Making up the 'H-Bomb': What the Myth was for; What they did     2 of 2

Manhattan Project, 'atom bomb', Cold War, spies, 'H-bomb', missile projects, 'neutron bomb', Vanunu, WMD lies

Re: Inventing the H-Bomb: Why that Myth was wanted-what they did

Postby rerevisionist » 12 Jul 2011 03:21

When looking at fake films of 'H Bomb' tests, remember the 'double flash' thing and the problems ---

[1] The first flash (atom bomb) should be completely enclosed in an intact container, and presumably therefore invisible
[2] There should be a tiny interval before fusion takes place; and I do mean tiny!
[3] The fusion reaction is supposed to be megatons - of the order of a thousand times the brightness of the 'atom bomb'.

BUT films show one flash, then a gap of one frame, then - about 1/15 of a second later - the hydrogen fusion flash, of about the same brightness. Oops.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Inventing the H-Bomb: Why that Myth was wanted-what they did

Postby rerevisionist » 26 Jul 2011 09:58

mooninquirer: ...
The exaggeration and hyperbole of HYDROGEN bombs was just too great. There is also the claim that they MIRV the missiles --- they use multiple warheads in EACH missile, with each warhead being in the 50 megaton range. ...


SCALE AND SIZE PROBLEMS WITH H BOMBS

This is supposed to have been the first H bomb test:in 1952 (Ivy Mike, at Eniwetok Atoll)- Due to its physical size and fusion fuel type (cryogenic liquid deuterium) the Mike device was not suitable for use as a thermonuclear weapon; it was intended as an extremely conservative experiment to validate the concepts used for multi-megaton detonations. - says Wikipedia. A 'device' rather than a 'bomb'. (Watch for newsreel comments around this time - there's a British one claiming, falsely, they had an H bomb which could be dropped from a plane, unlike other, more backward, countries).
Image
This is supposed to be a photo of it, with a 'man seated to the right, for scale'.

The point is, to get a huge 'fusion' explosion - assuming this is possible; on the face of it, if fission causes the nuclei of atoms to split, with huge amounts of energy given off, the fusion should be endothermic - a lot of hydrogen/deutreium/tritium whatever would be needed, in the form maybe of a hydride compound. The bigger the bang, the more would be needed. How could this be compressed down into a portable H-bomb?

This is supposed to have been the second H-bomb test, in 1954: Castle Bravo was the code name given to the first U.S. test of a dry fuel thermonuclear hydrogen bomb device, detonated on March 1, 1954 at Bikini Atoll. Wikipedia preuambly quoting the usual official stuff says The device was a very large cylinder weighing 23,500 pounds (10.7 tonnes) and measuring 179.5 inches (4.56 m) in length and 53.9 inches (1.37 m) in width. [citation needed] It was mounted in a "shot cab" on an artificial island built on a reef off Namu Island, in the Bikini Atoll. A sizable array of diagnostic instruments was trained on it, including a number of high-speed cameras which were trained through an arc of mirror towers around the shot cab.
Image

Without going into immense detail, there is clearly a problem, even assuming the physics is correct. In view of the fake photos, and the absurd 'two equal double flashes' rig-up, it's clear the physics is almost certainly faked and unworkable. But there's the further problem of scaling down the amount of hydrogen supposedly needed.

I'd like a debate on this issue! I can't help wondering if Fermi (died 1954 - ten months later) wasn't killed to keep him quiet.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Making up the H-Bomb: Why the Myth was wanted, what they

Postby rerevisionist » 13 Oct 2011 16:31

Summary - How to get away with mass murder

Just to summarise - Jews took control of Russia in 1917, including the finances, which of course were controlled externally, since it was not a developed country. They built up an immense slave labour economy, with covertly organised towns and factories based on western models, and they pillaged Russians for any valuables. The Germans reacted, and no doubt war was inevitable; Stalin very likely planned war against western Europe. Jewish influence continued to increase in the USA, the Manhattan Project fraud being just one part of this. The Jew Eisenhower was promoted despite his inexperience, and his actions included, after the war, in straving large numbers of Germans in eastern Europe.

At this time, the atom bomb was supposed to exist, and was supposed to be a monopoly of the USA. There were some voices in the USA (Forrestal, who was murdered, for example; and McCarthy) who were unhappy about all this. In fact there was a move to threaten the USSR with the supposed atomic weapon. To avoid this threat to Jewish power, and to avoid revelations of what had taken place there, the 'Holocaust' fiction was made up with USSR help, and the supposed H bomb was made up; this would make war 'unthinkable', provided the USSR had the same weapon. Hence there were planted stories of atom spies, mostly Jews; these stories were of course heavily promoted in the Jewish media.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Making up the H-Bomb: Why the Myth was wanted, what they

Postby rerevisionist » 16 Oct 2011 23:02

I'm not suggesting the USA was the only country (in addition, obviously, to the USSR and some eastern European countries) swayed by so-called Jews. Here's Britain during and after the Second World War:--

Extracts from The Fifth Man, Roland Perry, 1994:--
According to two MI5 sources, in 1942 Victor Rothschild became MI5's security inspector, which allowed him into every major research centre. He knew in detail about all British (and often US) weapons developments. Under the guise of the inspector who was checking facilities to see if they were vulnerable to Nazi spying, the Fifth Man became the espionage agent.

British scientific heads of facilities were apprehensive when the respected young lord - the Government's security man - would ring at short notice and make an appointment to check on a laboratory. His imperious demeanour, high intelligence and diligent determination to understand every development in detail, put all who came under his scrutiny in awe and admiration of him. On occasions he actually stole equipment, examined it and sent it back by special messenger to the research centre concerned, with a warning that security should be tightened. Sir Mark Oliphant, one of the great scientists of the era, told me in an interview in January 1994 he experienced this late in 1942 when Rothschild secretly removed a piece of radar equipment from his Birmingham University laboratory.

Each project director lived in fear that MI5's inspector would put in a bad report and that this would lead to a sacking or a budget cut. The thought that he might be spying on them could not have been further from the minds of the scientists with whom he was in contact. (As far as is known Rothschild never reported any one. He simply sent written warnings and reported in general that security was slack.)

Again Colonel 'F' and Colonel 'B' said that late in 1942 or early in 1943, the KGB received radar technology. They claimed that this information from the Fifth was assembled in the form of photos, diagrams and written explanations by him and Blunt...The clarity and visually descriptive nature of the technical data supplied by the Fifth was a trademark of his. By comparison, Rothschild demonstrated in his book, Meditations of a Broomstick, how he took great pride in all areas of his work for MI5 in supplying exact illustrations.

(...)

Rothschild, acting as the security man once more, made several visits in 1943 to Professor G.P. Thompson's laboratory at London's Imperial College. He absorbed the then new alternative method of making the bomb - using plutonium as fuel rather than trying to collect the rare U-235 element of uranium.

Rothschild was again the only person suspected of being the Fifth Man, who had knowledge about this breakthrough area and fitted the other criteria concerning the double agent.

(...)

There was never any attempt by KGB interviewees to conceal Rothschild's links to these scientists or that he was on a short list of ten for recruitment. They were all well aware of him, and those who had been stationed in London, such as Modin, admitted to having known him personally.

(...)

In 1940, Blunt and Burgess were living in Rothschild's leased three-storey maisonette as was his assistant at MI5, Tess Mayor, whom he later married, and Patricia Parry...both left-wing Cambridge graduates. Blunt was important here. Apart from his direct espionage work for the Soviets, he became a key middle-man in passing on data from the Fifth Man and sub-agents, such as Leo Long, to their Soviet Controls.

[The Fifth Man, Roland Perry; 1994 pp. xxii-xxv; Prologue]


As you can see, the book makes a compelling case against Lord Victor Rothschild, whom I believe was never formally uncovered because of his family's massive wealth and influence. Having read the book however, one is left with little doubt that Rothschild was the Fifth Man. He was held in such high esteem in fact, that Churchill entrusted him with testing all his food before it was consumed! Thus he was privy to all sorts of information that was simply unaccessible to other potential spies.

You may be wondering what it is I am postulating, and I shall indeed attempt to explain. In my previous article on the Rothschilds, I quoted from a story published in a British newspaper which asserted that the family had financed both Britain and France during the latter stages of the Napoleonic Wars. The same piece also quoted Nathan Rothschild thus:
"I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply."

The Independent; The Rothschild story: A golden era ends for a secretive dynasty; Friday, 16 April 2004


Indeed, Victor's great-grandfather, Lionel de Rothschild, lent £4,000,000 to Disraeli's government in order to buy a stake in the Suez Canal Company, in 1875. In fact it made Britain the controlling shareholder. This led in turn to Britain and France (a partner) to effectively colonise Egypt, taking control of the country's finances, which led to an uprising:

In 1881, Arabi Pasha who inspired the Egyptian middle classes, led the nationalist rebellion. Gladstone's Liberals had long been against what they believed to be the many wrongs of colonialism. They really wanted nothing to do with expansionism in the Middle East. But Gladstone did not rule the Empire. The money market ruled and the banks wanted immediate action to protect their investments. In 1882, the army under Sir Garnet Wolseley defeated Arabi Pasha's national Islamic uprising at Tel-el-Kebir.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/empire/episodes/episode_63.shtml

In other words, the bankers (Rothschilds) wanted a British military presence in Egypt, one which would ultimately prove very useful in defeating the Ottomans and taking Palestine under British control, when the former threatened Britain's communications with India in 1915.

With Britain looking increasingly likely to secure possession of Palestine, it paved the way for the Balfour Declaration of 1917, a letter addressed to Victor's uncle, Lionel Walter Rothschild, which promised that His Majesty's government would do their utmost to establish 'a national home for the Jewish people' in Palestine. It was a 'declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations', and ultimately led to the creation of Israel. Today Balfour Day is celebrated there on November 2nd.

Arthur Koestler described the Balfour Declaration as a letter in which "one nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third." Many people believe that the territory was part of a deal in which the Rothschilds, in return, used their influence to bring the United States into the Great War, though of course that is conjecture.

Given the information I have produced thus far, I think it is fair to surmise that the Rothschilds' allegiance was not to Britain, but rather to furthering their own interests, and the Zionist cause. The latter is certainly something Victor did, at least according to Roland Perry:
Since late 1947, Rothschild had also helped persuade the Soviets to sell arms to Israel and was able to specify sources, particularly in Czechoslovakia where he had discovered the abandoned supplies at the end of the war.

The cost to the Jewish military was low. It was a buyer's market with war surplus material cached in about twenty countries. Until Rothschild interceded, the only buyers not allowed into the market were Zionists. Czech rifles, machine-guns and ammunition were bought and smuggled into Palestine in March by merchant ships despite a naval blockade.

[The Fifth Man, Roland Perry; 1994; pp. 177-178]
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Making up the 'H-Bomb': What the Myth was for; What they

Postby rerevisionist » 28 Feb 2012 06:42

The 'Lucky Dragon' Japanese fishing boat incident, supposedly caught in radioactivity in the Pacific

It just occurs to me to mention the 'Lucky Dragon' here; there are several other comments in this site, but a comment belongs here as the incident was part of the H bomb myth. The name is claimed to be the translation of the name of a Japanese fishing boat. It was supposed to have been caught in radiation after an 'H Bomb' test in 1954, and various announcements and stories were circulated. (There's a cartoon on Youtube about it). The idea was to reinforce the claims of 'deadly radiation' making war 'unthinkable', so no action would be taken against the Stalin and the USSR. This of course suited the Jews running the USSR, or running the technology. It was also used to make the Japanese look like victims. In fact of course, the small volume of neutrons available from such a blast - even assuming it could be made to work - spread over thousands of square miles would have little effect.

Stalin died not long after this incident; probably murdered, and probably with some connection with 'nuclear science'.

However, the story was and still is highly successful.
This is from a chatroom literally today:
"I'm in Canada. You're gonna feel the effects of toasting long before I will. ... The fallout will waft across Europe and maybe drop into the ocean on its way here. ... Canada is not in the cross-hairs for nuclear anything...we're a peace loving nation and we're not on the flight path to Washington or any other US destination... [someone might be] horribly disfigured by nuclear fallout... Now I'm worried..."


Most of the 'Lucky Dragon' crew lived till old age; some died of liver cancer, possibly related to mercury in tuna fish.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Return to Nuke Scams Past: Nuclear Plans & Conspiracies & Funds, Wars, Hoax Maintenance


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest