[NUKELIES]

You are a racist. You are an anti-Semite. You are a terrorist.

The United States has become the same as Soviet Russia. You cannot say or do anything without fear of being told on. England is even worse. Socialism is a failure for the people even if it is a success for the rich.

White males are the new underclass. We are cowed into silent apologetic submission to the non-white masses who are our new masters. We are guilty. Bow down to the Spirit of Mediocrity because it is your new God. Surrender to the raceless bureaucracy which guards the gates of freedom. Die the death you deserve for being unequal.

[ewing2001]

...it is actually *worse. Our world is now completely Orwellianized, which increased after 2001. Specific transhumanist fascists -turning into bionic fascists mapping out coOpted activists in socNetworks, not linked to any specific culture, having actors in charge "playing politicians" incl. realityTV-Media- "gigs" as in Merkel visiting China and "pleading" for monetary assistance or fake candidates in the USA on behalf of Gingrich vs. Romney pretending democracy is still alive, while one of the biggest lies in history, the alleged nuclear bomb [plus follow-up phony nuclear technology, nuclear medicine etc...] are still circulating for constructed mass anxieties in the brain of mass sheeple. Not even the ridicule of all this was yet publicized yet.

I am starting to post in google-translated russian at https://upravlenie.ucoz.ru/forum/2-586-1#19516 .
I will do this only for a while. I consider Orwellianized words as in change, hope, truth and luck as completely corrupted, coOpted and therefore dead.

There are instead only "opportunities|opportunismo" , as in "exploiting the prevailing circumstances or opportunities to gain immediate advantage for oneself or one's own [group]", or not to be confused as a "hangout-freethinker", better speaking with ob portus ("toward the harbour/entrance") ;

Maybe there *is positive chaos and an opportunity for enlightment, who knows ;

regards and respectfully ;

[rerevisionist]

I'm not sure. A lot of posters in political sites (for example, https://www.thebritishresistance.co.uk ) think there's now 'racism fatigue' and the conditioning effects are falling away. It's happened in the past - 'atheist' used to convey a sort of horrified terror and disgust, and I think a bit of this remains in parts of the USA, but otherwise it takes a lot of imaginative effort to conjure up that emotion now.

[FirstClassSkeptic]

The racists are the ones who are right. The racists correctly predicted what would happen in Rhodesia and in South Africa under black rule. The racists were exactly correct in their assessments, and the egalitarians were predictably incorrect.

[rerevisionist]

Primitive Warfare

... one consequence of the triumph of the Boasians [i.e. followers of Franz Boas, a Jewish 'intellectual' whose life work was to pretend races don't exist or differ] was that there was almost no research on warfare and violence among the peoples studied by anthropologists (Keegan 1993, 90-94). Warfare and warriors were ignored, and cultures were conceived as consisting of myth-makers and gift-givers. (Orans [1996, 120] shows that [Margaret] Mead systematically ignored cases of rape, violence, revolution and competition in her accounts of Samoa,) Only five articles on the anthropology of war appeared during the 1950s. Revealingly, when Harry Turney-High published his volume, Primitive Warfare in 1949 documenting the universality of warfare and its oftentimes awesome savagery, the book was completely ignored by the anthropology profession - another example of the exclusionary tactics used against dissenters by the Boasians and characteristic of the other intellectual movements reviewed in this volume as well. Turney-High's massive data on non-Western peoples conflicted with the image of them favored by a highly politicized profession whose members simply excluded them entirely from intellectual discourse. The result was a "pacified past" (Keeley 1996, 163ff|) and an "attitude of self-reproach" (p. 179) in which the behavior of primitive peoples was bowdlerized while the behavior of European peoples was not only excoriated as uniquely evil but also as responsible for all extant examples of warfare among primitive peoples. ...

Page 29 of Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique.
Harry Holbert Turney-High's book is not listed in MacDonald's bibliography, which seems a bit strange. It occurs to me that, despite the huge number of US bases and personnel around the world, there are virtually no sociologists investigating their impact, behavior, or anything else. I wonder why that is...? Could it be related to the absence of sociological work about Jews?

[rerevisionist]

FirstClassSkeptic says in a South Africa thread that there's a slogan 'only whites can be racist' - obviously a Jewish thing. There are promotional things in Britain like this too, only they are more of the secretly-funded type rather than paid ads

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/02/only-whites-are-racist-in-duluth/

[NUKELIES]

We've got that same only whites can be racist bullshit here in New York City big time!

That poster of the white woman with writing all over her face is vile. The word entitled only applies to people to who believe that rights can be given. Right is seized and can never be given. Right is earned through conquest. It logically follows that if "White" Europeans were genuine conquerors of The Americas, Africa, India, Australia, Hong Kong, etc., then they are not entitled - they are dominant.

entitle |en'titl|
verb [ with obj. ] (usu. be entitled)
1 give (someone) a legal right or a just claim to receive or do something: employees are normally entitled to severance pay | [ with obj. and infinitive ] : the landlord is entitled to require references.
2 give (something, esp. a text or work of art) a particular title: an article entitled “The Harried Society.”
• [ with obj. and complement ] archaic give (someone) a specified title expressing their rank, office, or character: they entitled him Sultan.
ORIGIN late Middle English (formerly also as intitle): via Old French from late Latin intitulare, from in- ‘in’ + Latin titulus ‘title.’

Entitlement requires someone to do the entitling. Sovereigns are not subject to authority.

[rerevisionist]

https://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2012/01/zeru-zeru-ghosts-albino-medicine.html?utm_source=BP_recent

On murders of albino Africans by blacks (presumably) for body-parts. The actual details are, as seems inevitable these days, vague; the proportion of albinos isn't stated, but

figures released by the International Federation for the Red Cross and Crescent Societies (IFRCCS) showed that at least 44 albinos were known to have been killed in Tanzania and 14 in Burundi in the preceding year; actual figures may be much higher, as pretty much everyone seems tofear the witchdoctors and their legendary powers of retribution

Albino African black (according to kitmantv)

I wondered if the Red Cross is forced to associate with the Red Crescent - the latter are a Muslim agency and like Jews see no obligation to help others.

[FirstClassSkeptic]

The consensual history is that White man came to North America and took the land from the 'native Americans'. However, if you study indian warfare, you'll find that almost no indian was on what you could call their native or ancestral homeland. They had all fought each other and chased each other around so much, and took each other's land, until it's impossible to know where they started from.

And all of the oldest skeletal remains are of Caucasian. So who where the real 'native Americans'? According to the bones and the artifacts, the Europeans were here before the Asians.