Poll : family rank and revolutionary thinking

Ramifications of nuclear issues are everywhere: subjects loosely or remotely linked to the nuclear bomb myth

Poll : family rank and revolutionary thinking

Postby voerioc » 07 Feb 2012 09:37

Since a long time, I have thought that second or third borns are more revolutionary than first borns. This is what Frank Sulloway also thinks (probably a jew. But I already thought that years before reading him).

So, as we are between revolutionary people here, we have little basis to verify if this theory is true. So if you want to participate to this poll, let's give us your family rank (and the sex of your siblings. I think it's important too).

Personally, I am the third born of a family of three boys.

PS : good idea from rerevisionist. As it is a personal thing, you can give me the answer by PM if you want.
Last edited by voerioc on 07 Feb 2012 18:22, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
voerioc
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 30 Mar 2011 08:29

Re: Poll : family rank and revolutionary thinking

Postby rerevisionist » 07 Feb 2012 18:00

I'll tell you by private message!

(I don't count myself as 'revolutionary' - this is a Jewish construct pretending that Jewish takeovers by criminals, useful idiots, hirelings and the rest are 'revolutions').
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Poll : family rank and revolutionary thinking

Postby voerioc » 07 Feb 2012 19:04

Maybe I didn't use the right word then. By revolutionary people, I mean more people who are open to new ideas or people who bring new ideas, than people who make revolutions like the Soviet revolution.
User avatar
voerioc
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 30 Mar 2011 08:29

Re: Poll : family rank and revolutionary thinking

Postby rerevisionist » 07 Feb 2012 19:37

Voerioc - for God's sake. The 'Soviet revolution' was a coup d'etat by Jews. They pretend it was a revolution. Very probably the 'French Revolution' was similar. And the 1848 'revolutions' - it's yet another taboo topic.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Poll : family rank and revolutionary thinking

Postby voerioc » 07 Feb 2012 20:06

Yes, I know that of course. But I was using the word with the conventional meaning without any reference to jews. It is not because jews have made all the faked revolutions since at least 1600, that we can't use the term "revolution". For me, the term "revolution" or "revolutionary people" is not necessarily linked to jews. You can talk about the industrial revolution, or a scientific revolution. For me for example, talking about nuke lies is a kind of scientific revolution.
User avatar
voerioc
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 30 Mar 2011 08:29


Re: Poll : family rank and revolutionary thinking

Postby rerevisionist » 26 Feb 2012 17:08

@ FCS - wtf has a Dr Pepper TV ad to do with family rank and being critical/ intelligent??
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Poll : family rank and revolutionary thinking

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 26 Feb 2012 18:21

rerevisionist wrote:@ FCS - wtf has a Dr Pepper TV ad to do with family rank and being critical/ intelligent??


What's the matter? Too deep for you?

"I drink Dr Pepper, and I'm proud,
I used to be alone in a crowd."

Don't you feel alone in a crowd?

Dr Pepper commercials were about breaking out of the Pepsi/CocaCola crowd, and being different, original. Crass mercantile-ism, but it was just something that came to mind while reading the original post.
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Return to Other Revisionisms, Hyper-Revisionisms & Off-Topic Debates


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest