Review of Jewish interest ww2 Patrick J. Buchanan: Churchill, Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World
Half-way piece of revisionism designed to conceal part of the truth, July 11, 2010
Interesting book and incidentally not as bulky as it's made to appear—large typeface in the text and huge bibliography see to that.
28 Feb 2021: I'm listening to a 55 minute audio on Andrew Carrington Hitchcock's Internet radio site. A 48 minute monologue by Dr Peter Hammond, a laughably gullible Christian. The episode is saved on https://big-lies.org/media/2021-02-25-ACH1459-Hammond-on-WW2.mp3 which is part of this site. Its title was The Real History You Can Find In Patrick Buchanan “Churchill, Hitler And The Unnecessary War” on February 25, 2021.
Hammond makes no mention of Jewish money and Jewish interests, including killing non-Jews, collecting assets of all types, and propagandising Jewish lies. And seems to have no idea about Churchill's Jewishness and the support for Stalin and Jews in Russia. Nor of the support by Jews for Hitler, to establish the next war. Fascinating to listen to Hammond, who is utterly simple. Re-examination of Churchill's 'errors', to check how they fall into place with Jewish plans, isn't mentioned by Hammond.
Hitchcock offered no critique whatever. He promoted Hammond's websites on aspects of Christianity. And Hammond's 890 sermons.
*The conclusion is that Hitchcock is just another propagandist for Jewish interests. Disappointing; but there it is.*
I don't think there's anything new here; however the fact that it's published by a large publisher (part of Random House) I suspect marks a milestone. The post-WW2 German deaths are a relatively new mainstream topic, having been censored for about fifty years. The First World War material, in particular the secret agreement with France, is well-known, as are the effects of Versailles—self-determination unless you're German. Buchanan is (I think) unusual in considering the British planners of war reluctant; he misses out the gung-ho feeling of the time though a bit inconsistently he is sound on the vicious anti-German feeling promoted about 1940. Buchanan has done a half-decent job, literally, in looking at the results of war; I suppose at the simplest level you need a feeling for assets, before and after; populations, before and after; and the way these were changed. What's missing from Buchanan is the entire Jewish element. For example Buchanan deplores Leninism, Fascism, Stalinism, Communism without noting 3 of 4 were Jewish. And he says nothing about finance and the issue of paper money which of course became more important when the gold standard was abandoned. He accepts the myth of the 'holocaust' though he's quite good on e.g. Saddam Hussein's relative lack of power.
This looks like a history book. Really though it's a sign of a change of policy. For fifty years or so there's been a behind-the-scenes promotion of immigration into the USA and Europe. I say behind the scenes because there is no one promoter or inventor of it. There's no source, just a groundswell, which of course has to come from somewhere. In my view the people who have promoted the policy are having second thoughts. And about time too, in fact. However there isn't anything in this book to suggest Buchanan understands or will humanise US policy. The Vietnam War and other US atrocities isn't even indexed. Four stars because it's a signpost, not because it's good.
More on 2021: My site has supported Hexzane527 probably French, who looks at Hitler's "mistakes" and interprets them as evidence of Jewish policies. Buchanan (who apparently was a speechwriter for Ronald Reagan) does not look at Churchill's "mistakes" as evidence for covert Jew activity (though he lists some). I don't know anyone who has done this, in defiance of the absurd Churchill cult in the Jewish junk media.
Rae West 2010 & 2021