Andrew Joyce
by Rae West 21 Jan 2022
This looks at Andrew Joyce; I assumed this is a pseudonym, but perhaps not. I doubt if he's widely known outside the boundaries of Kevin MacDonald's Occidental Observer, which is a supposedly Jew-aware website. It has a group of commenters who routinely applaud both men, and (I'd guess) routinely suppress opposing comments. Here's me, reviewing MacDonald's last book, published after a 25-year interval. And here's another crit of MacDonald, this time by Miles W Mathis, on Why I Think Kevin MacDonald is Controlled Opposition. Mathis was not aware of MacDonald, and says little about his writings, though he does quote a passage which Joyce also used.20 Jan 2022 Andrew Joyce on the failure of conservatism (in Kevin MacDonald's TheOccidentalObserver.net) is an article illustrating the failure of the MacDonald school of criticism of Jews.
Amidst its painfully long and winding and intricate sentences Joyce fails to grasp the power and penetration of Jewish beliefs, as they are presented to goyim.
Joyce belongs to the school of academic conventional journals and books, one would guess wanting to make a career in the shockingly compromised world of official history. He has written good articles for the Occidental Observer, for example on 'pogroms', though close reading suggests he is simply reviving 'Great War' investigations, which were well-known, among informed people, at the time.
Joyce on the failure of conservatism stresses the failures of what he calls 'Conservatism' without ever checking whether so-called 'conservatives' are controlled in any way. He doesn't look into the background of 'Boris Johnson' and lacks the analytical techniques of Mathis. But it's obvious that 'Johnson' and his various unqualified appointees from numerous racial groups are probably not British Conservatives, who, if they ever existed, have long since been swept away by Jewish money power, and the Jewish victory of the Second World War. Just as 'Labour' is unrepresentative of workers.
It's not easy to summarise Joyce's arguments, as his writing style resembles that of Alistair Cooke. It's significant that Cooke is barely remembered, despite heavy boosting by the BBC: Cooke must have written out a series of supposed links, forged by Jewish publicists, and then reproduced them in reverse order, typically for 15-minute audio segments. Years later, there's a curious cluttered series of non-sequiturs left behind. This technique resembles that of sermons: I once analysed a few, which turned out to be about one-third absurd Jewish stories, and one-third on the need to support the fabric of churches and their dependants, and one-third on practical stuff, such as involvement in wars, or cheering for the monarchy.
Joyce starts with a whole paragraph on advancing backwards, priority (I'd have thought) to Churchill on Dunkirk and 'advancing to the sea'. However Joyce attributes this to Korea, assuming the true British conservative would bomb Koreans. He seems not to know that Jews were active in the USA, UK, USSR, and China. Though it's easy to see why he should evade Dunkirk. We receive the point of his article, though not of course the reason. I'll quote him (just once): it’s a useful shorthand for the unending stream of failures by the mainstream Right. From immigration to gay marriage and the "war on Woke," the conservative bloc has an innate talent not only for giving ground in its various culture wars, but for somehow reinterpreting or dissembling concession as an advance in a different direction. At the heart of "the conservative problem" is the issue of inclusion versus exclusion... The 'mainstream Right' is a Jewish fabrication, uninterested in Britons. 'Inclusion versus exclusion' seems to be just another Jewish phrasing.
It's fascinating to watch Joyce—seemingly, he thinks 'transexuals' have been waiting in the wings to step forward, rather than be paid by some pawn of Soros to gabble their lines, of unbiological rubbish. He's amusing on Christians, seemingly unaware that the whole fleet of nonsensical rafts was a Jewish invention, successfully directing money to some goyim in exchange for their pliability. He's amusing on Hitler, without seeing through the whole structure. He includes a sort of book review, on North Korea; he accepts MacDonald's idea that whites are exceptionally given to honest support of ethical issues, such as armies of white men killing each other in the USA 'civil war', and Americans bombing Germans in wars, something more convincingly explained by money—the Federal Reserve printing notes and paying the simpletons. Instead, he takes 'morality-based racial ethnocentrism and ... moral in-groups among Whites' seriously.
The fact is that MacDonald has said nothing on Jews and the Kahal, nothing on the Holohoax, nothing on the Fed, nothing on wars, nothing on waste, nothing on 'COVID'. His principal battle is on Jews and laws on immigration. As far as I've noticed he hasn't even mentioned the US Army against American civilians to force 'busing'. It's an awful lot to be not interested in.
Andrew Joyce needs to replace his querulous barque with something like an icebreaker, to power through the cold irregular waste areas of jew lies.
Andrew Joyce on medical malpractice by immigrant 'doctors' is a good piece, using publicly-available facts. These are unmentioned generally by the Jewish-controlled press and media: when did you last see a BBC newsreader's script mentioning another incompetent doctor? But Joyce does not say who was responsible for fake reasons to encourage alien immigration.
HTML, research, scanning, styling, Rae West - first upload 21 January 2022