9/11 was an inside job 2 of 2

Ramifications of nuclear issues are everywhere: subjects loosely or remotely linked to the nuclear bomb myth

Re: 9/11 was an inside job

Postby rerevisionist » 11 Feb 2012 18:27

Link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE


Youtube of four actors pretending to be grief stricken at 'deaths' of their 'loved ones'. https://www.septemberclues.info
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: 9/11 was an inside job

Postby rerevisionist » 15 Feb 2012 20:30

9/11 Best Actor Awards - 2012 Ceremony

Link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv6AtCybU4A
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: 9/11 was an inside job

Postby ewing2001 » 02 Mar 2012 20:57

this here is intriguing imo :

Image

from https://www.quofataferunt.com/index.php? ... tem&id=793
15 Februar, 2011
ewing2001
 
Posts: 57
Joined: 24 Nov 2011 19:40

Re: 9/11 was an inside job

Postby Cowan Bellarmino » 02 Mar 2012 22:17

Good links to September Clues. I stumbled onto their site a while back. I find their theory and Judy Wood's to be very interesting, and not that unrelated.

Wood is the college professor who claims it was a directed energy weapon that took down the towers. She's been dimissed among most of the truth movement intelligentsia. I find her theory intriguing because of the dustification of the towers. Here's her link:

https://www.drjudywood.com/
User avatar
Cowan Bellarmino
 
Posts: 20
Joined: 24 Feb 2012 16:03

Re: 9/11 was an inside job

Postby Exorcist » 03 Mar 2012 14:17

Cowan Bellarmino wrote:Good links to September Clues. I stumbled onto their site a while back. I find their theory and Judy Wood's to be very interesting, and not that unrelated.

Wood is the college professor who claims it was a directed energy weapon that took down the towers. She's been dimissed among most of the truth movement intelligentsia. I find her theory intriguing because of the dustification of the towers. Here's her link:

https://www.drjudywood.com/


Woods is Jewish and has been co-opted to create more fear in the minds of the guilible regarding non-existent "La La Fantasy Land" Star Wars Direct Energy Weapons. Just like Jesse Ventura and non-existent HAARP. Anyone who gives credence to this crap is blinkered.

It's also an attempt to divert peoples attention away from the real cause of the collapse. The twin towers were bought down by nano thermite and explosive demolition.
Last edited by Exorcist on 03 Mar 2012 15:45, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Exorcist
 
Posts: 73
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 14:21
Location: UK

Re: 9/11 was an inside job

Postby NUKELIES » 03 Mar 2012 14:55

It's also an attempt to divert peoples attention away from the real cause of the collapse. The twin towers were bought down by nano thermite and explosive demolition.


Right on with that one - that's the biggest case of cognitive dissonance in history. People are not stupid - they're corrupt.
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Re: 9/11 was an inside job

Postby Cowan Bellarmino » 05 Mar 2012 16:02

I was unaware of Wood's background. What is the source for that?

How did the combination of nanothermite and explosives turn the falling top of the South Tower into powder? I have limited scientific acumen, but as I've read thermite is used mainly on steel. Weren't the WTC buildings also comprised of concrete? If so, how would a nanothermite turn that into powder? In addition, are her other photos faked, the ones that show the field effects of metal deterioration over a mile away from the site?

Note inserted 7 Sept 2015 by rerevisionist:
The powder idea is total bullshit. It's a crude attempt to pretend the steel structure didn't exist. In fact of course Guiliani or his handlers arranged the steel to be shipped off as soon as possible. Allegedly to China. Without the angular and melted chunks of metal, out come the liars, from the woodwork - or in this case the metalwork - claiming there was only powder.
User avatar
Cowan Bellarmino
 
Posts: 20
Joined: 24 Feb 2012 16:03

Return to Other Revisionisms, Hyper-Revisionisms & Off-Topic Debates


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest