U.S. War Crimes in Vietnam

Rae West 1998, 1999, 2000, 2013, 2018, 2019

My article is based around the work of Bertrand Russell (1872-1970), whose last years, from 1962, were blighted by this war. This is a revisionist piece, drawing attention to the part played by Jews, behind the scenes. The items are roughly in date order, and highlight the way Russell became aware of the issues. However, it has to be said uncompromisingly that he was entirely taken in by the nuclear weapons fraud and by other aspects of Jewish corruption, including the 'Holocaust' fraud, control over the media, Lyndon Johnson's Jewish agenda including anti-white immigration, the Kennedy murder and paper money, and the use of Americans as 'useful idiots' and homicidal thugs.

Note: most Americans will have been propagandised by their Jewish media; such phrases as 'Who will carry the can for failure in Vietnam?' illustrate the sort of thing. In fact, the war was won. Jews made fortunes for about 20 years (1954-1974) from building bases, building ships and helicopters, making bombs; more were used than during the entirety of the Second World War, as a common meme. Johnson wanted to get US gold for Jews, and build up debt, of course to be paid to Jews in perpetuity. They used chemical warfare, made money from prostitution in the Jewish manner. It's probably impossible to get a serious assessment; but Rothschilds appear to control the money issue, getting their percentage from the entire country. Land and assets must be owned by Jews. Rents of course too—a standard Jewish aim in wars.
Probably many Americans—not (((Americans)))—still can't understand this, even if they can understand 'veterans' getting little in the way of support—typically, less than illegal immigrants get. If you find all this puzzling, try to get up to speed about Jews. And remember, if you are/were a war criminal, there are outstanding accounts against you, which Jews exploit in (for example) opposing whites in Africa.

Bertrand Russell's 1967 book War Crimes in Vietnam is downloadable here in pdf format (about 50 MB).

A few notes:
Russell accepts all the Jewish mythology about the Second World War, including Churchill as a hero standing alone. (There's a comment on the Jew Lyndon Johnson, who compared a Vietnam puppet to Churchill—more accurately than Russell could have known). Hitler of course was assumed to be the ultimate evil. Russell also, despite his supposed scientific awareness, never had suspicions that the 'nuclear weapon' threat might be a simple fraud.
Pham van Dong is quoted at the end as an opponent of imperialism; presumably he was another Jew puppet. He says people in the USA and Europe have benefited from the bombing! In fact Jews, owning weaponry and politicians, and the possibility of running the central bank in Vietnam, made money.
Russell starts with a discussion of the French in Vietnam. Presumably this was a Jewish-financed construction, just as the 'British' Empire involved India, China and the opium wars, and South Africa, and those are before the 20th century Jewish conflicts. The French Empire, or (((French Empire))) was part of post-Napoleonic complexity, and listed by Faurisson as one of the four giants, the others being USA, USSR, and the British Empire, opposed to three dwarves of Germany, Japan, and Italy.
Roman Catholicism is relevant to Vietnam, where puppet rulers seem to have been Catholic. However, please understand that Christianity was put in place by Jews, and can't be assumed to be hostile to Jews.
Russell and the New York Times is a painful exchange between the naive Russell and Sulzberger, Ochs, and others. Russell's family had been involved, in England, in emancipating Jews, and he never faced the possibility that Jews were a huge parasitically evil distributed nation, even though he was aware that mass murder in the USSR was Jewish.
Trying to decode spooks and supports is fascinating. I'd guess the Viet Minh were Jewish promotees; Ho Chi Minh too is suspected of being a Jew agent, even if he didn't know it. Russell took 'Revolutions' at face value, unaware that thousands of cryptos behind the scenes were needed for each front man. All his life he accepted the myths of the Dreyfus Affair, for example.
There's a very short chapter on China and bombing. I'd guess it was a scare story. Obviously, Russell had no idea about Jews in China, or in Japan.
Russell says nothing at all about money and profiteering; he was friendly with Keynes, so this is suspicious, or evidence of laziness. He also says nothing about land-ownership, company ownership, and other sources of easy money when you have it.
There are no photos in this book. These could have packed more punch than the book. Russell said in his Autobiography that he was surprised it was published; and owed Unwin gratitude. But of course in fact it's largely a propaganda exercise, anti-white and omitting Jews.
Russell wrote a chapter on the 'Labour Party' in Britain, which he'd helped in a small way, without ever realising it had Jewish roots and was in thrall to Jewish money, and no doubt set up for the purpose. His tearing up of his Labour Party membership card in mentioned.
Russell has a longish footnote on the word 'Vietcong', invented, in typical Jewish fashion, as propaganda.
Russell regarded the US genocide as a war by 'Americans', of course a handy place for Jews such as Kissinger to hide. To this day, many Americans can't understand this. For example, Kevin MacDonald never mention atrocities by the US, even though they are a Jewish responsibility.
There's a list of members of the War Crimes Tribunal. Many are Jews and fellow-travellers; I'd guess the Jewish shepherds knew people would be unlikely to take seriously people such as Isaac Deutscher, the Jewish biographer and supporter of Stalin. There was a disappointing shortage of normal decent people.
Lots more; a good poke is needed. Note: this book has not been published, even by the Canadian organisation set out to record his life. What scum they are.

Russell was a dupe of Jews all his life, as this piece explains in detail. | Bertrand Russell's last public writing On American Violence

History of the buildup to the Vietnam War. Forum discussion with a long magisterial essay by Russell on the history of the Vietnam and the Vietnam War, including of course French and Japanese invasions. The American invasions are generally dated from about the time of the battle of Dien Bien Phu (1954).

The essays in War Crimes in Vietnam were published, at first, in rather obscure American publications, mostly by Jewish fake radicals, and passed largely unnoticed until published as a collection in 1967, which was about the time the Bertrand Russell War Crimes Tribunal was announced. Russell dates his involvement from 1962, from his reading of the Jewish-owned New York Times. (There are long detailed and very saddening accounts on Vietnam, and the reactions to his work, in the final chapter of his autobiography, The Foundation, in Volume 3).

First chapter of Russell's War Crimes in Vietnam The New York Times and its deliberate lies about Vietnam. These letters were not published by the Jew York Times as it's often wittily known..

Chapter 2 War and Atrocity in Vietnam—cancer and deformity-inducing chemicals, 'strategic hamlets', killing of food, forced prostitution.

Appendix: eye witness accounts of effects of bombing and American action

Bertrand Russell Vietnam War Crimes Tribunal (two sessions, in 1967). Looking back, Russell was 'controlled'—there was no 'cui bono' investigation of war profits, or of Jewish involvement in the genocide. Most Jews involved were far more interested in Palestine, where there was war at the time, itself supported by the Jew (or perhaps crypto-Jew) Lyndon Johnson who wanted the attack on the Liberty to provoke US war against Egypt. This file is book-length (approx 1 MB) with internal links.
[ Matorosso: Tribunal Rules | Burchett | Caldwell | Chomsky | Russell | Tariq Ali | Kolko 1944-1944 | Fragmentation Bombs | Bombing | Victims | Dikes | Napalm | Chemical Warfare including DOW and MONSANTO | Torture | Thailand, Philippines, Japan | Testimonies: four Vietnamese & Tuck & Martinsen & Duncan | Verdicts: Stockholm & Roskilde | Sartre on genocide List of Members, Reporters, Witnesses ]

James Hildreth, a pilot on genocide by Americans; I don't know the source of this
Elizabeth Helfman on Ecological Warfare with permission

A film was (apparently) shown at the Stockholm War Crimes Trial in 1967, and mentioned in the book "I Protest" by David Douglas Duncan, published in 1968.

"It runs for seventeen uninterrupted minutes without a soundtrack. The film—black and white—is of rather poor technical quality, which is understandable when one learns it was made from copies of TV films, newsreels, magazine and newspaper photos. There is no footage made by any Communist cameraman, no photo made by a Communist photographer. Every inch of the film was made by Western, non-Communist newsmen working for our television, magazine or newspaper services. And the film is a heartbreaker, so appalling as to defy total mental recall by a professional reporter. It shows American and South Vietnamese soldiers torturing, beating, mutilating Viet Cong and suspected 'Viet Cong' prisoners; others, dead, are dragged off triumphantly behind tanks and amtracs. Villages, of course, are razed and burned; babies are left dying—also burned; and there isn't a sound from the screen. The filmmakers obtained no permission from the Western agencies owning the rights to the original shots—in fact the pictures were all pirated. So these seventeen minutes will probably never be seen on any commercial American TV or theater screen. But they should. For then each of us would understand what truly hideous acts have taken place in the name of bringing democracy and 'our way of life' to South Vietnam."

So far as I know the McMaster people have never mentioned this film.

"Winter Soldier" by Winterfilm (1972), was fairly well-known at the time (I remember a 'review' by Peregrine Worsthorne, I think then of the Daily Telegraph, saying he didn't believe it).

I had originally intended to write up more on the subject of (for want of a better word) 'neo-Nazis' in the US, using the expression to refer to racism and the use of secret violence illegal under international law. From the propaganda viewpoint, the obvious referents are newspaper people such as Conrad Black, Murdoch, various Sulzbergers, the BBC, and all the other 'neo-Nazi' apologists.

But of course this understates the part played by the principals; for example, I recall a few years ago some US major, or something, who became briefly famous for his activities as a pimp in Vietnam—perhaps West Point has a special ceremony, no wives, cash only? What terrific guys these people must be to have a drink with, eh? Big-lies Home Page

Ecological warfare Mass killings
Russell had little information on Korea; or on Catholics— connection via the French empire and its S E Asia puppets, and US Cardinals. Or Jews—connection via US business and politics. Most such information is still heavily censored.

Photos from Against the crime of silence (1968). Please appreciate that the selection is tiny and excludes vast amounts of pictorial horror.

HTML Rae West. First uploaded 98-06-07. Rev 2000-05-07. 2000-04-30: Schoenman's piece 'Report from North Vietnam' (1966) removed at his request; he claimed then he had copyright. 2013-01-09 new edit for big-lies.org. Lower-case links 11-11-2018

Photos added 14 Jan 2021