Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Propagandists, nuke liars, frauds, publicists, dupes - but also some debunkers - of nuclear and other issues

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » 25 Feb 2012 17:37


THESE AND MANY MORE REVIEWS ARE NOW ALL COLLECTED TOGETHER
Click here for COLLECTED REVIEWS


Amazon.co.uk removed all reference to this book, substituting 'correct' books

This review is from: Racist Murder.. The Macpherson Report by Dennis Norman, George Erdos, Ahmed Al-Shahi (Published by Civitas, 2000)

Racist Murder and Pressure Group Politics
Crit of the Stephen Lawrence 1993 murder and 'institutional racism', 6 May 2009

The title is misleading - the book is about the Macpherson Report into Stephen Lawrence's murder in 1993. After it, the commentariat all started to say 'the police are riddled with racism' despite the fact that 'no evidence of racism in the police who dealt with the case was ever produced.' Macpherson invented the phrase 'institutional racism'.

Dennis and Erdos date the racism industry from 1991: CCETSW ['Central Council for Education and Training in Social Work'] Diploma in Social Work guidelines 'set out in detail the new orthodoxy'. The 'self-evident truth' that 'racism is endemic in the values, attitudes and structures of British society.' No dissent ... would be tolerated. Colleges and courses that did not accept it would lose their licence to train social workers. Evidence of doubt was evidence of unsuitability...'

The Report was published in February 1999. Most of the book describes the inquiry, a sort of kangaroo court. (For my taste the three chapters on historical and sociological padding is of doubtful validity. For example, it is suggested all hate is more or less irrational and can never have a sound basis).

'There was more than a score of barristers... Witnesses were examined and cross-examined. But there were no defendants and no jury. Sir William [MacPherson] alone was responsible for assessing the degree and nature of the truth... His three advisors were the Rt. Reverend Dr John Sentamu, Bishop of Stepney; Dr Richard Stone, a general practitioner and chairman of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality; and Mr Tom Cook, a retired senior police officer. ..'

There was constant noise from the public gallery. The 'Black Police Association' is mentioned. (There is no white police association). ACPO, Association of Chief Police Officers, apparently a profit-making organisation, gets a mention. Pages 82-3 are on editing of taped interviews for the report, giving a false impression. There are pages and pages including a supposed expert witness who simply repeats the same stuff in different words.

I hate to sound querulous and captious and also lazy - but a straight account of the proceedings would I think have brought out their grotesqueness better. But at any rate this is an important effort at viewing these events objectively.

Your tags: anti-white racism, criminology, institutional racism, kangaroo court, lawrence report, macpherson report, stephen lawrence
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » 25 Feb 2012 17:37

Censorship? For some reason Amazon.com removed this book

American Post-Apocalyptic Novels (Book Guide): The Wanderer, I Am Legend, Alas, Babylon, the Postman, the Stand, a Canticle for Leibowitz [Paperback]

Image
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » 29 Feb 2012 21:17

This review is from: Backroom Boys by Noam Chomsky
Removed from Amazon.com
2 out of 5 stars - Suggests a new theory of why 'America' was involved in Vietnam
, 6 Oct 2010
By Rerevisionist

Image

I was a fan of Chomsky, who seemed at the time to be doing something about the Vietnam War. Chomsky was a participant in Bertrand Russell's War Crimes Tribunal, in 1967, an attempt to publicise facts about American atrocities in Vietnam.

'The Backroom Boys' is dated 1973 - later than, but a commentary on, the Pentagon Papers (published 1971).

It's a typical Chomsky political book - no consistent thread of argument, no chronology, many jumps from one topic to another, no signposting in the form of headings, and atrocity stories which is fact are understated - as Chomsky must know from Russell's Tribunal. In my view Chomsky presents a solidly crypto-Jewish world view. For example, he opposes armies marching to war - except against Germany. He opposes autocracy, but says little about the 'Communist' USSR; he makes no attempt to distinguish socialism from its Jewish deformation; he never mentions Jewish invention of the USSR. He dislikes poverty in India, but says China is 'Communist' and supposedly has better figures for e.g. life expectation. He dislikes apartheid, but says nothing about Jewish control of minerals in South Africa. He criticises the New York Times, but says nothing about Jewish control.

What I'm suggesting is that Kissinger, who seems to have been in control of US foreign policy at that time, was of course a puppet; his aim was to extend Rothschild control over south east Asia's currencies, to parasitise a permanent percentage from them. This is exactly what happened to National Socialist Germany, in which Hitler had explicitly thrown off that style of finance.

This does not explain why the US armed forces went along with genocide; maybe they were stupid, or sadistic, or wanted money and status. But the motive force was Kissinger and money. This is the hypothesis I wanted to test.

Is this consistent with Chomsky's book? I think it is. Chomsky criticises corporations, but never (as far as I know) criticises finance/ the Fed. He criticises the Army, but says nothing about Kissinger. He says nothing about the racist basis of Judaism, and its influence. He says nothing about Jewish media lies - which of course helped keep people in the dark about the US since 1954, when Dien Bien Phu was lost by the French.

I think Chomsky's role was to muffle and hide the Jewish element in committing genocide in Vietnam. Read this book carefully and decide for yourself.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » 29 Feb 2012 21:41

Propaganda by Edward Bernays
Removed from Amazon.co.uk AND Amazon.com


Image
Image hosted on imgur.com

[I don't have the original text - it was removed! But some other rerevisionist notes are: 'I doubt Bernays was particularly important - there were 'endless other wartime propaganda departments, peacetime newsaper editors, filmmakers, advertisers, legal manipulators of libel, school textbook writers etc etc etc, all doing their bit to tell lies. Bernays's book Propaganda doesn't say much analytically; he just instances things like promoting eggs and bacon 'as recommended by doctors' etc. I think his only selling proposition was being related to Freud, which no doubt he milked endlessly to get clients'.

Vance Packard mentioned The Engineering of Consent (1955) edited by Edward L Bernays, including Bernays on 'newsworthy events.. planned deliberately'.

Chomsky promotes Bernays in The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda but fails to mention: censorship of 'ZOG' groups in the USA; 1916 atrocity stories and anti-German propaganda of every sort, and of course the other world-war related censorship of Jews. Chomsky's book is mostly devoted to the lightweight marketing tricks of PR people, including Bernays.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » 29 Feb 2012 21:17

This review is from: Dead Aid: Why aid is not working and how there is another way for Africa by Dambisa Mboyo
Removed from Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk
A token black who ignores herds of African elephants in the rooms
, 28 Nov 2010
By Rerevisionist

DeadAid

A rather strange book. The writing style is pitiful—copied from the USA Jewish junk propaganda press, of the Time/Life sort. Staccato assertions and cliches ('palpable excitement', 'mounting evidence', 'latched on to', 'China is motoring', 'california-based interface', 'core focus of policy agenda', 'the Dutch Disease', with utterly irrelevant space-wasting 'human interest' anecdotes presumably as relief. All counter-evidence is censored or, possibly, simply not known or noticed. Large parts read like Goldman Sachs information to big investors - you can imagine Bill Gates or Spielberg being sent the stuff in bulk. For example, sparing the acronyms, in some African counties 'performance across the bond markets is impressive'. The numerical detail falters where ordinary Africans are concerned, though: the 'Myth of Aid' chapter talks of an 'African revival' which means there's been 1. A commodity prices 'surge', 2. 'Positive policy dividends' apparently meaning 'transparent and stable monetary performance' and 3. Some notable strides 'democratic elections and decline in perceived corruption'. It's typical of the book that all these things are unquantified, probably (I'd guess) because the commodities surge benefits only people nominally on company boards. Moyo is interested in performance of bond markets, and masses of people supposedly living on less than a dollar a day are ignored.

It's extraordinary that about thirty people are credited with contributing to and tuning up this book. They're even named!

A quick google shows she's been promoted by all the US media, a certain sign of Obama-style puppetry. It's worth debunking her qualifications: her parents presumably were the first wave of 'educated' blacks - her father supposedly spent eight years in the USA studying linguistics (although he couldn't speak his wife's language). Her mother studied English ditto. Moyo did four years at Oxford: Britan now has a huge debt, has been largely de-industrialised, and has been the victim of vast frauds, mostly of course Jewish, and is in the undemocratic EU, which is tottering. None of the Oxford 'thinkers' have any grasp on these issues. Oxford is also the home of the ridiculous phoney Evans, who retails WW2 propaganda. She also worked at Goldman Sachs, though what she did, if anything, is never stated. This doesn't prove she's no good, of course, but it's not encouraging. I have to say this because of the cocoon of publicity, which includes an unctuous introduction by Niall Ferguson, who is a sort of professional anti-white Rothschild apologist.

It's disappointing, though unsurprising, to find a total lack of any grasp of the possibilities of Africa. No doubt Africa needs appropriate technology, of which there is no sign. It's possible its geography needs reconsideration - many of the states seem hard to defend, for example, and after all they were only invented with lines on maps. There's the depressing possibility, undiscussed by Moyo, that Africans have such low IQs that nothing can be done. Africa has had more wars than many places on earth, and yet Moyo has no examination of spending on arms and who profited. There is nothing on money stashed abroad by some of the great dictators. Is it impossible to appropriate it? - No comment from the banking 'expert'. There's nothing on the actual mechanism: one imagines each of these countries has its Rothschild bank, printing money at huge interest, backed by nothing much, and there's a sort of credit entry, and of course a debit interest entry building up. Moyo gives no information on state banks or private banks which actually do the lending. (Incidentally, it's no surprise she has no idea about 'AIDS' - she's one of these people who spell 'healthcare' as one word).

There are notionally two parts to this book; one showing that aid doesn't work, the other showing what should be done. Neither part begins to address the issues.

I've quoted from the 'Myth of aid' chapter, but won't bother with the others. One would expect detail of how 'aid' has been damaging - figures of guesses for where it's gone, and details of what Moyo calls inevitably the 'fine print' - for example, in effect it's a gift to be paid for by buying the 'donor' country equipment. I wouldn't be surprised if all the power stations are supplied by different countries, at dfifferent voltages and fuels, for example. I'd be even less surprised to find the donors take a share, and black officals take another share. But there's no actual detail as to why it doesn't work - a truly incredible, tabloid style evasion, in contrast with the rates of return and balanced portfolio investment claims.

The second part is supposed to deal with what might be done; a lot relates to China, although close examination suggests China contributes only 15% to the influx of 'money'. Also FDI ('foreign direct investment', presumably a euphemism for investment not done through Goldman-Sachs). It's curious that Moyo says nothing about the South African model: after prolonged propaganda against apartheid, by the usual; media suspects, a joke system has been introduced, with all the mines under the same control as before. Worth a mention? Not to Moyo! She also mentions the problem of agricultural subsidies, both in the USA and the EU. The net effects are obscure - I'd guess deliberately, as it can't be conceptually that difficult to visualise. Anyway, she dislikes them, and supports free markets, which she thinks were the basis of development. Maybe her Oxford tutors hadn't heard of Empire Preference, the Zollverein, US tariff walls - but I suppose nobody's perfect. Another section looks at microfinance, something which Goldman-Sachs and the like obviously would avoid. It all sounds a bit like Friendly Societies and Building Societies in Britain. An example is the Grameen Bank in I think just Muslim countries north of India. Hard to judge, as Moyo seems unable to describe them accurately, and doesn't seem to know about Islamic dodges to pretend there's no interest, and there are accusations that they resemble Ponzi schemes. She also mentions remittances - she wants 1/4 of the income of come countries to come from remittances. (It is of course Jewish policy to flood African immigrants into Europe). There's a tantasling comment about savings squirreled away; maybe Goldman-Sachs have a memory of squeezing out gold from starving Russians in the 1930s, in the 'valuta' shops.

Let me try to summarise, first, what is OMITTED. There is NOTHING SYSTEMATIC WHATEVER on ---
[1] What does 'living on less than $1 a day' actually mean?
[2] What is actually done with 'aid'?
[3] What is the mechanism of 'donations' or 'aid' to these countries?
[4] How much damage was done to Africa deliberately by wars?
[5] Capital projects - e.g. new airport in India, space research - are paid for by e.g. the British taxpayer. Why?
[6] How much 'aid' goes nto the pockets of donor country officials, perhaps to build bolt-hole homes abroad?
[7] How much money from copper, oil, coffee, whatever actually goes to the inhabitants of the countries?
[8] Are there Fed / Bank of England style Rotshchild banks ripng off these countries?
[9] Is it deliberate policy to keep Africans desperate so they will invade Europe?
[10] How damaging are African superstitions such as Islam, Muti etc?
[11] Has anyone got any plans at all for developing Africa in a sane way?
[12] Is some sort of political union possible? The population of Africa is approaching that of China and there's no sign of it slowing. Why have dozens of countries?
[13] What does the 'World Bank', clearly an important 'aid' thing, actually do?

Now let me try to summarise HER SUGGESTIONS. I say 'try to' because of course they are coded and vague:-
[1] She wants a phone call 'scenario' - All African leaders should make a phone call saying aid will be turned off in (say) five years.
[2] 'Strengthening of institutions' she thinks is 'easy to implement' with just a phone call!
[3] Things can't get worse! She thinks the people on less than $1 a day won't be much harmed. I don't know - I can imagine Africa with all wild life eaten, all trees used for fuel, with cannibalism rife. But why worry.

Let me try to illustrate the insanity of this. Mr Mboto on the phone: "Hello, Mr Treasurer. I am the Prime Minister of Xland. As you know, I have a huge bureaucracy of my friends and my tribe, and we run our country, even if some of them find the work a little hard to do properly. I'm grateful for the 100 million in my bank, by the way. We have an army and airforce and national airline and our radio and TV. We have quite an expensive police system. As you know, you have our copper mine and palm oil plantations. Now we are going to cut off money from you, so that none of my tribe can be paid, and our wonderful armed forces will be unequipped, and our strongarm police will not be paid. That nice educated woman Moyo says it's easy to implement new institutions, so we will make one phone call and we will then have an educated civil service, proper entrepreneurial facilities, good hospitals, an exemplary legal system and a well educated workfoirce, with of course well-thought out plans to research and make use of local resources to supply the needed water, food and energy to our people."

This is clearly nuts. So what does the book actually mean? What's the subtext? I can only guess, but maybe something on these lines: [1] The Rothschild bank system must be kept, however much of a parasitical effect it may have on Africans. [2] All benefits to ordinary Africans should be offloaded onto white taxpayers, and anything profitable taken by investors. [3] The huge frauds recently carried out - mostly by the usual suspects - must be protected. [4] For cult racist reasons, blacks must be put into European countries as much as possible. [5] It's possible China does not have an arms supplier mentality, unlike other 'donors'. Maybe this is giving them an edge, which the others worry about. [6] There must be more!

I don't think Moyo's book is of any value. I'd personally be grateful if people on Amazon who recommend alternatives could give detailed reviews of the books they're recommending! Thank you! I'd like to have a better idea of what's going on!
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » 29 Feb 2012 21:17

This review is from: Fred Reed's website and books
Removed from Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk
Someone completely ignorant of all 'conspiracy' ideas
, 2012
By Rerevisionist

Image

I looked through the whole of Fred Reed's website. Fascinating to read someone completely ignorant of all 'conspiracy theory' material. For example, he believes in AIDS. (But also that someone he knew was cured of it). He believes blacks were brought up in the 50s in white-type households, and there was little mutual prejudice where he was brought up. But also that blacks live in a mental world that's ignorant of almost everything. (There's something similar expressed in the idea that LBJ's 'war on poverty' was a deliberate fraud). He seems to think US drug policy is entertainingly silly, because Congress 'doesn't do decisions'; he has no idea it could be deliberate, and even less idea that it is. He doesn't realise immigration is a deliberately damaging policy, nor who imposes it. He doesn't seem to have learned that laws are man-made, and often have functions which are kept secret. He doesn't realise that education might have other purposes than teaching simple reading and writing and a bit of technology so you can get a job and move out of the area. He dismisses evolution because there's no firm explanation for the beginning of life. And because it's hard to imagine the life cycles of insects evolving. He has liked quite a few Jews, so the conspiracy theories there can't be true. He doesn't know enough about science to be aware of scientific frauds. He avoids thinking about NASA, 9/11, nuclear weapons, the underside of the world wars, facts about money and subsidies and warbucks. He seems to have been a simple-minded 'veteran'. I suppose he's the 'universal soldier' type - maybe he manages to be both 5' 2"; and 6' 4".
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » 29 Feb 2012 21:17

This review is from: Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy remake
Not permitted on Amazon.co.uk
Tinker Tailor Soldier Liar, 2012 | by Rerevisionist

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy film promotional still
I think all the reviewers here have missed all the points. Which is the way this sort of propagandist material is of course meant to be taken in, by the taken-in. The Hungarian sub-plot ignored the blazingly obvious point that Hungary was run by Jews - and the 1956 revolt was part of the period supposedly depicted here. There was of course the supposed development of nuclear weapons - now known to have been a fraud, but used by Jews to pretend the USSR was a formidable force. The truth about atom spies - i.e. they were a phoney, to pretend Stalin and the USSR had got nuclear weapons - would have made a good story, but 'Le Carre', his story as fake as his name, could not write such a thing. Worth noting that a Rothschild during WW2 was allowed access to new developments such as radar. The idea of picking sides of course is part of the bullshit.

As is typical of propagandist crap, the setting has to be elaborate to give some illusion of accuracy. The faded marbly grandeur of official buildings, the filing cabinets, and the incoming melamine and formica style was quite well done. There was virtually no advertising, and this must have been a specific decision to give Britain a 'communist' impoverished feel. As is typical of 'Le Carre' there's a schoolboy element to the story - obviously a 'Circus' 'traitor' must be someone who was badly brought up. And the elderly lush, quite well done I thought by Kathy Burke. Another characteristic is the complete absence of discussion - so what if there were ships in the Black Sea? What had the 'mole' actually leaked? What sort of information was in fact valuable? What was American intelligence like? Was anyone interested in wars etc round the world? What political events were happening? Would one general in fact know much? - anything thoughtful is replaced by portentous abbreviations and slang, much as Americans use slogans to evade serious questions in their pathetic political pseudo-campaigning.

It's not quite the complete truth to say the film is 'boring'. Bear in mind that truths about the period are still cloaked and hidden; for example the truth about post-1945 eastern Europe, and for that matter the secret pushes to an undemocratic EU and unasked-for immigration. Cut out all that, and what's left is 'Le Carre', a hollow official story as unconvincing as Lenin's fake creative constructions.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » Sept 2012 21:17

This review is from: The World is Not Enough
Not permitted on Amazon.co.uk
1999 nuclear exit strategy Bond film | by Rerevisionist

Film poster The World is Not Enough - 007 - nuclear and pipeline themes
The World is Not Enough 1999 film - review posted 9 Sept 2012
Too difficult a film for most Amazon Reviewers!

[1] Almost a tick-box check list of features of 1950-2000 mass braindead entertainment for the operational type ...
* Cars exploding with vast amounts of fuel
* Product placement of buildings - London waste of money dome, Bilbao?, Thames... - so the studio shots seem to be somewhere
* A chase or two to allow suspension of thought - amphibious, skiing, powered parachute, supposedly in a nuclear submarine...
* Fights (fists usually) between a few characters. At least they don't sword fight. Enlivened with a few planned kicks, and moves designed around props
* Exotic-ish locations
* Special effects; here we have a five-part circular-saw cutting device, designed quite well
* Has to be in English. All the characters speak accented Eeengleesh, Meest-air Bond. There's a filmic joke about 'Mummerset' rural English; here we have something like 'Mussian'
* Official views of history taken for granted; in practice this means Zionist. The ridiculous Judi Dench as head of something also illustrates the feminist thing. There are some embarrassingly sidelined black actors. 'Terrorism' of course is something 'they' do
* Big wads of paper money!
* Ritualistic casino/ hotel room sex - to be fair the film makers could hardly show anything less dismal
* No impact bullets so that people aren't upset by what bullets do. With lasers. But nothing more recent

[2] Interesting more up to date themes..
* Swiss banker shown with thuggish colleagues. This must be a reference to Jews extorting money from the Swiss by the 'Holocaust' (TM) fraud.
* Nuclear stuff even more stylised than usual, with obvious designoid artefacts. This is the fraud that ran and ran. Interestingly, here it's in phase-out mode. It allows the female nuclear physicist, always half-dressed, considered necessary so that the way 'nuclear weapons' work isn't too obvious, despite the Carlyle baddie character understanding all about it.
* Interesting references to oil pipelines (or possibly gas) with graphics showing pipes snaking over landscapes, which may or may not have been models or computer graphics. This is a bit puzzling, since the motives for killing Afghans and others were kept secret; how many people have heard of TAPI? I take it that before the Jewish 9/11 fraud a couple of years later the pipeline(s) were considered done deals.

[3] Amusing to speculate on villains. What about villains who plot to flood white countries with immigrants, to weaken or destroy them? Who plan to foment divison and wars, to make fortunes for themselves? To publicise fake stories to (for exmaple) poison and damage large numbers of people? To cause hyper-inflation? To arrange slave labour to the death? All well-documented Jewish activities. I don't know enough about Ian Fleming to know what the bases were for his choice of baddies. Who knows?
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » 29 Feb 2012 21:17

This review is from: The Midwich Cuckoos
Not permitted on Amazon.co.uk
Invasion of the mind-snatchers. A parable of Jewish invasion. | 10 Sept 2012 by Rerevisionist

Midwich Cuckoos cover
Most fiction addresses concerns of the readership - few people read anything abstract or general. Science fiction no doubt follows this pattern, and therefore, rather paradoxically, usually has little scientific content. No writers predicted digital technology, for example. So it makes sense, looking at oldish fiction, to see which social concerns of the time are present. They may be more obvious looking back than they were at the time. Wyndham's story deals with the 'contesserate mind' - i.e. a mind made of separate units, like tiles, interlocked by 'telepathy', though Wyndham evidently felt this wasn't enough, as his fictional joint mind was given the special ability to influence other human minds. The English event turned out not to be unique: dotted around the world other clusters of births had been generated at the same time. This is, or may be, a commentary on Jewish monomaniacal intrusiveness. It may also refer to television, at that time at its maximum rate of increase in Britain. Much the same thing, in any case. The explosive finale in Britain - others elsewhere are described, but not in any detail - isn't very well worked-out, as a single mind-reading person, let alone a group, would seem unlikely to fail to notice a murder plot against them.

Another issue, not much considered by Wyndham, is the mass rape or mass implantation of embryos. There's not much on medical implications, and not much on people wondering if it might happen again, both rather unreasonable plot devices, as is Zellaby's daughter 'falling' pregnant, but the child being human, despite both parents' protestations they'd 'done nothing'. One can imagine men from the Ministry turning up. In keeping with the times, an assurance from authority figures suffices for Wyndham.

Four stars because of the inconsistent and not very plausible plot-line. But the scene-setting of the time is quite good - rivalry between three English villages, coal fires, small shops, rather primitive sports cars, professors a rarity, record players, Peter Ustinov and the theatre, Flanders and Swann-style entertainment, high status of dim military types, neat suburbs, naive beliefs about the BBC and Germans and wars.

With computer film (or digital recording) techniques this could be made, with some plot tweaks, much more compelling than the old version(s) - I can only remember a black and white version with laughable effects.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Book, Film & DVD Reviews Censored by Amazon

Postby rerevisionist » 29 Feb 2012 21:17

This review is from: Christopher Isherwood: Mr Norris Changes Trains
Not permitted on Amazon.co.uk
A curiosity of propaganda by a sad little poof. 25 Sep 2013 by Rerevisionist

First published February 1935
Second Impression March 1935
New edition June 1937
It's quite interesting to read this curiosity, clearly written as a propagandist 1930s thing, and published by Hogarth Press, of Bloomsbury.

One of the reviews or blurbs here described this as about 'pre-war Berlin' - probably whoever scribbled that hadn't heard of the 'first World War'.

The whole thing is not credible and in fact I have to wonder whether Isherwood spent any time in Germany at all; the descriptions are so utterly devoid of anything characteristic of Germany that one has to wonder if in fact the whole thing was made up, with a bit of guidebook backing. I can't remember, for example, a single street or building being named; and the German language extracts are exiguous and barely exist.

And it's amusing to see from these Amazon reviews how Americans in particular, doped by their Jewish controllers, think in terms of films rather than facts.

Thus Isherwood presumably liked anal sex (there's a school reference suggesting this). And, therefore, Germans were decadent! Mr Norris is shown as a violence fetishist; this of course means that Germans are fetishists! Isherwood's narrator presents himself as a neutral observer; in fact, after naval blockades during which many Germans starved, it's unlikely they would be as well-disposed to him as this novel suggests. (He's put forward as a teacher of English, with pupils, but with nothing to suggest this was in any way genuine).

For some reason many reviewers think the descriptive writing is excellent; in fact it's rather laughable, and mainly concerned with peoples' faces; Norris is described in rather painful detail, mostly in conflicting ways as the book drags on. However he does just manage to emerge from one dimension into one and a bit. He has zero plausibility: a man with an inheritance, which he squandered, and which Isherwood is careful not to trace to any roots, with obvious character and money problems, is not credible as a spy; the plot in fact can only be held together by withholding essential evidence.

Isherwood's grasp of the politics (this was a time when Stalin's murder machine, funded by Jews, was building arms factories, tanks, and so on, preparing to invade Europe) is infantile. It's conceivable that Jews might have decided to change sides; if for example Germany had offered to guarantee Palestine. But of course there's nothing in this book of possible twists of history.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40




Return to Rogues Gallery: People, Groups, Organizations with Some Nuclear Links


Who is online



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest