Review of
Shallow Jewish view of a nasty issue Susan Brownmiller: Against Our Will - Men, Women and Rape
Jewish-American Attitudes to Rape 15 March 20131975 book which seems to have been reprinted forever after. 450 pages in my paperback version; acknowledgements, sources, long index, and with endnotes. Author was about 40 when this was published.
I don't think any reviews have drawn attention to the specific Jewish biases, which are such a depressingly characteristic part of post-1945 American semi-academic life. So I'll do it here.
Presumably, every single person on earth has ancestors who were raped. For that matter, everyone must have female ancestors who would have preferred someone else; and ditto males. I've sometimes wondered if smaller females are an evolutionary by-product; perhaps races of strong women may have selectively been squeezed out?
Brownmiller (whose parents were New York 'Jews'; Braunmuller a name given by Germans?) is not strong on biology. Her book is rather scrappy, anecdotal, and under-researched. Her writing style is reminiscent of Naomi Woolf: anything vaguely relevant is shoehorned in. She says she 'researched' for four years, largely in New York's public library. Though she clearly limited her own research times.
Part of her Jewish bias is shown in her topics: she has little idea about anthropology, tending to quote fairy stories (Little Red Riding Hood is in there), and stories glorifying rapists, which she seems to think are universal. She doesn't give many examples, probably to avoid stories by Jews glorifying rape of non-Jews, for example in Germany in 1945: not having a Jewish supremacist race background, all I could think of is Old Testament stories; and maybe Jupiter reshaping himself for Leda. Jack the Ripper gets a few pages: several people she quotes are claimed by her to have described him as a 'hero'. She doesn't mention the likelihood he was a Jew immigrated into east London. She includes bits from Freud, the unloved author of much unlovely material, which Jews seem to think they are obligated to mention. Naturally, penises figure largely: Brownmiller seems to think men had to be tamed at some point in history; the obvious fact that no society could survive unless children were supported for ten years or so, at the minimum, escapes her. A typical quotation is: From the earliest times, when men of one tribe freely raped women of another tribe to secure new wives...—when of course there is simply no evidence about 'the earliest times'. The oddest Freudian-style idea, possibly not in this book, is that rape isn't about sex at all, but is a way to control or demean women; the Guardian, an absurd British newspaper in its Jewish way maintains this, incredibly.
There's quite a bit on war, mostly 20th century. She recounts German war atrocities in Belgium. These were reported in 1917 (her endnotes give this date). She doesn't seem to know the Bryce Report (1915) was published by the British in 1915, and in about twenty languages. This of course was propaganda to keep people fighting: the British joined up with great enthusiasm (at least according to newspapers and newsreel media) in 1914, but when many failed to return, they had to be forced by conscription and propaganda. Brownmiller doesn't mention the Balfour Declaration to get President Wilson into the war. Hence of course the 1917 stories. The British government made some sort of apology after the war to Germany; I don't know about the USA, but, since the Fed, and Baruch, had in effect been dictator of the USA after about 1916 I'd guess not.
The Second World War is treated from a purely Jewish propaganda viewpoint: the word 'Holocaust' is not yet used, but Germans are blamed for mass rapes. The truth—rapes of Russian women before WW2, and rapes of central and east European women, notably German, but in all Jewish-controlled countries, go virtually unmentioned. Solzhenitsyn gets a single mention, but not his long poem on WW2. Deir Yassin is unmentioned; so are Jews held in German camps, let out to rape German women., as boasted by the multiple liar 'Wiesel'.
I suspect this book was driven largely by the Vietnam War; accounts from this occur near the beginning of Brownmiller's book. At the time she was working on her book (say, 1970-1975) this war was coming to an end; the USA had almost 25 years in the far east, Jews having made money from control of paper money and from weaponry—helicopters, bombs, rifles, rounds, experimental explosives, napalm, ships, shells, airplanes, chemical warfare, building contracts, and so on, mostly under Kissinger, one of the most repulsive members of the most repulsive group ever to have power in our planet. What they wanted was an exit strategy—the phasing out process to avoid enquiries, blame, and, in particular, examination of the racket aspect.
Whether consciously or not, Brownmiller is part of this process, making no attempt to attach blame at source. Her whole attitude, that rape is universal and constant and part of human life for as long as human beings existed, of course helps that process—if it always happens, why blame LBJ or Kissinger?. I won't quote examples (there are some in the Russell Tribunal, on this site and elsewhere). She tends to pick shooting and mass murder incidents, as I suppose these are more shocking than rapes, where there were helicopter landings, then presumably a translator to tell villagers to line up girls to be raped.
Brownmiller is unfair on male victims here, though admittedly it's a different issue. Traditionally, males were expected to be killed in wars, and many must have found the possibility terrifying, and unfair. I'd guess most Americans, brainwashed by the Jewish media since birth, simply had no idea they were being used: their role was to make money for Jews, and preferably also die to free up real estate. Worth remembering that Vietnam (about the size of New Mexico) had more bombs dropped on it than were used in the whole Second World War). There was (I believe) quite an amount of fragging of officers.
Brownmiller has speculative material on the US Civil War, red Indians, and for example Bangla Desh. She has no idea that the Quran specifically allows/recommends rape, which gives an idea of the shallowness of her work. She mentions pogroms, now of course known to be almost entirely fabricated by 'Jews' so host countries would take them in.
As is a staple at present of Jews, she pretends races don't exist, apart from Jews of course. The far higher rate of black on white rapes to the other way round (40 times is often quoted; 40,000 white women in the USA per year—to be fair, this is not a huge proportion of women there) gets no mention; just the faux Jewish NAACP-style sympathy, designed of course to be anti-white.
There are other issues: false claims, no doubt a lawyer-induced money-making scam. Nothing on technical change—there's more mobility than ever in human history, with cars and air travel. Nothing on what in effect is rape within closed societies, notably Muslim: women can be kept in fear easily enough. Brownmiller mentions, in a very minor way, that there have been death penalties for rape; she instances some in England. In some Arab desert countries, anyone attacking women going to wells for water were killed; Genghis Khan is reported to have had the death penalty for adultery, and therefore presumably rape, among his followers.
It's sad that sound books on this topic seem unavailable; or perhaps wouldn't sell. Brownmiller in effect says, men, hairy and savage, have always been like that so there's nothing much we can do. The final chapter, WOMEN FIGHT BACK, is just verbose inconclusivity.
NOTE: Jewish attacks are usually partial, typically omitting Jewish practices. A good example is Andrea Dworkin who in theory campaigned against pornography. But she never mentioned that Jews control pornography, and Jewish child sex and rape policies.