[NUKELIES]

Thought I would start with the obvious.

Note on 9/11 inserted 9th August 2015:
There's some sort of movement, no doubt pushed by sayanim Jews, to pretend 9/11 was a nuclear explosion, or series of 'mini nukes', which of course are impossible under the 'critical mass' idea.

Why would anyone want to claim this nonsense?

The reason is most likely that the action of the traitor mayor, 'Rudy' Giuliani, in getting the steel remains shipped off to China without any examination, came under scrutiny. So the Jewish liars want to pretend the steel disappeared of its own accord.

Believe that—if you're a two year old child. - Rerev

[FirstClassSkeptic]

I disagree: It was a Mossad job.

It took me three days after it happened to figure that out.

[rerevisionist]

Isn't that what Jesse meant by an 'inside job'? Or near enough?

[mooninquirer]

Yes, the moment one realizes that 911 was an inside job, he also realizes that it could only have been down by Jews. I prefer to say that the Zionist Jews within the US did it, as opposed to the Mossad, although the Mossad played a role. The big player was the media, which is controlled by Zionist Jews, the Defense policy board of the Pentagon ( all Jews ), everyone affiliated with the world trade center ( all Jews ), the Jew Michael Chertoff, who later became head of the Department of Homeland Security, who allowed the Mossad agents to go back to Israel, and Phil Zelikow, a dual citizen of Israel who wrote the 911 Commission report. There are actually many more Jews. For a run down on the long list of Jews at every critical juncture of 911, just google : ISRAEL DID 911

[rerevisionist]

9/11 and the BBC - if you want to archive BBC archive 9/11 tenth anniversary lies, don't take too long!

With 11th September approaching, people who like digital archives should note that many BBC programmes disappear after about one week; they say this is for copyright reasons. The BBC will of course broadcast endless lies.

[Watch for the WTC7 blunders!]

[rerevisionist]

If you want a laugh, listen to Eliza Manningham-Buller, alleged head of MI5. (I don't personally believe someone so stupid ever was head of anything). She 'assesses the lasting significance of 9/11 in the first of her Reith Lectures'.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0145x77/The_Reith_Lectures_Securing_Freedom_2011_Eliza_ManninghamBuller_Terror/

This sort of rubbish is the BBC's idea of 'ruffling feathers'. I wonder what the Jews in the USA thought when she turned up. Oy vey.

[rerevisionist]

Best presentation I've seen of 9/11 and computer-generated images (CGI)

The main video on this page
http://www.septemberclues.info/
is a very well-edited summary of the whole 9/11 fraud. It relies almost entirely on stuff broadcast on US TV. It seems to be linked to this site http://www.cluesforum.info which has supplementary material for example on manufactued 'victims' ('vicsims') of 911. Throughly recommended. (NB I have no connection with these people; and there may be better presentations I don't know of).

[rerevisionist]

I don't know how many people have heard of United 93, a 2006 film directed by someone called Paul Greengrass, who seems to do a lot of fake pseudo-factual material; I don't know if he's funded by Jews, or thinks he is Jewish. There was a short item about it on the BBC's godawful 'Film' series - Film 2011 in this case, a recent episode, which included about seven minutes on Anonymous, on de Vere/Shakespeare, with amateurish comments by the two moronic hacks fronting the programme.

[rerevisionist]

Red Cross as a huge fraud

From CNN U.S.; this appears to be dated 2001, only two months after the Jewish attack:

Red Cross defends handling of Sept. 11 donations
WORLD TRADE CENTER
November 06, 2001

Charities swung into action after the September 11 terrorist attacks, raising more than $1 billion. But questions are being raised about where and how and how much of that money is being distributed.

Bearing the brunt Tuesday during a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee's oversight panel was outgoing Red Cross President Dr. Bernadine Healy.

The Red Cross has raised more than $564 million for the Liberty Fund, which was set up in response to the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

While the agency states on its Web site that it is spending more than any other relief agency responding to the terrorist attacks, it has distributed only $154 million.

Healy was hammered by one New York official for the Red Cross' decision to put aside nearly half of the money raised for future needs that may include terrorist attacks.

"I see the Red Cross, which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars that was intended by the donating public to be used for the victims of September 11 -- I see those funds being sequestered into long-term plans for an organization," testified New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer.

Healy later told CNN the Red Cross was a service organization and that previous donations had prepared the agency to deal with September 11.

"We had planned for a weapon of mass destruction attack," she said. "We knew our obligations under the congressional charter. We knew it involved victim assistance and sheltering. We knew that it involved with dealing with rescue workers. We knew that it involved blood."

She also noted that some of the new funding went toward helping communities learn how to deal with other threats such as anthrax.

The hearing was contentious, with panel members trying to get at the issue of donor intent and whether the Red Cross misled donors.

"What's at issue here is that a special fund was established for these families. It was specially funded for this event, September 11," said Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-Louisiana.

"And it is being closed now because we are told enough money's been raised in it, but we're also being told, by the way, we're going to give two-thirds of it away to other Red Cross needs."

The subcommittee asked Healy and her agency to provide the exact language of all of its television and newspaper appeals for donations.

Healy said what the agency has learned is it needs to explain to the public the mission of the Red Cross.

[rerevisionist]

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT NOBODY DIED ON 9/11

Very good piece by 'hoi.polloi'
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=482

Includes a great deal of info on a Jewish company specialising in media deceit, and the probability that all the 'spontaneous' missing person fliers stuck up all round Manhattan were faked by that company.

[Heiwa]

http://letsrollforums.com/only-photogra ... 14p44.html
is a good thread about the same matter ... and no Jews lurking in the shadows.

[rerevisionist]

Well, it's not the same topic. My first one was on faking victims - or making up simulated victims known as vicsims - and running a scam photocopying pages to be stuck up around Manhattan Island. Yours is about photos supposedly taken within the twin tower buildings, when they were liable to come down. However, I agree, it's a good thread. Whether there are no Jews, however, would need following up....