Chernobyl at 25

Dumploads? Covert uses? Radiation? Submarines? Chernobyl, Fukushima &c. Coal, oil, wind, solar. Electric grids

Chernobyl at 25

NBC AND ABC ADMIT REACTOR FILM WAS HOAX By HERBERT MITGANG MAY 15, 1986

View page in [New York] TimesMachine   May 15, 1986, Page 00025

ABC News and NBC News said last night that film footage the networks aired on Monday night, described as exclusive film of a smoking Chernobyl nuclear reactor, was a hoax. They acknowledged that the footage, sold to them by an Italian photo agency named Albatross, actually showed a cement factory and hospital in Trieste, Italy.

On NBC's ''Nightly News'' yesterday, Tom Brokaw said: ''Monday we showed a videotape of what we were led to believe was the Chernobyl nuclear plant. It was disputed in Italy. We investigated that and found, in fact, that it was in Trieste. We were had.''

On ABC's ''World News Tonight,'' which had defended its use of the faked footage on Tuesday, Peter Jennings said yesterday: ''We can sum it up fairly quickly. We, and others, were the victims of fraud. We were badly misled, and we misled you.''

Howard Stringer, executive vice president of CBS News, which did not use the film, said: ''We were initially concerned because we didn't have it. Then when we saw it on the air, it was not very revealing.'' Italian Network Was Suspicious

The film footage was said to show the Chernobyl nuclear reactor and other buildings shrouded in smoke the day after the explosion, and was said to have been secreted out of the Soviet Union by a Yugoslav tourist.

Giuseppe Rugato, a correspondent in New York for RAI, the Italian television network, said that RAI's broadcast on Tuesday night compared ''the fake and the real thing and found that the so-called Chernobyl pictures used by NBC and ABC were phony.

''It's something incredible,'' Mr. Rugato said. ''RAI had nothing to do with the sale to NBC and ABC. We did show a few seconds Tuesday morning that were distributed by the European Broadcasting Union, in a normal exchange of pictures. But RAI's people in Trieste found out that the pictures were fakes. They were really pictures of a cement factory and the Cattinari Hospital in Trieste. RAI also had other evidence that the pictures were fakes. The lake shown in the footage was not in Chernobyl but is a water reservoir in Trieste. There were hills shown - Trieste hills. There are no hills in Chernobyl.''

On its broadcast out of Rome Tuesday night, RAI's anchor said: ''The smoke in the pictures was supposed to be smoke coming out of the Chernobyl plant. In reality, the Yugoslavs sold smoke to the American networks. This was a 'sting' discovered by chance that ended badly.''

NBC News and ABC News together had agreed to pay Albatross - which had asked $100,000 - $11,000 for the footage. No checks have been forwarded to the photo agency, according to the two networks. The day after the film was sold to the NBC and ABC, Albatross offered to sell it to CBS News at a reduced price -$7,000. The offer was refused. Correction: June 9, 1986

Unsurprising incident. It's not stated whether the 'Albatross' Agency was Jewish.

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 26 Apr 2011 00:48

Chernobyl at 25: Nuclear Site Still Hot

A fire and explosion ripped through the Chernobyl nuclear power plant 25 years ago. The disaster is being marked by photos and interviews in what is now.


https://www.mail.com/video/topvideos/368 ... age-set1-4

This is a video, and i didn't watch it, so you can watch it, and tell me what it shows.
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Re: Chernobyl at 25

Postby rerevisionist » 26 Apr 2011 15:47

95% of that video is flashbacks and interviews with a few photographers of the time. (One is shown, in 1985, wearing a facemask!, taking his photos near the 'deadly radiation'). The last 5% shows a yellow radioactivity symbol, and a man also in a facemask holding up a red handheld device, with a hissing noise - no indication of what it's supposed to be measuring. No photos of vegetation however. The wrecked concrete rectangular thing is the star. (Six years before the official fall of the Soviet Union).
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Chernobyl at 25

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 16 Aug 2011 14:00

rerevisionist wrote: The wrecked concrete rectangular thing is the star. (Six years before the official fall of the Soviet Union).


This gives me a thought:

If you are the in power Elite, and you fear that there's going to be social or economic breakdown, you might worry that some of your secrets might be revealed.

What happens when you can't afford to pay the guards to guard the nuclear plant because of economic chaos? Well, the general public might start going into the plant looking for something to loot, and discover that there's no reactor core in there like you might expect. In order to prevent this from occurring, you might go and destroy the plant before the social breakdown occurs.

That makes me wonder. In Japan, they've been in recession for twenty years. Their debt is worse than the USA. So maybe they're going the way of Russia, so they destroy their reactors. Germany is going to go broke funding the EU.

Is destroying or shutting down nuclear power stations a sign that the power elite in that nation fear that the 'handwriting is on the wall' for that nation?
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Re: Chernobyl at 25

Postby rerevisionist » 17 Aug 2011 10:29

Hm. Some things - records, files - are quite easy to destroy. But big installations are different. You could well be right that destroying fake 'nuclear power stations' is the large-scale equivalent of shredding records. The WTC7 portion of 9/11 after all was to destroy records. Maybe it's time for 'unexpected' explosions at some big NASA sites. (And the CIA?)
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Chernobyl at 25

Postby NUKELIES » 20 Aug 2011 12:37

It's so depressing to realize that NASA has been a colossal hoax. It seemed such a beautiful thing when I was growing up, and was something for America to be proud of. Now it turns out it was the biggest money laundering operation ever. :cry:
User avatar
NUKELIES
Site Admin
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 17 Mar 2011 15:53
Location: UK/USA

Return to Nuclear Power Doubts: Nuclear Disasters? Safe Power? Is 'Nuclear Power' a Hoax?


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest