Suffragette DVD 2015.
UK (Jewish Channel 4 tv) & National Lottery
SARAH GAVRON director I'd wanted to do a film about the suffragettes for years. Here were a group of women, fighting inequality, turning to acts of civil disobedience to achieve it...
There's always a responsibility in making a film about real events ... we did a huge amount of research and we had lots of historical consultants on board [This amused and disgusted me; Jews lie about anything they can make money from. Consider all the wars in the 20th century.]
We had a great visual effects team...
ABI MORGAN scriptwriter. The thing that actually amazed me was when Sarah Gavron, the director, gave me the material
I just didn't realize how contemporary these women's voices were going to sound and how vivid and relevant their issues were!
I really didn't want to write a biopic [she rhymed this with myopic, oddly]
FAYE WARD producer.
[Judging from the DVD commentary, all the work on filming and construction and green screen/CGI is done by others, presumably regarded as techies, and (I'd guess) paid in a minimalist way. On CGI, think of the faked crowds inserted into static images of Saddam Hussein. The 'National Lottery' and other sources—Channel 4 in the UK is Jewish-run—are arranged by the producer]
Parts were filmed (we're told) for first time 'in centuries' in the Houses of Parliament.
This film (movie? DVD?) is unusual in getting only 4-star reviews, even from the universal fellow-traveller 'news' sources. Though Double quotes from an anonymous source says it's the “THE BEST FILM OF THE YEAR”. Well, it worked—I picked it from a clutch of old DVDS.
The 'suffragette' of the title is a composite figure drawn from notes and comments, and experts, all of whom appear to be women. Much of this information is from the 'Audio Commentary by Director Sarah Gavron and Screenwriter Abi Morgan'.
The period of c. 1900 to the First World War is of great interest for its part in the modern world. There were:–
- The slow choking-off of 'Jews' from western Russia moving from their slums and Shtetls and Kahals into white countries and locations, such as London.
- The Jewish desire for war, partly by simple violent Jews (think 'Jack the Ripper'). And by secretive practised rich cosmopolitan world-wide Jew desire for money through debt and goy deaths.
- 'Votes for women' was a part of the push for so-called 'democracy', which was clearly a fraud. In the words of H G Wells: i... campaign ... ended abruptly with the Declaration of War in 1914... the window-smashing, the burning of country houses, churches [not synagogues!] ... the Vote was flung to women simply to keep them quiet ... the only traceable consequence has been the further enfeeblement of the waning powers of Democracy.
- The issue of violence. The 'suffragists' were the first activists for women's votes, but under Jewish influence are virtually unknown today.
- The subtext was always that Jews should not fight in person, but should get others to fight. Because of the distributed nature of Jewish power, and its secret connectivity, this has so far been astonishingly successful.
- The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was perhaps the most important non-obvious hard power fact of the time.
- The fairly sudden rise of printed mass media (radio, film, TV came later) because of easier papermaking and printing and mail delivery etc. It's an astonishing story. And to this day people study their junk press, junk books, and films like Suffragette with terrifying indiscrimination.
- The issue of sex. That feminism had anything to do with sexual health and happiness, was repudiated by these ladies with flushed indignation so soon as the suggestion was made plain to them.
- The issue of education and skills. Amusingly, and unsurprisingly, this film avoids such things with the practised skill of thorough hypocrites. Should maltreated women design their own sanitary steam laundries? Should they design better housing, or better horse-drawn devices, or better child-care arrangements?
- Wartime deaths were wanted by Jews, and (more arguably) by aristocrats, many of whom were Jewified, while some looked with concern on population figures.
Of the various characters, we might select
Emmeline Pankhurst, played by Meryl Streep, who can't manage an English or Manchester accent. Presumably she was picked to rouse American audiences from their slumbers. This film and commentary (of course) sticks to the convention of not mentioning Jews. I think Pankhurst was, and this was the source of her war fever—she went round speaking in favour of war.
Emily Davison. Accounts of the time say she was fanatically devoted to a cause; no prizes for guessing what. Or for guessing how she was portrayed. They tried to show her horse-race death, including lots of cameras (when in fact only one blurred photo was published). (Natalie Press at about 1:24).
I see
Dame Ethyl Smythe's
March of the Women was worked in. Smythe, a composerr, was compared with Bach by an incautious commentator.
Inspector Arthur Steed was a composite character, acted by Brendon Gleeson, shown with his new tricks, including portable cameras. This was a time when Jews committed a lot of crime, but the Steed chap knows nothing about that. Probably Irish Garda now, resemble the character in taking no action at the invasion of Ireland.
Edith Ellyn appears to have been a real person—hard to tell with trash like Wikipedia around. It is a fact that dynamite, relatively new at the time, was used in some atrocities, with anonymous notes 'Vote for Women' left lying around. Whether people like Ellyn really did this, is another matter. Very reminiscent of 'Black Lives Matter' other Jewish-funded phoney movements. Here's a
debate with a Jew called Webb, who calls himself a 'historian'—judge for yourself.
Don't take the stories of women being chucked out seriously, at least without careful checking. Jews secretly funded such things as violence against protestors who disliked the Boer Wars, for example. Same story about WW2, Vietnam War, and so on.
At this point, I have something like Jew fatigue and Critics Elbow, and will stop. But
please don't imagine you'll get the full story from people with a very long history of lying! And watch for half-truths: a man I vaguely know thinks ordinary women were the cause of the Great War, and I can't dissuade him.
But remember that the slow appreciation of Jewish influence is growing, and this may be the greatest change in human beliefs for thousands of years.
© Raeto West 1 September 2024