The title is Inferior. And so is the book.
Inferior by Angela Saini
Review by Rae West 29 Sept 2020. 2017 4th Estate 'An imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers'. London.
Plus Royal Institution Christmas Lectures on Earth - A User's Guide
Saini, in her acknowledgements, thanks the Author's Foundation and K. Blundell Trust for a research grant (for 'exciting new work' according to their website, amount unspecified. Kathleen Blundell is supposed to have 'generously endowed' her Trust. It seems to be linked to an Oppenheimer-John Downes Award, the sort of thing to be expected in view of the snowstorm of Jewish support for rubbish) including travel; she had access to Darwin's correspondence at Cambridge, the Wellcome Library which I'd thought was taken over by Sackler, the Jewish 'drug king', and two outfits with 'Intersex' in their name. Credits include Robert Trivers of speculations on the evolution of deception.
Her claims have vague edges, something often found with women 'intellectuals'—'In 2020 Angela was named one of the world's top 50 thinkers by Prospect magazine' is one; a Masters in Engineering from Cambridge University is another (Cambridge automatically issued a 'master' to its graduates after a year, and I presume still does); 'award-winning journalist' is another. A few years ago the EU started some sort of advertising project to try to get girls (and 'minorities', who in fact are majorities in the world). The abbreviation 'STEM' ('Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics') has 'STEM Ambassadors', all perhaps stemming (apologies) from EU advertising agencies.
The book's contents are not new, perhaps assembled since about 1950 when Jews won the Second World War and started to spread their debts, corruption, and incompetence. Saini even quotes 'Ashley Montagu' (real name something Jewish) on the 'superiority of women'. They cover health (Saini doesn't bother much with dangers of childbirth, or abortion for that matter), brain size or rather weight (a perennial issue), work (plenty of scope for statistical errors on pay), but not much substantial on mental differences. All these issues are pushed by Jews, including 'intersexuality', and Jews carefully avoid mentioning they are the most racist group in the world, as does Saini. Saini hates 'eugenics' in a laughably insane way—an issue of some interest to Jews, who tend to selectively kill the intelligent, as in the Jewish USSR, and have rather crude eugenics of their own, their system biasing towards Rabbis.
I was fascinated to find a scientific dispute between Robin P. Clarke and Simon Baron-Cohen on autism, here in which Baron-Cohen is identified as a holocaustianity fraud. One has to have sympathy with Cambridge University; probably they'd lose a lot of Jewish paper money if they insisted on truth-telling. Bit sad, though. A bit like Lysenko. Steven Rose is a similar Jewish type, though from the socially inferior Open University.
Saini has written for the New Scientist; I had a collection of these around the 1970s and noted they had nothing on weaponry and war crimes, or any such topic. I haven't bought it for many years; it's pitifully feeble trash. She also appears on BBC Radio, which is of course trash. Oh—and the Guardian, also trash—I wouldn't attempt to rank these by their rankness! She has a few Youtubes, a guarantee of unoriginality. She needs acting lessons: she couldn't even remember her routine Jewish lies about race. Her follow-up book is called Superiority. I wonder if some of her ancestry was high caste?
She appears to have been born in 1980, and therefore is now about 40. Publishing as a perilous business, especially now with Internet's ability to corrode and snipe at reputations. Remember Susan Greenfield? And it's expensive to pay for whole industries of frauds, even by printing trillions in the Jewish fashion: think 9/11 and Silverstein, think of the repulsive frauds like 'Astronaut Buzz Aldrin', think of the huge scam of 'coronavirus', think of the 'Holohoax' as it's sometimes known, think of the 'Federal Reserve'. In the Middle Ages, churches had something like a monopoly of timewasting scams; now, in place of Scriptoria producing handwritten MSs, we have junk propaganda, in each case with Jews behind-the-scenes.
This book by Saini is ostensibly aimed at girls at school. I doubt it can have had any success, in view of its obvious insincerity and feebleness. In a way this is tragic: the world faces crises—for example in India, ancestral home of Saini—and unrealistic bravado is not much of a response. There are vast issues of food and water, population, energy, buildings, education, which need competent people worldwide if they are to be alleviated. Is it in fact possible that African blacks an (or should) maintain anything advanced? Only a few weeks ago some potential employer bemoaned the small pool of talent. Can India and China free themselves from Jews? I don't know; but it seems doubtful. Many whites can't understand the problems; how many other groups can? By pretending science is simple, and fantasising about 'black' and female achievements in science and technology, these people are doing nobody any favours, except perhaps advertising agencies. Much of science is fraudulent: the 'coronavirus' fake shows tenth-rate Jews in government can easily over-ride experts, so that probably anyone with medical expertise is in a hopelessly weak position.
Saini wrote Geek Nation: How Indian Science is Taking Over the World. I haven't seen this book, or perhaps booklet, but I expect this sort of thing is likely to be disappointing as Indians seem unable to dissect out nonsense (NASA, nukes etc), and unable to describe things—watch Youtubes on topics such as Bow's Notation or Bayesian logic or statistical distributions or cell biology. Trials of mass produced thinkers so far has produced large numbers of mediocrities—look at the USA—but technicians may be easier. Female engineers and vets and medical specialists and traffic flow people seem possible.
The era of Jewish parasitism, harm, and large-scale murder must (I hope) come to an end fairly soon. But it's impossible to be optimistic.
Christmas 2020 had three television programmes from the Royal Institution's lecture room. On BBC4 TV. Three one-hour Christmas Lectures on 'Planet Earth'. They weren't quite 'lectures', but, rather, fun things for kids which I hope appealed more to them than to me: all of course mixed race etc, childish visual aids, technical diagrams from nowhere, outputs from unexplained machines. The kids were all at home, 'isolated' from the fake 'COVID 19' virus. The two or so assistants in the stage area wore black masks, I suppose for emphasis. The three episodes has three presenters; I suppose they'd be called 'talent' by the BBC's retards. All the supposed experts were young women; one had a Muslim name. A TV linked showed someone supposedly from Chad, videod perhaps by traditional native electric magic. The first part was presented by a 'black' as they call them, called Chris Jackson. He was supposed to be a geologist. The second, mostly on the oceans, by Dr Helen Czerski. The third, by Dr Tara Shine, on the atmosphere, with an Irish accent ('warming' as 'worming').
The final section introduced 'greenhouse gases' as though the expression is accurate (not much glass in the atmosphere...) and assumed carbon dioxide causes heating. Incidentally, the enormous contribution of China to CO2 was ignored—I wondered if Tara Shine blushed slightly. I'd guess from the name she thinks she's a Jew—it's exquisitely amusing that simple believers should be presented as scientists. The odd fact that oil, taken from underground, then burnt, on the face of it an immense sink of oxygen, isn't mentioned, itself deserves a mention. Underground strata which once held oil don't seem to be 'sexy'. The spare CO2, in its tiny percentage form, must help plants (and the tiny creatures, of collective vast biomass, which photosynthesise). A possibly Muslim woman seemed to think electrolysis of water might be helpful, though the vast volumes, their explosive nature, and the huge amount of hardware doesn't sound very unpolluting to me. I don't think anyone mentioned 'nuclear power': this is in a state of phased retirement, so the Jewish frauds can hold on to their loot—see the insane cost of 'nuclear power' and other articles in nukelies.org . Another non-mention was I think power stations in South Africa, in very serious difficulties: they can't get the staff, the supposed customers don't pay, that sort of thing. Still, the audience all thought they knew what 'batteries' are.
Here's an article on my site from a real scientist on Global Warming: Fact or Fiction? which (believe it or not) was recorded by me 25 years ago at Kew Gardens in south-west London.
RW 30 December 2020