[NUKELIES]

Here is the real core issue: Central Banks. It's not money that is the root of all evil, it's usury.

Following is a most important article showing that supposedly Rothschild-owned central banks have been set up in all but three of the world's countries: Cuba, North Korea, and Iran:

Source: https://mikephilbin.blogspot.com/2011/11 ... n-all.html

Rothschild-owned Central Banks in ALL BUT THREE countries in 2011
As of the year 2000, there were seven countries without a Rothschild-owned Central Bank:

Afghanistan
Iraq
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran

Then along came the convenient terror of 9-11 and soon Iraq and Afghanistan had been added to the list, leaving only five countries without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family:

Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran


We all know how fast the Central Bank of Benghazi was set up.
The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family are:

Cuba
North Korea
Iran

And these mono-maniacal speculators in the west, via their nuke-weaponed ally Israel, are blatantly gagging to get that "Central Bank of Iran" set up... you 'suspect it' at the very least.


Day Later Supplemental: and this is mental - like the whole internet was just set up in such a two-tier-reality way so that completely insane methods of thought could be passed around in public and shared with 'those in the know' right under your nose.

Ready?

And comments from the original article's page:

22 comments:
keihatsu said...
I saw a news article indicating Cuba has opened up real estate sales recently.

That article indicates to me that Cuba has come under Rothschild control.

So that leaves two:

North Korea
Iran
7:41 PM
keihatsu said...
Follow up:

To the best of my knowledge Cuba succumbed due to threats of nuclear weapons buried in southern Florida.

Those nuclear weapons were disarmed in the last couple months however. So the threat is false.
7:44 PM
Mike Philbin said...
sounds like a clever move on the Global Chess Board was made against Cuba, and they sacrificed their queen(sic). Well done Corporate Game Players who lied about Napoleon winning in France to CRASH THE LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE in 1815 and clean up before the real news of Wellington's victory arrived.


7:54 PM
Emanance said...
I guess we will all live under the boot of the wrath child as long as we continue to believe that money and finance is the only means for humankind to survive or thrive.
10:34 PM
Herbicat said...
Did not see Vietnam on the list, do they have a Jewish controlled central bank?
5:16 AM
Danny S. said...
Keihatsu: Having a real-estate market does not mean having a Rothschild-owned central bank. Do you really think it does?
7:17 AM
James Delaney said...
Japan in WWII: A Casualty of Usury?
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/26 ... for-usury/


Hitler and the Banksters: The Abolition of Interest-Servitude
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09/13 ... servitude/


Dirty Little Secrets - the hidden, awkward origins of World War 2 - the unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events:
https://www.rense.com/general92/dirty.htm
10:32 AM
Apoca Lips said...
Very interesting, but I would like to get some documentation on this, before I believe it.

The Fed we all know about, but what about all the other hundreds of countries around?

I just checked my own country, Norway, and the norwegian central bank is owned by the state. This you can check in the business register, and the laws also confirm that.

So to be sure about this, we have to check every single central bank in the world and get the facts out. I cant believe that there are only 4 banks in the world (incl Norway) that are state-owned, at least not before I see the facts and can verify them myself.
11:13 AM
Anointed Tree said...
this is nonsense because my country is not even listed here and we have one of the highest per capita incomes in the world and we are a major financial centre. There are hundreds of countries on earth and to make such a claim as this is nothing but bogus.
11:43 AM
mugwort said...
"Well done Corporate Game Players who lied about Napoleon winning in France to CRASH THE LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE in 1815 and clean up before the real news of Wellington's victory arrived."

Since most of their original fortune was acquired by fraud, shouldn't they be forced to relinquish it? That would go a long way toward evening things out.

Kind of like belling the cat, though...
1:29 PM
urbanshakedowns said...
Some sources in support of your claim would be useful, I appreciate what you saying, but Iran won't be invaded to install a central bank, it'll be used as the catalyst for something much bigger and wider and will involve Russia and China.
3:37 PM
robertsgt40 said...
What about China?
4:24 PM
atexascash said...
When a baby is born in the United States, a birth certificate is registered with the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the State of birth. The key word here is "registered" as registered in international commerce. The baby becomes the surety, whose energy is due at some future date. When the birth certificate is registered in the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate ($1,000,000) and the bond is sold at some securities exchange and perhaps bought by the Federal Reserve Bank, which then uses it as collateral in order to issue Federal Reserve Notes or some other form of "debt obligation" (see 18 USC §411). The bond is then held in trust for the Federal Reserve at the Depository Trust Corp. At 55 Water Street, in New York City, about two blocks down the street from the Fed. It is a high rise office building and the sign out front reads "The Tower of Power".
4:44 PM
atexascash said...
When a baby is born in the United States, a birth certificate is registered with the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the State of birth. The key word here is "registered" as registered in international commerce. The baby becomes the surety, whose energy is due at some future date. When the birth certificate is registered in the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate ($1,000,000) and the bond is sold at some securities exchange and perhaps bought by the Federal Reserve Bank, which then uses it as collateral in order to issue Federal Reserve Notes or some other form of "debt obligation" (see 18 USC §411). The bond is then held in trust for the Federal Reserve at the Depository Trust Corp. At 55 Water Street, in New York City, about two blocks down the street from the Fed. It is a high rise office building and the sign out front reads "The Tower of Power".
4:44 PM
Fl4wl35 said...
Norway?
6:49 PM
cayrick said...
What about Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador?
8:13 PM
Mike Philbin said...
quite a lot of people are LOOKING FOR SOURCE on the insane claim of this post, so to help you, just a little bit, I'm going to suggest you search for:

Bank For International Settlements (BIS)

have fun out there in disinfo land, peops. It's all a massive scam against the real enemy, You The People.
8:51 PM
Stephen R Moore said...
What is the source of this information?

The Rothschild Group web site states only 42 countries.
https://www.rothschild.com/
10:59 PM
jnkz said...
@ Mike Philbin :

Bank For International Settlements Board of directors:

Christian Noyer, Paris (Chairman of the Board of Directors)
Hans Tietmeyer, Frankfurt am Main (Vice-Chairman)
Ben Bernanke, Washington, DC;
Mark Carney, Ottawa;
Mario Draghi, Rome;
William Dudley, New York;
Stefan Ingves, Stockholm;
Mervyn King, London;
Jean-Pierre Landau, Paris;
Guillermo Ortiz Martínez, Mexico City
Guy Quaden, Brussels;
Jean-Pierre Roth, Zürich;
Masaaki Shirakawa, Tokyo;
Jean-Claude Trichet, Frankfurt am Main;
Paul Tucker, London;
Alfons Vicomte Verplaetse, Brussels;
Axel A. Weber, Frankfurt am Main;
Nout Wellink, Amsterdam;
Zhou Xiaochuan, Beijing

Most of this "good" people attend every year the Bilderberg meeting.
11:26 PM
ecofuelsnz run your car on water said...
As for Norway.. just because your law states that your cental bank is owned by the state this doesnt mean its not owned by Roshchild or part of the global central banking sytem. It is part of the global central banking sytem. Its the same in New Zealand. The public is told that our central bank is state owned but its actually run by the business round table. The reserve bank of new zealand is controlled by the new zealand cia and they control everything in NZ.. this is no theory here.. its fact.. read "the opal file" on google to learn more on new zealands control structure. Its the same in Norway or any country that is part of the corrupt United Nations system of servitude to central (reserve) banks. Its very naive to think that a central or reserve bank is legitimate just because its 'state owned'.. the state is also owned by the corrupt bankers that control their puppet politicians!
3:35 AM
. said...
"I just checked my own country, Norway"

Really, it's possible to own it?
NORWAY is a registered trading corporation. That's a fact and that's how it's organized. The thing one worships as a replacement for accepting the living god (the soul), called 'the State' - is dead in comparison (a fiction).

When one believes in fictions instead of in the substance of the soul, this is the tipping point from which it is possible to see things fall apart. Substance goes out the window, and people take anything for a money. Including the people claiming to be employees of NORWAY, 'citizens'.

Is NORWAY registered as having ANY debt with the BIS or any external debt to any rothschild-controlled bank? Does it use debt as a currency? Is that currency freely trade-able? And is one aware the Bank of England is an english at the core, as the Federal Reserve is american? Apply the principal to the local central bank and one quickly discovers when one 'checks the books', the material freely available what the people who have been brought up to be slaves/employees their whole lives, through the public (State) education system, is the material for people to find - YOU, who misconstrue themselves as slaves/trustees. Such is not the substantive reality, having been abandoned a long time ago in favour of one's lust for buying and selling (one's brother into slavery, through commerce).


Claiming NORWAY is 'your Country' is like claiming one owns MCDONALDS. How can one own an idea? And why would some one want to claim to be an employee of a corporation openly, unless that was one's intent? [a question an agent asks themselves]

There is the presumption one is an employee to begin with. When the living man opens his mouth and removes all doubt, this presumption is backed-up by first-hand testimony (one puts one's balls on the line). So surely, this man must be an employee! An employee needs a boss, and somewhere up the fictional food chain, an executive, since he has clearly admitted to be incapable of being his own executor. It also needs beneficiaries (rothschilds, rockefellers, et al). The world runs on trusts, and not in an imagined vacuum.
5:44 AM
. said...
"the material freely available what the people who have been brought up to be slaves/employees their whole lives, through the public (State) education system, is the material for people to find - YOU, who misconstrue themselves as slaves/trustees. Such is not the substantive reality, having been abandoned a long time ago in favour of one's lust for buying and selling (one's brother into slavery, through commerce)."

I admit the above could have been phrased more clearly.

"The material discovered through the process of artificial reasoning which has been schooled into those who have attended State schools, brings them to the conclusion 'the central bank' is 'owned' by 'the State'."

And those who (many) misconstrue themselves as trustees (employees), and speak as a trustee, all the time (due to the State 'free' education, i.e. schooling). Thereby remove all doubt by their testimony they are not beneficiaries.

"Such is not the substantive reality" Now the text is unclear... The point is: Every one is by nature, a beneficiary of the earth, and many people are trading in their beneficiary/executor position for that of employee/trustee by their own testimony and/or unrebutted presumptions.

When, through ignorance, one abandons ones beneficiary status at every turn, and chooses not to lead their own lives (self-government, executor), it is about the same time they abandon themselves to commerce, to buying and selling.

And in the above scenario, a small group of (non-labouring) people, antagonistic to the living cultures, end up being the greatest beneficiaries of labour. Instead of giving and trust, and knowledge thereof, from ignorance the mind (spirit) is turned towards death and commerce.

I hope that clears any previous possible confusion.


And by 'YOU' it should say 'ONE': it was not intended as a personal remark against the previous poster's comments, please do not take it personally.
7:58 AM

[rerevisionist]

Just a couple of points.

[1] There's the question of who owns the paper money. Not the security printers who print it. The version I've heard is that (e.g.) the Fed has the monopoly, and claims interest on newly-printed money, at face value. If the money were gold, say, then it would make sense. They come up with money, and collect interest. But paper money obviously must cost less, a lot less, than the face value. And that's the scam. If the treasury of a country borrows genuine money, interest is to be expected. If they borrow paper money, the 3% or whatever on face value returns a huge amount to the owners of the paper. This is (I think) what Mooninquirer meant when he said LBJ (a Jew) and no doubt Truman (Freemason) wanted to bankrupt the USA - the more money wasted on bombs and weaponry, the more indebted the US would be. This would cement the position of these people - presumably Rothschilds - for as long as people accept the currency.

I think it's the loan system, rather than the nominal controller of each state bank, that is the issue.

[2] The Napoleon and Rothschilds issue - it's striking that there are no post-1815 novels on the Waterloo defeat of Napoleon and (apparently) the Rotshchilds. (This is not the 1814 fraud). One gathers that some, or many, landowners were ruined, and yet where are the realistic novels about that? I would guess the same thing applies to the US civil war - there's romanticised drivel like Gone With the Wind but are there novels/ histories about the money side of that war?

[NUKELIES]

Brideshead Revisited fictionalised - and therefore perhaps trivialised - the colossal displacement of the British arisocracy which has taken place since Rothschild fully took over the country after Waterloo. I wouldn't be surprised if Rothschild secretly *owns* The National Trust which seems to own half the large estates in England, including all their acreage.

[rerevisionist]

NUKELIES - good comment on the National Trust. Now you mention it, I wouldn't be surprised either.

As to the British Aristocracy, I don't think they were as monolithic, or as secure, as might be imagined from things like Pride and Prejudice or as you say Brideshead Revisited a hundred-plus years later. Under Henry VII, Earls who didn't toe the line were liable to be penalised - Edward de Vere's family suffered. Under Henry VIII, aristocrats who chose wrongly, i.e. for Catholicism, had a hard time as 'Recusants', or worse. Elizabeth managed to dispose of opposition such as the Howards in Norfolk. Later, Cromwell was famous for replacing aristocrats in Ireland, and the Civil War must have had the same effect on up to half of all aristocratic families in England who supported the wrong side. Then by the 1700s (18th century!) usury and the enclosures got into their stride, so that many of the families in the huge houses (with all the roads in the area radiating from their buildings) may have been new. Very likely these buildings were mortgaged, or attracted mortgages later, and may have felt like a millstone; it's part of the invisible nature of legal practices that it's difficult even to guess ultimate ownership. Some new aristocrats must have been military, some economic - in fact I suspect the Russell family may have achieved promotion, or greater stability, by siding with the new system, which would explain Bertrand Russell's cowardice in not addressing Jewish issues. At the end of the 1700s, Napoleon twisted the kaleidoscope, and the Rothschild activity led to another wave of change, notably in 1815. Then after 1914 the First World War's massacres resulted in death duties on such families with sons, these duties, one gathers, being large; very possibly death duties were voted in partly for that reason. The same sort of thing, only much more so, must have happened on the continent.

[rerevisionist]

How the Paper Money Scam Works

A dramatized illustration, which may be about right, though complications through bonds and long-term contracts, and electronic credit, are omitted here.

A non-existent country's annual budget is being discussed. The President, the Treasurer, various Secretaries of this and that, and Mr Fedgeld are present.

Mr President: OK, guys. Let's listen to our Treasurer's able summary of the state of our State. [Muted laughter]

Treasurer: Sure, Mr President. Now let's see. We have 100 million people. We estimate 50 million are economically active. Our entire infrastructure is valued at 20 trillion dollars. Our national income is estimated at 2 trillion dollars. That's [counts on fingers] an average income of 20K. Per head. Now depreciation of infrastructure - that's roads, housing, industrial buildings -

Mr President: Yeh, we can look these things up. Let's hear our position, we, the government, us important people...

Treasurer: Um, sure well. [Leafs through papers] Well, we the government take 1.3 trillion of the national income. That is, made up from income tax .8 trillion, duties on booze, tobacco, gasoline .2 trillion, company taxes .1 trillion, and miscellaneous - lotteries, bonds to the public, motorist fines, licensing, the rest.

That's our income. Now, expenditure. We have civil servants, inspectors, police, fire, schools, legal stuff, some health services, Intelligence Agency, Investigations. That's 1 trillion.

Secretary of Internal Affairs: Lemme just say thank you, we are doing OK! [Various murmurs]

Treasurer: Yes, yes. We also have pension liabilities for persons retiring in the future. And we have past debt of 1 trillion, mostly borrowed interest-only. That's .4 trillion a year - it averages 4%. And now we have future plans - let's hear it from the Secretaries....

Education Secretary: Waal, we have a neat project to demolish all schools and rebuild them in nicer neighborhoods. In that way the whole country benefits. And a new 'holocaust' memorial for every town with more than 10,000 people. We estimate total cost 1 trillion spread over 5 years.

Weapons Secretary: We intend to continue with our 50,000 'nuke' warheads and our real nice battleships. We intend to replace all our aircraft with 'green' bombers. We need to increase our information budget to counter some of the scurrilous lies being spread. We estimate total cost 4 trillion spread over ten years.

Science and Education Secretary: We have real great plans. Centers for Disease Control to be funded to invent great new diseases. NASA's new project to set up a new town on Jupiter, over the next hundred years. New standards for university education to allow non-literate disadvantaged persons earn their degrees. Climate change education to form 25% of all education. Total cost only half a trillion, a real bargain.

Immigration and Population Improvement Secretary: We want to put centers in Africa and all the poorest countries, to get able-bodied males to come here, at public expense, minimum a million a year. All medical care, housing, paid for. Plus extra policing if there are complaints. White women to do community service as sex workers. Of course with religious exemption for non-Christians. Total probably a quarter of a trillion, we can use cheap houses. Likely to go up though.

Treasurer: Hm. I see. [Adds up column of figures]. OK. National income - 2 trillion. Tax and revenue take - 1.2 trillion. Debt - 1 trillion.

Now; costs for the coming year. Running expenses - 1 trillion. Interest on debt - .4 trillion. Education projects - .2 trillion. Weapons - .4 trillion. Science .5 trillion. Population improvement - .25 trillion. Lemme see.

OK - income 1.2 trillion. Expenditure - just short of 2.75 trillion.

Pensions Secretary: You've forgotten pensions, Mr Treasurer. We estimate...

Treasurer: Aw, shut your mouth. We have enough problems. Now, we have a shortfall of nearly 1 and a half trillion. Judging by history, your estimates will be way short, anyway. Even if we give you half of what you want we'll be short...

Mr Fedgeld: It seems difficult. But allow me to suggest a way out. Now, it seems it's ever-more difficult to ask our patriotic people to lend funds. Some of them even want index-linked repayments, for God's sake. Do they think we're made of money? The last time you tried borrowing - the 'Patriots funding war for peace' scheme - we only netted 2 million dollars and 37 cents, and at 8%.

All we need to do is my Fed organisation to print nice new money. And only at 3%, which you must admit is a bargain. I can arrange it this very afternoon. I'd suggest you trim the departments by half. Then I'll issue you 1 trillion - well, 1.1 to allow 10% inflation - don't want to run out, do we. OK, it increases the national debt, but what's new?

Treasurer: Well... [I leave the rest of the discussion to your imagination].

__________________
Later: private phone line:
Mr Fedgeld: Ah, Papiergeld, there you are. Yep, 1 trillion split in 10s, 20s, and 50s, with the new 'all seeing eye' logo on the front, and that engraving of Dimbobo on the back, the one that looks like a clown, yes that one. Should fill a few warehouses, that order. Yes, it'll take time to filter into circulation. Yes, we got 3%, that's er 3% of 1,000 billion isn't it. 3.3 billion every year, on top of what we get already. I assume you're charging your usual 5 cents a note? Your previous Chairman wanted 6 cents - that's why he's previous. OK, that's fixed. Now, I must decide what to spend it on. Speak to you later.

[NUKELIES]

NUKELIES - good comment on the National Trust. Now you mention it, I wouldn't be surprised either.

As to the British Aristocracy, I don't think they were as monolithic, or as secure, as might be imagined from things like Pride and Prejudice or as you say Brideshead Revisited a hundred-plus years later. Under Henry VII, Earls who didn't toe the line were liable to be penalised - Edward de Vere's family suffered. Under Henry VIII, aristocrats who chose wrongly, i.e. for Catholicism, had a hard time as 'Recusants', or worse. Elizabeth managed to dispose of opposition such as the Howards in Norfolk. Later, Cromwell was famous for replacing aristocrats in Ireland, and the Civil War must have had the same effect on up to half of all aristocratic families in England who supported the wrong side. Then by the 1700s (18th century!) usury and the enclosures got into their stride, so that many of the families in the huge houses (with all the roads in the area radiating from their buildings) may have been new. Very likely these buildings were mortgaged, or attracted mortgages later, and may have felt like a millstone; it's part of the invisible nature of legal practices that it's difficult even to guess ultimate ownership. Some new aristocrats must have been military, some economic - in fact I suspect the Russell family may have achieved promotion, or greater stability, by siding with the new system, which would explain Bertrand Russell's cowardice in not addressing Jewish issues. At the end of the 1700s, Napoleon twisted the kaleidoscope, and the Rothschild activity led to another wave of change, notably in 1815. Then after 1914 the First World War's massacres resulted in death duties on such families with sons, these duties, one gathers, being large; very possibly death duties were voted in partly for that reason. The same sort of thing, only much more so, must have happened on the continent.

I see mortgages and death duties as part of the Bank of England which is in turn part of a larger push to take the sheeple's honey away from the Church of Rome.

[Heiwa]

The European Central Bank that issues Euros (and is apparently owned by the countries using Euros and not Rothschilds or whoever) was supposed, by law, to just issue a certain amount of Euros to keep the Euroeconomy expanding at a nice rate and keep inflation down. Hélas, some Eurocountries needed extra Euros to keep their social systems ++ going so more Euros than needed healthily were issued by ECB and traded and suddenly some Eurocountries borrowed money on the open market at big interest rates and got in trouble and ECB was buying up those loans against all rules and ... there we are. It will be sorted out 2012 and then we are back on the right track again.

[rerevisionist]

Heiwa:
The European Central Bank that issues Euros (and is apparently owned by the countries using Euros and not Rothschilds or whoever) ... suddenly some Eurocountries borrowed money on the open market at big interest rates ... It will be sorted out 2012 and then we are back on the right track again.

I'm not sure if the last sentence is entirely serious... However as regards the Rothschilds I find it hard to believe Europe wasn't structured to favour them. The whole 'Holocaust' fraud has been imposed on Europe for about 60 years. Most of the European bosses (all of course unelected) were 'Communists' - for example Barroso, and Merkel - all of course therefore part of the Jewish sphere of influence. The whole of the Second World War was Jewish-influenced. The USA emerged fairly intact from WW2, and its economic policy, and the Bretton Woods settlement, and the dollar as paper money - were all Jewish policies. It's not credible to me that Europe would have been allowed an independent system. However, this isn't of course proof.

The point of my little playlet is to illustrate how a small group can force what it thinks are its own interests.

You may remember the author of What They Don't Tell You At The Harvard Business School writing somewhere that lawyers are perfectly happy to do you $500,000 damage provided they get $20K. (Or whatever figures). Mooninquirer said something similar, quoting a writer to the effect that LBJ, a Jew, wanted to bankrupt the United States. The point there being to make the US more dependent on the Fed, so they could make more money. In pursuit of this, millions of dead Vietnamese, a few dead Americans, vast waste on fraudulent arms projects, were all OK to LBJ.