"ln an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four.

I am confident that no one will disagree with me when I state that most leaders in the government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland are the lapdogs of the rulers of the US - and that, whatever they say or do, 'our' leaders follow the latter like rats did the pied piper, regardless of whether it is in our national interests or not.

Knowing this, we must look into who truly has control over the US Government, who mans the oligarchy of power within the United States, who are those who have the power to say what's what and what our next move will be.

I am also confident that no one will disagree when I say that this 'war on terror'- including the war on Iraq - has been against our national interests: a war into which we had no reason to go headlong and one that has given so much fuel to the hate against our nation in the Middle Eastern World (those who understand that our foreign policy is governed by our unconditional subservience to the United States and support of Israel). This is not to mention the outright lies about 'weapons of mass destruction', the claims that Saddam Hussein was a 'direct threat' to our nation, and that those who waged war on America and the Western World by crashing two planes into the World Trade Centre did so because they "hated our freedom."

It was because of the pro-Israel oligarchy within the US Government and the total Jewish control of the news and entertainment media in America - a more powerful weapon than bombs and missiles, and one that can change the minds of millions and manipulate the world - that those planes struck.

This is far from an 'anti-Semitic' statement by some wild-eyed 'racist'. It is, rather, a fact easily confirmed by research. I hope this short essay will encourage some to do a little more research and to make decisions for themselves on these issues.

In 1998, on the American ABC network, Osama Bin Laden gave his views very clearly on why he opposed America. Here are some excerpts:-

'I say to them that they (the Americans) have put themselves at the mercy of a disloyal government, and this is most evident in Clinton's administration. We believe that it represents Israel inside America. Take the sensitive ministries such as the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defence and the CIA, you will find that the Jews have the upper hand in them. They make use of America to further their plans for the world... For over half a century, Muslims in Palestine have been slaughtered and assaulted (by the Israelis) and robbed of their honour and of their property. Their houses have been blasted, their crops destroyed.'

So I ask: Is 'anti-Semitism' never a result of Jewish behaviour?

Britain potential terrorist target

Due to the United Kingdom's unconditional support of the US Government - and the latter's and our unconditional support of Israel - we are the country which, next to the US, is most likely to be attacked by terrorists. We have let Jewish supremacists take control of Britain, its leaders and its policies, which are ultimately in total opposition to our national interests.

American National Alliance spokesman Kevin Alfred Strom, speaking on the 'American Dissident Voices' broadcast on the 6th September 2003, said: "Next to the United States, Britain is probably the country most firmly under the Jewish thumb."

Do you start to feel uneasy when I say that we are controlled by a cabal of Jewish Supremacists? Then please give your attention to a statement made by President Ariel Sharon when speaking to Shimon Peres on the Kol Yisrael radio station October 3, 2001:-

'Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that... I want to tell you something very clear. Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it.'

This clearly confirms what I and many others have been saying. And Sharon is not the only source. In 2003, US Rep. James Moran made the this daring statement:-

'If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq we would not be doing this. The leaders of the Jewish community are influential enough that they could change the direction of where this is going, and I think they should.'

Later, Mr. Moran fell on his knees and apologised - but the facts remain the same. On this side of the ocean, long-time MP Tam Dalyell, in an interview with Vanity Fair magazine last May, referred to a Jewish 'cabal'. Later, defending this on Radio Four's 'World at One' programme, he said:-

'The cabal that I referred to was in the US... There is far too much Jewish influence in the United States.'

And he went on to say of one body:

'That is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. I was thinking of [Paul] Wolfowitz, Deputy Defence Minister [Richard] Perle, [John] Bolton, Assistant Secretary of State, [Douglas] Feith, [Ken] Adelman, [Elliot] Abrams and [Ari] Fleischer [Mr Bush's press secretary]. Those people drive this policy.'

Dalyell said that the Government of the US is "being unduly influenced by a cabal of Jewish advisers." He also confirmed Jewish influence in Britain, thus:-

'I am worried about my country being led up the garden path on a Likudnik [Ariel] Sharon agenda... Straw, Mandelson & Co. are leading a tremendous drive to sort out the Middle East.'

Michael Lord Levy, Tony Blair's chief fund-raiser and personal envoy to the Middle East, also Jewish, received mention from Dalyell as well:-

'I believe his influence has been very important on the Prime Minister and has led to what I see as this awful war and the sack of Baghdad.'

Dalyell later went on to say that he had "picked out one person [in Britain] about whom I am extremely concerned, and I have to be blunt about it. That is Lord Levy." Finally, he rightly asserted that: "The British people have been deceived."

The United Kingdom is being turned into a Third World slum by uncontrolled non-white immigration. It is being plagued by dramatic increases in criminal violence, racial tension, AIDS and cultural discord since the multi-racialist experiment began here, along with a growing anti-white bias in the news and entertainment media. These policies are being financed and led, in large part, by Jewish supremacists through our Government and media.

From the horse's mouth

One example among many of outright Jewish admittance of their control was in the August 1996 issue of Moment magazine, which had as its headline 'Jews run Hollywood - so what?' Michael Medved, a well-known Jewish film critic, wrote this piece, in which he stated:-

'It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and predominance in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognisably Jewish names.'

I will leave you now with one last quote, a fitting one and one to which I certainly subscribe:-

'Whether or not One World is the secret final objective of Zionism, World Jewry is the most powerful single force on earth, and it follows that all the major policies which have been ruthlessly pursued through the last several decades must have had the stamp of Jewish approval. Indeed, common sense applied to such facts as have come to light must lead to the conclusion that the policies, directed against the most cherished Gentile values, were incubated by adroit Jewish brains and fulfilled, or carried to the verge of fulfilment, by the dynamism of the Jewish spirit. At the same time, so many Gentiles are associated with the conspiracy, both directly and through the formation of fronts, there are so many Gentile agents and agencies, and so many Gentile governments which have acquiesced in the conspiracy by falling into line with policies inimical to their own national interests, that it would be ludicrous to offload onto Jewish shoulders responsibility for the destruction, or near destruction, of Christendom and the Western World. Nevertheless, it would be equally ludicrous to deny the Jewish part, especially where it is admitted...

'Had we of the Gentile nations stood firm in defence of our own traditions and values, instead of cravenly capitulating, the Jews would have remained what they ought to be - a small sect living contentedly and at peace with their neighbours, exercising neither national nor international power and entertaining no inordinate ambitions. That, as I wrote at the outset, is how most of them actually do live. That a minority of them has been able to mount such a stupendous drive for world power is not their fault but ours alone, and it is we who must put things right - or perish. The way to put things right is not to engage in 'hate campaigns' (which in any event more often than not play into Jewish hands) but to make a determined stand for our own legitimate and distinctive interests.'