It's clear that the Trinity test was a fake, and there were no atom bombs over Japan in 1945. It's also clear that the USSR was dominated by Jews at first, and that its industry was installed secretly by western companies using something like slave labour. The official view was, and is, that the Second World War in the Pacific was ended by atom bombs. Our view is that the myth of these bombs was made up partly to make money for Jews in the Manhattan Project, to be continued after the war; and partly to keep Stalin out of some Japanese islands. And partly to keep Stalin out of Europe, though this motive would not have been Jewish, but the other allies. (And it may have been simply because Russia had been devastated by war, so that further war by Stalin might provoke terminal collapse of the 'USSR'). At any rate it suggests Stalin believed the story.
We suggest here the H bomb was made up with the deliberate intention, all along, to fake leaks of information to the USSR, so that they would be believed to have H bombs and thus not be threatened. This is consistent with secret cliques of Jews controlling, not just financial and propaganda, but also 'nuclear' policy in both countries.
The first US H bomb was supposed to have been in 1952, 'Ivy Mike', rigged up by Edward Teller, who however absented himself from the supposed trial. I'd guess this was in the event it was challenged: he could simply say he was never there, and had been misled. Stalin presumably believed in this event. If so, he'd want his own H bomb. Possibly he made plans to check it himself, or get competent people to measure and record it; if so, there was a danger that the secret would get out. If Stalin thought the US atom and H-bombs were real, and the physicists in the USSR incompetent, the physicists would be in trouble. So I suggest there may be a link with Stalin's death in March 1953. Stalin's death has often been speculated to be a murder, but the motive of H bomb pretence is of course not yet generally considered. Note that the USSR H-bomb was supposed to have been August 1953, i.e. after Stalin's death. There seems to be doubt over Stalin's date of death - so a Henry VII style sequence of events may have taken place, with orders being attributed to Stalin, after his death, which, among other things, consolidated the physicists' position.
______________________________________________________________________________________
An interesting book, which I recommend on the whole, is Franz Johann Irsigler's Who Makes Our Money? Irsigler was (it seems) born in 1900, a Catholic who lived in France - I'd guess in the area claimed by both France and Germany - who migrated to South Africa, where he worked in neurology and the brain. This book has eighteen chapters, but it has to be said that the layout and logical structure is weak - some of the chapters are in effect book reviews, other switch between topics; and the bibliographical information is scattered and not very good. Some of the chapters seem to have been published in newspapers and journals; thier dates are uncertain, and the first publication date of the collection is uncertain - 1980 or before. I believe it's been republished in hard copy form recently - I'd hope with improved titles, subheadings, table of contents, and indexing.
Irsigler has chapters on Roosevelt, Churchill, the CIA, the press, and paper money - and on the American Revolution (Who Provoked the American War of Independence?, and Who Plotted World War I, Prolonged it by Two Years, and Created Danzig and the Polish Corridor, and Who Plotted World War II ..., and for example Eisenhower, 'friend of Bernard Baruch ... promoted over 150 others ... without battle experience'.
Anyway Irsigler speculates on Stalin's death; he attributes it to Stalin deciding not to destroy Germany in accordance with the Morgenthau Plan - he was supposed to have said "there will always be a Germany'. The Jews in the USSR 'must have been furious' as they wanted Germany destroyed. I'm suggesting another motive here, namely to ensure Stalin never found out the atom bomb was fake.
['Our' view is a bit presumptious of me - I just mean it seems to have emerged as a consensus]