Reviews by Subject:-
Film, TV, DVDs, CDs, Critics | Jews, Christians, Moslems | Race | Revisionism | Women
Reviews by Author:- Richard Dawkins | Martin Gardner ('Skeptic') | Bertrand Russell | H G Wells
Michael Portillo is a Marrano Jew, once a politician of sorts in the Thatcherite 'Conservative' Party. He fronts series distributed by BBC TV programmes; as usual there are vast numbers of producers and support staff, and as usual the process is obscure. The series starts with Bradshaw, the Victorian railway guide known to everyone at the time, perhaps being promoted as a reprint, and if so presumably one single edition; I don't know. Portillo's presentation relies on bold single-colour jackets and non-matching trousers. Portillo must have been successful enough to lead to follow-up series, in Europe, and the USA. It's hard for Jews to avoid their own history: Portillo did a look at Toledo, a Jewish strongpoint—see Miles Mathis on Jesuits and Toledo. There's more emphasis on towns, old technology, historical artefacts, and some modern things (nuclear submarines?) than in the rail enthusiast types of film/video. There are also curious examples of Portillo carrying out do-it-himself samples of mixing cakes, dancing about, mimicking adventures, doing woodwork, in which the idea probably is to put the goyim into their places, as carrying out their mundane repetitive tasks.
Amid the fairly accurate material is submerged history. I don't want (and can't be bothered) to give detailed examples, beyond "One of our greatest leaders—Winston Churchill". But watch for Jewish standards: the erasure of wars and their funding, 'revolutions', deaths, immigration into other people's countries— not Israel, divide and rule—remembering that it is, of course, difficult to spot what isn't there. Portillo is a sort of polystyrene padding, a Jewish fake 'Conservative', reading out his cards or whatever in a uniform style, whether pretending to be interested in some industrial product or historical location or person or story or weak pun. I don't think he's intelligent enough to even have an opinion; he just quotes what he's been told, and has a uniform to try to stand out a bit. Sometimes he graces low IQ news interviews, with nonentities like Andrew Neil and that fat black token female MP. I noted other travel TV things from Portillo, painfully embarrassing in their Jewish style. For example events in Europe, Russia, the USA, from which the Jewish criminalities have been erased. It's quite hard to convey how bad his rubbish is; part of the art of Jewish TV is converting brightness into an anaesthetic and comatic state, appropriately enough, like that induced by looking out of railway train windows where not much attracts the attention. Fronts like Portillo are useful to the status quo; like overpaid newsreaders, there's no intermediary validation of their material. Christ for intelligent use of what once promised to be a wonderful medium.
A 2020 programme has Portillo describing himself as "English". Jews love to tell lies. I watched a part of a segment on the National Library of Wales, fronted by a silly woman of the sort promoted as a supposed leader—simple, ordinary, repeating her little script. Amusingly, a Welsh translation of a Bible was brought in by a man with white gloves. Pretending this trash was of tremendous value.
Just three issues, inserted later:
[1] Luddites. A tangential reference to this topic in one episode. I take it the point here was that several inventions, which between them automated much of cloth production, led to a battle; you can almost smell Portillo's relief in the victory of ownership by money purchase over some other outcome, spreading the benefits and costs over some other group: locals, nationals, or whatever.
[2] Homosexuality. Somewhere I noted a reference to Portillo in this context; I have no idea if it's true. But it prompted me to think of a possible entry for Jews into aristocracies. Just as Esther (is it?) is lauded as a model for Jewish women, presumably young males could be an entry-point for some suitably-inclined aristocrats. Probably there are Talmudic tales praising bumboys. But the point I'm groping for here is the Church's reaction. Just as the Church made interest forbidden, keeping up the Jewish monopoly, so did the Church outlaw homosexuality to give Jews a chance. Seems likely enough, anyway. With of course variations: the Church of England was or still is freighted with homosexuals.
[3] Nuclear weapons, power, and energy in e.g. helpfully-invisible submarines, all look like frauds. Portillo is of course worthless as a guide. But as another hired propagandist he'll do.
I just watched Portillo on Dawlish, a south coast port town from which William of Orange, plus mercenaries, installed Jews in Britain with the 'Bank of England'. We saw some simple woman doing her drivel about it. All great fun; all devoid of intelligence.
I've watched him in Jarrow, once the biggest shipbuilding place in Europe—at least, so we are told. If I recall correctly, a pink-pullovered chap in Jarrow Town Hall was doing his spiel; probably the right word. Fortunately, the Second World War saved Jarrow—the workers had to work! This is a common theme with Jewish commentators; after a depression, easily engineered by the controllers of money, the poor buggers become something like mercenaries: America's 'Great Depression' then war overtime, women before WW1 then war work; the same story has been repeated world-wide. The only people not expected to do their bit are Jew financiers.
It took me some time to understand the basis for his 'narrative structure'; his role is to interface with goyim summoning enough amiability to survive for a few minutes, white the goy carries out some task, which is handed to Portillo—making a pork pie, pulling on a lever, shaping the first phases of a pottery object—before leaving for the next railway station. Alternatively, a museum curator, or country-house keeper, or fellow Jewish politician or antiquarian gives an official view, as in Pitkin guides or A-level history. Churchill, William Wilberforce, Napoleon, slave-owners, the East India Company insofar as it shows up on Jewish radar, get their restricted standard minutes. (On slavery abolition, the piece by Leaf Gerrit at http://www.mileswmathis.com/wilber.pdf may open your eyes). Portillo in Spain was another sad thing: 'anarchist' bomb-throwing, of course by Jews, nothing on long-term festering of relations with Spain, nothing on atrocities in the Spanish 'Civil War'; nothing on why Hitler avoided Gibraltar.
As with many Jews, what appears at first sight to be personal quirks or foibles grow to appear more sinister. I've just watched Portillo say Los Angeles in defined by its history, or some low meaning crap. Most 'Angelinos' are he said (some euphemism for mestizo Spanish). What he concealed was Jewish policy to pay, with Jewish control of the Fed dollars, for invasions into the USA. In just such a way smiling Kommissars would cover up Jewish murders in the USSR.
We see Portillo, craning his neck over a French girl in Paris. She tells him there were 'anarchists' in about 1905. Portillo smirks; he knows they were Jews wanting war, and that for example suffragettes were part of the war movement. She tells him the French Revolution was important; Portillo smirks at the goy, knowing of course that the (((French Revolution))) was another Jewish thing.
Portillo features his Victorian Bradshaw's Guide to the railways; his bulky volume, mostly short descriptions with timetables, is from 1913, a fateful year. Portillo often repeats something like None of them—travellers, holiday makers—could know that their world would be swept away by the outbreak of the First World War.. which of course is not true; plotters among Jews and Freemasons were planning for a lucrative war. And of course they got it. 'Outbreak' of war is a handy evasion of the truth. Throughout these excursions, wars are dismissed and waved away. If there were wars in which Jews died, I'd expect concentration on them; but of course they didn't happen. Some of these wars were very destructive; examples include the Opium Wars and Boer Wars (and US 'civil war'), all with huge benefits to Jews but not the dead.
I watched Portillo on Russian railways, mostly St Petersburg and the later capital Moscow. Expecting teams of Jews (the producer was Alison Kreps) to say anything honest about Russia is as likely as Jews being honest on William of Orange and England. He repeats, in a solid colour jacket no doubt colour-coded in some way, the mythology of 1905, the 'Great War' 'breaking out', the Tsar's abdication, and bits more (such as Lenin in a sealed train, with the permission of the Germans; or perhaps (((Germans)))!) but not much. When he was younger, he was actually in Margaret Thatcher's cabinet, and believed in the 'Cold War' and nuclear missiles aimed at Moscow, no doubt a subset of partitioned Jewish frauds worldwide. He included a once-BBC 'man' in Russia, Martin Sixsmith, no doubt a Jew, the subservient type, not the more usual aggressive liar type. As far as I know, Miles Williams Mathis is the first to re-examine this old and proletarian junk propaganda, like an archaeologist using new tools to clear way accumulations of Jew junk. Portillo of course is very insistent on the Jewish lies of the supposed extermination of Jews. Let's hope the leaking walls of the sort of Kremlin enclosures of lies, surrounding each of the frauds promoted by Jews, put up by hired nonentities, will give way soon.
An episode (this is out of sequence) filmed in Genoa—the other armpit, so to speak, of Italy, opposite to Venice—Had Italian war preparations; Cesare Battisti persuaded, we are told, 'Italy' to go to war against Austria-Hungary, changing the minds of most Italians. Portillo was entranced by this claim, in his poker-faked manner. That's really being influential! Very likely he was another Jew.
A few other Portillo episodes: on the east of Britain, going north-south, the Great Eastern Railway I think, we see Liverpool Street station, confusingly to the east of London, not thee west as might be expected from the position of Liverpool. A "room found by builders" was a large concealed Freemason's room, presumably for discussions on secret rail policies, though of course such things are written out of Portillo's script.
Brixham, where William of Orange landed in 1688 to invade England. This is never referred to s a 'conquest', and phrases such as 'bloodless revolution' are traditional lies. With Portillo, there is always a prearranged meeting with some supposed expert or 'local historian' to give a small part of the story, usually in a rather breathless style, and apparently from memory.
And Manchester, which, it's easy to forget, was a negligible place a few centuries back. As usual, we have a stupid or misleading guide, in this case to the Chetham's Library, pronounced, and apparently also spelt, Cheatham, 'the oldest public library' in some area; perhaps Europe. Opened 1653. (It has a catalogue online, I read). Timbered interior, and chained books. With a side area in which Marx and Engels planned the fraud of 'Communism'. Engels worked here; and after some reluctance and hesitation, Engels was revealed to have been part of the ownership of one or more factories. The actual design and building was not discussed; the rich Jew aspect was discussed even less, if possible. The fascinatingly grim story of the interplay between European Jewish finance, European Jewish industrialism, and secretive 'freemasons', was kept entirely hidden, in the traditional Jewish manner. Portillo Cheshire-catted throughout.
An interlude showed Exeter; and some guardian of Penguin books. Her official story was that some publisher, after visiting Agatha Christie, visited the railway's book sales place to while away his hours. And got the idea of cheap paperbacks, 6 pence in place of a typical price 7 times as much. Portillo of course says this event (perhaps the origin of the Penguin imprint) was money-making. In fact it was a propaganda outlet; there's no difficulty sneaking money into Jewish schemes.
The Penguin symbol was drawn by a visitor to London zoo. I doubt if the exact wording exists anywhere; but the general idea was that a penguin looks slightly human and rather qquaint and silly. Probably a goy, in fact. The year was 1935.
Episode 7 (broadcast first Jan 2014) includes "Bletchley to Newport Pagnell". 'Portillo travels through Buckinghamshire, meeting one of the Second World War's most secret agents at Station X in Bletchley'. Bletchley Park is supposed to be near a rail line between Oxford and Cambridge; full of thinkers, and of course Jews. I'd guess there may have been a link with Jewish bankers. Almost 70 years after the Second World War supposedly ended, we see an old woman saying how secret everything was, up to I think 1975, where her habitual secrecy continued. She is likely to be dead by now. Portillo pulls his serious face, plus his deeply concerned face. Probably she'd helped Russians and Germans to kill each other, as part of the Jewish victory in the World Wars.
Another sigh-inducing episode showed Portillo in Portugal. Interesting points include a scene of Coimbro's university library, in which Portillo showed no interest whatever in the vast collection of books, many, admittedly, one would imagine of no great value. I recall a similar scene with Tony Blair, Jew puppet, in 10 Downing Street. Portugal has a racial Jewish connection, not mentioned by Portillo; see for example Senator Thorkelson on Jews in 1940. Why Portugal is separated from Spain was not discussed either.
Yet another sickening episode is in Israel. Portillo says nothing of the Talmud, itself a rather sickening collection of 'Rabbinical' trash. Portillo says Bialek—a Ukrainian—whom Portillo was the 'Shakespeare of Israel'—yes, of course he was!—compulsory for all Israel schoolkids! Nothing of course on eastern European girls used by Jews as prostitutes. Nothing on mass murder of Ukrainians by Jews. But of course the fraud of the 'Holocaust' of Jews is pretended by Portillo to have been true. He of course uses it subtly to praise race mixing and immigration into Europe. The sight of Israel—it has shores, so we see shots of waves—it also has railways, copied of course from whites. And concrete buildings, copied from Whites. And town layouts, copied from Whites. And infrastructure built by Germans. It's a relief to think that, if Jewish parasitism is eventually grubbed up, nothing significant will be left.
One programme had Portillo expressing pleasure at a poet of Jews; I didn't jot down the name. It's a bit of a sore point with Jews, their uncreativity, so no doubt that's why. It was totalitarian ghettos that 99% of Jews lived in, for 3,000 years, clinging on like parasites to Christian or other civilisations. The rule of the Rabbi was absolute, that's why in these ghettos they never-ever produced any culture. No art, literature, architecture, even comedy. All forbidden.
Portillo fronted another episode, on Transylvania, Vlad the Impaler, Romania and its oil and Black Sea coast. He 'forgot' to mention the reason for Vlad's policy of impalement, probably a rather clear suggestion that invading Moslems should go away. Jews have a policy of leaving other Jews' schemes alone. Islam was largely a Jewish invention, probably to use Arabs as thugs. It was and still is quite successful, in the power struggle sense, its main victory being vast killings of Buddhists in north-west India.
An an episode on Holland, or more precisely the Netherlands. Interesting stuff on vast flower auctions and multiple-dish East Indies food, and the flat delta country. And a bit on the Treaty of Utrecht and combining against the Spanish monarchy. But nothing on the Amsterdam synagogue, which collected money to invade England, kill Charles, and fund Cromwell and civil war. Unsurprisingly, the English Civil War is an important event which the (((BBC))) has never covered. I keep meaning to look up, or 'research', the true dates of founding of Oxbridge colleges and libraries; far from being immensely old, most post-date the installation of Jewish money. Perhaps in their turn they will be destroyed; and perhaps they deserve it. They post-date the 'Great Fire' and Plague and St Paul's.
London including Battersea Power Station, and Churchill at War.
I mention Battersea only because Portillo of course knows nothing about it: how much of Battersea was demolished, why should it have had four corners, what was the case for putting London's electricity generation in London, how accurate were their forecasts.
Churchill's war room experience was a Q and A thing from what I presume was a failed actor, with Portillo the warm-up act on things like storm clouds of war and threats from Europe leading up to the declaration of war—by Britain (or England?) and France against Germany. The Jews in the USA held back; Why was war between USA and Germany put off till 1941 is a French investigation as to why. Churchill of course lived (without investigation) in a huge country house, but wasn't kept rich, probably in case his Jewish controllers thought he might become independent. Churchill knew the “doleful news” of British bankruptcy soon enough, though he immodestly kept secret the transfers of assets to American Jews. The torture rooms (look up 'Tineye') nearby were not examined by Portillo. Nor were the issues raised by the leaders of the Navy, Army, and Air-Force.