretending to have no ads, or having its own internal list. It has a website, historyextra.com. The cover price is £4.99.
Long-term critics of the BBC will, unfortunately, know what to expect: wall to wall propaganda (with tie-ins to BBC television productions and co-productions).
I've just noticed the BBC is doing its Jane Austen stuff, a few years after her authorship issue has been punctured. It's a clue of course as to the target audience: silly romantic women. Probably this is aimed at A-level classes, of the Lucy Worsley fan type. It's ironic that the author probably would never have written novels had she not been part of her natural society. Probably the same group who'd watch 'Victoria' and assume it's largely true. Judging by its claimed 'circulation' figures, I'd guess this is about one per history department plus one per dentists' waiting room.
I see also that another dead horse from the BBC stable advertises its next 'World Histories' title, number 5, a 'new bimonthly global history magazine', with the headline 'Has terrorism ever achieved its aims?—no doubt a series of good jokes.
The editor is, or is stated to be, Rob Attar, presumably just another 'Jew', I'd guess a reject from Spain, following his genetic inclinations. His cheery introduction mentions the tragic death of Diana, and JFK's murder. Without commenting on these, it's clear there's no place for new interpretations. Another piece, probably aimed at non-homosexual males, if any, in these classes, is 'The amazing life of a WWII Nazi hunter', who 'embarked on a campaign of violence'. Mysteriously, there is no reference to mass murder by Jews in the USSR, for example, an 'exciting story', surely, and nothing on war crimes against Germany. But there are some black and white photos of the 'Great War' with discreet silences about its financing. There's a piece, possibly interesting, on 'Medieval Europe's unholiest holy man', with of course no sign of legal, landowning, suppression of unbelievers, and other aspects of churches—a potentially fascinating and interwoven set of power structures, not of course detailed here. There's a 'cover feature' on 'five forgotten' Viking battles which 'sealed the fate of the Anglo-Saxons'. I'd have thought their fate was sealed by William the Conqueror (and his Jews). But no need to trouble with that. I see a piece by 'Clair Wills [who] teaches at Princeton University' advertising her book: '... as displaced European refugees and economic migrants arrived to fill in the gaps in the workforce'. Well, that's one way to put it, handily omitting facts about poor exhausted Britain. Flicking through more, we find poor old Nick Hewer, exhausted from watching young people try to sell ice-creams etc, a 'TV Presenter', presenting nonsense about Primo Levi. I don't think there's a single page presenting any issue accurately. Imagine the shiksas (Jew word, meaning whore, for white women) having to work to apply their history 'degrees' or journalism 'degrees'.
This is trash, of course, wearisome rubbish. Let's hope the BBC is displaced by honest people, or eradicated. If you must buy it, and I hope you don't, at least get a 100% discount.
A later edition: 'exciting' piece by third-rate 'academic' on messages between Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin. As is invariable with Jews, it is assumed that war against Germany was desirable—the facts about Jewish mass murders in the USSR (and Ukraine and China and other places to be revealed) are of course ignored. The more plausible explanation, that Jews worldwide, including the 'German' NSDAP, were in the business of maximising non-Jew deaths, is of course not part of Attar's disgusting routinised lies.
Another irritating piece was by someone called Max Hastings, of min intellect, mentioning in passing that (((American))) genocide in Vietnam may have been a bit difficult for the Vietnamese. Readers might look at Bertrand Russell on Vietnam inlcluding my comments on the fifty years that have elapsed, Russell unfortunately being Jew-naive. And a link to his book.