Dr. David Starkey, ‘historian’ attempts crude historical parallels.
Whilst avoiding embarrassing Jewish truths

Rae West 30 April 2021, 12 May 2022. Revised 7 January 2023

“I Was Cancelled but I Won't be Silenced for Speaking Objective Truth”

These are my notes on an 'exclusive' video posted 18 April 2021. My 56½-minute version of it is here in case the original is moved, deleted, or deplored as Youtube-y. It's arranged to be relatively easy to download and to save, for example on a memory stick.

The video is something close to a monologue by David Starkey, with Peter Whittle of 'New Culture Forum'—which is online, founded 2006, never mentions Jews, and has a Youtube channel.
[ I noticed the NCF had an advert on the Jew who they present as '... German-born American political theorist Hannah Arendt ...'. The NCF is a poor man's version of the TED Youtube channel. If it remains, the 'exclusive' video may be viewed here, at the 'NCF' site on Youtube. Whittle and Starkey appear to belong, or wish to belong, to the old-style literary journal world (Starkey mentions The Critic) offering ponderous language, regular payments, plus, often, ludicrously unimportant matter.]

My intention here is to explain the failure of universities, and their evasions from important issues into trivia. Starkey and Whittle, in this talk, have a view of the USA that might have been taken from such people as Dennis Brogan or Arthur Schlesinger, hopelessly out of touch with the real USA, heavily influenced from the start by east European Jews and their collaborators. Truths about Jews in the USA, and in world wars, atrocities, and other events, seem out of the range of the 'historian' and his presenter.
British history is presented in a comically Jew-free format. I haven't checked for Jewish and other secret influences on Starkey. But note that he has done what was expected of him, routinely lying and equally routinely collecting money. He pats his own head throughout.

The Plot of the video: Both parties have noticed, without showing evidence of understanding, the campaign in Jewish media to disparage whites, especially males—females being assumed to be shallow and presumably tempted by nignogs given money. But neither party is willing to discuss Jews, who have dominated Britain since Cromwell and the founding of the so-called 'Bank of England', and before. Starkey and/or Whittle may be 'Jews', part of the 'controlled opposition', like A J P Taylor. So, watch as the sparks fail to fly! ...
All names quoted are from Starkey. My notes are more or less verbatim, plus 'revisionist' material not in the original.

0-10 mins David Starkey (Historian and Author) Daily Telegraph - The oldest mainstream media [sic] ... After cancellation I'm assumed to be a social pariah ... nothing could be further from the truth ... aspects that fill me with institutional horror ... I've been a very distinguished member for a very long time .. drop you on extraneous grounds ... the Royal Historical Society [later: under the disgraceful leadership of Margot Finn. Her work includes something on the East India Co, though not Jews in China etc, as far as a glance reveals] ... on a minor view of the use of language ... is more important than fifty years of scholarship... one's Cambridge College does the same. This is wholly destructive ... breaks that Burkeian bond of generations ... student .. distinguished member .. become rich ... endow it ... break it...
[Somewhere, Starkey boasted about being rich and watching his investments. It appears that the BBC gave him £2 million, in the same way Simon Schama was given money for his rubbish. Good examples of diverting taxed money to Jews.
On about 3 July 2020, Starkey said in an interview something about 'too many damned blacks', but was too tired, bored, etc to withdraw this. I take this from Google; I'm not clear exactly what happened, but he seems to have had his memberships terminated. He is supposed to be an expert on Tudor England; and I recall being at a session for pre-university students of official history. Starkey shows no visible understanding of the Jewish hegemony, since 1694 and 1913, of Jews on money. If academics say anything true about Jews, they're out.]

... Baroness Sally Morgan of Fitzwilliam College ... New Labour apparatchik ... no intellect ... this is Cambridge!! ... Rewriting one's will ... what a pleasure! ... quite a lot [Starkey was paid £2 million for some TV series on the Tudors; possibly he referred to that. He makes no mention of the pressures on supposed academic leaders. The same sort of thing applies in the USA, with Jewish Ivy League 'Presidents'.]

[2 October 2017, Professor Stephen J Toope became the 346th Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge, says Google. (Is that a credible figure?) Starkey makes fun of the name, but doesn't notice that Canada has for a long time been under the thumb of Jews.] ... this regime prioritising the alleged feelings of minorities. Cambridge lies at the heart of the intellectual adventure of the last 500 years. It was second string to Oxford before that until the Tudor period... Trinity College won more Nobel Prizes than the whole of France... now leads the charge in the reverse direction... I thought of our society ... broadening freedom ... at the outset of COVID .. a Chinese virus means a Chinese society... we are reversing values... we're a tiny dot... that adventurism, creativity ... we're throwing it away ...
[An article by Starkey in The Critic is available online, free. It's about as useful as Chomsky and Susan Sontag on AIDS.]
[The sad fact is that Oxbridge has failed to address the primary issue, that of Jews. The 'Civil War' invasion from Holland and the subsequent centuries have never been investigated. 18th century country houses and the 'Lords Spiritual' and other effects of Jewish money remain unexplored. Nor have the absurdly Jewish-oriented religions in Britain, with the ridiculous King James Bible.
Somewhere, Starkey compared the Reformation, attributed to Luther, with 'Woke', which he thinks is an intellectual 'revolution'. Part of his argument involved the techniques of printing (and Wittenberg and its University's new printing press). Starkey seems blissfully unaware of the realities of censorship.]

[Whittle asks: Were you surprised? David Starkey replies:] All human progress depends on nay-saying... brought up as a Quaker ... certain flair for language... my astonishingly successful career... 1960s genuine period of liberation... my astonishingly successful career ... Je m'en fou... [That over-simple theory of progress seems to be the only fruit of his years of 'scholarship'. Note in passing recent evidence that Quakers, 'friends', were just another crypto-Jewish group introduced by Cromwell.]

10-20 mins [Whittle: I'm sure most people will have heard of it, but '.. A particular phrase that you used...'] David Starkey: ... There's a a competition for victimhood... I was born with two club feet, with polio, turned out to be gay, acutely short-sighted ... I've got a brain... poor... outsider.. I've always despised victimhood.. 1945 Education Act.. Grammar School ... you had to do your best... you would get there is you were better.. Nationalist Ireland... ["Most distressful country there that ever was seem / They're hanging men and women there for the wearing o' the green"—something like that. Dodges starvation in Ireland!] Most Oppressed People Ever ... Dame Jenny Murray bored women...
[I haven't attempted to check any of this. Under the influence of Miles Mathis, I view these accounts with scepticism. Club feet? Polio? Non-conformist; Quaker? Poor? He must be right in his identification of the 1944 Education Act, which must have largely been designed to shelter Jewish lies and reward inter-war Jewish immigrants. Just as Education Acts after the Boer War and Great War had their hidden agendas].

The Germans have come to terms with its history .. we have not.. is slavery a holocaust, because that is a claim of the left ... panel denunciation Churchill at Churchill College ... Kehinde Andrews this pseudo-professor of black studies [at Birmingham City University] ... white empire as holocaust ... so many blacks in the USA and Britain [sic] ... it was stupid, it was badly-expressed...
[I was amused to see Starkey is a proponent of the Holocaust fraud! His whole attitude is an unhistorical joke. He doesn't mention Russians and Ukrainians murdered by Jews—of course. On the related-by-Jewish-repetition issue of race relations, of course the only reason there are race problems in Britain is because Jews used backdoor leverage to generate and fund unwanted immigration and pressure against white births.
On slavery, he doesn't seem to know all slaveholders were reimbursed by a long-term Jewish loan. And he seems not to realise that steam power, at that time, was making slaves redundant.]

The height of the fever of Black Lives Matter ... ludicrous imitative thing ... we do share a language; cultural infection... ... ludicrous attention to American [Presidential] elections... strength of feeling about Trump... founding fathers were perfectly aware of the possibility of a demagogic President... The Critic .. my regular column ... we are a mongrel culture, a conquered country... we are post-colonial ... no such thing as pure English ... when Shakespeare wrote only 150 years after ... astonishing ... peculiar adaptability ...
[Starkey doesn't understand how Jews fund invented pressure groups, busing funded 'leaders' around with the rented 'protesters', furnishing them with banners etc, and ensuring the police support them. It's amusing to think the US and UK, and the rest of the world, are kept independent, with sketchy knowledge of each other; only Jews are allowed to co-operate, and control the media ruthlessly.
It's unsurprising that this unawareness is so common. The BBC for example never looks into the background of pressure groups, demonstrators, people with banners, violent thugs. Most of these are Jew-controlled; nobody else has the money to burn.]

20-30 mins Scotland ... Scot Nats, victimhood ... 1707 Act of Union of two sovereign powers... we were always multi-ethnic ... multiple layers of identity ... USA different ... increased use of the Supreme Court [list of unimportant differences recited from memory; for example some sports events start with England vs Scotland]
[Amusing to see his flexibly-modified use of 'multi-ethnic' to cover England and Scotland, and Europe, but also Africans and Muslim blacks].

... competition for most victim status ... the left's attack is to claim the British Empire is equivalent to the Nazis ... they require equivalent atonement ... that slavery is the equivalent of the Jewish genocide... all of these seem to me to be complete rubbish ... intellectually slovenly ... six million Jews are killed deliberately ... begins with the Lawrence Enquiry ... English law used to depend on the objective test of evidence ...
[Starkey uses 'left' in the Jewish American media sense, meaning something like pro-Stalin, anti-white, money printing, war against Jewish targets, pro-taxation of whites now and in future for use by Jews and aliens, though Starkey doesn't draw attention to that, perhaps drawn on by his lies about Germans].

You're exaggerating .. Burke at the height of the French Revolution .. grasshoppers ... it's words, words, words ... great triumph of Britain is victory of inductive experimental test of truth ... modern science and technology ... I ... never insulted any person of colour .. have lived in multi-cultural London ... since 1952. Only explicable in religious terms ... heresy ...

30-40 mins
[It's amusing, or perhaps unamusing, to see Starkey's lack of knowledge of scientific method, and of the 'French' Revolution. And it's grotesque to see him accept 'multicultural London, imposed on Britain by Jews and their collaborators, as though natural. This sort of thing leads me to believe Starkey is just another Jew liar.]

I'm a Stoic ... they want to humiliate you ... but only if you let that happen ... [mentions Jordan Peterson] ... gay or because I am trans I require the world to make special allowance ...
[Starkey knows perfectly well that job loss can be a very powerful lever. NB later, he mentions Cornford's Microcosmia Academic (1908), misquoting the bit about 'academics .. vicious ... because the stakes are so low. In fact, of course, the stakes are high, as Starkey knows perfectly well.]

Cambridge ... Like the great Library of Alexandria .. is the custodian of our civilisation ...[Sigh]

Meghan and Harry ... disgraceful charge of racism ... crisis of the monarchy ... forgotten within a week ... 'woke' ... 'wokery' ... permanent secretaries in the civil service ending official memoranda with [black power gesture?] .. it's as as bad as using the swastika .. very interesting .. I was principal contact with CBS for royal matters until 2017 ...
[Fascinating to speculate on takeovers by pretenders, especially bastards. I simply don't believe the CBS connection; the 'Royal Family' must have endless retainers and official experts on monarchical oddities. Note the thing about the swastika.]

America is split down the middle by the 'Left' ... [Starkey doesn't grasp the Jewish influence] Lee Cohen in the Spectator ... division corresponds to Democrat vs Republican .. as does COVID ... and Brexit.. remain or leave...
[The junk press of course is full of hack Jews, hewing to Jewish scripts. They are very keen indeed to keep to the Jewish party line: two controlled oppositions rule everywhere. This is safe, though stupid, since it ignores external facts. On Brexit, the most interesting view known to me is from Hexzane527 from France, who views it as moving a piece to arrange the board for World War 3.]

40-50 mins [Women as minorities enables Starkey to allude to gender divide, battle of the sexes, and a reaction against 'woke' as "boys are getting fed up of it". Let's not be 'violent and neo-fascistic'"]

Starkey wrote on COVID in The Critic. I described this (above) as not worth reading. it saddened me that Starkey had to say "history only works backward" since of course he has no grasp of motive forces in events (or couldn't talk of them if he had).

COVID ... the government lost its nerve on 13th 14th 15th March... all the evidence has come up to show I am absolutely right! ... that weekend everything changed ... Neil Ferguson's absurd preposterous predictions .. BSE ... slaughter of the national herd ... Chinese virus, Chinese lockdown. Only a dictatorship can impose a lockdown [48 min] Civilisations die from inside ... Gibbon's Decline and Fall .. attributed to Christianity ... Nietzsche as a religion for slaves ... we've embraced slavery...

50-56 mins [On Christianity and Nietzsche, note what Starkey doesn't say: he's correctly enough happy to slag off Christianity, which is just another Jewish thing—note how churches get land and get 10% and pay out minimum salaries. BUT Starkey does not say anything about the Jewish projection of itself as a vicious 'God'.
The only guaranteed immunity is the immunity from prosecution of the companies making the dangerous jabs. Starkey uses the standard Jewish divide-and-perhaps-rule tactic of insulting foreigners: Germans, French, Chinese. He hasn't understood that Jewish money control allowed them sufficient power to control Europe's media, especially in the Second World War with the actor puppet Hitler. A series of events far more impressive than a fake pandemic. Starkey thinks only a dictatorship can do that.
Starkey said: "mathematical modelling is pure ju-ju" stumbling I thought; perhaps he meant Jew-Jew. Of course mathematical models can be powerful and helpful, if the motive is genuine discovery.]

NHS worship ... party of the NHS ... preposterous slogan, protect the NHS ... they're supposed to be protecting us...
Churchill kept a tame scientist ... [Presumably Lindemann] Marvellous slogan of Churchill: scientists should be on tap but not on top.
Starkey really imagines people like Hancock and Whitty ('Chief Medical Officer') and Van Tam are scientists, and on top. In fact, they resemble scientists about as much as Starkey resembles genuine historians. Vast numbers of scientists are denied any voice.

I'm back in the Tudors ... partly thinking of my memoirs ... Microcosmia Academica [1908] F M Cornford, the great classicist ... stakes are so small...
[On Cornford, his 1908 booklet was only about five years from the devastation of Europe, a strong hint that classics as taught then were useless in understanding history.
In fact, the stakes are high, as Starkey knows well. The C of E in its wealthy days took about half the entire output of Oxbridge each year. Of course this sort of thing causes competition. As for the Henrys, look at Henry VII by the highly original Miles Mathis, looking at crypto-Jews from Anglesey, their island off Wales.]

[Starkey has an anecdote about G R Elton, yet another Jew-insert into Britain. And 5 minutes more, of considerable unjustified egoism, including documents as the sole source of history, except presumably for all the padding and assumptions and repetition. Starkey is working on the marriage of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York.
Starkey of course ignores Jewish atrocities, which are usually ordered from above down to goyim. And of course such atrocities are usually hushed up.
Starkey is (as is traditional) entirely ignorant of techniques, perhaps because they act slowly enough to be below the threshold of attention. The 'Iron Age' has some serious meanings. So does gunpowder: the looting of Mysore (SW) and Bengal (NE) India, and of China, and in the 20th century anywhere unindustrialised, have serious messages. It's possible that simple Americans, bombing many countries, have left a legacy of hate, so that, if the USA is ruined by Jews and their allies, many people will say to themselves "You Americans had it coming. Your turn now."

Dr. David Starkey, ‘historian’ attempts crude historical parallels. Whilst avoiding embarrassing Jewish truths

Dr. David Starkey, ‘historian’ attempts crude historical parallels.
Whilst avoiding embarrassing Jewish truths