In an always competitive world, no business can survive without
"brand loyalty", in other words the ability to attract and
retain customers. Consequently, it is obviously important to direct
advertising and sales strategy towards those sections of the population
whose custom is most valued and worthwhile in the longer term. In the
short term, of course, a business might take the view that, so long as
their money is good, all customers are the same.
In some cases this attitude is unexceptionable and, perhaps, inescapable; but it has to be borne in mind that such an indiscriminate
policy may alienate at least as many potential customers as it attracts.
Would you, for example, use a dentist who was quite happy to include drug
addicts, HIV/AIDS carriers and common criminals among his clients? Would
you patronise a bar or restaurant with the same policy? Would you buy a
shotgun from a dealer just as ready to sell it to a crook as long as
he wasn't caught doing so?
In short, would you buy anything from a firm which clearly disregarded
every consideration except making a "fast buck"? Surely no
decent and sensible person would want to be seen helping such unworthy
businesses to survive and prosper.
During the German occupation of much of Europe in the last war,
many businesses were seen to value their alien customers no less than
native citizens. Some even prospered for a while, but paid heavily for
their disloyalty later.
The situation in Britain today is much the same: there are businesses
perfectly content - even eager - to sell their wares to the huge
numbers of invaders from the Third World and Eastern Europe. Indeed -
and even without a renegade government's encouragement - some of them
would make a virtue of their perfidious sales policy.
Collaboration with government
The advertising industry in particular is manifestly in collaboration
with the Government's social engineering campaigns: its products are
loaded with gratuitous pictures of aliens out of all proportion to
their actual numbers in the population. This is obvious from press
and magazine adverts, public hoardings, leaflets and catalogues and,
most of all, commercial breaks on TV. Whatever else these advertisers
may have in mind, they all seem to be singing from the same hymn sheet
where endorsement of the multi-racial society is concerned. Their
common message seems to be that the alien occupation of Britain is
something they are perfectly happy to accept, and that they assume
everybody else feels the same way.
Well, we've got news for them. The native British people have
never seen a market research or government questionnaire which asked
if they approved of mass immigration or multi-racialism.
They have never been asked if they believed these alien newcomers
to be as deserving as themselves - if not more so - of everything
from social service benefits, housing, employment, education and
health care to the content of almost every radio and TV programme
and media publication.
Parents are assumed to accept the indoctrination of their children
at school with multi-racialist propaganda they themselves would
instinctively reject.
And to crown all this, we have the leaders of all the main
political parties saying in public that they look forward to the
day when Britain has a black prime minister!
Sooner rather than later, all businesses must face up to their
moral as well as commercial obligations, regardless of governmental
pressures to be "undiscriminating" in their dealings,
employment policies and sales promotions. Meanwhile, to the extent
that they give prominence to multi-racialism in advertisements and
employment policies, they forfeit the brand loyalty of countless
native Britons.
In times of war - that is to say, of threatened invasion - anyone
seen to give aid and succour to would-be invaders faced the capital
penalty for treason. The fact that the present invasion is not by
force of arms, but by government collaboration, does not alter the
personal duty of every native citizen to resist it by every means
necessary. This must of course be tempered by the need, in this case,
to operate within the laws of the land - not because those laws, in
as much as they govern racial matters, are just and right, but only
because it is expedient to observe them rather than courting
prosecution and prison for not doing so.
And where the invasion and occupation are assisted by commercial
advertisers, the most powerful weapon of resistance to it is the way
we spend our time and money.
Using our power
So let every genuine patriot exercise that power to the utmost
in his or her everyday shopping and patronage, since to give one's
custom to companies which manifestly promote multi-racialism is
tantamount to collaborationism - in other words, treason. In short,
if we don't "buy" multi-racialism, either commercially
or politically, it cannot prosper.
And those business concerns still retaining any loyalty to the
British people have a corresponding duty to express this loyalty in
all their under-takings. They must "show the flag" at every
opportunity. If they want our brand loyalty, they must first
demonstrate their loyalty to us!
To that end, the British National Party should be asking British
firms to "show the flag" in one way or another in their
brand logos and advertisements, and to eschew multi-racialist material
to the limit of their powers under present law. For example, since
according to official figures aliens now comprise not more (?)
than about six per cent of the population, they should not appear
in greater proportion in commercial advertisements or numbers hired
by companies. And where they are disproportionately represented we
are no longer looking at advertisements but at political propaganda.
The same applies, of course, to the casting and content of radio
and TV programmes.
So let every designer of advertising and broadcast material
be reminded of this, not least by potential clients.
In its turn, the BNP, as standard-bearer for the British people,
should take measures to identify those business concerns most
deserving of patron age by the degree of their non-collaboration
in the output of multi-racialist propaganda, and encourage its
supporters to patronise them.
The concept of "buying British" should apply not only
to giving customer loyalty to companies based in the United Kingdom
in preference to those based abroad; it should also apply to
patronising those particular UK companies which do not fall over
themselves to promote multi-racialism in their advertising and
hiring policies.
Locally and nationally, such a genuinely "buy-British"
campaign could exert a very powerful countervailing force against
perfidious legislation and propaganda. In every city, town and
village the patriotic exercise of purchasing power becomes the right
and duty of all our people - and something beyond the power of
government to suppress!
In the form of favoured products and premises and selective
boycotts, all shoppers, along with football club supporters and
market research interviewees, have the means at their disposal
to demonstrate their patriotism in a very practical way. Let the
world see that we are in the business of investing in our future!