Thanks for those links, FCS. There's a whole world of gold producers, dealers, traders, speculators, jewellery manufacturers, secure vault designers and builders, and people selling bonds for small people to hug assuming they are real gold, out there. The second of your links ('Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/21/2011') has these bullet points---
To sum up:
*** It is common practice for most Central Banks to hold part of their gold reserves overseas in ‘gold trading centres’ (read London and New York)
*** One of those Central Banks - that of Venezuela - wants its gold back
*** That means that a group of banks (mainly in the UK and the USA) who are supposed to have that gold in their vaults need to GIVE it back...
*** ...which in turn could potentially trigger a race to repatriate national gold holdings
*** Neither Fort Knox nor the Federal Reserve (the world’s two biggest gold depositories) have been independently audited in recent times
*** The status of the gold held in the Bundesbank (home to the world’s third-largest hoard) is somewhat unclear
*** The practice of leasing gold by Central Banks has been going on so long that it even predates the time when Alan Greenspan advocated sound money
*** The gold ‘physical market’ is approximately 100 times the size of the amount of actual underlying metal by which it is purportedly backed
*** The top four bullion banks, or ‘commercials’ on the COMEX continue to run what we shall politely call ‘significant’ short positions (chart above)
In the three trading sessions since Chavez made his announcement on August 17th, gold has added almost $100, coming within a whisker of $1,900 before settling back at another record weekly close.
There's quite a good comment, by 'Popo' which I'd say is a half-truth:---
To say that the dollar is backed by "nothing" is really just ignorance. The US petrodollar empire is based on control of the oil trade (among other markets) which in turn is defended by: the most powerful military in the history of the world, an intricate network of military bases (not coincidentally clustered in the oil producing region of the world) and various well-armed proxy states. (Also non-coincidentally located in the oil producing region of the world).
The dollar is a measurement of power. And that power is used to control the world's energy supply. (It's amazing that most people don't know this... as if 3 simultaneous wars aren't enough evidence). The power of the US *is* unquestionably in decline. And it is most definitely being challenged, slowly but surely by rising powers. But to suggest that the petrodollar empire is dead, or is nothing but a paper-tiger would be idiotic.
And by the way -- THE REAL REASON CHAVEZ IS BRINGING HIS GOLD HOME is not because he's worried about the banking system. He's worried that he's the next Libya. As US power wanes, the US will become increasingly militarized in an effort to seize all the world's oil. Chavez watched in horror as Qadaffi's international accounts were cut off. Qadaffi *could* have held off indefinitely if he'd had the capital to arm himself well. (He could have made the US and Europe pay an *extremely* high price for their aggression). But because Qadaffi's financial capacity was kneecapped -- Qadaffi is going to lose. [NB - I've heard Libya had huge gold stores - so Popo's account may not be accurate - rerev.]
Chavez will not make the same mistake.
The Venezuelan re-patriation of gold has nothing to do with this "Is there any gold in Fort Knox" silliness, and everything to do with the fact that Chavez knows he's next.
It's true that paper money is sounder than the erratic and accidental and theft-prone system of gold -
PROVIDED the backing is reliable and trustworthy. Popo sees US bases etc - but assessing military power isn't that simple. The fact they have relied on the myth of nukes, and the fact they continually lie, and the fact that prolonged wars continue, and the fact that quasi-military strategies like forced immigration exist, etc suggest military power has severe limitations. And also Popo is ignoring the possibility of printing unlimited 'money' - and if a system is insecure, it may well think it has nothing to lose by risking its own currency.