Mahathir bin Mohamad: The Malay Dilemma (1970)

---

I've owned a copy of this book for many years; it seems to be the first of many. It dates from the time the USA, under Jew direction, had carried out genocide in Vietnam (with allies such as Britain) and had probably worked out a scheme for owning assets and exploiting a central bank. With control of the media by Jews—and unprecedented effectiveness of TV—probably they foresaw no difficulties with small matters such as mass murder, chemical experiments, and mass rapes by Americans. So with some relief, and puzzlement, I found this book, which is relatively calm, dispassionate, unfanatical, and intelligent. Mahathir bin Mohamad is part of a confusing area, with Moslem influences, Chinese and Malay groups, Indian labour, Singapore, the leftovers of British officialdom, and so on. He became Prime Minister of Malaya in 1981, according to my notes. I was reminded of him by the usual frantic absurdity of Jews: Mahathir bin Mohamad was described as anti-Semitic, overtly anti-Semitic, and the rest of it.

When trying to get the feel of such areas, it is useless to rely on pets of Jews. They will be 'leaders' who had to be told they were leaders by Jews. They will no doubt quote The Economist, and academics funded by Jews. People such as Matathir bin Mohamad (I'm tempted to write 'pbuh') are therefore valuable, in the same way that honest Jew-aware people in the USA, Europe, Africa and so on are more useful than credo-quoting puppets. This is not a detailed review; I'm concerned mainly to suggest that Jew-aware writers are likely to be far more useful than simple money-grabbing politicians.

Briefly, he's an 'educated Malay', concerned to make Malay the official language, move trade and education away from Chinese and Indian minorities. Malay is now the official language, and 'Tuan' is an official honorific meaning 'Mister'—Malays are or were very polite and deferential, and this allows some ambiguity. This book has good descriptions of things like Chinese business practices and bargaining: 'East of Suez prices are never fixed', and Malays' tendency to 'not understand the potentialities of money', and a survey of what makes nations and citizens. I could find nothing about British or (((British))) 'anti-Communism'. I'd guess his opinions became more explicit in the long interval after 1970 to May 2018, when he became Prime Minister for the second time. And he may have found out (e.g.) that Jews invented Islam.

He had a fairly high opinion of the British, when not involved in world muddles. There was divide and rule between Chinese and Indian immigrants, town Malays, and country Malays. Roads were just for export of rubber and tin. They ruled well, with civil service, law and order, settling of minor wars, putting down piracy, collecting taxes—actually spent on public services.
      But British treaties and 'advice' were hypocritical, and they were generous with other peoples' land—notably of Palestine. But World War 2 and Japan crushed faith in Britain. There's much more, some very probably outdated. On migrations, Mahathir is straightforward, not even considering the Jewish fantasist lies. I'll give some notes I made. My point really is that the author seems to have a helpful, objective, top-down view of races, totally different from the Jewish fanatical media-control, money control, and violence attitude.

---

Malays: Development of small villages or farms, easy life, 21 | Town, country Malays 26 ff | health neglected by British 28 | Abhor celibacy, 29 | urbanising the rural dwellers would be beneficial, because the most progressive nations have maximum urbanisation, 79, 112 | Moslem inheritance involves splitting up land holdings, 112 | Malays don't understand naturalness of racial discrimination, 113 | good manners to be deferent, unlike Chinese & Indians, 116 | insidious campaign to make Malaya not country of Malays, 122 | international consent and recognition important in national identity 122 | are owners of Malaya 126 and 133, unlike Chinese or Indians, who claim loyalty, but can return | Are the developers of a country its owners? | immigration not severely restricted by Malays, 142 | Ethical codes and culture, which 'have never been studied' 154 ff | Islam, has five interpretations, 155 | Fatalism, 158 | Self-examination, 'know thyself', no equivalent among Malays 159 | Islamic idea of saint, 160 | Courage in sense of standing firm, measuring odds, unknown; Malays usually foolhardy 161 | Plato's three cardinal virtues do not apply, 161 | Careless way time is spent, un-timetable like, 163 | Property and land: old sultanates, a Malay just had to find land to clear then claim right 166 | Land disputes become emotional issues, acrimonious legal wrangles 167 | Attitude to money, tends to be spendthrift 167 | Interest and Usury influenced by Islam | Social code a cause or an effect? 169 | Frankness not part of code 171 | Sultans etc, have done no real harm, supported by most Malays 104 & Titles: whole range, Tunku etc princes, Syeds descendants of prophets: feudal society can be dynamic [e.g. from animism to Hindu to Muslim] if there's dynamism at the top 170, 173 | Malays comparatively not good 176

---

I found this on RT.com

Court finds Bush and Blair guilty of war crimes 23 Nov, 2011 14:13
Those who lobbied to have George W. Bush and Tony Blair tried for their role in the Iraq War have finally got their wish. Though the verdict of the court carries no legal weight, its supporters believe its symbolic value is beyond doubt.

The court in Malaysia where the trial took place may not have the power to convict, but the verdict against the former British and American leaders was unanimous.

“War criminals have to be dealt with – convict Bush and Blair as charged. A guilty verdict will serve as a notice to the world that war criminals may run but can never ultimately hide from truth and justice,” the statement from the Perdana Global Peace Foundation read.

The foundation was set up by former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamed, who was always a staunch opponent of the war against the regime of Saddam Hussain in 2003. He previously branded Blair and Bush “child-killers”.

The tribunal, which consisted of a former federal judge and several academics, paid particular attention to the failure of the Western military to find a single weapon of mass destruction in Iraq. WMDs were cited by the Western coalition as a major reason for their military intervention. It also declared the war to be in contravention of the will of the United Nations.

“The evidence showed that the drums of war were being beaten long before the invasion. The accused in their own memoirs have admitted their intention to invade Iraq regardless of international law,” said the tribunal.

The tribunal has no powers of enforcement, and as yet there has been no response from Bush or Blair. But the Perdana Peace Foundation says it hopes to maintain pressure from the international community on the two leaders, both of whom have now retired from domestic politics.

Meanwhile, Donald Rumsfeld, the US Secretary of Defence during the Iraq War, is next on the list to have his case heard by the mock court.