Most Reviews | Big Lies site

Selected Reviews by Subject:- Film, TV, DVDs, CDs, media critics | 'Holocaust' | Jews, Christians, Moslems | Race | Revisionism | Women | Bertrand Russell | Richard Dawkins | Martin Gardner

Esther Vilar - Manipulated Man   Review of 1971 book on Male/Female War   Esther Vilar: The Manipulated Man

Part of the post-1945 Jewish Subversion of White Society
  20 March 2016
I vaguely remember seeing, many years ago, probably on BBC TV, a typically staged debate on women's issues. Only with Internet was I able to recover the name 'Esther Vilar'. Youtube now has a reprise: Alice Schwarzer and Esther Vilar in a staged German TV chat. Vilar made quite a good case for males being exploited by women, with work until retirement and differences in life expectation. This of course is not in Third World conditions, with white expectations of competence! Vilar seemed to have little grasp of the medical and nutritional reasons for life expectation differences. Schwarzer presented a rather comical post-1945 'feminist' viewpoint. The clue here seems to be that both are/were Jews, or perhaps near-Jews. The only things they agree upon are 'fascism', and upon mutual implicit indifference to world upheavals at that time.

It is true that women, like men, can calculate advantages and disadvantages. And it is true women's styles are likely to be a matter of pleading rather than strength. And it is true marriage can be hugely advantageous. (Vilar writes: 'Women are physically much weaker than men, their brains demonstrably smaller and not constructed for problem-solving [sic], so dependency could have distinct evolutionary advantages. But the real answer has to be discovered ... in the hormones which race so headily through a man's bloodstream.') Anyone who is shocked by these simple facts might benefit from reading Vilar. Deeper readers will perceive the incipient promotion of 'pornography', homosexual marriage, support for mentally ill persons, Jews using women as prostitutes, men as rapists and child molesters, money-making from divorce, abortion support, family court corruption, and what have you.

This turns out to be just more useful idiocy and divide-and-rule pseudo-debate.
An earlier writer in English on women as cunning gold-diggers was Ludovici; in Woman—A Vindication (1923) he puts women's desire for a family as her motive—testing men rather like a female butterfly testing its food plant. Vilar just puts acquisitiveness there. Vilar says 'The average American woman is a whore. Her vagina is a business, and this business is extortion. Her most cherished goal is to live at a man's expense, to luxuriate in a life without work or responsibility'. Note the misuse of the word 'whore'—the danger, the short-termism, the decline with age, is a typical Jewish misuse of a word. In any society with mobility, and choice, and a legally-policed structure without much in the way of shotgun weddings and rapes, and with control over fertility, such attitudes are going to occur. Possibly in 1923, with deaths of men during the Great War, Ludovici seemed new, but I think by 1971 it's surprising Vilar attracted much attention; assuming of course that the publicity resulted in sales—it's usually impossible to know even approximate figures.
It's worth noticing the specifically Jew-blind attitude of Vilar. 'Moreover, it is women who control 80% of the nation's wealth...' is her claim; the realities of Jews and paper/ e-money are ignored. The publicity given to these people is just another aspect of the Jewish impulse to harm whites. And it's been fairly successful: in the American 'academic' world, many female 'professors' are a bad joke. Vilar has the post-1945 Jewish view of 'feminism', i.e. not the earlier moderate versions: 'Never before have females been so brazenly mercenary as today's "liberated" woman. Feminism, which masquerades as a philosophy which would celebrate character over materialism, has become nothing more than a license to exploit men.'
    And in the legal world, there's been very little attempt to work out rational rules for divorce. There's a parallel with blacks, where Jewish lies have successfully suppressed rational discussion on race differences.
A message here, which many people seem unable to learn, is to follow the money—or in this case follow the funding. When Jewish money is to be used for some harmful purpose, one of the stages is to secretly pay 'activists', propagandists, thugs, or whatever, and to tip off the Jewish media. It's a similar process to advertising some new Hollywood film, or some new target for war.

Top of Page