• Sun Tzu - The Art of War. Notes by Rerevisionist

Notes by Revisionist on Sun Tzu On the Art of War

Speculation on links between 'Jews' and China; which, if either, influenced the other?

These notes were suggested by a video by 'Hoaxashian', on Bitchute in early December 2019. (Youtube's Jewish owners had closed his account there some time earlier). His video was DECEPTION IN THE (((ART))) OF WAR and he quoted a few extracts from the Thomas Cleary translation into English, apparently dated 1988. Hoaxashian is not concerned with the fine points of identifying and translating very old manuscripts. He quoted from a chapter translated (he said) as 'Strategic Assessments': ‘Cause division among them. Send interlopers to cause rifts among them. Break up their accords, cause division between the leadership and their ministers - and then attack. This means that if there are good relations between the enemy leadership and its followers then you should use bribes to cause division. You may cause rifts between their leadership and their followers, or between them and their allies. Cause division and then take aim at them.’

[The first English translation, by Lionel Giles, was published in 1910 by Luzac and Co. in London. It's here, and no doubt in other places: https://ia802304.us.archive.org/25/items/artofwaroldestmi00suntuoft/artofwaroldestmi00suntuoft.pdf and certainly appears more professional, with alternative readings and general detail, including Chinese characters and comments on Germany.]

Hoaxashian, having been mimicked on line, was and is very conscious of Jewish lies. He gave a list of online examples: Sargon of Akkad / Tommy Robinson/ Rebel Media / Stefan Molyneux / Pat Condell / Infowars/ Paul Joseph Watson/ styxhexenhammr/ Tim Poole/ Computing Forever. As he correctly states “They're anti-Muslim but not anti those who bring Muslims in - they never call out these faked events, like London Bridge.”

There are many rather absurd plaudits for this book which in my opinion don't begin to hold water. My best guess is that it looks philosophical, rather than giving hard information on killings, weapons, starvations and so on. Nothing in it about raping women, burning people to death, bombing, starving, and enslaving populations. Wikipedia for example says Admiral Heihachiro of Japan, and who won the Russo-Japanese War, was 'an avid reader of Sun Tzu'. I'm inclined to think Rothschild funding did the trick. Giap was supposed to have been an avid practitioner, but the fact that the USA, USSR and others were run by Jews might have had something to do with it. I was amused to read in Wiki that 'The Department of the Army in the United States, through its Command and General Staff College, has directed all units to maintain libraries within their respective headquarters for the continuing education of personnel in the art of war.' Gum-chewers and medal staplers as literate? Come on!

Given the claimed age for versions of the book, it's of course no surprise to find even the name of the author or authors is in doubt. In 1972, a discovery was made of 'exceptionally well-preserved' bamboo scripts (calligraphic; well before printing) in Shandong, which seem to have helped lead to Shandong Museum. As far as I can tell, this is blessedly free from disfigurement by 'Holohoax' junk in the West.

It's clearer than it was—the Jewish media have concealed it completely—that Jews or some varieties of Semites had settlements in China. It's possible that they copied from Chinese writings, perhaps adding their own psychopathy. Luzac and Co in 1910, and Lionel Giles, may have been Jew-related. Or maybe vice-versa: perhaps Confucius was a promoted by Jews, after assessing the outlook of the Chinese. And the extracts from Hoaxashian suggest that Chinese generals were advised to bribe, divide, cause divisions—and at a high level. I doubt if much evidence survives about the warring states'; were the states sufficiently similar that enemies could penetrate them and plot, even with senior officials? If not, the advice would appear to be inapplicable.
Art of War has material on money and silver, food and work and the Chinese masses, appropriate to an emperor, but less so to a caste of warriors ordered what to do by their superiors. This suggests links with Jews, linked with invisible ties to other parts of the world. FirstClassSkeptic suggested seven years ago that paper money may have had its root in China and been advertised in Europe by Marco Polo.