Trump's First Year. Issues and non-Jews. Rerevisionist. From http://big-lies.org/jews/articles-on-jews.html

[ This page is taken from the much longer page big-lies.org/jews/articles-on-jews.html | Main big-lies website ]

Some ‘memes’ from the last few years of Internet...

... “Kek!”—the confident call of Pepe the frog, adopted by the people of the once-new land of Kekistan as their emblem. Kekistan's history includes frog-God ‘Kek rain’ inundation mythology, and a period subservient to Kikistan as mercenaries and slaves. Now Kekistan is endangered by the suffocating forces of Cuckistan and Normistan, secretly paid by Kikistani organised crime syndicates, whose undeciphered motto is “Gd chosen” and whose sinister tribal chant is “Nat sea”. (Information on iconography from the Bibliokek Nationale)....

President Trump's First Year. Some Issues and (Mostly) Non-Jew Commentators.

Written by Rerevisionist 10 April 2017 - 15 September 2017 (Was called 'Is Lipstadt a Covert Counter-Mossad Truther?—and Other Puzzles)
Reformatted and I hope easier reading as standalone page 25 Feb 2019. Some https URLs made http 20 May 2019

The theme of this long piece is, yet again, Jews—identifying and disentangling their influence, and the deeper issue of identifying their collaborators, puppets, and eventual possible outcomes of these groups.

Many Internet sites have been correctly accused of being crypto-Jewish, or written by trolls, or written by professional spooks, or just ignorantly biased to Jews. People unused to Jewish analyses may like my soft introduction, my own extremely incomplete list of 'joff' websites, Jews-off-the-radar, with my reasoning. I've tried to explain in what respects they are wrong, incomplete, dishonest, and evil. Many are shills for Jews, large numbers are scared to discuss Jewish wire-pulling, many are paid by Jews or Jewish pressure groups. By this time, virtually all political parties are subservient to Jews. And conversely, here's my intermittently-compiled list of 'jadar' sites, with brief comments—some a bit unkind, where I think I've found covert Jew biases. Sites like these are the most likely to convey hard and shocking and novel views, and I encourage novices to browse—your life, literally, is at risk if you are not Jew-aware. These sites may be subject to attacks of various types: the least toxic attack is full censorship—the complete lack of mention in Jewish and Jewish-puppet sources, which include all 'mainstream' print media, all mainstream TV including British, German and French TV, all government departments excepting a few leaks and forced replies to questions, and a proportion of Internet information. Looking at my lists of websites, bear in mind that my opinion may turn out to be wrong; I don't monitor websites all the time. And remember websites can vanish, change policy, be taken over, or otherwise change.

Jews continue full-on with their established post-1945 schemes: these include lying about the Holocaust™, lying about other historical events such as Jews in Russia/ USSR, promoting large-scale immigration into disenfranchised white countries. And media deceits, false flags and paid 'demonstrators'; pushes for other people to fight wars, and continued financial frauds and manufactured debts at the expense of non-Jews. There are no indications—or perhaps the very slightest—that Jews will change, or learn to modify their attitudes, and nothing which begins to address their full range of activities.

It is instructive to live through a time like this, at least for the luckier ones. These events often seem unbelievable, in the way many events in history now seem incredible. A section at the end of this article draws conclusions from lessons learned by Jew-aware people over the centuries. I hope many of my readers will include themselves amongst the aware. I've gone back: to the inventions of Christianity and Islam; the use of covert thug armies; Jewish perversions of legal and scientific events, such as companies, military imperialism, and prolonged propaganda wars; and the conditions in human societies which allow aggressive parasitism to root and grow and propagate genetically.

Donald Trump?
My piece on Donald Trump (written December 2015, before his election victory) lists some of the worries Jews could be expected to have about Trump, including the ‘Mexican wall’, Trump's experience with tall buildings (and therefore 9/11), Jewish control of money and debt, Jews and middle east wars, including all the countries around Israel, Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya and Syria predominating, undeclared issues such as wars in Africa and Jewish control of Saudi Arabia. Arguably, Jews are most concerned with concealment of nuclear frauds (too science-based for most commentators), the Holocaust™ fraud, and the failing Jewish media (as concealments, of e.g. history of Jewish atrocities, and e.g. Jewish plans to dump the USA, get more difficult).

The obvious question is to what extent Donald Trump is just another Jew or crypto-Jew. It's obviously impossibly early to guess his final achievements. But it seems clear that—after a running start—he will not act as vigorously as was hoped. But he's made some changes to the ambience of US politics: his speeches actually mentioned the destruction and chaos after the Jewish war against Iraq, and the destruction and chaos of the Jew-funded ISIS thugs. War against Iran seems to have been replaced by war against the even tinier North Korea [Note: 8 Aug 2017: the Jew-controlled BBC seems to have announced North Korea has a 'nuclear weapon' or payload, or something; they have also announced or claimed that North Korea has some sort of missile—in both cases with no technical details. Possibly these are two items in a pre-war checklist, to be the start of yet another Jew war—I hope not, but I imagine Jews are getting excited at the thought of blood, like hyenas], though as far as I know Trump hasn't publically discussed the North Korean non-Jew central bank, or removing the Federal Reserve from Jewish control. Even after a century, many Americans still haven't worked out that the USSR was run by Jews, supplied by Jews outside Russia. This may help explain continuing anti-Russia agitation, a long-term Jewish favourite. Most Americans don't seem to understand that Putin, Jewish or not, has an inherited problem with Jews.
Trump has had video coverage of discussions with US military brass, probably all of them war criminals, who look a sheepish lot, uneasy in their uniforms, looking like people running large-scale dangerous load trucker outfits. Trump by comparison seems a golden-haired presiding Zeus.
It's impossible to be sure whether attacks (Gas?? Cruise missiles??) trumpeted in the Jew media even took place, such is the frequency of false flags and rarity of any sort of punishment. It's impossible to be certain about events such as the Georgia I-85 bridge collapse. It's impossible to be certain whether police action will finally focus onto Soros-funded groups (I haven't checked the documents; I assume other people have): 'Welcome the stranger' and other fake invaders-as-friends groups, Black Lives Matter, By All Means Necessary, 'Pussy' groups, Femen, Antifa, LesbianGay etc groups with their absurd 'pronouns'.
It's also impossible for outside observers to guess the true state of mind of Americans, given the Jewish control over reports: there must be some Americans who've worked out what's been happening since 1945. Investigations of Jew frauds promise to be non-existent; but who knows? What about Jews in the opium wars (might get Chinese support), Jews in USSR and Ukraine, the 'Liberty survivors given new life by Internet, the Gulf of Tonkin? And as financial mysteries get peeled and exposed, what about Jewish deliberate waste to add to government debt so Jews collect interest? Maybe faux demonstrations in places like Berkeley are encouraged to increase police overtime charges and add to city debt? Chicago points the same way. I believe more people are waking up to these things—Charlottesville strikes me as misjudged, just as 9/11 seems now to have been too easily seen through. Issues such as debts being nominally supplied to pension funds—always an encouraging remote topic to allow frauds to slip in. I even hope swindles with currencies, inflation manipulation, selective financial attacks on countries, and interest control will move back into discussion, raising people like Henry George and Major C Douglas and Henry Ford from hibernation. But it will be a long time before reparations to Russians, Ukrainians and Europeans, and Jewish victims elsewhere, are enforced.

Anyway: to summarise Trump so far: He has done nothing to expose the Holohoax fraud. He has done nothing to reimburse Americans for the 9/11 fraud. He has done nothing about other enormous frauds: nukes, NASA, AIDS, (and the US education system) being examples known to me. He doesn't seem to have done anything about Jewish news media, as per his campaign speeches; perhaps he's just waiting for the media to collapse, and for education on race and population and real economics to grow. He seems to have done nothing to reverse the Jewish policy of giving the votes to as many aliens as possible. He seems to have done nothing about Jewish drug, porn and prostitution activities, and trafficking in people and organs. I can't tell if he's doing anything about the US empire, and its costs, doing so much for Jew interest payments. Or about possible mass inflation: US frauds are so huge (H Clinton supposedly embezzled 100s of billions of dollars for Haiti, for example) that the era of worthless dollars may approach, as in hyperinflations in, say, Hungary, Germany, and Zimbabwe. But Trump has said he'll close the 'Global Warming' scam; I'd guess this may be because all the burden falls on white countries, with India and China ignored. This may be part of a reindustrialise the USA policy. A recent White House memo shows Trump is still pretending to believe the entire 9/11 fraud, which must annoy selfless people who have studied it for years. But Trump has shown—or seemed to show—lack of enthusiasm for the Holocaust fraud, Perhaps because of family interests in east Europe—or perhaps cracks are growing in the Jewish 'community'.
I'm not in a good position to assess Trump's personnel choices: there's a limit to what one man can do, and many of Trump's selections seemed good to me. And of course, let's be honest—he has to work against centuries of covert Anglo-American-Jew alliances. It's a lot to ask.
[Start of article]

US Education with unlimited Jewish paper money
Whites have potential for learning, which Jews damage. If learning is damaged in young children, they will never recover fully. Jewish books are junk, Jewish 'celebrities' are dim, teaching methods such as 'look-say' and 'modules' are calculated to harm, critical appreciation is not taught.

• Jews love government debt, since they get interest, and it's counter-intuitive to 'goyim' who hate personal debt.
• So spending increases. Salaries go up, buildings are replaced unnecessarily, staff multiply, there is constant inflation in nominal status, with full professors, various assistant and adjunct professors on a huge scale.
• The Frankfurt School ('New School of Social Research') in New York, and LSE (London School of Economics) were pioneers, issuing low grade PhDs, as pretexts for further 'professional research'.
• Poor-quality courses inflate both in numbers, and poorness of standards, which drop to a level necessary to attract low quality pseudo-students. Women's studies and race studies are obvious examples with negative intellectual content, but history, 'liberal arts', religion and sciences such as psychology, sociology, food sciences, and simple reading/writing, have trended down, however poor the quality was in the past.
• Jewish social engineering increases: courses are weakened, female students and black students and even illiterate illegals are shoehorned in by Jews.
• Jewish paper money exerts a total stranglehold over funding: Jews control all research, and all intellectual frameworks, so that true views of religion, Jewish history, power politics, the Middle East, media studies, are choked away, leaving the ground free for junk academics, who are indistinguishable from non-academic ideologues—Barbara Spectre, Noel Ignatiev, Lipstadt, Professor Evans, Melissa Click, Eric Clanton illustrate some of the types.
• Jewish networking ensures unintelligent Jews are given positions that equity does not entitle them to. The system becomes choked with uncreative plagiarists.
• This sort of thing seems more or less worldwide: see e.g. Cambridge University's official website.
• Some towns—New York and London are examples—are overburdened with Jew 'teachers' at all levels. It's agonising to visualise the interminable bullshit of these ridiculous and ignorant pre-medieval ideologies.
• Medical hacks push pills, diets, give feeble advice on diabetes, smoking, vaccination, and what have you. Media studies courses say nothing serious about media. Black African education is pitifully feeble. A vast mid-range of indistinguishable types want careers like English vicars, with guaranteed income for little effort apart from propaganda output.

Lipstadt and the US Education System The 'Six Day War' gained 'Holocaust' mythology momentum from all the Jewish media from (say) 1967, when Lipstadt was about 20. 'Holocaust' inventions apart from immediate post-war 1945ish claims are newer than many people think; the similar perpetual victim lies had been made since before 1900, but were rather vague. Lipstadt's book Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (published 1993; available online) was published a few years before Internet (and hardware improvements) began to spread public awareness of the 'Shoah Business' hoaxes beyond a fairly small circle reliant on paper publishing.

Several notable revisionist events, which already seem dated, happened before Lipstadt's book: Arthur Butz's The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against The Presumed Extermination Of European Jewry, (1975) was one. Did Six Million Really Die? (1974), uploaded by Ernst Zündel on his Zundelsite.com, sparked a Jewish group in Canada to take legal action in 1985 and 1988, which included defense testimonies by David Irving in 1988, and Fred Leuchter on gas chambers 1988, also in 1988. The prosecution testimonies were outstandingly feeble, and in fact laughable, under the precision fire of the attorney Doug Christie. In France, Rassinier, Bardèche and Faurisson might be regarded as a failure, since their work culminated in the censoring Fabius-Gayssot Law of 1990.
At this point, enter Deborah Lipstadt. She appears to be a 'Professor' at Emory University, in the deepish South. I've read that Emory is listed 20th in the USA—with that absurd pseudo-precision of which the USA leads the world; and 3 of 5 of its 'notable alumni' are/were in sport. Probably the Jewish paper money fraud funds Biblical fundamentalism in large parts of the USA, a policy similar to the Jew-annotated 'Scofield Bible'. (Are Americans really so stupid they can't understand the simple idea of 'evolution'?) Anyway, presumably Lipstadt's whole life has been bounded by the confines of Talmudic absurdities, which she has never had the wit or curiosity to investigate. (I've just noticed an online upload, ADL-EOTR.pdf, 230 MB, , a 1988 typed report, 'EXTREMISM on the RIGHT', the sort of thing that Lipstadt can be expected to have in her small library. I can't entirely recommend it, as it's an unnecessarily vast file.)
(Historical parallel: Church of England vicars, guaranteed a lifetime's income after a few years amateur scribbling on Greek, Latin, and philosophy, had a similar life, with a few simple tasks and Sunday sermons; no wonder they were mostly worthless, though (let's be fair) they did produce Malthus, Gilbert White of Selborne, Cox (of the orange pippin apple) and the twiddly hazel discoverer. Just as now, what progress was made was outside the church; railways, ships, clothes, telegraphy, for example. I suspect the move to the professionalisation of society had the same source.)
Lipstadt would seem to have had a non-nutritious diet based on a small shelf of Judaic books. One of the disappointing aspects of thinkers of every type is their plateau: having found their level, they will not go on to tackle distant mountains, or even nearby hills. Presumably Lipstadt was and is this type, and must have been outraged, from her viewpoint, at doubters. She is part of the spread-out network of Jew supremacists distributed around the world, all anxious to tell lies about Jewish mass killings in Armenia, and the Ukraine, and the USSR, and Jewish financial frauds, and wars attributed to the USA in (for example) Korea and Vietnam, and science frauds in medicine and biology and in particular nuclear physics—all the carefully-hidden crime of the network, and most of it anti-white. And most of it ignored by the disgrace of the US education system.
'Professor' Lipstadt has played her minor part in dilapidating what there is of the American education system. Could she be a covert truther? On the face of it, this sounds incredible. And yet her book could be interpreted in that light. It was published a few years before public Internet started its growth—like convolvulus filling up Jewish backyards, to more-or-less quote David Irving. The book went some way to advertising such people as Zündel, Leuchter, and Robert Faurisson, and predecessors—Harry Elmer Barnes, Paul Rassinier, Austin App, Ditlieb Felderer, 'Richard Harwood', Arthur Butz, F J P Veale, and many more. (Veale's Advance to Barbarism... seems to have prompted many other similarly-titled mimicry-camouflage books, by Jews such as Martin Gilbert). It's true many formidable critics were not included: for example Wilhelm Stäglich. Some, for example Carlo Mattogno and Jürgen Graf, may have been too late for inclusion. Wilmot Robertson (of Instauration) was certainly in time for inclusion, as were other Europeans. Lipstadt's book seems to have sold as few copies as it deserved, but it, or extracts, became a handy reference source for some inquirers as Internet and search engines expanded.
Many Jewish race supremacist sites masquerade as serious political websites, and are a serious threat to the spread of truth. Lipstadt of course is a part of this movement, which will get no sympathy here: like specially-bred invasive poisonous dwarf plants, devoted to a fantasy world of Chief Rabbis and Seders, and systematic lies about wars and frauds, they need examination and removal. Their systematised denial of Jewish mass murders in Armenia, Ukraine, the USSR and Europe, among many other incidents, marks them as truly disgusting worldwide enemies of decency.

[Start of article]

Type Seven C 16 Dec 2017 Youtube comment
Bob Smith I don't like Muslims either, but there is a major concept that you are missing. It is Jews who let the hostile third-world savages flood into White countries. The Muslims didn't let themselves in. Third world Muslims do not control the immigration policy of White Western nations. Jews do. Use your brain. The reason we have weak borders in every single White nation is because of Jewish subversion. Jews are also responsible for all of the anti-White rhetoric that floods our news media, popular culture, academia, social media, music, movies, TV shows, etc. Jews control ALL of those things. Jews have been purposely destroying White genetics and White culture in White nations for decades. Jews are destroying you right now. Think of Islam as the 'gun', but Jews are the ones holding the gun. Wake up, naive sheep.
Jews and fake refugees

Undeclared Race Wars: the Armies Line-Up This piece is sparked by Denial, a fairly new Jewish propaganda film. Following Archibald Ramsay, I'll refer to the Jew supremacist war, primarily against whites, as the 'Nameless' or 'Undeclared' War. The line-ups are taking shape: whites in particular are waking up, almost entirely because of Internet. It's difficult to judge non-whites: my impression is that blacks are generally clueless, and (for example) know almost nothing about Jews in Africa. Muslims have a complicated relationship to Jews, including the likelihood that Islam was a Jewish-promoted mimic designed to use them as rather brainless thugs. The white Internet world includes awareness of occupied regimes at differing levels—Canada, USA, UK, France, Germany, Poland, Hungary, Russia, China, Japan—sayanim trolls and liars, inadequate education systems, the 'British' Broadcasting Corporation, Common Purpose 'graduates' and the US junk media, for example the 'failing New York Times'. All this is familiar enough to wide-awake people—for a refresher course, try my primary file on the history of Jews—everything from history to the present day, money systems, media propaganda, and wars.
This is not to say all, or even most, whites understand what's happening. There are many small lights of evidence getting through, in widely differing fields: the Fed scam; the way government debt, owned by Jews, grows to pay them more interest—until it's offloaded in one of their financial frauds; historical events—Liberty, 9/11, the Holohoax, mass killings in the Jew-run USSR, the US revolution—just a tiny sample; religious frauds, medical frauds, housing frauds, military and weapon frauds and wars; payments for thugs and fake demonstrators; the Jewish part in unelected nonwhite invasion; sex trafficking; damage to the family; damage to education. As yet, few people have grasped the big picture, but if Internet illumination increases, awareness must increase with it, unless censorship is successful.
Interlude: The Nameless War (book title by Captain Ramsay, 1952) is as good a name as any for a process which he dates from 1290, with Edward I's expulsion of Jews. It was a war between Europeans and self-styled Jews. Jews had a different model of their nation, not the cities and territories which seem natural to Europeans, but spread amongst other peoples, secretly in communication, functioning like patches of rot, growing, changing, contracting according to the fortunes of their hosts.
Cromwell, Napoleon, Balfour, Lenin, Stalin and Roosevelt may be taken as six of the most significant figures, all puppets in one way or another of Jews. The discovery of the Americas was a parallel development over most of this time, as were developments in all aspects of travel and communication. The very first World War was between Britain and its thalassocratic empire, and France under Napoleon, aiming east across the Mediterranean. Until recently, most whites lived much of their lives in white surroundings wherever they were; it was easy to sell the idea of wars by country, although it's obvious enough that subdivisions by race are equally likely to provide causes for wars.

A simple genetic basis underlies all this: the predecessors of Jews micro-evolved in the presence of writing, and of cities, as a human variety or strain or breed—secretive, fanatical, parasitic, united among themselves while hostile and deadly to any human opponents. It was a remarkable change in humanity, relying on population densities far above those in normal animal societies without language. Provided other populations were divided into groups by the necessity for specialisation, and were able to create goods, but could not spy on the whole of their populations, the possibilities opened up for systematic deception. Simple fanaticism, as a primary impulse, induced protective mimicry, language and collective networking as behaviour-effectors, sensitivity in detecting differences between other groups, and severe training of the young, including the death penalty for informing non-Jews.
As Jews would point out if they were honest, there was a simultaneous genetic micro-evolution, notably with whites, as they developed in their geographic strongholds, and needed mutual trust to work on their specialisations. Europe is unusual geographically in its divisions and natural barriers: unlike areas liable to invasion, this may have produced a feeling of security and low suspicion of strangers in its inhabitants. Whereas vast open areas of desert, steppe, grassland were more obviously vulnerable to attackers.
The result in the previous five or so millennia seems to have been war between rather isolated specialist types, experts in their fields—sometimes literally—with no option but to trust other specialists, versus inward-looking fanatical uncreative types starting from ghettoes, sending out parasitic tentacles to any group that shows evidence of control over creativity. But this is not a very satisfactory analysis. Many white groups are isolated, pioneers and individualists and hermits and explorers representing extremes which are rare in other genetic types. Rather than trust, indifference and isolation and quarrelsomeness and small-group bonding (as in soldiers operating in small groups, academics in their small specialisations, administrators in companies and governments, groups of captious and unimportant critics) seem characteristic of many whites. The persistent refusal of groups who know about Jews (on men's rights, alternative physics, teacher critics, business and finance workers, anti-vaccination groups, police groups, 'veteran' groups, legal experts, video directors, scribblers for news and agencies, printers, people querying religions...) to share information is a very significant damper on Jew awareness. Kevin MacDonald, who didn't consider the possibility whites becoming a minority until fairly recently, as he stated in a Youtube, is just one person manifesting the success of the Jewish compartmentalisation strategy of blanket secrecy.
It's well worth understanding the Jewish attitude that “In the Beginning was the Word”. From a technical or scientific viewpoint, this is simple nonsense. In fact it shows a belief in spells, incantations, and recitations, but only as a force against people. It is pragmatism in the Jewish sense: truth is what people can be made to believe, even if it's not true. It's probably the reason that Jewish films and media are full of lies: it's a genetic tendency in Jews to try to deceive. Watch Youtubes of 'SJWs' or 'Antifa' or 'BLM' protestors or Soros-funded bare-breasted Jews: screaming simple slogans, yelling 'let him go' to police with arrestees, making their claims of Nazi or KKK or Mooslim depending on what they're told. It's only now, with forensic techniques, that their simple collective repetitive lying is weakening. Watch these groups when someone says "We have a video"—you can almost taste the genetic dismay, as a cuckoo might feel if a nestling fought back.

So we have an undeclared war between a fanatical group, inbred, with verbal deception combined with a perception of powerful rivals vs scattered groups of multi-skilled people deficient in cohesion. There are many examples of loose alliances between the two main rival groups. As with fights between different species—anaconda vs jaguar, mongoose vs cobra, buffalo vs crocodile, strangler figs vs trees, aggressive ants vs monkey bands—the outcome is in doubt. It may in fact have no end, in the way that predators and prey can oscillate in numbers indefinitely.

Simple genetic model of Africans: For countless generations, what evolved into human beings must have had minimal ability to think, plan, predict. And Africa has ecological systems which combine an easy climate with difficulties—fast-growing deadly insects, animals, parasites; and little defensive space from competitors. Any human evolution in Africa would have faced such conditions. I'd like to suggest the well-known phenomenon of blacks looting stores in the USA with no apparent understanding that the items had to be made, shipped, stored, paid for, may be genetic, a pattern established over hundreds of thousand of years, described as "gib me dat" combined with "chimping out".

A comment (in The Occidental Observer) described blacks and sports, and a hard-to-describe mental outlook, an immediacy 'grounded in the here and now', unconcerned with the future or anywhere else in the present, people for whom today really is 'the first day of the rest of your life'. Blacks avoid problems. Whites solve problems. Jews cause problems is a simple formula. But there's a difference in learning: whites, when a problem (which may be invented by other parties) has been solved, are programmed to stop, relax, be calm. While Jews seem to be permanently, unendingly, tirelessly on the lookout for damage to do.

[Start of article]
Skirmishes: Jew-Controlled Race Riots Another Buried Issue: controlled manipulation is characteristic of Jews; 9/11 is at this time perhaps the best-known example.
The events of August 13th, Charlottesville, VA ('Right' meeting—contrasted with Jewish so-called 'left'), omission of comment on landmark destruction, Richard Spencer—from nowhere, a nominal leader— and Kessler, the Virginia Governor a Jew, the disallowing of legally-guaranteed Free Speech, white police forcing whites in contact with 'Antifa' and 'Black Lives Matter', the apparently staged road crash, Jewish media—including the BBC—sloganised comments) were clearly planned
It's worth noticing the absurd 'BLM' paid campaign—blacks kill each other disproportionately. And I think 'Antifake' must have been puzzled, watching the white police drive white freespeechers amongst them, with minimal protection. Probably the Jews paying for Antifake's drugs, or their minimum wage, expected Antifa retards to hit out dangerously, and/or lethally, becoming patsies in legal action or Jewish clampdown or whatever.
It's only Jewish media control that obscured the fact that such actions in the USA have been routine for years. Let's look at a few events, usually named 'black riots' by Jew-naive whites.
Harlem, New York. Started July 18 1964, lasting almost exactly a week, apparently arranged by a 'Bill Epton'. Researchers might like to examine the validity of the triggering event, the outcomes in terms of selective property damage and long-term effects on the area, and of course Jewish plans and gains.
then Watts, in Los Angeles, 11-16th August, 1965.
then Detroit, 23 July 1967, also lasting a week, with selective damage.
and Los Angeles, April and May 1992, sparked nominally by a Rodney King video. Here's an Instauration report, June 1992 which however soft-pedals Jews.
Researchers might extend their news burrowings to 1863 ('New York Race Riots'), 1926 (Harlem), 1943 (Harlem). With modern techniques of evidence collection—such as Youtube, if it is allowed to continue—better pictures ought to emerge of events such as Ferguson. Not 'Jewish lightning', but rather 'Jewish multiple lightning strike storms.' And this is just a part of activities in the USA alone.

[Start of article]
David Irving. Penguin Books, and Lipstadt David Irving rose (or was propelled) to fame in 1963, on the publication of The Destruction of Dresden, published by William Kimber & Co. (Established 1950; then I think in Wilton St, London). David Irving found Lord Cherwell's archives at Nuffield College. Cherwell (real name: Frederick Lindemann) was an adviser to Churchill. Online videos show David's ecstasy, when he was given the key and full access to these records, which he searched, as through an Aladdin's cave, as source material for what became his first four books.

Click for Irving's 'Action Report', which now seems hosted by www.breitbart.com, his more-or-less daily survey—much of it from Jewish online 'news' sources, including, for some baffling reason, absurdly discredited rubbish of the Reuters, Times, Jewish this-and-that type. (Note 3 Nov 2018: This interlude is long over. Breibart is probably just another fake site run by Jews). Be aware that controversy has shifted somewhat to eastern Europe, just as the gas chamber fraud moved behind the 'Iron Curtain' of the Jewish-controlled USSR, as lies about Germany started to rise. Facts about the USSR have been slow to emerge, but will presumably continue to surface. Irving is somewhat entangled with claims about eastern fronts; see his information on Himmler. Nikolai Tolstoy's Victims of Yalta (1977) blurb says repatriation of Soviet citizens (sic) was 'one of the most appalling episodes of World War Two'; Solzhenitsyn's Two Hundred Years Together (2002, in Russian) helps illustrate how Jewish censorship retards historical honesty.

Let's examine Irving's Dresden and that date, 1963, more closely. Note that Dresden deals with whites fighting whites. The sort of material in Other Losses, and in Robert Conquest, and in Hellstorm, was yet to come, at least to the general public. By comparison, Dresden was a minor matter. In 1963, Bertrand Russell had discovered American atrocities in Vietnam, though he missed the Jewish control aspect and things like the Jew York Times. To this day despite the Gulf of Tonkin incident being widely believed to be a fraud, there have been few if any recommendations of investigation and punishment. Another important issue may be the 30-year rule on secrecy of UK archives; certainly 1933 archives held secrets, which would have to be managed. Looking at the 1963 American Jewish Yearbook: its principal concern is 'race relations', NAACP and race mixing (not of course for Jews), Jewish populations in Greater Washington, Baltimore, Detroit, and Miami (75-80,000). There is little mention of the Vietnam War, so lucrative to Jews, or paper money, or the small matter of Kennedy's murder (22 Nov 1962). Its clear that publicity for Dresden coincided with concealments in the Jewish publicity industries.

David's other books included Accident. The Death of General Sikorski (1967) and The Destruction of Convoy PQ17 (1968). Irving (and Cassell Publishers) was sued for libel by Capt Jack C. Broome in October 1968, and the PQ.17 case was heard in 1970. Irving lost £40,000, despite the fact that (according to a Youtube of a talk given by Irving) he was told he "need not fear the outcome" since "three firms of lawyers held the view that passages based entirely on documents" [would not be libellous]. This of course could not have been a promising outcome from a law case. But he later easily won another libel case, I think vs Gitta Sereny and the Observer, a newspaper owned by the Guardian.
There have been other war-related disputes, though certainly most would never get to court. An example is The Minister and the Massacres (1986) by Nikolai Tolstoy, on Croats and others sent to their deaths in the USSR. A lawsuit in 1989 was held before a jury: a problem with jury trials is that the jury's reasoning is not published.
David Irving's 'watershed' (his word) was the publication of Hitler's War (1977), after which 'buckets of slime' were verbally poured over him, along with outbursts of violence. He fought back by legal action, protests to publishers and newspapers and governments, and setting up his own publishing company—and then had problems with printers being warned off printing his books, and with distribution and bookseller difficulties—it's not difficult to imagine the activities characteristic of Jews. On legal actions, try the search engine on Irving's website fpp.co.uk, for "Irving vs" though by far the majority are the Penguin/Lipstadt case.

All this culminated in his lawsuit for libel against Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books, publishers of Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (1993), because St Martin's Press, publisher of his book Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich, breached his contract, as a result of Lipstadt's book. An odd fact is that Lipstadt hadn't even heard of Irving when she compiled her book; she shoehorned material in, as instructed. Note that Penguin books has a long pro-war propagandist history, extending from before the Second World War.

Some links in date order from David Irving's website, fpp.co.uk (all open in new windows) –
• An account of a talk by Lipstadt in Australia, in July 1994: the famous $1,000 challenge over her fake claims over the Auschwitz 'gas chamber'.
• Irving's September 1996 'Statement of Claim' against Lipstadt and Penguin Books. Penguin must have decided to contest this. There followed a number of "Preliminary Hearings", which I presume were confidential to the court; Irving spoke of them in a Youtube video of one of his talks, I think recorded in Alabama. David said one of the reasons for Lipstadt's silence was contained in the words 'Kol Nidre'; 'her lawyers warned her she might be arrested for having sworn a perjured affidavit on her Discovery'.
• A mysterious "research report" provided to Lipstadt confidentially ('don't let this fall into the wrong hands') by Canada's Simon Wiesenthal Centre. (October 1996). Part of the discovery process. http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Discovery/DL/0500.html
• 500 word summary of Irving's case, required 'under the new Civil Procedure Rules': (1998) http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/docs/summary.html.
• Gray's suggested list of points in dispute: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/issues020300.html.
• http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/transcripts/index.html are the daily trial transcripts, January-April 2000, spell-checked and corrected by Irving. These are a bulk download, i.e. a long file. There's also a drop-down menu, by day number, but unindexed.
• David's edited version of the trial verdict: http://www.fpp.co.uk/trial/judgment/Lipstadt_judgment.pdf. At the bottom of page 2 is David's amusing and bemusing list of errors in the Judgment of Tuesday 11th April 2000. He is a documentary historian!
• David Irving explains the fight so far. http://www.fpp.co.uk/ActionReport/AR19/items/recent.html July 2000 account, after the trial, before the appeal.
• Rather typical online diary entry, Aug 1st 2004. Irving trying to recover personal and archive materials from Jews. http://www.fpp.co.uk/ActionReport/AR26/RadDi1.html
• Items on the 'ineffably gullible' Professor Richard Evans: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/Evans/, who hadn't even heard of Albert Speer.

Parts of the Jewish Establishment
• Wolfson College, in west Cambridge, England is a graduate college—its President is, or was, Richard Evans. It seems to be pretty much all Jewish, something like a RADA training ground for the theatre of Jewish frauds. (There's another Wolfson College due north of central Oxford, also for graduates).
• Although Richard John Evans sounds Welsh, several generations of 'Jews' have entered Britain more or less covertly, and name-changing of course permits many nests of crypto-Jews to remain hidden. It's entirely possible Evans is one such. Someone with Miles Mathis' skills might muse over this possibility.
• Irving's site (www.fpp.co.uk) and books face some censorship. Amazon has discontinued a list of Jew-truth books, notably on the holocaust™—probably part of the ongoing fraud, which seems to be aimed at creating yet another Jew-written religion.
• Youtube has been removing some videos, for example my fashionably-titled video on Eric Hobsbawm, the Jewish pseudo-historian JEW SHOCK: (((Historian))) (((Eric Hobsbawm))): (((Russian))) Revolution-Jewish Evil (((Communism)))
• Establishment churchmen form another branch of the Establishment, such as it is. The connection is with their ridiculous Jewish-authored works. Allow me to quote PaleoAtlantid (April 29, 2017):
It has been said before but needs repeating; all the mainline Christian denominations, not only the formerly conservative RCC, have made a knowing and willing alliance with evil. Most of these churchmen really are monsters, they care nothing for the birthright of European infants or the peace and security of those elderly Europeans and the working class who bear the brunt of immigration.
These elite ecclesiastics can retreat to their lavish palaces while we and our kin are subjected to displacement and dispossession in our homelands. Lands our ancestors have inhabited, sweated, fought and died for thousands of years. This is the thanks we get from these ungrateful bastards. Clearly they couldn't give a shit about us. Well, these clergymen and their supporters in government have by their actions forfeited any legitimacy. Why are Catholics and Lutherans in Germany still paying the Church Tax? Time to kick these bishops in the butt, or where it really hurts, in their wallets.

Readers might like my own detailed description, written at the time, with daily notes and courtroom commentary, the trial text of which is unaltered apart from removing line numbers and a few attempts at corrections, which I abandoned. Irving was plagued by legal irregularities, but I've tried to present an observer's view.

Repercussions from the trial. Before Internet, this trial would have been swept aside, remaining only as footnotes in Jewish-controlled books, newspapers, and TV junk. It was overshadowed a year or two later by the 9/11 false flag/psyop. Youtube started in early 2005. In each case, there has been an immense flowering of comment; and the equipment available to ordinary consumers has opened up astonishing possibilities of exchange of information and analysis. At present (2017) Jewish-run outfits are obviously puzzled what to do. Google for example, with difficult-to-challenge vast data storage, still runs patently false stories—look up 9/11, for example. But it doesn't yet ban true material. Youtube is fairly good on 'alternative' stuff. Of course there are rumblings—EIG's buying up of webhosts, for example. I won't even attempt to predict what will happen.
Holocaust Revisionists and ordinary skeptics have shot up in numbers. The three-month case allowed Londoners, and overseas visitors, to meet and exchange notes. A good example is Lady Renouf, charged up with newly-acquired activist knowledge. Through the barrage of propaganda, a lot of people noticed Lipstadt never said a word. Legal critics must have increased, and there must be more awareness of law as an empirical practice, bearing a similar relation to idealistic jurisprudence as manufacturing and marketing technology does to science. I would hope naive people who parrot about 'inalienable rights' and 'freedom' and their 'proud war service' and 'democracy' will receive delayed-action shocks. All this of course is only for readers; film/video of court cases in not permitted in the UK. Which allows scope for the Jewish film industry.

Questions for Lipstadt. The following three suggested questions are taken from David's website (July 12th 2017) for a South Africa radio phone-in:-
• “Professor Lipstadt, is it true that you were ordered to swear an Affidavit on your Discovery, that you did then Swear that Affidavit, and is it true that your lawyers consequently told you that Mr Irving might have proof of relevant documents which you had illegally and fraudulently withheld from your Discovery, and that for that reason your lawyers cleverly advised you not to go into the Witness Stand, as that would expose you to an immediate prosecution for perjury, and four years in prison? Was that the actual reason for your silence?”
• “Professor Lipstadt, is it true that at the public meeting in Atlanta which opens the film, Mr Irving actually challenged you to show the audience the document you had just told them untruthfully that you have in your possession, and he offered you $1,000 cash if you could do so.”
• “Professor Lipstadt, Is it true you were not awarded your costs at the end of the main trial? Isn’t that unusual? How much were those costs (answer: about $13 million). — The British publisher, a co-defendant in the libel action, was awarded their costs.”

Is/was David Irving a crypto-Jew Agent? I personally don't think so. But there are several reasons people might think so:–
• Hitler's War has many passages which can be interpreted as anti-Hitler, attributing malicious motives to him;
• Irving makes gentlemanly assumptions on the conduct of the war, which seem to ignore some realities, for example that 'we' were 'honour-bound' to support Poland, despite the obviously unrealistic basis for the pledges. He thinks it outrageous that Churchill issued his 'advance to the coast' order, without informing 'our French allies'.
• David Irving seems to assume WW2 was a standalone event, without factoring in the Jewish attitudes of a continual policy against whites, irrespective of who they were. It's now known for example that non-white invasion was a Jewish policy since at least the end of the First World War. And that the policy of 'nuclear weapons' was started before the Second World War.
• His statements about killings of Jews based (as he admits) on one admittedly highly suspect document) in the east seem to ignore the possibility that Jews were moved east, and 'worked' there, just possibly wiped out by Stalin, in case they might have favourable comments about Berlin. As far as I know, Hadding Scott's "Talking Frankly" about David Irving, A Critical Analysis of David Irving's Statement on the Holocaust (CODOH, May 2016) is the best-known account of such doubts, including the likelihood that Irving was maltreated. Here's some material (too long for here) You fools do not think. ... you DON'T ASK RELEVANT QUESTIONS. ... You don't ask the obvious question: "What is the German Wehrmacht doing with a jewish staff running its headquarters in Latvia? in Jews in Russia and eastern Europe by Indrek Pringli illustrating doubts.
• The lack of USSR/ eastern European records, if indeed they were ever kept—Irving's archival research in Moscow was mostly into captured German information (Conquest and Bacque and others helped with this).
• Miles W Mathis (see later) and others have speculated on possible Jewish family entanglements of the Irving line.
• David displays a rather regrettable tendency (in my view) to flatter people undeserving of flattery; such as the late Donald Cameron Watt, Arthur Schlesinger, and other 'historians'. If this is a mistake, it's one I try to avoid.

David Irving continues to uncover: he registers his surprise at the late recognition of the threat of Jews to Germany—formally listed in a 1935-1936 target list as 7th, behind Freemasons, the Catholic Church, Conservative reactions, and others. (See Youtube on 25 questions Q & A Himmler recorded 24 Aug 2013, at about 22 minutes, on Heydrich's papers in Moscow. Until 1937 or 1938, when Jews started assassinations, the "Gestapo and SS were hand in glove with Jews."
This suggests to me that Hitler was encouraged because he was moderate—many Germans, facing the Jewish 'Communist' threat, and awareness of Jewish actions in WW1 (e.g. Warburg brothers advised both President Wilson and the Kaiser; Jews promoted the entry of the USA into the war), must have wanted far more serious action against Jews. The partial list (full list to be in Himmler, when it is published) suggests the problem was how to deal with collaborators of Jews—assuming the Catholic Church was in hock to Jews. And Irving—as with almost all non-Jews—probably was underinformed as to the utterly horrific situation in the USSR and eastern Europe; there were Jews from Germany fighting there—who knows what odd events transpired.

[Start of article]

Early Christianity and 'Thugs'—Does this passage from Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire remind you of other Jewish activities?
... The archbishop [Ambrose], who refused to hold any conference or negotiation with the instruments of Satan, declared, with modest firmness, his resolution to die a martyr rather than to yield to the impious sacrilege; and Justina, who resented the refusal as an act of insolence and rebellion, hastily determined to exert the Imperial prerogative of her son. As she desired to perform her public devotions on the approaching festival of Easter, Ambrose was ordered to appear before the council. He obeyed the summons with the respect of a faithful subject, but he was followed, without his consent, by an innumerable people: they pressed, with impetuous zeal, against the gates of the palace; and the affrighted ministers of Valentinian, instead of pronouncing a sentence of exile on the archbishop of Milan, humbly requested that he would interpose his authority to protect the person of the emperor, and to restore the tranquillity of the capital. ...

Notes on Thugs, Mobs, Myrmidons, and Mercenaries. Notes on Assassinations. As we learn powerful lessons from today's Jew-controlled world, we can translate these lessons to the past, and perhaps understand it better. Or perhaps for the first time.
I've described the Thuggee cult in my file of Jews, as an example of a well-researched secret parasitic cult. 'Mob' is an abbreviation (which annoyed Dr Johnson)—Brewer's Phrase and Fable says it's an abbreviation of mobile vulgus, Latin for 'the fickle crowd'. ‘The term was first applied to the [ordinary] people by members of the Green-ribbon Club, in the reign of Charles II.’ 'Mobile' (pronounced something like 'mobilly') is translated as easily moved, changeable; it obviously might apply to rented or hired groups. Let's see how this might apply to covert Jewish puppet groups of the past.

Note on leaders: whenever a large group of people is necessary, in practice there are a few leaders, simply because it's impossible for most followers to find out what's happening. This is as true with religions as with armies and with corporations and bureaucracies and secret groups. The traditional lie has been that (for example) low ranks in armies and navies know what they're doing. In fact, of course, they often don't, as the simpletons in the US and UK armies and navies prove: they just obey orders, for example acting as ferries in co-operation with people smugglers and their boats. Similarly with religions: Jews rely on an army of ignorant Jews to carry out Talmudic plans; so do Catholics and all the rest. And with secret groups: many Freemason/ Common Purpose types need to be told they are 'leaders'. Many people don't seem to see that chanting mobs of rented masked Antifa or SJW types do NOT have any real beliefs—which is why they support the most absurd contradictory positions, for example supporting child rapists, because, in this case, Jews like Soros want to force nonwhite immigration. At the other end of the scale, many people seem to imagine that (say) Churchill, Stalin, Woodrow Wilson, Reagan, Thatcher, Nelson Mandela were genuine leaders. In fact they were all puppets of Jew finance.

Here are a few examples of Jew-controlled thugs in action:-
• Sicarii Dagger-wielding murderers who relied on confusion to escape
• Jewish Ritual Murder I recommend Arnold Leese on this topic. There must however be censored medieval sources of information
• 'The Haymarket Martyrs', USA Chicago, USA, May 4, 1886: Chicago policemen vs eight foreign ('German speaking', i.e. probably Jewish) 'anarchists'. An online 'revisionist' story concerns Timothy Messer-Kruse, curious to investigate courtroom events, for six weeks.
• Jews in Czarist Russia
• Jews and the Boer War
• Jews, suffragettes, white feathers
• Jews in Cable Street, London
• Yagoda, Beria, Kaganovich
• 1960 Cato Manor, in Durban, and Sharpeville Massacres

My very incomplete assassinations list. Jewish Murders and Mass Murders (2013 - yes, I wrote that in 2013!)

There is a policy of this sort in South Africa now (see Jan Lamprecht on this) and of course Palestine. Projecting this attitude back, it seems clear enough that many sackings, battles, and so on were essentially thugs seizing assets. Obvious enough, but deliberately hidden by jargon.

Ramsay's Nameless War has examples of manufactured funded mobs based on Jewish actions in the past, in England, France, Russia, Germany, and Spain.

[Start of article]
Expert Witnesses. Civil Servants. Public Inquiries. Pseudo-Authentication An interesting byway presented by many legal cases is that of the 'Expert Witness'. When David Irving prosecuted Lipstadt and Penguin, Kevin MacDonald was called as an expert witness. But Rampton said "No questions", to MacDonald's visible surprise. A good witness, in the pragmatic sense, is one who confirms whatever the establishment wants: they provide a shield and justification, for fluoridation, vaccination, BSE, AIDS, or whatever. Many decisions on (e.g.) insecticides are made by civil servants who didn't really have much idea what they were talking about. This conforms to the Jewish idea of law: once the propaganda has swayed the simple goyim, there's no turning back—from Pearl Harbor, or a fictional sea attack off Vietnam, or some lie about holding hands up and black violence—no further negotiation is allowed, if Jews think it's in their interest.
And of course Jews have the 'Kol Nidre' get-out clause—the 'Board of Deputies of British Jews' for example must make non-Jewish judges sigh. (Another technique is simply not to call serious witnesses to testify, as in the joke enquiry chaired I think by Kissinger into 9/11.)

[An older link, 2012-ish Public Inquiries into Wars

[Added 1 July 2017] In Britain, Sir Martin Moore-Bick appears to have been selected to lead the Grenfell Tower fire public inquiry—Grenfell Tower having a similar fingerprint set to 9/11, with property development implications combined with Jewish policy on non-white invasions in Europe. I would hope a team of competent Internetters and architects/ lawyers/ and people with inside knowledge will be able to report on this.

[Start of article]

Bertrand Russell on 'Amalekites'
Russell had very little serious awareness of Jews, but in his book Power discusses 'The moral code towards enemies', with the Old Testament unsurprisingly leading. After a list of killings for 'their abominations', Russell selects the story of Saul, who annoyed 'the Lord' by being insufficiently thorough—he left Agag the king of the Amalekites alive, along with some animals. (Russell quotes Deut vii 1-4., 14 and 1 Samuel xv 8-11; though without saying what happened to Agag.)

Russell, like most Victorians, had no grasp of the genetic evolutionary roots of human impulses. He thought all tribes were more or less the same, and destined to go through similar stages, from primitive savagery to full mature civilisation. I think he believed the Old Testament was characteristic of all pre-Christian peoples. Anyway; the story of the Amalekites evidently is part of the verbal universe of recent Christianity.

Note: Jews seemed to regard 'The Lord' (as the translation has it) as only an intermittent presence, one of many—the others are never mentioned—doing his rounds like an inspector, being irritable, annoyed and verbally violent.
It's curious to compare this 'G-d' with the Christian God, as developed after centuries of philosophical mastication. Compare early and late 'Superman' Comics: the first Superman, like the Jewish 'Lord', could (e.g.) run as fast as an express train, and jump long distances, and see with special specs. The refined Christian God was supposed to exist everywhere, see everything, and know everything, including the past and future.

Michael A. Hoffman II As with Hilaire Belloc, Michael A Hoffman is a convinced Roman Catholic, though of German extraction rather than French. Hoffman believes (for example) the Ascension of Jesus Christ is necessary to Christianity. He believes (another example) that Conversion is a definite mental event. Also as with Belloc, this gives him an interest in Jews, in, I think, a traditional sense, i.e. not Khazars, or for that matter other possible convert groups. The downside is that judgements on such things as paganism, authentic Catholicism, God in the flesh, 'the Occult', Babylon, usury, and so on appear to be based circularly on the starting-point 'Faith'. Anyone who sees 'sacred' texts are fiction, on similar emotional bases to patent medicines for the soul, and/or Sunday school and job and cult recruitment appeals, with unsuccessful attempts at sciences and math and language, cannot, I imagine, have sympathy for portions of these books.
This is very unfortunate: the world needs a guide to the freakish world of aggressive inbred parasites, mediated by the Talmud. A handbook of Jewish strategies and tactics, with real-world examples, would be very valuable. Many examples float around Internet—pre-emptive announcement of some crime, so the goyim can't say they weren't warned—returning to past triumphs to show how wonderful they are—murders of critics—group unity in lying—avoidance of censuses and other statistical fakery—ensuring bureaucratic support for crimes is reliably Jewish—but I know of no key historical handbook for decoding Jew crimes by interpreting Jew media.

BUT Hoffman is interested in the past: Jews of the last few centuries may have different ideas—we can't assume that past writings are a guide to present activities, especially since conditions have changed so much: think electronic money, the possibility of huge population movements, far easier than before, and information movements. Unfortunately I don't think his work is as helpful as it ought to be.

Interestingly, Hoffman is aware of the idea of race wars; in fact, I remember first reading the idea of the World Wars as white population reduction wars in his writings. I doubt if this can be Roman Catholic doctrine, though. Note that his books are to be paid for: I can't blame Hoffman, but this means the material he considers of most value is least likely to spread through cyberspace.

Hoffman's website is Revisionist History®: beyond the gatekeepers. His books include a reprint of Talmud Tested by Alexander McCaul, 'The Victorian Eisenmenger'. It's disconcerting to find McCaul starts his list of weekly pieces with this: SALVATION IS OF THE JEWS. Amongst all the religious systems existing in the world, there are but two deserving of attentive consideration, and they are both of Jewish origin, and were once exclusively confined to the Jewish nation. They are now known by the names of Judaism and Christianity; but it must never be forgotten that the latter is as entirely Jewish as the former. ... It seems Hoffman's venture is to convert Jews to Christianity. This may be a long job! But the plain fact is that Hoffman is still psychologically dependent on Jews, as his Roman Catholic Church has been for all its life, and this raises the suspicion of Jewish money influences over the whole life of the Churches.
[Note: I've uploaded a simplified version of The Talmud Tested here: 1866 Talmud Tested. It doesn't include non-alphabetic characters, and has some scanner errors. But the general reading is OK.

Hoffman's own books include: Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit (1100 pages; I don't know the word count), and a shorter version, Judaism's Strange Gods (400 pp). And Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not. And the most recent The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, "Softcover, 723 pages. Illustrated with 42 rare photos, many in color. Comprehensive index." This history is in part a study in the laboratory of human delusion where five or more mutually contradictory beliefs are held by the papists; where monk Martin Luther's Augustinian Superior General is a leader of the Cryptocracy; where the Kabbalah and Talmud are advanced by pontiffs known to consensus history as Judaism's toughest adversaries, and where the primordial malignity of Pharaonic Egypt becomes the secret religion of the robber Church of Rome, which usurped the genuine Catholic and Apostolic Church of Dante, Aquinas, Francis of Assisi and Anthony of Padua.

Michael A. Hoffman has his serious online review of the movie Denial, on CODOH's site inconvenienthistory.com. Hoffman concludes, unlike most 'mainstream' reviewers in the Jewish media, that 'the imps of contrariness have seen to it that Denial rehabilitates Irving. ... Denial gives new impetus to World War II revisionism... alerts curious minds to the existence of a substantial body of dissent, going so far as to feature Mr. Irving's website on-camera, as well as the covers of his books'.
Michael Hoffman notes the failure of Lipstadt to say anything to anyone apart from her circle of 'experts', and notes the absurdity of her 'survivor' remarks—none were called, because all were liars, as had been established in court in Canada. But he doesn't discuss the subtle ways deliberate distractions are inserted into films: David's website's online section (at this time of writing) lists online reviews of the film—search for Denial, with a capital D—all more or less hostile to Irving—surprise!—including (just one example) Rampton's son, described as an 'arts journalist'. Irving's 'Online' section lists four lies—#1 Irving's father not returning after 1945; #2 & #3 Lipstadt claiming to have a blueprint of a gas chamber; #4 Lipstadt shown as claiming there was no libel, when four instances of libel were proved, but not a fifth. I've already seen Youtube comments confidently asserting that Irving's father left his family, and that he's a joke. These may have been planted, but clearly that's the object.
. Spielberg allegedly helped fund the lawyers: but in a world where Jews can dip trillions of dollars without audit, I'd guess such attributions are aimed at naive lovers of rubber sharks, caricature Germans, and smelly outhouses.

An important claim from Hoffman is that Lipstadt in effect called for a Jewish 'holy war', jihad-like, against Irving, by comparing him with an Amalekite. Here's Hoffman's account on the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust website; August 28th 2016. ... Deborah Lipstadt's ominous categorization of David Irving as an "Amalekite." In Judaic theology this is tantamount to calling for his extermination (irony of ironies). In the talk at the Real History gathering, I give examples of Palestinians who were labeled "Amalek" by Israelis and then murdered. Hence, I accuse Debbie the Darling of Human Rights "Holocaust" activists, of being guilty of incitement to murder. ...'

[Start of article]
Movies and Jews Looking at the long century of 'Movies'—cinema and video; many young people don't know about silver halide emulsion techniques, or the invention of sound recordings—is a distressing experience for those who hope for ideals such as beauty and truth. The Hebrew century has bequeathed indifference to ideals on what would be an heroic scale if there had been anything heroic about it. With the simplicity of fanatical race supremacists, 'chosen by G-d', they lie and grab. Others may think about justice, fairness, what makes a decent life; not them. Their influence is evil and far-reaching: freedom, inalienable rights, pride in war service, they work for their money, Goddamn Russians, war whores...

'Denial' is of course just another Jew propaganda film, in a line from, say, Eisenstein. Irving is perhaps over-polite—having a green-screen backed Mr Ugly cast as him is an insult–but everyone experts actors to be prostitutes. The courtroom scenes—judging by the trailer—are in no way accurate. The Lipstadt material has to be misleading to pretend just another Jewish liar is a heroine. (Maybe there was some casting clash: the woman finally selected replaced another. I wondered whether at any time the parrots considering 'they are chosen by G-d' ever wonder why G-d made them so fvcking ugly. This sort of thing is a problem with Islam, too: if Allah will provide, why grab the benefits provided from whites by Jews?)
It's fascinating and depressing to see Jews still control of the official narrative, just as the Jesus myth still influences people who ought to grow out of it. And in control of funding, something of an irrelevance, since Jews can print money ad lib. The underlying theme is that Jews were victims, not the truth, which is they caused vast numbers of deaths. Even the title of Denial is fake; Irving's prosecution of Penguin Books & Lipstadt was of alleged libel, most of which was proven. Denial is in the same portfolio as Justice at Nuremberg, Gentlemen's Agreement, various Eichmanns, Sophie's Choice, Schindler's List, Captain Corelli's Mandolin.
There seems (at present) no odium attached to actors, who in any case, to get into actors unions, have to undertake to follow Jew rules—be non-'racist', to insist on absurd racial quotas, and so on. I suppose it's saddening to be a prostitute, but even more saddening to be an unemployed prostitute.
I'm unlikely to watch this film, though—as someone who was there—I'd be interested to see how accurately, if at all, the courtroom and site of the Royal Courts of Justice were shown. My notes would be too burdensome. Hare, the scriptwriter, seems to be a Jewish Hampstead playwright, used to big subsidies, small sets, and equally small slices of life. No doubt there will be nothing about legal machinations to obscure the truth, the framing of laws to favour Jews, and the influence of money. Many Jews like law precisely because it offers scope for frauds: note the joke that, if the law exists to make things fair, the USA, with huge numbers of lawyers, must be very fair. Some of these people are acted in Denial, of course. Anthony Julius, author of a jejune work on literary 'anti-semitism', for example.
Another existential difficulty with film is the absence of the unpredictability of the actual events. In real-life courts, "What will he say to that?" is a natural question, which actors doing their lines cannot (in my experience) simulate. Though Rampton's rather transparent train-of-thought derailing interruptions may be easier to act.
Many people believe, I think wrongly, that 'Holocaust Denial' is explicitly illegal in many countries. It's easy to see why the real situation is less clear-cut. Consider the city of Kotragar in central Asia, completely destroyed by Jews before under Stalin. This event was kept very secret: in fact, I just made it up. Would Jews want legal penalties against anyone discussing "Kotragar"? Obviously not; they would want it to remain hidden. This sort of thing explains why laws on censorship are vague; many crimes have been hidden, and vagueness is necessary for concealment: there must not be something analogous to the Roman Catholic 'Index Expurgatorius'.

The court transcripts are online (I believe this is true for Zundel's trials too) so online burrowing is fairly easy. This is my website's material on Irving's libel trial.

[Start of article]
Jewish World Plans: Wars, Religions, Lies. Examples of Induction from Europe, USA, and Russia What can students of Jews do? Some hints—
• Remember the Jewish Continuist mindset. This is a mixture of their own secret personal information; more or less mythical history; and stories for consumption by 'goyim', mostly untrue and lachrymose. There are also, inevitably, huge gaps and omissions, necessary for any group with a specialist mindset concentrating only on exploitation and parasitism. It's a strange combination, but has been terrifyingly effective. Try to remember Jews are likely to perceive events as a continuum. Don't be surprised if anti-white policies crop up continually and over long periods of time. Don't be surprised if anti-European policies continue indefinitely: propaganda against Germany, for example, two wars against Germany, non-white parasites forced into Germany, Jewish control over a supposed European Union, and so on. You may think World War 2 was 1939-1945 or some variant; Jews think it was one small interlude. You may think the Black Death was an isolated event; Jews don't. To quote 'RoyAlbrecht' (Occidental Observer, 2017-09-17) ‘.. we are dealing with an enemy that eats, breaths, sleeps and sh!ts murder theft and mayhem upon those it has labeled the enemy. ..’
• Stories, Parables, Tales. Jewish writings contain large numbers of stories, mostly in standardised format: consider for example Esau, selling his birthright 'for a mess of pottage', Moses bringing 'tablets down from a mountain', 'waters which were under the firmament' separate from 'the waters which were above the firmament'. These short-term memory textual chunks may be a genetic bias in Jews, accounting for their supposedly high verbal IQ. Certainly many Holohoax fraudsters issue their lies in prepackaged chunks.
I've included some articles on my site by 'Arch Stanton', describing technical Talmudic actions, but like many Americans he doesn't seem weaned from Jewish 'Jesus' stories.
• Plans and Stratagems Made From Mnemonic Stories. The repetitive style of Jewish activities is often, perhaps always, based on predetermined stories.
• Repeat ordering of goods of some sort; then a large order; then skipping off without paying. One example is an Australian cash fraud, where a bank got used to receiving unsorted notes from a Jew; another is a South African story, of large orders to several suppliers, accustomed to smaller orders—followed by departure to Israel; another is an account in H.A. Lane.
• Another is the financial system of secretly funding opposite sides in wars—eventually the warring sides are likely to find they are fighting with the same weapons.
• Another is of course secretly funding one side, with some Jewish aim in mind: Japan was funded to fight Russia, because Jews hated the Tsar. Britain and France were funded to ruin China, to foist opium onto it. Britain was funded against South Africa, to get gold and diamonds.
• Another is medium-term (100 years?) actions against some aspect of life of host populations. Controlling their land and food; controlling their banks; acting with would-be elites; perhaps inventing a new religion or attitude or 'saint', from race mixing to Quakers to Churchill. These actions may include, at the present time, use of puppet front men—think Mandela, Obama—rentacrowd fake demonstrators with printed signs, usually in English, fake academics and writers, and crisis actors.
• How Jews Operate.

(1) Jews spread as a layer across many societies. It's a different model of a national group. Understand that—and note that isolating these groups from each other will help.
(2) Jews know whites often operate in separate groups, of experts, careers, skills, clubs. Connecting them together may help.
(3) Jews aim to control other groups; they may hide behind non-Jews, change their names, learn local languages and manners, etc). 'Doxxing', monitoring synagogues etc may counter Jew control.
(4) In each white group, Jews try to bar debate if possible: white teachers for example may understand Jewish tampering, but never talk about it. White doctors know about Jewish frauds, but don't discuss them. White police may come to understand Jews. White military types may know about Jewish violence and wars. White businessmen know examples of Jew fraud, but don't talk about it. White media workers know Jews tell lies, but never discuss it. White university administrators know about Jewish money and maybe the Fed. White historians and archaeologists know there are many documents, monuments, artworks that Jews want to destroy. Whites in finance ... etc etc. Be aware of this possibility and try to counter it.
(5) Jews try to occupy the top of important power structures: all US government departments are led by Jews, for example. Obviously, this must be opposed.

• Jews can't publically celebrate themselves. They can't write autobiographies of frauds, crimes, warmongering. Try to imagine an honest Jewish 9/11 biography, or honesty from Neocons. For all time, their lives have to be secretised. Vanity though must surely tug e.g. the Rothschilds to record their triumphs against goys somewhere, however risky. Perhaps this doesn't matter; but perhaps it does, and it's worth bearing in mind the potential weapon against Jews.
• Jew collaborators can't celebrate themselves, either. Consider simple Russians who had no option but collaborate with Jews for GULags, against Germany, and against Russia itself. And simple Americans, used as mass murderers in South America or South-east Asia or the Middle East. Jewish Bolsheviks, propagandists, and industrialists must keep quiet: the Federal Reserve and Jew York Times, nuclear and vaccine frauds, block their way. Neither set of people can be honest.

[Start of article]
Is The Occidental Observer's Kevin MacDonald a Covert Agent? The Occidental Observer is here; it has a well-established academic image, evidently intentional, and with a quarterly publication, and a bookstore (6 titles at present). The centrepiece and main man is Kevin MacDonald, known for his series of books, including The Culture of Critique, dating from 1994-2002. His 2004 monograph of three essays, Understanding Jewish Influence: A Study in Ethnic Activism, is published by The Occidental Quarterly.

It's obvious enough that pressure is being applied by US Jews against Americans' First Amendment rights, in the same way it has been applied in Europe to try to censor information about Jews, notably of course on the 'Holocaust', where the Jewish strategy is clearly to keep repeating lies, particularly to young people, in the hope of quieting criticism. In fact, it's this Jewish policy that helped convince me that Christianity was imposed by Jews in the same way, about 2,000 years ago, by repetition of tribal scribblings. It remains to be seen whether this will succeed, but unquestionably there's a chance, and a new Holocaustianity religion may trap the world, perhaps for thousands of years. Google, Facebook, Amazon, Youtube have yielded under pressure, but not at all completely. Metapedia.org seems to have been victim of a hostile takeoever, though, typically, details are sparse: Rightpedia.org seems to be doing its best to replace it.

As I type, the previous three TOO pieces have been Doused and Denounced (by Ray Wolters; on Sociobiology), Brave New Britain: Vibrant Enrichment in Manchester and London (by Tobias Langdon, on two (false flag) attacks), and 'Heaping Up Its Own Funeral Pyre': Britain, Islamic Terrorism, and the Cult of Pacifism (by Andrew Joyce; same subject, with absurd claims of pacifism). (Joyce has written well on pogrom revisionism and world war revisionism, though on inspection not originally; however, his work on Jew-owned shipping after 1945 and unelected black immigration I think was his own. His piece on the Empire Windrush is revisionist work at its finest. But Joyce hasn't understood the depth of Jewish corruption: he really seems to think 'depth and intensity of fame' is an independent variable). Wolters' piece is on 'biologians' vs 'culturalists'. However, he doesn't identify Jews as the moneyed force behind censorship in human genetics studies, making his article more or less worthless. Other recent articles condemn Islam, but go to great lengths to avoid mentioning the Jews who, as one, promote Islamic immigration on a huge scale. There have been commenters, drawing attention to the moderator's selective bias (there seems to be just one mod, proud of doing his work for nothing). A good example of a resident troll is 'David Ashton' (this is the name of an official sociologist, I think, but the commenter denied being that person) who invariably promotes a pro-Jew viewpoint, typically of Jew lies or Jew money frauds. Another good example is 'Pierre de Craon', who invariably promotes what he thinks is a Roman Catholic view—such as, recommending prayer.

One crucial idea of the site is that whites are 'pathologically altruistic'. I think it's fair to say this is misdiagnosis on a Himalayan scale: after all, during WW2 whites fought each other, and other races, white white weapons, probably more lethally than in all previous history.
(A recent posting is on Dresden, though this is more of a focal point than an examination of the entirety of the vicious cruelty of the Jewish Second World War.
Here's a disallowed very blunt comment to The Occidental Observer from me, on 'US Heroes': (2 Dec, 2016) I have some difficulty not laughing at this rubbish. A heroic mustached pilot in cowboy boots bombing defenseless rural civilians… an 'alpha male'? I doubt the comment is serious—considering the anachronisms; it's probably a Jew puppet piece, inserted in case American whites start to grow up and understand who their real enemies are, and have been. Jews love 'fallen friends' being celebrated by simpletons: they get their deaths and their money, and do their best to get another stream of vicious simpletons. Surely MacDonald is old enough to have heard of US war crimes?
Here's another disallowed comment (August 10, 2017) ... the ridiculous idea that whites are ‘pathologically altruistic’ when they do what Jews say. ... nobody mentions the similar policies visited on the Koreans and Vietnamese - heavy bombing, firebombs, napalm etc. This of course is a result of Jewish media control. I wonder whether this site’s failure to mention such things is temporary, waiting on further long-outdated ‘revelations’, or a permanent feature?
Another non-reported issue is financial fraud and corruption: 2 Dec 2016, on German nonwhite invaders getting much more than Germans: Bear in mind that Jews print money and control central banks, so the more debt a government accrues, the more payments Jews get. They're so used to this, it seems natural to them. I think this is part of the reason why handouts for invaders are assumed legitimate by the Jew filth. They're accustomed to it, and can't understand that there are limits to parasitism. It's the reason why some MPs and EU people etc assume invaders are 'entitled' to benefits: Jews get them, why not some selected goyim untermensch?

MacDonald's well-known books were published from 1994-2002 (print-on-demand paperbacks available more recently). The site lacks any science—Holocaust, NASA, 9/11, nuclear issues, climate change, some medical issues such as AIDS, fluoridated water, vaccines. It seems to lack any supplementary expertise in religion, having no contributors dealing with Talmudic material in particular, and Jewish Yearbooks and networking, but also Roman Catholicism (much less Russian Orthodoxy).

There are many other issues: not much on BLM and similar organisations based on statistical lies; nothing on supporting (((US))) wars, presumably to bankruptcy; nothing on US bases, NATO, EU and its Jew 'elite'; nothing on Jews in law, junk media, data storage and destruction, archives. Nothing on the impact of (typically) Jews on Africa. Even the comments are low on Jews: a recent piece on Sweden and Swedes blames women, whites, media, kindergartens, virtue signalling—without seeming to realise the whites are paid—and so on, but nothing on Jews in the EU, Jews controlling Jewish jobs and media. Nothing on current bankruptcies, media collapses, the Mexico 'Wall', and other Trump-inspired topics. Instead: Plato, ancient Greeks treated at the naivest level, whites and 'hunter-gatherers' as though that determines the entire environment in pre-history.

Why I think Kevin MacDonald and the Occidental Observer are Controlled Opposition is a long piece by Miles Mathis, expressing considerable skepticism. For example: ... So you see how MacDonald is spinning you. He tells you these half-truths, leading you to his solution: discrimination against Jews! He is acting just like the ADL wants him to act, saying all the wrong things at all the right times. He is leading you toward discrimination as the answer and away from enforcing existing laws as the answer—just as the big boys want it. ...
The deepest problem with the MacDonald approach is insufficient analysis of Jewish power. Jewish power goes back millennia—I have emails from people whose comments were banned, agonising over issues pre-dating 1776. Without such material, the site is hollow; as one illustration of this weakness, consider Bertrand Russell's Jew-unaware comment, 'the entire American nation is on trial' (written 1970, of the Vietnam War). This attitude is common to Americans, under the deluge of Jew lies, but is not appropriate to a supposedly intellectual organisation. The facts the 1960s New York Times, fifty years later, is still more-or-less functioning, under more-or-less the same Jews, and that Kissinger is not executed or jailed, is an indictment of the US way of life. A ridiculous piece by M. Jaggers (31 June 2017) on the decorum of the US government—probably the most crooked regime in the whole of world history—points to the same message. MacDonald's site says nothing deep on Jewish crimes outside the USA. I doubt if Mathis's crit is true in detail; Arthur Butz for example was not sacked from his university, which seems to show some criticism of Jews slips through. But Mathis might as well be correct.

[Start of article]
Breeding and Artificial Races: An Essential but Suppressed Distinction. 'Artificial Selection' applied to Peoples Discussions of race, despite frantic attempts by Jews at suppression, are increasing. And human genetics is an important subject. Just a few notes.

• I'll call 'Artificial Human Races' such races as have been produced by human intervention. Modern African blacks are one example: without white intervention, presumably their populations—their expansion being the highest ever recorded—would have remained at pre-industrial levels. If that intervention were to be withdrawn, presumably there would be pressure downwards on their populations. These are a question of numbers, but there may be genetic changes. Another example is south Africa's 'coloureds', widely supposed, correctly or not, to have been fathered by Jews on helpless black women. And of course Jews must count as artificial, influenced by reading and writing and mental processes. In fact it seems possible that newly-bred populations of 'Jews' could be produced by intensive exposure to Jewish Talmudic books and practices. And Moslems must count as an artificial race, bred under Quranic influences with young mothers and the acceptance of four 'wives' and rape of some unaccompanied girls.

• As must usually be the case in any science, genetic studies in human, animal, and plant life start with the study of outstanding, striking, odd, or repeatable phenomena: polyploidy in wheat, selection of horses or dogs for strength, for digging, for controlling sheep, simplish pencil-and-paper tests. In genetic theory, presumably dominant genes for striking malformations are noticed first, rare recessives and hard-to-detect or microscopic minor oddities later. But mental and temperamental characteristics seem to be the most difficult to pin down genetically. I think this explains why Jewish parasitic behaviour—if that's what it is—has escaped much scientific attention until recently. It's in the same class of phenomena as psychopathy and schizophrenia. At present, I can think of no successful attempts to identify inheritance patterns of (for example) self-deception, or the ability to tell convincing lies. Nobody knows how the brain works; and there are serious doubts over how DNA works; so possibly the best techniques for the present would be the old pre-DNA methods. Meanwhile, there has been detailed work on animals, particularly small animals such as insects. There seems no doubt that new, very striking, evolutionary patterns of parasitism have been found. And if insects can do it, there seems little doubt people could do it.
If I may, I'll adopt a Jean-Henri Fabre-style description of a possible situation. Imagine a situation where a population's skill enables it to live in large groups, and have some control over a large hinterland—towns, food, transport, water, specialisation—but not be able to communicate face to face with anything like all the members. Then outgroups could interweave into the system and live a parasitic life, consuming what surplus there might be. Not unlike maggots of specialised parasitic insects feeding on blood from a proportion of the population. And counter-evolution on both sides might well lead to increased camouflage and behavioural mimicry.

• Complicated animals, with vast amounts of DNA, bring related issues: any specialised or exceptional animals seem likely to not reproduce their special characteristics. It's all very well for geneticists to say that (e.g.) siblings "share half their genes" or whatever claims they make, but if the unshared genes are important, they won't pass on their special characteristics. The number of possible different children of just one couple is astronomical, but I haven't seen any analysis of the results of this. It's notable, although of course kept secret, that Jews' and Muslims' inbreeding leads to vast numbers of defective offspring, as an example.

• There are great problems surrounding human evolution, mostly as a result of inventiveness: human beings can do things other animals can't, including of course talk and listen. Sanskrit, written Chinese, cuneiform languages and all the rest must have had some genetic impact; certainly African tribes which only had oral languages seem to be far behind. Jews in the USSR killed off as many educated Russians as they could: I believe this Jewish behaviour to be genetically-caused, but obviously Jew brains need invention of and/or recognition of enemies, combined with secret planning and aggression. Possibly some sort of tests (perhaps along the lines of pencil and paper IQ tests, or reaction time tests) could be devised, though to date as far as I know anything of that sort would be unfunded.
Other problems—here's a scattering—include (1) since bacteria, viruses, fungi, amoebas, insects can evolve enormously quicker than big animals, how come devastating plagues aren't much more common than they are? (2) Is there a free-floating instinct of (say) curiosity, as cats are said to have an instinct to hunt, independent of hunger? Does such an instinct pop up and grip some subject in the mysteries of croquet, big marrows, football results, winemaking? (3) Is there a dominant, or recessive, hostility instinct, needing enemy recognition and verbal and behavioural cunning? (4) Do Jews move around in a way analogous to prey animals, faster than the prey, and without homes—just temporary residence in Lodges, Meeting Houses, Synagogues, Shtetls? (5) And remember that only a part of any organism's genes are passed on, in sexual reproduction—probably as a stabilising mechanism: children can be very different from their parents. I'm not sure anyone has really modelled the way the vast number of genetic combinations leads to a 'gene pool', though I expect such genetic variations as have shown up in the immense past probably correspond, more or less, to variations which happened to survive.
It's important to realise that Jews have detailed views on genetics. So do most societies, but usually their object is to keep stability, rather than breed selectively. Jews have a tendency to be fanatical about other races: they want them to be damaged and weakened. They love abortion and sexual perversions and risky large-scale medication and poisoning—for others. They pass laws forbidding information on race numbers and race mixing and inherited diseases to be published. They profess to believe in 'biology denial'—and it's amusing to see people like Justice4Men&Boys and Jordan Peterson completely baffled by Jewish media liars. Jews seem to breed for group fanaticism—virtually not one single Jew speaks out about Jew corruption of any sort. It seems analogous to the way sheep collect together, and many fish form shoals. And analogous to some animals which behave analogously, by playing dead, for example.
There are plenty more possibilities: for example, were temple prostitutes money-makers, and did they lead to the idea of maternal descent? Did Jews evolve from shorter-lived races in such a way as to make extreme gargoyle-like old age likely, for example by avoiding risk? Such, in the words of J B S Haldane, is the present position of Western civilization. There has been a complete failure to integrate into its intellectual structure the scientific ideas which have furnished its material structure.

• It's probably true that human races, being biologically young, are not yet in dynamic equilibrium, in the way that other species and their enemies have come to some sort of permanent balance. Even the most efficient predators haven't eaten all their prey; and even the most efficient parasitoids haven't killed off all theirs. BUT we are looking at creatures with shorter lives and longer development times and few intellectual capacities. I don't know of any other creatures than man which parasitise their own species. But that doesn't mean there aren't any. Researchers trying to predict the future should look, not at parasites as they are now, but at the full evolution of parasites, including cannibalism, and including the very beginnings of parasitism leading up to their present-day adaptations. The human races are relatively young, and there may be fairly simple insights, from nature, suggesting actions to avoid catastrophes.

[Start of article]
Miles Mathis and his Internet Intellectual Gold Rush. Is Mathis an Agent? Miles Mathis's website is justifiably popular. He is wide-ranging, including original science hypotheses (mostly physics and chemistry) and his own art, including unflattering commentary on the art industry—I don't think anyone else has identified very high auction values as a possible international money-laundering device.
His revisionist identification of genealogical research as an historical research tool is very refreshing in a world of intentionally misleading abstractions such as capitalism, feudalism, nations, classes, political parties, left, right... His emphasis moves to individual biological units and their connections, of indisputable importance. His abstractions involve families of spooks and 'intelligence' workers, and financiers and Jews; less so military and legal evolutions and revolutions. There's a possible source of error here: his confidence with surnames looks over-confident to me. Anyway, the box (below) is my overview, at about October 2016. He has found a new goldfield, and has collected very many nuggets.
In an analogous way that photographers and cinematographers played a large part in whistleblowing NASA and 9/11, Mathis draws lessons from his portraiture experience, generally involving close inspection of facial details, plus the shapes, sizes, and orientations of human bodies. And he takes advantage of computer image processing to adjust contrasts, gammas, colours and so on, work which would take hours using silver halide techniques. I'm unsure how reliable this work is; or if he has ever worked from retouched, pasted and painted photographs. Mathis has a theory that some online jokers have attempted to damage his work by promoting weak methodologies and absurd comparisons. He takes in the cinema; for example, Triumph of the Will had tens of thousands of extras, arguably making it a fake.
On Feb 16 2017, he uploaded Hitler's genealogy, with excursions into the Beer Hall Putsch fake, and all the other big NSDAP names Jewish, including Goebbels (as a 'gay' actor), Himmler, Hess, and Eichmann, and such people as Moses Hess, and Eva Braun's possible twin. (Mathis likes finding twins—they allow image manipulation. Let's hope cloning doesn't become popular).
And on April 8th 2017, he uploaded his 29-page Vladimir Lenin is Another Fake (updated from 21 June, 2016). 'In addition to Lenin being part of the Russian aristocracy, and the 'Russian Revolution' being a tame affair faked by Eisenstein later, the Romanovs were not murdered and Kerensky was still alive and living in the USA. 'If Russia [sc. USSR] had been a success, we would have expected to see the same thing happen in England, the Low Countries, Spain, etc., with the royals completely phased out. But instead of a raw and ravaging Communism, we have seen Monarchies fronting and co-existing with soft-sold Socialisms–in which theft by the upper classes can be better hidden. Besides, the American experiment has been far more successful than any other, and we can expect the Futureworld to be built along its lines, not the lines of Europe or Russia. It is here that the most wealth is vacuumed from the middle and lower classes into the upper class. The Russian plan didn't allow for that, since the middle and lower classes had little wealth to steal. Once the treasuries had been plundered, the only wealth in Russia was natural resources. That wealth is fantastic, but it isn't as fantastic as the plunderable wealth in the US, since the US has both the natural resources and the human resources that can be easily taken. To achieve that taking, all that is necessary is an all-enveloping propaganda state, by which the populace is conditioned to disempower itself.'
Miles Mathis writes extensively on the USA's history. Miles Mathis on Watergate is (so to speak) typical of his style, though many of his pieces include faked deaths—his John Lennon piece is convincing, and might provide an introductory path to Mathis on JFK—exciting piece on JFK's murder being faked, MLK, Abraham Lincoln, Charles Manson. I'd not be surprised to find legal journals have discreetly-worded articles on how faked deaths might be administered. He is not a full nuclear revisionist, but at least has the idea, and is less likely (I'd guess) to be suckered into account of US nuclear 'secrets' being sent secretly to the USSR by Jewish spies. Other secret material sent to the USSR is of course another matter.
Other notable updated papers (all May 2017) include Was Napoleon Jewish?, Martin Luther King and fake black liberation, and new papers include Richard Spencer Jewish agent, and JFK a homosexual.

Mathis finds actors noteworthy, very likely because he seems to have awoken to the use of actors in propaganda when he investigated the faked Abraham Lincoln assassination: he'd of course noticed Booth was an actor, but disregarded it until his reconsideration. Booth spoke Hebrew and—this is just my guess—may have said "Sic semper tyrannis" rather than something like "Oy vey, look vot I done."
Mathis is fearlessly revisionist: the sample piece below includes: Hambro's son Charlie ... was involved in the Bank of England "bailout" of Slater Walker Bank in 1973, by which the treasury was looted of billions of dollars by these bankers. As with the later US bailouts, we are told the looting was a "financial lifeboat" that "saved the financial system from collapse", but that is all bollocks. It was just a grand theft in plain daylight, with no cover but these media lies. In fact, it had been done before. Charlie learned it from his grandfather, who "saved" Barings Bank in a similar managed collapse in 1891. ...
And Mathis looks at the uses of mass media: Jack London (absurd queer), Mark Twain (rich globetrotter), J K Rowling (spook and puppet head of writing group; hypocritical incidentally in encouraging non-white immigration, but not into her big house—and claiming actors in the films were all British, when many were Jews); Ewan MacColl (fake name, fake folk, part of death penalty removal for ordinary people), Woody Guthrie (Jew fake), Ned Kelly (fake armour; probably to discourage Ozzie secret aristocracy from being acted against, since even the dreaded Kelly failed), Boy George (gender bender Jew in Hampstead house).
Mathis takes some numerology seriously, in my view correctly, since it allows signals in newspapers in any language to be read. And he's shown one way for others: Is Ken Livingstone a Jew, for example? Or 'Bomber' Harris? Or George Galloway? Or 'Professor' Evans? What about John Dewey? Paxman? Attenborough? Pilger? In fact, he seems to have founded a school of similar writers, which is rare for revisionists: Gandhi–Was the Fakir a Faker? is a detailed examination, by 'daddie_o', of Gandhi (and Nehru, and Jinnah) and their wealthy backgrounds and London Inns of Court entanglements.

There are a few revisionist discoveries admitted by 'paid historians': the 'Donation of Constantine', the changes in the 'Lord's Prayer' not to forgive debts, the Roman Catholic Church's action against the Templars, some little-known Amendments to the US Constitution. Miles Mathis has single-handedly outstripped them all. Is he an agent himself? He does get a bit frenzied over 'Nazis' and 'fascism'. But I think it's very unlikely.

More on the stellar exponent of revisionism, Miles Williams Mathis, dependent on the unprecedented access to documents by Internet—books, monographs, news items, biographies, photos—which even the best libraries of the past couldn't match. Internet permits families to be checked for distinctive signs of Jew tampering, biographies to be compared and checked for absurdities, intersections detected between organisations, and so on. Perhaps unexpectedly, the Jew-patrolled Wikipedia is a fertile source for data mining of biographies. An interesting possibility is that monarchs and dynasties may be checked for Jewish infiltration. Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck appear to be Jewish or Jew-controlled pretenders, and the 'Windsors' Jewish, in England, for example. This technique is well-adapted to smallish groups—families, aristocracies, leaders—but less useful for large-scale events, such as wars, invasions, and anything large-scale. If records will be published giving information on corporations, armies, large industries, governments and so on, no doubt data mining could lead to huge advances in understanding. Mathis supplements (1) Biographies with (2) visual clues, derived from his portrait painting, as to facial and body similarities and sizes, and related issues of photo fakery; and (3) organisational procedures and promotions in legal, military, aristocratic family, and intelligence structures. So that—just three examples—Charles Manson, bearded and in prison, is impossible. And the Tate killings were a fake. And the Dresden bombing (or at least photo(s)) were faked.

Examples, from Mathis' site in Oct 2016: occult.pdf Bacon, Dee, Cromwell, and others, and conflicts between landed aristocrats, merchants, bankers, and proto-scientists, with possibly faked documents and specially promoted belief systems (millennarians, puritans...), where 'occult' means something like 'secret intelligence' though Mathis tends to regard all the people as 'spooks', and the aims change over time | French Revolution a first-class re-evaluation the 'Revolution' as a device to fleece the French Roman Catholic Church | Was Napoleon Jewish? looks at France, Poland, Austria, Egypt, and other aspects of Napoleon which may have been misrepresented | Salem witch trials pieces together the probably true story. Hawthorne looks back at Bostonians (and the East India Co), plus Thoreau (1817-1862), and Walt Whitman (1819-1892) | Lincoln is a terrific reassessment of the 'assassination' by an actor in 1865, and Custer of Custer in 1876 | Marx (as far as I know, one of the best pieces on Marx) looks at wealthy industrialists (often of course 'Jews') misleading radicals, as does Labour Party, Noami Klein, Naomi Wolf | Trayvon is on race wars, which Mathis seems to think are not real—he doesn't seem to sense the intentional Jewish prompting. | Taxes is a paper on deliberate lies about servicing interest payments. | Nash.pdf looks at the manufacture of Jewish intellectual 'heroes', in this case based around the film A Beautiful Mind, and fake science, fake economics, and fake prizes and awards. I'm not claiming all his work is correct or original; but it's a relief to see head-on revisionism. | Here are two pieces on planted horror/distraction stories: Sharon Tate and O J Simpson. On June 2016 Mathis posted Lenin and the 'Russian Revolution'. At the time of writing, Mathis is looking at the beginning of the 'American Revolution': Who Was George Washington?.]

I've sometimes wondered if Mathis might himself be an agent: his output is so huge one has to wonder if he was handed bundles of papers and photos and documents by some elderly intelligence crook, fatigued with the effort of deception. He writes Everyone knew that there must be someone behind this cardboard cut-out, someone capable of making real decisions. Half-heartedly we have thought to ourselves that maybe it was Hoover or Kissinger or Greenspan or Cheney, as the case may be, but have never felt satisfied by this. Could Mathis be hiding the Rothschilds, for example? Perhaps it's the fate of Jews to keep their secrets beyond the columbarium, to be as lost to history as the builders of Avebury and Stonehenge?

Extract from a Miles Mathis piece, to illustrate his style. (Reformatted from pdf to HTML).

Roundell Palmer | Arnold Palmer

The first is Roundell Palmer [grandson of 1st Earl of Selborne-RW], the second is Arnold Palmer. Any family resemblance?]

As Minister of Economic Warfare, Palmer selected Sir Charles Hambro [d. 1963], his City colleague, to direct Special Operations. Hambro, of an old British/Scandinavian (Jewish) banking family [Hambros Bank, now Societe Generale] had been a powerful director of the Bank of England working with Montagu** Norman to install and nurture the Hitler regime in Germany and to found the Swiss-based Bank for International Settlements (with several Nazis on its board), through which Nazi loot and SS funds would be used for post-war objectives.

[Miles here: Hambros Bank was known as the diamond bank for its connections to South Africa and the big diamond traders there (all Jewish, of course—Rhodes, Rothschild, Oppenheimer, DeBeers, etc.). After the war, Hambros Bank was one of the top three banks in Europe. Hambro's mother was a Stuart and his grandmother was a Gostenhofer. So these people were not Danish. In fact, the name Hambro was changed from Levi in the late 1700s. That link is from Geni.com, where it is admitted. {Notice that the Hambro pages are managed by a Rhodes.} These Levis link them to Karl Marx and the Philips family. The name Hambro comes from Hamburg, where the family lived before Denmark. These Hambros were also related to the Morgans. Hambro's son Charlie was sent to live with the Morgans in New York City during the war. Charlie was involved in the Bank of England “bailout” of Slater Walker Bank in 1973, by which the treasury was looted of billions of dollars by these bankers. As with the later US bailouts, we are told the looting was a “financial lifeboat” that “saved the financial system from collapse”, but that is all bollocks. It was just a grand theft in plain daylight, with no cover but these media lies. In fact, it had been done before. Charlie learned it from his grandfather, who “saved” Barings Bank in a similar managed collapse in 1891. Charlie's nephew Peter Hambro worked for Hambros Bank until it was absorbed, at which point he went to work for discount house Smith St. Aubyn. Note the name there, which came up my paper on Harry Potter and also above in the ancestry of Gary Player. Hambro then went to work for bullion house Mocatta and Goldsmid. What they don't tell you is that the Hambros probaby are Goldsmids. See here where Hambro's Levi ancestors are also Goldziehers, a variant. As it turns out, the Hambros are also related to the Normans. See Montagu Norman above. That explains their connection. Of course, through the Stuarts, the Hambros are also related to the Palmers. Also to the Townshends, etc.]

The Special Operations Executive was officially disestablished after the Nazi surrender. But Roundell Palmer insisted that its personnel, assassination capabilities, assets, and intelligence arrangements be continued underground in Western Europe, in a quasi-war against the Soviet Union.

The new “intelligence community” was managed from the Privy Council, from the permanent government apparatus that ran the Cabinet and Foreign Office, from White’s Club, and from the Mercers’ haunts and the City board rooms, regardless of elections or political parties. The very existence of MI6, the British Secret Intelligence Service, was not officially acknowledged until 1994

Since writing all the above, Mathis has written a piece on Benito Mussolini (published 14th Sept 2017), showing Mussolini was a Jew, whose Jewish mistress was part of a series of Jews from Venice and the east, and the Jewish Jagiellon dynasty. The 'March on Rome' was no doubt a fake—and his acting a fake—and the bodies hanging upside-down image a fake. Mathis understandably wearies with the details of WW2, including fake jailings (cp. Hitler's supposed jailing of a Rothschild) and fake campaigns and real or alleged assets in Africa.
Mathis is certainly loosening the logjam, working his one-man campaign against the legions of Jew-subservient hacks, who are trying to lash together the creaking timbers.
What a pity his technique can't be applied to the characters used by the Biblical 'Yeshua freak' Jew-subservient types doing what they can to rot the USA's intellect. It's also a pity it's hard to apply to Chinese and Japanese (and other) languages, for westerners. What information on Chinese 'Communism', and post-1945 Jewish 'elites', and trade and technology, might be unearthed, assuming they have genealogical info! Whether something similar might work in Africa, and southern America (including Mexico), and Arab countries depends (I'd guess) on availability of genealogies.

[Start of article]

David Irving on the late appearance of Jews in SS target lists. Another Irving video is Did Germans Build the Wrong Air Force?

Was Hitler an Agent? – Was Hitler a Jewish Agent? This idea has started to surface seriously, and ought to be taken seriously. People brought up with the conventional propaganda of the West naturally enough find the idea ludicrous. I was one of these, and occasionally was quite impolite to exponents of the idea—most of whom, however, as far as I know, weren't incredibly convincing. I don't know about Russians or east Europeans, or people in the Pacific 'theatres' of war.
It has long been part of the propaganda battle that Hitler was funded by bankers. This dates mostly from the period when the NSDAP—National Socialist German Workers' Party, remember— was described as "left wing". And at the time Hitler was widely credited with huge and successful reforms. I believe a British politician during what was called the 'National Government' in 1930s Britain first redescribed the NSDAP as "right wing", probably to the annoyance of non-Jew-puppet Conservatives.
Another part of the propaganda battle is that Germany wanted to take over the world, despite its small size. This seems to be a permanent feature of Jewish propaganda; much the same was said of Vietnam, Iraq, even North Korea.
This Hitler-revisionist view is (I take it) based on the idea that Jews form a nation, as a layer across the world, in detailed networking communication with each other relying, now, on computer information and spying; and supported by Jewish localised propaganda—BBC, German broadcasting, US media, as just three examples. In this way national opinions are controlled, with of course the possibility for local hostility, wars, and so on. Soros's activities in eastern European countries illustrate one version of this. Jews in the US, controlling media aimed at US blacks, illustrate another version—at present, stirring up anti-white violence such as rapes and murders, while simultaneously controlling 'news' to pretend it doesn't happen. Another example is media control in Germany, causing German self-loathing—but also media control in Britain, inducing white British self-loathing. Can we transfer this model to the case of Hitler?
The Suppressed Importance of Hungary. Germany and Austro-Hungary were on the same side in the 'Great War'. Hungary, in the eastern Austro-Hungarian Empire, was in fact larger than Austria, and nearer Russia. The Hungarian Soviet Republic (of Bela Kun and other names; mentioned by Churchill in 1920) failed (and caused Jews in Hungary to move out, contributing e.g. to fake nuclear science, and other frauds, and leaving festering hatred of Jews in Hungary). But perhaps its most important result was caution over Germany: Jewish bankers must have paused, and it may be that Hitler was chosen as a moderate, and then watched. Remember Jews had a long history of invading Germany, and also that Germany had only recently been unified (in 1871; certainly with Jewish involvement) and was a leading economic power. The ramshackle Jewish nonsense of 'Communism', and supposed common ownership of production and distribution, if it had convinced Germans, may have worried Jews: "Oy veh, the goyim may get something out of this, which we can't allow..." Lenin or his scribblers had a revised theory of 'Revolution', that they'd expected it in industrial countries, but, surprise, it just happened in backward Russia. And certainly when Hitler came to power, many Jews were jubilant.
Presumably, whoever controls Jewish world policy aims to maximise deaths of rivals and profits from them, taking into account their power structures: deaths of skilled rivals taking precedence over less skilled; easier profits preferred to difficult profits; and so on. Here are just some examples needing re-examination:–
• Who decided Germany/ Austria/ Hungary has lost the 'Great War'?
• An obvious question is: were the heavily Jew-influenced talks at the 'Treaty of Versailles' intended to lead to more wars, from which Jews intended to benefit?
• What events after the 1916 stalemate prevented Germany's peace terms being accepted? How was Germany (after not being invaded at any point) come to its collapse?
• German debts (1920s hyperinflation) were allowed to be removed by inflation. How come they were allowed to slip out of debts, when others didn't?
• Why is there no overall reckoning of the First World War?
• Why did Hitler kill Brownshirts ('Night of the Long Knives')?
• What exactly was the point of the 'Nazi-Soviet Pact'?
• Some white nationalist sites show machine-gunners, tanks firing, and so on. BUT in all these cases soldiers were fighting other soldiers; there was no direct Jew involvement at all. What possible point could there be in whites fighting each other?
• Could Hitler's repeated peace offers have been intended to keep up the indignation of Germans against the 'Allies'?
• Was Dunkirk permitted to keep up the British strength, so that they were strong enough to attack and defeat Germany?
• For that matter, was German rearmament encouraged with a view to future destruction?
• Many white nationalists favour the invasion and attack on the USSR. But Russians were victims of Jews; what sense did it make to kill ordinary Russians?
• After (and for that matter before) the 'Great War', WW1, many Germans became Jew-wise. After the failure of a Jewish coup in Germany and Austria/ Hungary, a new party, supposedly for the Arbeiter/Workers, may have been made up; Miles Mathis skilfully paints a picture of this possibility—after some name-changing, wealthy Jews fronted the party, and gave it plausibility with Mein Kampf and spurious jailings and negotiations with past German leaders.
• It's possible that the German invasions of eastern Europe and the USSR/Russia involved covert pro-Jewish activity, notably in Poland, Latvia/Lithuania, Estonia as well as Russia.

Very possibly, the natural-enough focussing on national battles enabled the Jewish interest to be left entirely undiscussed. And it was/is easy to distract from: 'German' money sounds localised, even if completely Jewish; 'French' army sounds national, even if partly Jewish; 'British' Empire sounds British, even if the finances were Jewish and transferable to the USA; from the point of view of nations, the Second World War sounds like a self-contained event, with a start and an end—but the Jews saw it as just another event in their continuum, not special, just another Jew promotion like fake news, faked 'Holocaust', faked money-making illnesses, faked money, other attacks against whites, attacks to control blacks...

Before and during WW2, some people were aware that Jewish power ruled the USA, Britain, and the USSR, behind the scenes. Could Hitler have made a fourth? Mussolini a fifth? And what about Jews in China, Turkey, France ...?

Here are a few Internet comments presenting this revisionist view of Hitler (my edits/spelling). Many are testable, at least in principle.

Oona Craig: The issue of whether Hitler was a genuine warrior against Jewish Tyranny is vitally important. If Hitler was genuine, we the goyim have hope that our European peoples can give rise to genuine leaders. If Hitler was a Jew who was used by the Rothschilds to lead Germany into ruin, we the goyim ... have a much harder battle to fight.
[Evidence that Hitler was a genuine opponent of Jews:] Jews always commemorate the deaths of their covert murders of opponents ... their "Hamans." [RW: But they also pre-advertise them] Von Stauffenberg wanted Hitler dead...and Alan Dulles seems to have been dancing a little Purim-type dance by relating the tale of von Stauffenberg's assassination attempt in his book, Germany's Underground, Allen Dulles, 1947, and the movie Valkyrie. It is significant that out of so many incidents in WW II, Dulles chose to dwell on von Stauffenberg. The plot goes directly to the issue of Hitler's true intentions for Germany. It would seem, therefore, that Hitler was a genuine opponent of Jews. (Other possible examples: Aviator celebrates their usurpation of the Howard Hughes empire; Apollo 13 their NASA Hoax. Oliver Stone's JFK - financed by Israeli Arnan Milchan - is a Purim-style gloating over the de-capitation of the "Haman" JFK.
[Evidence that Hitler was a Rothschild agent:] Hitler's staff was full of crypto Jews like Canaris and Richard Gehlen. It may have been that Hitler, despite his dealings with Jewish central bankers, had gone off-script and was pursuing his own aims. I don't know what to make of Rudolf Hess or Operation Paperclip....layers upon layers of deceit surround WW II. An argument for surmising that Hitler indeed was a Rothschild agent is Hitler's refusal to incorporate Vlasov's army of disillusioned Russian soldiers into the Wehrmacht despite the pleas of his generals. Hitler knew that Germany was "scripted" to lose. THAT is why Hitler refused to use the million-man Russian army that Vlasov offered to the Germans to help rid Russia of the Jewish Bolshevik parasites. That is why Hitler destroyed the German army by attacking Russia in the dead of winter. THAT is why Hitler let the British troops be evacuated from Dunkirk. THAT is why Rudolf Hess was held in prison until he died after flying to expose Hitler's perfidy to the Clivedon set whom Hess thought were allies. Hess was kept imprisoned his whole life for trying to expose the Rothschild-Churchill-Clivedon-Hitler Hoax. Rothschilds and their Judeomasonic flunkeys don't start wars until they control ALL sides. The Rothschilds made a secret pact with the Japanese Bankers/Royal Family prior to the war to eliminate the land-based Samurai class. Hiroshima/Nagasaki was "land clearance." Rothschild puppets Putin and Trump are conspiring for WW III.

Zekerias Varg: (Finnish?) Hitler and NSDAP were installed to get the war to put the nations in debt and to create a reason to create the structures for global government. Do you think that Wallenbergs did not know what the Warburgs and the other financiers of Hitler did? You have to get some knowledge about Kreuger, and to search and educate your self about the BIS bank, the ?france minister and so on. All government shills claim Hitler was the hero, but he was just a collectivist as all other pawns. Without Hitler no Israel. Just study the transfer agreement, the false flag crystal nacht. Study the Warburg Bank of Hamburg, in control the whole time. The MEFO bills, the Bank of England, IG Farben and the clearing agreements, the credits via Bank of England. It will be quite evident that the puppet regime of Germany from 33-45 was a bank operation in the agenda of the land of sand in 1948, to get the power structure for NWO that will be manifest under agenda 21...

Ger Tzedek: [I'm aware this is a Jewish expression] Something has changed. Too much information around. They no longer can do whatsoever they want. They wanted more wars for Israel, to defeat Syria, broken doors for invaders in Europe, Hillary, UK in EU, the vast riches of Russia. All that is not happening.
Germany mainly lost because Japan didn't attack the Soviet Union. The absolute majority of German casualties throughout the war happened in the eastern front. The only influence that West had in the war was by feeding Soviet Union whatsoever they wanted. West was humiliated too much by Germany alone. Coming from Eastern Europe, I was taught that 95% of the war was fought between Germany and Russia. Actually Soviets were right with this one.
Also, Hitler alienated the population in the occupied areas. I am not talking about the Poles, who were alienated no matter what. In Soviet Union the population initially welcomed Germans big time. That changed after Germans behaved cruelly with the local population. This is the number one mistake. [RW: This evades the false-uniform issue of Jewish 'partisans' - but:] They made other mistakes, plenty. Like letting go Brits in the Battle of France. Or stopping for 3 days in front of Moscow, giving Russians precious 3 days to recover. Or stupidly insisting in Stalingrad. If you look at the map of the southern extent of Germans, they were ever so close to the Caspian. Should they get there, they would have won the war by simply stopping the Soviet fuel, while getting so much fuel for themselves. At that point, no amount of Allied fuel would have saved Soviet Union.
Another big mistake that Germans did was with weapons. They insisted in new tanks that took forever to put to production and had no effect in the war, besides propaganda. They could have mass-produced one simpler tank model. Then there was this very efficient gun that Hitler stupidly stopped the production on a whim. He paid the price for that whim.

barkingdeer: [Once you see Jews took over Russia as the USSR, and when you realise that the Fed was established in 1913, just in time for WW1, and of course that the English Civil War (so called) established the Jewish Bank of England, you have most of the puzzle pieces. In addition, 'Saudi Arabia' seems to be a Jewish fief; and Castro in Cuba was a Marrano Jew. It’s possible Hitler was a plant, too, financed to keep out Germans (& Austrians, & Hungarians, & Poles) who wanted serious revenge for WW1. -RW]
You got all that right. Except, judging from his financial sources during his rise to power, his poor management conduct during WW2, the fact that his own generals tried to kill him at one point and the way it all turned out, with the destruction of the German army, the massacre of millions of German civilians, the ruin of its cities and infrastructure and the advancement of the Jewish state in Palestine it’s much harder to say Hitler was not a double agent all along. It isn’t as if we never see that sort of thing. Look at Obama and remember—the first rule of war is treachery.

[Start of article]