[NUKELIES]

The collective power of the Jewish people is not unlimited. World domination by the Jews is therefore impossible.

Power-wielders - Jewish and non-Jewish - know this and use it to their advantage. "Anti-semitism" and scapegoatism are two sides of the same coin.

[rerevisionist]

I partly agree with you. It is important to try to quantify Jewish influence. People who discuss the Fed etc don't ever seem to manage this task; which admittedly is difficult, because the evidence is so difficult to collect. And it can't possibly be infinite. However, because of rather fixed human physical needs, and also limited abilities and skills, this doesn't mean some clique can't dominate. There have been landed aristocracies, theocracies, monarchies, armed groups, land and sea empires and what have you. Somehow, I think through pragmatism rather than some theoretical grasp, some groups have managed to arrange things so that it was very difficult to stand up to them; probably they simply reacted with various forms of oppression, in the way governments at war automatically lie - anything that worries them is censored. And with control, so that the lower orders competed with each other. They seem to have an almost instinctive grasp of human hierarchies - maybe they can spot important people and play with loyalties. My guess and hope is that the 'Jewish' cliques' time is drawing to a close, much as some other groups weakened.

There doesn't seem to be any impossibility in world domination, though - older people will always rule juveniles; in the animal kingdom, lions (arguably) always dominate wildebeeste; the Hindu caste system is (perhaps) the most durable form of society yet seen. If the 'Jewish' plans for immigration and miscegenation are fulfilled, I don't see any impossibility in a permanent serf population.

NB a 'scapegoat' is an animal supposedly loaded up with sins, and then driven away, taking 'sins' away with it. I don't see a parallel at all. 'Jews' are blamed, correctly, for mass murder in the USSR, assorted wars, huge frauds such as the 'Holocaust' and vast financial frauds, science frauds, corrupt mass media and so on. Unless you can show that other groups per head have a worse record, these sins are correctly attributed to them! And even if other groups did exactly the same, there would still be a case for diminishing their power.

[NUKELIES]

a permanent serf population

I suppose that is our deepest fear. It seems inevitable that human beings are going to be racially mixed beyond recognition in the not too far-off future as they already are in Brazil and it's beginning to look like that in the U.S. already - and plenty of it in London, Paris, etc., as well. 'Multi-racial' has replaced 'mixed' in the States as far as I'm aware.

There was a South Park episode showing a coffee-colored, raceless, drone population inhabiting the planet in the near future.

[voerioc]

The collective power of the Jewish people is not unlimited. World domination by the Jews is therefore impossible.

Power-wielders - Jewish and non-Jewish - know this and use it to their advantage. "Anti-semitism" and scapegoatism are two sides of the same coin.

Yes, it's not unlimited. But you don't need unlimited power to control the world. With only 10.000 guys in power places, you can control a country quite easily.

And when you look at famous people, they stay in place during a very long time. So, there is not so much people in politics or in the medias, etc... In France, we have got just 3 different presidents since 1981 (Mitterrand, Chirac, and Sarkosy). And 70 % of famous politicians have been the same since 1990.

My opinion is that it is much easier to control a country or the world with a nation (so, jews) having 12 millions people, than with just hundreds people (the Illuminati theory).

Probably that Jewish leaders consider many of their fellows citizens as useful idiots. But that's not our problem. Many jews are relays of the will of Jewish leaders. They also believe totally that they are superior beings, and that all non jews are just cattle. They actively participate to our enslavement, and also to our elimination through race mixing. And so, they are enemies.

So, of course, we have to work to make the average jew come back to reason. But our primary goal is to make their tyranny stop.

[rerevisionist]

Very well-written, voerioc. You've included the numerical aspect and I think you're correct - Jews are *not* a "scapegoat". They really are a wordwide threat and menace.

Another thing is unelected hierarchies which are related to government: EU officials; police and their chiefs; lawyers and the heads of the legal system; educators and the people changing education systems; 'think tanks' aiming at policy changes; controllers of the state media - the BBC is the British example - and of art and culture; controllers of spying and listening; heads of the medical system; people controlling housing; people controlling movements of population - customs etc; civil servants in control of departments - war and peace, domestic policies; religious leaders; people in control of records and archives ... Many of these people are in power for life, and almost unaccountable, and irremovable. Very many of them are Jews.

It's disappointing that even such rather obvious material is all but unknown. It would be fairly simple to find organisation charts for many organisations, and mark Jews in them; less easy to check whether they do in fact behave as the anti-white Darwinian theory predicts. For example, the Speaker of the House of Commons [Bercow] is a fake 'Jew'. Speakers have the power to prevent some views being heard, and generally slanting debate, and I think arranging what potential legislation comes forward. Has he used any of these powers? Another example - statistics of crime, immigration, and population. The anti-white theory predicts that figures for crime by immigrants and Jews will be concealed, figures for immigration will be minimised, and figures for total population numbers will be made unavailable; are there, in fact, Jews in these state organisations who do these things? Even such fairly obvious assessments are not available, despite the vast number of supposed 'social scientists' out there.