Note: Jesse Waugh pulled the NUKELIES forum in March 2012, without warning. His reasons for doing so are given here - rerev
Lucifer isn´t the sun. It´s the planet which is the carrier of the light, the harbinger of light, "lucis" means "of the lux", it´s what is seen before the rise of the sun in the morning.
kolkrabe19 2 days ago
@kolkrabe19 Thank you. Sounds beautiful.
jessewaugh 2 days ago
EXPOSED? LIES LIES LIES
watch?v=BnKlHgDBjUI
NASAHOAX 2 days ago
i just saw the tsar bomb documentary looks real. idk? what u think
Phx8ball602 3 weeks ago
@Abcormal hey like Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. Or the moon landing perchance and what about loose change. Or the cervical cancer jab or Portland Down.
naemasufi 1 month ago
@naemasufi You got info on the cervical cancer jab? They are doing a double up with genital warts vaccine. Also chinese? sceintists have joined bird and swine flu, and now have 197 different strains. Apparently. Reported today on AOL News for jabs, and The Star newspaper uk for flu.
TRIPCITY44 3 weeks ago
@TRIPCITY44 Contagion Theory is flawed. Viruses are quasi-organic and do not cause any disease. Microbes are opportunistic and multiply given appropriate environmental conditions. We cause disease by creating bodily imbalance, which avails microbes opportunity to multiply.
jessewaugh 3 weeks ago
@jessewaugh? Some viruses cause disease, but most do not, such as the harmless HIV. But the potential for scare mongering is very great with viruses, so there is a lot of fraud out there. This induces the public to cling to and put faith in a strong central gov't, to agree to restrict their liberties, and to fund the gov't.
mooninquirer 1 week ago
@mooninquirer HIV has never been isolated or identified. It is diagnosed by default. That is a good point that "viruses" are used as scare-mongering to create an artificial threat necessitating a protection racket.
jessewaugh 1 week ago
There are no more snippets of film available of war or peacetime bombings to yet be discovered - - like what later happened with the "moon landings", and which called into question their validity. If there were other more convincing footage in existence, it would have been dug up by the producers of "The Atomic Cafe", a full-length documentary on the bomb question.
NibiruLives 1 month ago
And the trees still have leaves on them !?! Oh and isn't that the same camera they brought to the moon?
~They have been lying to mankind forever.
deec269 1 month ago
Thanks for this vid. I've always thought the pictures of the house blowing up and the cars were not blown from an outside blast. Your film shows that it actually is from an interior explosion. Excellent summation about the sun too. Yes ~ Lucifarians.
Great Job!
deec269 1 month ago
@deec269 Thank you! I just realized after I read your comment that I've never been a very good slave. Perhaps being a good slave comes with benefits: welfare housing at least. But then they might blow it up from the inside and build a freedom tower
jessewaugh 1 month ago
Jesse, those trees on display at 1:57 show the after effects of a typhoon. I was in Japan in '94 and saw one come through. The pines looked like snapped twigs - just like they do in that still shot shown for a millisecond - and they were up to 2 feet in diameter! I'm sure you can find many more photos like it by doing a google image search. And the reason to lie to the public? It's scary: Wheezy, uh, secretary of state Rice said "we don't want the smoking gun to be a *mushroom cloud." WAR!
NibiruLives 2 months ago
@NibiruLives? And the trees still have leaves on them !?!
deec269 1 month ago
I just saw your film. Great analysis. We need more people as you to analyze stuff. If it weren't for Simon Shack, I never would have seen the 911 lies.
Thanks for opening our eyes.
074August 2 months ago
What actually happened at Chernoble?
ScalerWave 2 months ago
@ScalerWave Chernobyl is relatively unimportant in the nuke lies propaganda matrix. I don't know what happened but I would guess that it was a sizeable industrial power generation (or dumpload kettle) explosion. It is really only important in that it serves to reinforce the argument that nuclear bombs probably don't exist because it dispels the establishment radiation half-life paradigm, due to the radiation levels having since significantly abated according to establishment reports.
jessewaugh 2 months ago
@jessewaugh
I haven't done any research into the facts around it either but there is still the problem of what is powering nuclear subs and carriers. Even "17 November" the sub tech, agrees that uranium is being used although he doesn't agree with the classic explanation of the fission reaction. If what he is saying from first hand knowledge regarding nuke sub reactors and uranium fire? is true then it stands to reason that the kettling theory regarding land based reactors is not accurate.
ScalerWave 2 months ago
Comment removed
mooninquirer 1 week ago
@jessewaugh The radiation levels around ground zero at Prypiat have only subsided as result of a confinement envelope being constructed over the Chernobyl reactors, That work like a sarcophagus blocking most of the neutron radiation from escaping out.
Nukes exist, or are else you gonna have to believe the Japanese are in on this "grand conspiracy" and agreed to have themselves baked in xrays just to make it look like their thyroid cancers and radiation sickness came from a A-bomb.
Obasiliasfilosofos 1 month ago
@Obasiliasfilosofos The Japanese would have a far greater incentive to be in on this conspiracy than any other group in history. They needed the Americans very badly, as an ally against the very powerful Soviet Union and China, AND it allowed them to play the victim, and thus be exonerated for "Pearl Harbor " Bogus medical diagnoses are the easiest thing in the world to do; in fact, consensus medicine demands it, in order to pump up certain epidemiological stats ( HIV = AIDS FACT OR FRAUD ? )
mooninquirer 1 week ago
@jessewaugh thought you might find this interesting. it's about the Chernobyl accident and how the radiation fallout wasn't as bad as what was portrayed
google: Chernobyl hoax and it should be the first link
backwardworld 1 month ago
@jessewaugh? it's called: The Truth About Chernobyl Is Told
backwardworld 1 month ago
@backwardworld Very interesting - thank you! According to the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) states: "even among the progeny of the survivors of the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, who [supposedly] received radiation doses hundreds of times higher than the radiation doses to the inhabitants of regions contaminated by the Chernobyl accident, no radiogenetic disturbances of health have been found." - from 21stcenturysciencetech [dot] com
jessewaugh 1 month ago
@ScalerWave I believe nuclear reactors exist, and it is precisely for this reason that nuclear bombs do not Did Chernobyl explode NO ! In fact, it is always stated that it is IMPOSSIBLE for nuclear reactors to explode? ! The worst case scenario is a meltdown. So, the same thing is true for a nuclear "bomb." Subcritical masses brought together would only result in the critical mass getting very hot, melting, and melting the surrounding material.
mooninquirer 2 months ago
Many of the videos show a blast wave going in one direction and then immediately turning and going back in the other direction. This is evidence of a small explosion nearby which blasted air out and created a vacuum which sucked the air back a few seconds later. It clearly shows that the explosions (which are not even shown) were small scale.
GermanenGerd 2 months ago
@GermanenGerd Interesting - I've not heard this before. Please clarify further. Thank you.
jessewaugh 2 months ago
@GermanenGerd
Yeah that is a good point. I also noticed that the timing for the directional change of the wind was rather fast for such a supposedly "large scale" explosion. I would definitely agree that the houses and other structures appear to be models, indicating that the footage is faked.
ScalerWave 2 months ago
@GermanenGerd Yes, and the models of the houses look very small scale, too. Maybe they were only 1 foot high. And those trees, for this photo, were artificial trees probably just a foot high. Now, the trees being very straight is the one thing that they are admitting is fake. It wasn't a natural forest or even a grove. They claim they cut down trees and cemented them into the ground for this test. Will they also admit that "Ivy Mike" is fake as well ? That is the most obvious one.
mooninquirer 2 months ago
I never gave it much thought but you do present an interesting position. I'm not convinced that they don't exist but this video does raise the doubt
ScalerWave 2 months ago
@ScalerWave Thank you.
jessewaugh 2 months ago
@jessewaugh
One question going thru my mind is "what is going on in nuclear reactors?". Are you also saying that the atom has not been split?
ScalerWave 2 months ago
@ScalerWave Rerevisionist has set up an email forum inspired by NUKE LIES, of which I am a part. It has been postulated by members of the forum that "nuclear reactors" are merely dumpload "kettles" used to boil off excess electricity produced by utility companies seeking to create artificial scarcity.
jessewaugh 2 months ago
Ok, now that's just messed up. At first I thought you were crazy, now I think I am. t. My dad was there shortly after the bombs were dropped and while he didn't go into detail, it must have been horrible. Such is war. If something is fairly short I usually hear it out. Carpet bombs could have done that if enough were dropped. It would still have Japan shocked. Damage would be the same. I don't always want to believe what I see, but I go with the evidence. This poses new questions. Thanks.
hilly777 2 months ago
@hilly777 We can think critically. It is still legal to do so, although they will soon legislate otherwise.?
jessewaugh 2 months ago
@jessewaugh , critically thinking is not allowed.
This has really given me a reason to muse this over, and after musing I think you are right. The hardest thing to do is to get people to understand when they've been fooled. The longer the duration, or the bigger the lie, the harder that it is for them to believe it. I always wondered why dad and his outfit went in there for medical care right after that and none of them were effected by radiation. It just don't add up.hilly777 2 months ago
@hilly777 You're right. I was just in the Natural History Museum and they had a picture of an "astronaut" on the "moon." Even though I'm fully aware that the moon landing was a hoax, I looked at the picture hopefully, hoping that I'd see evidence that it could have been real. Then I quickly noticed that the astronaut's shadow and the shadow of a tripod were not parallel, despite their being about six feet away from each other. People tend to be too fearful or pig-headed to admit to being duped.
jessewaugh 2 months ago
Jesse, I regret to tell you that A LOT of people are saying on other sites that this video was just a parody. However, from what you are saying, as well as your tone of voice, it is very clear to me, upon a first hearing, that you are 100 % sincere about this issue. However, as I am very familiar with the ASCH CONFORMITY EXPERIMENT, I am aware that the power of suggestion is more dangerous than these bombs. So, keep this comment high, so I can witness your sincerity.
mooninquirer 2 months ago
@mooninquirer I sincerely believe that nuclear bombs do not exist. Trolls and naysayers will attempt to deride my message of truth, but this cannot take away from its timeliness. The old world order must and will fail. We are the new owners of the power within humanity to progress away from cowardly and ignorant and morbidly dependent sloth towards a cleaner, brighter, and more enlightened future.
jessewaugh 2 months ago
I don't really understand how you can just brush aside all of the primary source information out there. What about the victims of Hiroshima who gave first-hand accounts of the single plane that passed over, the lack of air-raid sirens, the mysterious "Disease X," not to mention the POW's from MULTIPLE countries who saw the bombing of Nagasaki happen from the trenches they dug?
viziermoo 3 months ago
@viziermoo Primary source? The entire 20th Century was a hoax. Central banks, modern art, multiculturalism, free enterprise, NASA, The Depression, World Wars I and II, the "medical" industry, pop culture, were all an unfathomably immense con. Go ahead and believe your "primary source" - it hasn't done me any good except as a foil.
You want a primary source? Contact Evelyn Rothschild. He may be able to put you in touch with his superior.
jessewaugh 3 months ago
@jessewaugh Well said brother.?
friedchickenlittle 2 months ago
@jessewaugh All of the things you mentioned DO have lies or at least half-truths in them. These lies are a cancer that has destroyed our brains ---- both what we think we know, and our emotions. But we should be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater, and say everything is a lie. But we should not take for granted as true, anything just because the media or even books say it is true. We need to question everything, and check all references and resources.
mooninquirer 2 months ago
@viziermoo Please help me out ---- because I want to research this. Tell me where I can read about what you are claiming, other than in John Hersey's "Hiroshima." The very purple prose in that book leads me to question his account. The Japanese would have an ENORMOUS psychological need to agree with this ---- they needed America as an ally, vs. the very powerful Soviet Union, and China --- plus their BUSHIDO would be protected, as there was no dishonor in not fighting " a most cruel bomb."
mooninquirer 2 months ago
I know nuclear bombs do exist, because Fox and MSNBC said so.
mrbluesfan22 3 months ago
@mrbluesfan22 Touché.
jessewaugh 3 months ago
@mrbluesfan22 I know nuclear bombs exist for 2 reasons:
1. I saw 2 Nevada blasts with my own eyes.
2. I was a crewman on a nuclear site in 59/60.
One more thing...The light is so powerful that it does tend to make things look like models. One of the times i saw it i was driving across the mojave heading for Nevada (where i was born) and i saw the Sierra Nevada light up and look like a model railroad setup.
PS - I don't doubt that some of the footage is fake...
javamanV3 2 months ago
@javamanV3 I quote you "I don't doubt that some of the footage is fake." That is the jist of this video so we agree.You wrote:"I saw 2 Nevada blasts with my own eyes." Yes, but what was blasting?
jessewaugh 2 months ago
@jessewaugh You have me there - I couldn't be absolutely sure it was an atomic bomb - Just as you can't be absolutely sure that it wasn't, but the point is mute. In both cases i had physical comparisons to be made in size and distance and in one case there were broken windows in a town i drove through later that was roughly 100Mi from the blast. Also as a kid in northern Nevada, we used to see the clouds come over after a blast was reported in the paper. Something BIG was happening.
javamanV3 2 months ago
@javamanV3 and how old are you supposed to be now and what did you see? was in nuclear? or was it many bomb devices? or could it have been another form of device? how do you know for certain what it was?
princefy 1 day ago
Jessewaugh
Thank you for this video. You have found out one the biggest scams since the holohaox and 911.
They cannot and have not "split the Atom". There are no "Nuclear bombs".
To the believers show us one example of a modern Atomic / Nuclear explosion that is not from a Hollywood movie. Every war since WW2 is always a long protracted war were soldiers dying and the US or USSR debt increases; yet one bomb would get an instant surrender.(Afghanistan, Iraq, Korea, Vietnam...) lies
5 stars!
Rcoxx4u 4 months ago
Thanks for uploading ! Certainly this is among the most informative and compelling videos I've seen. I am 100 % certain that this footage is faked. Yes, that is some liquid in a laboratory, overlaid on the sun, for the supposed H-bomb test. Not only is it fake, it is a very cheesy production, and it is amazing people believed it at all. We are much more sophisticated today compared to back then, and not just in technology ---- we are rightfully less trusting of the government.
mooninquirer 4 months ago
@mooninquirer Thanks - I agree the liquid composite is one of the most obvious fakeries, and I appreciate your acknowledging that. I'm getting kind of tired of so much gullibility. But most of the negative comments I get are obviously from provocateurs.
jessewaugh 4 months ago
Thank you for creating this bold and informative video series
telesniper2 4 months ago
@telesniper2 Thank you?
jessewaugh 4 months ago
@telesniper2 Thank you
jessewaugh 3 months ago
jessewaugh, do you believe that 9/11 was an inside job?
chanel6548 5 months ago
@chanel6548 yes
jessewaugh 5 months ago
@jessewaugh? ever thought about making a 9/11 was an inside job video?
chanel6548 5 months ago
@chanel6548 No - I've known from the day that it was demolished using explosives. I ran from the corner of West St. and Vesey when the south tower fell. I got interviewed by a camera guy and told him there's no way those came down on their own, and the powers that be were responsible.
Not to be overly cynical but anyone who still needs convincing isn't worth the effort.
jessewaugh 5 months ago
@jessewaugh There are also many others to do videos on the fact that 911 was an inside job. Say, did you see molten metal at ground zero I wish I could say I believed 100 % it was a hoax from day one, but because of a phenomenon explained in this youtube video : ASCH CONFORMITY EXPERIMENT, I and many others accepted the official story. But the boxcutter story always seemed very implausible to me, and cell phones can make calls from INSIDE planes ?
mooninquirer 4 months ago
@mooninquirer Why does the boxcutter story seem implausible? Do you know what a boxcutter is? Have you ever seen one? They're knives. Think about it- professional terrorists who prepared long before hijacking planes vs. civilian pilots. Isn't it obvious? And did you not know phones can make calls from inside planes? Well, they can indeed.
pineapplebaron 4 months ago
@pineapplebaron Because the passengers would have just walloped them with their carry-on luggage. Cell phones are better now, with more antennae, but at the time and several years afterward, cell phone calls would just be dropped whenever one went inside a building, or in a car passing. The content of the cell phone calls is highly suspicious --- some say they THINK they were hijacked. Especially if it WERE with boxcutters, the stewardesses would give out a bloodcurdling scream.
mooninquirer 2 months ago
@mooninquirer not even a single cellphone in 2002 . this whole thing was to justify the war and to make everyone afraid of muslims so they can go there and take the oil and spread christianity by force . george war bush didn't even bother to leave the school when they secret service informed him about the attack . and the ( fake ) person who made the call from the plane , he mentioned his full name when he spoke to his mother , since when ppl say their full names when they call their own parents
adibeh 3 months ago
i hope there fake cuz i worry of nuclear war everyday?
catshumpcats3 6 months ago
Great job! Very intersting.
AntimatterRadio 6 months ago
@AntimatterRadio Thank you!
jessewaugh 4 months ago
Amazing special effects can be accomplished without computers. A recent motion picture "The Fountain" used such techniques:
watch?v=bx7TroR06-Q
chriskendall1 6 months ago
How long will it take before these idiotic Hollywood hoaxes will be uncovered to the masses?
DoomNoMore 7 months ago
@DoomNoMore The "Moon Landing" has been shown to be a complete fabrication, yet it would seem a majority of people still choose to believe in it.
It's just like 9/11 - people do not want to believe that they have to work for themselves. They'd rather remain sucking on the tit of the nanny state. The masses and the totalitarianists are equally parasitical.
jessewaugh 7 months ago
@jessewaugh A lot of hoaxes exist. Theres quite some interesting ones on the internet. I found a lot of them when looking for them.
DoomNoMore 6 months ago
@jessewaugh it's not unusual that most people choose their beliefs, society nurtures the idea of faith over reason via it's use of religions, superstitions and ritualistic practices.
We're wired to believe what makes sense to us and if reality doesn't make sense to us then we find something that does. It's human nature to accept things as they appear to be but it's also human nature to pacify fear with escapism/ the greater the overabundance of fear in the world the wider that curve becomes.
arlobrubaker 4 months ago
and even if they are real,one nuclear bomb only one strike can cause others as well to be launched which results end of the world... I say America and world stop using our money for war and war equipment (50% of total funds over the world goes to weapons)?
Alexbl100 7 months ago
relating the past comment a Serbian scientist also known as Nikola Tesla personally said to Albert that he is a fool experimenting on atoms... Albert failed and created something else... Alternative source of energy that was very deadly and toxic using the radioactive material and creating more of that... For some reason world awarded Albert... maybe the future most mass murderer...
Alexbl100 7 months ago
Another thing, as far as I know the only thing that can be made from collision or separation or whatever Albert did u can create a black hole... Atomic bomb is considered to be something like that am I right atoms under a large pressure explode and inflict chaos... blah those are the lies... now day atomic bombs are just a fail on what Albert worked on... NATO and other world powers only posses the power of altering human to worse, degrading our DNA and making civilizations slowly fade away...
Alexbl100 7 months ago
look nuclear bombs aren't powerful to reduce whole cities to ashes, on the contrary it acts like a regular ballistic missile just with a lot radioactive material which can pollute everything in enormous area for a millions of years... look at the Chernobyl, where everyone got sick after the accident, every house is at its place but there is no people... Atomic bomb=chemical and toxic disaster
Alexbl100 7 months ago
If they do exist wouldn't the entire planet be contamainated with nuclear fallout?After-all ,how many supposed nuclear devices have they supposedly detonated in their alleged experiments...Thousands???Than where is the fallout and why has life in Nagasaki and Hiroshima completely returned to normal?Interesting video.
friedchickenlittle 7 months ago
@friedchickenlittle Quite right - it's becoming increasingly obvious that nuclear bombs are very unreal.
jessewaugh 7 months ago
@jessewaugh well, nuclear powerplants are a reality today, and its easier to create an uncontrolled release of energy than one thats regulated. therefore, nuclear bombs exist.
Krogoth04 5 months ago
@Krogoth04 That is an invalid syllogism.
jessewaugh 5 months ago
@Krogoth04 No, because the explanation of nuclear weapons require a conventional explosive to compress the fissile material into a "supercritical" state. This requires the pressure from the detonator to overcome all pressure from the fission of all the material. If it can't contain it, then at some point when only a small material has reacted, it would scatter the rest of the material. Therefore it is impossible to create an explosion much greater than the detonator itself.
telesniper2 4 months ago
@telesniper2 Very good explanation. The requirement for supercriticality applies to the Plutonium bombs. I would also add, that no chemical explosion is going to compress any metal. Gas, sure. But not metal. It might BEND the metal outwards, and break it, but it would never reduce it in volume. Think about a cannon with an enormous plug at one end.
mooninquirer 2 months ago
@Krogoth04 I do not accept this argument. I believe nuclear power plants exists, but what is the maximum release of energy in a supposed nuclear critical mass of uranium could be just it getting extremely hot, and giving off radiation. I see no reason for for it to explode. I see that for black powder, because the nitrate releasing oxygen, combining with sulfur and carbon to produce gases sulfur and carbon dioxide, which expand.
mooninquirer 4 months ago
@friedchickenlittle you have to understand that over time, radioactive particles would diffuse as evenly over an area as much possible, like when you add a drop of food dye to a glass of water. in this case, setting off an a bomb is like dropping a drop of food dye into a swimming pool; it will eventually diffuse into the atmosphere and it would be hard to pick up due to background radiation from other sources such as the sun.
Krogoth04 5 months ago
great video. the narrator sounds like Jay, from Jay and Silent Bob. Good stuff.?
citizncain 7 months ago
The passive radiation in the air worldwide spiked in the 1940s after nuclear bombs started being tested.
You can tell this by running an extremely sensitive geiger counter over any vegetable matter harvested before the 40s - furniture, canned food, paints, whatever - and comparing to anything harvested after.
MooffinMan 8 months ago
@MooffinMan - Do you possess an extremely sensitive geiger counter? ? I ask partly because my detailed metrology text book has no info whatever on detecting any tpye of radiation popularly linked to nuclear weapons
rerevisionist 7 months ago
Part 2.
So, the deal was struck. By collaborating with the USA/Zionist Regime, the Japanese had to make a sacrifice to prove their pledge of allegence. Its not like the leaders were to be killed, rather the people. All you need is plenty of TNT and an industrial nation can make millions of tons whenever it needs to, real quick.
Any Country that the AllEYEZ (allies) claim to have "Nuclear Weapons" are actually allied with the AllEYEZ even if made to appear an enemy. This way, it seems real.
masons20 8 months ago
Great Video,
I honestly always new that they didn't exist anyways. Your very articulate.
Before "nuking" nagasaki and hiroshima, Japan had surrended 7 days earlier. But the transmission was delayed because of no modern technology to reach the "AllEyes (allies).
The above is what we are led to believe.
Japans Shadow Government was always a sellout anyways, working for another order with other interests. Remember the movie "The Last Samuri"? The Japs sold out ages ago.
masons20 8 months ago
@masons20? That's an important point: The Japanese Government is no less compromised than any other first world government.
jessewaugh 8 months ago
@masons20
Very true. I am coming to this conclusion too. Japans Government was very probably a part of the conspiracy. I have heard that, during some times, a blackout was put on informations coming from Japanese people about the so called nuclear bombing. Why doing that, if the bombing was really a nuclear one ?
voerioc 7 months ago
@voerioc The Japanese government of WW2 was in the control of xenophobic militarist who took power from the emperor(a lover a western culture). He made a plea to his royal friends in England who sent America to take care of his enemies who were all killed on the islands of the Pacific and executed after the war. The allies never planned on invading Japan at all, only to put their man back in power!
sslim29205 7 months ago
Im not some redneck who loves nukes and guns etc, i actually hate guns and wish nukes and guns didnt exist. But your video shows very very little proof of anything. All that you've shown is "what does this look like? idk, could be something else", which simply doesnt hold any water. You also point out your lack of knowledge on multiple points by saying such things. I agree, out government is fucked, and in the beginning you showed 9/11. I agree, 9/11 they definately lied about but to what extent
hockeygod9911 8 months ago
@hockeygod9911 - the video hints at faked film of nuclear tests. I was intrigued and thought I'd check it. I bought (and found) DVDs including material from the 1940s and 1950s, and later, purportedly showing nuclear tests. On examination (preferably with film editing software, to allow slow motion and freeze frames) it was clear Jess was right - the film was faked. There's at least one group investigating.
rerevisionist 8 months ago
Nukes due exist however they can only be? detonated by a specific location where the sun is and can only because of that be detonated twice a year. Type in Nuke Hoax.
magnum4magnets82 9 months ago
@magnum4magnets82 The Barry Smith "nuke hoax" is spin. Nuclear bombs do not exist. They do not need to "be in a certain position relative to the sun," as he puts it.
Nuclear bomb footage is often manipulated imagery of the sun.
jessewaugh 8 months ago
@jessewaugh
Well the chemical reaction the nuclear equasion exists some conventional bombs look like that, just because somethings so bright and powerful and looks like the sun means it's fake.
magnum4magnets82 8 months ago
Search? youtube for 'Chinese space walk fake'. I hadn't thought of underwater shoots to simulate weightlessness!
rerevisionist 9 months ago
@rerevisionist Lol - I? hadn't thought of that either. What terrible footage! I guess they couldn't afford Kubrick.
jessewaugh 9 months ago
Great vid.? Super interesting. I have been thinking of these scenarios for some time now and have many doubts myself.
The major logical tipping point of doubt for me, is, if there really are Nuclear weapons and they are owned by the people who purportedly own them now, we would have been wiped out long ago by malpractice.
It's something not really visible, but practical considering how they operate to this day.
That atom bomb blast looks like a Lava lamp projection at a be-in! haha
freqazoidiac 9 months ago
@freqazoidiac That is definitely the crux of the issue - if they had it they would have used it by now, on more than just? Hiroshima/Nagasaki.
jessewaugh 9 months ago
@freqazoidiac - lol @? lava lamp. Pity it was too early for Pink Floyd to do the effects
rerevisionist 9 months ago
And just for the record, I never stated anything on my? personal opinion one way or the other because that isn't what I came here to discuss. It isn't relevant to what I'm trying to say. If you can't make sense of what I am saying I would suggest you re-read it a few times until it sinks in a bit. Entertain the thought. You can do it.
Artuir82 9 months ago
what? about tsar?
ALgeriee2010 10 months ago
@ALgeriee2010 You tell? me.
jessewaugh 10 months ago
This viewpoint on issues is tired and old. It boils down to, "I didn't see it with my own eyes and I suspect the videos were faked". It is good to question information but there is a level you hit where it makes the entire concept of knowledge useless because everything is technically unprovable? if you really want to warp it using whatever methods at your disposal.
Artuir82 10 months ago
@Artuir82 Your viewpoint is unscientific. Questions are the foundation of science, and can never be tired? or old. Keep questioning lest ye become ignorant. Do nuclear bombs exist?
jessewaugh 10 months ago
@Artuir82 soooooooooo um , then why do you? believe its true then? if nothings technically provable. that whole statement was a contradiction. the good thing about you tube is now you have all the time in the world to come up with a response. no hate, and im by no means an expert on the subject. with more research ill form an opinion, but to tell you the truth, im forming one real quick so far. sorry, but that just made no sense man.
KnyphsEdge 9 months ago
@KnyphsEdge You're right on - Artuir82 is a typical militroll failing to conjure? pseudo-logic.
jessewaugh 9 months ago
Very Interesting, I never really questioned this before. It's very possible that it's? just another mechanism to keep people in fear, aka controlled.
boozigs 10 months ago
@boozigs That's what I think too. War seems to? be something other than the just a battlefield. War is actually the mentally dominant against the ignorant.
jessewaugh 10 months ago
@jessewaugh your view about the carpet bombing is very probable. If you even look at the pictures of? the 1921 riots at Tulsa Oklahoma, you see similar destruction, and that was mostly just fire damage!
freqazoidiac 9 months ago
just look up other nuke videos. the? videos stay focused on the mushroom clouds all the way through.
colek711 10 months ago
because a newer weapon, the hydrogen bomb was invented, which uses hughly unstable hydrogen isotopes. I'm really sure, that the people who survived the bombings would beg to differ. The world would not have been thrown into a nuclear arms race because of a fake bomb. the Russians knew it was real, so they began building one. Look at the cuban missile crisis.? we would not have cut off all trade with Cuba over fake missiles. And the situation over in pakistan would not be so heated over fakes
colek711 10 months ago
@colek711 - just a point of information: isotopes of hydrogen are not unstable. They just aren't common. Deuterium is made by electrolysis of water, in which electric current splits it into hydrogen and oxygen. Deuterium is heavier than ordinary hydrogen, and is slower to move to the electrode; so all you have to do is wait until the water remining has a certain high measured density, and you know you have a lot of deuterium oxide. I presume the same must be true of tritium, which is? rarer.
rerevisionist 2 months ago
The Japanese wouldn't of surrendered over a carpet bomb, there had to have been something massive, with true destructive power to make a nation whose ideology of war is to never surrender, surrender. I agree the bomb tapes? do look a little fishy but i think its just cropped together videos of multiple bombs. Because if you watch the houses, there is no bomb that can create a massive overpressure like that to pull a house over, except for a nuclear weapon. They stopped calling them Nukes...
colek711 10 months ago
How do you? explain nuclear reactors if you think nuclear bombs aren't real?
johnygfunk 11 months ago
@johnygfunk That burden of proof would be on? you.
jessewaugh 11 months ago
@johnygfunk What does the existence? of nuclear reactors have ANY thing to do with supposed existence of atomic bombs?
Italianlad69 10 months ago
@Italianlad69 Good point.?
jessewaugh 10 months ago
@Italianlad69 because they operate under the same scientific principals. if nuclear bombs don't? exist than the entirety of atomic theory is inexplicable, not to mention all basic chemistry. your conspiracy theory answers nothing and only feeds your own paranoia.
maxk322 10 months ago
@maxk322 - this isn't quite right. The facts about the nucleus, neurtons and protons and electrons, atomic weights, and isotopes may be considered? established. BUT some of the material - for example transuranic elements, the quantities of energy involved, the changes of state involved, and the masses of particles is much more questionable. It's possible that even if enormous heat was given out, the thing might not explode, but just get hot, for exmaple. The sun doesn't explode.
rerevisionist 8 months ago
@rerevisionist i think the gravity of? the sun from its sheer mass would contain the explosions quite well. not to mention hints of explosions on the surface i.e solar flares.
Krogoth04 5 months ago
(continuation of response)....."....all that can be seen is the light the outer shell gives off. A millisecond or so after the detonation, the inner shell expands far enough that it blows through the outer shell and the glowing surface of the? now exposed inner fireball can be seen, hence the second flash."
fusorman 11 months ago
i agree about the lies of the moon landing or 9/11, in my opinion the? moon landing is COMPLETELY fake, where as the twin towers have been destroyed using explosives, and i rly do not believe that it was a terrorist attack.
WTFisMYname24 1 year ago
well what if the? camera had some type of heavy equipment to keep it in place to actually GET the clip of the damage. instead of wasting their time with no evidance. and yea the hydrogen molecules are compressed to unbelivable degrees in the clip of the very first H bomb, therefore at one point where they do reach maximum capacity, there ofc will be a flash of light and something that looks like a change in state as they create Huge amounts of friction inbetween each other.....
WTFisMYname24 1 year ago
Have you heard of the Harmonic Code?
It seems more likely that these videos were faked by the government because to make them would be near impossible but I think, like in 9/11, you might be going to far to say that? the events never took place (Hiroshima and Nagasaki).
The Videos of 9/11 were faked as well but could I go the same path and say the Twin Towers are still there?
TGBigChilly4 1 year ago
The question is *what* took place at Hiroshima. WTC towers were demolished with explosives.?
jessewaugh 1 year ago
This matches the lies of 9/11.
It is ironic how arcutue this quote is:
" If we do not learn from history we are doomed to repeat it."
Whither it be The "Nuke", Moon Hoax or 9/11 they have been? lieing to us through T.V. for years.
TGBigChilly4 1 year ago
Mythbusters demonstrated the kind of damage radiation does to even modern cameras, some of the same effects can be seen between? 0:45-0.47
tacoparody 1 year ago
That's? called dust.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
Interesting perspective. I can only imagine that when they discovered nuclear fusion, (free energy) it scared the shit out of the PTB and special interest groups. Hense the fear mongering of anything nuclear was to be feared. It leaked out that Iran is working on nuclear fusion at is fordo facility. I cant find that info anymore. There was a treaty to keep free energy from? the public. If Iran releases this, the treaty will be broken. China, India and Russia LOVE Iran. They want this techno NOW!
sallyos06460 1 year ago
A thought provoking video. Government brainwashing of people through the media has always occurred and the ultimate aim is control. So many government claims are now proven to be untrue, that I do believe footage in the video must have been created to try and influence people and gain control. (I am not debating the? actual bombing of Hiroshima, I just think that Jesses point about the type of bomb claimed to have been used is highly suspect)
condysending 1 year ago
Another mistake? in H Bombs is the 'double flash'.
Theory: A-bomb goes off.. this fuses tritium, or whatever. So - a double flash!
BUT
[1] If the first flash is visible, the casing must be breached - the stuff has got out - including the tritium etc. If the thing's blown to pieces, how can the surrounding secondary stuff be activated?
[2] Timing issue. Two frames of a film are 1/12 sec apart at 24 frames/sec a huge delay for such a reaction!
Faked, like the initial reversed dark frame!
rerevisionist 1 year ago
That may be the most damning analysis yet.
It amazes me that virtually everyone in the world believes that "split" atoms? explode into gigantic mushroom clouds.
And they call us the crazies!
jessewaugh 1 year ago
@jessewaugh Not sure if you two are trying to be sarcastic or not, but rerevisionist, that's not what causes the double flash phenomenon at all........what an observation, the case must be breached for the first flash to be seen. Yes, the reaction is longer over? before the sequence of flashes is seen. First flash happens from the initial x-rays and ultraviolet radiation which outpaces the material shock wave. After several milliseconds, the material catches up, and as it is
fusorman 11 months ago
no, i don't beleive that it fuses " tritium, or whatever". Here's how it actually works: "Early in the detonation the explosion consists of two concentric spheres. The outer one is created by a sudden flood of radiation being absorbed by the surrounding air? and heating it to incandescence. The inner one is the fireball of the vaporized solid elements of the bomb itself. The ionized structure of the outer shell makes it opaque to light from the inner shell so ......."
fusorman 11 months ago
I just noticed another anomaly. In the supposed British H bomb test, dropped from the air, there's a reflection in water - I'd say in fact the sun. But despite the huge blast, the surface reflects the same way -? i.e. a few ripples. There's no pressure wav, tsunami type effect, or anything!
rerevisionist 1 year ago
I just reviewed your British H Bomb video - you're right on about the reflection anomaly. But what? stands out even more is the obvious foley work on the explosion.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
Ahhhh... thanks. I have a 1960 'Focal Encyclopedia of Photography' (a school prize!) and I'm checking out foley effects, matte boxes etc.
The same visual effect appears in 'Operation Castle' and that ornage one (I forget the title). NB you must have noticed Chinese and Russian films? use the same methods, too.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
... you are correct that all this footage has been edited & produced ; however your critical analysis be not focused in a manner that this viewer is inclined to accept as anything more than belief, such as was employed in the films of concerned. These propaganda films of disinformation were not designed to share actual "secret data" but as instruments of subjugation, and I applaud you for attacking? such lies, as the truth should never be hidden. There are powers much greater than human nukes !
docatomics 1 year ago
How do you explain the witnesses of Hiroshima and? Nagasaki?
suedefalcon 1 year ago
What witnesses??
jessewaugh 1 year ago
The ones who weren't killed outright by the blasts? Sure, some died of radiation, but there were survivors. Or is the entire country? of Japan in on the Illuminati conspiracy, too?
hellburger99 1 year ago
The entire country of Japan does not necessarily know what's? actually going on any more than you apparently do.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
Yup, you're clearly correct. Clearly nukes don't exist and the Japanese are lying as part of their terms of surrender from WWII. That's why they honor the day the bombs were dropped with annual debates on whether not the Americans were justified in using nuclear weapons to end the war. It's all a big lie they help propagate to fool us American sheep!?
hellburger99 1 year ago
Why do you so vehemently desire the existence of nuclear? bombs?
Check out the video response.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
The following youtube gives documentary evidence on the truth of Hiroshima and Nagasaki - at least, the politics.
watch?v=Cfunvkn4jBM
Irving believes (as of course most people still do) in the? actual weapons.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
note: oppenheimer misquotes the Bhagavad Gita. It's more correct as 'kalah--time; asmi-I am'
Krishna didn't claim to 'become death' as He is clear ch. 9:19 ' I am also death personified. Both being and nonbeing are? in Me.'
jfiddude 1 year ago
Yes - I'd looked into this and concur. However, the underlying rationale of his quoting the Bhagavad Gita is this: The Gita advocates just warfare against one's inferiors. Oppenheimer considers the masses to be? his inferiors.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
The threat of atomic bombs responds to? a primeval, r-complex fear of volcanic eruptions, fire, and a feeling of inferiority to the sun. "We are scared of the big fire god, we'd best go hide." etc. Speaking from the experience of someone who was scared shitless by "informative" lessons on how many bombs there are, how someone may one day drop one, how AWFUL the world would be afterwards, it is clear that SOME people at least wanted the idea of The Bomb to create a stalemate.
AtticusStount 1 year ago
@AtticusStount Superb comment. More than just a stalemate - an artificial dialectic.?
jessewaugh 1 year ago
I just have to say PFFT! To this video. I live in Norway. And here in 1986 we had nuclear-debree that fell from Tsjernobyl. many parents who were pregnant at the? time wanted their babies tested for damages caused by the debree. I have a friend who has severe paralasis in the face 'cause of it. AND! My grandfather was a young lad in the 50's and 60's working with fishing. at the time one of the blasts was made. The has told me he could see trough his hand like an x-ray, how do you explain that?
Esiris1 1 year ago
hearsay |'hi(?)r?sa|
noun
• Information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.
• Law: The report of another person's words by a witness,? usually disallowed as evidence in a court of law.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
@Esiris1 - if there was radiation damage on a large scale - why was there no damage to animals? Or birds? Or plants? Why are there no deformed cats and dogs,? cattle, seabirds, birds, plants, trees?
rerevisionist 1 year ago
Thank you for posting this. I agree? that "the bomb" is a hoax. Most od these scams are Media propagated. If you have not heard about it watch September Clues(9/11 Hoax)
They cannot split the Atom.
They cannot go to the Moon and return.
foxxx2001 1 year ago
there are some clever cuts on your part there,but every one of those bombs behaved exactly as it should have. the? H bomb darkened the camera,because it actually overloaded camera,anything that bright,will make everything look black around it in the picture. if nothing else,i think the most telling evidence,is that the japanese people,who were willing to commit suicide as a team,gave up a couple of days after the first bomb. bushido culture ftw
ViralMessiah 1 year ago
@ViralMessiah - could you look at my videos too, please - Jesse suggested this hypothesis to me, which I hadn't met before, and it doesn't take much searching to find confirmation.
It's possible nuclear weapons? were made to work later. But all the early ones - up to the 1960s - including Chinese H bombs - have definite evidence of fakery.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
... there was? & is, seek & ye shall find, developing critical thinking all along the way; is exactly what I have done. Know the difference between belief & truth, as if making a science experiment, might help you along the road. Then you can share" how you learned to think" with others of similar mind, struggling to overcome the pattern of "programed learning" that has inhibited so very many as the plague that against prevented sentience for many a species now extinct .
docatomics 1 year ago
Well, I would have voted 5 stars if the rating were? not disabled. LOL
queerbuzz 1 year ago
Interesting video. Thank you for posting.
I? rated 5 stars.
queerbuzz 1 year ago
Wonder how many said ''Is the cake a lie?'', Or ''The cake is? a lie!.''
Gabronthe 1 year ago
I assume you are referring to the famous quote: "Quils mangent de? la brioche," mistakenly attributed to Marie Antoinette. If so, then your correlation is appreciated.
Nuclear bombs are a lie.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
He's referring to a computer game so called Portal where the game tells you there will be? cake in the end of the game but, there isn't. "The cake is a lie"
NonaL33T 1 year ago
@jessewaugh
play a computer game once in a while, the "cake" in Portal has NOTHING to do with that infamous? non-quote.
Mind you, if you played Portal and found it too difficult you'd probably say that the game is a lie or some other bullshit excuse for quitting.
Treblaine 1 year ago
It's amazing how many negative comments come from people with video excerpts of computer games placed all over their youtube pages. So gaming makes you an expert on atomic bombs?
"play a computer game once? in a while" - What -- so I can become convinced that what I see on the screen is real?
jessewaugh 1 year ago
I can't believe there are this many morons in the world. You suggest the US can fake nuclear blasts and convince the entire world it happened without anyone being able to prove otherwise, but you can't believe they had a camera lens capable of filming from a safe distance. Classic. Just don't go and tell the people in Nagasaki and Hiroshima about the fake blasts,? they are really committed to the lie in Japan. Considering all of the time and energy they spent faking radiation poisoning.
MrRuger539 1 year ago
You have a vested interest in the belief in nuclear bombs. This is due to one of two things: you are an agent of some kind; or you? are craven and gullible.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
I agree, the cold war was a hoax (which i fell for at the time, being very young) both to maintain the dialectic of east vs west and to psycologically? keep the ppl in a state of fear, making said ppl much easier to control.
But carpet bombing e.t.c. doesn't cause subsequent deaths, cancer and birth defects attributed only to actual nuclear radiation poisoning.
zealotnut 1 year ago
Where are these? "subsequent deaths, cancer and birth defects" - Chernobyl? Hiroshima? Arizona? Bikini Atoll? If so, show me proof - because I've seen none.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
ur scared of these weapons like everybody else. i know alot bout these weapons and the physics behind them. u mentioned that they were taping the sun? when u fuse atoms together thats the same thing that happens in the sun. nuclear fusion. what about Chernobyl? Google Earth shows underground low yield craters. or the entire cold war? I think if Hiroshima was a? lie then they would say by now without the treat of attack. the world leaders wouldnt allow it. but ur obviously not convinced yet r u?
onlyhuman2121 1 year ago
if this is true , it would explain a lot .
Like ,why was Hiroshima re inhabited immediately ? Chernobyl is abandoned to? this day .
1ebihal 1 year ago
The strong correlation with the scale of Anomia indicates that Belief in Conspiracies is associated with the feelings of alienation? and disaffection from the system. Volkan (1985) suggests that during periods of insecurity and discontent people often feel a need for a tangible enemy on which to externalize their angry feelings. Conspiracy theories may help in this process by providing a tangible enemy to blame for problems which otherwise seem too abstract and impersonal.
Track14 1 year ago
Your argument disproves itself. Russia was the tangible enemy, and was controlled opposition; much as 9/11 was false flag terror. The atomic bomb myth was the glue that? held the cold war together.
jessewaugh 1 year ago
I like your subject matter i believe that ofcourse propganda was used with some of those 1940's an 50's videos but i also believe Nukes exist. Maybe this was Americas way of puting up a "Poker Face" almost like the Starwars Programe if u tell someone that hey we have a BIG LASER BEAM in space it changes how the use there rocket powered Nukes an back in 1987 they probaly did not even have it then but now its probly up there ready to blast away at a rocket...just my? thoughts on it. nice vide drop
MILLTICKET7 1 year ago
Who's filming 'em?? A tripod?
seannn10 1 year ago
I emailed to say that LIFE mag had photos of nuclear weapons (some samll ones online) and before TV this must have been a major way to shove this? stuff in the public mind.
ALSO search here for "atom bombs dimensional analysis" for a LIFE picture supposed;y of the first A bomb - it's the same cut out style as in the H bomb picture.
[I posted this before but I think the URLs prevented it getting through]
rerevisionist 1 year ago
There are some Chinese nuclear weapon film on this site. Suffice it to say they show just the same characteristics. The music track, voices, and shots of Chinese people pretending? to be excited have a slightly different propaganda flavour. That's about the only difference.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
I emailed Frank Branaby, whose life work has been supposedly on the control of nuclear weapons. He told me there were no fake films of nuclear weapons! I also emailed all the other people listed as working for the? 'Oxford Research Group'. I suppose it's just another fake charity - the USA of course leads the world here! it's a pity, isn't it. Iwonder what their real function is.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
Barnaby, not Branaby. Not I suppose that it? matters.
****
For some reason my videos don't show up in 'Related Videos' here. Sigh.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
You say there is no question that high-level explosives exist. How do you know? How do we know that anything we see on TV actually exists? I've never actually seen Barack Obama; how do I know he actually exists and isn't? just a caricature? How do I know YOU exist? Why not just doubt everything?
