Review of Bertrand Russell Bertrand Russell: War Crimes in Vietnam
Vietnam—some of the (very repellent) truth by a very skilful writer, October 18, 2010
Download War Crimes in Vietnam here pdf format. c 50MB. More revisionist material (on Vietnam; in file on Jews) here
Click for Russell's informative introductory essay, outlining the steps of world history leading to the American invasion. Bear in mind his comments need revision to include Jewish information.
Collection of essays, rather than one continuous book, published in 1967 when Russell, the philosopher, was in his 90s. The magisterial introductory essay looks at the French conquest, the First World War, Ho Chi Minh and others in Paris, the Second World War including Japan, and Dien Bien Phu where the French were decisively defeated. After this the Americans took over, though of course the period was dominated politically in the USA by Jews, notably Kissinger.
Four stars because several issues are, understandably really, played down: the influence of Catholicism—a tiny layer of converts in countries conquered by France became the new 'elite'. The influence of Jews of course is ignored—a 20th century convention. There is little on 'imperialism'—control of finance is omitted, and there isn't much detail on raw materials and markets. And the money-making aspect of war—war profiteers, the 'warbucks' aspect—isn't spotlit.
This book preceded Russell's War Crimes Tribunal, published under the media-crit but not search-friendly title 'Prevent the Crime of Silence'.
Very disgusting stuff; I think this is what led Robert Faurisson to say the USAF killed more children than any other organisation. Note incidentally the part played by the 'Holocaust' fraud—US commentators could say, well, in comparison with the Holocaust, this wasn't much—only a few million dead.
[1] The 'war' was probably a Jewish money-making opportunity—building bases, spending on ships and aircraft (including helicopters) and endless shells and bombs. Maybe there was experimentation, though personally I'd guess this is largely a myth; these things could be tested elsewhere.The US paperback has a strange paste-up cover, with what looks a bit like a Filipina and a young black rather crudely cut-and-pasted. Jewish racism, no doubt. Don't ask me!
With Jews controlling the USA, Europe, and USSR, China must have been a tempting next target. One of Russell's essays mentions McNamara trial ballooning Chinese weapons in Vietnam as a cause for war—almost unbelievable hypocrisy. Maybe a motive was to provoke war with China; who knows? The myth of H bombs may have allowed that option to be suppressed. Maybe it was a militarist vs banker struggle?
About five years after this book, Chomsky's Backroom Boys appeared, the rather mild comment of which in retrospect seems like an apologia for Kissinger and other establishment war criminals. In fact it may not be too much to say that Chomsky's job was to minimise the secret acts of Jewish war criminals.