Ward Wilson, Monterey Institute & Middlebury Institute: Exit Strategy from the Nuclear Weapon Fraud - The Pretence of Analysis

'Rethinking nuclear weapons' - discreet lies - covert policy reversals - managed nuclear closedowns - payoffs

Ward Wilson, Monterey Institute: Exit Strategy of Nuke Fraud

Postby rerevisionist » 13 Sep 2011 00:59

Trying to Discreetly Phase Out Nuke Bomb Frauds: Ward Wilson

'Rethinking Nuclear Weapons'

Trying to sidestep fraud quietly, without being noticed: Ward Wilson's 'Four myths about nuclear weapons - Hiroshima - H-Bomb - Deterrence - Usefulness'


Ward Wilson's twist-the-truth video - Nov. 2008 at the 'Monterey Institute', Princeton

Image

This is a 48-minute Youtube of the 'expert' Ward Wilson, filmed from the front of what looks like a lecture room of the Monterey Institute. Powerpoint-style graphics are displayed behind him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bB9_hsETP4 Click here to watch Ward Wilson do his routine.

Interesting because it's an attempt to phase out 'nuclear weapons' without admitting the huge fraud. Obviously, the traditional view - that an H Bomb will wipe out a huge area and irradiate it too - has to be removed, if possible, but without stating that the whole idea was a fraud. Also of course US genocidal policy, and support for Jewish policy, must not be mentioned. Tricky, and indeed we see classic symptoms of nervousness - the speaker has the body language of a salesman pushing a weak product; along with evasions, weak analogies, timing problems, feeble jokes.

The 'Monterey Institute' Youtube site has many videos; the blurb to this one says fairly accurately:-
He argues that the Japanese did not surrender because of the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since nuclear deterrence relies on the threat of city destruction and city destruction is an ineffective way to wage war, he calls the efficacy of nuclear deterrence into question.

His four myths are supposed to be Hiroshima, H-Bomb, Deterrence, and Usefulness, but in practice Wilson doesn't follow this sequence. From our viewpoint, this isn't surprising; however we can use it as a rough outline to put some order into his shambling nonsense.

Paradigm shift. He's talking of public perception - he knows this is a P.R. exercise in lies. ".. It's something you're gonna have to help build.. the outsize tool problem.." There's introductory stuff like a well-known optical illusion, supposedly representing a paradigm shift; and the 'Apocalypse paradigm', backed by Oppenheimer, Baruch, and other usual suspects. What can he do with this? Well...

H-Bomb
His problem: to pretend that an H-Bomb, if it existed, wouldn't be effective.
His solution: to claim that destroying cities has not usually won wars in the past. And also to scale down the dangers that H-Bombs (if they existed) would pose.
Watch for: in the past, destroying cities was difficult; but with an H-bomb, the whole thing could be simply wiped out - so historical examples are irrelevant. And watch for homely, tame, irrelevant comparisons.

"It turns out cities have been destroyed in wars for thousands of years" - he doesn't go into the issue of what a 'city' is (one he mentions had 30,000 inhabitants) or what 'destroyed' meant - not surprisingly, since an H-Bomb as promoted would destroy far more effectively than any pre-technology war. He gives fake analogies - Atilla, Genghis Khan, Richmond Va, and Coventry and London. (Wilson doesn't seem aware that by comparison with German and Japanese towns, the damage to these was pretty negligible). There's a long, long section on this - following the inverse law of length and implausibility - and it's all complete rubbish, since H-Bombs, if they existed, could delete whole territories.

Deterrence
Wilson points out correctly that there have been a lot of wars since 1945 - though he says nothing on their aims, methods, results, or morality. Obviously this is to be expected from a funded hack! What he says is deconstructed on our site. For example, why weren't the 'Soviets' (read: Jews running Russia and eastern Europe) intimidated by the supposed US monopoly in nuclear weapons? Wilson doesn't follow this argument through; clearly, if the weapons had existed, they could have been used, and his paymasters will be assured that the real reasons will not be given. Wilson pretends that this proves deterrence in effect does work - but not against ordinary wars.

Wilson introduces a phrase: 'nuclear exceptionalism' apparently taken from Herman Kahn. Nuclear weapons are so awesome and dangerous, so powerful and different, that people can't reason about them (apart from Herman Kahn).

Hiroshima
Wilson's 'myth of Hiroshima' is the entirely correct view that the Japanese didn't surrender because Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed. The fact they were desperate to surrender is not known to Wilson, who however gives a very, very long dull account of Japanese attitudes near the end of the war, including their attitude to Stalin and alleged slowness in coming to a decision, and what must be nonsense about the International Date Line. I doubt whether any of it is accurate, notably the surrender manoeuvres, but it fills Wilson's time. However, what he doesn't dispute is the traditional lie that atomic bombs were used. But he takes advantage of the relatively limited damage to the two cities by pretending it would apply also to H-Bombs.

Usefulness
Having done his best to establish that destroying cities doesn't work (assuming the destruction is conventional!), and that the atom bombs supposedly used didn't cause surrender (but suppose they'd been used at the start?), Wilson now has to claim such bombs are useless. His object is to ban them but keep conventional arms - he praises the US forces without even the slightest idea of whether they are sustainable, or what they've been used for.

Wilson's technique here is amusingly stupid. He uses his homely comparison method, comparing H-Bombs to sledgehammers, a stick of dynamite, the 'Spruce Goose' flying boat, and the problem of parking big cars. He also says MIRVs needed small bombs, and in any case claims the nuclear arsenal's bombs 'have been getting smaller', presumably contravening the laws of physics.

Conclusion
There's routine stuff about terror and the Vietnam War - Wilson seems to love genocide - and the well-known fake mushroom cloud photo. He does insert one significant, barely-noticeable remark - there are "doubts about reliability", something he failed to mention before. And he says nuclear weapons have cost about $5.5 trillion - I don't know if he tried to adjust for inflation.

_______________________
This must I imagine be typical of a funded 'think-tank' required to output official garbage. And I've just found this incredible story:

The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has awarded a $392,000 grant to Princeton-based nuclear weapons policy analyst and award-winning writer Ward Wilson.
. . .The grant supports Wilson's ground-breaking research and writing on the changing nature of the international debate about nuclear weapons and on the "new realism" about nuclear weapons: emerging notions that they are costly, dangerous, but not very useful. These new, pragmatic arguments undermine the rationale for keeping these dangerous weapons while at the same time breaking with the deadlocked debates of the past.

______________________
I note the British 'Pugwash' Group (in business more than 50 years) is in on this.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Phasing out Nuke Fraud? - Ward Wilson of the Monterey Institute and the Pretence of Careful Analysis

Postby NUKELIES » 13 Sep 2011 07:15

EXCELLENT post Rerevisionist. They're scrambling to spin the unspinnable former ultimatum: nukes either exist or they don't. The "phasing out," as you aptly put it, requires implementation of a new gray area which had formerly been staunchly black-and-white.
However, the morbid gullibility of the craven masses lends itself to the success of the Liars That Be. A majority of people still believe the "Official" 9/11 story after having been exposed to ten years of truth telling on the internet. Nuclear/atomic bombs are an abstract, dated subject which must only appeal to certain demographics. Time and history will tell, but I suspect that acceptance of the non-existence of nuclear bombs will gradually seep into the mass consciousness without any sudden mass revelations taking place. At some point the fake moon landing and the non-existence of nuclear bombs will be standard, but anecdotal footnotes in the canon.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: Phasing out Nuke Fraud? - Ward Wilson of Monterey Institute

Postby rerevisionist » 13 Sep 2011 12:13

Thanks for your kind words! I'm inclined to agree - the passage of time deletes many issues from the minds of most; and this could well be one of them. But there are forces acting the other way - what about duped third-world countries, for example; or people who wanted genuine defence, but got only a fantasy substitute, such as white Americans?

(NB just a note - I'm impressed with Google; only 12 hours after I put this piece up, it is spidered and indexed - Googling 'Ward Wilson Monterey' lists this as 4th. Maybe someone's trying to get him sacked! Anyway I changed the title slightly so that Googlers have an idea what they're getting).

I just noticed that the Norwegian Government is paying these phonies a few hundred thousand dollars. I wonder if they get some payback? These days who knows. There's certainly little love lost between the ZOG administrators of the USA and Norway-
Norway Utoya Island shooting - Israel hate against Norway https://nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/Norway-Utoya-Island-Breivik-Israel-hate-1-of-2.html
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Phasing out Nuke Fraud? - Ward Wilson of Monterey Institute

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 14 Sep 2011 01:21

They also seem to be phasing out nuclear power plants around the world. Apparently replacing them with the fake wind farms.
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Re: Phasing out Nuke Fraud? - Ward Wilson of Monterey Institute

Postby NUKELIES » 17 Sep 2011 09:36

FirstClassSkeptic wrote:They also seem to be phasing out nuclear power plants around the world. Apparently replacing them with the fake wind farms.


Lol! That about sums it up.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: Trying to Phase Out Nuke Bomb Fraud - Ward Wilson, Monterey Institute

Postby rerevisionist » 30 Sep 2011 14:35

I've been following up the Norway link. This is what a Ward Hayes Wilson site says --
In February 2010, Wilson was awarded a $392,000 grant by the Foreign Ministry of Norway in support of basic research, writing, and speaking. The grant will be administered by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS) at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. Wilson is a Senior Fellow at CNS. He also directs the Rethinking Nuclear Weapons project.


Wilson
has been asked to embark on a speaking tour of nations that are considering building nuclear weapons in order to present views about the usefulness of nuclear weapons based on recent scholarship about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Tentative stops include Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Japan and South Korea. He will also be speaking in the United States, trying to encourage new thinking about nuclear weapons.


I looked at the Norwegian government's website https://www.regjeringen.no and searched for James Martin, Ward Wilson, Monterey Institute, and CNS, but could find no mention of it whatsoever, which was a bit disappointing, as I thought our site might apply for money, too. By government standards of course their grant is peanuts - they must make many of these grants every year. I searched for 'nuclear' and found the usual sort of stuff - Nuclear Threat Initiative, the Hoover Institution, Nuclear Suppliers Group, nuclear terrorism, nuclear submarines, nuclear waste, nuclear proliferation, nuclear safety, nuclear disaster, an 'environmental plan of action', the Norwegian Atlantic Committee, NATO, Iran, Korea, the NPT, Hiroshima and Nagasaki - all the usual, plus an address by King Harald V. But no mention of the Monterey Institute or Ward Wilson. I remain a bit puzzled, and even wonder if the grant had been an invention, or if it was made in an unserious way.

Anyway, translating the Norwegian website (from Norwegian Nynorsk - there are two written forms of Norwegian, and ny = new [alphabet]), we find the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Utanriksdepartementet) is headed by a multimillionaire, Utanriksminister Jonas Gahr Støre. They clearly have adopted all the nonsense about asylum seekers, 'Roma', Jews, Muslims, and all the rest - climate change, for example. So it seems unlikely they'd welcome an icy blast of reason. However, if I can work out how to contact their bureaucracies, I will submit an application in machine-translated Nynorsk.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Trying to Discreetly Phase Out Nuke Bomb Frauds: Ward Wilson

Postby rerevisionist » 11 Oct 2011 18:26

Thanks to RealityWall, I've found another member of this phoney phase-out-nukes-as-they're-outdated genre.
https://nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/richard-rhodes-hack-nuke-books.html is the link on this forum. Here's part of that thread:---

https://fora.tv/2010/09/21/Richard_Rhodes_Twilight_of_the_Bombs#fullprogram

This is on 'Fora TV' and is titled 'The Twilight of the Bombs'. It's about 100 minutes. An organization called 'The Long Now Foundation' seems to be run by, or associated with, Richard Rhodes.

The whole presentation is similar to that of Ward Wilson. Perhaps a whole set of foundations, trusts, 'research' organizations, think tanks etc is in the process of trying to defuse and phase out the nuclear fraud.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Trying to Discreetly Phase Out Nuke Bomb Frauds: Ward Wi

Postby rerevisionist » 31 Oct 2011 13:51

On the 'Rethinking Nuclear Weapons' site is a list of seminars, talks etc--
https://wardhayeswilson.squarespace.com/previouspresentations

Bit hard to interpret; they all seem too low key, to me. Is the idea to influence journalists? Or maybe educators? They are mostly not open to the public (I assume 'even' means event!)
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Ward Wilson, Monterey Institute: Exit Strategy of Nuclear Weapons Fraud

Postby Sorensen731 » 08 Dec 2011 13:59

Nukes are pressure towards world government, and new age. The next evolution of Marxism.
Nukes could be sacrificed as a gift, citizens happy, the fraud-hoax under the carpet while still keeping the terrorism cart.
User avatar
Sorensen731
 
Posts: 87
Joined: 24 May 2011 14:37


Return to Nuke Scams Future: Covert Exit Strategies & Secret Plans to Phase Out Nuke Frauds


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest