[rerevisionist]

Cecil Roth's 1938 book - Judaic Mythmaking: the Claimed Jewish Contributions to Civilization.

I have a copy of this slim volume (the 1943 'pocket edition', published 'under the auspices of the Leeds Lodge of B'Nai B'rith'). The preface says it was first published in February 1938 - obviously a sensitive time, of course. It was adapted for America - there's at least one online downloadable version (the following link is the 1940 US edition; but the plain text version is full of scanner errors)----
https://www.archive.org/details/jewishcontributi00roth

The bibliography is largely European-language books specifically on 'Jews' in for example Venice and Majorca, and by activity - letters, or the arts, or the 'economic sphere'. The science chapter is the shortest in the book. There's biographical material on quite a few obscure individuals. I suspect from the general layout and development that much of the book is simply taken from encyclopedias. There's almost nothing on e.g. Sachs, Baruch, the Flexners, Trotsky, Beria, Kamenev etc. The Rothschilds get the sort of treatment to be expected. It's a slim volume and rather laughable - e.g. 'England produced only one Shakespeare' but there are several Jewish scholars! There are inventions such as the motor boat. I recommend it to people who are critically-minded to try to genuinely assess 'Jews'. The overwhelming impression is that the alleged achievements are largely bullshit; it's worth a look for the most absurdly childish and self-adulatory tribal material, a bit like a family with a pronounced criminal history saying how much they always loved collecting art. The 'Nobel Prize' story is part of the mythology, these 'prizes' having been given out for a strange mixture of work, some of it fraudulent, such as Katz's. I would advise people not to take Nobel Prizes at all seriously.

Another issue is patents: Iit's typically stated that Israel puts in the most patent applications, and invent new things constantly. But - patents are expensive. Ownership of property rights is a financial matter - many inventors work for corporations who take over patent rights. It hadn't occurred to me before that Einstein supposedly being a patent clerk, and industrial spying and the well-known covert explanations to Jews of US military matters, may be part of the same syndrome.

The whole system has been funded in effect by frauds, notably at present getting a percentage from paper money, and a lot of percentages from legal ownership of mineral wealth obtained by the paper money route. There's of course the 'Holocaust' fraud. And also science frauds - NASA, relativity, nuclear bombs, 9/11 in its demolition element, AIDS, and a lot of other medical matters, mostly as far as I know hinging on exploitation of cell biology errors. Investigation of scientific fraud is in its infancy, unfortunately; Kevin MacDonald for example doesn't begin to look at it.



(Roth's book more than slightly resembles the 'black inventions' mythologies that are out there. See this debuking site about black invention myths
https://www3.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/)

[rerevisionist]

This is NUKELIES discussing Catholic Confessions as a possible data-gathering exercise. It perhaps belongs here (or with his personal statement on the 'Holocaust')---

By the way, I'd like to qualify one thing: My neutral stance on Judaism is in no way a naive stance - it is from extensive lifelong exposure to Judah. I simply do not believe that they have the power that is ascribed to them, regardless of any possible conspiracy. And to be honest, if you remove fear of the Jews from the equation, there's plenty to be fascinated by about Jews and Judaism - or even like about them. Look at how they have commanded the attention of the entire world for millennia - even China! If you were a God looking down on the planet who would you like best?

By 'extensive lifelong exposure to Judah' I take it NL means New York Jews - i.e. something like one third of all the people at present claiming to be 'Jews'.

The first point is the 'power ascribed to them'. In my view, there is no question that they have this power. How it's distributed among them is another issue; but the general effect seems unquestionable to me. Today, I went to a shopping centre typical of those throughout Britain, and the USA, and ANZ, and Europe. The bookshop has not one single book on the truth about the 'Holocaust' or US war crimes in Vietnam, or the economics of paper money. Or of course NASA, nukes, Pearl Harbor, 9/11, secret organisations, dumbing-down of education, and innumerable related topics: US government, Jews and Iraq, the Liberty.... The censorship is complete. A newspaper headline said something about a footballer being sacked because of a 'Holocaust' remark. This is of course just one a long series. The entire film/TV industry is saturated with Jewish influence. All this is simply not possible without enormous power.

The second point is perception of other people. Personally, I'm rather naive here. If I walk round a suburb, I wonder what the residents do - I don't have an accurate perception of the work of most of these people. Many of them are part of franchises or government departments and have almost no discretionary activity - they are told what to do and even the most skilled are just doing what they are told, but well. When I meet or see someone, I usually (I've found) credit them with far more knowledge than they in fact have. I'm inclined to think they are decent, sensible, rational. This is with full adult perception: perception in the full psychological sense, not just of perceiving the shape and position of things, but whole masses of associations - how the things are made, how they will decay, how they got there, how they change in appearance with lighting....

Presumably, peoples' perceptions, in the full psychological sense, of each other, differ, possibly a great deal. I suspect the Jewish attitude really is that goyim are stupid and worthless, and in fact that's a fairly accurate defensible view. A lot of blacks view, or used to view, whites as all being influential and wealthy. Some people (I remember being told, by a founder of Mensa) can tell who the important people are, in any room which they happen to be in. Some people (Derren Brown seems to be this type) take other people very seriously, and are very careful to assess and 'appreciate' them. So when NUKELIES states he simply doesn't believe they [Jews] have the power ascribed to them it must be an error or weakness in his perceptions.

[rerevisionist]

From an anonymous writer:

... the banal answer is that the impact of Jews on Russia was rather disastrous. There is a list of people who returned in "sealed train" with Lenin from Germany in 1917 (computer translated):

https://translate.google.ru/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.redrat.ru%2F%25D0%25B4%25D0%25BE%25D0%25BA%3A%25D1%2581%25D0%25BF%25D0%25B8%25D1%2581%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B8_%25D0%25BF%25D1%2580%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B5%25D1%2585%25D0%25B0%25D0%25B2%25D1%2588%25D0%25B8%25D1%2585_%25D0%25B2%25D0%25BE_%25D0%25B2%25D1%2580%25D0%25B5%25D0%25BC%25D1%258F_%25D0%25B2%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B9%25D0%25BD%25D1%258B

The overwhelming majority of them were jews, of course. The pale of settlement was abolished by the Provisional Government decree in the same year. So nothing could stop the dramatic infiltration. That was really a jewish assault on Russia as N.Markov https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Yevgenyevich_Markov put it in his essay.

Many were wiped out under Stalin, but the ruling culture was allready transformed. In the so-alled patriotic discourse of the 1990s the late Stalin's policy was typically evaluated as even antisemitic. See the doctor's plot, for instance. But it's curious that his surname is sometimes erroneously(?) translated as "Juga-shvili" (son of a Jew).

One can assume that the pressure of jews was so great that Stalin was forced to create the jewish autonomy in the far east to slow down it.

[rerevisionist]

Interesting development is new dictionary-type websites based on wikipedia-type format. In effect, they are electronic versions of what were alphabetical encyclopedias, with the content donated, and also edited by a team under the control of the site owners.

This is 'Metapedia' which describes itself as a pro-European site (and is in numerous languages- this is is the front page of the English-language section:
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page