Paul Ehrlich: The Population Bomb
Paul Ralph Ehrlich (born 1932). The Population Bomb was first published in May 1968; I haven't got information on further editions, different English-speaking countries, or translations.Here are some notes on the hidden background details. Which after many years have come into focus.
Malthus Malthus was and is widely regarded as a great thinker and philosopher; see for example his gravestone in Bath Abbey. His human population model based on food supply restrictions is well-known.
I understood the Jewish view on reading E J Hobsbawm's Age of Revolution which purports to deal with 1789-1848. Hobsbawm deems Malthus 'neither as original nor as compelling as its supporters claimed'. Hobsbawm doesn't think in terms of crowding or overpopulation or deaths, but financially. I realised later that Hobsbawm was part of the mainstream of Judaism which controlled and controlled populations by war. Obviously Jews can't announce this, unless they dominate. So that is their alternative version of Malthus. Malthus's Essay was published anonymously in 1798, and I'd guess well-received by Jews, since the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars had brought considerable numbers of deaths, needing some distraction. Malthus was a Church of England Reverend and may, in my view, have been aware of a Jewish connection.
Other authors and journalists and commentators worked on the subject (arguably including Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace), for example Bertrand Russell, who lectured on Can A Scientific Society Be Stable? in 1949. Note that Russell took a nationalistic view; he thought populations would stay where they were. It's only with increases in ease of travel (roads, rail, ships, air...) that Jews got the idea of population replacement.
Paul Ehrlich's Population Bomb is quite short and unreferenced; a simple paperback with a bright cover and not many chapters. It must have been part of the backwash from America's invasion of Vietnam, at a time when Americans were even more gullible than they are now. The Jewish publicity machine must have got to work on it, plus related stuff in things like The Reader's Digest and Time/Life and National Geographic and endless TV junk. Chemical warfare in Vietnam was elided away by movements which still drag on—climate, environmentalism, extinction, ecology—and the moon landing fraud came along within a year or so.
Over-Population as a 'Bourgeois Myth' It's essential to understand the the Jewish view of all this. With blithe self-absorption, which looks like self-confidence, they saw the political possibilities, which boiled down to getting rid of whites, as they did so successfully in the Second World War. Americans from birth were 'brainwashed' to believe in 'the Great Generation', the 'Good War', American individualism, the 'Boomers', educational excellence, American democracy, and what's sometimes called a 'raft' of ideas.
Unfortunately Jews seem driven by instinct to cause harm and damage, as witness the Hart-Cellar Act of 1965. This was analysed by Kevin MacDonald more than 30 years later.
I remember at Leicester University in 1967 or 1968 talking with a seated activist type, anxious to collect money to promote immigration into Britain. I was rather amazed that anyone could take such a firm view on an issue with far-reaching consequences, reaching probably centuries into the future. In my naivete I simply didn't know that Jews have a habit of taking instructions from primitive bearded fanatics.
I first heard the expression 'over-population is a bourgeois myth' in about 1970. I now think this was a Jewish meme, the idea being to defuse legitimate concerns, and of course being 'Marxist' or 'Communist', jewish-inspired.
Intelligence, IQ, and the use of 'General Intelligence Factor' g Something easy to miss in the screeches over these issues is the belief in 'g', a general intelligence factor. The Jewish point here is their extreme secrecy and cult of lying, renewed each year in a ceremony, and clannish exclusionary behaviour, which is distributed in clumps world-wide.
Many people know nothing of this, and the media, education, and general information dispersion are designed to reinforce this. So it's absurd to regard people who know nothing of it as 'intelligent'. The bottom line is that 'g' refers to technical or empirical matters, with Jews huddling over their own intelligence. This seems very dangerous; there are millions and millions of Jews of no great ability who spend their lives on lies. The 'COVID' fraud is an example of the dangers.
A Nation of Immigrants?: A Brief Demographic History of Britain - by David Conway
5 stars - Solid shortish book on population movements into Britain, designed to oppose errors
December 8, 2010 -Removed from Amazon.co.uk
Conway clarifies at the start that the 'nation of immigrants' claim presumably is the claim that a majority of people in Britain are descended from immigrants who entered Britain at some stage, when Britain existed - i.e. not the mists of prehistory.
British history is split into five time zones - up to the Roman Conquest (and its fall)/ Up to the Norman Conquest in 1066/ then to the Reformation/ then to Second World War/ finally, 1945 to the present - publication was in 2007.
He's picked these dates because they represent various types of immigration:
* Up to the Roman Conquest - the view now is that agriculture replaced hunter/gatherer life by diffusion, not invasion. Then of course 'Romans' invaded, tho these were mostly Belgae etc. So his first interval includes the Romans.
* There were Angles, Saxons and so on, and Vikings. And some Jews. Conway adduces evidence that the numbers weren't large.
Throughout there is evidence from DNA studies, some on bones a thousand or more years ago. B Sykes and S Oppenheimer are cited here. The Reformation introduced religious refugees, Protestants mostly. These included the Huguenots, whom Conway praises as does almost everyone.
* Up to the Second World War there were Jews round about 1890. Alien Act 1905. And Alien Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919. Their numbers however were dwarfed by the Irish. Conway is good on the reasons for England allying with Scotland, then Ireland - defensive measures against France.
* After the Second World War. Conway quotes official figures illustrating the 'staggering growth', mostly in England. He subdivides the period: 1945-1948 (including Poles left from WW2; and Ukrainians - I met an 82-year old Ukrainian woman who bemoaned men she knew from the next village getting married in UK bigamously); 1948-1971 1948 British Nationality Act (under Attlee, Labour) 'extended a right to them all [i.e. Indians and Pakistanis], even after independence' 1969 Commonwealth Appeals Act p 76; 1971-1997 1971 Immigration Act and 'patriality' (p 76) and where the EU had a problem with the eastern borders when the USSR failed, and 1997 is the start of Tony Blair's disastrously dogmatic 'New Labour' regime; 1997 - present includes the further unfolding of chain immigration, arranged marriages, fake asylum, fake students, movement of labour, and all the rest. [1981 Nationality Act changed legal meaning of 'British' - under Labour]
Conway identifies some influential publications and people:--
* 1996 'Commission for Racial Equality': 'Roots of the Future: Ethnic Diversity in the Making of Britain'. Conway says in effect this was propaganda rubbish promoting the lie of a 'mongrel nation'.
* 2000 Barbara Roche speech on 'UK migration in a global economy'. Conway says this was the start of the odd idea that unskilled illiterates were valuable to the economy and would 'pay our pensions'.
* 2004, R Winder, 'Bloody Foreigners: The Story of Immigration to Britain'. Conway, here implies this book is simple propaganda, aimed at an increasingly annoyed white populace.
* 2006 B Sykes and S Oppenheimer publish, says Conway, books with very similar accounts of results of DNA research into Britons, showing small penetration even by Angles and Saxons who were supposed to have invaded en masse.
This book needs to be read several times over, to get the feel for the way politicians have slanted and lied about the issues. 'The relatively high level of social harmony Britain has enjoyed results from the fact that earlier waves of immigrants ... had to adapt... Now our culture, and our nation, are in danger of fragmenting...' Conway doesn't tackle, or I think mention, the possible real differences in races - for example the lack of achievements by Africans.
Roy Beck I think is Australian, and his presentation is not about Malthusian high populations, but is on moving populations into white countries. Beck says that the moveable numbers are too small to make any substantial difference to those countries. Beck does not say that Jews want to move people anyway, with the object of replacing whites.
Here's the Gumballs video in mp4 format.
Why Facts and Figures are Kept Secret Such things as cost of housing, ownership of housing (typically Jewish), amounts spent on money support, health, education, legal stuff, unemployment, tend to be secret. And n ever referred to in the Jewish-controlled media. In the UK, if housing shortages are discussed, immigration figures are never mentioned. In annual budgets, the costs of borrowing from Jews to pay for these things are not mentioned.
Uploaded 12 August 2021. By Rae West.